Notice of Availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Army Growth and Force Structure Realignment, 60661-60662 [07-5290]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Notices
Dated: October 19, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, DOD.
[FR Doc. 07–5275 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Notice of Availability of the Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) for Army Growth and
Force Structure Realignment
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
announces the availability of the Final
PEIS for the growth and realignment of
the U.S. Army. Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Department of the Army has prepared a
PEIS that evaluates the potential
environmental and socioeconomic
effects associated with alternatives for
growing and realigning the Army’s force
structure. The Army’s preferred
alternative identified in the Final PEIS
is Alternative 3 which will allow the
Army to grow and restructure its forces
to accommodate modular forces
initiatives and critical shortfalls, while
adding six Brigade Combat Teams
(BCTs) to the Army’s end strength.
Potential impacts have been analyzed at
installations that are being considered
for the stationing of 1,000 or more
additional Soldiers.
DATES: The waiting period for the final
PEIS will end 30 days after publication
of an NOA in the Federal Register by
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
To obtain a copy of the
Final PEIS contact: Public Affairs Office,
U.S. Army Environmental Command,
Building E4460, Attention: IMAE–PA
5179 Hoadley Road, Aberdeen Proving
Ground, MD 21010–5401. Questions
may also be sent to:
PublicComments@aec.apgea.army.mil.
ADDRESSES:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Affairs Office at (410) 436–2556;
facsimile at (410) 436–1693 (during
normal business hours Monday through
Friday).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Proposed Action and analysis within
the Final PEIS covers those activities
needed to increase the Army’s end
strength and realign its force structure
from Fiscal Year 2008 through Fiscal
Year 2013 to a size and composition that
is better able to meet national security
and defense requirements. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
Proposed Action involves stationing
decisions to align Army forces in
support of military transformation, unit
equipment and training readiness, and
Soldier and Family quality of life needs.
To implement the Proposed Action, new
units must be stationed at locations that
are able to accommodate unit training,
garrison operations, maintenance
activities, and Soldiers and their
Families. In addition, final stationing
locations must support the strategic
deployment and mobilization
requirements of the nation’s Combatant
Commanders to ensure they will have
the forces necessary to support regional
contingency operations and planning
requirements.
The Final PEIS examines major Army
training installations and their ability to
support new unit stationing actions in
connection with the growth and
realignment of the U.S. Army. The Final
PEIS provides the Army senior
leadership with a hard look at
environmental and socioeconomic
impacts associated with the Proposed
Action and informs the decision-making
process for selecting the final stationing
locations for new units. This effort
includes analysis of specific actions that
will need to be taken (such as the
construction of housing and quality of
life facilities, the construction of new
training ranges and infrastructure, and
changes in the intensity of use of
maneuver land and firing ranges) to
station new units as part of the Army’s
overall efforts to grow and realign the
force.
After reviewing a full range of
alternative sites, 17 installations capable
of supporting the Army’s growth and
realignment have been evaluated for
their ability to support three action
alternatives. The installations carried
forward for analysis included: Georgia:
Fort Benning and Fort Stewart; Texas:
Fort Bliss and Fort Hood: North
Carolina: Fort Bragg; Kentucky: Fort
Campbell and Fort Knox; Colorado: Fort
Carson; New York: Fort Drum;
California: Fort Hunter-Liggett and Fort
Irwin; Washington: Fort Lewis and
Yakima Training Center; Louisiana: Fort
Polk; Kansas: Fort Riley; New Mexico:
White Sands Missile Range; Arizona:
Yuma Proving Ground. Each of these
installations could receive 1,000 or
more additional soldiers as part of
alternatives being examined.
Alternatives carried forward for
analysis in the Final PEIS included: (1)
Implementing Army force structure
modifications between Fiscal Year 2008
and Fiscal Year 2013 to support the
Army’s Modular Transformation and
Global Defense Posture Review (GDPR)
decisions; (2) Executing those actions
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60661
discussed as part of Alternative 1 and,
in addition, adding approximately
30,000 Combat Support (CS) and
Combat Service Support (CSS) soldiers
to the Army to address critical shortfalls
in high demand military skills in both
Active Army and Reserve components;
(3) Executing those actions proposed in
Alternatives 1 and 2 and, in addition,
grow the Army by up to six Active Duty
BCTs. Additional BCTs would be
stationed at existing or newly
established Army stationing locations
within the continental United States. In
addition to these alternatives, the No
Action Alternative is described and its
impacts are fully assessed and
considered.
