Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed East to West Hubline Expansion Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings, 60341-60345 [E7-20874]
Download as PDF
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Notices
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211
and 385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. It
is not necessary to separately intervene
again in a subdocket related to a
compliance filing if you have previously
intervened in the same docket. Protests
will be considered by the Commission
in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make
protestants parties to the proceeding.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or
protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. In reference
to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on
or before the comment deadline need
not be served on persons other than the
Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the
FERC Online links at https://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic
service, persons with Internet access
who will eFile a document and/or be
listed as a contact for an intervenor
must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the intervention or protest to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St., NE., Washington, DC
20426.
The filings in the above proceedings
are accessible in the Commission’s
eLibrary system by clicking on the
appropriate link in the above list. They
are also available for review in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room in
Washington, DC.
There is an eSubscription link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
dockets(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Nathaniel J. Davis,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–20903 Filed 10–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Oct 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF07–15–000]
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC;
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed East to West Hubline
Expansion Project, Request for
Comments on Environmental Issues,
and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings
October 16, 2007.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
that will identify and address the
environmental impacts that could result
from the construction and operation of
the East to West HubLine Expansion
Project (E2W Project or Project). The
E2W Project is proposed by Algonquin
Gas Transmission, LLC (Algonquin),
which is an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Spectra Energy Corp. The
Commission will use the EIS in its
decision-making process to determine
whether or not to authorize the Project.
This notice describes the proposed
Project facilities and explains the
scoping process that will be used to
gather input from the public and
interested agencies on the Project. Your
input will help determine the issues
that need to be evaluated in the EIS.
Please note that the scoping period for
the Project will close on November 21,
2007.
Comments on the Project may be
submitted in written form or verbally. In
lieu of or in addition to sending written
comments, you are invited to attend the
public scoping meetings that have been
scheduled in the Project area. These
meetings are scheduled for November 5,
2007 in Randolph, Massachusetts;
November 7, 2007 in North Andover,
Massachusetts; and November 8, 2007
in Norwich, Connecticut. Further
instructions on how to submit
comments and additional details of the
public scoping meetings are provided in
the Public Participation section of this
notice.
The FERC will be the lead federal
agency for the preparation of the EIS
and will prepare the document to satisfy
the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
document will be used by the FERC to
consider the environmental impacts that
could result if it authorizes Algonquin’s
Project by issuing a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity under
section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. It is the
FERC’s goal that other federal agencies
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60341
will participate in the environmental
review process as cooperating agencies
to satisfy their respective NEPA
responsibilities.
The Project must also undergo an
environmental review pursuant to the
Massachusetts Environmental Policy
Act (MEPA). The Massachusetts
Executive Office of Energy and
Environmental Affairs (MEEA) is the
lead state agency with responsibility for
ensuring compliance with the MEPA
regulations for interstate natural gas
pipeline projects. The MEPA regulations
allow use of a Special Review Procedure
that would establish a coordinated
review of the Project by the FERC and
the MEEA. Establishment of a
coordinated review would enable the
NEPA EIS (plus an addendum
document) to serve as the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
required by MEPA. It is anticipated that
the FERC and the MEEA will conduct a
coordinated NEPA/MEPA review of the
E2W Project to the maximum extent
feasible.
The Massachusetts Energy Facility
Siting Board (MEFSB) is an independent
board that licenses major energy
facilities in Massachusetts and is
charged with ensuring a reliable energy
supply for the Commonwealth with a
minimum impact on the environment at
the lowest possible cost. The MEFSB
has no authority over the siting of
interstate natural gas facilities; however,
it represents the citizens of
Massachusetts before the FERC on cases
involving the construction of applicable
energy infrastructure in Massachusetts.
The two Massachusetts public scoping
meetings announced in this notice will
be joint scoping meetings with
participation by the MEFSB.
The Connecticut Siting Council (CSC)
is an independent board that licenses
major energy facilities in Connecticut.
The CSC regulates facility siting to
balance the need for adequate and
reliable public services at the lowest
reasonable cost to consumers with the
need to protect the environment and
ecology of the state. Similar to the
MEFSB, the CSC has no authority over
the siting of interstate natural gas
facilities; however, it may become a
party before the FERC on cases
involving the construction of applicable
energy infrastructure in Connecticut.
The CSC will participate in the FERC’s
Connecticut scoping meeting and will
announce independent hearings at a
later date.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
60342
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Notices
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
With this notice, we 1 are asking these
and other federal, state, and local
agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to
environmental issues and leaders of
tribal nations to cooperate formally with
us in the preparation of the EIS. These
agencies may choose to participate once
they have evaluated Algonquin’s
proposal relative to their
responsibilities. Agencies that would
like to request cooperating status should
follow the instructions for filing
comments described in the Public
Participation section of this notice.
This notice is being sent to affected
landowners, including landowners
potentially affected by some of the
alternatives under consideration;
federal, state, and local government
agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest
groups; Native American tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries
and newspapers. We encourage
government representatives to notify
their constituents of this planned
Project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by an
Algonquin representative about the
acquisition of an easement to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed
Project facilities. Algonquin would seek
to negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the Project is
approved by the FERC, that approval
conveys with it the right of eminent
domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in
accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility on My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Internet Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the FERC’s
proceedings.
Summary of the Proposed Project
Algonquin proposes to modify
portions of its existing pipeline system
in Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey.
The E2W Project consists of the
construction and operation of 46.1 miles
of various diameter pipeline and
associated ancillary pipeline facilities.
