Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-50, -80A1/A3, and -80C2A Series Turbofan Engines, 60604-60606 [E7-21000]
Download as PDF
60604
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: Robert.green@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7754; fax (781)
238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0053; Directorate
Identifier 98–ANE–54–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company CF6–50, –80A1/A3,
and –80C2A Series Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–50, –80A1/A3, and
–80C2A series turbofan engines,
installed on Airbus A300 and A310
series airplanes. That AD currently
requires initial and repetitive
inspections and checks of the thrust
reverser actuation systems. This
proposed AD would require revised
inspection thresholds and intervals, and
would require the same actions and
additional inspections of the thrust
reverser actuation system locking
features. This proposed AD results from
refined safety analyses performed on the
thrust reverser systems by GE and
Airbus. We are proposing this AD to
prevent inadvertent in-flight thrust
reverser deployment, which can result
in loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by December 24,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Contact Middle River Aircraft
Systems, Mail Point 46, 103 Chesapeake
Park Plaza, Baltimore, MD, 21220, attn:
Warranty Support, telephone: (410)
682–0094, fax: (410) 682–0100 for the
service information identified in this
proposed AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:49 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0053; Directorate Identifier
98–ANE–54–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
The FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by superseding AD 99–18–20,
Amendment 39–11286 (64 FR 48286,
September 3, 1999). That AD requires
initial and repetitive inspections and
checks of the thrust reverser actuation
systems, and allows extended repetitive
inspection intervals if an optional
double p-seal configuration is installed.
That AD was the result of a report of a
higher than anticipated center drive unit
cone brake failure rate, which reduces
the overall thrust reverser system
protection against inadvertent
deployment. That condition, if not
corrected, could result in inadvertent inflight thrust reverser deployment, which
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
can result in loss of control of the
airplane.
Actions Since AD 99–18–20 Was Issued
Since AD 99–18–20 was issued,
refined safety analyses performed on the
thrust reverser systems installed on GE
CF6–50, –80A1/A3, and –80C2A series
turbofan engines were completed by GE
and Airbus.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of Middle River
Aircraft Systems (MRAS) Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) No. CF6–50 S/B
78A3001, Revision 4, dated August 30,
2007, ASB No. CF6–80A1/A3 S/B
78A1002, Revision 5, dated July 19,
2007, and ASB No. CF6–80C2A1/A2/
A3/A5/A8/A5F S/B 78A1015, Revision
7, dated August 30, 2007. These ASBs
describe procedures for performing
initial and repetitive thrust reverser
system inspections and checks.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. For that reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
revised inspection thresholds and
intervals, and would require inspections
of the thrust reverser actuation system
locking features. The proposed AD
would require that you do these actions
using the relevant service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 206 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about one
work-hour per engine to perform the
proposed additional inspection, and
that the average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total additional cost of the
proposed AD for one inspection of the
U.S. fleet, to be $28,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Proposed Rules
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Docket Number Change
We are transferring the docket for this
proposed AD to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) as part of
our on-going docket management
consolidation efforts. The new Docket
No. is FAA–2007–0053. The old Docket
No. became the Directorate Identifier,
which is 98–ANE–54–AD.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–11286 (64 FR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:49 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
48286, September 3, 1999) and by
adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2007–0053; Directorate Identifier 98–
ANE–54–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by
December 24, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 99–18–20,
Amendment 39–11286.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–50, –80A1/A3, and
–80C2A series turbofan engines. These
engines are installed on Airbus A300 and
A310 series airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from refined safety
analyses performed on the thrust reverser
systems by GE and Airbus. We are issuing
this AD to prevent inadvertent in-flight thrust
reverser deployment, which can result in loss
of control of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Inspection for CF6–50 Series
Turbofan Engines
(f) For CF6–50 series turbofan engines,
perform initial thrust reverser inspections
using Section 2, Accomplishment
Instructions, of Middle River Aircraft
Systems (MRAS) Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. CF6–50 S/B 78A–3001, Revision 4, dated
August 30, 2007, as follows:
(1) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Three Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and without thrust reverser
actuation system (TRAS) locks installed,
perform the initial inspections and checks
within 1,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Three Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and with TRAS locks
installed, perform the initial inspections and
checks within 7,000 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
(3) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Two Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and without TRAS locks
installed, perform the initial inspections and
checks within 1,500 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
(4) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Two Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and with TRAS locks
installed, perform the initial inspections and
checks within 7,000 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
Repetitive Inspections for CF6–50 Series
Turbofan Engines
(g) For CF6–50 series turbofan engines,
perform repetitive thrust reverser inspections
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60605
using Section 2, Accomplishment
Instructions, of MRAS ASB No. CF6–50 S/B
78A–3001, Revision 4, dated August 30,
2007, as follows:
(1) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Three Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and without TRAS locks
installed, perform repetitive inspections and
checks at the following:
(i) Within every 2,500 hours time-sincelast-inspection (TSLI), perform paragraph
2.D., Translating Cowl Air Seal, Dagmar
Fairing and Aft Frame Inspection; and
paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser Operational
Check.
