Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Cabot Corporation Proposed Decommissioning Plan for Site in Reading, PA, 59558-59560 [E7-20746]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
59558
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Notices
Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.
2. Board Briefing: Part 717 of NCUA’s
Rules and Regulations, Interagency
Final Rule and Guidelines on Identity
Theft Red Flags and Address
Discrepancies.
3. Board Briefing: Part 717 of NCUA’s
Rules and Regulations, Interagency
Final Rule on Affiliate Marketing.
4. Final Rule: Section 701.2 of
NCUA’s Rules and Regulations, Federal
Credit Union Bylaws.
RECESS: 11 a.m.
TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Thursday,
October 25, 2007.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. One (1) Merger Application under
Parts 704 and 708b of NCUA’s Rules
and Regulations. Closed pursuant to
Exemption (8).
2. One (1) Insurance Appeal. Closed
pursuant to Exemption (6).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703–518–6304.
PLACE:
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07–5230 Filed 10–18–07; 3:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice of permits issued under
the Antarctic Conservation of 1978,
Public Law 95–541.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permits issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office,
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 7, 2007 and September 13,
2007, the National Science Foundation
published notices in the Federal
Register of permit applications received.
Permits were issued on October 16,
2007 to:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
Juan Lopez-Bautista, Permit No. 2008–
018
Sam Feola, Permit No. 2008–019
William R. Fraser, Permit No. 2008–020
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–20668 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT
CORPORATION
Neighborworks America Regular
Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine
Act
2 p.m., Wednesday,
October 24, 2007.
PLACE: 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800,
Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.
STATUS: Open.
TIME AND DATE:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate
Secretary, (202) 220–2376;
ehall@nw.org.
AGENDA:
I. Call to Order.
II. Approval of the Minutes.
III. Summary Report of the Finance,
Budget and Program Committee.
IV. Summary Report of the Audit
Committee.
V. Summary Report of the Audit
Committee.
VI. Summary Report of the Corporate
Administration Committee.
VII. Financial Report.
VIII. Corporate Scorecard.
IX. Chief Executive Officer’s Quarterly
Management Report.
X. Field Operations Presentation.
Adjournment.
Erica L. Hall
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–5225 Filed 10–18–07; 2:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570–02–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
located in West Feliciana Parish,
Louisiana.
The proposed amendment would
have revised the facility Technical
Specifications and the operating license.
The proposed change would have added
a License Condition 2.C to the Facility
Operating License NPF–47 that allows
River Bend Station, Unit 1, Technical
Specifications surveillance intervals to
be extended on a one-time basis for the
14th Fuel Cycle to account for the
effects of a delayed refueling outage.
The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on October 9, 2007
(72 FR 57354). However, by letter dated
October 3, 2007, the licensee withdrew
the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated September 13, 2007,
and the licensee’s letter dated October 3,
2007, which withdrew the application
for license amendment. Documents may
be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at
the NRC(s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records
will be accessible electronically from
the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons
who do not have access to ADAMS or
who encounter problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR Reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of October 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bhalchandra Vaidya,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–20738 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[Docket No. 50–458]
Entergy Operations, Inc.; Notice of
Withdrawal of Application for
Amendment to Facility Operating
License
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
granted the request of Entergy
Operations, Inc., (the licensee) to
withdraw its September 13, 2007,
application for a proposed amendment
to Facility Operating License No. NPF–
47 for the River Bend Station, Unit 1,
Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Cabot Corporation Proposed
Decommissioning Plan for Site in
Reading, PA
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. 40–9027]
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Notices
Notice of availability and
finding of no significant impact.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a final
Environmental Assessment (EA) for
Cabot Corporation (Cabot or the
licensee) Decommissioning Plan (DP),
dated August 21, 2006, which requested
authorization to commence
decommissioning activities to achieve
unrestricted release of a site in Reading,
Pennsylvania. The final EA makes a
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
for the proposed action, and is being
issued as part of the NRC’s decisionmaking process on whether to issue an
amendment to license SMC–1562,
pursuant to Title 10 of the U.S. Code of
Federal Regulations Part 40, ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Source Material Licenses.’’
