Safety Zone: Army Corps of Engineers Blasting and Dredging Operation, Boston Harbor, Boston, MA, 59944-59947 [E7-20780]
Download as PDF
59944
§ 122.15
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
User fee airports.
*
*
(b) List of user fee airports. * * *
*
Location
Name
Addison, Texas .........................................................................................
Ardmore, Oklahoma .................................................................................
Bakersfield, California ...............................................................................
Bedford, Massachusetts ...........................................................................
Broomfield, Colorado ................................................................................
Carlsbad, California ..................................................................................
Daytona Beach, Florida ............................................................................
Decatur, Illinois .........................................................................................
Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey .........................................................
Englewood, Colorado ...............................................................................
Fort Worth, Texas .....................................................................................
Fresno, California .....................................................................................
Gypsum, Colorado ....................................................................................
Hillsboro, Oregon ......................................................................................
Johnson City, New York ...........................................................................
Leesburg, Florida ......................................................................................
Lexington, Kentucky .................................................................................
Manchester, New Hampshire ...................................................................
Mascoutah, Illinois ....................................................................................
McKinney, Texas ......................................................................................
Melbourne, Florida ....................................................................................
Mesa, Arizona ...........................................................................................
Midland, Texas .........................................................................................
Morristown, New Jersey ...........................................................................
Moses Lake, Washington .........................................................................
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina ..................................................................
Orlando, Florida ........................................................................................
Palm Springs, California ...........................................................................
Riverside, California .................................................................................
Rochester, Minnesota ...............................................................................
Rogers, Arkansas .....................................................................................
Roswell, New Mexico ...............................................................................
San Bernardino, California .......................................................................
Santa Maria, California .............................................................................
Sarasota, Florida ......................................................................................
Scottsdale, Arizona ...................................................................................
Sugar Land, Texas ...................................................................................
Trenton, New Jersey ................................................................................
Victorville, California .................................................................................
Waterford, Michigan .................................................................................
Waukegan, Illinois ....................................................................................
West Chicago, Illinois ...............................................................................
Wheeling, Illinois .......................................................................................
Wilmington, Ohio ......................................................................................
Yoder, Indiana ..........................................................................................
Ypsilanti, Michigan ....................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 18, 2007.
W. Ralph Basham,
Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. E7–20803 Filed 10–22–07; 8:45 am]
Addison Airport.
Ardmore Industrial Airpark.
Meadows Field Airport.
L.G. Hanscom Field.
Jefferson County Airport.
McClellan-Palomar Airport.
Daytona Beach International Airport.
Decatur Airport.
Atlantic City International Airport.
Centennial Airport.
Fort Worth Alliance Airport.
Fresno Yosemite International Airport.
Eagle County Regional Airport.
Hillsboro Airport.
Binghamton Regional Airport.
Leesburg Regional Airport.
Blue Grass Airport.
Manchester Airport.
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport.
Collin County Regional Airport.
Melbourne Airport.
Williams Gateway Airport.
Midland International Airport.
Morristown Municipal Airport.
Grant County International Airport.
Myrtle Beach International Airport.
Orlando Executive Airport.
Palm Springs International Airport.
March Inland Port Airport.
Rochester International Airport.
Rogers Municipal Airport.
Roswell Industrial Center.
San Bernardino International Airport.
Santa Maria Public Airport.
Sarasota/Bradenton International Airport.
Scottsdale Airport.
Sugar Land Regional Airport.
Trenton Mercer Airport.
Southern California Logistics Airport.
Oakland County International Airport.
Waukegan Regional Airport.
Dupage County Airport.
Chicago Executive Airport.
Airborne Air Park Airport.
Fort Wayne International Airport.
Willow Run Airport.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. CGD01–07–145]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
RIN 1625–AA00
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Safety Zone: Army Corps of Engineers
Blasting and Dredging Operation,
Boston Harbor, Boston, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing temporary safety zones in
Boston Harbor, Boston, Massachusetts,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:55 Oct 22, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE)
blasting and dredging operation, to
include the underwater blasting
locations and the vessel transporting
blasting material to and from the work
sites, between October 5, 2007 and
December 31, 2007. The zone
temporarily closes all navigable waters
of Boston Harbor within a four hundred
(400) yard radius of the four underwater
demolition sites located at approximate
positions 42°20′05.5″ N, 070°59′53.9″ W,
east-southeast of Castle Island;
42°20′19.0″ N, 070°58′46.5″ W,
President Roads Anchorage;
42°21′15.80″ N, 070°55′51.95″ W, North
Channel; 42°22′03.70″ N, 070°55′18.83″
W, North Channel, while blasting
operations are occurring and a moving
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
safety zone of one hundred yards
around the M/V EMILY ROSE. The
operations will only occur during
daylight hours. The safety zone is
necessary to protect the maritime public
from the potential hazards posed by the
blasting and dredging. Entry into this
zone is prohibited during the closure
period unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Boston, Massachusetts.