The Army’s preferred alternative
identified in the Final PEIS is to
implement Alternative 3. This
alternative allows for full support of
Army modularity initiatives by adding
necessary CS Soldiers to the Army’s
Active and Reserve components while
increasing the size of the Army by six
BCTs. Analysis within the Final PEIS
covers those activities required to
implement unit stationing actions
associated with Army growth and
realignment.
Site-specific action that will need to
be taken to support the preferred
alternative include the construction of
housing and quality of life facilities (i.e.,
gymnasiums, hospitals, shopping areas),
the construction of new training ranges
and infrastructure, and changes in the
intensity of use of maneuver land and
firing ranges associated with the
increased frequency of training events.
Stationing decisions made as part of this
effort will also consider strategic
military and national security
considerations. New stationing actions
must take place at locations that, if
selected, are capable of supporting the
National Security Strategy (2006), the
Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR
2006), National Military Strategy, and
the Army Campaign Plan (ACP).
Direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts of the Proposed Action have
been considered in the Final PEIS and
identification of the environmental and
socioeconomic impacts associated with
various unit stationing actions at each of
the 17 installations was carried forward
for analysis. Impacts at sites would
result from construction and training
activities related to the growth and
realignment of Army forces. Significant
impacts to resources could be direct and
long term. Decisions from the PEIS will
be tiered into site-specific NEPA
analyses at the installation level, as
specific stationing decisions are
determined. The Final PEIS provides
Army planners and decision makers
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
60662
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Notices
with critical and timely information on
the capacity and condition of each of
the installation’s environmental and
socioeconomic resources preceding
specific stationing actions. The No
Action Alternative provides the baseline
conditions for comparison to proposed
alternatives.
A copy of the Final PEIS can be
accessed through the U.S. Army
Environmental Command’s Web site at
(https://www.aec.army.mil).
Dated: October 18, 2007.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Environment, Safety and Occupational
Health).
[FR Doc. 07–5290 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Board of Visitors, United States
Military Academy (USMA)
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463),
announcement is made of the following
committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Board of
Visitors, United States Military
Academy.
Date: Friday, November 16, 2007.
Place of Meeting: The
Superintendent’s Conference Room,
Building 600 (Taylor Hall), West Point,
NY.
Time of Meeting: Approximately 1
p.m. through 4 p.m.
Board Mission: The Board, under the
provisions of 10 U.S.C. 4355, and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act of
1972, as amended, shall provide the
President of the United States
independent advice and
recommendations on matters relating to
the U.S. Military Academy, to include
but not limited to morale and discipline,
curriculum, instruction, physical
equipment, and academic methods.
Board Membership: The Board is
composed of 15 members, 9 of which
are members of Congress and 6 persons
designated by the President. The 2007
Chairman of the Board is Congressman
John McHugh, New York—23rd District.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cynthia Kramer, United States Military
Academy, West Point, NY 10996–5000,
(845) 938–5078 or via e-mail:
Cynthia.kramer@usma.edu.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
Proposed
Agenda: This is the Fall/Annual
Meeting of the Board of Visitors. The
Board plans to inquire into instruction
and physical equipment, accreditation,
and the implementation of the
Residential Communities Initiative (RCI)
Program at West Point. Board members
will attend classes with cadets and
participate in roundtable discussions.
All Board meeting proceedings are open
to the public. Picture identifcation is
required to enter West Point.
Public Inquiry at Board Meetings: Any
member of the public is permitted to file
a written statement with the USMA
Board of Visitors. Written statements
should be sent to the Designated Federal
Officer (DFO) at: United States Military
Academy, Office of the Secretary of the
General Staff (MASG), 646 Swift Road,
West Point, NY 10996–1905 or faxed to
the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at
(845) 938–3214. Written statements
must be received no later than five
working days prior to the next meeting
in order to provide time for member
consideration.
