Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Final Free and Reserve Percentages for 2006-07 Crop Natural (sun-dried) Seedless Raisins, 59153-59157 [E7-20621]
Download as PDF
59153
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 202
Friday, October 19, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 989, both as amended (7
CFR part 989), regulating the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the order provisions now
in effect, final free and reserve
percentages may be established for
raisins acquired by handlers during the
crop year. This rule continues in effect
the action that established final free and
reserve percentages for NS raisins for
the 2006–07 crop year, which began
August 1, 2006, and ended July 31,
2007. This rule will not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0027; FV07–989–
1 FIR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California; Final Free and Reserve
Percentages for 2006–07 Crop Natural
(sun-dried) Seedless Raisins
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule that established final volume
regulation percentages for 2006–07 crop
Natural (sun-dried) Seedless (NS)
raisins covered under the Federal
marketing order for California raisins
(order). The order regulates the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California and is locally administered
by the Raisin Administrative Committee
(Committee). The volume regulation
percentages are 90 percent free and 10
percent reserve. The percentages are
intended to help stabilize raisin
supplies and prices, and strengthen
market conditions.
DATES: Effective Date: November 19,
2007. The volume regulation
percentages apply to acquisitions of NS
raisins from the 2006–07 crop until the
reserve raisins from that crop are
disposed of under the marketing order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901; Fax: (559) 487–5906; or E-mail:
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Oct 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule continues in effect the
action that established final volume
regulation percentages for 2006–07 crop
NS raisins covered under the order. The
volume regulation percentages are 90
percent free and 10 percent reserve and
were established through an interim
final rule published on April 9, 2007 (72
FR 17362). Free tonnage raisins may be
sold by handlers to any market. Reserve
raisins must be held in a pool for the
account of the Committee and are
disposed of through various programs
authorized under the order. For
example, reserve raisins may be sold by
the Committee to handlers for free use
or to replace part of the free tonnage
raisins they exported; used in diversion
programs; carried over as a hedge
against a short crop; or disposed of in
other outlets not competitive with those
for free tonnage raisins, such as
government purchase, distilleries, or
animal feed.
The volume regulation percentages
are intended to help stabilize raisin
supplies and prices, and strengthen
market conditions. The Committee
unanimously recommended final
percentages for NS raisins on November
21, 2006.
Computation of Trade Demands
Section 989.54 of the order prescribes
procedures and time frames to be
followed in establishing volume
regulation. This includes methodology
used to calculate percentages. Pursuant
to § 989.54(a) of the order, the
Committee met on August 15, 2006, to
review shipment and inventory data,
and other matters relating to the
supplies of raisins of all varietal types.
The Committee computed a trade
demand for each varietal type for which
a free tonnage percentage might be
recommended. Trade demand is
computed using a formula specified in
the order and, for each varietal type, is
equal to 90 percent of the prior year’s
shipments of free tonnage and reserve
tonnage raisins sold for free use into all
market outlets, adjusted by subtracting
the carryin on August 1 of the current
crop year, and adding the desirable
carryout at the end of that crop year. As
specified in § 989.154(a), the desirable
carryout for NS raisins shall equal the
total shipments of free tonnage during
August and September for each of the
past 5 crop years, converted to a natural
condition basis, dropping the high and
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
59154
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 202 / Friday, October 19, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
low figures, and dividing the remaining
sum by three, or 60,000 natural
condition tons, whichever is higher. For
all other varietal types, the desirable
carryout shall equal the total shipments
of free tonnage during August,
September and one-half of October for
each of the past 5 crop years, converted
to a natural condition basis, dropping
the high and low figures, and dividing
the remaining sum by three. In
accordance with these provisions, the
Committee computed and announced
the 2006–07 trade demand for NS
raisins at 219,870 tons as shown below.
COMPUTED TRADE DEMAND
[Natural condition tons]
NS Raisins
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Prior year’s shipments ........
Multiplied by 90 percent .....
Equals adjusted base .........
Minus carryin inventory ......
Plus desirable carryout .......
Equals computed NS trade
demand ...........................
301,460
0.90
271,314
111,444
60,000
219,870
Computation of Preliminary Volume
Regulation Percentages
Section 989.54(b) of the order requires
that the Committee announce, on or
before October 5, preliminary crop
estimates and determine whether
volume regulation is warranted for the
varietal types for which it computed a
trade demand. That section allows the
Committee to extend the October 5 date
up to 5 business days if warranted by a
late crop.
The Committee met on September 6,
2006, and announced preliminary
percentages for Zante Currant raisins. It
met again on October 4, 2006, and
announced preliminary percentages and
a preliminary crop estimate for NS
raisins of 259,557 tons, which is about
21 percent lower than the 10-year
average of 327,410 tons. NS raisins are
the major varietal type of California
raisin. Adding the carryin inventory of
111,444 tons to the 259,557-ton crop
estimate, plus an additional 31,975 tons
of reserve raisins released to handlers
for free use in August 2006, resulted in
a total available supply of 402,976 tons,
which was significantly higher (183
percent) than the 219,870-ton trade
demand. Thus, the Committee
determined that volume regulation for
NS raisins was warranted. The
Committee announced preliminary free
and reserve percentages for NS raisins,
which released 85 percent of the
computed trade demand since a
minimum field price (price paid by
handlers to producers for their free
tonnage raisins) had been established.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Oct 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
The preliminary percentages were 72
percent free and 28 percent reserve.
In addition, preliminary percentages
were announced for Dipped Seedless,
Golden Seedless, and Other Seedless
raisins. It was ultimately determined at
Committee meetings held on November
21, 2006, and January 23, 2007, that
volume regulation was only warranted
for NS raisins. As in past seasons, the
Committee submitted its marketing
policy to USDA for review.
