Public Access, Use, and Recreation Regulations for the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, 58982-58989 [E7-20423]
Download as PDF
58982
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 26
RIN 1018–AV43
Public Access, Use, and Recreation
Regulations for the Upper Mississippi
River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose new
regulations for the Upper Mississippi
River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
(refuge) to govern existing general
public use and recreation. If adopted,
these changes would take effect in
spring 2008 and would implement the
recently completed comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) for the refuge.
This proposed regulation would, if
made final, codify many existing refuge
regulations currently published in and
by brochures, signs, maps, and other
forms of public notice.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before December 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to Refuge Manager, Upper Mississippi
River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge,
51 East Fourth Street, Room 101,
Winona, MN 55987. See ‘‘Request for
Comments’’ under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for information on
electronic submission. You may also
request information on the refuge’s
public use programs and the conditions
that apply to them, or request copies of
compatibility determinations or other
information, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don
Hultman, (507) 452–4232; Fax (507)
452–0851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Upper
Mississippi River National Wildlife and
Fish Refuge (refuge) encompasses
240,000 acres in a more-or-less
continuous stretch of 261 miles of
Mississippi River floodplain in
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and
Illinois. Congress established the refuge
in 1924 to provide a ‘‘refuge and
breeding place’’ for migratory birds,
fish, other wildlife, and plants. The
refuge is perhaps the most important
corridor of habitat in the central United
States, due to its species diversity and
abundance, and it is the most visited
refuge in the United States, with 3.7
million annual visitors.
The development of an environmental
impact statement (EIS) and CCP for the
refuge began with a notice of intent to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
prepare the EIS, which we published in
the Federal Register on May 30, 2002
(67 FR 37852). We followed with a
notice of availability of our Draft EIS
(April 28, 2005; 70 FR 22085), and we
accepted public comments on the Draft
EIS for 120 days. On October 7, 2005,
we published a notice of intent to
prepare a Supplement to the Draft EIS
(70 FR 58738). We made the
Supplement to the Draft EIS available
on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72462), and
accepted public comments on that
document for 60 days, extended to 90
days (January 17, 2006, 71 FR 2561).
We offered public involvement
through 46 public meetings and
workshops attended by 4,500 persons in
14 different communities in 4 States
during the 4-year planning process. In
addition, we held or attended 80 other
meetings with the States, other agencies,
interest groups, and elected officials to
discuss the Draft EIS, and mailed three
different planning update newsletters to
up to 4,900 persons or organizations on
our planning mailing list. We also
issued numerous news releases at
various planning milestones, and held
two press conferences.
On July 11, 2006, we published a
notice of availability of our Final EIS (71
FR 39125), and we accepted public
comments on the Final EIS for 30 days.
On August 24, 2006, the Regional
Director of the Midwest Region of the
Fish and Wildlife Service signed the
Record of Decision that documented the
selection of Alternative E, the Preferred
Alternative presented in the Final EIS.
We published a notice of availability of
that Record of Decision on November 2,
2006 (71 FR 64553).
In accordance with the Record of
Decision, we prepared a CCP based on
Alternative E. The CCP was approved
on October 24, 2006. The National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration
Act of 1966 [16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee
(Administration Act), as amended by
the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement
Act)] requires the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) to manage each
refuge in a manner consistent with a
completed CCP. The Final EIS and CCP
are available at https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/planning/uppermiss.
In accordance with the recently
completed CCP, on June 28, 2007, we
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register (72 FR 35380)
identifying amendments to the refugespecific regulations for hunting and
sport fishing on the refuge and invited
30 days of public comment. We
published the final rule on September 7,
2007 (72 FR 51534).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
This recreation regulation proposal
implements the goals, objectives, and
strategies spelled out in the CCP
pertaining to wildlife observation,
photography, interpretation,
environmental recreation, and other
forms of recreation, access, and use such
as boating and camping.
The proposal also codifies current
refuge-specific regulations contained in
brochures and signs and on maps, finetunes the language of same for clarity
and ease of enforcement, and generally
modernizes the regulations for
consistency with the principles of
sound fish, wildlife, and recreation
management.
Proposed regulations stemming from
the CCP include the establishment of 4
new electric motor-only areas totaling
1,630 acres (1 such area of 222 acres
already exists) and 8 new seasonal slow,
no-wake areas totaling 9,370 acres. In
electric motor-only areas, watercraft
may only be powered by electric motors
or nonmotorized means. In slow, nowake areas from March 16 through
October 31, watercraft must travel at
slow, no-wake speed, and we prohibit
airboats and hovercraft. These areas
remain open to all forms of recreation,
including hunting and fishing, and only
the means of access changes to lessen
wildlife and habitat disturbance and
balance the needs of the estimated 3.7
million annual visitors to the refuge.
Collectively, these areas account for 8
percent of the water area of the refuge,
leaving 92 percent of the water area of
the refuge open to watercraft without
restriction.
Other regulations stemming from the
CCP include a ban of glass food and
beverage containers on beach areas and
other lands of the refuge; clarifying the
definition and requirements for camping
and campsite sanitation; clarifying rules
for fire and firewood use; and clarifying
rules for vehicles, firearms, and
domestic animals on the refuge.
The Administration Act authorizes
the Secretary to allow uses of refuge
areas, including wildlife-dependent and
other recreation, upon a determination
that such uses are compatible with the
purposes of the refuge and National
Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System)
mission. The action also must be in
accordance with provisions of all laws
applicable to the areas, developed in
coordination with the appropriate State
fish and wildlife agency(ies), and
consistent with the principles of sound
fish and wildlife management and
administration. These requirements
ensure that we maintain the biological
integrity, diversity, and environmental
health of the Refuge System for the
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
benefit of present and future generations
of Americans.
The Secretary is required to prepare a
CCP for each refuge and shall manage
each refuge consistent with the CCP.
Each CCP must identify and describe
the refuge purposes; fish, wildlife, and
plant populations; cultural resources;
areas for administrative or visitor
facilities; significant problems affecting
resources and actions necessary; and
opportunities for compatible wildlifedependent recreation. We must also
develop each CCP through consultation
with the other States, agencies, and the
public, and coordinate with applicable
State conservation plans.
Each CCP is guided by the
overarching requirement that we
manage refuges to fulfill the purposes
for which they were established and to
carry out the mission of the Refuge
System. In addition, the Improvement
Act requires that we administer the
Refuge System to provide for the
conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants
and their habitats, and to ensure their
biological integrity, diversity, and
environmental health.
We developed the CCP for the refuge
in accordance with all requirements and
in accordance with the consultation and
public involvement provisions of the
Improvement Act. This includes new
compatibility determinations for
interpretation, wildlife observation and
photography, environmental education,
beach-related uses, boating, camping,
and other allowed recreation. We
reference and list these compatibility
determinations in Appendix E of the
Final EIS. We then developed this
proposed rule to implement portions of
the CCP.
This document proposes to codify in
the Code of Federal Regulations public
use and recreation regulations that are
applicable to the Upper Mississippi
River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge.
We are proposing this to implement the
refuge CCP, better inform the general
public of the regulations at the refuge,
increase understanding and compliance
with these regulations, and make
enforcement of these regulations more
efficient. In addition to finding these
regulations in 50 CFR part 26, visitors
will find them reiterated in literature
distributed by the refuge and posted on
signs at major access points. Visitors
will also find the boundaries of closed
areas or other restricted-use areas
referenced in these regulations marked
by specific signs.
This proposal includes crossreferences to a number of existing
regulations in 50 CFR parts 26, 27, and
32 to assist visitors with understanding
safety and other legal requirements on
refuges. This redundancy is deliberate,
with the intention of improving safety
and compliance in our general public
use and recreation programs.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
Plain Language Mandate
In this proposed rule, we comply with
a Presidential mandate to use plain
language in regulations. As examples,
we use ‘‘you’’ to refer to the reader and
‘‘we’’ to refer to the Service, the word
‘‘allow’’ instead of ‘‘permit’’ when we
do not require the use of a permit for an
activity, and we use active voice
whenever possible (i.e., ‘‘We allow
camping on all lands and waters of the
refuge’’ rather than ‘‘Camping is allowed
on all lands and waters of the refuge’’).
Request for Comments
You may comment on this proposed
rule by any one of several methods:
1. You may comment via e-mail to:
uppermississippiriver@fws.gov. Please
include: ‘‘Attn: Recreation Regs.’’ and
your full name and return mailing
address in your e-mail message (see
‘‘Public Availability of Comments,’’
below). If you do not receive a
confirmation that we have received your
e-mail message, contact us directly at
(507) 452–4232.