(ii) Within every 6,000 hours TSLI, perform
paragraph 2.C., Pneumatic Drive Motor
(PDM) Disc Brake Holding Torque Check;
paragraph 2.E., Feedback Rod to Yoke
Alignment Check and Inspection of Feedback
Yoke and Feedback Rod; paragraph 2.F.,
Translating Cowl Auto Re-Stow Function
Check; and paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser
Operational Check.
(2) Within every 7,000 hours TSLI on
Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Three
Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and with TRAS locks
installed, perform repetitive inspections and
checks.
(3) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Two Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and without TRAS locks
installed, perform repetitive inspections and
checks at the following:
(i) Within every 2,500 hours TSLI, perform
paragraph 2.D., Translating Cowl Air Seal,
Dagmar Fairing and Aft Frame Inspection;
and paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser Operational
Check.
(ii) Within every 6,000 hours TSLI, perform
paragraph 2.C., Pneumatic Drive Motor
(PDM) Disc Brake Holding Torque Check;
paragraph 2.E., Feedback Rod to Yoke
Alignment Check and Inspection of Feedback
Yoke and Feedback Rod; paragraph 2.G.,
Translating Cowl Auto Re-Stow Function
Check; paragraph 2.H., Over Pressure Shutoff
Valve (OPSOV) Indication Check; and
paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser Operational
Check.
(4) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with
a Two Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and with TRAS locks
installed, perform repetitive inspections and
checks within every 7,000 hours TSLI.
Initial and Repetitive Inspections for CF6–
80A1/A3 Series Turbofan Engines
(h) For CF6–80A1/A3 series turbofan
engines installed on Airbus A310–200
airplanes, perform initial and repetitive
thrust reverser inspections using Section 2,
Accomplishment Instructions, of MRAS ASB
No. CF6–80A1/A3 S/B 78A–1002, Revision 5,
dated July 19, 2007, at the following:
(1) For initial inspection, within 1,500
hours TIS after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For repetitive inspections, within every
7,000 hours TSLI.
Initial Inspection for CF6–80C2A Series
Turbofan Engines
(i) For CF6–80C2A series turbofan engines,
perform initial thrust reverser inspections
using Section 2, Accomplishment
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
60606
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Instructions, of MRAS ASB No. CF6–
80C2A1/A2/A3/A5/A8/A5F S/B 78A1015,
Revision 7, dated August 30, 2007, at the
following:
(1) On Airbus A300 and A310 series
airplanes with left-hand and right-hand
reverser halves that do not have the double/
backup P-seal introduced by MRAS SB No.
CF6–80C2 S/B 78A1005, and that do not
have locking actuator assemblies (LAAs)
installed, within 600 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) On Airbus A300 and A310 series
airplanes with left-hand and right-hand
reverser halves that have the double/backup
P-seal introduced by MRAS SB No. CF6–
80C2 S/B 78A1005, or that have LAAs
installed, within 7,000 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
Directional Pilot Valve (DPV) Pressure
Switch Check on Airbus Airplanes With
CF6–80C2A5F Engines Is Not Applicable
(3) The DPV pressure switch check per
paragraph 2.F. is not applicable to Airbus
airplanes with CF6–80C2A5F left-hand and
right-hand fan reverser halves (model ES–
CF6–5), because this check is performed
through the full authority digital electronic
control fault detection system.
(3) MRAS ASB No. CF6–80C2 S/B
78A1015, Revision 5, dated January 21, 1999;
and MRAS ASB No. CF6–80C2A1/A2/A3/
A5/A8/A5F S/B 78A1015, Revision 6, dated
May 3, 2006.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(m) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(n) France AD 1999–422– IMP(B), dated
October 20, 1999, also addresses the subject
of this AD.