By rule, no member of the public
attending open meetings will be allowed
to present questions from the floor or
speak to any issue under consideration
by the Board.
decided to withdraw the proposed
Warehouse Performance Bond
Requirement Proposal.
DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Requests for additional
information may be sent to
Centralrsmo@sddc.army.mil; or by
courier to: Department of Army, HQ,
SDDC Central RSMO, ATTN: SDDC–
PPP–PA–C, P.O. Box 19225, Topeka, KS
66619–0225.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–5279 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
Department of the Army
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
Regulation Flexibility Act
This action is not considered
rulemaking within the meaning of
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3051 et seq., does not apply
because no information collection or
recordkeeping requirements are
imposed on contractors, offerors
alternatively, members of the public.
James N. Johnson,
Chief, Operations & Analysis Branch.
[FR Doc. 07–5277 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Performance Review Board
Membership
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Army
Withdrawal of Mandatory Requirement
Provision of Warehouse Performance
Bond by Department of Defense
Personal Property Storage
Transportation Service Providers (TSP)
Contractors
Department of Army, DOD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Military Surface
Deployment and Distribution Command
(SDDC) as the Program Manager for
DOD’s Personal Property NonTemporary Storage Program is
withdrawing the proposed Warehouse
Performance Bond Requirement
Proposal for Non-Temporary Storage
Transportation Service Providers. In
light of the information and comments
provided and considering the other
major on-going initiatives such as
implementation of Full Replacement
Value liability, Phase III of the Families
First initiative, etc. within the DOD
Personal Property Program, SDDC has
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: Notice is given of the names
of members of a Performance Review
Board for the Department of the Army.
DATES: Effective Date: September 30,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lucrecia Murdock, Civilian Senior
Leader Management Office, 140 Army
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310–0140.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, U.S.C.,
requires each agency to establish, in
accordance with regulations, one or
more Senior Executive Service
performance review boards. The boards
shall review and evaluate the initial
appraisal of senior executives’
performance by supervisors and make
recommendations to the appointing
authority or rating official relative to the
performance of these executives.
The members of the Department of the
Army Performance Review Boards are:
1. Mr. Richard G. Alpaugh, Deputy,
U.S. Army Security Assistance
Command, U.S. Army Materiel
Command.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 206 (Thursday, October 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60661-60662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Notice of Availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PEIS) for Army Growth and Force Structure Realignment
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of the
Final PEIS for the growth and realignment of the U.S. Army. Pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of the
Army has prepared a PEIS that evaluates the potential environmental and
socioeconomic effects associated with alternatives for growing and
realigning the Army's force structure. The Army's preferred alternative
identified in the Final PEIS is Alternative 3 which will allow the Army
to grow and restructure its forces to accommodate modular forces
initiatives and critical shortfalls, while adding six Brigade Combat
Teams (BCTs) to the Army's end strength. Potential impacts have been
analyzed at installations that are being considered for the stationing
of 1,000 or more additional Soldiers.
DATES: The waiting period for the final PEIS will end 30 days after
publication of an NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: To obtain a copy of the Final PEIS contact: Public Affairs
Office, U.S. Army Environmental Command, Building E4460, Attention:
IMAE-PA 5179 Hoadley Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5401.
Questions may also be sent to: PublicComments@aec.apgea.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Public Affairs Office at (410) 436-
2556; facsimile at (410) 436-1693 (during normal business hours Monday
through Friday).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed Action and analysis within the
Final PEIS covers those activities needed to increase the Army's end
strength and realign its force structure from Fiscal Year 2008 through
Fiscal Year 2013 to a size and composition that is better able to meet
national security and defense requirements. The Proposed Action
involves stationing decisions to align Army forces in support of
military transformation, unit equipment and training readiness, and
Soldier and Family quality of life needs. To implement the Proposed
Action, new units must be stationed at locations that are able to
accommodate unit training, garrison operations, maintenance activities,
and Soldiers and their Families. In addition, final stationing
locations must support the strategic deployment and mobilization
requirements of the nation's Combatant Commanders to ensure they will
have the forces necessary to support regional contingency operations
and planning requirements.