2. You may mail or hand-deliver/
courier your comments to: Refuge
Manager, Upper Mississippi River
National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, 51
East Fourth Street, Room 101, Winona,
MN 55987.
3. You may fax comments to: Refuge
Manager, Upper Mississippi River
National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, at
(507) 452–0851.
4. You may submit comments online
at the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions at that site for submitting
comments.
Statutory Authority
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee, as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1977 and the
Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 (16
U.S.C. 460k–460k–4) (Recreation Act)
govern the administration and public
use of refuges.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
58983
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Comment
Department of the Interior policy is,
whenever practicable, to afford the
public a meaningful opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
During preparation of the refuge CCP,
we used an extensive public
information, outreach, and comment
process, including 46 public meetings or
workshops attended by 4,500 persons
and 80 other meetings with State
department of natural resources
agencies, other agencies, interest groups,
elected officials, and other Service and
Department of Interior offices. We
received and responded to a total of
3,230 written comments in the Final
EIS. This document, and its publication
as a proposed rule in the Federal
Register, will provide an additional
opportunity for comment during the 60day comment period.
We believe that a 60-day comment
period, through this broader publication
following the earlier public
involvement, gives the public sufficient
time to comment. In addition, in order
to continue to provide for previously
authorized recreation opportunities
while at the same time providing for
adequate resource and visitor
protection, we must be timely in
providing modifications to recreation
programs on refuges. We also need
adequate time to prepare brochures and
maps and to install signs to properly
inform the public of pending changes.
If adopted, we will incorporate these
proposed regulations into 50 CFR part
26.34 (Minnesota). Part 26 contains
general provisions, and part 26.34
contains refuge-specific regulations for
public use and recreation on refuges.
Clarity of This Rule
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 requires
each agency to write regulations that are
easy to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this
proposed rule easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as
the following: (1) Are the requirements
in the rule clearly stated? (2) Does the
rule contain technical language or
jargon that interferes with its clarity? (3)
Does the format of the rule (e.g.,
grouping and order of sections, use of
headings, paragraphing) aid or reduce
its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier
to understand if it were divided into
more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is the
description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
helpful to you in understanding the
rule? (6) What else could we do to make
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
58984
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the proposed rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments on how
we could make this proposed rule easier
to understand to: Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Department of the Interior,
Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20240. You may e-mail
your comments to: Execsec@ios.doi.gov.
Regulatory Planning and Review
In accordance with the criteria in E.O.
12866, we assert that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action. The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
makes the final determination under
E.O. 12866.
a. This proposed rule would not have
an annual economic effect of $100
million or adversely affect an economic
sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government. A cost-benefit and full
economic analysis is not required.
However, a brief assessment follows to
clarify the costs and benefits associated
with this proposed rule.
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to implement public use and recreation
regulations on the Upper Mississippi
River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
beginning with the spring 2008
recreation season. These regulations are
derived from and are consistent with the
CCP approved October 24, 2006. We
documented the environmental and
socioeconomic impacts of the CCP in
the Final EIS (available at https://
www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/
uppermiss).
Costs Incurred
Costs incurred by this proposed
regulation include sign-posting, leaflet
preparation and printing to provide
information to the public, law
enforcement, and monitoring. However,
these are regular and recurring functions
on the refuge with or without these
proposed regulations, and we can
handle these functions within normal
budget and staffing levels. Therefore, we
expect any costs to be minor in the short
term and negligible in the long term.
Benefits Accrued
These proposed regulations would
have several effects on wildlife
observation, recreational boating,
camping, and other beach-related uses
such as swimming, picnicking, and
sunbathing. These public uses account
for the most annual refuge visits (1.67
million) outside of hunting and fishing.
All of these uses will continue, although
in some areas the means of use will
change to balance the needs of a diverse
public who enjoys the refuge in various
ways, to safeguard visitors, and to
safeguard sensitive fish and wildlife
habitat.
We estimate that wildlife observation
visits will increase 20 percent over the
15-year life of the CCP due to overall
long-term trends in wildlife observation
visits, habitat improvements, access
improvements, and a marked increase in
wildlife observation-related facilities
outlined in the CCP. We predict these
regulations to have a corresponding
increase in positive economic impact as
reflected in Table 1 below.
Table 1 shows the expected change by
the end of the 15-year life of the CCP
resulting from the implementation of
the 2008 public use and recreation
regulations compared with FY 2003 for
the 19-county area on and adjacent to
the refuge. We expect annual wildlife
observation visitation to increase by 20
percent, resulting in 61,403 more
wildlife observation visits. Retail
expenditures associated with this
increased visitation total $812,658, with
total economic output (based on an
output multiplier of 1.23 for the 19county region impacted by the refuge) of
$993,723. An additional 14 jobs with
associated income of $214,297 would
occur, along with an additional
$104,531 in Federal and State tax
revenue.
TABLE 1.—ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF 2008 PUBLIC USE AND RECREATION REGULATIONS COMPARED WITH FY
2003 IMPACTS: WILDLIFE OBSERVATION VISITORS
[2003 dollars]
Impacts
FY 2003
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
Wildlife Observation Visitors ....................................................................................................................................
Expenditures ............................................................................................................................................................
Economic Output .....................................................................................................................................................
Jobs .........................................................................................................................................................................
Job Income ..............................................................................................................................................................
Federal and State Taxes .........................................................................................................................................
These proposed regulations would
have several effects on current boating
opportunities on the refuge.
Approximately 140,000 acres of water
would remain open to boating, but 1,852
acres of backwater areas would be
designated electric motor only and
another 9,370 acres would be designated
seasonal (March 16 through October 31)
slow, no-wake areas where boaters must
travel at slow, no-wake speed, and we
would prohibit airboats and hovercraft.
Collectively, these areas account for 8
percent of the water area of the refuge.
These areas remain open to all allowed
uses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
These proposed regulations would
have little effect on camping and other
beach-related use levels, since the areas
open would remain virtually
unchanged. These proposed regulations
could, however, improve the quality of
the experience by clarifying and finetuning existing regulations on camping,
boat mooring, reserving sites, length of
stay, campfires, sanitation, and other
aspects of the use which can cause
conflicts among visitors. Also, a
regulation banning the possession of
glass food and beverage containers on
beaches and other lands will improve
visitor safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
307,013
$4,063,292
$4,968,614
68
$1,071,484
$522,657
2008 regulations (change
from FY 2003
for 15-year
span of CCP)
+61,403
+$812,658
+$993,723
+14
+$214,297
+$104,531
We expect annual visits for boating,
camping, and beach-related activities to
remain about the same, although we
expect visits for silent watercraft
recreation (canoes and kayaks) to
increase an estimated 15 percent due to
the electric motor areas and slow, nowake areas. We predict the 2008
regulations to have a corresponding
modest positive change in economic
impact as reflected in Table 2.
Table 2 shows the expected change by
the end of the 15-year CCP lifespan
resulting from the implementation of
the 2008 public use and recreation
regulations compared with FY 2003 in
the 19-county area. We expect the
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
annual number of boating, camping, and
beach-related use visitors to increase by
2,044, with associated retail
expenditures of $52,010 and total
economic output of $63,400. We
associate these expenditures and output
58985
with 1 job and $213,567 in job-related
income. Federal and State tax revenue
would increase by $6,838.
TABLE 2.—ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF 2008 PUBLIC USE AND RECREATION REGULATIONS COMPARED WITH FY
2003 IMPACTS: RECREATIONAL BOATING, CAMPING AND OTHER BEACH-RELATED USE VISITORS
[2003 dollars]
Impacts
FY 2003
Boating, Camping, and other Beach Use Visitors ...................................................................................................
Expenditures ............................................................................................................................................................
Economic Output .....................................................................................................................................................
Jobs .........................................................................................................................................................................
Job Income ..............................................................................................................................................................
Federal and State Taxes .........................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
b. This proposed rule will not create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions. This action pertains solely to
the management of the Refuge System.
The wildlife observation, boating,
camping and other general recreation
activities located on the Upper
Mississippi River National Wildlife and
Fish Refuge account for less than 1
percent of the available supply in the
United States. Any small, incremental
change in the supply of recreational
opportunities will not measurably
impact any other agency’s existing
programs.
c. This proposed rule will not
materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights
and obligations of their recipients. This
proposed rule does not affect
entitlement programs. There are no
grants or other Federal assistance
programs associated with public use on
national wildlife refuges.
d. This proposed rule will not raise
novel legal or policy issues that were
not addressed in the Final EIS. This
proposed rule continues the practice of
allowing recreational public use of the
refuge. Many refuges in the Refuge
System currently have opportunities for
the public to engage in interpretation,
wildlife observation, and other wildlifedependent uses, and also allow
regulated boating, camping, and other
general recreation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
[SBREFA] of 1996) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
whenever a Federal agency is required
to publish a notice of rulemaking for
any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available for public
comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the
rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and
small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of an
agency certifies that the rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis
to be required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ‘‘significant impact’’ and a
threshold for a ‘‘substantial number of
small entities.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide a statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule does not decrease
the number of recreation types allowed
on the refuge but amends current
noncodified regulations on the refuge.
