Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Framework Adjustment 42, 58622-58630 [E7-20386]
Download as PDF
58622
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Conservation Plan (HCP) that will
provide the framework for distribution
and management of former Fort Ord
lands has not been completed.
Therefore, for the purpose of the draft
economic analysis, FORA was not
classified as a small entity. From this
analysis, we certify that the rule will
not, if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13211—Energy Supply,
Distribution, and Use
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. E.O. 13211
requires agencies to prepare Statements
of Energy Effects when undertaking
certain actions. One critical habitat unit
(Prunedale, Unit 7) contains 17 ac (7 ha)
of land held in a conservation easement
owned by Pacific Gas and Electric
Company. Pacific Gas and Electric
Company maintains power lines that
cross this unit; however, because the
company does not plan to develop this
land any further, the designation of
revised critical habitat is not expected to
have an adverse effect on energy
production. Although the proposed
designation of revised critical habitat for
Chorizanthe pungens var. pungens is
considered a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866 because it may
raise novel legal and policy issues, it is
not expected to significantly affect
energy supplies, distribution, or use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant
energy action, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.), the Service makes the following
findings:
(a) This rule would not produce a
Federal mandate. In general, a Federal
mandate is a provision in legislation,
statute, or regulation that would impose
an enforceable duty upon State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector,
and includes both ‘‘Federal
intergovernmental mandates’’ and
‘‘Federal private sector mandates.’’
These terms are defined in 2 U.S.C.
658(5)–(7). ‘‘Federal intergovernmental
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon State, local, or tribal
governments,’’ with two exceptions. It
excludes ‘‘a condition of federal
assistance.’’ It also excludes ‘‘a duty
arising from participation in a voluntary
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
Federal program,’’ unless the regulation
‘‘relates to a then-existing Federal
program under which $500,000,000 or
more is provided annually to State,
local, and tribal governments under
entitlement authority,’’ if the provision
would ‘‘increase the stringency of
conditions of assistance’’ or ‘‘place caps
upon, or otherwise decrease, the Federal
Government’s responsibility to provide
funding’’ and the State, local, or tribal
governments ‘‘lack authority’’ to adjust
accordingly. (At the time of enactment,
these entitlement programs were:
Medicaid; Aid to Families with
Dependent Children work programs;
Child Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social
Services Block Grants; Vocational
Rehabilitation State Grants; Foster Care,
Adoption Assistance, and Independent
Living; Family Support Welfare
Services; and Child Support
Enforcement.) ‘‘Federal private sector
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon the private sector, except (i) a
condition of Federal assistance; or (ii) a
duty arising from participation in a
voluntary Federal program.’’
The designation of critical habitat
does not impose a legally binding duty
on non-Federal government entities or
private parties. Under the Act, the only
regulatory effect is that Federal agencies
must ensure that their actions do not
destroy or adversely modify critical
habitat under section 7. Non-Federal
entities that receive Federal funding,
assistance, permits, or otherwise require
approval or authorization from a Federal
agency for an action, may be indirectly
impacted by the designation of critical
habitat. However, the legally binding
duty to avoid destruction or adverse
modification of critical habitat rests
squarely on the Federal agency.
Furthermore, to the extent that nonFederal entities are indirectly impacted
because they receive Federal assistance
or participate in a voluntary Federal aid
program, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act would not apply; nor would
critical habitat shift the costs of the large
entitlement programs listed above on to
State governments.
(b) As discussed in the draft economic
analysis of the proposed designation of
revised critical habitat for Chorizanthe
pungens var. pungens, there is expected
to be no impact on small governments
or small entities. There is no record of
consultations between the Service and
any of these governments since C. p.
var. pungens was listed as threatened on
February 4, 1994 (59 FR 5499). It is
likely that small governments involved
with developments and infrastructure
projects would be interested parties or
involved with projects involving section
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7 consultations for C. p. var. pungens
within their jurisdictional areas. Any
costs associated with this activity are
likely to represent a small portion of a
local government’s budget.
Consequently, we do not believe that
the designation of revised critical
habitat for the C. p. var. pungens would
significantly or uniquely affect these
small governmental entities. As such, a
Small Government Agency Plan is not
required.
Executive Order 12630—Takings
In accordance with Executive Order
12630 (‘‘Government Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Private Property Rights’’), we
have analyzed the potential takings
implications of proposing revised
critical habitat for Chorizanthe pungens
var. pungens. Critical habitat
designation does not affect landowner
actions that do not require Federal
funding or permits, nor does it preclude
development of habitat conservation
programs or issuance of incidental take
permits to permit actions that do require
Federal funding or permits to go
forward. The takings implications
assessment concludes that this proposed
designation of revised critical habitat for
C. p. var. pungens does not pose
significant takings implications.
Authors
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff of the Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office.
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: October 5, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–20241 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 070809451–7452–01]
RIN 0648–AV79
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Framework Adjustment 42
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
The current regulations
governing the Northeast (NE)
multispecies fishery contain a number
of inadvertent errors, omissions, and
ambiguities, including some that may
appear to be inconsistent with the
measures adopted by the New England
Fishery Management Council (Council)
and approved by the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) in recent actions
taken under the NE Multispecies
Fisheries Management Plan (FMP),
including Amendment 5, Framework
Adjustment (FW) 38, Amendment 13,
FW 40–A, FW 41, and FW 42. The
intent of this action is to correct these
errors and omissions and to clarify
specific regulations to ensure
consistency with, and accurately reflect
the intent of, previous actions under
this FMP.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AV79, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http:/
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Paper, disk, or CD-ROM
comments should be sent to Patricia A.
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
National Marine Fisheries Service, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope,
‘‘Comments on the Proposed Rule to
Correct/Modify NE Multispecies
Regulations.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publically accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR) prepared for this action
are available upon request from the
Regional Administrator at the above
address. Copies of the environmental
assessments (EAs) prepared for FW 42,
FW 41, FW 40–A, and FW 38; and the
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
supplemental environmental impact
statements (SEIS) prepared for
Amendments 5 and 13 may be obtained
from Paul J. Howard, Executive Director,
New England Fishery Management
Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2,
Newburyport, MA 01950.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to David Rostker,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas W. Christel, Fishery Policy
Analyst, phone (978) 281–9141, fax
(978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The most recent management action
in the NE multispecies fishery, FW 42,
was implemented by a final rule that
published in the Federal Register on
October 23, 2006 (71 FR 62156) and
became effective on November 22, 2006.
FW 42 superseded measures
implemented by an emergency final rule
that published on April 13, 2006 (71 FR
19348) that was implemented because of
a delay in the development of FW 42.
However, upon further review of
regulations implemented by the FW 42
final rule, NMFS found that the current
regulations contained several
inadvertent errors, omissions, and
ambiguities that appear to be
inconsistent with the measures adopted
by the Council and approved by the
Secretary. Some of the errors were due
to failure of the current regulations to
adapt or reinstate measures that were
included or modified by the April 13,
2006, emergency final rule. Other errors
were the result of incorrect references or
a failure to adequately address
administrative issues associated with
specific measures. Further review of the
current regulations revealed that there
were other errors related to previous
management actions under the FMP,
including Amendments 5 and 13, FW
40–A, FW 41, and FW 38, as specified
below. Pursuant to section 305(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), this action
proposes to correct these errors, revise
specific measures to facilitate
administration of such measures, and
clarify or modify the current regulations
to maintain consistency with FW 42 and
other previous actions. The following
proposed corrections are listed in the
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58623
order in which they appear in the
regulations.
Proposed Measures
1. Definitions for Lessor, Lessee,
Transferor, and Tranferee
The April 27, 2004, final rule
implementing measures approved under
Amendment 13 (69 FR 22906) created
two programs designed to allow vessels
to obtain additional NE multispecies
days-at-sea (DAS) in order to offset the
economic impacts of effort reductions
under that action. These programs, the
DAS Leasing and DAS Transfer
Programs, include provisions that
specifically apply to either the vessel
giving or receiving DAS. While the
regulations refer to these vessels as the
‘‘lessor/transferor’’ and ‘‘lessee/
transferee’’ for both of these programs,
respectively, the Amendment 13 final
rule never explicitly defined these
terms. As a result, this rule would
define each of these terms at 50 CFR
648.2 to clarify the applicability of
specific provisions for each of these
programs.
2. Vessel Monitoring System (VMS)
Notification Requirements
Currently, vessels issued limited
access permits in several fisheries are
either required to use VMS, or may elect
to use VMS in lieu of using the DAS
call-in system. The final rule
implementing FW 42 required all NE
multispecies vessels fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS to use VMS and
indicated that such vessels would be
sent letters detailing the procedures
pertaining to VMS purchase,
installation, and use. However, the
current regulations do not specifically
address what procedures other vessels
using VMS should follow.
