Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Indiana: Clean Air Interstate Rule, 59506-59507 [E7-20250]
Download as PDF
59506
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Proposed Rules
conserve the species or resources used.
Any decision restricting tribal offreservation treaty rights needs to be well
documented. Consultation with the
affected Tribe(s) and local Office of
General Counsel on how to exercise
such regulatory authority is found in
FSM 1563.1 and FSH 1509.13, Chapter
10.
§ 223.241 Disposal of seized special forest
products.
The Forest Service may dispose of
seized special forest products that have
been illegally obtained from National
Forest System lands. Any commercial
sale of such products shall be conducted
in accordance with the requirements of
this subpart; however, such products
shall not be sold to the entity that
collected them illegally. The Regional
Forester may make seized products
available for free use to individuals,
Indian Tribes with reserved treaty
gathering rights, and other federally
recognized tribes. However, the Forest
Service shall not dispose of a seized
product by sale or free use if that
product is threatened, endangered, or a
candidate for listing under the
Endangered Species Act; identified as
prohibited for sale or trade under
CITES, or listed on the Regional
Forester’s sensitive plant list, list of
species of concern, or list of species of
interest.
Subpart H—Forest Botanical Products
§ 223.275
program.
Establishment of a pilot
This subpart governs the Forest
Service’s pilot program for the disposal
of forest botanical products, as
authorized by the Department of the
Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act of 2000, (Pub. L.
106–113, Div. B, sec. 1000(a)(3), 113
Stat. 135 (enacting into law sec. 339 of
Title III of H.R. 3423)), as amended in
2004 by Section 335 of Public Law 108–
108. The pilot program shall be in effect
through September 30, 2009.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
§ 223.276
Applicability.
This subpart applies to the disposal of
forest botanical products, as defined
herein, from National Forest System
lands, until September 30, 2009 of the
pilot program. The Forest Service shall
dispose forest botanical products in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in 36 CFR part 223 subpart G,
subject to the requirements of this
subpart.
§ 223.277
As used in this subpart, the following
term shall mean:
14:32 Oct 19, 2007
§ 223.278
Collection of fees.
The responsible official shall ensure
that the price applicable to the harvest
and sale of any forest botanical product,
as determined in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 36 CFR part 223
subpart G, includes at least a portion of
the fair market value of the product and
a portion of the costs associated with
administering the pilot program.
§ 223.279 Personal use harvest levels and
waiver of fees.
(a) In conjunction with determining
sustainable harvest levels for special
forest products, including forest
botanical products, pursuant to
§ 223.219 of subpart G, the responsible
Forest Service officer shall also
determine personal use harvest levels,
which shall be consistent with
sustainable harvest levels.
(b) A person may harvest a forest
botanical product from National Forest
system lands, without charge, up to but
not exceeding the personal use harvest
level established for the product. A
person seeking such personal use of a
forest botanical product must comply
with the procedures set forth in
§ 223.239 of subpart G.
(c) Under the following
circumstances, the Forest Service
waives the collection of fees otherwise
required pursuant to § 223.278 of this
subpart:
(1) For federally recognized Indian
tribes seeking to harvest forest botanical
products for cultural, ceremonial, and/
or traditional purposes. Such purposes
must be non-commercial, and any such
harvest may be conditioned or denied as
provided in § 223.240 of subpart G; and,
(2) On any occasion when a Regional
Forester or Forest Supervisor, having
proper authorization from the Chief,
makes a determination in writing that
the harvest facilitates scientific research
or is for salvage because other
management activities will destroy or
damage the product.
§ 223.280 Monitoring and revising of
harvest levels.
Definitions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Forest botanical products—naturally
occurring special forest products,
including bark, berries, boughs,
bryophytes, bulbs, burls, cones, ferns,
fungi (including mushrooms), forbs,
grasses, mosses, nuts, pine straw, roots,
sedges, seeds, shrubs, transplants, tree
sap, and wildflowers. The term excludes
animals, animal parts, Christmas trees,
fence material, firewood, insects, mine
props, minerals, posts and poles, rails,
rocks, shingle and shake bolts, water,
worms, and soil.
Jkt 214001
Monitoring and revision of harvest
levels for forest botanical products for
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
purposes of the pilot program shall be
conducted as provided at § 223.219 of
subpart G.
§ 223.281
Disposition of collected fees.
(a) Funds collected under the pilot
program for the harvest and sale of
forest botanical products shall be
deposited into a special account in the
Treasury of the United States. These
funds shall be available for expenditure
at National Forests or National
Grasslands where the funds were
collected until September 30, 2010.