As a result, opportunities for wildlife
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
1,362,851
$34,673,216
$42,266,199
535
$9,044,582
$4,558,847
2008 regulations (change
from FY 2003
for 15-year
span of CCP)
+2,044
+$52,010
+$63,400
+1
+$213,567
+$6,838
observation, boating, camping, and
other general recreation on the refuge
will remain abundant and increase over
time.
Many small businesses within the
retail trade industry (such as hotels, gas
stations, outdoor sports shops, etc.) may
benefit from some increased refuge
visitation. A large percentage of these
retail trade establishments in the
majority of affected counties qualify as
small businesses (Table 3).
We expect that the incremental
recreational opportunities will be
scattered, and so we do not expect that
the rule will have a significant
economic effect (benefit) on a
substantial number of small entities in
any given community or county. Using
the estimate derived in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section, we expect
recreationists to spend an additional
$865,000 annually in total in the
refuges’ local economies. As shown in
Table 3, this represents less than 0.001
percent of the total amount of retail
expenditures in the 19-county area. For
comparison purposes, we show the
county with the smallest retail
expenditure total, Buffalo County in
Wisconsin. If the entire retail trade
expenditures associated with the 2008
public use and recreation regulations
occurred in Buffalo County, this would
amount to a 1.48 percent increase in
annual retail expenditures.
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
58986
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3.—COMPARATIVE EXPENDITURES FOR RETAIL TRADE ASSOCIATED WITH ADDITIONAL REFUGE VISITATION FROM
2008 PUBLIC USE AND RECREATION REGULATIONS
Retail trade in 2002
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
19 County Area ............................
Buffalo County, WI .......................
$9.8 billion
$58.3 million
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The proposed rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. We anticipate no
significant employment or small
business effects. This rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
By the end of the 15-year CCP lifespan,
the additional recreational opportunities
on the refuge would generate an
additional $865,000 in visitor
expenditures with an economic impact
estimated at $1.06 million per year
(2003 dollars). Consequently, the
maximum benefit of this rule for
businesses both small and large would
not be sufficient to make this a major
rule. The impact would be scattered
across 19 counties and would most
likely not be significant in any local
area.
b. Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State, or
local government agencies; or
geographic regions. We do not expect
this proposed rule to affect the supply
or demand for wildlife observation,
boating, camping, and other general
recreation opportunities in the United
States and, therefore, it should not affect
prices for related recreation equipment
and supplies, or the retailers that sell
equipment. Additional refuge recreation
opportunities would account for a
virtually undetectable percent of the
available opportunities in the United
States.
c. Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This proposed rule represents only a
small proportion of recreational
spending of a small number of affected
wildlife observers, boaters, campers and
other recreationists, approximately a
maximum of $1.06 million annually in
impact (economic output). Therefore,
this rule would have no measurable
economic effect on the wildlife-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
Change due to
2008 public use
and recreation
regulations
(15-year span of
CCP)
Change as percent
of total retail trade
Total number of retail establishments
Establishments with
fewer than 10
employees
0.0097
1.48
24,878
350
17,957
290
$864,668
$864,668
dependent, boating, and camping
industries, which have annual sales of
equipment and travel expenditures of
over $120 billion nationwide in 2006.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Since this proposed rule would apply
to public use of federally owned and
managed refuges, it would not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule would not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this
proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications. This
regulation would affect only visitors to
the refuge and describe what they can
do while they are on the refuge.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
As discussed in the Regulatory
Planning and Review and Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act sections above,
this proposed rule would not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment under E.O. 13132. In
preparing the CCP for the refuge, we
worked closely with the four States
bordering the refuge, and this proposed
rule reflects the CCP.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Office of the Solicitor has determined
that the proposed rule would not
unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
This proposal would clarify and codify
established regulations and result in
better understanding of the regulations
by refuge visitors.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
(E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
E.O. 13211 on regulations that
significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. E.O. 13211
requires agencies to prepare Statements
of Energy Effects when undertaking
certain actions. Because this proposed
rule is a modification of existing public
use and recreation programs on the
refuge, it is not a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866, and we do not
expect it to significantly affect energy
supplies, distribution, and use.
Therefore, this action is a not a
significant energy action and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated possible effects on
federally recognized Indian tribes and
have determined that there are no
effects. We coordinate recreational use
on national wildlife refuges with Tribal
governments having adjoining or
overlapping jurisdiction before we
propose changes to the regulations.
During scoping and preparation of the
Final EIS, we contacted 35 Indian tribes
to inform them of the process and seek
their comments.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not contain any
information collection requirements
other than those already approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (OMB Control
Number is 1018–0102). See 50 CFR
25.23 for information concerning that
approval. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Endangered Species Act Section 7
Consultation
During preparation of the Final EIS,
we completed a section 7 consultation
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
and determined that the preferred
alternative, which included public use
and recreation changes reflected in this
proposed rule, is not likely to adversely
affect individuals of listed or candidate
species or designated critical habitat of
such species. The Service’s Ecological
Services Office concurred with this
determination. Listed species on the
refuge are the Higgins eye pearly mussel
and candidate species are the Eastern
massasauga and spectaclecase and
sheepnose mussels. A copy of the
section 7 evaluation and accompanying
biological assessment is available from
the refuge at the location listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
Primary Author
National Environmental Policy Act
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k,
664, 668dd–668ee, and 715i; Pub. L. 96–315
(94 Stat. 958) and Pub. L. 98–146 (97 Stat.
955).
Concerning the actions that are the
subject of this proposed rulemaking, we
have complied with NEPA through the
preparation of a Final EIS and Record of
Decision which include the major
public use and recreation changes
reflected in this proposed rule. The
NEPA documents are available on our
Web site at https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/planning/uppermiss.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
Available Information for Specific
Districts of the Refuge
The refuge is divided into four
districts for management,
administrative, and public service
effectiveness and efficiency. These
districts correspond to two or more
Mississippi River navigation pools
created by the series of locks and dams
on the river. District offices are located
in Winona, Minnesota (Pools 4–6); La
Crosse, Wisconsin (Pools 7–8);
McGregor, Iowa (Pools 9–11); and
Savanna, Illinois (Pools 12–14). If you
are interested in specific information
pertaining to a particular electric motor
area; slow, no-wake area; or other
feature discussed in this proposed rule,
you may contact the appropriate district
office listed below:
Winona District, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 51 East Fourth Street,
Room 203, Winona, MN 55987;
Telephone (507) 454–7351.
La Crosse District, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 555 Lester Avenue,
Onalaska, WI 54650; Telephone (608)
783–8405.
McGregor District, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 460,
McGregor, IA 52157; Telephone (563)
873–3423.
Savanna District, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 7071 Riverview Road,
Thomson, IL 61285; Telephone (815)
273–2732.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
Don Hultman, Refuge Manager, Upper
Mississippi River National Wildlife and
Fish Refuge, is the primary author of
this rulemaking document.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 26
Recreation and recreation areas,
Wildlife refuges.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 50,
Chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 26—[AMENDED]
1. Revise the authority citation for
part 26 to read as follows:
2. Revise the heading, add an
introductory paragraph, and
alphabetically add listings for the States
of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, and
Wisconsin to § 26.34 to read as follows:
§ 26.34 What are the special regulations
concerning public access, use and
recreation for individual national wildlife
refuges?
The following refuge units, listed in
alphabetical order by State and unit
name, have refuge-specific regulations
for public access, use, and recreation.
Illinois
Upper Mississippi River National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Refer to § 26.34 Minnesota for
regulations.
Iowa
Upper Mississippi River National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Refer to § 26.34 Minnesota for
regulations.
Minnesota
Upper Mississippi River National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge
(a) Wildlife Observation, Photography,
Interpretation, Environmental
Education, and Other General
Recreational Uses. We allow wildlifedependent uses and other recreational
uses such as, but not limited to,
sightseeing, hiking, bicycling on roads
or trails, picnicking, and swimming, on
areas designated by the refuge manager
and shown on maps available at refuge
offices, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) In areas posted and shown on
maps as ‘‘No Entry—Sanctuary,’’ we
prohibit entry as specified on signs or
maps (see § 32.42 of this chapter for list
of areas and locations).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
58987
(2) In areas posted and shown on
maps as ‘‘Area Closed,’’ ‘‘Area Closed—
No Motors,’’ and ‘‘No Hunting Zone’’
(Goose Island), we ask that you practice
voluntary avoidance of these areas by
any means or for any purpose from
October 15 to the end of the respective
State duck hunting season. In areas
marked ‘‘no motors,’’ we prohibit the
use of motors on watercraft from
October 15 to the end of the respective
State duck hunting season (see § 32.42
of this chapter for list of areas and
locations).