Because the NMFS VMS and DAS
systems use the VMS activity code
declared by the vessel operator to
enforce existing area-based regulations
and accurately charge DAS based upon
where the vessel fishes, what gear the
vessel uses, the DAS type used, and the
management program in which the
vessel is participating, it is critical that
the VMS activity code declared on each
trip accurately reflects the vessel’s
intended operations. If the VMS activity
code is incorrect, for example, DAS
could be inaccurately charged and a
vessel may be subject to enforcement
action, increasing the burden on both
vessel operators and NMFS for
inaccurate VMS declarations. Although
the current regulations do not
specifically detail how and when a
vessel should declare its intended
fishing activity via VMS for all fisheries,
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
58624
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
NMFS believes it is essential that all
vessels using VMS must declare their
intended activity through VMS prior to
each trip to ensure that the VMS activity
code declared accurately represents the
vessel’s intended activity for that trip.
NMFS has recently sent letters to all
affected permit holders instructing
vessel operators on the proper use of
VMS, including a letter on March 7,
2007, that required vessel operators to
declare a VMS activity code prior to
each trip.
The FW 42 final rule modified the
regulations at § 648.10(b)(2) to state that
NMFS shall send letters to all limited
access NE multispecies DAS permit
holders providing detailed information
on the procedures pertaining to VMS
usage. Because the current regulations
do not specifically describe the
procedures pertaining to VMS usage in
other fisheries, this action would
modify the VMS notification
requirements at § 648.10(b)(2) to specify
that NMFS would send letters
specifying the procedures pertaining to
VMS purchase, installation, and use to
all affected permit holders. Thus, this
action would clarify that vessels
required, or electing to use VMS are
subject to the VMS usage requirements
outlined in any previous and future
permit holder letters. In addition, this
action would specify at § 648.10(b)(5)
that vessels using VMS must declare the
vessel’s intended fishing activity via
VMS prior to leaving port before each
fishing trip.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
3. Gulf of Maine (GOM) Grate Raised
Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting
Fishery Prohibitions
The GOM Grate Raised Footrope
Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery was
implemented through a July 9, 2003,
final rule (68 FR 40808). However, this
final rule did not update the
prohibitions at § 648.14(a)(35) and (43)
to include this new exempted fishery.
The prohibition at § 648.14(a)(35)
prohibits the use of small mesh outside
of listed exempted fisheries, while the
prohibition at § 648.14(a)(43) indicates
that it is unlawful for anyone to violate
the provisions of listed exempted
fisheries. This action would add a
reference to the GOM Grate Raised
Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting
Fishery at § 648.80(a)(16) to these
prohibitions.
4. In-season Action Prohibition
Starting with the implementation of
Amendment 13 in 2004, the FMP has
developed several Special Management
Programs that provide the Regional
Administrator with the authority to
implement in-season adjustments to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
management measures, including
revising trip limits, access to specific
areas, and gear requirements. In-season
actions are implemented through a
temporary rule, with requirements
outlined in letters sent to affected
permit holders. Despite the authority to
implement such in-season actions, there
is no specific prohibition regarding the
provisions of an in-season action.
Therefore, this action would implement
a provision at § 648.14(a)(78)
prohibiting vessels from violating the
requirements of an in-season action.
5. Georges Bank (GB) Seasonal Closure
Area Applicability
The GB Seasonal Closure Area was
first implemented by the final rule
implementing measures approved under
FW 33 to the FMP (April 24, 2000; 65
FR 21658). This closure applies to any
vessel fishing with gear capable of
catching groundfish and is effective
from May 1 through May 31 of each
fishing year. On November 19, 2004, the
final rule implementing FW 40–A (69
FR 67780) established the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock Special Access
Program (SAP). This SAP allows vessels
to target haddock using Category B DAS
from May 1 through December 31 of
each fishing year. The SAP area
includes portions of the GB Seasonal
Closure Area during the period of the
closure. When the Council developed
this SAP, it intended to exempt these
SAP participants from the GB Seasonal
Closure Area. However, the regulations
implementing FW 40–A did not exempt
such participating vessels from this
closure. As a result, a final rule
corrected this oversight and exempted
vessels participating in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area Haddock SAP from the GB
Seasonal Closure Area (December 27,
2005; 70 FR 76422). Both the April 13,
2006, emergency rule and the FW 42
final rule adjusted the start date of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP from
May 1 to August 1 of each fishing year.
As a result, an exemption from the GB
Seasonal Closure Area is no longer
necessary for vessels participating in
that SAP. Therefore, this action would
remove the exemption at
§ 648.81(g)(2)(iv).
6. DAS Leasing Program Application
Requirements
The final rule implementing
Amendment 13 established the DAS
Leasing Program. This program allows
vessels to temporarily exchange
Category A DAS on a yearly basis,
provided participating vessels submit an
application to lease DAS and the
Regional Administrator approves the
lease request. The FW 42 final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
revised the introductory text of the DAS
Leasing Program regulations at
§ 648.82(k)(3). However, through an
oversight in the regulatory text for that
rule, the regulations at § 648.82(k)(3)(i)
through (iii) were inadvertently
removed. These regulations include the
DAS Leasing Program application
requirements and the authority of the
Regional Administrator to approve or
disapprove DAS leasing applications.
These provisions are necessary to
effectively administer the DAS Leasing
Program. Therefore, this action would
reinsert the provisions at
§ 648.82(k)(3)(i) through (iii) that were
inadvertently removed.
7. VMS Positional Polling Rates for U.S./
Canada Management Area
For vessels required to use VMS, the
current regulations specify the
minimum VMS positional polling rate.
Vessels are responsible for paying for
such VMS positional polls. When the
Council adopted measures to include in
Amendment 13, the Council did not
specify a particular VMS positional
polling rate that vessels would be
responsible for paying for while fishing
in the U.S./Canada Management Area.
However, the Amendment 13 final rule
indicated that a vessel participating in
the U.S./Canada Management Area
would be subject to a minimum VMS
position polling rate of two polls per
hour at the vessel’s expense. NMFS,
under the authority provided in section
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
included this increased polling rate
with the intent to facilitate and enhance
the enforcement of area-specific
management provisions. While NMFS
can request a vendor to temporarily
increase the VMS positional polling rate
on individual vessels in any fishery at
the Agency’s expense to facilitate
enforcement operations, to date, NMFS
has not imposed the higher VMS
positional polling rate on individual NE
multispecies trips into the U.S./Canada
Management Area, which would be at a
participating vessel’s expense, due to
technical limitations.
Since implementing this requirement
for vessels to pay for an increased
polling frequency, NMFS has
determined that such a measure should
originate with the Council, similar to
the way the Council adopted the
requirement for vessels to pay for a
polling rate of two VMS positional polls
per hour for vessels participating in the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery. The VMS
positional polling rate for which all
other vessels using VMS are required to
pay for is one positional poll per hour.
Because the Council did not specifically
recommend that NE multispecies
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
vessels must pay for a higher VMS
polling rate while fishing in the U.S./
Canada Management Area, NMFS has
decided to remove the increased VMS
positional polling rate applicable to NE
multispecies vessels. Therefore, this
action would remove references to an
increased VMS positional polling rate
for vessels participating in the U.S./
Canada Management Area from the
regulations at §§ 648.9(c)(1)(ii),
648.10(b)(2)(iii), and 648.85(a)(3)(i).
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
8. Haddock Total Allowable Catch
(TAC) in the Closed Area (CA) I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP
The CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP
was first implemented by the FW 40–A
final rule, but was later modified by the
rule implementing measures approved
under FW 41 to the FMP (September 14,
2005; 70 FR 54302). The FW 41 final
rule split the SAP into two seasons (one
season for vessels participating in an
approved Sector and another season for
non-Sector vessels), with the haddock
TAC distributed accordingly. The FW
42 final rule further modified the
manner in which the haddock TAC for
this SAP is calculated, but did not
revise the season or the distribution of
the haddock TAC. The regulations
implemented by the FW 42 final rule
included revisions to the manner in
which the haddock TAC is calculated,
but inadvertently omitted the provisions
that distributed the haddock TAC
among the two seasons, including the
authority of the Regional Administrator
to adjust the quota to each season to
account for under- or over-harvest of the
haddock TAC during the first season of
the SAP. Accordingly, the current
regulations do not accurately reflect the
provisions adopted by the Council and
implemented under the FW 41 final
rule. These provisions are necessary to
administer this SAP effectively.
Therefore, this action would revise the
regulations at § 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(F) to
reinsert the FW 41 provisions that were
inadvertently removed.
9. White Hake Trip Limits
Early in the development of FW 42,
the Council considered adopting a 500–
lb (226.8–kg) per DAS, up to 5,000–lb
(2,268–kg) per trip, limit for white hake.
In order to implement the trip limits as
soon as possible while FW 42 was still
being developed, NMFS implemented
an emergency rule establishing these
trip limits. Subsequently, the Council
adopted a white hake trip limit of 1,000
lb (453.6 kg) per DAS, up to 10,000 lb
(4,536 kg) per trip in FW 42. The
emergency rule was modified on April
28, 2006 (71 FR 25094) to reflect the
white hake trip limit adopted by the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
Council in FW 42. However, both the
FW 42 proposed and final rules
inadvertently included the lower white
hake trip limit included in the original
emergency final rule. Therefore, this
action would correct the white hake trip
limit found at § 648.86(e) to accurately
reflect the white hake trip limit adopted
by the Council in FW 42.