Computation of Final Volume
Regulation Percentages
Pursuant to § 989.54(c), at its
November 21, 2006, meeting, the
Committee announced interim
percentages for NS raisins to release
slightly less than the full trade demand.
Based on a revised NS crop estimate of
244,300 tons (down from the October
estimate of 259,557 tons), interim
percentages for NS raisins were
announced at 89.75 percent free and
10.25 percent reserve.
Pursuant to § 989.54(d), the
Committee also recommended final
percentages at its November 21, 2006,
meeting to release the full trade demand
for NS raisins. Final percentages were
recommended at 90 percent free and 10
percent reserve. The Committee’s
calculations and determinations to
arrive at final percentages for NS raisins
are shown in the table below:
FINAL VOLUME REGULATION
PERCENTAGES
[Natural condition tons]
NS Raisins
Trade demand ....................
Divided by crop estimate ....
Equals the free percentage
100 minus free percentage
equals the reserve percentage ...........................
219,870
244,300
90.00
10.00
By the end of the crop year, final
deliveries of NS raisins totaled 282,999
tons. Thus, handlers were provided
with an additional 63,129 tons over the
computed trade demand, but the
additional tonnage did not appear to
impact marketing conditions.
In addition, USDA’s ‘‘Guidelines for
Fruit, Vegetable, and Specialty Crop
Marketing Orders’’ (Guidelines) specify
that 110 percent of recent years’ sales
should be made available to primary
markets each season for marketing
orders utilizing reserve pool authority.
This goal was met for NS raisins by the
establishment of final percentages,
which released 100 percent of the trade
demand and the offer of additional
reserve raisins for sale to handlers under
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the ‘‘10 plus 10 offers.’’ As specified in
§ 989.54(g), the 10 plus 10 offers are two
offers of reserve pool raisins which are
made available to handlers during each
season. For each such offer, a quantity
of reserve raisins equal to 10 percent of
the prior year’s shipments is made
available for free use. Handlers may sell
their 10 plus 10 raisins to any market.
Based on 2005–06 NS shipments of
301,460 natural condition tons, 30,146
tons should have been made available in
each of the 10 plus 10 offers, or a total
of 60,292 tons. However, this amount
was not available in the reserve. Thus,
all available reserve pool raisins were
offered to handlers for free use through
the 10 plus 10 offers.
The first 10 plus 10 offer was made
in February 2007. A total of 30,146 tons
was made available to raisin handlers;
all the raisins were purchased and
released to handlers during the 2006–07
crop year. The second offer was made in
July 2007. A total of 20,923 tons (the
balance of the reserve pool) was made
available to handlers; 14,793 tons were
purchased and released to handlers in
2007–08. Adding the 30,146 tons of 10
plus 10 reserve raisins to the 219,870
ton trade demand figure, plus the
111,444 tons of 2005–06 carryin NS
inventory, plus the 31,975 tons of 10
plus 10 raisins released to handlers in
August 2006, equates to 393,435 tons of
natural condition raisins, or 370,686
tons of packed raisins, that were
available to handlers for free use or
primary markets. This is about 130
percent of the quantity of NS raisins
shipped during the 2005–06 crop year
(301,460 natural condition tons or
284,030 packed tons).
In addition to the 10 plus 10 offers,
§ 989.67(j) of the order provides
authority for sales of reserve raisins to
handlers under certain conditions such
as a national emergency, crop failure,
change in economic or marketing
conditions, or if free tonnage shipments
in the current crop year exceed
shipments during a comparable period
of the prior crop year. Such reserve
raisins may be sold by handlers to any
market. When implemented, the
additional offers of reserve raisins make
even more raisins available to primary
markets, which is consistent with
USDA’s Guidelines.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 202 / Friday, October 19, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 23 handlers
of California raisins who are subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 4,000 raisin producers in
the regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. No more than 10 handlers,
and a majority of producers, of
California raisins may be classified as
small entities. Thirteen of the 23
handlers subject to regulation have
annual sales estimated to be at least
$6,500,000, and the remaining 10
handlers have sales less than
$6,500,000.
Since 1949, the California raisin
industry has operated under a Federal
marketing order. The order contains
authority to, among other things, limit
the portion of a given year’s crop that
can be marketed freely in any outlet by
raisin handlers. This volume control
mechanism is used to stabilize supplies
and prices and strengthen market
conditions. If the primary market (the
normal domestic market) is oversupplied with raisins, grower prices
decline substantially.
Pursuant to § 989.54(d) of the order,
this rule continues in effect the action
that established final volume regulation
percentages for 2006–07 crop NS
raisins. The volume regulation
percentages are 90 percent free and 10
percent reserve. Free tonnage raisins
may be sold by handlers to any market.
Reserve raisins must be held in a pool
for the account of the Committee and
are disposed of through certain
programs authorized under the order.
Volume regulation was warranted this
season because acquisitions of 282,999
tons through July 31, 2007, combined
with the carryin inventory of 111,444
tons, plus 31,975 tons of 10 plus 10
reserve raisins that were released to
handlers in August 2006, resulted in a
total available supply of 426,418 tons,
which is about 194 percent higher than
the 219,870 ton trade demand.
The volume regulation procedures
have helped the industry address its
marketing problems by keeping supplies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Oct 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
in balance with domestic and export
market needs, and strengthening market
conditions. The volume regulation
procedures fully supply the domestic
and export markets, provide for market
expansion, and help reduce the burden
of oversupplies in the domestic market.
Raisin grapes are a perennial crop, so
production in any year is dependent
upon plantings made in earlier years.
The sun-drying method of producing
raisins involves considerable risk
because of variable weather patterns.
Even though the product and the
industry are viewed as mature, the
industry has experienced considerable
change over the last several decades.