Of this total, 13.0 miles consist of new
1 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the
environmental staff of the FERC’s Office of Energy
Projects.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Oct 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
pipeline in Massachusetts and 33.1
miles consist of the replacement of
existing pipeline in Massachusetts and
Connecticut. A significant portion of the
46.1 miles of the proposed pipeline
facilities would be either within the
existing Algonquin right-of-way or
adjacent to an existing powerline rightof-way. No new right-of-way corridors
would be created based on the
alignment as currently proposed with
the exception of several minor
alignment deviations to facilitate
construction.
In addition, Algonquin proposes to
construct 2 new compressor stations in
Massachusetts, install over-pressure
protection regulation at 4 sites in
Massachusetts, and install minor
modifications at 5 existing compressor
stations and 29 existing meter stations
along Algonquin’s system in the 5
Project states as described below. A
general overview of the major Project
facilities is shown in Appendix 1.2
Specifically, the facilities proposed by
Algonquin include the following:
• I–10 Extension—construction of
approximately 13.0 miles of new 36inch-diameter pipeline in Norfolk
County, Massachusetts;
• Q–1 System Replacement—
installation of approximately 18.5 miles
of 36-inch-diameter pipeline that would
replace a segment of an existing 24inch-diameter pipeline in Norfolk
County, Massachusetts;
• E–3 System Replacement—
installation of approximately 11.0 miles
of 12-inch-diameter pipeline that would
replace a segment of an existing 6- and
4-inch-diameter pipeline in New
London County, Connecticut;
• C–1 System Replacement—
installation of approximately 3.6 miles
of 24-inch-diameter pipeline that would
replace a segment of an existing 10inch-diameter pipeline in New Haven
County, Connecticut;
• Two new compressor stations
including:
Æ Boxford Compressor Station—a
10,300-horsepower (hp) compressor
station in Essex County, Massachusetts;
and
Æ Rehoboth Compressor Station—a
15,000-hp compressor station in Bristol
County, Massachusetts;
2 The appendices referenced in this notice are not
being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all
appendices are available on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov) at the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s Public
Reference Room at (202) 502–8371. For instructions
on connecting to eLibrary, refer to the Availability
of Additional Information section of this notice.
Copies of the appendices were sent to all those
receiving this notice in the mail. Requests for
detailed maps of the proposed facilities should be
made directly to Algonquin by calling 1–800–788–
4143.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Modifications to five existing
compressor stations to accommodate bidirectional flow along Algonquin’s
system including:
Æ Burrillville Compressor Station
in Providence County, Rhode Island;
Æ Chaplin Compressor Station in
Windham County, Connecticut;
Æ Cromwell Compressor Station in
Middlesex County, Connecticut;
Æ Southeast Compressor Station in
Putnam County, New York; and
Æ Hanover Compressor Station in
Morris County, New Jersey;
• Aboveground over-pressure
protection regulation at two existing
meter stations (Weymouth and Sharon
Meter Stations) and at two new
regulator stations (end of the I–10
Extension and end of the Q–1 System)
along the Algonquin system in
Massachusetts;
• Installation of gas chromatographs
at 29 existing meter stations in
Massachusetts (9), Connecticut (11),
Rhode Island (2), New York (5), and
New Jersey (2);
• Installation of mainline valves
along the proposed pipeline facilities in
Massachusetts and Connecticut; and
• Installation of pig 3 launcher and
receiver facilities to connect with the
existing Algonquin facilities in
Massachusetts and Connecticut.
Algonquin indicates that the proposed
Project would provide increased natural
gas supplies and enhanced system
reliability to natural gas distributors
throughout the New England region.
Once completed, the Project would be
capable of transporting up to 1.145
million dekatherms per day of natural
gas from increased gas supplies,
including liquefied natural gas-source
gas, entering the eastern end of the
Algonquin system for redelivery to high
growth markets in the Northeast region.
Algonquin anticipates that
construction of the E2W Project would
begin in April 2009, with a projected inservice date of November 2009.
Land Requirements for Construction
Algonquin indicates that construction
of its proposed pipeline and
aboveground facilities would require
about 482 acres of land, including land
requirements for the construction rightof-way, temporary extra work areas,
access roads, pipe storage and
contractor yards, and aboveground
facilities. Following construction, about
253 acres of land would be retained as
permanent right-of-way for the pipeline
and operation of the aboveground
3 A pig is an internal tool that can be used to
clean and dry a pipeline and/or to inspect it for
damage or corrosion.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Notices
facility sites. The remaining 229 acres of
land would be restored and allowed to
revert to its former use.
The centerline of the proposed I–10
Extension pipeline would generally be
situated 5 feet inside the existing
NSTAR Gas & Electric Corporation
(NSTAR) powerline right-of-way. The
pipelines for the Q–1, E–3, and C–1
Systems would be installed in the same
trench as the pipelines they are
replacing to the extent practicable. This
same-trench replacement method of
construction is referred to by Algonquin
as the take-up and relay method. In
general, the construction rights-of-way
for the new and replacement pipelines
would range from 75 to 85 feet wide
with additional temporary workspace
needed at certain feature crossings and
to stockpile trench spoil and rock
generated from trench excavation. For
the majority of the route, the
construction rights-of-way would
overlap the existing, cleared permanent
rights-of-way of Algonquin and NSTAR
by various amounts. After construction,
a 30-to 50-foot-wide permanent right-ofway would be retained.
The proposed Boxford Compressor
Station would require approximately 8.2
acres of land for permanent
development of the compressor station
and associated roads and piping.
However, Algonquin is considering the
acquisition of land parcels totaling
approximately 157 acres for the station.
An alternative site to the Boxford
Compressor Station, referred to as the
Danvers Compressor Station Site
Alternative, is also under consideration.
The alternative site is approximately 50
acres in size and is located northwest
and adjacent to the Danvers Landfill.
The proposed Rehoboth Compressor
Station would require approximately 8.8
acres of land for permanent
development of the compressor station
and associated roads and piping.