10. Approval of Sector Applications
The procedure to review and approve
sector allocations was first established
through the Amendment 13 final rule.
Although the SEIS prepared to support
Amendment 13 did not specifically
direct NMFS to publish a proposed rule
when reviewing sector applications and
operations plans, the Amendment 13
final rule included language that
required NMFS to seek public comment
on proposed sector operations plans
through the publication of a proposed
rule in the Federal Register. The
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
allows agencies to waive the
requirement to publish a proposed rule
and to provide for public comment in
limited circumstances. However,
because the current regulations require
NMFS to develop a proposed rule for
each sector, NMFS must publish a
proposed rule for sectors and does not
have the ability to take advantage of the
provision in the APA that allows the
Assistant Administrator to waive
proposed rulemaking should
circumstances allow. Based upon the
existing procedures and associated time
lines, the requirement to develop a
proposed rule may be too inflexible and
can unnecessarily delay the start of
proposed sector operations beyond the
start of the fishing year on May 1. This
can create unnecessary adverse
economic and social impacts for sector
participants, especially if the sector
operations plans do not change between
fishing years. Therefore, this action
would revise the existing sector
approval regulations at § 648.87(c)(1)
and (2) by removing the requirement to
develop a proposed rule, but indicating
that sectors would be approved
consistent with applicable law.
11. Recreational Fish Size Restrictions
Although minimum fish size
restrictions have been implemented
since the initial development of the
FMP, the final rule implementing
measures approved under Amendment
5 (March 1, 1994; 59 FR 9872) specified
that the minimum fish sizes also apply
to any fish or part of a fish, including
fillets. The Amendment 5 SEIS indicates
that fish or fish parts must have the skin
on for the purposes of identification to
facilitate enforcement of the minimum
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58625
size provisions. The SEIS only provides
one exception to this requirement,
allowing commercial vessels to retain
up to 25 lb (11.3 kg) of fillets of legalsized fish for personal consumption.
While not explicitly indicated, the
intent of the skin-on provision applies
to groundfish caught by any vessel—
commercial, charter/party, or private
recreational vessel.
The regulations implemented by the
Amendment 5 final rule clearly outline
the minimum fish size provisions for
commercial vessels at § 648.83,
including the skin-on provision in
paragraph (a)(2) of that section.
However, the recreational minimum fish
size requirements at § 648.89 do not
specifically include the skin-on
provision. Because the charter/party
regulations at § 648.89 do not
specifically indicate that the skin-on
provisions applies to such vessels, this
action would add the skin-on provision
outlined at § 648.83(a)(2) at
§ 648.89(b)(4).
12. Additional Corrections
In addition to the changes specified
above, the following changes to the
regulations as amended by the final rule
implementing FW 42 are proposed to
correct inaccurate references and to
further clarify the intent of FW 42 and
previous actions. The changes listed
below are in the order in which they
appear in the regulations.
In § 648.4(c)(2)(iii)(A), the reference to
the annual designation as either a Day
or Trip gillnet vessel at ‘‘§ 648.82(k)’’
would be corrected to read ‘‘§ 648.82(j).’’
In § 648.14, the reference to
‘‘§ 648.81(d)’’ in paragraph (a)(38)
would be corrected to reference the
transiting provision at § 648.81(i); the
reference to ‘‘§ 648.81(b)(2)(i)’’ in
paragraph (a)(39) would be corrected to
reference the transiting provision at
§ 648.81(i); the reference to
‘‘§ 648.51(a)(2)(ii) and (e)(2)’’ in
paragraph (a)(53) would be corrected to
reference the gear stowage provisions at
§ 648.23(b); the reference to
‘‘§ 648.85(b)(6)’’ in paragraph (a)(153)
would be corrected to read
‘‘§ 648.85(b)(4);’’ the reference to
‘‘§ 648.86(g)(1)(i) or (g)(2)(i)’’ in
paragraph (b)(3) would be revised to
read ‘‘§ 648.86(g)(1),’’ as § 648.86(g)(1)(i)
and (g)(2) expired when the April 13,
2006, emergency rule (71 FR 19348) was
superceded by the FW 42 final rule; the
reference to ‘‘§ 648.86(g)(1)(i) or
(g)(2)(i)’’ and ‘‘§ 648.81(g)(1)(ii) and
(g)(2)(ii)’’ in paragraph (b)(4) would be
corrected to read ‘‘§ 648.86(g)(1),’’ as
§ 648.86(g)(1)(i) and (g)(2) expired when
the April 13, 2006, emergency rule was
superceded by the FW 42 final rule; the
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
58626
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
reference to ‘‘§ 648.86(b)(1)(i)’’ in
paragraph (c)(24) would be corrected to
read ‘‘§ 648.86(b)(1);’’ and the reference
to ‘‘§ 648.86(b)(2)(ii) or (iii)’’ in
paragraph (c)(26) would be corrected to
read ‘‘§ 648.86(b)(2).’’
In § 648.80(b)(2)(vi), the reference to
‘‘(a)(11)(i)(A) and (B)’’ in the
introductory text would be corrected to
read ‘‘(b)(11)(i)(A) and (B).’’
In § 648.82(e)(1), the reference to
‘‘§ 648.10(c)(5)’’ would be corrected to
read ‘‘§ 648.10.’’
In § 648.85, the reference to
‘‘§ 648.94(b)(7)’’ in paragraph
(b)(6)(iv)(D) would be revised to read
‘‘§ 648.94(b)(3),’’ as § 648.94(b)(7)
expired when the April 13, 2006,
emergency rule was superceded by the
FW 42 final rule; and the references to
‘‘§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(G)’’ in paragraph
(b)(7)(iii), (b)(7)(v)(D), and (b)(7)(vi)(D)
would be corrected to read
‘‘§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(F),’’ as
§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(G) expired when the
April 13, 2006, emergency rule was
superceded by the FW 42 final rule. In
addition, reference to specific stock
areas at § 648.85(b)(6)(v) would be
added to § 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(D) to clarify
that the landing limits specified in this
paragraph apply to particular stock
areas. Further, reference to § 648.10
would be inserted at
§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(A) to clarify how DAS
would be counted in the Closed Area I
Hook Gear Haddock SAP. Finally,
§ 648.85(b)(7)(vi)(G) through (I) would
be removed, as these paragraphs were
included in the April 13, 2006,
emergency rule and expired when that
rule was superceded by the FW 42 final
rule.
In § 648.86(i), the references to
‘‘§ 648.85(a)(3)(iv)’’ and
‘‘§ 648.85(a)(6)(iv)(D)’’ would be
corrected to read ‘‘§ 648.85.’’
In § 648.92, paragraph (b)(2)(iii)
would be deleted, as this repeats the
regulations at § 648.92(b)(2)(ii) and is
not necessary.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304 (b)(1)(A) and
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
Assistant Administrator for fisheries,
NOAA, has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the NE
Multispecies FMP, other provisions of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination
is as follows:
The proposed allocation would correct/
clarify the existing regulations to ensure that
the current regulations accurately reflect
measures adopted by the New England
Fishery Management Council and approved
by the Secretary of Commerce. This action
would ensure that the economic impacts
analyzed in previous actions would be
realized, but would not impose any
additional economic impacts on affected
entities. The proposed action would not
significantly reduce profit for affected
vessels, as the proposed measures are either
administrative in nature and would not affect
vessel operations, or would have no
economic impact beyond that previously
analyzed. For example, FW 42 indicated that
declarations of a vessel’s intended activity
via VMS prior to each trip would cost
groundfish vessels approximately $0.50 per
declaration, or about $15,000 per year. In
addition, Amendment 13 indicated that the
U.S./Canada Management Area gear
requirements would cost participating
vessels $7,500 for a modified flounder net, or
$747 to comply with the haddock separator
trawl requirement. This action would simply
clarify or reinstate such requirements,
respectively, but would not increase costs
associated with these measures. Other
measures corrected or clarified by this action
would ensure that unnecessary costs, such as
the costs for higher VMS positional polling
rates, are eliminated or that vessels would be
able to fully realize the economic benefits of
special management programs by correctly
distributing the available haddock resources
in the Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock
SAP.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains a number
of collection-of-information
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) which have been
approved by OMB as follows:
1. VMS purchase and installation,
OMB # 0648–0202, (1 hr/response);
2. VMS proof of installation, OMB #
0648–0202, (1 hr/response);
3. Automated VMS polling of vessel
position, OMB # 0648–0202, (5 sec/
response);
4. Area and DAS declarations via
VMS, OMB # 0648–0549 (5 min/
response);
5. Standardized catch reporting
requirements, OMB # 0648–0212 (15
min/response);
6. Sector manager daily reports for CA
I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, OMB #
0648–0212, (2 hr/response);
7. DAS Leasing Program application,
OMB # 0648–0202, (5 min/response);
8. Annual declaration to participate in
the CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, OMB
# 0648–0202, (2 min/response);
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9. Sector allocation proposal, OMB #
0648–0202, (50 hr/response); and
10. Sector operations plan
submission, OMB # 0648–0202, (50 hr/
response).