(o) Contact Robert Green, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: Robert.green@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7754; fax (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
October 18, 2007.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–21000 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Engines That Fail an Inspection or Check
(k) On engines that fail an inspection or
check required by this AD, perform
corrective actions or deactivate the fan
reverser per Section 2, Accomplishment
Instructions, of the applicable MRAS ASB,
before further flight.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Repetitive Inspections for CF6–80C2A Series
Turbofan Engines
(j) For CF6–80C2A series turbofan engines,
perform repetitive thrust reverser inspections
using Section 2, Accomplishment
Instructions, of MRAS ASB No. CF6–
80C2A1/A2/A3/A5/A8/A5F S/B 78A1015,
Revision 7, dated August 30, 2007, at the
following:
(1) On Airbus A300 and A310 series
airplanes with left-hand and right-hand
reverser halves that do not have the double/
backup P-seal, introduced by MRAS SB No.
CF6–80C2 S/B 78A1005, and that do not
have LAAs installed, within every 600 hours
TSLI.
(2) On Airbus A300 and A310 series
airplanes with left-hand and right-hand
reverser halves that have the double/backup
P-seal, introduced by MRAS SB No. CF6–
80C2 S/B 78A1015, or that have LAAs
installed, within every 7,000 hours TSLI.
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for Rolls-Royce plc (RR)
RB211–535E4–37, RB211–535E4–B–37,
and RB211–535E4–B–75 series turbofan
engines. That AD requires initial and
repetitive ultrasonic inspections of
installed low pressure compressor (LPC)
fan blade roots on-wing and during
overhaul, and relubrication according to
accumulated life cycles. That AD also
introduces an alternative technique to
ultrasonically inspect installed fan
blades on-wing using a surface wave
ultrasonic probe. Also, that AD
introduces application of Metco 58
blade root coating as an optional
terminating action. This proposed AD
would require the same actions but
would add compliance paragraphs to
Previous Credit
(l) Initial and repetitive inspections and
checks of the thrust reverser actuation
systems done before the effective date of this
AD that use the following ASBs, comply with
the requirements specified in this AD:
(1) MRAS ASB No. CF6–50 S/B 78A–3001,
Revision 2, dated December 18, 1997; and
MRAS ASB No. CF6–50 S/B 78A–3001,
Revision 3, dated May 3, 2006.
(2) MRAS ASB No. CF6–80A1/A3 S/B
78A–1002, Revision 3, dated January 21,
1999; and MRAS ASB No. CF6–80A1/A3 S/
B 78A–1002, Revision 4, dated May 3, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:49 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29343; Directorate
Identifier 2000–NE–13–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc RB211 Series Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
relax the compliance schedule for
repetitive inspections for RB211–535E4
engines operating in flight profiles A
and B, if certain requirements are met.
This proposed AD results from RR
issuing Mandatory Service Bulletin
(MSB) No. RB.211–72–C879, Revision 5.
That MSB introduces a relaxed
repetitive compliance schedule for
RB211–535E4 engines operating in
flight profiles A and B, if certain
requirements are met. We are proposing
this AD to detect cracks in LPC fan
blade roots, which if not detected, could
lead to uncontained multiple fan blade
failure, and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by December 24,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Contact Rolls-Royce plc, PO Box 31,
Derby, England, DE248BJ; telephone:
011–44–1332–242–424; fax: 011–44–
1332–249–936 for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803–
5299; e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov;
telephone: (781) 238–7178; fax: (781)
238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2007–29343; Directorate Identifier
2000–NE–13–AD’’ in the subject line of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 206 (Thursday, October 25, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60604-60606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21000]
[[Page 60604]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0053; Directorate Identifier 98-ANE-54-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-50, -80A1/
A3, and -80C2A Series Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50, -80A1/A3, and
-80C2A series turbofan engines, installed on Airbus A300 and A310
series airplanes. That AD currently requires initial and repetitive
inspections and checks of the thrust reverser actuation systems. This
proposed AD would require revised inspection thresholds and intervals,
and would require the same actions and additional inspections of the
thrust reverser actuation system locking features. This proposed AD
results from refined safety analyses performed on the thrust reverser
systems by GE and Airbus. We are proposing this AD to prevent
inadvertent in-flight thrust reverser deployment, which can result in
loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by December 24,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Contact Middle River Aircraft Systems, Mail Point 46, 103
Chesapeake Park Plaza, Baltimore, MD, 21220, attn: Warranty Support,
telephone: (410) 682-0094, fax: (410) 682-0100 for the service
information identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
Robert.green@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7754; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0053;
Directorate Identifier 98-ANE-54-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
The FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 by superseding AD 99-18-
20, Amendment 39-11286 (64 FR 48286, September 3, 1999). That AD
requires initial and repetitive inspections and checks of the thrust
reverser actuation systems, and allows extended repetitive inspection
intervals if an optional double p-seal configuration is installed. That
AD was the result of a report of a higher than anticipated center drive
unit cone brake failure rate, which reduces the overall thrust reverser
system protection against inadvertent deployment. That condition, if
not corrected, could result in inadvertent in-flight thrust reverser
deployment, which can result in loss of control of the airplane.