The proposed DP specifies installation
of a riprap erosion barrier on the site
slope. The site is owned by the City of
Reading and is located in a large
redevelopment area. Tentative City
plans are for industrial activities in a
new structure to be built on top of the
slope, adjacent to the Cabot site. The
site itself will not be developed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theodore Smith, Project Manager,
Reactor Decommissioning Branch,
Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Mail Stop
T8–F5, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001. Telephone: (301) 415–6721;
e-mail: tbs1@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
I. Introduction
Cabot Corporation (Cabot) holds U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Source Materials License SMC–1562,
allowing the storage of radioactive
materials at Cabot’s Reading,
Pennsylvania, site. Former ore
processing in the 1960s at the facility
generated waste slag contaminated with
uranium and thorium. A smaller
amount of debris from facility
decontamination was added to the site
in the late 1970s. In the 1980s, Cabot
began onsite decommissioning activities
at the main processing building at its
Reading site, and began preparing for
decommissioning activities at Reading
site slag pile by conducting site
characterization, determining slag leach
rate constants, taking surface gamma
measurements, and performing
radiological analysis of surface and
subsurface samples. Contaminated areas
of the main building area were
remediated in a series of cleanup
actions in the early 1990s. Cabot
originally submitted the
decommissioning plan (DP) in 1998 and
has revised it several times to address
various NRC concerns. On August 21,
2006, Cabot submitted Revision 4 of its
proposed DP which proposes
installation of a riprap erosion barrier at
the site. The NRC has prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) in
support of this action in accordance
with the requirements of 10 CFR part
51. Based on the EA, the NRC has
concluded that a Finding of No
Significant Impact is appropriate. If
approved, the license amendment
incorporating the DP would be issued
following publication of this Notice.
II. EA Summary
The Proposed Action
Cabot requested approval of its DP,
which would allow it to conduct
decommissioning activities at the site. If
approved and properly implemented,
the DP would eventually lead to the
termination of its NRC source materials
license. In its DP, Cabot proposed to
place a riprap erosion cover on the slag
pile’s slope and provided analysis to
demonstrate that the site will be
acceptable for license termination under
unrestricted release.
Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of this action is to
decommission an NRC-licensed site,
allowing for its unrestricted use and
termination of the source material
license. This action is required by 10
CFR 40.42, ‘‘Expiration and Termination
of Licenses and Decommissioning of
Sites and Separate Buildings or Outdoor
Areas.’’
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC staff concluded that the
proposed decommissioning activities
will not result in a significant impact to
the environment. No significant impacts
to the site ecology are anticipated
because of the proposed action. The
proposed action will not adversely
affect Federal or State-listed threatened
or endangered species, or regional
historic and cultural resources. The
proposed action can be viewed as a
continuation of impacts and can be
evaluated based on the previous impacts
from past operations. In making this
determination, the staff considered
impacts to such areas as public and
occupational health, transportation,
socioeconomics, ecology, water quality,
and the effects of natural phenomena.
Further details regarding the staff’s
environmental evaluation of the
proposed action are set forth in the EA
(ML072390296)
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The staff completed consultations
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) for consideration under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act and with
the Pennsylvania State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) for
consideration under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act. In
addition the staff provided the draft EA
to the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP)
officials for comment. An addendum to
the final EA sets forth the PADEP
comments and the NRC’s responses, and
provides a history of operations at the
site.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The final EA supports the proposed
action to issue a license amendment
approving Cabot’s DP for the Reading
site. On the basis of this EA, NRC has
concluded that there are no significant
environmental impacts from the
proposed action, and that preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement is
not warranted. Accordingly, it has been
determined that a Finding of No
Significant Impact is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for
amendment and supporting
documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s Agencywide
Document Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The ADAMS accession
numbers for the documents related to
this notice are:
Documents
ADAMS Accession Nos.
Licensee Decommissioning Plan ...........................................................................................................................
PADEP consultation ..............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
59559
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
ML062360159, ML062360164,
ML062640081, ML062210261.