These estimates include the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. This action would not
create new information collections or
modify the response time associated
with any of the information collection
referenced above. Instead, this action
would revise the regulations underlying
these information collections to correct
inadvertent errors, omissions, and
ambiguities in the current regulations,
as described in the preamble. Send
comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and
reporting.
Dated: October 11, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.2, definitions for ‘‘lessee,’’
‘‘lessor,’’ ‘‘transferee,’’ and ‘‘transferor’’
are added, in alphabetical order, to read
as follows:
§ 648.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Lessee means a vessel owner who
receives temporarily transferred NE
multispecies DAS from another vessel
through the DAS Leasing Program
specified at § 648.82(k).
Lessor means a vessel owner who
temporarily transfers NE multispecies
DAS to another vessel through the DAS
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Leasing Program specified at
§ 648.82(k).
*
*
*
*
*
Transferee means a vessel owner who
receives permanently transferred NE
multispecies DAS and potentially other
permits from another vessel through the
DAS Transfer Program specified at
§ 648.82(l).
Transferor means a vessel owner who
permanently transfers NE multispecies
DAS and potentially other permits to
another vessel through the DAS Transfer
Program specified at § 648.82(l).
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 648.4, paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.4
Vessel permits.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) For vessels fishing for NE
multispecies with gillnet gear, with the
exception of vessels fishing under the
Small Vessel permit category, an annual
declaration as either a Day or Trip
gillnet vessel designation as described
in § 648.82(j). A vessel owner electing a
Day or Trip gillnet designation must
indicate the number of gillnet tags that
he/she is requesting, and must include
a check for the cost of the tags. A permit
holder letter will be sent to the owner
of each eligible gillnet vessel, informing
him/her of the costs associated with this
tagging requirement and providing
directions for obtaining tags. Once a
vessel owner has elected this
designation, he/she may not change the
designation or fish under the other
gillnet category for the remainder of the
fishing year. Incomplete applications, as
described in paragraph (e) of this
section, will be considered incomplete
for the purpose of obtaining
authorization to fish in the NE
multispecies gillnet fishery and will be
processed without a gillnet
authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 648.9 [Amended]
4. In § 648.9, remove and reserve
paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
5. In § 648.10, the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(2), and paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) are revised; and paragraph
(b)(5) is added to read as follows:
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
*
§ 648.10 DAS and VMS notification
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) The owner of such a vessel
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, with the exception of a vessel
issued a limited access NE multispecies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
permit as specified in paragraph
(b)(1)(vi) of this section, must provide
documentation to the Regional
Administrator at the time of application
for a limited access permit that the
vessel has an operational VMS unit
installed on board that meets the
minimum performance criteria, unless
otherwise allowed under this paragraph
(b). If a vessel has already been issued
a limited access permit without the
owner providing such documentation,
the Regional Administrator shall allow
at least 30 days for the vessel to install
an operational VMS unit that meets the
criteria and for the owner to provide
documentation of such installation to
the Regional Administrator. The owner
of a vessel issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit that fishes or
intends to fish under a Category A or B
DAS as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(vi)
of this section must provide
documentation to the Regional
Administrator that the vessel has an
operational VMS unit installed on board
that meets those criteria prior to fishing
under a groundfish DAS. NMFS shall
send letters to all affected permit
holders providing detailed information
on the procedures pertaining to VMS
purchase, installation, and use.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) DAS counting for a vessel that is
under the VMS notification
requirements of this paragraph (b), with
the exception of vessels that have
elected to fish exclusively in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area on a particular trip, as
described in this paragraph (b), begins
with the first location signal received
showing that the vessel crossed the
VMS Demarcation Line after leaving
port. DAS counting ends with the first
location signal received showing that
the vessel crossed the VMS Demarcation
Line upon its return to port. For those
vessels that have elected to fish
exclusively in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area pursuant to § 648.85(a)(3)(ii), the
requirements of this paragraph (b) begin
with the first location signal received
showing that the vessel crossed into the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area and end with
the first location signal received
showing that the vessel crossed out of
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area upon
beginning its return trip to port, unless
the vessel elects to also fish outside the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the same
trip, in accordance with
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) VMS notification requirements for
other fisheries. Unless otherwise
specified in this part, or via letters sent
to affected permit holders under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58627
owner or authorized representative of a
vessel that is required to use VMS, as
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, must notify the Regional
Administrator of the vessel’s intended
fishing activity by entering the
appropriate VMS code prior to leaving
port at the start of each fishing trip.
Notification of a vessel’s intended
fishing activity includes, but is not
limited to, gear and DAS type to be
used; area to be fished; and whether the
vessel will be declared out of the DAS
fishery, or will participate in the NE
multispecies and monkfish DAS
fisheries, including approved special
management programs. A vessel cannot
change any aspect of its VMS activity
code outside of port, except that NE
multispecies vessels are authorized to
change the category of DAS used (i.e.,
flip its DAS), as provided at § 648.85(b),
or change the area declared to be fished
so that the vessel may fish both inside
and outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area on the same trip, as provided at
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A). VMS activity codes
and declaration instructions are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 648.14, paragraphs (a)(35),
(a)(38), (a)(39), (a)(43), (a)(53), (a)(153),
(b)(3), (b)(4), (c)(24), and (c)(26) are
revised and paragraph (a)(78) is added
to read as follows:
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
(a) * * *
(35) Fish with, use, or have on board,
within the areas described in
§ 648.80(a)(1) and (2), nets with mesh
size smaller than the minimum mesh
size specified in § 648.80(a)(3) and (4),
except as provided in § 648.80(a)(5)
through (8), (a)(9), (a)(10), (a)(15),
(a)(16), (d), (e), and (i), unless the vessel
has not been issued a NE multispecies
permit and fishes for NE multispecies
exclusively in state waters, or unless
otherwise specified in § 648.17.
*
*
*
*
*
(38) Enter or be in the area described
in § 648.81(a)(1) on a fishing vessel,
except as provided in § 648.81(a)(2) and
(i).
(39) Enter or be in the area described
in § 648.81(b)(1) on a fishing vessel,
except as provided in § 648.81(b)(2) and
(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(43) Violate any of the provisions of
§ 648.80, including paragraphs (a)(5),
the Small-mesh Northern Shrimp
Fishery Exemption Area; (a)(6), the
Cultivator Shoal Whiting Fishery
Exemption Area; (a)(9), Small-mesh
Area 1/Small-mesh Area 2; (a)(10), the
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
58628
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Nantucket Shoals Dogfish Fishery
Exemption Area; (a)(11), the GOM
Scallop Dredge Exemption Area; (a)(12),
the Nantucket Shoals Mussel and Sea
Urchin Dredge Exemption Area; (a)(13),
the GOM/GB Monkfish Gillnet
Exemption Area; (a)(14), the GOM/GB
Dogfish Gillnet Exemption Area; (a)(15),
the Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted
Whiting Fishery; (a)(16) the GOM Grate
Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted
Whiting Fishery; (a)(18), the Great South
Channel Scallop Dredge Exemption
Area; (b)(3), exemptions (small mesh);
(b)(5); the SNE Monkfish and Skate
Trawl Exemption Area; (b)(6), the SNE
Monkfish and Skate Gillnet Exemption
Area; (b)(8), the SNE Mussel and Sea
Urchin Dredge Exemption Area; (b)(9),
the SNE Little Tunny Gillnet Exemption
Area; and (b)(11), the SNE Scallop
Dredge Exemption Area. Each violation
of any provision in § 648.80 constitutes
a separate violation.
*
*
*
*
*
(53) Possess, land, or fish for
regulated species, except winter
flounder as provided for in accordance
with § 648.80(i) from or within the areas
described in § 648.80(i), while in
possession of scallop dredge gear on a
vessel not fishing under the scallop DAS
program as described in § 648.53, or
fishing under a general scallop permit,
unless the vessel and the dredge gear
conform with the stowage requirements
of § 648.23(b), or unless the vessel has
not been issued a multispecies permit
and fishes for NE multispecies
exclusively in state waters.
*
*
*
*
*
(78) Violate any provision of an inseason action to adjust trip limits, gear
usage, season, area access and/or
closure, or any other measure
authorized by this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(153) If fishing under the SNE/MA
Winter Flounder SAP, described in
§ 648.85(b)(4), fail to comply with the
restrictions and conditions under
§ 648.85(b)(4)(i) through (iv).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) While fishing in the areas
specified in § 648.86(g)(1), with a NE
multispecies Handgear A permit, or
under the NE multispecies DAS
program, or under the limited access
monkfish Category C or D permit
provisions, possess yellowtail flounder
in excess of the limits specified under
§ 648.86(g)(1), unless fishing under the
recreational or charter/party regulations,
or transiting in accordance with
§ 648.23(b).
(4) If fishing in the areas specified in
§ 648.86(g)(1) with a NE multispecies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
Handgear A permit, or under the NE
multispecies DAS program, or under the
limited access monkfish Category C or D
permit provisions, fail to comply with
the requirements specified in
§ 648.81(g)(1).