Algonquin is considering the
acquisition of land parcels totaling
approximately 97 acres for the Rehoboth
Compressor Station.
The modifications to the five existing
compressor stations would occur within
the fenceline of the existing developed
compressor station sites. The overpressure protection regulation at the two
existing meter stations would be
installed within previously disturbed
areas at the meter station sites. The
over-pressure regulator stations at the
two new sites would require
approximately 1 acre at each site. The
installation of gas chromatographs at the
29 existing meter stations along the
Algonquin system would occur within
the fenceline of the existing developed
meter station site. The mainline valves
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Oct 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
and pig launchers and receivers would
be installed within the permanent rightof-way and would not require additional
land.
The EIS Process
NEPA requires the FERC to take into
account the environmental impacts that
could result from an action whenever it
considers the issuance of a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity. The
EIS we are preparing is intended to give
the FERC and cooperating agencies the
necessary information to consider
potential environmental impacts during
each agency’s respective review.
Although no formal application has
been filed with the FERC, we have
already initiated our NEPA review
under the FERC’s Pre-Filing Process,
which was established in Docket No.
RM05–31–000 and Order No. 665. The
purpose of the Pre-Filing Process is to
encourage the early involvement of
interested stakeholders and to identify
and resolve issues before an application
is filed with the FERC. The MEEA,
MEFSB, and CSC have agreed to begin
their reviews in conjunction with the
Pre-Filing Process to the extent feasible.
A diagram summarizing the
environmental review process for the
Project is attached to this notice as
Appendix 2.
The FERC staff has already started to
meet with Algonquin, jurisdictional
agencies, and other interested
stakeholders to discuss the Project and
identify issues and concerns. As part of
our Pre-Filing Process review,
representatives from the FERC
participated in public open houses
sponsored by Algonquin in the Project
area between September 25 and October
11, 2007 to explain the environmental
review process to interested
stakeholders and take comments about
the Project. During November 2007, we
plan to continue the Pre-Filing Process
review by conducting interagency and
public scoping meetings in the Project
area to solicit comments and concerns
about the Project.
By this notice, we are formally
announcing our preparation of the EIS
and requesting additional agency and
public comments to help us focus the
analysis in the EIS on the potentially
significant environmental issues related
to the proposed action. If you provide
comments at a scoping meeting, you do
not need to resubmit the same
comments in response to this notice.
Our independent analysis of the
issues will be included in a draft EIS.
The draft EIS will be mailed to federal,
state, and local government agencies;
elected officials; environmental and
public interest groups; Native American
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60343
tribes; affected and potentially affected
landowners; other interested parties;
local libraries and newspapers; and the
FERC’s official service list for this
proceeding. A 45-day comment period
will be allotted for review of the draft
EIS. We will consider all timely
comments on the draft EIS and revise
the document, as necessary, before
issuing a final EIS. The comment period
on the draft EIS will be coordinated to
the extent possible with other
jurisdictional agencies.
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
The EIS will discuss impacts that
could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the
proposed Project. We have already
identified a number of issues and
alternatives that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review
of the proposed facilities, the
environmental information provided by
Algonquin, and the scoping comments
received to date. This preliminary list of
issues and alternatives may be changed
based on your comments and our
additional analysis.
• Geology and Soils:
Æ Assessment of potential
geological hazards.
Æ Erosion and sedimentation
control.
Æ Assessment of invasive weed
control plans.
Æ Right-of-way restoration.
• Water Resources:
Æ Impact on groundwater supplies.
Æ Evaluation of temporary and
permanent impacts on wetlands,
restoration of wetlands, and
development of appropriate wetland
mitigation options.
Æ Effect of pipeline crossings on
perennial and intermittent waterbodies,
including Norwichtown Brook, Bobbin
Mill Brook, Main Brook, Honeypot
Brook, and an unnamed tributary to the
Quinnipiac River.
Æ Assessment of methods to cross
major waterbodies, including the
Weymouth Fore, Charles, and Neponset
Rivers in Massachusetts and the
Shetucket River in Connecticut.
Æ Assessment of contingency plans
for frac-outs associated with horizontal
directional drills.
Æ Assessment of alternative
waterbody crossing methods.
• Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation:
Æ Effect on coldwater and sensitive
fisheries and essential fish habitat.
Æ Impacts on vernal pools.
Æ Effect on wildlife resources and
their habitat.
Æ Effect on migratory birds.
Æ Assessment of construction time
window restrictions.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
60344
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Notices
Æ Effect on riparian vegetation.
Æ Assessment of measures to
successfully revegetate the right-of-way.
• Special Status Species:
Æ Potential effect on federally
listed species.
Æ Potential effect on state-listed
sensitive species, including the Eastern
box turtle, bridle shiner, oak hairstreak,
mocha emerald, and blue-spotted
salamander.
• Cultural Resources:
Æ Effect on historic and prehistoric
sites.
Æ Native American and tribal
concerns.
• Land Use, Recreation and Special
Interest Areas, and Visual Resources:
Æ Impacts on residential areas.
Æ Blasting in proximity to
residences.
Æ Impacts on the Cranberry Brook
Watershed Area of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACEC).
Æ Visual impacts.
• Socioeconomics:
Æ Effects on transportation and
traffic.
Æ Effects of construction workforce
demands on public services and
temporary housing.
• Air Quality and Noise:
Æ Effects on the local air quality
and noise environment from
construction and operation of the
proposed facilities.
• Reliability and Safety:
Æ Assessment of hazards associated
with natural gas pipelines.
• Alternatives:
Æ Assessment of existing systems,
alternative system configurations, and
alternative routes to reduce or avoid
environmental impacts.