(3) Commercial tours and filming
require a permit issued by the refuge or
district manager (see § 27.51 of this
chapter).
(4) We allow the collecting of edible
fruits, nuts, mushrooms, or other plant
parts for personal use (no sale or barter
allowed). We limit the amount you may
collect to 2 gallons by volume per
person, per day (see § 27.51 of this
chapter).
(5) We prohibit the harvest of wild
rice; plant and animal specimens; and
other natural objects, including shed
deer antlers, rocks, stones, or minerals.
We only allow the collection of plants
or their parts for ornamental use by
permit issued by the refuge or district
manager (see § 27.51 of this chapter).
(6) We prohibit the cutting, removal,
or damage of any tree or vegetation, or
the possession of a chainsaw on the
refuge, without a permit from the refuge
or district manager. We prohibit
attaching nails, screws, or other
hardware to any tree (see § 27.51 and
§ 32.42 of this chapter).
(7) We prohibit all vehicle use on or
across refuge lands at any time except
on designated routes of travel or on the
ice over navigable waters accessed from
boat landings. We prohibit parking
beyond vehicle control barriers or on
grass or other vegetation. We prohibit
parking or operating vehicles in a
manner that obstructs or impedes any
road, trail, fire lane, boat ramp, access
gate, or other facility, or in a manner
that creates a safety hazard or endangers
any person, property, or environmental
feature. We may impound any vehicle
left parked in violation at the owner’s
expense (see § 27.31(h) of this chapter).
(8) We allow dogs and other domestic
animals on the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) We prohibit dogs disturbing or
endangering wildlife or people while on
the refuge.
(ii) While on the refuge, all dogs must
be under the control of their owners/
handlers at all times or on a leash.
(iii) We prohibit allowing dogs to
roam.
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
58988
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(iv) All dogs must be on a leash when
on hiking trails, or other areas so posted.
(v) We allow working a dog in refuge
waters by tossing a retrieval dummy or
other object for out-and-back exercise.
(vi) We encourage the use of dogs for
hunting (see § 32.42 of this chapter), but
we prohibit field trials and commercial/
professional dog training.
(vii) Owners/handlers of dogs are
responsible for disposal of dog
droppings in refuge public use
concentration areas such as trails,
sandbars, and boat landings.
(viii) We prohibit horses and all other
domestic animals on the refuge unless
confined in a vehicle, boat, trailer,
kennel or other container (see § 26.21 of
this chapter).
(9) We prohibit the carrying,
possessing, or discharging of firearms
(including dog training pistols and
dummy launchers), air guns, or any
other weapons on the refuge, unless you
are a licensed hunter or trapper engaged
in authorized activities during
established seasons, in accordance with
Federal, State, and local regulations. We
prohibit target practice on the refuge
(see §§ 27.42 and 27.43 of this chapter).
(10) We prohibit the use or possession
of glass food and beverage containers on
lands within the refuge.
(11) We require that you keep all
refuge lands clean during your period of
use or occupancy. At all times you must
keep all refuse, trash, and litter
contained in bags or other suitable
containers and not left scattered on the
ground or in the water. You must
remove all personal property, refuse,
trash, and litter immediately upon
vacating a site. We require that human
solid waste and associated material be
either removed and properly disposed
of off-refuge or be buried on site to a
depth of 6–8 inches (15–20 cm) and at
least 50 feet (15 m) from water’s edge
(see § 27.94 of this chapter).
(b) Watercraft Use. We allow the use
of watercraft of all types and means of
propulsion on all navigable waters of
the refuge in accordance with State
regulations subject to the following
conditions:
(1) In areas posted and shown on
maps as ‘‘Electric Motor Area,’’ we
prohibit motorized vehicles and
watercraft year-round except watercraft
powered by electric motors or
nonmotorized means. We do not
prohibit the possession of other
watercraft motors in these areas, only
their use. These areas are named and
located as follows:
(i) Island 42, Pool 5, Minnesota, 459
acres.
(ii) Snyder Lake, Pool 5A, Minnesota,
182 acres.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
(iii) Mertes Slough, Pool 6, Wisconsin,
222 acres.
(iv) Browns Marsh, Pool 7, Wisconsin,
827 acres.
(v) Hoosier Lake, Pool 10, Wisconsin,
162 acres.
(2) In areas posted and shown on
maps as ‘‘Slow No Wake Area,’’ we
require watercraft to travel at slow, nowake speed from March 16 through
October 31. We apply the applicable
State definition of slow, no-wake
operation in these areas. We also
prohibit the operation of airboats or
hovercraft in these areas from March 16
through October 31. These areas are
named and located as follows:
(i) Nelson-Trevino, Pool 4, Wisconsin,
2,626 acres (takes effect March 16,
2009).
(ii) Denzers Slough, Pool 5A,
Minnesota, 83 acres.
(iii) Black River Bottoms, Pool 7,
Wisconsin, 815 acres.
(iv) Blue/Target Lake, Pool 8,
Minnesota, 1,834 acres.
(v) Root River, Pool 8, Minnesota, 695
acres.
(vi) Reno Bottoms, Pool 9, Minnesota,
2,536 acres.
(vii) Nine Mile Island, Pool 12, Iowa,
454 acres.
(viii) Princeton, Pool 14, Iowa, 327
acres.
(3) In water access and travel routes
posted and shown on maps as ‘‘Slow No
Wake Zone,’’ we require watercraft to
travel at slow, no-wake speed at all
times unless otherwise posted. We
apply the respective State definition of
slow, no-wake operation in these areas.
(4) In portions of Spring Lake and
Crooked Slough—Lost Mound, Pool 13,
Illinois, posted as ‘‘Slow, 5 mph When
Boats Present’’ and marked on maps as
‘‘Speed/Distance Regulation,’’ we
require watercraft operators to reduce
the speed of their watercraft to less than
5 mph (8 kph) when within 100 feet (30
m) of another watercraft that is
anchored or underway at 5 mph (8 kph)
or less.
(5) We prohibit the mooring,
beaching, or storing of watercraft on the
refuge without being used at least once
every 24 hours. We define ‘‘being used’’
as a watercraft moved at least 100 feet
(30 m) on the water with operator on
board. We prohibit the mooring of
watercraft within 200 feet (60 m) of
refuge boat landings or ramps. We may
impound any watercraft moored in
violation at the owner’s expense (see
§ 27.32 of this chapter).
(6) Conditions A1, A2, and A11 apply.
(c) Camping. We allow camping on all
lands and waters of the refuge as
designated by the refuge manager and
shown on maps available at refuge
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
offices subject to the following
conditions:
(1) We define camping as erecting a
tent or shelter of natural or synthetic
material, preparing a sleeping bag or
other bedding material for use, parking
of a motor vehicle or mooring or
anchoring of a vessel, for the apparent
purpose of overnight occupancy, or,
occupying or leaving personal property,
including boats or other craft, at a site
anytime between the hours of 11 p.m.
and 3 a.m.
(2) We prohibit camping at any one
site for a period longer than 14 days
during any 30-consecutive-day period.
After 14 days, you must move all
persons, property, equipment, and boats
to a new site located at least .5 mile (.8
km) from the previous site.
(3) We prohibit camping within 100
feet (30 meters) of any refuge boat
landing, access area, parking lot,
structure, road, trail, or other recreation
or management facility.
(4) We prohibit camping during
waterfowl hunting seasons within areas
posted ‘‘No Entry—Sanctuary,’’ ‘‘Area
Closed,’’ ‘‘Area Closed—No Motors,’’
and ‘‘No Hunting Zone’’ or on any sites
not clearly visible from the main
commercial navigation channel of the
Mississippi River (see § 32.42 of this
chapter).
(5) You must occupy campsites daily.
We prohibit the leaving of tents,
camping equipment, or other property
unattended at any site for over 24 hours,
and we may impound any equipment
left in violation at the owner’s expense.
We define occupy and attended as being
present at a site for a minimum of 2
hours daily.
(6) You must remove any tables,
fireplaces, or other facilities erected
upon vacating a camping or day-use
site.
(7) We allow campfires in conjunction
with camping and day-use activities
subject to the following conditions (see
§ 27.95 and § 32.42 of this chapter):
(i) You may only use dead wood on
the ground, or materials brought into the
refuge such as charcoal or firewood.