(c) * * *
(24) Enter port, while on a NE
multispecies DAS trip, in possession of
more than the allowable limit of cod
specified in § 648.86(b)(1), unless the
vessel is fishing under the cod
exemption specified in § 648.86(b)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
(26) Enter port, while on a NE
multispecies DAS trip, in possession of
more than the allowable limit of cod
specified in § 648.86(b)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 648.80, paragraph (b)(2)(vi) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.80 NE multispecies regulated mesh
areas and restrictions on gear and methods
of fishing.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) Other restrictions and
exemptions. Vessels are prohibited from
fishing in the SNE Exemption Area, as
defined in paragraph (b)(10) of this
section, except if fishing with exempted
gear (as defined under this part) or
under the exemptions specified in
paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(5) through (9),
(b)(11), (c), (e), (h), and (i) of this
section, or if fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS, if fishing under the
Small Vessel or Handgear A exemptions
specified in § 648.82(b)(5) and (b)(6),
respectively, or if fishing under a
scallop state waters exemption specified
in § 648.54, or if fishing under a scallop
DAS in accordance with paragraph (h)
of this section, or if fishing under a
General Category scallop permit in
accordance with paragraphs (b)(11)(i)(A)
and (B) of this section, or if fishing
pursuant to a NE multispecies open
access Charter/Party or Handgear
permit, or if fishing as a charter/party or
private recreational vessel in
compliance with the regulations
specified in § 648.89. Any gear on a
vessel, or used by a vessel, in this area
must be authorized under one of these
exemptions or must be stowed as
specified in § 648.23(b).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 648.81 [Amended]
8. In § 648.81, remove paragraph
(g)(2)(iv).
9. In § 648.82, paragraph (e)(1) is
revised and paragraphs (k)(3)(i) through
(iii) are added to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 648.82 Effort-control program for NE
multispecies limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) DAS shall accrue to the nearest
minute and, with the exceptions
described under this paragraph (e) and
paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this section, shall
be counted as actual time called, or
logged into the DAS program, consistent
with the DAS notification requirements
specified at § 648.10.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Application information
requirements. An application to lease
Category A DAS must contain the
following information: Lessor’s owner
name, vessel name, permit number and
official number or state registration
number; Lessee’s owner name, vessel
name, permit number and official
number or state registration number;
number of NE multispecies DAS to be
leased; total priced paid for leased DAS;
signatures of Lessor and Lessee; and
date form was completed. Information
obtained from the lease application will
be held confidential, according to
applicable Federal law. Aggregate data
may be used in the analysis of the DAS
Leasing Program.
(ii) Approval of lease application.
Unless an application to lease Category
A DAS is denied according to paragraph
(k)(3)(iii) of this section, the Regional
Administrator shall issue confirmation
of application approval to both Lessor
and Lessee within 45 days of receipt of
an application.
(iii) Denial of lease application. The
Regional Administrator may deny an
application to lease Category A DAS for
any of the following reasons, including,
but not limited to: The application is
incomplete or submitted past the March
1 deadline; the Lessor or Lessee has not
been issued a valid limited access NE
multispecies permit or is otherwise not
eligible; the Lessor’s or Lessee’s DAS are
under sanction pursuant to an
enforcement proceeding; the Lessor’s or
Lessee’s vessel is prohibited from
fishing; the Lessor’s or Lessee’s limited
access NE multispecies permit is
sanctioned pursuant to an enforcement
proceeding; the Lessor or Lessee vessel
is determined not in compliance with
the conditions, restrictions, and
requirements of this part; or the Lessor
has an insufficient number of allocated
or unused DAS available to lease. Upon
denial of an application to lease NE
multispecies DAS, the Regional
Administrator shall send a letter to the
applicants describing the reason(s) for
application rejection. The decision by
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the Regional Administrator is the final
agency decision.
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 648.85, paragraphs
(b)(7)(vi)(G) through (I) are removed,
and paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (b)(6)(iv)(D),
(b)(7)(iii), (b)(7)(iv)(A) and (F),
(b)(7)(v)(D), and (b)(7)(vi)(D) are revised
to read as follows:
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
§ 648.85
Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) VMS requirement. A NE
multispecies DAS vessel in the U.S./
Canada Management Areas described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section must
have installed on board an operational
VMS unit that meets the minimum
performance criteria specified in
§§ 648.9 and 648.10.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) * * *
(D) Landing limits. Unless otherwise
specified in this paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(D),
a NE multispecies vessel fishing in the
Regular B DAS Program described in
this paragraph (b)(6), and fishing under
a Regular B DAS, may not land more
than 100 lb (45.5 kg) per DAS, or any
part of a DAS, up to a maximum of
1,000 lb (454 kg) per trip, of any of the
following species/stocks from the areas
specified in paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this
section: Cod, American plaice, white
hake, witch flounder, SNE/MA winter
flounder, GB winter flounder, GB
yellowtail flounder, southern
windowpane flounder, and ocean pout;
and may not land more than 25 lb (11.3
kg) per DAS, or any part of a DAS, up
to a maximum of 250 lb (113 kg) per trip
of CC/GOM or SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder. In addition, trawl vessels,
which are required to fish with a
haddock separator trawl as specified
under paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J) of this
section, and other gear that may be
required in order to reduce catches of
stocks of concern as described under
paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J) of this section, are
restricted to the following trip limits:
500 lb (227 kg) of all flatfish species
(American plaice, witch flounder,
winter flounder, windowpane flounder,
and GB yellowtail flounder), combined;
500 lb (227 kg) of monkfish (whole
weight); 500 lb (227 kg) of skates (whole
weight); and zero possession of lobsters,
unless otherwise restricted by
§ 648.94(b)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(iii) Season. The overall season for the
CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP is
October 1 through December 31, which
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
is divided into two participation
periods, one for Sector and one for nonSector vessels. For the 2005 fishing year,
the only participation period in which
eligible Sector vessels may fish in the
CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP is from
October 1 through November 15. For the
2005 fishing year, the only participation
period in which eligible non-Sector
vessels may fish in the SAP is from
November 16 through December 31. For
the 2006 fishing year and beyond, these
participation periods shall alternate
between Sector and non-Sector vessels
such that, in fishing year 2006, the
participation period for non-Sector
vessels is October 1 through November
15, and the participation period for
Sector vessels is November 16 through
December 31. The Regional
Administrator may adjust the start date
of the second participation period prior
to November 16 if the haddock TAC for
the first participation period specified
in paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F) of this section
is harvested prior to November 15.
(iv) * * *
(A) DAS use restrictions. A vessel
fishing in the CA I Hook Gear Haddock
SAP may not initiate a DAS flip. A
vessel is prohibited from fishing in the
CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP while
making a trip under the Regular B DAS
Pilot Program described under
paragraph (b)(6) of this section. DAS
will be charged as described in § 648.10.
*
*
*
*
*
(F) Haddock TAC—(1) Allocation and
distribution. The maximum total
amount of haddock that may be caught
(landings and discards) in the Closed
Area I Hook Gear SAP Area in any
fishing year is based upon the size of the
TAC allocated for the 2004 fishing year
(1,130 mt live weight), adjusted
according to the growth or decline of the
western GB (WGB) haddock exploitable
biomass (in relationship to its size in
2004), according to the following
formula: BiomassYEAR X= (1,130 mt live
weight) x (Projected WGB Haddock
ExploitableBiomassYEAR X/WGB Haddock
Exploitable Biomass2004). The size of the
western component of the stock is
considered to be 35 percent of the total
stock size, unless modified by a stock
assessment. The maximum amount of
haddock that may be caught in this SAP
during each fishing year is divided
evenly between the two participation
periods of October 1 - November 15 and
November 16 - December 31, as
specified in paragraph (b)(7)(iii) of this
section. The Regional Administrator
shall specify the haddock TAC for the
SAP, in a manner consistent with
applicable law.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58629
(2) Adjustments to the haddock TAC.
The Regional Administrator may adjust
the portion of the haddock TAC
specified for the second participation
period to account for under- or overharvest of the portion of the haddock
TAC (landings and discards) that was
harvested during the first participation
period, not to exceed the overall
haddock TAC specified in this
paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F).
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(D) Reporting requirements. The
owner or operator of a Sector vessel
declared into the Closed Area I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP must submit reports
to the Sector Manager, with instructions
to be provided by the Sector Manager,
for each day fished in the Closed Area
I Hook Gear Haddock SAP Area. The
Sector Manager shall provide daily
reports to NMFS, including at least the
following information: Total pounds of
haddock, cod, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder,
American plaice, and white hake kept;
total pounds of haddock, cod, yellowtail
flounder, winter flounder, witch
flounder, American plaice, and white
hake discarded; date fish were caught;
and VTR serial number, as instructed by
the Regional Administrator. Daily
reporting must continue even if the
vessel operator is required to exit the
SAP as required under paragraph
(b)(7)(iv)(F) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
(D) Reporting requirements. The
owner or operator of a non-Sector vessel
declared into the Closed Area I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP must submit reports
via VMS, in accordance with
instructions to be provided by the
Regional Administrator, for each day
fished in the Closed Area I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP Area. The reports must be
submitted in 24–hr intervals for each
day fished, beginning at 0000 hr local
time and ending at 2400 hr local time.