Æ Evaluation of alternatives to
avoid the Cranberry Brook Watershed
ACEC.
Æ Assessment of alternative
compressor station locations, including
the Danvers Compressor Station Site
Alternative to the Boxford Compressor
Station.
• Cumulative Impact:
Æ Assessment of the effect of the
proposed Project when combined with
other past, present, or future actions in
the same region.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about
Algonquin’s proposal. By becoming a
commentor, your concerns will be
addressed in the FERC’s EIS and
considered during the MEPA review.
Your comments should focus on the
potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to
avoid or lessen the environmental
impact. The more specific your
comments, the more useful they will be.
To expedite our receipt and
consideration of your comments, the
Commission strongly encourages
electronic submission of any comments
on this Project. See Title 18 Code of
Federal Regulations 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Internet Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov under the ‘‘eFiling’’
link and the link to the User’s Guide.
Before you can submit comments you
will need to create a free account by
clicking on ‘‘Sign-up’’ under ‘‘New
User.’’ You will be asked to select the
type of submission you are making. This
type of submission is considered a
‘‘Comment on Filing.’’ Your comments
must be submitted electronically by
November 21, 2007.
If you wish to mail comments, please
mail your comments so that they will be
received in Washington, DC and Boston,
Massachusetts on or before November
21, 2007 and carefully follow these
instructions:
Send an original and two copies of
your letter to:
• Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St., NE., Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426;
• Label one copy of your comments
for the attention of the Gas Branch 3,
DG2E;
• Reference Docket No. PF07–15–000
on the original and both copies; and
• Send an additional copy of your
letter to:
Selma H. Urman, Esq., Massachusetts
Energy Facilities Siting Board, One
South Station, Boston, MA 02110; or
Christine Lepage, Connecticut Siting
Council, Ten Franklin Square, New
Britain, CT 06051.
Your letters to the MEFSB or CSC
should also reference Docket No. PF07–
15–000.
Three public scoping meetings have
been scheduled in the Project area to
provide another opportunity to offer
comments on the proposed Project. The
two public scoping meetings in
Massachusetts will be joint scoping
meetings with participation by the
MEFSB pursuant to its responsibilities
outlined in 980 Code of Massachusetts
Regulations section 7.07(9)(a).4
Interested groups and individuals are
encouraged to attend the meetings and
to present comments on the
environmental issues they believe
should be addressed in the EIS. A
transcript of the meetings will be
generated so that your comments will be
accurately recorded. All meetings will
begin at 7 p.m. (EST) and end at 10
p.m., at the following locations:
Date
Location
Monday, November 5, 2007 ..............................................
Holiday Inn Boston-Randolph, 1374 North Main Street, Randolph, MA 02368, (781)
961–1000.
Knights of Columbus Hall, 505 Sutton Street, North Andover, MA 01845, (978) 688–
6812.
Norwich City Hall, Room 335, 100 Broadway, Norwich, CT 06360.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 ........................................
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Thursday, November 8, 2007 ............................................
Once Algonquin formally files its
application with the Commission, you
may want to become an ‘‘intervenor,’’
which is an official party to the
proceeding. Intervenors play a more
formal role in the process and are able
to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be
heard by the courts if they choose to
appeal the Commission’s final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in a
Commission proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for
becoming an intervenor are included in
the User’s Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’
link on the Commission’s Web site.
Please note that you may not request
intervenor status at this time. You must
wait until a formal application is filed
with the Commission.
Environmental Mailing List
Everyone who responds to this notice
or provides comments throughout the
EIS process will be retained on the
mailing list. If you do not want to send
4 A separate scoping meeting for the MEPA
process will be scheduled by the MEEA at a later
date.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Oct 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Notices
comments at this time but still want to
stay informed and receive copies of the
draft and final EISs, you must return the
Mailing List Retention Form (Appendix
3). If you do not send comments or
return the Mailing List Retention Form
asking to remain on the mailing list, you
will be taken off the mailing list.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Availability of Additional Information
Additional information about the
Project is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs
at 1–866–208 FERC or on the FERC
Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov)
using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ‘‘General
Search,’’ and enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the
Docket Number field (i.e., PF07–15). Be
sure you have selected an appropriate
date range. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free
at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY, contact
(202) 502–8659. The eLibrary link on
the FERC Internet Web site also
provides access to the texts of formal
documents issued by the Commission,
such as Orders, notices, and
rulemakings.
In addition, the FERC now offers a
free service called eSubscription that
allows you to keep track of all formal
issuances and submittals in specific
dockets. This can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings
by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document
summaries, and direct links to the
documents. To register for this service,
go to https://www.ferc.gov/
esubscribenow.htm.
Public meetings or site visits will be
posted on the Commission’s calendar
located at https://www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
To request additional information on
the proposed Project or to provide
comments directly to the Project
sponsor, you can contact Algonquin by
calling toll free at 1–800–788–4143.
Also, Algonquin has established an
Internet Web site at https://
www.easttowestexpansion.com. The
Web site includes a description of the
Project, an overview map of the pipeline
route, links to related documents, and
photographs of the Project area.
Algonquin will update the Web site as
the environmental review of its Project
proceeds.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–20874 Filed 10–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Oct 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
Summary of the Proposed Project
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP07–427–000]
PetroLogistics Natural Gas Storage,
LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the
Proposed PetroLogistics Gas Storage
Project and Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues
October 17, 2007.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of
the PetroLogistics Gas Storage Project
involving construction and operation of
facilities by PetroLogistics Natural Gas
Storage, LLC (PetroLogistics) in Iberville
Parish, Louisiana.1 These facilities
would consist of one injection/
withdrawal storage well, various
diameter gas header, intereconnect, and
lateral pipelines totaling 13.73 miles,
one new 20,000 horsepower (hp)
electric compressor station, five meter
stations and two mainline valves. This
EA will be used by the Commission in
its decision-making process to
determine whether the project is in the
public convenience and necessity.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by a
pipeline company representative about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
proposed facilities. The pipeline
company would seek to negotiate a
mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the project is approved by
the Commission, that approval conveys
with it the right of eminent domain.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail
to produce an agreement, the pipeline
company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ was attached to the project
notice PetroLogistics provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a
number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the
Commission’s proceedings. It is
available for viewing on the FERC
Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov).
