Utah Regulatory Program, 59489-59491 [E7-20697]
Download as PDF
59489
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 203
Monday, October 22, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 944
[SATS No. UT–044–FOR; State Amendment
Identification Number UT–1196]
Utah Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Utah
regulatory program (hereinafter, the
Utah program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Utah
proposes revisions to and additions of
rules and statutes about waiving specific
application requirements with a written
determination by the Division of Oil,
Gas and Mining (DOGM), clarification
that applications shall be filed with the
county clerk ‘‘for public inspection,’’
and allowing the area covered by a
permit to be extended by an application
for a significant permit revision.
Utah intends to revise its program to
be consistent with the corresponding
Federal regulations and SMCRA, clarify
ambiguities, and to improve operational
efficiency.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Utah program and
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., m.s.t., November 21, 2007. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on November 16,
2007. We will accept requests to speak
until 4 p.m., m.s.t., on November 6,
2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘UT–044–FOR’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. OSM is listed as
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, P.O. Box
46667, Denver, CO 80201–6667.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: James F.
Fulton, Chief, Denver Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 1999 Broadway, suite
3320, Denver, CO 80202–5733.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and UT–
044–FOR. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: Access to the docket, to
review copies of the Utah program, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled
public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this
document, may be obtained at the
addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM’s)
Denver Field Division. In addition, you
may review a copy of the amendment
during regular business hours at the
following locations:
James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1999
Broadway, suite 3320, Denver, CO
80202–5733, Telephone: (303) 844–
1400, extension 1424, E-mail:
jfulton@osmre.gov.
John R. Baza, Director, Division of Oil,
Gas and Mining, 1594 West North
Temple, suite 1210, Salt Lake City,
UT 84114–5801, Telephone: (801)
538–5340, Internet: https://
www.ogm.utah.gov.
Or anytime at: https://
www.regulations.gov. OSM is listed as
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James F. Fulton, Telephone: (303) 844–
1400 extension 1424. Internet:
jfulton@osmre.gov.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Utah Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Utah Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Utah
program on January 21, 1981. You can
find background information on the
Utah program, including the Secretary’s
findings, the disposition of comments,
and the conditions of approval of the
Utah program in the January 21, 1981,
Federal Register (46 FR 5899). You can
also find later actions concerning Utah’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 944.15 and 944.30.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated August 31, 2007, Utah
sent us a proposed amendment to its
program (SATS No. UT–044–FOR,
administrative record number UT–1196)
under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.).
Utah sent the amendment to propose
changes made at its own initiative. The
full text of the program amendment is
available for you to read at the locations
listed above under ADDRESSES.
Specifically, Utah proposes to amend
Utah Code Annotated (UCA) § 40–10–
10(2)(d)(ii) to clarify the specific permit
application requirements which may be
waived by the Division with a written
determination that the requirements are
unnecessary. Without this proposed
specification, the provision could be
interpreted as allowing the Division to
waive a broader range of requirements.
The proposed amendment to UCA
§ 40–10–10(5) reinstates a provision that
was inadvertently deleted in S.B. 72 in
2002. The proposed addition clarifies
that permit applications are to be filed
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
59490
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Proposed Rules
with the county clerk ‘‘for public
inspection.’’
The above proposed revisions to UCA
§ 40–10–10(2)(d)(ii) and UCA § 40–10–
10(5) address topics that were originally
addressed in SATS No. UT–042–FOR
(administrative record number UT–
1171) and included in the February 21,
2003, concern letter (administrative
record number UT–1180) from OSM to
DOGM.
Proposed changes to UCA § 40–10–
12(1)(c) add a provision allowing
extensions to area covered by a permit
to be made through significant permit
revisions. Additional changes recodify
the provision and do not change the
meaning of the existing statute.
The proposed change to
Administrative Rule R645–303–222
implements the proposed changes to
UCA § 40–10–12(1)(c) and reflects the
procedural requirements referenced for
permit revisions rather than the
previous reference to new permit
application requirements. The above
proposed amendment to R645–303–222
was originally proposed in UT–043–
FOR (admin record number UT–1181).
OSM raised concerns regarding a
conflict with the Utah statute (UCA)
§ 40–10–12(1)(c) in a phone
conversation on January 23, 2006,
documented as administrative record
number UT–1190. Utah formally
withdrew the proposed amendment to
R645–303–222 on February 16, 2006
(admin record number UT–1194)
pending their submittal of a proposed
change to UCA § 40–10–12(1)(c).
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Utah program.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to us at the addresses given
above. Your written comments should
be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We will not consider
or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
record for this rulemaking, but
comments delivered to an address other
than the those listed above may not be
logged in.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., m.s.t. on November 6, 2007. If you
are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The rule does not involve or affect
Indian Tribes in any way.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S. based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal which is the
subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded Mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 944
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: September 12, 2007.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. E7–20697 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am]
59491
the anchorage area. These changes
would ensure all vessels have fair access
to the anchorage area, and provide a
higher degree of vessel and
environmental safety by reducing the
possibility of vessels grounding in
sensitive coral reef areas.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Coast Guard
Sector Miami, Waterways Management
Division, 100 MacArthur Causeway,
Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. Coast
Guard Sector Miami, Waterways
Management Division maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard
Sector Miami, Waterways Management
Division between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Chris Svencer,
Coast Guard Sector Miami, Waterways
Management Division at (305) 535–
4550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
AGENCY:
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [CGD07–122], indicate
the specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and give
the reason for each comment. Please
submit all comments and related
material in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying. If you would like to know they
reached us, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
We may change this proposed rule in
view of them.