The reports must be submitted by 0900
hr local time of the day following
fishing. The reports must include at
least the following information: Total
pounds of haddock, cod, yellowtail
flounder, winter flounder, witch
flounder, American plaice, and white
hake kept; total pounds of haddock, cod,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, American plaice, and
white hake discarded; date fish were
caught; and VTR serial number, as
instructed by the Regional
Administrator. Daily reporting must
continue even if the vessel operator is
required to exit the SAP as required
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
58630
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
under paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
11. In § 648.86, paragraphs (e) and (i)
are revised to read as follows:
§ 648.86 NE Multispecies possession
restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) White hake. Unless otherwise
restricted under this part, a vessel
issued a NE multispecies DAS permit, a
limited access Handgear A permit, an
open access Handgear B permit, or a
monkfish limited access permit and
fishing under the monkfish Category C
or D permit provisions may land up to
1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of white hake per
DAS, or any part of a DAS, up to 10,000
lb (4,536 kg) per trip.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Offloading requirement for vessels
possessing species regulated by a daily
possession limit. Vessels that have
ended a trip as specified in
§ 648.10(b)(2)(iii) or (c)(3) that possess
on board species regulated by a daily
possession limit (i.e., pounds per DAS),
as specified at § 648.85 or § 648.86, must
offload these species prior to leaving
port on a subsequent trip. Other species
regulated by an overall trip limit may be
retained on board for a subsequent trip.
For example, a vessel that possesses cod
and winter flounder harvested from
Georges Bank is subject to a daily
possession limit for cod of 1,000 lb (453
kg)/DAS and an overall trip limit of
5,000 lb (2,267 kg)/trip for winter
flounder. In this example, the vessel
would be required to offload any cod
harvested, but may retain on board
winter flounder up to the maximum trip
limit prior to leaving port and crossing
the VMS demarcation line to begin a
subsequent trip.
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 648.87, paragraphs (b)(1)(ix),
(b)(1)(xv) and (xvi), (b)(2)(x), and (c) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.87
Sector allocation.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ix) Unless exempted through a Letter
of Authorization specified in paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, each vessel
operator and/or vessel owner fishing
under an approved Sector must comply
with all NE multispecies management
measures of this part and other
applicable law. Each vessel and vessel
operator and/or vessel owner
participating in a Sector must also
comply with all applicable requirements
and conditions of the Operating Plan
specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section and the Letter of Authorization
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
issued pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of
this section. It shall be unlawful to
violate any such conditions and
requirements and each Sector, vessel,
and vessel operator and/or vessel owner
participating in the Sector may be
charged jointly and severally for civil
penalties and permit sanctions pursuant
15 CFR part 904.
*
*
*
*
*
(xv) All vessel operators and/or vessel
owners fishing in an approved Sector
must be issued and have on board the
vessel, a Letter of Authorization (LOA)
issued by the National Marine Fisheries
Service pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of
this section.
(xvi) The Regional Administrator may
exempt participants in the Sector,
pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, from any Federal fishing
regulations necessary to allow such
participants to fish in accordance with
the Operations Plan, with the exception
of regulations addressing the following
measures for Sectors based on a hard
TAC: Year-round closure areas,
permitting restrictions (e.g., vessel
upgrades, etc.), gear restrictions
designed to minimize habitat impacts
(e.g., roller gear restrictions, etc.), and
reporting requirements (not including
DAS reporting requirements). A
framework adjustment, as specified in
§ 648.90, may be submitted to exempt
Sector participants from regulations not
authorized to be exempted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(x) Each vessel and vessel operator
and/or vessel owner participating in a
Sector must comply with all applicable
requirements and conditions of the
Operations Plan specified in this
paragraph (b)(2) and the Letter of
Authorization issued pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section. It shall
be unlawful to violate any such
conditions and requirements unless
such conditions or restrictions are
identified as administrative only in an
approved Operations Plan. Each Sector,
vessel, and vessel operator and/or vessel
owner participating in the Sector may
be charged jointly and severally for civil
penalties and permit sanctions pursuant
to 15 CFR part 904.
(c) Approval of a Sector and granting
of exemptions by the Regional
Administrator. (1) Once the submission
documents specified under paragraphs
(a)(1) and (b)(2) of this section have
been determined to comply with the
requirements of this section, NMFS may
consult with the Council and shall
approve or disapprove Sector operations
consistent with applicable law.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) If a Sector is approved, the
Regional Administrator shall issue a
Letter of Authorization to each vessel
operator and/or vessel owner belonging
to the Sector. The Letter of
Authorization shall authorize
participation in the Sector operations
and may exempt participating vessels
from any Federal fishing regulation,
except those specified in paragraph
(b)(1)(xvi) of this section, in order to
allow vessels to fish in accordance with
an approved Operations Plan, provided
such exemptions are consistent with the
goals and objectives of the NE
Multispecies FMP. The Letter of
Authorization may also include
requirements and conditions deemed
necessary to ensure effective
administration of, and compliance with,
the Operations Plan and the Sector
allocation. Solicitation of public
comment on, and NMFS final
determination on such exemptions shall
be consistent with paragraphs (c)(1) and
(2) of this section.
(3) The Regional Administrator may
withdraw approval of a Sector, after
consultation with the Council, at any
time if it is determined that Sector
participants are not complying with the
requirements of an approved Operations
Plan or that the continuation of the
Operations Plan will undermine
achievement of fishing mortality
objectives of the NE Multispecies FMP.
Withdrawal of approval of a Sector may
only be done after notice and comment
rulemaking consistent with applicable
law.
*
*
*
*
*
13. In § 648.89, paragraph (b)(4) is
added to read as follows:
§ 648.89 Recreational and charter/party
vessel restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) The minimum fish size applies to
whole fish or to any part of a fish while
possessed on board either a charter/
party or a private recreational vessel.
Fish fillets, or parts of fish, must have
skin on while possessed on board a
vessel and at the time of landing in
order to meet minimum size
requirements. ‘‘Skin on’’ means the
entire portion of the skin normally
attached to the portion of the fish or to
fish parts possessed is still attached.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 648.92 [Amended]
14. In § 648.92, remove paragraph
(b)(2)(iii).
[FR Doc. E7–20386 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 16, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58622-58630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20386]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 070809451-7452-01]
RIN 0648-AV79
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Framework Adjustment 42
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
[[Page 58623]]
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The current regulations governing the Northeast (NE)
multispecies fishery contain a number of inadvertent errors, omissions,
and ambiguities, including some that may appear to be inconsistent with
the measures adopted by the New England Fishery Management Council
(Council) and approved by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) in
recent actions taken under the NE Multispecies Fisheries Management
Plan (FMP), including Amendment 5, Framework Adjustment (FW) 38,
Amendment 13, FW 40-A, FW 41, and FW 42. The intent of this action is
to correct these errors and omissions and to clarify specific
regulations to ensure consistency with, and accurately reflect the
intent of, previous actions under this FMP.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AV79, by any one
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http:/
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Paper, disk, or CD-ROM comments should be sent to
Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries
Service, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of
the envelope, ``Comments on the Proposed Rule to Correct/Modify NE
Multispecies Regulations.''
Fax: (978) 281-9135.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publically
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) prepared for this
action are available upon request from the Regional Administrator at
the above address. Copies of the environmental assessments (EAs)
prepared for FW 42, FW 41, FW 40-A, and FW 38; and the supplemental
environmental impact statements (SEIS) prepared for Amendments 5 and 13
may be obtained from Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA
01950.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to David Rostker, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), by e-mail to David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas W. Christel, Fishery Policy
Analyst, phone (978) 281-9141, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The most recent management action in the NE multispecies fishery,
FW 42, was implemented by a final rule that published in the Federal
Register on October 23, 2006 (71 FR 62156) and became effective on
November 22, 2006. FW 42 superseded measures implemented by an
emergency final rule that published on April 13, 2006 (71 FR 19348)
that was implemented because of a delay in the development of FW 42.
However, upon further review of regulations implemented by the FW 42
final rule, NMFS found that the current regulations contained several
inadvertent errors, omissions, and ambiguities that appear to be
inconsistent with the measures adopted by the Council and approved by
the Secretary. Some of the errors were due to failure of the current
regulations to adapt or reinstate measures that were included or
modified by the April 13, 2006, emergency final rule. Other errors were
the result of incorrect references or a failure to adequately address
administrative issues associated with specific measures. Further review
of the current regulations revealed that there were other errors
related to previous management actions under the FMP, including
Amendments 5 and 13, FW 40-A, FW 41, and FW 38, as specified below.
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), this action proposes to
correct these errors, revise specific measures to facilitate
administration of such measures, and clarify or modify the current
regulations to maintain consistency with FW 42 and other previous
actions. The following proposed corrections are listed in the order in
which they appear in the regulations.
Proposed Measures
1. Definitions for Lessor, Lessee, Transferor, and Tranferee
The April 27, 2004, final rule implementing measures approved under
Amendment 13 (69 FR 22906) created two programs designed to allow
vessels to obtain additional NE multispecies days-at-sea (DAS) in order
to offset the economic impacts of effort reductions under that action.