DATES: This rule is effective from 12:01
a.m. on October 5, 2007 until 11:59 p.m.
on December 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD01–07–
145 and are available for inspection or
copying at Sector Boston, 427
Commercial Street, Boston, MA,
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Eldridge McFadden, Sector
Boston, Waterways Management
Division, at (617) 223–5160.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. A notice
and comment period was not held for
this rulemaking because the logistics
with respect to the blasting and
dredging were not determined with
sufficient time to draft and publish an
NPRM. Delaying the necessary blasting
operations to accommodate a notice and
comment period would be contrary to
the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register as immediate action is needed
to protect vessels transiting the area
from the hazards associated with
underwater blasting and rock removal
operations. Any delay encountered in
this regulation’s effective date would be
contrary to the public interest since
immediate action is necessary to protect
persons, facilities, vessels and others in
the maritime community from the safety
hazards associated with the handling,
detonation, and transportation of
explosives.
Background and Purpose
The Army Corps of Engineers is
conducting a project to deepen Boston
Harbor. Within the shipping channels
there are several rock formations which
are impeding the progress of the work.
The Army Corps has contracted RDA
Construction to perform the associated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:55 Oct 22, 2007
Jkt 214001
blasting and dredging to remove the
rock. The explosives will be transferred
to and from the blasting sites aboard the
M/V EMILY ROSE. In order to protect
the maritime public from the hazards
associated with the loading, detonation,
and transportation of explosives in and
around the blasting areas, the Coast
Guard is establishing safety zones
around each of the four blasting sites
and a moving safety zone around the
vessel EMILY ROSE as it transits from
the loading point on the Fore River in
Quincy, Massachusetts to the blasting
sites and back. Entry into these zones
will be prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port.
Discussion of Rule
This rule establishes temporary safety
zones on the navigable waters of Boston
Harbor within a four hundred (400) yard
radius of the various rock sites located
in Boston Harbor at approximate
positions 42°20′05.5″ N, 070°59′53.9″ W,
east-southeast of Castle Island;
42°20′19.0″ N, 070°58′46.5″ W,
President Roads Anchorage;
42°21′15.80″ N, 070°55′51.95″ W, North
Channel; and, 42°22′03.70″ N,
070°55′18.83″ W, North Channel while
blasting and dredging is occurring. This
regulation also establishes a moving
safety zone on all navigable waters of
the Fore River and Boston Harbor in a
100 yard radius around the M/V EMILY
ROSE as it loads and unloads explosives
and transits from the Fore River to the
four demolition areas and from the
demolition areas back to the Fore River
shipyard. The explosives loading will
occur at the Fore River shipyard wet
dock in Quincy, Massachusetts. The
explosives will be transported via vessel
to the construction barges at the above
noted positions where the blasting and
dredging is occurring.
This rule is effective from 12:01 a.m.
EDT on October 5, 2007 until 11:59 p.m.
EST on December 31, 2007. Although
the safety zone will be in effect for
twelve weeks, it will only be enforced
during actual transit and blasting times.
Blasting will only occur during daylight
hours.
Marine traffic may transit safely
outside of the zone during the
enforcement period. Public notifications
will be made prior to and during the
enforcement period via safety marine
information broadcasts and the event
will be published in the Local Notice to
Mariners. During the enforcement
periods, entry into those zones by any
vessel is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Boston.
Given the limited time-frame of the
enforcement period of the zone, the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59945
small safety zone size and the short
duration of the blasting events, the
Captain of the Port does not anticipate
any negative impact on vessel traffic
due to this event. Blasting operations
are only to occur during daylight,
specifically between the hours of 6 a.m.
and 4 p.m. The moving safety zone
around the EMILY ROSE will be
enforced only during the loading,
unloading and transit of explosives to
the site and from the site back to shore
with any unused explosives. Portions of
the safety zones around the perimeter of
the blasting work are located within the
channel and may peripherally affect
vessels transiting in or out of the port.