You must remove any unused firewood
brought into the refuge upon departure
due to the threat of invasive insects.
(ii) We prohibit building, attending,
and maintaining a campfire without
sufficient clearance from flammable
materials so as to prevent its escape.
(iii) We prohibit building a fire at any
developed facility including, but not
limited to, boat landings, access areas,
parking lots, roads, trails or any other
recreation or management facility or
structure.
(iv) We prohibit burying live fires or
hot coals.
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS3
(v) We prohibit burning or attempting
to burn any nonflammable materials or
any materials that may produce toxic
fumes or leave hazardous waste. These
materials include, but are not limited to,
metal cans, plastic containers, glass,
fiberglass, treated wood products, wood
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:14 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
containing nails or staples, wire,
floatation materials, or other refuse.
(8) Conditions A4 through A11 apply.
*
*
*
*
*
Wisconsin
Upper Mississippi River National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
58989
Refer to § 26.34 Minnesota for
regulations.
Dated: October 5, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–20423 Filed 10–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\17OCP3.SGM
17OCP3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 17, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58982-58989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20423]
[[Page 58981]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part V
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 26
Public Access, Use, and Recreation Regulations for the Upper
Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 58982]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 26
RIN 1018-AV43
Public Access, Use, and Recreation Regulations for the Upper
Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose new
regulations for the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish
Refuge (refuge) to govern existing general public use and recreation.
If adopted, these changes would take effect in spring 2008 and would
implement the recently completed comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)
for the refuge. This proposed regulation would, if made final, codify
many existing refuge regulations currently published in and by
brochures, signs, maps, and other forms of public notice.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before December 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Refuge Manager, Upper Mississippi
River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, 51 East Fourth Street, Room
101, Winona, MN 55987. See ``Request for Comments'' under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for information on electronic submission. You may also
request information on the refuge's public use programs and the
conditions that apply to them, or request copies of compatibility
determinations or other information, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Hultman, (507) 452-4232; Fax (507)
452-0851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Upper Mississippi River National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge (refuge) encompasses 240,000 acres in a more-
or-less continuous stretch of 261 miles of Mississippi River floodplain
in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Illinois. Congress established the
refuge in 1924 to provide a ``refuge and breeding place'' for migratory
birds, fish, other wildlife, and plants. The refuge is perhaps the most
important corridor of habitat in the central United States, due to its
species diversity and abundance, and it is the most visited refuge in
the United States, with 3.7 million annual visitors.
The development of an environmental impact statement (EIS) and CCP
for the refuge began with a notice of intent to prepare the EIS, which
we published in the Federal Register on May 30, 2002 (67 FR 37852). We
followed with a notice of availability of our Draft EIS (April 28,
2005; 70 FR 22085), and we accepted public comments on the Draft EIS
for 120 days. On October 7, 2005, we published a notice of intent to
prepare a Supplement to the Draft EIS (70 FR 58738). We made the
Supplement to the Draft EIS available on December 5, 2005 (70 FR
72462), and accepted public comments on that document for 60 days,
extended to 90 days (January 17, 2006, 71 FR 2561).
We offered public involvement through 46 public meetings and
workshops attended by 4,500 persons in 14 different communities in 4
States during the 4-year planning process. In addition, we held or
attended 80 other meetings with the States, other agencies, interest
groups, and elected officials to discuss the Draft EIS, and mailed
three different planning update newsletters to up to 4,900 persons or
organizations on our planning mailing list. We also issued numerous
news releases at various planning milestones, and held two press
conferences.
On July 11, 2006, we published a notice of availability of our
Final EIS (71 FR 39125), and we accepted public comments on the Final
EIS for 30 days. On August 24, 2006, the Regional Director of the
Midwest Region of the Fish and Wildlife Service signed the Record of
Decision that documented the selection of Alternative E, the Preferred
Alternative presented in the Final EIS. We published a notice of
availability of that Record of Decision on November 2, 2006 (71 FR
64553).
In accordance with the Record of Decision, we prepared a CCP based
on Alternative E. The CCP was approved on October 24, 2006. The
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 [16 U.S.C.
668dd-668ee (Administration Act), as amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act)] requires the
Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to manage each refuge in a manner
consistent with a completed CCP. The Final EIS and CCP are available at
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/uppermiss.
In accordance with the recently completed CCP, on June 28, 2007, we
published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (72 FR 35380)
identifying amendments to the refuge-specific regulations for hunting
and sport fishing on the refuge and invited 30 days of public comment.
We published the final rule on September 7, 2007 (72 FR 51534).
This recreation regulation proposal implements the goals,
objectives, and strategies spelled out in the CCP pertaining to
wildlife observation, photography, interpretation, environmental
recreation, and other forms of recreation, access, and use such as
boating and camping.
The proposal also codifies current refuge-specific regulations
contained in brochures and signs and on maps, fine-tunes the language
of same for clarity and ease of enforcement, and generally modernizes
the regulations for consistency with the principles of sound fish,
wildlife, and recreation management.
Proposed regulations stemming from the CCP include the
establishment of 4 new electric motor-only areas totaling 1,630 acres
(1 such area of 222 acres already exists) and 8 new seasonal slow, no-
wake areas totaling 9,370 acres. In electric motor-only areas,
watercraft may only be powered by electric motors or nonmotorized
means. In slow, no-wake areas from March 16 through October 31,
watercraft must travel at slow, no-wake speed, and we prohibit airboats
and hovercraft. These areas remain open to all forms of recreation,
including hunting and fishing, and only the means of access changes to
lessen wildlife and habitat disturbance and balance the needs of the
estimated 3.7 million annual visitors to the refuge. Collectively,
these areas account for 8 percent of the water area of the refuge,
leaving 92 percent of the water area of the refuge open to watercraft
without restriction.
Other regulations stemming from the CCP include a ban of glass food
and beverage containers on beach areas and other lands of the refuge;
clarifying the definition and requirements for camping and campsite
sanitation; clarifying rules for fire and firewood use; and clarifying
rules for vehicles, firearms, and domestic animals on the refuge.
The Administration Act authorizes the Secretary to allow uses of
refuge areas, including wildlife-dependent and other recreation, upon a
determination that such uses are compatible with the purposes of the
refuge and National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) mission. The
action also must be in accordance with provisions of all laws
applicable to the areas, developed in coordination with the appropriate
State fish and wildlife agency(ies), and consistent with the principles
of sound fish and wildlife management and administration. These
requirements ensure that we maintain the biological integrity,
diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System for the
[[Page 58983]]
benefit of present and future generations of Americans.
The Secretary is required to prepare a CCP for each refuge and
shall manage each refuge consistent with the CCP. Each CCP must
identify and describe the refuge purposes; fish, wildlife, and plant
populations; cultural resources; areas for administrative or visitor
facilities; significant problems affecting resources and actions
necessary; and opportunities for compatible wildlife-dependent
recreation. We must also develop each CCP through consultation with the
other States, agencies, and the public, and coordinate with applicable
State conservation plans.
Each CCP is guided by the overarching requirement that we manage
refuges to fulfill the purposes for which they were established and to
carry out the mission of the Refuge System. In addition, the
Improvement Act requires that we administer the Refuge System to
provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants and their
habitats, and to ensure their biological integrity, diversity, and
environmental health.
We developed the CCP for the refuge in accordance with all
requirements and in accordance with the consultation and public
involvement provisions of the Improvement Act. This includes new
compatibility determinations for interpretation, wildlife observation
and photography, environmental education, beach-related uses, boating,
camping, and other allowed recreation. We reference and list these
compatibility determinations in Appendix E of the Final EIS. We then
developed this proposed rule to implement portions of the CCP.
Plain Language Mandate
In this proposed rule, we comply with a Presidential mandate to use
plain language in regulations. As examples, we use ``you'' to refer to
the reader and ``we'' to refer to the Service, the word ``allow''
instead of ``permit'' when we do not require the use of a permit for an
activity, and we use active voice whenever possible (i.e., ``We allow
camping on all lands and waters of the refuge'' rather than ``Camping
is allowed on all lands and waters of the refuge'').
Statutory Authority
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1977 and the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 (16
U.S.C. 460k-460k-4) (Recreation Act) govern the administration and
public use of refuges.
This document proposes to codify in the Code of Federal Regulations
public use and recreation regulations that are applicable to the Upper
Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge. We are proposing
this to implement the refuge CCP, better inform the general public of
the regulations at the refuge, increase understanding and compliance
with these regulations, and make enforcement of these regulations more
efficient. In addition to finding these regulations in 50 CFR part 26,
visitors will find them reiterated in literature distributed by the
refuge and posted on signs at major access points. Visitors will also
find the boundaries of closed areas or other restricted-use areas
referenced in these regulations marked by specific signs.