The Final PEIS examines major Army training installations and their
ability to support new unit stationing actions in connection with the
growth and realignment of the U.S. Army. The Final PEIS provides the
Army senior leadership with a hard look at environmental and
socioeconomic impacts associated with the Proposed Action and informs
the decision-making process for selecting the final stationing
locations for new units. This effort includes analysis of specific
actions that will need to be taken (such as the construction of housing
and quality of life facilities, the construction of new training ranges
and infrastructure, and changes in the intensity of use of maneuver
land and firing ranges) to station new units as part of the Army's
overall efforts to grow and realign the force.
After reviewing a full range of alternative sites, 17 installations
capable of supporting the Army's growth and realignment have been
evaluated for their ability to support three action alternatives. The
installations carried forward for analysis included: Georgia: Fort
Benning and Fort Stewart; Texas: Fort Bliss and Fort Hood: North
Carolina: Fort Bragg; Kentucky: Fort Campbell and Fort Knox; Colorado:
Fort Carson; New York: Fort Drum; California: Fort Hunter-Liggett and
Fort Irwin; Washington: Fort Lewis and Yakima Training Center;
Louisiana: Fort Polk; Kansas: Fort Riley; New Mexico: White Sands
Missile Range; Arizona: Yuma Proving Ground. Each of these
installations could receive 1,000 or more additional soldiers as part
of alternatives being examined.
Alternatives carried forward for analysis in the Final PEIS
included: (1) Implementing Army force structure modifications between
Fiscal Year 2008 and Fiscal Year 2013 to support the Army's Modular
Transformation and Global Defense Posture Review (GDPR) decisions; (2)
Executing those actions discussed as part of Alternative 1 and, in
addition, adding approximately 30,000 Combat Support (CS) and Combat
Service Support (CSS) soldiers to the Army to address critical
shortfalls in high demand military skills in both Active Army and
Reserve components; (3) Executing those actions proposed in
Alternatives 1 and 2 and, in addition, grow the Army by up to six
Active Duty BCTs. Additional BCTs would be stationed at existing or
newly established Army stationing locations within the continental
United States. In addition to these alternatives, the No Action
Alternative is described and its impacts are fully assessed and
considered.
The Army's preferred alternative identified in the Final PEIS is to
implement Alternative 3. This alternative allows for full support of
Army modularity initiatives by adding necessary CS Soldiers to the
Army's Active and Reserve components while increasing the size of the
Army by six BCTs. Analysis within the Final PEIS covers those
activities required to implement unit stationing actions associated
with Army growth and realignment.
Site-specific action that will need to be taken to support the
preferred alternative include the construction of housing and quality
of life facilities (i.e., gymnasiums, hospitals, shopping areas), the
construction of new training ranges and infrastructure, and changes in
the intensity of use of maneuver land and firing ranges associated with
the increased frequency of training events. Stationing decisions made
as part of this effort will also consider strategic military and
national security considerations. New stationing actions must take
place at locations that, if selected, are capable of supporting the
National Security Strategy (2006), the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR
2006), National Military Strategy, and the Army Campaign Plan (ACP).
Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the Proposed Action
have been considered in the Final PEIS and identification of the
environmental and socioeconomic impacts associated with various unit
stationing actions at each of the 17 installations was carried forward
for analysis. Impacts at sites would result from construction and
training activities related to the growth and realignment of Army
forces. Significant impacts to resources could be direct and long term.
Decisions from the PEIS will be tiered into site-specific NEPA analyses
at the installation level, as specific stationing decisions are
determined. The Final PEIS provides Army planners and decision makers
[[Page 60662]]
with critical and timely information on the capacity and condition of
each of the installation's environmental and socioeconomic resources
preceding specific stationing actions. The No Action Alternative
provides the baseline conditions for comparison to proposed
alternatives.
A copy of the Final PEIS can be accessed through the U.S. Army
Environmental Command's Web site at (https://www.aec.army.mil).
Dated: October 18, 2007.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety and
Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. 07-5290 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M