However, the zone around the blasting
worksite will be enforced only during
the actual blasting times thus
minimizing any adverse impact. Public
notifications will be made during the
entire effective period of this safety zone
via marine information broadcasts and
through local notice to mariners.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation is unnecessary. Although
this rule will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of Boston Harbor
during the blasting and dredging
operations, the effect of this rule will
not be significant for several reasons:
vessels, although excluded from the
zone, will have sufficient navigable
water to safely maneuver in all other
waters of Boston Harbor surrounding
the zone when blasting is occurring;
and, when blasting operations are not
occurring the zones will not be enforced
thus allowing vessels to move within
the areas designated by this rule; also,
advance notifications will be made to
the local maritime community by
marine information broadcasts and
Local Notice to Mariners allowing
mariners to plan voyages accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
59946
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of Boston Harbor during the
effective period of this safety zone. For
the reasons outlined in the Regulatory
Evaluation section above, this safety
zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
the Coast Guard wants to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so
that they can better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process. If this rule will
affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance,
please call Chief Eldridge McFadden,
Sector Boston, Waterways Management
Division, at (617) 223–5160.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:55 Oct 22, 2007
Jkt 214001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it establishes a safety zone. A
final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check
List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T01–145 to
read as follows:
I
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 165.T–01–145 Safety Zone: Army Corps
Underwater Rock Demolition, Boston
Harbor, Boston, MA.
(a) Location. The following areas are
safety zones: (1) All navigable waters of
the Fore River and Boston Harbor, from
surface to bottom, within a four
hundred (400) yard radius around the
blasting and dredging sites located in
Boston Harbor at approximate positions:
42°20′05.5″ N, 070°59′53.9″ W, eastsoutheast of Castle Island; 42°20′19.0″
N, 070°58′46.5″ W, President Roads
Anchorage; 42°21′15.80″ N,
070°55′51.95″ W, North Channel; and
42°22′03.70″ N, 070°55′18.83″ W, North
Channel, while blasting operations are
occurring. (2) All navigable waters
within a one hundred (100) yard radius
of the motor vessel EMILY ROSE while
it is loading, transporting and unloading
explosives.
(b) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 12:01 a.m. on October 5,
2007 until 11:59 p.m. on December 31,
2007.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port, Boston Harbor.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR
§ 165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations in section 165.23 of this
part, entry into or movement within this
zone by any person or vessel is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Boston or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(3) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission by calling the Sector Boston
Command Center at 617–223–5761 or
via VHF channel 16. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:55 Oct 22, 2007
Jkt 214001
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced only during daylight
hours where blasting operations are
being conducted and when the vessel
EMILY ROSE is loading, transporting or
unloading explosives.
Dated: October 4, 2007.
Gail P. Kulisch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Boston, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E7–20780 Filed 10–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[OAR–2004–0091; FRL–8479–6]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations; Consistency Update for
California
Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’).
ACTION: Final rule—consistency update.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the updates
of the Outer Continental Shelf (‘‘OCS’’)
Air Regulations proposed in the Federal
Register on March 23, 2006, August 18,
2006 and May 31, 2007. Requirements
applying to OCS sources located within
25 miles of states’ seaward boundaries
must be updated periodically to remain
consistent with the requirements of the
corresponding onshore area (‘‘COA’’), as
mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
(‘‘the Act’’). The portions of the OCS air
regulations that are being updated
pertain to the requirements for OCS
sources for which the Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District is the
designated COA. The intended effect of
approving the requirements contained
in ‘‘Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District Requirements
Applicable to OCS Sources’’ (September
2007) is to regulate emissions from OCS
sources in accordance with the
requirements onshore.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on November 23, 2007.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of November 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number OAR–2004–0091 for this action.
The index to the docket is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some
information may be publicly available
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59947
only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material), and some may
not be publicly available in either
location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Allen, Air Division, U.S. EPA
Region IX, (415) 947–4120,
allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Public Comment
III. EPA Action
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Congressional Review Act
K. Petitions for Judicial Review
I. Background
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, and ‘‘our’’ refer to U.S.