Before the 1975–76 crop year, more than
50 percent of the raisins were packed
and sold directly to consumers. Now,
about 64 percent of raisins are sold in
bulk. This means that raisins are now
sold to consumers mostly as an
ingredient in another product such as
cereal and baked goods. In addition, for
a few years in the early 1970s, over 50
percent of the raisin grapes were sold to
the wine market for crushing. Since
then, the percent of raisin-variety grapes
sold to the wine industry has decreased.
California’s grapes are classified into
three groups—table grapes, wine grapes,
and raisin-variety grapes. Raisin-variety
grapes are the most versatile of the three
types. They can be marketed as fresh
grapes, crushed for juice in the
production of wine or juice concentrate,
or dried into raisins. Annual
fluctuations in the fresh grape, wine,
and concentrate markets, as well as
weather-related factors, cause
fluctuations in raisin supply. This type
of situation introduces a certain amount
of variability into the raisin market.
Although the size of the crop for raisinvariety grapes may be known, the
amount dried for raisins depends on the
demand for crushing. This makes the
marketing of raisins a more difficult
task. These supply fluctuations can
result in producer price instability and
disorderly market conditions.
Volume regulation is helpful to the
raisin industry because it lessens the
impact of such fluctuations and
contributes to orderly marketing. For
example, producer prices for NS raisins
remained fairly steady between the
1993–94 through the 1997–98 seasons,
although production varied. As shown
in the table below, during those years,
production varied from a low of 272,063
tons in 1996–97 to a high of 387,007
tons in 1993–94.
According to Committee data, the
total producer return per ton during
those years, which includes proceeds
from both free tonnage plus reserve pool
raisins, has varied from a low of $904.60
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59155
in 1993–94 to a high of $1,049.20 in
1996–97. Total producer prices for the
1998–99 and 1999–2000 seasons
increased significantly due to back-toback short crops during those years.
Record large crops followed and
producer prices dropped dramatically
for the 2000–01 through 2003–04 crop
years, as inventories grew while
demand stagnated. However, producer
prices were higher for the 2004–05 and
the 2005–06 crop years, as noted below:
NATURAL SEEDLESS PRODUCER
PRICES
Crop year
2005–06 ............
2004–05 ............
2003–04 ............
2002–03 ............
2001–02 ............
2000–01 ............
1999–2000 ........
1998–99 ............
1997–98 ............
1996–97 ............
1995–96 ............
1994–95 ............
1993–94 ............
Deliveries
(natural
condition
tons)
319,126
265,262
296,864
388,010
377,328
432,616
299,910
240,469
382,448
272,063
325,911
378,427
387,007
Producer
prices
(per ton)
1 $998.25
2 1210.00
567.00
491.20
650.94
603.36
1,211.25
2 1,290.00
946.52
1,049.20
1,007.19
928.27
904.60
1 Return-to-date,
2 No
reserve pool still open.
volume regulation.
There are essentially two broad
markets for raisins—domestic and
export. Domestic shipments have been
generally increasing in recent years.
Although domestic shipments decreased
from a high of 204,805 packed tons
during the 1990–91 crop year to a low
of 156,325 packed tons in 1999–2000,
they increased from 174,117 packed
tons during the 2000–01 crop year to
186,358 tons during the 2005–06 crop
year. Export shipments ranged from a
high of 107,931 packed tons in 1991–92
to a low of 91,599 packed tons in the
1999–2000 crop year. Since that time,
export shipments increased to 106,755
tons of raisins during the 2004–05 crop
year, but fell to 97,672 tons in 2005–06.
The per capita consumption of raisins
has declined from 2.07 pounds in 1988
to 1.44 pounds in 2005. This decrease
is consistent with the decrease in the
per capita consumption of dried fruits
in general, which is due to the
increasing availability of most types of
fresh fruit throughout the year.
While the overall demand for raisins
has increased in two out of the last three
years (as reflected in increased
commercial shipments), production has
been decreasing. Deliveries of NS dried
raisins from producers to handlers
reached an all-time high of 432,616 tons
in the 2000–01 crop year. This large
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
59156
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 202 / Friday, October 19, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
crop was preceded by two short crop
years; deliveries were 240,469 tons in
1998–99 and 299,910 tons in 1999–
2000. Deliveries for the 2000–01 crop
year soared to a record level because of
increased bearing acreage and yields.
Deliveries for the 2001–02 crop year
were at 377,328 tons, 388,010 tons for
the 2002–03 crop year, 296,864 for the
2003–04 crop year, and 265,262 tons for
the 2004–05 crop year. After three crop
years of high production and a large
2001–02 carryin inventory, the industry
diverted raisin production to other uses
or removed bearing vines. Diversions/
removals totaled 41,000 acres in 2001;
27,000 acres in 2002; and 15,000 acres
of vines in 2003. These actions resulted
in declining deliveries of 296,864 tons
for the 2003–04 crop year and 265,262
tons for the 2004–05 crop year.
Although deliveries increased in 2005–
06 to 319,126 tons, this may have been
because fewer growers opted to contract
with wineries, as raisin variety grapes
crushed in 2005–06 decreased by
161,000 green tons, the equivalent of
over 40,000 tons of raisins.
The order permits the industry to
exercise supply control provisions,
which allow for the establishment of
free and reserve percentages, and
establishment of a reserve pool. One of
the primary purposes of establishing
free and reserve percentages is to
equilibrate supply and demand. If raisin
markets are over-supplied with product,
producer prices will decline.
Raisins are generally marketed at
relatively lower price levels in the more
elastic export market than in the more
inelastic domestic market. This results
in a larger volume of raisins being
marketed and enhances producer
returns. In addition, this system allows
the U.S. raisin industry to be more
competitive in export markets.