These programs, the DAS Leasing and DAS Transfer Programs, include
provisions that specifically apply to either the vessel giving or
receiving DAS. While the regulations refer to these vessels as the
``lessor/transferor'' and ``lessee/transferee'' for both of these
programs, respectively, the Amendment 13 final rule never explicitly
defined these terms. As a result, this rule would define each of these
terms at 50 CFR 648.2 to clarify the applicability of specific
provisions for each of these programs.
2. Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Notification Requirements
Currently, vessels issued limited access permits in several
fisheries are either required to use VMS, or may elect to use VMS in
lieu of using the DAS call-in system. The final rule implementing FW 42
required all NE multispecies vessels fishing under a NE multispecies
DAS to use VMS and indicated that such vessels would be sent letters
detailing the procedures pertaining to VMS purchase, installation, and
use. However, the current regulations do not specifically address what
procedures other vessels using VMS should follow.
Because the NMFS VMS and DAS systems use the VMS activity code
declared by the vessel operator to enforce existing area-based
regulations and accurately charge DAS based upon where the vessel
fishes, what gear the vessel uses, the DAS type used, and the
management program in which the vessel is participating, it is critical
that the VMS activity code declared on each trip accurately reflects
the vessel's intended operations. If the VMS activity code is
incorrect, for example, DAS could be inaccurately charged and a vessel
may be subject to enforcement action, increasing the burden on both
vessel operators and NMFS for inaccurate VMS declarations. Although the
current regulations do not specifically detail how and when a vessel
should declare its intended fishing activity via VMS for all fisheries,
[[Page 58624]]
NMFS believes it is essential that all vessels using VMS must declare
their intended activity through VMS prior to each trip to ensure that
the VMS activity code declared accurately represents the vessel's
intended activity for that trip. NMFS has recently sent letters to all
affected permit holders instructing vessel operators on the proper use
of VMS, including a letter on March 7, 2007, that required vessel
operators to declare a VMS activity code prior to each trip.
The FW 42 final rule modified the regulations at Sec. 648.10(b)(2)
to state that NMFS shall send letters to all limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit holders providing detailed information on the
procedures pertaining to VMS usage. Because the current regulations do
not specifically describe the procedures pertaining to VMS usage in
other fisheries, this action would modify the VMS notification
requirements at Sec. 648.10(b)(2) to specify that NMFS would send
letters specifying the procedures pertaining to VMS purchase,
installation, and use to all affected permit holders. Thus, this action
would clarify that vessels required, or electing to use VMS are subject
to the VMS usage requirements outlined in any previous and future
permit holder letters. In addition, this action would specify at Sec.
648.10(b)(5) that vessels using VMS must declare the vessel's intended
fishing activity via VMS prior to leaving port before each fishing
trip.
3. Gulf of Maine (GOM) Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting
Fishery Prohibitions
The GOM Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery was
implemented through a July 9, 2003, final rule (68 FR 40808). However,
this final rule did not update the prohibitions at Sec. 648.14(a)(35)
and (43) to include this new exempted fishery. The prohibition at Sec.
648.14(a)(35) prohibits the use of small mesh outside of listed
exempted fisheries, while the prohibition at Sec. 648.14(a)(43)
indicates that it is unlawful for anyone to violate the provisions of
listed exempted fisheries. This action would add a reference to the GOM
Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery at Sec.
648.80(a)(16) to these prohibitions.
4. In-season Action Prohibition
Starting with the implementation of Amendment 13 in 2004, the FMP
has developed several Special Management Programs that provide the
Regional Administrator with the authority to implement in-season
adjustments to management measures, including revising trip limits,
access to specific areas, and gear requirements. In-season actions are
implemented through a temporary rule, with requirements outlined in
letters sent to affected permit holders. Despite the authority to
implement such in-season actions, there is no specific prohibition
regarding the provisions of an in-season action. Therefore, this action
would implement a provision at Sec. 648.14(a)(78) prohibiting vessels
from violating the requirements of an in-season action.
5. Georges Bank (GB) Seasonal Closure Area Applicability
The GB Seasonal Closure Area was first implemented by the final
rule implementing measures approved under FW 33 to the FMP (April 24,
2000; 65 FR 21658). This closure applies to any vessel fishing with
gear capable of catching groundfish and is effective from May 1 through
May 31 of each fishing year. On November 19, 2004, the final rule
implementing FW 40-A (69 FR 67780) established the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock Special Access Program (SAP). This SAP allows vessels to target
haddock using Category B DAS from May 1 through December 31 of each
fishing year. The SAP area includes portions of the GB Seasonal Closure
Area during the period of the closure. When the Council developed this
SAP, it intended to exempt these SAP participants from the GB Seasonal
Closure Area. However, the regulations implementing FW 40-A did not
exempt such participating vessels from this closure. As a result, a
final rule corrected this oversight and exempted vessels participating
in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area Haddock SAP from the GB Seasonal
Closure Area (December 27, 2005; 70 FR 76422). Both the April 13, 2006,
emergency rule and the FW 42 final rule adjusted the start date of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP from May 1 to August 1 of each fishing
year. As a result, an exemption from the GB Seasonal Closure Area is no
longer necessary for vessels participating in that SAP. Therefore, this
action would remove the exemption at Sec. 648.81(g)(2)(iv).
6. DAS Leasing Program Application Requirements
The final rule implementing Amendment 13 established the DAS
Leasing Program. This program allows vessels to temporarily exchange
Category A DAS on a yearly basis, provided participating vessels submit
an application to lease DAS and the Regional Administrator approves the
lease request. The FW 42 final rule revised the introductory text of
the DAS Leasing Program regulations at Sec. 648.82(k)(3). However,
through an oversight in the regulatory text for that rule, the
regulations at Sec. 648.82(k)(3)(i) through (iii) were inadvertently
removed. These regulations include the DAS Leasing Program application
requirements and the authority of the Regional Administrator to approve
or disapprove DAS leasing applications. These provisions are necessary
to effectively administer the DAS Leasing Program. Therefore, this
action would reinsert the provisions at Sec. 648.82(k)(3)(i) through
(iii) that were inadvertently removed.
7. VMS Positional Polling Rates for U.S./Canada Management Area
For vessels required to use VMS, the current regulations specify
the minimum VMS positional polling rate. Vessels are responsible for
paying for such VMS positional polls. When the Council adopted measures
to include in Amendment 13, the Council did not specify a particular
VMS positional polling rate that vessels would be responsible for
paying for while fishing in the U.S./Canada Management Area. However,
the Amendment 13 final rule indicated that a vessel participating in
the U.S./Canada Management Area would be subject to a minimum VMS
position polling rate of two polls per hour at the vessel's expense.
NMFS, under the authority provided in section 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, included this increased polling rate with the intent to
facilitate and enhance the enforcement of area-specific management
provisions. While NMFS can request a vendor to temporarily increase the
VMS positional polling rate on individual vessels in any fishery at the
Agency's expense to facilitate enforcement operations, to date, NMFS
has not imposed the higher VMS positional polling rate on individual NE
multispecies trips into the U.S./Canada Management Area, which would be
at a participating vessel's expense, due to technical limitations.
Since implementing this requirement for vessels to pay for an
increased polling frequency, NMFS has determined that such a measure
should originate with the Council, similar to the way the Council
adopted the requirement for vessels to pay for a polling rate of two
VMS positional polls per hour for vessels participating in the Atlantic
sea scallop fishery. The VMS positional polling rate for which all
other vessels using VMS are required to pay for is one positional poll
per hour. Because the Council did not specifically recommend that NE
multispecies
[[Page 58625]]
vessels must pay for a higher VMS polling rate while fishing in the
U.S./Canada Management Area, NMFS has decided to remove the increased
VMS positional polling rate applicable to NE multispecies vessels.
Therefore, this action would remove references to an increased VMS
positional polling rate for vessels participating in the U.S./Canada
Management Area from the regulations at Sec. Sec. 648.9(c)(1)(ii),
648.10(b)(2)(iii), and 648.85(a)(3)(i).
8. Haddock Total Allowable Catch (TAC) in the Closed Area (CA) I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP
The CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP was first implemented by the FW 40-A
final rule, but was later modified by the rule implementing measures
approved under FW 41 to the FMP (September 14, 2005; 70 FR 54302). The
FW 41 final rule split the SAP into two seasons (one season for vessels
participating in an approved Sector and another season for non-Sector
vessels), with the haddock TAC distributed accordingly. The FW 42 final
rule further modified the manner in which the haddock TAC for this SAP
is calculated, but did not revise the season or the distribution of the
haddock TAC. The regulations implemented by the FW 42 final rule
included revisions to the manner in which the haddock TAC is
calculated, but inadvertently omitted the provisions that distributed
the haddock TAC among the two seasons, including the authority of the
Regional Administrator to adjust the quota to each season to account
for under- or over-harvest of the haddock TAC during the first season
of the SAP. Accordingly, the current regulations do not accurately
reflect the provisions adopted by the Council and implemented under the
FW 41 final rule. These provisions are necessary to administer this SAP
effectively. Therefore, this action would revise the regulations at
Sec. 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(F) to reinsert the FW 41 provisions that were
inadvertently removed.