This proposal includes cross-references to a number of existing
regulations in 50 CFR parts 26, 27, and 32 to assist visitors with
understanding safety and other legal requirements on refuges. This
redundancy is deliberate, with the intention of improving safety and
compliance in our general public use and recreation programs.
Request for Comments
You may comment on this proposed rule by any one of several
methods:
1. You may comment via e-mail to: uppermississippiriver@fws.gov.
Please include: ``Attn: Recreation Regs.'' and your full name and
return mailing address in your e-mail message (see ``Public
Availability of Comments,'' below). If you do not receive a
confirmation that we have received your e-mail message, contact us
directly at (507) 452-4232.
2. You may mail or hand-deliver/courier your comments to: Refuge
Manager, Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, 51
East Fourth Street, Room 101, Winona, MN 55987.
3. You may fax comments to: Refuge Manager, Upper Mississippi River
National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, at (507) 452-0851.
4. You may submit comments online at the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Comment
Department of the Interior policy is, whenever practicable, to
afford the public a meaningful opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. During preparation of the refuge CCP, we used an
extensive public information, outreach, and comment process, including
46 public meetings or workshops attended by 4,500 persons and 80 other
meetings with State department of natural resources agencies, other
agencies, interest groups, elected officials, and other Service and
Department of Interior offices. We received and responded to a total of
3,230 written comments in the Final EIS. This document, and its
publication as a proposed rule in the Federal Register, will provide an
additional opportunity for comment during the 60-day comment period.
We believe that a 60-day comment period, through this broader
publication following the earlier public involvement, gives the public
sufficient time to comment. In addition, in order to continue to
provide for previously authorized recreation opportunities while at the
same time providing for adequate resource and visitor protection, we
must be timely in providing modifications to recreation programs on
refuges. We also need adequate time to prepare brochures and maps and
to install signs to properly inform the public of pending changes.
If adopted, we will incorporate these proposed regulations into 50
CFR part 26.34 (Minnesota). Part 26 contains general provisions, and
part 26.34 contains refuge-specific regulations for public use and
recreation on refuges.
Clarity of This Rule
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 requires each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand. We invite your comments on how
to make this proposed rule easier to understand, including answers to
questions such as the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated? (2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon
that interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule
(e.g., grouping and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing)
aid or reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand
if it were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is the
description of the rule in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
helpful to you in understanding the rule? (6) What else could we do to
make
[[Page 58984]]
the proposed rule easier to understand? Send a copy of any comments on
how we could make this proposed rule easier to understand to: Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may e-mail your comments to:
Execsec@ios.doi.gov.
Regulatory Planning and Review
In accordance with the criteria in E.O. 12866, we assert that this
rule is not a significant regulatory action. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) makes the final determination under E.O. 12866.
a. This proposed rule would not have an annual economic effect of
$100 million or adversely affect an economic sector, productivity,
jobs, the environment, or other units of the government. A cost-benefit
and full economic analysis is not required. However, a brief assessment
follows to clarify the costs and benefits associated with this proposed
rule.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to implement public use and
recreation regulations on the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife
and Fish Refuge beginning with the spring 2008 recreation season. These
regulations are derived from and are consistent with the CCP approved
October 24, 2006. We documented the environmental and socioeconomic
impacts of the CCP in the Final EIS (available at https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/planning/uppermiss).
Costs Incurred
Costs incurred by this proposed regulation include sign-posting,
leaflet preparation and printing to provide information to the public,
law enforcement, and monitoring. However, these are regular and
recurring functions on the refuge with or without these proposed
regulations, and we can handle these functions within normal budget and
staffing levels. Therefore, we expect any costs to be minor in the
short term and negligible in the long term.
Benefits Accrued
These proposed regulations would have several effects on wildlife
observation, recreational boating, camping, and other beach-related
uses such as swimming, picnicking, and sunbathing. These public uses
account for the most annual refuge visits (1.67 million) outside of
hunting and fishing. All of these uses will continue, although in some
areas the means of use will change to balance the needs of a diverse
public who enjoys the refuge in various ways, to safeguard visitors,
and to safeguard sensitive fish and wildlife habitat.
We estimate that wildlife observation visits will increase 20
percent over the 15-year life of the CCP due to overall long-term
trends in wildlife observation visits, habitat improvements, access
improvements, and a marked increase in wildlife observation-related
facilities outlined in the CCP. We predict these regulations to have a
corresponding increase in positive economic impact as reflected in
Table 1 below.
Table 1 shows the expected change by the end of the 15-year life of
the CCP resulting from the implementation of the 2008 public use and
recreation regulations compared with FY 2003 for the 19-county area on
and adjacent to the refuge. We expect annual wildlife observation
visitation to increase by 20 percent, resulting in 61,403 more wildlife
observation visits. Retail expenditures associated with this increased
visitation total $812,658, with total economic output (based on an
output multiplier of 1.23 for the 19-county region impacted by the
refuge) of $993,723. An additional 14 jobs with associated income of
$214,297 would occur, along with an additional $104,531 in Federal and
State tax revenue.
Table 1.--Annual Economic Impacts of 2008 Public Use and Recreation
Regulations Compared With FY 2003 Impacts: Wildlife Observation Visitors
[2003 dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008
regulations
(change from
Impacts FY 2003 FY 2003 for 15-
year span of
CCP)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wildlife Observation Visitors........... 307,013 +61,403
Expenditures............................ $4,063,292 +$812,658
Economic Output......................... $4,968,614 +$993,723
Jobs.................................... 68 +14
Job Income.............................. $1,071,484 +$214,297
Federal and State Taxes................. $522,657 +$104,531
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed regulations would have several effects on current
boating opportunities on the refuge. Approximately 140,000 acres of
water would remain open to boating, but 1,852 acres of backwater areas
would be designated electric motor only and another 9,370 acres would
be designated seasonal (March 16 through October 31) slow, no-wake
areas where boaters must travel at slow, no-wake speed, and we would
prohibit airboats and hovercraft. Collectively, these areas account for
8 percent of the water area of the refuge. These areas remain open to
all allowed uses.
These proposed regulations would have little effect on camping and
other beach-related use levels, since the areas open would remain
virtually unchanged. These proposed regulations could, however, improve
the quality of the experience by clarifying and fine-tuning existing
regulations on camping, boat mooring, reserving sites, length of stay,
campfires, sanitation, and other aspects of the use which can cause
conflicts among visitors. Also, a regulation banning the possession of
glass food and beverage containers on beaches and other lands will
improve visitor safety.
We expect annual visits for boating, camping, and beach-related
activities to remain about the same, although we expect visits for
silent watercraft recreation (canoes and kayaks) to increase an
estimated 15 percent due to the electric motor areas and slow, no-wake
areas. We predict the 2008 regulations to have a corresponding modest
positive change in economic impact as reflected in Table 2.
Table 2 shows the expected change by the end of the 15-year CCP
lifespan resulting from the implementation of the 2008 public use and
recreation regulations compared with FY 2003 in the 19-county area. We
expect the
[[Page 58985]]
annual number of boating, camping, and beach-related use visitors to
increase by 2,044, with associated retail expenditures of $52,010 and
total economic output of $63,400. We associate these expenditures and
output with 1 job and $213,567 in job-related income. Federal and State
tax revenue would increase by $6,838.
Table 2.--Annual Economic Impacts of 2008 Public Use and Recreation
Regulations Compared With FY 2003 Impacts: Recreational Boating, Camping
and Other Beach-related Use Visitors
[2003 dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008
regulations
(change from
Impacts FY 2003 FY 2003 for 15-
year span of
CCP)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boating, Camping, and other Beach Use 1,362,851 +2,044
Visitors...............................
Expenditures............................ $34,673,216 +$52,010
Economic Output......................... $42,266,199 +$63,400
Jobs.................................... 535 +1
Job Income.............................. $9,044,582 +$213,567
Federal and State Taxes................. $4,558,847 +$6,838
------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. This proposed rule will not create inconsistencies with other
agencies' actions. This action pertains solely to the management of the
Refuge System. The wildlife observation, boating, camping and other
general recreation activities located on the Upper Mississippi River
National Wildlife and Fish Refuge account for less than 1 percent of
the available supply in the United States. Any small, incremental
change in the supply of recreational opportunities will not measurably
impact any other agency's existing programs.
c. This proposed rule will not materially affect entitlements,
grants, user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
their recipients. This proposed rule does not affect entitlement
programs. There are no grants or other Federal assistance programs
associated with public use on national wildlife refuges.
d. This proposed rule will not raise novel legal or policy issues
that were not addressed in the Final EIS. This proposed rule continues
the practice of allowing recreational public use of the refuge. Many
refuges in the Refuge System currently have opportunities for the
public to engage in interpretation, wildlife observation, and other
wildlife-dependent uses, and also allow regulated boating, camping, and
other general recreation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act [SBREFA] of 1996) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a
notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare
and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of
an agency certifies that the rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a
regulatory flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ``significant impact'' and a threshold for a
``substantial number of small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA
amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to
provide a statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This proposed rule does not decrease the number of recreation types
allowed on the refuge but amends current noncodified regulations on the
refuge. As a result, opportunities for wildlife observation, boating,
camping, and other general recreation on the refuge will remain
abundant and increase over time.
