Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Cabot Corporation Proposed Decommissioning Plan for Site in Reading, PA, 59558-59560 [E7-20746]

Download as PDF 59558 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Notices Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3428. STATUS: Open. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report. 2. Board Briefing: Part 717 of NCUA’s Rules and Regulations, Interagency Final Rule and Guidelines on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies. 3. Board Briefing: Part 717 of NCUA’s Rules and Regulations, Interagency Final Rule on Affiliate Marketing. 4. Final Rule: Section 701.2 of NCUA’s Rules and Regulations, Federal Credit Union Bylaws. RECESS: 11 a.m. TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Thursday, October 25, 2007. PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3428. STATUS: Closed. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. One (1) Merger Application under Parts 704 and 708b of NCUA’s Rules and Regulations. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8). 2. One (1) Insurance Appeal. Closed pursuant to Exemption (6). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703–518–6304. PLACE: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 07–5230 Filed 10–18–07; 3:18 pm] BILLING CODE 7535–01–M NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 National Science Foundation. ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95–541. ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 7, 2007 and September 13, 2007, the National Science Foundation published notices in the Federal Register of permit applications received. Permits were issued on October 16, 2007 to: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:02 Oct 19, 2007 Jkt 214001 Juan Lopez-Bautista, Permit No. 2008– 018 Sam Feola, Permit No. 2008–019 William R. Fraser, Permit No. 2008–020 Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Officer. [FR Doc. E7–20668 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION Neighborworks America Regular Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act 2 p.m., Wednesday, October 24, 2007. PLACE: 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005. STATUS: Open. TIME AND DATE: CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220–2376; ehall@nw.org. AGENDA: I. Call to Order. II. Approval of the Minutes. III. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee. IV. Summary Report of the Audit Committee. V. Summary Report of the Audit Committee. VI. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee. VII. Financial Report. VIII. Corporate Scorecard. IX. Chief Executive Officer’s Quarterly Management Report. X. Field Operations Presentation. Adjournment. Erica L. Hall Assistant Corporate Secretary. [FR Doc. 07–5225 Filed 10–18–07; 2:12 pm] BILLING CODE 7570–02–M NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION located in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana. The proposed amendment would have revised the facility Technical Specifications and the operating license. The proposed change would have added a License Condition 2.C to the Facility Operating License NPF–47 that allows River Bend Station, Unit 1, Technical Specifications surveillance intervals to be extended on a one-time basis for the 14th Fuel Cycle to account for the effects of a delayed refueling outage. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57354). However, by letter dated October 3, 2007, the licensee withdrew the proposed change. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated September 13, 2007, and the licensee’s letter dated October 3, 2007, which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC(s Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the internet at the NRC Web site, http:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of October 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Bhalchandra Vaidya, Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. E7–20738 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P [Docket No. 50–458] Entergy Operations, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Entergy Operations, Inc., (the licensee) to withdraw its September 13, 2007, application for a proposed amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF– 47 for the River Bend Station, Unit 1, Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Cabot Corporation Proposed Decommissioning Plan for Site in Reading, PA PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Docket No. 40–9027] Nuclear Regulatory Commission. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Notices Notice of availability and finding of no significant impact. ACTION: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a final Environmental Assessment (EA) for Cabot Corporation (Cabot or the licensee) Decommissioning Plan (DP), dated August 21, 2006, which requested authorization to commence decommissioning activities to achieve unrestricted release of a site in Reading, Pennsylvania. The final EA makes a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the proposed action, and is being issued as part of the NRC’s decisionmaking process on whether to issue an amendment to license SMC–1562, pursuant to Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 40, ‘‘Domestic Licensing of Source Material Licenses.’’ The proposed DP specifies installation of a riprap erosion barrier on the site slope. The site is owned by the City of Reading and is located in a large redevelopment area. Tentative City plans are for industrial activities in a new structure to be built on top of the slope, adjacent to the Cabot site. The site itself will not be developed. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore Smith, Project Manager, Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Mail Stop T8–F5, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001. Telephone: (301) 415–6721; e-mail: tbs1@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES I. Introduction Cabot Corporation (Cabot) holds U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Source Materials License SMC–1562, allowing the storage of radioactive materials at Cabot’s Reading, Pennsylvania, site. Former ore processing in the 1960s at the facility generated waste slag contaminated with uranium and thorium. A smaller amount of debris from facility decontamination was added to the site in the late 1970s. In the 1980s, Cabot began onsite decommissioning activities at the main processing building at its Reading site, and began preparing for decommissioning activities at Reading site slag pile by conducting site characterization, determining slag leach rate constants, taking surface gamma measurements, and performing radiological analysis of surface and subsurface samples. Contaminated areas of the main building area were remediated in a series of cleanup actions in the early 1990s. Cabot originally submitted the decommissioning plan (DP) in 1998 and has revised it several times to address various NRC concerns. On August 21, 2006, Cabot submitted Revision 4 of its proposed DP which proposes installation of a riprap erosion barrier at the site. The NRC has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in support of this action in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 51. Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. If approved, the license amendment incorporating the DP would be issued following publication of this Notice. II. EA Summary The Proposed Action Cabot requested approval of its DP, which would allow it to conduct decommissioning activities at the site. If approved and properly implemented, the DP would eventually lead to the termination of its NRC source materials license. In its DP, Cabot proposed to place a riprap erosion cover on the slag pile’s slope and provided analysis to demonstrate that the site will be acceptable for license termination under unrestricted release. Need for the Proposed Action The purpose of this action is to decommission an NRC-licensed site, allowing for its unrestricted use and termination of the source material license. This action is required by 10 CFR 40.42, ‘‘Expiration and Termination of Licenses and Decommissioning of Sites and Separate Buildings or Outdoor Areas.’’ Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff concluded that the proposed decommissioning activities will not result in a significant impact to the environment. No significant impacts to the site ecology are anticipated because of the proposed action. The proposed action will not adversely affect Federal or State-listed threatened or endangered species, or regional historic and cultural resources. The proposed action can be viewed as a continuation of impacts and can be evaluated based on the previous impacts from past operations. In making this determination, the staff considered impacts to such areas as public and occupational health, transportation, socioeconomics, ecology, water quality, and the effects of natural phenomena. Further details regarding the staff’s environmental evaluation of the proposed action are set forth in the EA (ML072390296) Agencies and Persons Consulted The staff completed consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for consideration under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and with the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for consideration under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. In addition the staff provided the draft EA to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) officials for comment. An addendum to the final EA sets forth the PADEP comments and the NRC’s responses, and provides a history of operations at the site. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The final EA supports the proposed action to issue a license amendment approving Cabot’s DP for the Reading site. On the basis of this EA, NRC has concluded that there are no significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not warranted. Accordingly, it has been determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. IV. Further Information Documents related to this action, including the application for amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC’s Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC’s public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for the documents related to this notice are: Documents ADAMS Accession Nos. Licensee Decommissioning Plan ........................................................................................................................... PADEP consultation .............................................................................................................................................. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:02 Oct 19, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 59559 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM ML062360159, ML062360164, ML062640081, ML062210261. ML070880408, ML072390482. 22OCN1 59560 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Notices Documents ADAMS Accession Nos. SHPO consultation ................................................................................................................................................ FWS consultation ................................................................................................................................................... Environmental Assessment ................................................................................................................................... If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301– 415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of October 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Andrew Persinko, Branch Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. [FR Doc. E7–20746 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50–382] Entergy Operations, Inc.; Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of exemptions from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 50.46 and Appendix K, for Facility Operating License No. NPF–38, issued to Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee), for operation of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3), located in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. Environmental Assessment ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action would exempt the licensee from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50, section 50.46 and Appendix K to allow the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding as the allowable fuel rod cladding material. The proposed action is in VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:02 Oct 19, 2007 Jkt 214001 accordance with Entergy’s application dated April 24, 2007. The Need for the Proposed Action The NRC’s regulations in 10 CFR part 50, section 50.46 and Appendix K, make no provision for use of fuel rod clad in a material other than Zircaloy or ZIRLOTM. Optimized ZIRLOTM has a lower tin content than either Zircaloy or ZIRLOTM; therefore, use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod clad calls for an exemption from 10 CFR part 50, section 50.46 and Appendix K. For cladding with a lower tin content, corrosive resistance has been found to improve, as indicated by available industry data from the American Nuclear Society, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Electric Power Research Institute, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The optimum tin level provides a reduced corrosion rate while maintaining the benefits of mechanical strength and resistance to accelerated corrosion from abnormal chemistry conditions. In addition, fuel rod internal pressures (resulting from increased fuel duty, use of integral fuel burnable absorbers and corrosion/temperature feedback effects) have become more limiting with respect to fuel rod design criteria. Reducing the associated corrosion buildup, and thus, minimizing temperature feedback effects, provides additional margin to fuel rod internal pressure design criteria. The NRC previously granted a similar exemption in July 2004 for Waterford 3 for use of Optimized ZIRLOTM in four lead-test assemblies. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff has completed its safety evaluation of the proposed action and concludes that the proposed exemptions would continue to satisfy the underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50, sections 50.46 and Appendix K, and will not increase the probability or consequences of accidents previously analyzed and would not affect facility radiation levels or facility radiological effluents. The details of the staff’s safety evaluation will be provided in the exemption that will be issued as part of the letter to the licensee approving the amendment to the regulation. PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ML070430115, ML071240260, ML071450487, ML072220371. ML06026123 , ML060730519. ML072390323, ML072390296. The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents. No changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released off site. There is no significant increase in the amount of any effluent released off site. There is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed action does not have a potential to affect any historic sites. It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative). Denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative are similar. Alternative Use of Resources The action does not involve the use of any different resources than those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for Waterford 3, dated September 1981. Agencies and Persons Consulted In accordance with its stated policy, on August 17, 2007, the staff consulted with the Louisiana State official, Ms. Nan Calhoun of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments. Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59558-59560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-9027]


Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and 
Finding of No Significant Impact for Cabot Corporation Proposed 
Decommissioning Plan for Site in Reading, PA

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

[[Page 59559]]


ACTION: Notice of availability and finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (NRC) is issuing a final Environmental Assessment (EA) for 
Cabot Corporation (Cabot or the licensee) Decommissioning Plan (DP), 
dated August 21, 2006, which requested authorization to commence 
decommissioning activities to achieve unrestricted release of a site in 
Reading, Pennsylvania. The final EA makes a finding of no significant 
impact (FONSI) for the proposed action, and is being issued as part of 
the NRC's decision-making process on whether to issue an amendment to 
license SMC-1562, pursuant to Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal 
Regulations Part 40, ``Domestic Licensing of Source Material 
Licenses.'' The proposed DP specifies installation of a riprap erosion 
barrier on the site slope. The site is owned by the City of Reading and 
is located in a large redevelopment area. Tentative City plans are for 
industrial activities in a new structure to be built on top of the 
slope, adjacent to the Cabot site. The site itself will not be 
developed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore Smith, Project Manager, 
Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management and 
Environmental Protection, Mail Stop T8-F5, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-6721; e-
mail: tbs1@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction

    Cabot Corporation (Cabot) holds U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(NRC) Source Materials License SMC-1562, allowing the storage of 
radioactive materials at Cabot's Reading, Pennsylvania, site. Former 
ore processing in the 1960s at the facility generated waste slag 
contaminated with uranium and thorium. A smaller amount of debris from 
facility decontamination was added to the site in the late 1970s. In 
the 1980s, Cabot began onsite decommissioning activities at the main 
processing building at its Reading site, and began preparing for 
decommissioning activities at Reading site slag pile by conducting site 
characterization, determining slag leach rate constants, taking surface 
gamma measurements, and performing radiological analysis of surface and 
subsurface samples. Contaminated areas of the main building area were 
remediated in a series of cleanup actions in the early 1990s. Cabot 
originally submitted the decommissioning plan (DP) in 1998 and has 
revised it several times to address various NRC concerns. On August 21, 
2006, Cabot submitted Revision 4 of its proposed DP which proposes 
installation of a riprap erosion barrier at the site. The NRC has 
prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in support of this action in 
accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 51. Based on the EA, 
the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact is 
appropriate. If approved, the license amendment incorporating the DP 
would be issued following publication of this Notice.

II. EA Summary

The Proposed Action

    Cabot requested approval of its DP, which would allow it to conduct 
decommissioning activities at the site. If approved and properly 
implemented, the DP would eventually lead to the termination of its NRC 
source materials license. In its DP, Cabot proposed to place a riprap 
erosion cover on the slag pile's slope and provided analysis to 
demonstrate that the site will be acceptable for license termination 
under unrestricted release.

Need for the Proposed Action

    The purpose of this action is to decommission an NRC-licensed site, 
allowing for its unrestricted use and termination of the source 
material license. This action is required by 10 CFR 40.42, ``Expiration 
and Termination of Licenses and Decommissioning of Sites and Separate 
Buildings or Outdoor Areas.''

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC staff concluded that the proposed decommissioning 
activities will not result in a significant impact to the environment. 
No significant impacts to the site ecology are anticipated because of 
the proposed action. The proposed action will not adversely affect 
Federal or State-listed threatened or endangered species, or regional 
historic and cultural resources. The proposed action can be viewed as a 
continuation of impacts and can be evaluated based on the previous 
impacts from past operations. In making this determination, the staff 
considered impacts to such areas as public and occupational health, 
transportation, socioeconomics, ecology, water quality, and the effects 
of natural phenomena. Further details regarding the staff's 
environmental evaluation of the proposed action are set forth in the EA 
(ML072390296)

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    The staff completed consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service (FWS) for consideration under Section 7 of the Endangered 
Species Act and with the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation 
Office (SHPO) for consideration under Section 106 of the National 
Historic Preservation Act. In addition the staff provided the draft EA 
to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) 
officials for comment. An addendum to the final EA sets forth the PADEP 
comments and the NRC's responses, and provides a history of operations 
at the site.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    The final EA supports the proposed action to issue a license 
amendment approving Cabot's DP for the Reading site. On the basis of 
this EA, NRC has concluded that there are no significant environmental 
impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of an 
Environmental Impact Statement is not warranted. Accordingly, it has 
been determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate.

IV. Further Information

    Documents related to this action, including the application for 
amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at 
the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide 
Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and 
image files of NRC's public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for 
the documents related to this notice are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Documents                       ADAMS Accession Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Licensee Decommissioning Plan  ML062360159, ML062360164,
                               ML062640081, ML062210261.
PADEP consultation...........  ML070880408, ML072390482.

[[Page 59560]]

 
SHPO consultation............  ML070430115, ML071240260,
                               ML071450487, ML072220371.
FWS consultation.............  ML06026123 , ML060730519.
Environmental Assessment.....  ML072390323, ML072390296.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in 
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's Public 
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or 
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
    These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public 
computers located at the NRC's PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North, 
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction 
contractor will copy documents for a fee.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of October 2007.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew Persinko,
Branch Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste 
Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State 
Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-20746 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P