1 PetroLogistics’s application was filed with the
Commission under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act
and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60345
PetroLogistics proposes to build and
operate a high-deliverability, multicycle natural gas storage facility and
appurtenant facilities in an existing
brine cavern in the Choctaw Salt Dome
located 4 miles northwest of the city of
Plaquemine, Louisiana. The project
would use one cavern within the
Choctaw Salt Dome which currently is
the site of up to nine caverns used as
part of the U.S. Strategic Petroleum
Reserve operated by the U.S.
Department of Energy. This project
would provide a working gas capacity of
approximately 9 billion cubic feet and
maximum daily injection and
withdrawal capabilities of up to 150 to
300 million cubic feet per day.
PetroLogistics seeks authority to
construct and operate:
• One 20,000 hp electric compressor
station on a 2 acre site;
• One 350-foot-long 24-inch-diameter
interconnect pipeline;
• 7.3 miles of 24-inch-diameter
natural gas header pipeline connecting
the compressor station and the Florida
Gas Transmission Company (FGT),
CrossTex LIG Pipeline Company
(Crosstex)/Bridgeline Pipeline System
(Bridgeline) and Texas Eastern
Transmission Company (TETCO)
interconnects;
• 5.83 miles of 16-inch-diameter
interconnect pipeline from the
Bridgeline/CrossTex tie-in to the
Southern Natural Gas Company
(SONAT) pipeline interconnect;
• A 0.60-mile-long TETCO lateral
from the TETCO Lateral Meter Station;
five meter stations/interconnects (FGT,
Bridgeline, Crosstex, TETCO and
SONAT Meter Stations);
• And two mainline valves.
PetroLogistics requests certification
by December 31, 2007.
The location of the project facilities is
shown in Appendix 1.2
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the proposed facilities
would require disturbance of 137 acres
of land, including 47 acres under
existing permanent easement, 40 acres
to be added as new permanent easement
or ownership, and 53 acres as temporary
construction right-of-way that would be
restored to previous land use following
2 The appendices referenced in this notice are not
being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all
appendices, other than Appendix 1 (maps), are
available on the Commission’s Web site at the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20426, or call (202) 502–8371. For instructions
on connecting to eLibrary refer to the last page of
this notice. Copies of the appendices were sent to
all those receiving this notice in the mail.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60341-60345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. PF07-15-000]
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed East to West Hubline
Expansion Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and
Notice of Public Scoping Meetings
October 16, 2007.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that
will identify and address the environmental impacts that could result
from the construction and operation of the East to West HubLine
Expansion Project (E2W Project or Project). The E2W Project is proposed
by Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC (Algonquin), which is an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of Spectra Energy Corp. The Commission will use
the EIS in its decision-making process to determine whether or not to
authorize the Project. This notice describes the proposed Project
facilities and explains the scoping process that will be used to gather
input from the public and interested agencies on the Project. Your
input will help determine the issues that need to be evaluated in the
EIS. Please note that the scoping period for the Project will close on
November 21, 2007.
Comments on the Project may be submitted in written form or
verbally. In lieu of or in addition to sending written comments, you
are invited to attend the public scoping meetings that have been
scheduled in the Project area. These meetings are scheduled for
November 5, 2007 in Randolph, Massachusetts; November 7, 2007 in North
Andover, Massachusetts; and November 8, 2007 in Norwich, Connecticut.
Further instructions on how to submit comments and additional details
of the public scoping meetings are provided in the Public Participation
section of this notice.
The FERC will be the lead federal agency for the preparation of the
EIS and will prepare the document to satisfy the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The document will be used by
the FERC to consider the environmental impacts that could result if it
authorizes Algonquin's Project by issuing a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. It is
the FERC's goal that other federal agencies will participate in the
environmental review process as cooperating agencies to satisfy their
respective NEPA responsibilities.
The Project must also undergo an environmental review pursuant to
the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). The Massachusetts
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (MEEA) is the lead
state agency with responsibility for ensuring compliance with the MEPA
regulations for interstate natural gas pipeline projects. The MEPA
regulations allow use of a Special Review Procedure that would
establish a coordinated review of the Project by the FERC and the MEEA.
Establishment of a coordinated review would enable the NEPA EIS (plus
an addendum document) to serve as the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
required by MEPA. It is anticipated that the FERC and the MEEA will
conduct a coordinated NEPA/MEPA review of the E2W Project to the
maximum extent feasible.
The Massachusetts Energy Facility Siting Board (MEFSB) is an
independent board that licenses major energy facilities in
Massachusetts and is charged with ensuring a reliable energy supply for
the Commonwealth with a minimum impact on the environment at the lowest
possible cost. The MEFSB has no authority over the siting of interstate
natural gas facilities; however, it represents the citizens of
Massachusetts before the FERC on cases involving the construction of
applicable energy infrastructure in Massachusetts. The two
Massachusetts public scoping meetings announced in this notice will be
joint scoping meetings with participation by the MEFSB.
The Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) is an independent board that
licenses major energy facilities in Connecticut. The CSC regulates
facility siting to balance the need for adequate and reliable public
services at the lowest reasonable cost to consumers with the need to
protect the environment and ecology of the state. Similar to the MEFSB,
the CSC has no authority over the siting of interstate natural gas
facilities; however, it may become a party before the FERC on cases
involving the construction of applicable energy infrastructure in
Connecticut. The CSC will participate in the FERC's Connecticut scoping
meeting and will announce independent hearings at a later date.
[[Page 60342]]
With this notice, we \1\ are asking these and other federal, state,
and local agencies with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with
respect to environmental issues and leaders of tribal nations to
cooperate formally with us in the preparation of the EIS. These
agencies may choose to participate once they have evaluated Algonquin's
proposal relative to their responsibilities. Agencies that would like
to request cooperating status should follow the instructions for filing
comments described in the Public Participation section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the FERC's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is being sent to affected landowners, including
landowners potentially affected by some of the alternatives under
consideration; federal, state, and local government agencies; elected
officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native American
tribes; other interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers.
We encourage government representatives to notify their constituents of
this planned Project and encourage them to comment on their areas of
concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this notice, you may be contacted
by an Algonquin representative about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed Project facilities.
Algonquin would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the Project is approved by the FERC, that approval conveys
with it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility on My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov). This fact
sheet addresses a number of typically asked questions, including the
use of eminent domain and how to participate in the FERC's proceedings.
Summary of the Proposed Project
Algonquin proposes to modify portions of its existing pipeline
system in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and New
Jersey. The E2W Project consists of the construction and operation of
46.1 miles of various diameter pipeline and associated ancillary
pipeline facilities. Of this total, 13.0 miles consist of new pipeline
in Massachusetts and 33.1 miles consist of the replacement of existing
pipeline in Massachusetts and Connecticut. A significant portion of the
46.1 miles of the proposed pipeline facilities would be either within
the existing Algonquin right-of-way or adjacent to an existing
powerline right-of-way. No new right-of-way corridors would be created
based on the alignment as currently proposed with the exception of
several minor alignment deviations to facilitate construction.
In addition, Algonquin proposes to construct 2 new compressor
stations in Massachusetts, install over-pressure protection regulation
at 4 sites in Massachusetts, and install minor modifications at 5
existing compressor stations and 29 existing meter stations along
Algonquin's system in the 5 Project states as described below. A
general overview of the major Project facilities is shown in Appendix
1.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all appendices are
available on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) at the ``eLibrary'' link or from the Commission's
Public Reference Room at (202) 502-8371. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the Availability of Additional
Information section of this notice. Copies of the appendices were
sent to all those receiving this notice in the mail. Requests for
detailed maps of the proposed facilities should be made directly to
Algonquin by calling 1-800-788-4143.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the facilities proposed by Algonquin include the
following:
I-10 Extension--construction of approximately 13.0 miles
of new 36-inch-diameter pipeline in Norfolk County, Massachusetts;
Q-1 System Replacement--installation of approximately 18.5
miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline that would replace a segment of an
existing 24-inch-diameter pipeline in Norfolk County, Massachusetts;
E-3 System Replacement--installation of approximately 11.0
miles of 12-inch-diameter pipeline that would replace a segment of an
existing 6- and 4-inch-diameter pipeline in New London County,
Connecticut;
C-1 System Replacement--installation of approximately 3.6
miles of 24-inch-diameter pipeline that would replace a segment of an
existing 10-inch-diameter pipeline in New Haven County, Connecticut;
Two new compressor stations including:
[cir] Boxford Compressor Station--a 10,300-horsepower (hp)
compressor station in Essex County, Massachusetts; and
[cir] Rehoboth Compressor Station--a 15,000-hp compressor station
in Bristol County, Massachusetts;
Modifications to five existing compressor stations to
accommodate bi-directional flow along Algonquin's system including:
[cir] Burrillville Compressor Station in Providence County, Rhode
Island;
[cir] Chaplin Compressor Station in Windham County, Connecticut;
[cir] Cromwell Compressor Station in Middlesex County,
Connecticut;
[cir] Southeast Compressor Station in Putnam County, New York; and
[cir] Hanover Compressor Station in Morris County, New Jersey;
Aboveground over-pressure protection regulation at two
existing meter stations (Weymouth and Sharon Meter Stations) and at two
new regulator stations (end of the I-10 Extension and end of the Q-1
System) along the Algonquin system in Massachusetts;
Installation of gas chromatographs at 29 existing meter
stations in Massachusetts (9), Connecticut (11), Rhode Island (2), New
York (5), and New Jersey (2);
Installation of mainline valves along the proposed
pipeline facilities in Massachusetts and Connecticut; and
Installation of pig \3\ launcher and receiver facilities
to connect with the existing Algonquin facilities in Massachusetts and
Connecticut.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A pig is an internal tool that can be used to clean and dry
a pipeline and/or to inspect it for damage or corrosion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algonquin indicates that the proposed Project would provide
increased natural gas supplies and enhanced system reliability to
natural gas distributors throughout the New England region. Once
completed, the Project would be capable of transporting up to 1.145
million dekatherms per day of natural gas from increased gas supplies,
including liquefied natural gas-source gas, entering the eastern end of
the Algonquin system for redelivery to high growth markets in the
Northeast region.
Algonquin anticipates that construction of the E2W Project would
begin in April 2009, with a projected in-service date of November 2009.
Land Requirements for Construction
Algonquin indicates that construction of its proposed pipeline and
aboveground facilities would require about 482 acres of land, including
land requirements for the construction right-of-way, temporary extra
work areas, access roads, pipe storage and contractor yards, and
aboveground facilities. Following construction, about 253 acres of land
would be retained as permanent right-of-way for the pipeline and
operation of the aboveground
[[Page 60343]]
facility sites. The remaining 229 acres of land would be restored and
allowed to revert to its former use.