ACTION:
Public Meeting
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. CGD07–122]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Regulation; Port
Everglades, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
amend the anchorage regulations for
Port Everglades, Florida. The
amendment would modify the current
anchorage area by eliminating that
portion of the anchorage closest to
sensitive coral reef areas, expand that
portion of the anchorage area that poses
less risk to these areas, and limit the
amount of time a vessel may remain in
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard
Sector Miami, Waterways Management
Division at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would
be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59489-59491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20697]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 59489]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 944
[SATS No. UT-044-FOR; State Amendment Identification Number UT-1196]
Utah Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Utah
regulatory program (hereinafter, the Utah program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Utah
proposes revisions to and additions of rules and statutes about waiving
specific application requirements with a written determination by the
Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (DOGM), clarification that applications
shall be filed with the county clerk ``for public inspection,'' and
allowing the area covered by a permit to be extended by an application
for a significant permit revision.
Utah intends to revise its program to be consistent with the
corresponding Federal regulations and SMCRA, clarify ambiguities, and
to improve operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and locations that the Utah program
and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
m.s.t., November 21, 2007. If requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on November 16, 2007. We will accept requests to speak
until 4 p.m., m.s.t., on November 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``UT-044-FOR'' by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
OSM is listed as Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, P.O. Box 46667,
Denver, CO 80201-6667.
Hand Delivery/Courier: James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1999 Broadway, suite 3320, Denver, CO 80202-5733.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and UT-044-FOR. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Comment Procedures'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: Access to the docket, to review copies of the Utah program,
this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all
written comments received in response to this document, may be obtained
at the addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of
the amendment by contacting Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement (OSM's) Denver Field Division. In addition, you may review
a copy of the amendment during regular business hours at the following
locations:
James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver Field Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1999 Broadway, suite 3320, Denver, CO
80202-5733, Telephone: (303) 844-1400, extension 1424, E-mail:
jfulton@osmre.gov.
John R. Baza, Director, Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, 1594 West
North Temple, suite 1210, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5801, Telephone:
(801) 538-5340, Internet: https://www.ogm.utah.gov.
Or anytime at: https://www.regulations.gov. OSM is listed as Office
of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James F. Fulton, Telephone: (303) 844-
1400 extension 1424. Internet: jfulton@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Utah Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Utah Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Utah program on January 21, 1981. You can
find background information on the Utah program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and the conditions
of approval of the Utah program in the January 21, 1981, Federal
Register (46 FR 5899). You can also find later actions concerning
Utah's program and program amendments at 30 CFR 944.15 and 944.30.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated August 31, 2007, Utah sent us a proposed amendment
to its program (SATS No. UT-044-FOR, administrative record number UT-
1196) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Utah sent the amendment to
propose changes made at its own initiative. The full text of the
program amendment is available for you to read at the locations listed
above under ADDRESSES.
Specifically, Utah proposes to amend Utah Code Annotated (UCA)
Sec. 40-10-10(2)(d)(ii) to clarify the specific permit application
requirements which may be waived by the Division with a written
determination that the requirements are unnecessary. Without this
proposed specification, the provision could be interpreted as allowing
the Division to waive a broader range of requirements.
The proposed amendment to UCA Sec. 40-10-10(5) reinstates a
provision that was inadvertently deleted in S.B. 72 in 2002. The
proposed addition clarifies that permit applications are to be filed
[[Page 59490]]
with the county clerk ``for public inspection.''
The above proposed revisions to UCA Sec. 40-10-10(2)(d)(ii) and
UCA Sec. 40-10-10(5) address topics that were originally addressed in
SATS No. UT-042-FOR (administrative record number UT-1171) and included
in the February 21, 2003, concern letter (administrative record number
UT-1180) from OSM to DOGM.
Proposed changes to UCA Sec. 40-10-12(1)(c) add a provision
allowing extensions to area covered by a permit to be made through
significant permit revisions. Additional changes recodify the provision
and do not change the meaning of the existing statute.
The proposed change to Administrative Rule R645-303-222 implements
the proposed changes to UCA Sec. 40-10-12(1)(c) and reflects the
procedural requirements referenced for permit revisions rather than the
previous reference to new permit application requirements. The above
proposed amendment to R645-303-222 was originally proposed in UT-043-
FOR (admin record number UT-1181). OSM raised concerns regarding a
conflict with the Utah statute (UCA) Sec. 40-10-12(1)(c) in a phone
conversation on January 23, 2006, documented as administrative record
number UT-1190. Utah formally withdrew the proposed amendment to R645-
303-222 on February 16, 2006 (admin record number UT-1194) pending
their submittal of a proposed change to UCA Sec. 40-10-12(1)(c).
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Utah program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to us at the addresses
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We will not consider or respond to
your comments when developing the final rule if they are received after
the close of the comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt
to log all comments into the record for this rulemaking, but comments
delivered to an address other than the those listed above may not be
logged in.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., m.s.t. on
November 6, 2007. If you are disabled and need special accommodations
to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian Tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian Tribes.
[[Page 59491]]
The rule does not involve or affect Indian Tribes in any way.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal which is
the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal regulations
for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made that the
Federal regulation was not considered a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded Mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 944
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: September 12, 2007.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. E7-20697 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P