The reserve percentage limits what
handlers can market as free tonnage.
Data available as of July 31, 2007,
showed that deliveries of NS raisins
were at 282,999 tons. The 10 percent
reserve limited the total free tonnage to
254,699 natural condition tons (.90 × the
282,999 ton crop). Adding the 254,699
ton figure with the carryin of 111,444
tons, plus the 62,121 tons of 10 plus 10
reserve raisins that were released to
handlers during the 2006–07 crop year
(31,975 tons in August 2006 and 30,146
tons in March 2007) made the total free
supply equal to 428,264 natural
condition tons.
To assess the impact that volume
regulation has on the prices producers
receive for their product, a price
dependent econometric model was
estimated. This model is used to
estimate producer prices both with and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Oct 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
without the use of volume regulation.
The volume regulation used by the
raisin industry would result in
decreased shipments to primary
markets. Without volume regulation the
primary market (domestic) could be
over-supplied resulting in lower
producer prices and the build-up of
unwanted inventories.
With volume regulation, producer
prices are estimated to be approximately
$65 per ton higher than without volume
regulation. This price increase is
beneficial to all producers regardless of
size and enhances producers’ total
revenues in comparison to no volume
regulation. Establishing a reserve allows
the industry to help stabilize supplies in
both domestic and export markets,
while improving returns to producers.
Free and reserve percentages are
established by varietal type, and usually
in years when the supply exceeds the
trade demand by a large enough margin
that the Committee believes volume
regulation is necessary to maintain
market stability. Accordingly, in
assessing whether to apply volume
regulation or, as an alternative, not to
apply such regulation, it was
determined that volume regulation was
warranted during the 2006–07 season
for only one of the nine raisin varietal
types defined under the order.
The free and reserve percentages
continue in effect the release of the full
trade demand and apply uniformly to
all handlers in the industry, regardless
of size. For NS raisins, with the
exception of the 1998–99 and 2004–05
crop years, small and large raisin
producers and handlers have been
operating under volume regulation
percentages every year since 1983–84.
There are no known additional costs
incurred by small handlers that are not
incurred by large handlers. While the
level of benefits of this rulemaking is
difficult to quantify, the stabilizing
effects of the volume regulations impact
small and large handlers positively by
helping them maintain and expand
markets even though raisin supplies
fluctuate widely from season to season.
Likewise, price stability positively
impacts small and large producers by
allowing them to better anticipate the
revenues their raisins will generate.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
There are some reporting,
recordkeeping and other compliance
requirements under the order. The
reporting and recordkeeping burdens
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
are necessary for compliance purposes
and for developing statistical data for
maintenance of the program. The
requirements are the same as those
applied in past seasons. Thus, this
action imposes no additional reporting
or recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large raisin handlers. The forms
require information which is readily
available from handler records and
which can be provided without data
processing equipment or trained
statistical staff. The information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements have been previously
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control
No. 0581–0178. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, as noted in
the initial regulatory analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule.
Further, the Committee’s meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
raisin industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meetings and participate in the
Committee’s deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the August 15,
September 6, October 4, November 21,
2006, and the January 23, 2007,
meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Also, the Committee has a number of
appointed subcommittees to review
certain issues and make
recommendations to the Committee.
The Committee’s Reserve Sales and
Marketing Subcommittee met on August
15, September 6, October 4, November
21, 2006, and January 23, 2007, and
discussed these issues in detail. Those
meetings were also public meetings and
both large and small entities were able
to participate and express their views.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on April 9, 2007. Copies of the
rule were mailed by the Committee’s
staff to all Committee members and
alternates and raisin handlers. In
addition, the rule was made available
through the Internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. That rule
provided for a 60-day comment period
which ended June 8, 2007. One
comment was received during the
comment period; it was not relevant to
the rulemaking action. Accordingly, no
changes were made to the rule, based on
comment received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 202 / Friday, October 19, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 17362, April 9, 2007)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 989 which was
published at 72 FR 17362 on April 9,
2007, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
I
Dated: October 15, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–20621 Filed 10–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Chapter I
RIN 3150–AH84
Notification of the Plan for the
Transition of Regulatory Authority
Resulting From the Expanded
Definition of Byproduct Material
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of publication of
transition plan.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
651e of the Energy Policy Act of 2005,
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission is publishing a ‘‘Plan for
the Transition of Regulatory Authority
Resulting from the Expanded Definition
of Byproduct Material’’ (transition plan)
to facilitate an orderly transition of
regulatory authority with respect to the
byproduct material defined in
paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 11e. of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended. A copy of the final transition
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Oct 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
plan is provided as Appendix A to this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
K. Lukes, Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
6701 or e-mail KXK2@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of October, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
Appendix A—A Plan for the Transition
of Regulatory Authority Resulting From
the Expanded Definition of Byproduct
Material
I. Introduction
The Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct) expanded U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) regulatory authority over
radioactive materials to include new
byproduct material, as defined in
paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 11e. of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (AEA), hereinafter referred to
as the new byproduct material. The
expanded NRC authority pre-empted
existing State regulatory authority over
the subject materials. NRC is authorized,
however, to discontinue its regulatory
authority over the new byproduct
material under certain conditions,
allowing States to exercise regulatory
authority over these materials.
The EPAct requires the Commission
to prepare and publish a transition plan
to facilitate an orderly transition of
regulatory authority with respect to the
new byproduct material. The plan must
address States that have, before the date
on which the plan is published, entered
into agreements with the Commission,
under section 274b. of the AEA 1
(Agreement States), and States that have
not entered into such agreements (nonAgreement States). The plan must also
include a description of the conditions
under which a State may exercise
regulatory authority over the new
byproduct material.