The centerline of the proposed I-10 Extension pipeline would
generally be situated 5 feet inside the existing NSTAR Gas & Electric
Corporation (NSTAR) powerline right-of-way. The pipelines for the Q-1,
E-3, and C-1 Systems would be installed in the same trench as the
pipelines they are replacing to the extent practicable. This same-
trench replacement method of construction is referred to by Algonquin
as the take-up and relay method. In general, the construction rights-
of-way for the new and replacement pipelines would range from 75 to 85
feet wide with additional temporary workspace needed at certain feature
crossings and to stockpile trench spoil and rock generated from trench
excavation. For the majority of the route, the construction rights-of-
way would overlap the existing, cleared permanent rights-of-way of
Algonquin and NSTAR by various amounts. After construction, a 30-to 50-
foot-wide permanent right-of-way would be retained.
The proposed Boxford Compressor Station would require approximately
8.2 acres of land for permanent development of the compressor station
and associated roads and piping. However, Algonquin is considering the
acquisition of land parcels totaling approximately 157 acres for the
station. An alternative site to the Boxford Compressor Station,
referred to as the Danvers Compressor Station Site Alternative, is also
under consideration. The alternative site is approximately 50 acres in
size and is located northwest and adjacent to the Danvers Landfill. The
proposed Rehoboth Compressor Station would require approximately 8.8
acres of land for permanent development of the compressor station and
associated roads and piping. Algonquin is considering the acquisition
of land parcels totaling approximately 97 acres for the Rehoboth
Compressor Station.
The modifications to the five existing compressor stations would
occur within the fenceline of the existing developed compressor station
sites. The over-pressure protection regulation at the two existing
meter stations would be installed within previously disturbed areas at
the meter station sites. The over-pressure regulator stations at the
two new sites would require approximately 1 acre at each site. The
installation of gas chromatographs at the 29 existing meter stations
along the Algonquin system would occur within the fenceline of the
existing developed meter station site. The mainline valves and pig
launchers and receivers would be installed within the permanent right-
of-way and would not require additional land.
The EIS Process
NEPA requires the FERC to take into account the environmental
impacts that could result from an action whenever it considers the
issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. The EIS
we are preparing is intended to give the FERC and cooperating agencies
the necessary information to consider potential environmental impacts
during each agency's respective review.
Although no formal application has been filed with the FERC, we
have already initiated our NEPA review under the FERC's Pre-Filing
Process, which was established in Docket No. RM05-31-000 and Order No.
665. The purpose of the Pre-Filing Process is to encourage the early
involvement of interested stakeholders and to identify and resolve
issues before an application is filed with the FERC. The MEEA, MEFSB,
and CSC have agreed to begin their reviews in conjunction with the Pre-
Filing Process to the extent feasible. A diagram summarizing the
environmental review process for the Project is attached to this notice
as Appendix 2.
The FERC staff has already started to meet with Algonquin,
jurisdictional agencies, and other interested stakeholders to discuss
the Project and identify issues and concerns. As part of our Pre-Filing
Process review, representatives from the FERC participated in public
open houses sponsored by Algonquin in the Project area between
September 25 and October 11, 2007 to explain the environmental review
process to interested stakeholders and take comments about the Project.
During November 2007, we plan to continue the Pre-Filing Process review
by conducting interagency and public scoping meetings in the Project
area to solicit comments and concerns about the Project.
By this notice, we are formally announcing our preparation of the
EIS and requesting additional agency and public comments to help us
focus the analysis in the EIS on the potentially significant
environmental issues related to the proposed action. If you provide
comments at a scoping meeting, you do not need to resubmit the same
comments in response to this notice.
Our independent analysis of the issues will be included in a draft
EIS. The draft EIS will be mailed to federal, state, and local
government agencies; elected officials; environmental and public
interest groups; Native American tribes; affected and potentially
affected landowners; other interested parties; local libraries and
newspapers; and the FERC's official service list for this proceeding. A
45-day comment period will be allotted for review of the draft EIS. We
will consider all timely comments on the draft EIS and revise the
document, as necessary, before issuing a final EIS. The comment period
on the draft EIS will be coordinated to the extent possible with other
jurisdictional agencies.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
The EIS will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the proposed Project. We have already
identified a number of issues and alternatives that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities, the
environmental information provided by Algonquin, and the scoping
comments received to date. This preliminary list of issues and
alternatives may be changed based on your comments and our additional
analysis.
Geology and Soils:
[cir] Assessment of potential geological hazards.
[cir] Erosion and sedimentation control.
[cir] Assessment of invasive weed control plans.
[cir] Right-of-way restoration.
Water Resources:
[cir] Impact on groundwater supplies.
[cir] Evaluation of temporary and permanent impacts on wetlands,
restoration of wetlands, and development of appropriate wetland
mitigation options.
[cir] Effect of pipeline crossings on perennial and intermittent
waterbodies, including Norwichtown Brook, Bobbin Mill Brook, Main
Brook, Honeypot Brook, and an unnamed tributary to the Quinnipiac
River.
[cir] Assessment of methods to cross major waterbodies, including
the Weymouth Fore, Charles, and Neponset Rivers in Massachusetts and
the Shetucket River in Connecticut.
[cir] Assessment of contingency plans for frac-outs associated
with horizontal directional drills.
[cir] Assessment of alternative waterbody crossing methods.
Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation:
[cir] Effect on coldwater and sensitive fisheries and essential
fish habitat.
[cir] Impacts on vernal pools.
[cir] Effect on wildlife resources and their habitat.
[cir] Effect on migratory birds.
[cir] Assessment of construction time window restrictions.
[[Page 60344]]
[cir] Effect on riparian vegetation.
[cir] Assessment of measures to successfully revegetate the right-
of-way.
