Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Establish an Information Collection, 59116 [07-5137]
Download as PDF
59116
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 201 / Thursday, October 18, 2007 / Notices
Preservation and Access Humanities
Collections and Resources, submitted to
the Division of Preservation and Access,
at the July 17, 2007 deadline.
8. Date: November 29, 2007.
Time: 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Room: 315.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Faculty Humanities
Workshops, submitted to the Division of
Education Programs, at the September
17, 2007 deadline.
Heather C. Gottry,
Acting Advisory Committee Management
Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–20546 Filed 10–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To
Establish an Information Collection
National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request clearance of this collection. In
accordance with the requirement of
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
we are providing opportunity for public
comment on this action. After obtaining
and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting
that OMB approve clearance of this
collection for no longer than three years.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by December 17, 2007
to be assured of consideration.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent practicable.
Comments: Comments are invited on
(a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:55 Oct 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
Officer, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilso Boulevard, Suite 295,
Arlingon, Virginia 22230; telephone
(703) 292–7556; or sent e-mail to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through
Friday. You may obtain a copy of the
data collection instrument and
instructions from Ms. Plimpton.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Descriptive and
Exploratory Study of the National
Science Foundation’s Small Grants for
Exploratory Research Funding
Mechanism.
OMB Number: 3145–New.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable.
Type of request: New.
Abstract: The SGER funding
mechanism was developed in 1989 by
an external committee, and authorized
by NSF Director Bloch for use beginning
at the start of Fiscal Year 1990. The
committee’s charge was to recommend
whether NSF as a whole should adopt
a mechanism similar to one that had
been piloted by the Engineering
Directorate, known as Small Grants for
Expedited Research. While that title
emphasized award timeliness, the
mechanism’s purposes included
funding innovative research ideas. The
current formulation of SGER remains
conceptually and administratively
similar to its original purposes and
practices. Over time, NSF has
broadened award parameters (award
ceiling and duration) and sharpened
definitions of purposes (e.g., inserting
the term Transformative Research). In at
least one case the SGER mechanism was
modified for a specific program purpose
(the Nanoscale Exploratory Grants,
which were externally reviewed).
All applicants will be asked about
topics relating to the application process
(how they found out about SGER, why
this mechanism and not a standard
proposal, etc.). Awardees will also be
asked about activities resulting from
their awards, such as follow-on
proposals, involvement of graduate
students, and testing of new
instrumentation. Declinees will be
asked, for example, what action they
took concerning the declined proposal
(wrote standard proposal to NSF or
another agency, and whether that was
awarded). All applicants will be asked
about the guidelines and funding and
mechanism, and how they can be
improved, e.g., through changes in their
design components, expected outcomes,
proposal review criteria, etc.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The survey data collection will be
done on the World Wide Web.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 30 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Government grant
holders—Individuals.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Form: 2500.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 400 hours (800
respondents at 30 minutes per
response).
Frequency of Response: Once.
Dated: October 12, 2007.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 07–5137 Filed 10–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Advisory Committee for Social,
Behavioral, and Economic Sciences;
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as
amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Advisory Committee for Social,
Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (#1171).
Date/Time: November 8, 2007; 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m.; November 9, 2007; 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Place: National Science Foundation, 4121
Wilson Blvd., Room 555, Stafford II
Arlington, VA 22230.
Type of Meeting: Open.
Contact Person: Mr. Tyrone Jordan, Office
of the Assistant Director, Directorate for
Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Room 905, Arlington, VA 22230,
703–292–8741.
Summary Minutes: May be obtained from
contact person listed above.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and
recommendations to the National Science
Foundation on major goals and policies
pertaining to Social, Behavioral and
Economic Sciences Directorate programs and
activities.
Agenda: Thursday, November 8, 2007.
• Programmatic Updates—Science of
Science and Innovation Policy, Science of
Learning Centers.
• Broadening Participation—Presentation
of NSF-wide Working Group, SBE Specific
Topics.
• Cyber-enabled Discovery and
Innovation.
• Emerging Areas in SBE—Complexity and
Systems Thinking Cyberinfrastructure,
Environment, Neuroscience, Learning.
Friday, November 9, 2007.
• Working Group on Impact of Proposal
Award & Management Mechanisms Briefing.
• Discussion with Deputy Director, NSF.
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 201 (Thursday, October 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 59116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5137]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Establish an Information
Collection
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to
request clearance of this collection. In accordance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), we are providing opportunity for public comment
on this action. After obtaining and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting that OMB approve clearance of
this collection for no longer than three years.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by December 17,
2007 to be assured of consideration. Comments received after that date
will be considered to the extent practicable.
Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilso Boulevard, Suite 295,
Arlingon, Virginia 22230; telephone (703) 292-7556; or sent e-mail to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through
Friday. You may obtain a copy of the data collection instrument and
instructions from Ms. Plimpton.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Descriptive and Exploratory Study of the
National Science Foundation's Small Grants for Exploratory Research
Funding Mechanism.
OMB Number: 3145-New.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not applicable.
Type of request: New.
Abstract: The SGER funding mechanism was developed in 1989 by an
external committee, and authorized by NSF Director Bloch for use
beginning at the start of Fiscal Year 1990. The committee's charge was
to recommend whether NSF as a whole should adopt a mechanism similar to
one that had been piloted by the Engineering Directorate, known as
Small Grants for Expedited Research. While that title emphasized award
timeliness, the mechanism's purposes included funding innovative
research ideas. The current formulation of SGER remains conceptually
and administratively similar to its original purposes and practices.
Over time, NSF has broadened award parameters (award ceiling and
duration) and sharpened definitions of purposes (e.g., inserting the
term Transformative Research). In at least one case the SGER mechanism
was modified for a specific program purpose (the Nanoscale Exploratory
Grants, which were externally reviewed).
All applicants will be asked about topics relating to the
application process (how they found out about SGER, why this mechanism
and not a standard proposal, etc.). Awardees will also be asked about
activities resulting from their awards, such as follow-on proposals,
involvement of graduate students, and testing of new instrumentation.
Declinees will be asked, for example, what action they took concerning
the declined proposal (wrote standard proposal to NSF or another
agency, and whether that was awarded). All applicants will be asked
about the guidelines and funding and mechanism, and how they can be
improved, e.g., through changes in their design components, expected
outcomes, proposal review criteria, etc.
The survey data collection will be done on the World Wide Web.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response.
Respondents: Government grant holders--Individuals.
Estimated Number of Responses per Form: 2500.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 400 hours (800
respondents at 30 minutes per response).
Frequency of Response: Once.
Dated: October 12, 2007.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 07-5137 Filed 10-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M