To meet the requirements of the
EPAct, the transition plan must include
a statement of the Commission that any
Agreement between the Commission
and a State 2 under section 274b. of the
1 Section 274b. of the AEA authorizes the
Commission to enter into an agreement with the
Governor of a State that provides for discontinuance
of the Commission’s regulatory authority in the
State over byproduct material as defined in section
11e., source materials, and special nuclear materials
in quantities not sufficient to form a critical mass.
2 Section 274n. of the AEA defines the term
‘‘State’’ to mean any State, Territory, or possession
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59157
AEA, covering byproduct material and
entered into before the date of
publication of the transition plan, must
be considered to include the new
byproduct material, if the Governor of
the State certifies to the Commission, on
the date of the publication of the
transition plan that: (1) The State has a
program for licensing the new
byproduct material that is adequate to
protect the public health and safety, as
determined by the Commission; and (2)
the State intends to continue to
implement the regulatory responsibility
of the State with respect to the new
byproduct material. This transition plan
is being promulgated in response to
those requirements.
II. Background
On August 8, 2005, the President
signed into law the Energy Policy Act of
2005. Public Law No. 109–58, 119 Stat
594 (2005). Before then, byproduct
material had been defined in section
11e. of the AEA as: (1) Any radioactive
material (except special nuclear
material) yielded in or made radioactive
by exposure to the radiation incident to
the process of producing or using
special nuclear material; and (2) the
tailings or wastes produced by the
extraction or concentration of uranium
or thorium from any ore processed
primarily for its source material content.
Section 651(e) of the EPAct, among
other things, expanded the definition of
byproduct material in section 11e. of the
AEA, thereby placing additional
byproduct material under NRC’s
jurisdiction. Section 651(e) further
required the Commission to provide a
regulatory framework for licensing and
regulating this additional byproduct
material.
In particular, section 651(e) of the
EPAct expanded the definition of
byproduct material by adding
paragraphs (3) and (4) to the definition
of byproduct material in section 11e.
Section 11e.(3) defines, as byproduct
material:
‘‘(A) any discrete source of radium-226 that
is produced, extracted, or converted after
extraction, before, on, or after the date of
enactment of this paragraph for use for a
commercial, medical, or research activity; or
(B) any material that—
(i) has been made radioactive by use of a
particle accelerator; and
(ii) is produced, extracted, or converted
after extraction, before, on, or after the date
of enactment of this paragraph for use for a
commercial, medical, or research activity.
Section 11e.(4) defines, as byproduct
material, any discrete source of
of the United States, the Canal Zone, Puerto Rico,
and the District of Columbia.
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 202 (Friday, October 19, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59153-59157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20621]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 202 / Friday, October 19, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 59153]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0027; FV07-989-1 FIR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Final Free and
Reserve Percentages for 2006-07 Crop Natural (sun-dried) Seedless
Raisins
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule that established final
volume regulation percentages for 2006-07 crop Natural (sun-dried)
Seedless (NS) raisins covered under the Federal marketing order for
California raisins (order). The order regulates the handling of raisins
produced from grapes grown in California and is locally administered by
the Raisin Administrative Committee (Committee). The volume regulation
percentages are 90 percent free and 10 percent reserve. The percentages
are intended to help stabilize raisin supplies and prices, and
strengthen market conditions.
DATES: Effective Date: November 19, 2007. The volume regulation
percentages apply to acquisitions of NS raisins from the 2006-07 crop
until the reserve raisins from that crop are disposed of under the
marketing order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist,
or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901; Fax: (559) 487-5906; or E-mail:
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 989, both as amended (7 CFR part 989),
regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the order provisions now in effect, final free
and reserve percentages may be established for raisins acquired by
handlers during the crop year. This rule continues in effect the action
that established final free and reserve percentages for NS raisins for
the 2006-07 crop year, which began August 1, 2006, and ended July 31,
2007. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations,
or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the action that established final
volume regulation percentages for 2006-07 crop NS raisins covered under
the order. The volume regulation percentages are 90 percent free and 10
percent reserve and were established through an interim final rule
published on April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17362). Free tonnage raisins may be
sold by handlers to any market. Reserve raisins must be held in a pool
for the account of the Committee and are disposed of through various
programs authorized under the order. For example, reserve raisins may
be sold by the Committee to handlers for free use or to replace part of
the free tonnage raisins they exported; used in diversion programs;
carried over as a hedge against a short crop; or disposed of in other
outlets not competitive with those for free tonnage raisins, such as
government purchase, distilleries, or animal feed.
The volume regulation percentages are intended to help stabilize
raisin supplies and prices, and strengthen market conditions. The
Committee unanimously recommended final percentages for NS raisins on
November 21, 2006.
Computation of Trade Demands
Section 989.54 of the order prescribes procedures and time frames
to be followed in establishing volume regulation. This includes
methodology used to calculate percentages. Pursuant to Sec. 989.54(a)
of the order, the Committee met on August 15, 2006, to review shipment
and inventory data, and other matters relating to the supplies of
raisins of all varietal types. The Committee computed a trade demand
for each varietal type for which a free tonnage percentage might be
recommended. Trade demand is computed using a formula specified in the
order and, for each varietal type, is equal to 90 percent of the prior
year's shipments of free tonnage and reserve tonnage raisins sold for
free use into all market outlets, adjusted by subtracting the carryin
on August 1 of the current crop year, and adding the desirable carryout
at the end of that crop year. As specified in Sec. 989.154(a), the
desirable carryout for NS raisins shall equal the total shipments of
free tonnage during August and September for each of the past 5 crop
years, converted to a natural condition basis, dropping the high and
[[Page 59154]]
low figures, and dividing the remaining sum by three, or 60,000 natural
condition tons, whichever is higher. For all other varietal types, the
desirable carryout shall equal the total shipments of free tonnage
during August, September and one-half of October for each of the past 5
crop years, converted to a natural condition basis, dropping the high
and low figures, and dividing the remaining sum by three. In accordance
with these provisions, the Committee computed and announced the 2006-07
trade demand for NS raisins at 219,870 tons as shown below.