Many small businesses within the retail trade industry (such as
hotels, gas stations, outdoor sports shops, etc.) may benefit from some
increased refuge visitation. A large percentage of these retail trade
establishments in the majority of affected counties qualify as small
businesses (Table 3).
We expect that the incremental recreational opportunities will be
scattered, and so we do not expect that the rule will have a
significant economic effect (benefit) on a substantial number of small
entities in any given community or county. Using the estimate derived
in the Regulatory Planning and Review section, we expect recreationists
to spend an additional $865,000 annually in total in the refuges' local
economies. As shown in Table 3, this represents less than 0.001 percent
of the total amount of retail expenditures in the 19-county area. For
comparison purposes, we show the county with the smallest retail
expenditure total, Buffalo County in Wisconsin. If the entire retail
trade expenditures associated with the 2008 public use and recreation
regulations occurred in Buffalo County, this would amount to a 1.48
percent increase in annual retail expenditures.
[[Page 58986]]
Table 3.--Comparative Expenditures for Retail Trade Associated With Additional Refuge Visitation From 2008 Public Use and Recreation Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change due to 2008
public use and Change as percent Total number of Establishments
Retail trade in recreation of total retail retail with fewer than 10
2002 regulations (15- trade establishments employees
year span of CCP)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 County Area...................................... $9.8 billion $864,668 0.0097 24,878 17,957
Buffalo County, WI.................................. $58.3 million $864,668 1.48 350 290
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. We anticipate no
significant employment or small business effects. This rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. By the end of the 15-year CCP lifespan, the additional
recreational opportunities on the refuge would generate an additional
$865,000 in visitor expenditures with an economic impact estimated at
$1.06 million per year (2003 dollars). Consequently, the maximum
benefit of this rule for businesses both small and large would not be
sufficient to make this a major rule. The impact would be scattered
across 19 counties and would most likely not be significant in any
local area.
b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. We do not expect this proposed rule to
affect the supply or demand for wildlife observation, boating, camping,
and other general recreation opportunities in the United States and,
therefore, it should not affect prices for related recreation equipment
and supplies, or the retailers that sell equipment. Additional refuge
recreation opportunities would account for a virtually undetectable
percent of the available opportunities in the United States.
c. Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
proposed rule represents only a small proportion of recreational
spending of a small number of affected wildlife observers, boaters,
campers and other recreationists, approximately a maximum of $1.06
million annually in impact (economic output). Therefore, this rule
would have no measurable economic effect on the wildlife-dependent,
boating, and camping industries, which have annual sales of equipment
and travel expenditures of over $120 billion nationwide in 2006.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Since this proposed rule would apply to public use of federally
owned and managed refuges, it would not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than
$100 million per year. The rule would not have a significant or unique
effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications. This regulation would affect only
visitors to the refuge and describe what they can do while they are on
the refuge.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
As discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review and Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act sections above, this proposed rule would not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment under E.O. 13132. In preparing the CCP for the
refuge, we worked closely with the four States bordering the refuge,
and this proposed rule reflects the CCP.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that the proposed rule would not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order. This proposal would clarify and codify established
regulations and result in better understanding of the regulations by
refuge visitors.
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and use. E.O.
13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. Because this proposed rule is a
modification of existing public use and recreation programs on the
refuge, it is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, and
we do not expect it to significantly affect energy supplies,
distribution, and use. Therefore, this action is a not a significant
energy action and no Statement of Energy Effects is required.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects
on federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that there
are no effects. We coordinate recreational use on national wildlife
refuges with Tribal governments having adjoining or overlapping
jurisdiction before we propose changes to the regulations. During
scoping and preparation of the Final EIS, we contacted 35 Indian tribes
to inform them of the process and seek their comments.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not contain any information collection
requirements other than those already approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (OMB Control Number is 1018-0102). See 50 CFR 25.23 for
information concerning that approval. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
During preparation of the Final EIS, we completed a section 7
consultation
[[Page 58987]]
and determined that the preferred alternative, which included public
use and recreation changes reflected in this proposed rule, is not
likely to adversely affect individuals of listed or candidate species
or designated critical habitat of such species. The Service's
Ecological Services Office concurred with this determination. Listed
species on the refuge are the Higgins eye pearly mussel and candidate
species are the Eastern massasauga and spectaclecase and sheepnose
mussels. A copy of the section 7 evaluation and accompanying biological
assessment is available from the refuge at the location listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
National Environmental Policy Act
Concerning the actions that are the subject of this proposed
rulemaking, we have complied with NEPA through the preparation of a
Final EIS and Record of Decision which include the major public use and
recreation changes reflected in this proposed rule. The NEPA documents
are available on our Web site at https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/
uppermiss.
Available Information for Specific Districts of the Refuge
The refuge is divided into four districts for management,
administrative, and public service effectiveness and efficiency. These
districts correspond to two or more Mississippi River navigation pools
created by the series of locks and dams on the river. District offices
are located in Winona, Minnesota (Pools 4-6); La Crosse, Wisconsin
(Pools 7-8); McGregor, Iowa (Pools 9-11); and Savanna, Illinois (Pools
12-14). If you are interested in specific information pertaining to a
particular electric motor area; slow, no-wake area; or other feature
discussed in this proposed rule, you may contact the appropriate
district office listed below:
Winona District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 51 East Fourth
Street, Room 203, Winona, MN 55987; Telephone (507) 454-7351.
La Crosse District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 555 Lester
Avenue, Onalaska, WI 54650; Telephone (608) 783-8405.
McGregor District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 460,
McGregor, IA 52157; Telephone (563) 873-3423.
Savanna District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 7071 Riverview
Road, Thomson, IL 61285; Telephone (815) 273-2732.
Primary Author
Don Hultman, Refuge Manager, Upper Mississippi River National
Wildlife and Fish Refuge, is the primary author of this rulemaking
document.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 26
Recreation and recreation areas, Wildlife refuges.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, we propose to amend
title 50, Chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 26--[AMENDED]
1. Revise the authority citation for part 26 to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd-668ee, and
715i; Pub. L. 96-315 (94 Stat. 958) and Pub. L. 98-146 (97 Stat.
955).
2. Revise the heading, add an introductory paragraph, and
alphabetically add listings for the States of Illinois, Iowa,
Minnesota, and Wisconsin to Sec. 26.34 to read as follows:
Sec. 26.34 What are the special regulations concerning public access,
use and recreation for individual national wildlife refuges?
The following refuge units, listed in alphabetical order by State
and unit name, have refuge-specific regulations for public access, use,
and recreation.
Illinois
Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Refer to Sec. 26.34 Minnesota for regulations.
Iowa
Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Refer to Sec. 26.34 Minnesota for regulations.
Minnesota
Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
(a) Wildlife Observation, Photography, Interpretation,
Environmental Education, and Other General Recreational Uses. We allow
wildlife-dependent uses and other recreational uses such as, but not
limited to, sightseeing, hiking, bicycling on roads or trails,
picnicking, and swimming, on areas designated by the refuge manager and
shown on maps available at refuge offices, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) In areas posted and shown on maps as ``No Entry--Sanctuary,''
we prohibit entry as specified on signs or maps (see Sec. 32.42 of
this chapter for list of areas and locations).
(2) In areas posted and shown on maps as ``Area Closed,'' ``Area
Closed--No Motors,'' and ``No Hunting Zone'' (Goose Island), we ask
that you practice voluntary avoidance of these areas by any means or
for any purpose from October 15 to the end of the respective State duck
hunting season. In areas marked ``no motors,'' we prohibit the use of
motors on watercraft from October 15 to the end of the respective State
duck hunting season (see Sec. 32.42 of this chapter for list of areas
and locations).
(3) Commercial tours and filming require a permit issued by the
refuge or district manager (see Sec. 27.51 of this chapter).
(4) We allow the collecting of edible fruits, nuts, mushrooms, or
other plant parts for personal use (no sale or barter allowed). We
limit the amount you may collect to 2 gallons by volume per person, per
day (see Sec. 27.51 of this chapter).