ML070880408, ML072390482.
22OCN1
59560
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Notices
Documents
ADAMS Accession Nos.
SHPO consultation ................................................................................................................................................
FWS consultation ...................................................................................................................................................
Environmental Assessment ...................................................................................................................................
If you do not have access to ADAMS or
if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of October 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew Persinko,
Branch Chief, Reactor Decommissioning
Branch, Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E7–20746 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–382]
Entergy Operations, Inc.; Waterford
Steam Electric Station, Unit 3
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of exemptions from Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) Part 50, Section 50.46 and
Appendix K, for Facility Operating
License No. NPF–38, issued to Entergy
Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee),
for operation of the Waterford Steam
Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3),
located in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21,
the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant
impact.
Environmental Assessment
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
the licensee from the requirements of 10
CFR part 50, section 50.46 and
Appendix K to allow the use of
Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding
as the allowable fuel rod cladding
material. The proposed action is in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
accordance with Entergy’s application
dated April 24, 2007.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The NRC’s regulations in 10 CFR part
50, section 50.46 and Appendix K, make
no provision for use of fuel rod clad in
a material other than Zircaloy or
ZIRLOTM. Optimized ZIRLOTM has a
lower tin content than either Zircaloy or
ZIRLOTM; therefore, use of Optimized
ZIRLOTM fuel rod clad calls for an
exemption from 10 CFR part 50, section
50.46 and Appendix K.
For cladding with a lower tin content,
corrosive resistance has been found to
improve, as indicated by available
industry data from the American
Nuclear Society, the International
Atomic Energy Agency, the Electric
Power Research Institute, and
Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The
optimum tin level provides a reduced
corrosion rate while maintaining the
benefits of mechanical strength and
resistance to accelerated corrosion from
abnormal chemistry conditions. In
addition, fuel rod internal pressures
(resulting from increased fuel duty, use
of integral fuel burnable absorbers and
corrosion/temperature feedback effects)
have become more limiting with respect
to fuel rod design criteria. Reducing the
associated corrosion buildup, and thus,
minimizing temperature feedback
effects, provides additional margin to
fuel rod internal pressure design
criteria. The NRC previously granted a
similar exemption in July 2004 for
Waterford 3 for use of Optimized
ZIRLOTM in four lead-test assemblies.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC staff has completed its safety
evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that the proposed exemptions
would continue to satisfy the
underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50,
sections 50.46 and Appendix K, and
will not increase the probability or
consequences of accidents previously
analyzed and would not affect facility
radiation levels or facility radiological
effluents.
The details of the staff’s safety
evaluation will be provided in the
exemption that will be issued as part of
the letter to the licensee approving the
amendment to the regulation.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ML070430115, ML071240260,
ML071450487, ML072220371.
ML06026123 , ML060730519.
ML072390323, ML072390296.
The proposed action will not
significantly increase the probability or
consequences of accidents. No changes
are being made in the types of effluents
that may be released off site. There is no
significant increase in the amount of
any effluent released off site. There is no
significant increase in occupational or
public radiation exposure. Therefore,
there are no significant radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect
any historic sites. It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no
other environmental impact. Therefore,
there are no significant non-radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
there are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). Denial of the application
would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative
are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of
any different resources than those
previously considered in the Final
Environmental Statement for Waterford
3, dated September 1981.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy,
on August 17, 2007, the staff consulted
with the Louisiana State official, Ms.