Computed Trade Demand
[Natural condition tons]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS Raisins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior year's shipments.................................. 301,460
Multiplied by 90 percent................................ 0.90
Equals adjusted base.................................... 271,314
Minus carryin inventory................................. 111,444
Plus desirable carryout................................. 60,000
Equals computed NS trade demand......................... 219,870
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computation of Preliminary Volume Regulation Percentages
Section 989.54(b) of the order requires that the Committee
announce, on or before October 5, preliminary crop estimates and
determine whether volume regulation is warranted for the varietal types
for which it computed a trade demand. That section allows the Committee
to extend the October 5 date up to 5 business days if warranted by a
late crop.
The Committee met on September 6, 2006, and announced preliminary
percentages for Zante Currant raisins. It met again on October 4, 2006,
and announced preliminary percentages and a preliminary crop estimate
for NS raisins of 259,557 tons, which is about 21 percent lower than
the 10-year average of 327,410 tons. NS raisins are the major varietal
type of California raisin. Adding the carryin inventory of 111,444 tons
to the 259,557-ton crop estimate, plus an additional 31,975 tons of
reserve raisins released to handlers for free use in August 2006,
resulted in a total available supply of 402,976 tons, which was
significantly higher (183 percent) than the 219,870-ton trade demand.
Thus, the Committee determined that volume regulation for NS raisins
was warranted. The Committee announced preliminary free and reserve
percentages for NS raisins, which released 85 percent of the computed
trade demand since a minimum field price (price paid by handlers to
producers for their free tonnage raisins) had been established. The
preliminary percentages were 72 percent free and 28 percent reserve.
In addition, preliminary percentages were announced for Dipped
Seedless, Golden Seedless, and Other Seedless raisins. It was
ultimately determined at Committee meetings held on November 21, 2006,
and January 23, 2007, that volume regulation was only warranted for NS
raisins. As in past seasons, the Committee submitted its marketing
policy to USDA for review.
Computation of Final Volume Regulation Percentages
Pursuant to Sec. 989.54(c), at its November 21, 2006, meeting, the
Committee announced interim percentages for NS raisins to release
slightly less than the full trade demand. Based on a revised NS crop
estimate of 244,300 tons (down from the October estimate of 259,557
tons), interim percentages for NS raisins were announced at 89.75
percent free and 10.25 percent reserve.
Pursuant to Sec. 989.54(d), the Committee also recommended final
percentages at its November 21, 2006, meeting to release the full trade
demand for NS raisins. Final percentages were recommended at 90 percent
free and 10 percent reserve. The Committee's calculations and
determinations to arrive at final percentages for NS raisins are shown
in the table below:
Final Volume Regulation Percentages
[Natural condition tons]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS Raisins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trade demand............................................ 219,870
Divided by crop estimate................................ 244,300
Equals the free percentage.............................. 90.00
100 minus free percentage equals the reserve percentage. 10.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the end of the crop year, final deliveries of NS raisins totaled
282,999 tons. Thus, handlers were provided with an additional 63,129
tons over the computed trade demand, but the additional tonnage did not
appear to impact marketing conditions.
In addition, USDA's ``Guidelines for Fruit, Vegetable, and
Specialty Crop Marketing Orders'' (Guidelines) specify that 110 percent
of recent years' sales should be made available to primary markets each
season for marketing orders utilizing reserve pool authority. This goal
was met for NS raisins by the establishment of final percentages, which
released 100 percent of the trade demand and the offer of additional
reserve raisins for sale to handlers under the ``10 plus 10 offers.''
As specified in Sec. 989.54(g), the 10 plus 10 offers are two offers
of reserve pool raisins which are made available to handlers during
each season. For each such offer, a quantity of reserve raisins equal
to 10 percent of the prior year's shipments is made available for free
use. Handlers may sell their 10 plus 10 raisins to any market.
Based on 2005-06 NS shipments of 301,460 natural condition tons,
30,146 tons should have been made available in each of the 10 plus 10
offers, or a total of 60,292 tons. However, this amount was not
available in the reserve. Thus, all available reserve pool raisins were
offered to handlers for free use through the 10 plus 10 offers.
The first 10 plus 10 offer was made in February 2007. A total of
30,146 tons was made available to raisin handlers; all the raisins were
purchased and released to handlers during the 2006-07 crop year. The
second offer was made in July 2007. A total of 20,923 tons (the balance
of the reserve pool) was made available to handlers; 14,793 tons were
purchased and released to handlers in 2007-08. Adding the 30,146 tons
of 10 plus 10 reserve raisins to the 219,870 ton trade demand figure,
plus the 111,444 tons of 2005-06 carryin NS inventory, plus the 31,975
tons of 10 plus 10 raisins released to handlers in August 2006, equates
to 393,435 tons of natural condition raisins, or 370,686 tons of packed
raisins, that were available to handlers for free use or primary
markets. This is about 130 percent of the quantity of NS raisins
shipped during the 2005-06 crop year (301,460 natural condition tons or
284,030 packed tons).
In addition to the 10 plus 10 offers, Sec. 989.67(j) of the order
provides authority for sales of reserve raisins to handlers under
certain conditions such as a national emergency, crop failure, change
in economic or marketing conditions, or if free tonnage shipments in
the current crop year exceed shipments during a comparable period of
the prior crop year. Such reserve raisins may be sold by handlers to
any market. When implemented, the additional offers of reserve raisins
make even more raisins available to primary markets, which is
consistent with USDA's Guidelines.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
[[Page 59155]]
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 23 handlers of California raisins who are
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 4,000 raisin
producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000. No more than 10 handlers, and a majority of
producers, of California raisins may be classified as small entities.