(b) Funds deposited into the special
account specified in paragraph (a) of
this section shall be expended at a
National Forest or National Grassland in
proportion to the fees collected at that
unit to pay for costs of: conducting
inventories of forest botanical products;
determining sustainable harvest levels
for each species or type of forest
botanical product; monitoring and
assessing the impact of harvest levels
and methods; conducting restoration
activities, including vegetation
restoration, necessitated by the
collection, harvest, or removal of forest
botanical products; or administering the
pilot program, including environmental
or other analyses.
Dated: September 25, 2007.
Abigail R. Kimbell,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E7–20658 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 97
[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–IN–0140; FRL–8481–
5]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; Indiana: Clean
Air Interstate Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing limited
approval of a revision to the Indiana
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted on February 28, 2007, as
amended by letter on September 20,
2007. This revision addresses the
requirements of EPA’s Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR), promulgated on
May 12, 2005, and subsequently revised
on April 28, 2006, and December 13,
2006. EPA is proposing to determine
that the Indiana SIP revision strengthens
the implementation plan for the State
because it makes progress toward
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 203 / Monday, October 22, 2007 / Proposed Rules
meeting Indiana’s emission reduction
requirements under the NOX SIP Call.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2007–0140, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312)886–5824.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R05–OAR–2007–
0140’’, John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: John M.
Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays. Please see
the direct final rule which is located in
the Rules section of this Federal
Register for detailed instructions on
how to submit comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6084,
paskevicz.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates
no adverse comments. A detailed
rationale for the approval is set forth in
the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received in response to
this rule, no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, EPA will withdraw the
direct final rule and will address all
public comments received in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note
that if EPA receives adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Oct 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E7–20250 Filed 10–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07–4129; MB Docket No. 07–210; RM–
11399]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Butte
Falls and Netarts, Oregon
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document requests
comments on a petition for rule making
filed by Oregon Radio Partners, LLC
(‘‘Petitioner’’) proposing the allotments
of Channel 290A at Butte Falls and
Channel 232C3 at Netarts, Oregon. The
proposed coordinates for Channel 290A
at Butte Falls are 42–36–19 NL and 122–
24–38 WL with a site restriction of 14.7
km (9.1 miles) northeast of city
reference and for Channel 232C3 at
Netarts are 45–27–56 NL and 123–58–11
WL with a site restriction of 4.0 km (2.5
miles) northwest of city reference. The
petition for rule making is a hybrid
contingent filing with two applications:
(1) For Station KTIL–FM, Channel
232C3 at Tillamook, Oregon to move to
Channel 232C2 at Government Camp,
Oregon (file no. BPH–0070125ADO);
and (2) for an unbuilt station, Channel
225A at Butte Falls, Oregon to move to
Talent, Oregon on the same channel (file
no. BNPH–20060310ACD). These
applications will be reviewed
separately.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before November 26, 2007, and reply
comments on or before December 11,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC,
interested parties should serve the
Petitioner and its counsel, as follows:
Oregon Radio Partners, LLC, c/o Lee J.
Peltzman, Esquire, Shainis & Peltzman,
Chartered, 1850 M Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202)
418–2180.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59507
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
07–210, adopted October 3, 2007, and
released October 5, 2007. The full text
of this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the
Commission’s Reference Information
Center, 445 Twelfth Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
may also be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractors,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. This document
does not contain proposed information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
The Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contact.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Radio broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.202
[Amended]
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM
Allotments under Oregon, is amended
by adding Butte Falls, Channel 290A;
and by adding Netarts, Channel 232C3.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59506-59507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20250]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 97
[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-IN-0140; FRL-8481-5]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Indiana:
Clean Air Interstate Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing limited approval of a revision to the Indiana
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on February 28, 2007, as
amended by letter on September 20, 2007. This revision addresses the
requirements of EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), promulgated on
May 12, 2005, and subsequently revised on April 28, 2006, and December
13, 2006. EPA is proposing to determine that the Indiana SIP revision
strengthens the implementation plan for the State because it makes
progress toward
[[Page 59507]]
meeting Indiana's emission reduction requirements under the
NOX SIP Call.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2007-0140, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312)886-5824.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0140'', John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal
hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business
are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section
of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6084, paskevicz.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a non-
controversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further
activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will
withdraw the direct final rule and will address all public comments
received in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see
the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E7-20250 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P