Actions Since AD 99-18-20 Was Issued
Since AD 99-18-20 was issued, refined safety analyses performed on
the thrust reverser systems installed on GE CF6-50, -80A1/A3, and -
80C2A series turbofan engines were completed by GE and Airbus.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of Middle
River Aircraft Systems (MRAS) Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. CF6-50
S/B 78A3001, Revision 4, dated August 30, 2007, ASB No. CF6-80A1/A3 S/B
78A1002, Revision 5, dated July 19, 2007, and ASB No. CF6-80C2A1/A2/A3/
A5/A8/A5F S/B 78A1015, Revision 7, dated August 30, 2007. These ASBs
describe procedures for performing initial and repetitive thrust
reverser system inspections and checks.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. For that reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require revised inspection thresholds and intervals, and
would require inspections of the thrust reverser actuation system
locking features. The proposed AD would require that you do these
actions using the relevant service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 206 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about one work-hour per engine to perform the proposed additional
inspection, and that the average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based
on these figures, we estimate the total additional cost of the proposed
AD for one inspection of the U.S. fleet, to be $28,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
[[Page 60605]]
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Docket Number Change
We are transferring the docket for this proposed AD to the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) as part of our on-going docket
management consolidation efforts. The new Docket No. is FAA-2007-0053.
The old Docket No. became the Directorate Identifier, which is 98-ANE-
54-AD.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-11286 (64 FR
48286, September 3, 1999) and by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2007-0053; Directorate
Identifier 98-ANE-54-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by December 24,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 99-18-20, Amendment 39-11286.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50, -
80A1/A3, and -80C2A series turbofan engines. These engines are
installed on Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from refined safety analyses performed on
the thrust reverser systems by GE and Airbus. We are issuing this AD
to prevent inadvertent in-flight thrust reverser deployment, which
can result in loss of control of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Inspection for CF6-50 Series Turbofan Engines
(f) For CF6-50 series turbofan engines, perform initial thrust
reverser inspections using Section 2, Accomplishment Instructions,
of Middle River Aircraft Systems (MRAS) Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. CF6-50 S/B 78A-3001, Revision 4, dated August 30, 2007, as
follows:
(1) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Three Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and without thrust reverser
actuation system (TRAS) locks installed, perform the initial
inspections and checks within 1,500 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after the effective date of this AD.
(2) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Three Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and with TRAS locks installed,
perform the initial inspections and checks within 7,000 hours TIS
after the effective date of this AD.
(3) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Two Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and without TRAS locks installed,
perform the initial inspections and checks within 1,500 hours TIS
after the effective date of this AD.
(4) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Two Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and with TRAS locks installed,
perform the initial inspections and checks within 7,000 hours TIS
after the effective date of this AD.
Repetitive Inspections for CF6-50 Series Turbofan Engines
(g) For CF6-50 series turbofan engines, perform repetitive
thrust reverser inspections using Section 2, Accomplishment
Instructions, of MRAS ASB No. CF6-50 S/B 78A-3001, Revision 4, dated
August 30, 2007, as follows:
(1) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Three Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and without TRAS locks installed,
perform repetitive inspections and checks at the following:
(i) Within every 2,500 hours time-since-last-inspection (TSLI),
perform paragraph 2.D., Translating Cowl Air Seal, Dagmar Fairing
and Aft Frame Inspection; and paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser
Operational Check.
(ii) Within every 6,000 hours TSLI, perform paragraph 2.C.,
Pneumatic Drive Motor (PDM) Disc Brake Holding Torque Check;
paragraph 2.E., Feedback Rod to Yoke Alignment Check and Inspection
of Feedback Yoke and Feedback Rod; paragraph 2.F., Translating Cowl
Auto Re-Stow Function Check; and paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser
Operational Check.
(2) Within every 7,000 hours TSLI on Airbus A300 series
airplanes with a Three Light Reverser Indication Circuit
configuration, and with TRAS locks installed, perform repetitive
inspections and checks.
(3) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Two Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and without TRAS locks installed,
perform repetitive inspections and checks at the following:
(i) Within every 2,500 hours TSLI, perform paragraph 2.D.,
Translating Cowl Air Seal, Dagmar Fairing and Aft Frame Inspection;
and paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser Operational Check.