Nan Calhoun of the Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality,
regarding the environmental impact of
the proposed action. The State official
had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59558-59560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20746]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 40-9027]
Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact for Cabot Corporation Proposed
Decommissioning Plan for Site in Reading, PA
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[[Page 59559]]
ACTION: Notice of availability and finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a final Environmental Assessment (EA) for
Cabot Corporation (Cabot or the licensee) Decommissioning Plan (DP),
dated August 21, 2006, which requested authorization to commence
decommissioning activities to achieve unrestricted release of a site in
Reading, Pennsylvania. The final EA makes a finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) for the proposed action, and is being issued as part of
the NRC's decision-making process on whether to issue an amendment to
license SMC-1562, pursuant to Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal
Regulations Part 40, ``Domestic Licensing of Source Material
Licenses.'' The proposed DP specifies installation of a riprap erosion
barrier on the site slope. The site is owned by the City of Reading and
is located in a large redevelopment area. Tentative City plans are for
industrial activities in a new structure to be built on top of the
slope, adjacent to the Cabot site. The site itself will not be
developed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore Smith, Project Manager,
Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Mail Stop T8-F5, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-6721; e-
mail: tbs1@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Cabot Corporation (Cabot) holds U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) Source Materials License SMC-1562, allowing the storage of
radioactive materials at Cabot's Reading, Pennsylvania, site. Former
ore processing in the 1960s at the facility generated waste slag
contaminated with uranium and thorium. A smaller amount of debris from
facility decontamination was added to the site in the late 1970s. In
the 1980s, Cabot began onsite decommissioning activities at the main
processing building at its Reading site, and began preparing for
decommissioning activities at Reading site slag pile by conducting site
characterization, determining slag leach rate constants, taking surface
gamma measurements, and performing radiological analysis of surface and
subsurface samples. Contaminated areas of the main building area were
remediated in a series of cleanup actions in the early 1990s. Cabot
originally submitted the decommissioning plan (DP) in 1998 and has
revised it several times to address various NRC concerns. On August 21,
2006, Cabot submitted Revision 4 of its proposed DP which proposes
installation of a riprap erosion barrier at the site. The NRC has
prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in support of this action in
accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 51. Based on the EA,
the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact is
appropriate. If approved, the license amendment incorporating the DP
would be issued following publication of this Notice.
II. EA Summary
The Proposed Action
Cabot requested approval of its DP, which would allow it to conduct
decommissioning activities at the site. If approved and properly
implemented, the DP would eventually lead to the termination of its NRC
source materials license. In its DP, Cabot proposed to place a riprap
erosion cover on the slag pile's slope and provided analysis to
demonstrate that the site will be acceptable for license termination
under unrestricted release.
Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of this action is to decommission an NRC-licensed site,
allowing for its unrestricted use and termination of the source
material license. This action is required by 10 CFR 40.42, ``Expiration
and Termination of Licenses and Decommissioning of Sites and Separate
Buildings or Outdoor Areas.''
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC staff concluded that the proposed decommissioning
activities will not result in a significant impact to the environment.
No significant impacts to the site ecology are anticipated because of
the proposed action. The proposed action will not adversely affect
Federal or State-listed threatened or endangered species, or regional
historic and cultural resources. The proposed action can be viewed as a
continuation of impacts and can be evaluated based on the previous
impacts from past operations. In making this determination, the staff
considered impacts to such areas as public and occupational health,
transportation, socioeconomics, ecology, water quality, and the effects
of natural phenomena. Further details regarding the staff's
environmental evaluation of the proposed action are set forth in the EA
(ML072390296)
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The staff completed consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) for consideration under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act and with the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) for consideration under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act. In addition the staff provided the draft EA
to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP)
officials for comment. An addendum to the final EA sets forth the PADEP
comments and the NRC's responses, and provides a history of operations
at the site.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The final EA supports the proposed action to issue a license
amendment approving Cabot's DP for the Reading site. On the basis of
this EA, NRC has concluded that there are no significant environmental
impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement is not warranted. Accordingly, it has
been determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action, including the application for
amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at
the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide
Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and
image files of NRC's public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for
the documents related to this notice are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Documents ADAMS Accession Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Licensee Decommissioning Plan ML062360159, ML062360164,
ML062640081, ML062210261.
PADEP consultation........... ML070880408, ML072390482.
[[Page 59560]]
SHPO consultation............ ML070430115, ML071240260,
ML071450487, ML072220371.
FWS consultation............. ML06026123 , ML060730519.
Environmental Assessment..... ML072390323, ML072390296.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public
computers located at the NRC's PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction
contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of October 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew Persinko,
Branch Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste
Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-20746 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