Thirteen of the 23 handlers subject to regulation have annual sales
estimated to be at least $6,500,000, and the remaining 10 handlers have
sales less than $6,500,000.
Since 1949, the California raisin industry has operated under a
Federal marketing order. The order contains authority to, among other
things, limit the portion of a given year's crop that can be marketed
freely in any outlet by raisin handlers. This volume control mechanism
is used to stabilize supplies and prices and strengthen market
conditions. If the primary market (the normal domestic market) is over-
supplied with raisins, grower prices decline substantially.
Pursuant to Sec. 989.54(d) of the order, this rule continues in
effect the action that established final volume regulation percentages
for 2006-07 crop NS raisins. The volume regulation percentages are 90
percent free and 10 percent reserve. Free tonnage raisins may be sold
by handlers to any market. Reserve raisins must be held in a pool for
the account of the Committee and are disposed of through certain
programs authorized under the order.
Volume regulation was warranted this season because acquisitions of
282,999 tons through July 31, 2007, combined with the carryin inventory
of 111,444 tons, plus 31,975 tons of 10 plus 10 reserve raisins that
were released to handlers in August 2006, resulted in a total available
supply of 426,418 tons, which is about 194 percent higher than the
219,870 ton trade demand.
The volume regulation procedures have helped the industry address
its marketing problems by keeping supplies in balance with domestic and
export market needs, and strengthening market conditions. The volume
regulation procedures fully supply the domestic and export markets,
provide for market expansion, and help reduce the burden of
oversupplies in the domestic market.
Raisin grapes are a perennial crop, so production in any year is
dependent upon plantings made in earlier years. The sun-drying method
of producing raisins involves considerable risk because of variable
weather patterns.
Even though the product and the industry are viewed as mature, the
industry has experienced considerable change over the last several
decades. Before the 1975-76 crop year, more than 50 percent of the
raisins were packed and sold directly to consumers. Now, about 64
percent of raisins are sold in bulk. This means that raisins are now
sold to consumers mostly as an ingredient in another product such as
cereal and baked goods. In addition, for a few years in the early
1970s, over 50 percent of the raisin grapes were sold to the wine
market for crushing. Since then, the percent of raisin-variety grapes
sold to the wine industry has decreased.
California's grapes are classified into three groups--table grapes,
wine grapes, and raisin-variety grapes. Raisin-variety grapes are the
most versatile of the three types. They can be marketed as fresh
grapes, crushed for juice in the production of wine or juice
concentrate, or dried into raisins. Annual fluctuations in the fresh
grape, wine, and concentrate markets, as well as weather-related
factors, cause fluctuations in raisin supply. This type of situation
introduces a certain amount of variability into the raisin market.
Although the size of the crop for raisin-variety grapes may be known,
the amount dried for raisins depends on the demand for crushing. This
makes the marketing of raisins a more difficult task. These supply
fluctuations can result in producer price instability and disorderly
market conditions.
Volume regulation is helpful to the raisin industry because it
lessens the impact of such fluctuations and contributes to orderly
marketing. For example, producer prices for NS raisins remained fairly
steady between the 1993-94 through the 1997-98 seasons, although
production varied. As shown in the table below, during those years,
production varied from a low of 272,063 tons in 1996-97 to a high of
387,007 tons in 1993-94.
According to Committee data, the total producer return per ton
during those years, which includes proceeds from both free tonnage plus
reserve pool raisins, has varied from a low of $904.60 in 1993-94 to a
high of $1,049.20 in 1996-97. Total producer prices for the 1998-99 and
1999-2000 seasons increased significantly due to back-to-back short
crops during those years. Record large crops followed and producer
prices dropped dramatically for the 2000-01 through 2003-04 crop years,
as inventories grew while demand stagnated. However, producer prices
were higher for the 2004-05 and the 2005-06 crop years, as noted below:
Natural Seedless Producer Prices
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deliveries
(natural Producer
Crop year condition prices
tons) (per ton)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005-06....................................... 319,126 \1\ $998.25
2004-05....................................... 265,262 \2\ 1210.00
2003-04....................................... 296,864 567.00
2002-03....................................... 388,010 491.20
2001-02....................................... 377,328 650.94
2000-01....................................... 432,616 603.36
1999-2000..................................... 299,910 1,211.25
1998-99....................................... 240,469 \2\
1,290.00
1997-98....................................... 382,448 946.52
1996-97....................................... 272,063 1,049.20
1995-96....................................... 325,911 1,007.19
1994-95....................................... 378,427 928.27
1993-94....................................... 387,007 904.60
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Return-to-date, reserve pool still open.
\2\ No volume regulation.
There are essentially two broad markets for raisins--domestic and
export. Domestic shipments have been generally increasing in recent
years. Although domestic shipments decreased from a high of 204,805
packed tons during the 1990-91 crop year to a low of 156,325 packed
tons in 1999-2000, they increased from 174,117 packed tons during the
2000-01 crop year to 186,358 tons during the 2005-06 crop year. Export
shipments ranged from a high of 107,931 packed tons in 1991-92 to a low
of 91,599 packed tons in the 1999-2000 crop year. Since that time,
export shipments increased to 106,755 tons of raisins during the 2004-
05 crop year, but fell to 97,672 tons in 2005-06.
The per capita consumption of raisins has declined from 2.07 pounds
in 1988 to 1.44 pounds in 2005. This decrease is consistent with the
decrease in the per capita consumption of dried fruits in general,
which is due to the increasing availability of most types of fresh
fruit throughout the year.