EPA.
On March 23, 2006 (71 FR 14662),
August 18, 2006 (71 FR 47758) and May
31, 2007 (72 FR 30320), EPA proposed
to approve requirements into the OCS
Air Regulations pertaining to Ventura
County APCD. These requirements are
being promulgated in response to the
submittal of rules from this California
air pollution control agency. EPA has
evaluated the proposed requirements to
ensure that they are rationally related to
the attainment or maintenance of federal
or state ambient air quality standards or
Part C of title I of the Act, that they are
not designed expressly to prevent
exploration and development of the
OCS and that they are applicable to OCS
sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also
evaluated the rules to ensure that they
are not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR
55.12(e). In addition, EPA has excluded
administrative or procedural rules.
Section 328(a) of the Act requires that
EPA establish requirements to control
air pollution from OCS sources located
within 25 miles of states’ seaward
boundaries that are the same as onshore
requirements. To comply with this
statutory mandate, EPA must
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59944-59947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20780]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. CGD01-07-145]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone: Army Corps of Engineers Blasting and Dredging
Operation, Boston Harbor, Boston, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing temporary safety zones in
Boston Harbor, Boston, Massachusetts, for the Army Corps of Engineers
(ACOE) blasting and dredging operation, to include the underwater
blasting locations and the vessel transporting blasting material to and
from the work sites, between October 5, 2007 and December 31, 2007. The
zone temporarily closes all navigable waters of Boston Harbor within a
four hundred (400) yard radius of the four underwater demolition sites
located at approximate positions 42[deg]20'05.5'' N, 070[deg]59'53.9''
W, east-southeast of Castle Island; 42[deg]20'19.0'' N,
070[deg]58'46.5'' W, President Roads Anchorage; 42[deg]21'15.80'' N,
070[deg]55'51.95'' W, North Channel; 42[deg]22'03.70'' N,
070[deg]55'18.83'' W, North Channel, while blasting operations are
occurring and a moving
[[Page 59945]]
safety zone of one hundred yards around the M/V EMILY ROSE. The
operations will only occur during daylight hours. The safety zone is
necessary to protect the maritime public from the potential hazards
posed by the blasting and dredging. Entry into this zone is prohibited
during the closure period unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Boston, Massachusetts.
DATES: This rule is effective from 12:01 a.m. on October 5, 2007 until
11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD01-07-145 and are available for
inspection or copying at Sector Boston, 427 Commercial Street, Boston,
MA, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Eldridge McFadden, Sector
Boston, Waterways Management Division, at (617) 223-5160.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. A notice and comment period
was not held for this rulemaking because the logistics with respect to
the blasting and dredging were not determined with sufficient time to
draft and publish an NPRM. Delaying the necessary blasting operations
to accommodate a notice and comment period would be contrary to the
public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register as immediate action is needed to
protect vessels transiting the area from the hazards associated with
underwater blasting and rock removal operations. Any delay encountered
in this regulation's effective date would be contrary to the public
interest since immediate action is necessary to protect persons,
facilities, vessels and others in the maritime community from the
safety hazards associated with the handling, detonation, and
transportation of explosives.
Background and Purpose
The Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a project to deepen
Boston Harbor. Within the shipping channels there are several rock
formations which are impeding the progress of the work. The Army Corps
has contracted RDA Construction to perform the associated blasting and
dredging to remove the rock. The explosives will be transferred to and
from the blasting sites aboard the M/V EMILY ROSE. In order to protect
the maritime public from the hazards associated with the loading,
detonation, and transportation of explosives in and around the blasting
areas, the Coast Guard is establishing safety zones around each of the
four blasting sites and a moving safety zone around the vessel EMILY
ROSE as it transits from the loading point on the Fore River in Quincy,
Massachusetts to the blasting sites and back. Entry into these zones
will be prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port.