(5) We prohibit the harvest of wild rice; plant and animal
specimens; and other natural objects, including shed deer antlers,
rocks, stones, or minerals. We only allow the collection of plants or
their parts for ornamental use by permit issued by the refuge or
district manager (see Sec. 27.51 of this chapter).
(6) We prohibit the cutting, removal, or damage of any tree or
vegetation, or the possession of a chainsaw on the refuge, without a
permit from the refuge or district manager. We prohibit attaching
nails, screws, or other hardware to any tree (see Sec. 27.51 and Sec.
32.42 of this chapter).
(7) We prohibit all vehicle use on or across refuge lands at any
time except on designated routes of travel or on the ice over navigable
waters accessed from boat landings. We prohibit parking beyond vehicle
control barriers or on grass or other vegetation. We prohibit parking
or operating vehicles in a manner that obstructs or impedes any road,
trail, fire lane, boat ramp, access gate, or other facility, or in a
manner that creates a safety hazard or endangers any person, property,
or environmental feature. We may impound any vehicle left parked in
violation at the owner's expense (see Sec. 27.31(h) of this chapter).
(8) We allow dogs and other domestic animals on the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) We prohibit dogs disturbing or endangering wildlife or people
while on the refuge.
(ii) While on the refuge, all dogs must be under the control of
their owners/handlers at all times or on a leash.
(iii) We prohibit allowing dogs to roam.
[[Page 58988]]
(iv) All dogs must be on a leash when on hiking trails, or other
areas so posted.
(v) We allow working a dog in refuge waters by tossing a retrieval
dummy or other object for out-and-back exercise.
(vi) We encourage the use of dogs for hunting (see Sec. 32.42 of
this chapter), but we prohibit field trials and commercial/professional
dog training.
(vii) Owners/handlers of dogs are responsible for disposal of dog
droppings in refuge public use concentration areas such as trails,
sandbars, and boat landings.
(viii) We prohibit horses and all other domestic animals on the
refuge unless confined in a vehicle, boat, trailer, kennel or other
container (see Sec. 26.21 of this chapter).
(9) We prohibit the carrying, possessing, or discharging of
firearms (including dog training pistols and dummy launchers), air
guns, or any other weapons on the refuge, unless you are a licensed
hunter or trapper engaged in authorized activities during established
seasons, in accordance with Federal, State, and local regulations. We
prohibit target practice on the refuge (see Sec. Sec. 27.42 and 27.43
of this chapter).
(10) We prohibit the use or possession of glass food and beverage
containers on lands within the refuge.
(11) We require that you keep all refuge lands clean during your
period of use or occupancy. At all times you must keep all refuse,
trash, and litter contained in bags or other suitable containers and
not left scattered on the ground or in the water. You must remove all
personal property, refuse, trash, and litter immediately upon vacating
a site. We require that human solid waste and associated material be
either removed and properly disposed of off-refuge or be buried on site
to a depth of 6-8 inches (15-20 cm) and at least 50 feet (15 m) from
water's edge (see Sec. 27.94 of this chapter).
(b) Watercraft Use. We allow the use of watercraft of all types and
means of propulsion on all navigable waters of the refuge in accordance
with State regulations subject to the following conditions:
(1) In areas posted and shown on maps as ``Electric Motor Area,''
we prohibit motorized vehicles and watercraft year-round except
watercraft powered by electric motors or nonmotorized means. We do not
prohibit the possession of other watercraft motors in these areas, only
their use. These areas are named and located as follows:
(i) Island 42, Pool 5, Minnesota, 459 acres.
(ii) Snyder Lake, Pool 5A, Minnesota, 182 acres.
(iii) Mertes Slough, Pool 6, Wisconsin, 222 acres.
(iv) Browns Marsh, Pool 7, Wisconsin, 827 acres.
(v) Hoosier Lake, Pool 10, Wisconsin, 162 acres.
(2) In areas posted and shown on maps as ``Slow No Wake Area,'' we
require watercraft to travel at slow, no-wake speed from March 16
through October 31. We apply the applicable State definition of slow,
no-wake operation in these areas. We also prohibit the operation of
airboats or hovercraft in these areas from March 16 through October 31.
These areas are named and located as follows:
(i) Nelson-Trevino, Pool 4, Wisconsin, 2,626 acres (takes effect
March 16, 2009).
(ii) Denzers Slough, Pool 5A, Minnesota, 83 acres.
(iii) Black River Bottoms, Pool 7, Wisconsin, 815 acres.
(iv) Blue/Target Lake, Pool 8, Minnesota, 1,834 acres.
(v) Root River, Pool 8, Minnesota, 695 acres.
(vi) Reno Bottoms, Pool 9, Minnesota, 2,536 acres.
(vii) Nine Mile Island, Pool 12, Iowa, 454 acres.
(viii) Princeton, Pool 14, Iowa, 327 acres.
(3) In water access and travel routes posted and shown on maps as
``Slow No Wake Zone,'' we require watercraft to travel at slow, no-wake
speed at all times unless otherwise posted. We apply the respective
State definition of slow, no-wake operation in these areas.
(4) In portions of Spring Lake and Crooked Slough--Lost Mound, Pool
13, Illinois, posted as ``Slow, 5 mph When Boats Present'' and marked
on maps as ``Speed/Distance Regulation,'' we require watercraft
operators to reduce the speed of their watercraft to less than 5 mph (8
kph) when within 100 feet (30 m) of another watercraft that is anchored
or underway at 5 mph (8 kph) or less.
(5) We prohibit the mooring, beaching, or storing of watercraft on
the refuge without being used at least once every 24 hours. We define
``being used'' as a watercraft moved at least 100 feet (30 m) on the
water with operator on board. We prohibit the mooring of watercraft
within 200 feet (60 m) of refuge boat landings or ramps. We may impound
any watercraft moored in violation at the owner's expense (see Sec.
27.32 of this chapter).
(6) Conditions A1, A2, and A11 apply.
(c) Camping. We allow camping on all lands and waters of the refuge
as designated by the refuge manager and shown on maps available at
refuge offices subject to the following conditions:
(1) We define camping as erecting a tent or shelter of natural or
synthetic material, preparing a sleeping bag or other bedding material
for use, parking of a motor vehicle or mooring or anchoring of a
vessel, for the apparent purpose of overnight occupancy, or, occupying
or leaving personal property, including boats or other craft, at a site
anytime between the hours of 11 p.m. and 3 a.m.
(2) We prohibit camping at any one site for a period longer than 14
days during any 30-consecutive-day period. After 14 days, you must move
all persons, property, equipment, and boats to a new site located at
least .5 mile (.8 km) from the previous site.
(3) We prohibit camping within 100 feet (30 meters) of any refuge
boat landing, access area, parking lot, structure, road, trail, or
other recreation or management facility.
(4) We prohibit camping during waterfowl hunting seasons within
areas posted ``No Entry--Sanctuary,'' ``Area Closed,'' ``Area Closed--
No Motors,'' and ``No Hunting Zone'' or on any sites not clearly
visible from the main commercial navigation channel of the Mississippi
River (see Sec. 32.42 of this chapter).
(5) You must occupy campsites daily. We prohibit the leaving of
tents, camping equipment, or other property unattended at any site for
over 24 hours, and we may impound any equipment left in violation at
the owner's expense. We define occupy and attended as being present at
a site for a minimum of 2 hours daily.
(6) You must remove any tables, fireplaces, or other facilities
erected upon vacating a camping or day-use site.
(7) We allow campfires in conjunction with camping and day-use
activities subject to the following conditions (see Sec. 27.95 and
Sec. 32.42 of this chapter):
(i) You may only use dead wood on the ground, or materials brought
into the refuge such as charcoal or firewood. You must remove any
unused firewood brought into the refuge upon departure due to the
threat of invasive insects.
(ii) We prohibit building, attending, and maintaining a campfire
without sufficient clearance from flammable materials so as to prevent
its escape.
(iii) We prohibit building a fire at any developed facility
including, but not limited to, boat landings, access areas, parking
lots, roads, trails or any other recreation or management facility or
structure.
(iv) We prohibit burying live fires or hot coals.
[[Page 58989]]
(v) We prohibit burning or attempting to burn any nonflammable
materials or any materials that may produce toxic fumes or leave
hazardous waste. These materials include, but are not limited to, metal
cans, plastic containers, glass, fiberglass, treated wood products,
wood containing nails or staples, wire, floatation materials, or other
refuse.
(8) Conditions A4 through A11 apply.
* * * * *
Wisconsin
Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
Refer to Sec. 26.34 Minnesota for regulations.
Dated: October 5, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-20423 Filed 10-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P