(ii) Within every 6,000 hours TSLI, perform paragraph 2.C.,
Pneumatic Drive Motor (PDM) Disc Brake Holding Torque Check;
paragraph 2.E., Feedback Rod to Yoke Alignment Check and Inspection
of Feedback Yoke and Feedback Rod; paragraph 2.G., Translating Cowl
Auto Re-Stow Function Check; paragraph 2.H., Over Pressure Shutoff
Valve (OPSOV) Indication Check; and paragraph 2.I., Fan Reverser
Operational Check.
(4) On Airbus A300 series airplanes with a Two Light Reverser
Indication Circuit configuration, and with TRAS locks installed,
perform repetitive inspections and checks within every 7,000 hours
TSLI.
Initial and Repetitive Inspections for CF6-80A1/A3 Series Turbofan
Engines
(h) For CF6-80A1/A3 series turbofan engines installed on Airbus
A310-200 airplanes, perform initial and repetitive thrust reverser
inspections using Section 2, Accomplishment Instructions, of MRAS
ASB No. CF6-80A1/A3 S/B 78A-1002, Revision 5, dated July 19, 2007,
at the following:
(1) For initial inspection, within 1,500 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) For repetitive inspections, within every 7,000 hours TSLI.
Initial Inspection for CF6-80C2A Series Turbofan Engines
(i) For CF6-80C2A series turbofan engines, perform initial
thrust reverser inspections using Section 2, Accomplishment
[[Page 60606]]
Instructions, of MRAS ASB No. CF6-80C2A1/A2/A3/A5/A8/A5F S/B
78A1015, Revision 7, dated August 30, 2007, at the following:
(1) On Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes with left-hand and
right-hand reverser halves that do not have the double/backup P-seal
introduced by MRAS SB No. CF6-80C2 S/B 78A1005, and that do not have
locking actuator assemblies (LAAs) installed, within 600 hours TIS
after the effective date of this AD.
(2) On Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes with left-hand and
right-hand reverser halves that have the double/backup P-seal
introduced by MRAS SB No. CF6-80C2 S/B 78A1005, or that have LAAs
installed, within 7,000 hours TIS after the effective date of this
AD.
Directional Pilot Valve (DPV) Pressure Switch Check on Airbus Airplanes
With CF6-80C2A5F Engines Is Not Applicable
(3) The DPV pressure switch check per paragraph 2.F. is not
applicable to Airbus airplanes with CF6-80C2A5F left-hand and right-
hand fan reverser halves (model ES-CF6-5), because this check is
performed through the full authority digital electronic control
fault detection system.
Repetitive Inspections for CF6-80C2A Series Turbofan Engines
(j) For CF6-80C2A series turbofan engines, perform repetitive
thrust reverser inspections using Section 2, Accomplishment
Instructions, of MRAS ASB No. CF6-80C2A1/A2/A3/A5/A8/A5F S/B
78A1015, Revision 7, dated August 30, 2007, at the following:
(1) On Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes with left-hand and
right-hand reverser halves that do not have the double/backup P-
seal, introduced by MRAS SB No. CF6-80C2 S/B 78A1005, and that do
not have LAAs installed, within every 600 hours TSLI.
(2) On Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes with left-hand and
right-hand reverser halves that have the double/backup P-seal,
introduced by MRAS SB No. CF6-80C2 S/B 78A1015, or that have LAAs
installed, within every 7,000 hours TSLI.
Engines That Fail an Inspection or Check
(k) On engines that fail an inspection or check required by this
AD, perform corrective actions or deactivate the fan reverser per
Section 2, Accomplishment Instructions, of the applicable MRAS ASB,
before further flight.
Previous Credit
(l) Initial and repetitive inspections and checks of the thrust
reverser actuation systems done before the effective date of this AD
that use the following ASBs, comply with the requirements specified
in this AD:
(1) MRAS ASB No. CF6-50 S/B 78A-3001, Revision 2, dated December
18, 1997; and MRAS ASB No. CF6-50 S/B 78A-3001, Revision 3, dated
May 3, 2006.
(2) MRAS ASB No. CF6-80A1/A3 S/B 78A-1002, Revision 3, dated
January 21, 1999; and MRAS ASB No. CF6-80A1/A3 S/B 78A-1002,
Revision 4, dated May 3, 2006.
(3) MRAS ASB No. CF6-80C2 S/B 78A1015, Revision 5, dated January
21, 1999; and MRAS ASB No. CF6-80C2A1/A2/A3/A5/A8/A5F S/B 78A1015,
Revision 6, dated May 3, 2006.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(m) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the
authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD
if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(n) France AD 1999-422- IMP(B), dated October 20, 1999, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
(o) Contact Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
Robert.green@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7754; fax (781) 238-7199,
for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 18, 2007.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-21000 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P