While the overall demand for raisins has increased in two out of
the last three years (as reflected in increased commercial shipments),
production has been decreasing. Deliveries of NS dried raisins from
producers to handlers reached an all-time high of 432,616 tons in the
2000-01 crop year. This large
[[Page 59156]]
crop was preceded by two short crop years; deliveries were 240,469 tons
in 1998-99 and 299,910 tons in 1999-2000. Deliveries for the 2000-01
crop year soared to a record level because of increased bearing acreage
and yields. Deliveries for the 2001-02 crop year were at 377,328 tons,
388,010 tons for the 2002-03 crop year, 296,864 for the 2003-04 crop
year, and 265,262 tons for the 2004-05 crop year. After three crop
years of high production and a large 2001-02 carryin inventory, the
industry diverted raisin production to other uses or removed bearing
vines. Diversions/removals totaled 41,000 acres in 2001; 27,000 acres
in 2002; and 15,000 acres of vines in 2003. These actions resulted in
declining deliveries of 296,864 tons for the 2003-04 crop year and
265,262 tons for the 2004-05 crop year. Although deliveries increased
in 2005-06 to 319,126 tons, this may have been because fewer growers
opted to contract with wineries, as raisin variety grapes crushed in
2005-06 decreased by 161,000 green tons, the equivalent of over 40,000
tons of raisins.
The order permits the industry to exercise supply control
provisions, which allow for the establishment of free and reserve
percentages, and establishment of a reserve pool. One of the primary
purposes of establishing free and reserve percentages is to equilibrate
supply and demand. If raisin markets are over-supplied with product,
producer prices will decline.
Raisins are generally marketed at relatively lower price levels in
the more elastic export market than in the more inelastic domestic
market. This results in a larger volume of raisins being marketed and
enhances producer returns. In addition, this system allows the U.S.
raisin industry to be more competitive in export markets.
The reserve percentage limits what handlers can market as free
tonnage. Data available as of July 31, 2007, showed that deliveries of
NS raisins were at 282,999 tons. The 10 percent reserve limited the
total free tonnage to 254,699 natural condition tons (.90 x the 282,999
ton crop). Adding the 254,699 ton figure with the carryin of 111,444
tons, plus the 62,121 tons of 10 plus 10 reserve raisins that were
released to handlers during the 2006-07 crop year (31,975 tons in
August 2006 and 30,146 tons in March 2007) made the total free supply
equal to 428,264 natural condition tons.
To assess the impact that volume regulation has on the prices
producers receive for their product, a price dependent econometric
model was estimated. This model is used to estimate producer prices
both with and without the use of volume regulation. The volume
regulation used by the raisin industry would result in decreased
shipments to primary markets. Without volume regulation the primary
market (domestic) could be over-supplied resulting in lower producer
prices and the build-up of unwanted inventories.
With volume regulation, producer prices are estimated to be
approximately $65 per ton higher than without volume regulation. This
price increase is beneficial to all producers regardless of size and
enhances producers' total revenues in comparison to no volume
regulation. Establishing a reserve allows the industry to help
stabilize supplies in both domestic and export markets, while improving
returns to producers.
Free and reserve percentages are established by varietal type, and
usually in years when the supply exceeds the trade demand by a large
enough margin that the Committee believes volume regulation is
necessary to maintain market stability. Accordingly, in assessing
whether to apply volume regulation or, as an alternative, not to apply
such regulation, it was determined that volume regulation was warranted
during the 2006-07 season for only one of the nine raisin varietal
types defined under the order.
The free and reserve percentages continue in effect the release of
the full trade demand and apply uniformly to all handlers in the
industry, regardless of size. For NS raisins, with the exception of the
1998-99 and 2004-05 crop years, small and large raisin producers and
handlers have been operating under volume regulation percentages every
year since 1983-84. There are no known additional costs incurred by
small handlers that are not incurred by large handlers. While the level
of benefits of this rulemaking is difficult to quantify, the
stabilizing effects of the volume regulations impact small and large
handlers positively by helping them maintain and expand markets even
though raisin supplies fluctuate widely from season to season.
Likewise, price stability positively impacts small and large producers
by allowing them to better anticipate the revenues their raisins will
generate.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
There are some reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance
requirements under the order. The reporting and recordkeeping burdens
are necessary for compliance purposes and for developing statistical
data for maintenance of the program. The requirements are the same as
those applied in past seasons. Thus, this action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large raisin
handlers. The forms require information which is readily available from
handler records and which can be provided without data processing
equipment or trained statistical staff. The information collection and
recordkeeping requirements have been previously approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control No. 0581-0178. As with
all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, as
noted in the initial regulatory analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the Committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout
the raisin industry and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meetings and participate in the Committee's deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the August 15, September 6, October 4, November 21,
2006, and the January 23, 2007, meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on
this issue.
Also, the Committee has a number of appointed subcommittees to
review certain issues and make recommendations to the Committee. The
Committee's Reserve Sales and Marketing Subcommittee met on August 15,
September 6, October 4, November 21, 2006, and January 23, 2007, and
discussed these issues in detail. Those meetings were also public
meetings and both large and small entities were able to participate and
express their views.
An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on April 9, 2007. Copies of the rule were mailed by
the Committee's staff to all Committee members and alternates and
raisin handlers. In addition, the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. That rule
provided for a 60-day comment period which ended June 8, 2007. One
comment was received during the comment period; it was not relevant to
the rulemaking action. Accordingly, no changes were made to the rule,
based on comment received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop
[[Page 59157]]
marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance guide
should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 17362, April 9, 2007) will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 989 which was
published at 72 FR 17362 on April 9, 2007, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: October 15, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-20621 Filed 10-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P