Special Status Species:
[cir] Potential effect on federally listed species.
[cir] Potential effect on state-listed sensitive species,
including the Eastern box turtle, bridle shiner, oak hairstreak, mocha
emerald, and blue-spotted salamander.
Cultural Resources:
[cir] Effect on historic and prehistoric sites.
[cir] Native American and tribal concerns.
Land Use, Recreation and Special Interest Areas, and
Visual Resources:
[cir] Impacts on residential areas.
[cir] Blasting in proximity to residences.
[cir] Impacts on the Cranberry Brook Watershed Area of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACEC).
[cir] Visual impacts.
Socioeconomics:
[cir] Effects on transportation and traffic.
[cir] Effects of construction workforce demands on public services
and temporary housing.
Air Quality and Noise:
[cir] Effects on the local air quality and noise environment from
construction and operation of the proposed facilities.
Reliability and Safety:
[cir] Assessment of hazards associated with natural gas pipelines.
Alternatives:
[cir] Assessment of existing systems, alternative system
configurations, and alternative routes to reduce or avoid environmental
impacts.
[cir] Evaluation of alternatives to avoid the Cranberry Brook
Watershed ACEC.
[cir] Assessment of alternative compressor station locations,
including the Danvers Compressor Station Site Alternative to the
Boxford Compressor Station.
Cumulative Impact:
[cir] Assessment of the effect of the proposed Project when
combined with other past, present, or future actions in the same
region.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about Algonquin's proposal. By becoming a
commentor, your concerns will be addressed in the FERC's EIS and
considered during the MEPA review. Your comments should focus on the
potential environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures
to avoid or lessen the environmental impact. The more specific your
comments, the more useful they will be. To expedite our receipt and
consideration of your comments, the Commission strongly encourages
electronic submission of any comments on this Project. See Title 18
Code of Federal Regulations 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on
the Commission's Internet Web site at https://www.ferc.gov under the
``eFiling'' link and the link to the User's Guide. Before you can
submit comments you will need to create a free account by clicking on
``Sign-up'' under ``New User.'' You will be asked to select the type of
submission you are making. This type of submission is considered a
``Comment on Filing.'' Your comments must be submitted electronically
by November 21, 2007.
If you wish to mail comments, please mail your comments so that
they will be received in Washington, DC and Boston, Massachusetts on or
before November 21, 2007 and carefully follow these instructions:
Send an original and two copies of your letter to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First St., NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
Label one copy of your comments for the attention of the
Gas Branch 3, DG2E;
Reference Docket No. PF07-15-000 on the original and both
copies; and
Send an additional copy of your letter to:
Selma H. Urman, Esq., Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board, One
South Station, Boston, MA 02110; or
Christine Lepage, Connecticut Siting Council, Ten Franklin Square, New
Britain, CT 06051.
Your letters to the MEFSB or CSC should also reference Docket No.
PF07-15-000.
Three public scoping meetings have been scheduled in the Project
area to provide another opportunity to offer comments on the proposed
Project. The two public scoping meetings in Massachusetts will be joint
scoping meetings with participation by the MEFSB pursuant to its
responsibilities outlined in 980 Code of Massachusetts Regulations
section 7.07(9)(a).\4\ Interested groups and individuals are encouraged
to attend the meetings and to present comments on the environmental
issues they believe should be addressed in the EIS. A transcript of the
meetings will be generated so that your comments will be accurately
recorded. All meetings will begin at 7 p.m. (EST) and end at 10 p.m.,
at the following locations:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A separate scoping meeting for the MEPA process will be
scheduled by the MEEA at a later date.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Location
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, November 5, 2007.......... Holiday Inn Boston-Randolph, 1374
North Main Street, Randolph, MA
02368, (781) 961-1000.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007....... Knights of Columbus Hall, 505 Sutton
Street, North Andover, MA 01845,
(978) 688-6812.
Thursday, November 8, 2007........ Norwich City Hall, Room 335, 100
Broadway, Norwich, CT 06360.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once Algonquin formally files its application with the Commission,
you may want to become an ``intervenor,'' which is an official party to
the proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the process and
are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard by the courts
if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling. An intervenor
formally participates in a Commission proceeding by filing a request to
intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are included in the
User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web site.
Please note that you may not request intervenor status at this time.
You must wait until a formal application is filed with the Commission.
Environmental Mailing List
Everyone who responds to this notice or provides comments
throughout the EIS process will be retained on the mailing list. If you
do not want to send
[[Page 60345]]
comments at this time but still want to stay informed and receive
copies of the draft and final EISs, you must return the Mailing List
Retention Form (Appendix 3). If you do not send comments or return the
Mailing List Retention Form asking to remain on the mailing list, you
will be taken off the mailing list.
Availability of Additional Information
Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at 1-866-208 FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov) using the ``eLibrary''
link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and
enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket
Number field (i.e., PF07-15). Be sure you have selected an appropriate
date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502-8659. The eLibrary link on the FERC Internet Web site
also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as Orders, notices, and rulemakings.
In addition, the FERC now offers a free service called
eSubscription that allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and
submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you
spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. To register for this service, go to https://www.ferc.gov/
esubscribenow.htm.
Public meetings or site visits will be posted on the Commission's
calendar located at https://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx
along with other related information.
To request additional information on the proposed Project or to
provide comments directly to the Project sponsor, you can contact
Algonquin by calling toll free at 1-800-788-4143. Also, Algonquin has
established an Internet Web site at https://www.easttowestexpansion.com.
The Web site includes a description of the Project, an overview map of
the pipeline route, links to related documents, and photographs of the
Project area. Algonquin will update the Web site as the environmental
review of its Project proceeds.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-20874 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P