Discussion of Rule
This rule establishes temporary safety zones on the navigable
waters of Boston Harbor within a four hundred (400) yard radius of the
various rock sites located in Boston Harbor at approximate positions
42[deg]20'05.5'' N, 070[deg]59'53.9'' W, east-southeast of Castle
Island; 42[deg]20'19.0'' N, 070[deg]58'46.5'' W, President Roads
Anchorage; 42[deg]21'15.80'' N, 070[deg]55'51.95'' W, North Channel;
and, 42[deg]22'03.70'' N, 070[deg]55'18.83'' W, North Channel while
blasting and dredging is occurring. This regulation also establishes a
moving safety zone on all navigable waters of the Fore River and Boston
Harbor in a 100 yard radius around the M/V EMILY ROSE as it loads and
unloads explosives and transits from the Fore River to the four
demolition areas and from the demolition areas back to the Fore River
shipyard. The explosives loading will occur at the Fore River shipyard
wet dock in Quincy, Massachusetts. The explosives will be transported
via vessel to the construction barges at the above noted positions
where the blasting and dredging is occurring.
This rule is effective from 12:01 a.m. EDT on October 5, 2007 until
11:59 p.m. EST on December 31, 2007. Although the safety zone will be
in effect for twelve weeks, it will only be enforced during actual
transit and blasting times. Blasting will only occur during daylight
hours.
Marine traffic may transit safely outside of the zone during the
enforcement period. Public notifications will be made prior to and
during the enforcement period via safety marine information broadcasts
and the event will be published in the Local Notice to Mariners. During
the enforcement periods, entry into those zones by any vessel is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Boston.
Given the limited time-frame of the enforcement period of the zone,
the small safety zone size and the short duration of the blasting
events, the Captain of the Port does not anticipate any negative impact
on vessel traffic due to this event. Blasting operations are only to
occur during daylight, specifically between the hours of 6 a.m. and 4
p.m. The moving safety zone around the EMILY ROSE will be enforced only
during the loading, unloading and transit of explosives to the site and
from the site back to shore with any unused explosives. Portions of the
safety zones around the perimeter of the blasting work are located
within the channel and may peripherally affect vessels transiting in or
out of the port. However, the zone around the blasting worksite will be
enforced only during the actual blasting times thus minimizing any
adverse impact. Public notifications will be made during the entire
effective period of this safety zone via marine information broadcasts
and through local notice to mariners.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this
rule will prevent traffic from transiting a portion of Boston Harbor
during the blasting and dredging operations, the effect of this rule
will not be significant for several reasons: vessels, although excluded
from the zone, will have sufficient navigable water to safely maneuver
in all other waters of Boston Harbor surrounding the zone when blasting
is occurring; and, when blasting operations are not occurring the zones
will not be enforced thus allowing vessels to move within the areas
designated by this rule; also, advance notifications will be made to
the local maritime community by marine information broadcasts and Local
Notice to Mariners allowing mariners to plan voyages accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently
[[Page 59946]]
owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of Boston Harbor during the effective
period of this safety zone. For the reasons outlined in the Regulatory
Evaluation section above, this safety zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), the Coast Guard
wants to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they
can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking process. If this rule will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call Chief
Eldridge McFadden, Sector Boston, Waterways Management Division, at
(617) 223-5160.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it establishes a safety zone. A final ``Environmental
Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' will be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 59947]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T01-145 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T-01-145 Safety Zone: Army Corps Underwater Rock Demolition,
Boston Harbor, Boston, MA.
(a) Location. The following areas are safety zones: (1) All
navigable waters of the Fore River and Boston Harbor, from surface to
bottom, within a four hundred (400) yard radius around the blasting and
dredging sites located in Boston Harbor at approximate positions:
42[deg]20'05.5'' N, 070[deg]59'53.9'' W, east-southeast of Castle
Island; 42[deg]20'19.0'' N, 070[deg]58'46.5'' W, President Roads
Anchorage; 42[deg]21'15.80'' N, 070[deg]55'51.95'' W, North Channel;
and 42[deg]22'03.70'' N, 070[deg]55'18.83'' W, North Channel, while
blasting operations are occurring. (2) All navigable waters within a
one hundred (100) yard radius of the motor vessel EMILY ROSE while it
is loading, transporting and unloading explosives.
(b) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 12:01 a.m. on
October 5, 2007 until 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2007.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port,
Boston Harbor.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
Sec. 165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations in section 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within this zone by any person or
vessel is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP), Boston or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative to
obtain permission by calling the Sector Boston Command Center at 617-
223-5761 or via VHF channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to
enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions
given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced only during
daylight hours where blasting operations are being conducted and when
the vessel EMILY ROSE is loading, transporting or unloading explosives.
Dated: October 4, 2007.
Gail P. Kulisch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Boston, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E7-20780 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P