9. White Hake Trip Limits
Early in the development of FW 42, the Council considered adopting
a 500-lb (226.8-kg) per DAS, up to 5,000-lb (2,268-kg) per trip, limit
for white hake. In order to implement the trip limits as soon as
possible while FW 42 was still being developed, NMFS implemented an
emergency rule establishing these trip limits. Subsequently, the
Council adopted a white hake trip limit of 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) per DAS,
up to 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) per trip in FW 42. The emergency rule was
modified on April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25094) to reflect the white hake trip
limit adopted by the Council in FW 42. However, both the FW 42 proposed
and final rules inadvertently included the lower white hake trip limit
included in the original emergency final rule. Therefore, this action
would correct the white hake trip limit found at Sec. 648.86(e) to
accurately reflect the white hake trip limit adopted by the Council in
FW 42.
10. Approval of Sector Applications
The procedure to review and approve sector allocations was first
established through the Amendment 13 final rule. Although the SEIS
prepared to support Amendment 13 did not specifically direct NMFS to
publish a proposed rule when reviewing sector applications and
operations plans, the Amendment 13 final rule included language that
required NMFS to seek public comment on proposed sector operations
plans through the publication of a proposed rule in the Federal
Register. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) allows agencies to
waive the requirement to publish a proposed rule and to provide for
public comment in limited circumstances. However, because the current
regulations require NMFS to develop a proposed rule for each sector,
NMFS must publish a proposed rule for sectors and does not have the
ability to take advantage of the provision in the APA that allows the
Assistant Administrator to waive proposed rulemaking should
circumstances allow. Based upon the existing procedures and associated
time lines, the requirement to develop a proposed rule may be too
inflexible and can unnecessarily delay the start of proposed sector
operations beyond the start of the fishing year on May 1. This can
create unnecessary adverse economic and social impacts for sector
participants, especially if the sector operations plans do not change
between fishing years. Therefore, this action would revise the existing
sector approval regulations at Sec. 648.87(c)(1) and (2) by removing
the requirement to develop a proposed rule, but indicating that sectors
would be approved consistent with applicable law.
11. Recreational Fish Size Restrictions
Although minimum fish size restrictions have been implemented since
the initial development of the FMP, the final rule implementing
measures approved under Amendment 5 (March 1, 1994; 59 FR 9872)
specified that the minimum fish sizes also apply to any fish or part of
a fish, including fillets. The Amendment 5 SEIS indicates that fish or
fish parts must have the skin on for the purposes of identification to
facilitate enforcement of the minimum size provisions. The SEIS only
provides one exception to this requirement, allowing commercial vessels
to retain up to 25 lb (11.3 kg) of fillets of legal-sized fish for
personal consumption. While not explicitly indicated, the intent of the
skin-on provision applies to groundfish caught by any vessel--
commercial, charter/party, or private recreational vessel.
The regulations implemented by the Amendment 5 final rule clearly
outline the minimum fish size provisions for commercial vessels at
Sec. 648.83, including the skin-on provision in paragraph (a)(2) of
that section. However, the recreational minimum fish size requirements
at Sec. 648.89 do not specifically include the skin-on provision.
Because the charter/party regulations at Sec. 648.89 do not
specifically indicate that the skin-on provisions applies to such
vessels, this action would add the skin-on provision outlined at Sec.
648.83(a)(2) at Sec. 648.89(b)(4).
12. Additional Corrections
In addition to the changes specified above, the following changes
to the regulations as amended by the final rule implementing FW 42 are
proposed to correct inaccurate references and to further clarify the
intent of FW 42 and previous actions. The changes listed below are in
the order in which they appear in the regulations.
In Sec. 648.4(c)(2)(iii)(A), the reference to the annual
designation as either a Day or Trip gillnet vessel at ``Sec.
648.82(k)'' would be corrected to read ``Sec. 648.82(j).''
In Sec. 648.14, the reference to ``Sec. 648.81(d)'' in paragraph
(a)(38) would be corrected to reference the transiting provision at
Sec. 648.81(i); the reference to ``Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(i)'' in
paragraph (a)(39) would be corrected to reference the transiting
provision at Sec. 648.81(i); the reference to ``Sec. 648.51(a)(2)(ii)
and (e)(2)'' in paragraph (a)(53) would be corrected to reference the
gear stowage provisions at Sec. 648.23(b); the reference to ``Sec.
648.85(b)(6)'' in paragraph (a)(153) would be corrected to read ``Sec.
648.85(b)(4);'' the reference to ``Sec. 648.86(g)(1)(i) or (g)(2)(i)''
in paragraph (b)(3) would be revised to read ``Sec. 648.86(g)(1),'' as
Sec. 648.86(g)(1)(i) and (g)(2) expired when the April 13, 2006,
emergency rule (71 FR 19348) was superceded by the FW 42 final rule;
the reference to ``Sec. 648.86(g)(1)(i) or (g)(2)(i)'' and ``Sec.
648.81(g)(1)(ii) and (g)(2)(ii)'' in paragraph (b)(4) would be
corrected to read ``Sec. 648.86(g)(1),'' as Sec. 648.86(g)(1)(i) and
(g)(2) expired when the April 13, 2006, emergency rule was superceded
by the FW 42 final rule; the
[[Page 58626]]
reference to ``Sec. 648.86(b)(1)(i)'' in paragraph (c)(24) would be
corrected to read ``Sec. 648.86(b)(1);'' and the reference to ``Sec.
648.86(b)(2)(ii) or (iii)'' in paragraph (c)(26) would be corrected to
read ``Sec. 648.86(b)(2).''
In Sec. 648.80(b)(2)(vi), the reference to ``(a)(11)(i)(A) and
(B)'' in the introductory text would be corrected to read
``(b)(11)(i)(A) and (B).''
In Sec. 648.82(e)(1), the reference to ``Sec. 648.10(c)(5)''
would be corrected to read ``Sec. 648.10.''
In Sec. 648.85, the reference to ``Sec. 648.94(b)(7)'' in
paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(D) would be revised to read ``Sec.
648.94(b)(3),'' as Sec. 648.94(b)(7) expired when the April 13, 2006,
emergency rule was superceded by the FW 42 final rule; and the
references to ``Sec. 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(G)'' in paragraph (b)(7)(iii),
(b)(7)(v)(D), and (b)(7)(vi)(D) would be corrected to read ``Sec.
648.85(b)(7)(iv)(F),'' as Sec. 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(G) expired when the
April 13, 2006, emergency rule was superceded by the FW 42 final rule.
In addition, reference to specific stock areas at Sec. 648.85(b)(6)(v)
would be added to Sec. 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(D) to clarify that the landing
limits specified in this paragraph apply to particular stock areas.
Further, reference to Sec. 648.10 would be inserted at Sec.
648.85(b)(7)(iv)(A) to clarify how DAS would be counted in the Closed
Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP. Finally, Sec. 648.85(b)(7)(vi)(G)
through (I) would be removed, as these paragraphs were included in the
April 13, 2006, emergency rule and expired when that rule was
superceded by the FW 42 final rule.
In Sec. 648.86(i), the references to ``Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(iv)''
and ``Sec. 648.85(a)(6)(iv)(D)'' would be corrected to read ``Sec.
648.85.''
In Sec. 648.92, paragraph (b)(2)(iii) would be deleted, as this
repeats the regulations at Sec. 648.92(b)(2)(ii) and is not necessary.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304 (b)(1)(A) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the Assistant Administrator for fisheries, NOAA, has
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the NE
Multispecies FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and
other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination is as follows:
The proposed allocation would correct/clarify the existing
regulations to ensure that the current regulations accurately
reflect measures adopted by the New England Fishery Management
Council and approved by the Secretary of Commerce. This action would
ensure that the economic impacts analyzed in previous actions would
be realized, but would not impose any additional economic impacts on
affected entities. The proposed action would not significantly
reduce profit for affected vessels, as the proposed measures are
either administrative in nature and would not affect vessel
operations, or would have no economic impact beyond that previously
analyzed. For example, FW 42 indicated that declarations of a
vessel's intended activity via VMS prior to each trip would cost
groundfish vessels approximately $0.50 per declaration, or about
$15,000 per year. In addition, Amendment 13 indicated that the U.S./
Canada Management Area gear requirements would cost participating
vessels $7,500 for a modified flounder net, or $747 to comply with
the haddock separator trawl requirement. This action would simply
clarify or reinstate such requirements, respectively, but would not
increase costs associated with these measures. Other measures
corrected or clarified by this action would ensure that unnecessary
costs, such as the costs for higher VMS positional polling rates,
are eliminated or that vessels would be able to fully realize the
economic benefits of special management programs by correctly
distributing the available haddock resources in the Closed Area I
Hook Gear Haddock SAP.
As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains a number of collection-of-information
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which have
been approved by OMB as follows:
1. VMS purchase and installation, OMB 0648-0202, (1 hr/
response);
2. VMS proof of installation, OMB 0648-0202, (1 hr/
response);
3. Automated VMS polling of vessel position, OMB 0648-
0202, (5 sec/response);
4. Area and DAS declarations via VMS, OMB 0648-0549 (5
min/response);
5. Standardized catch reporting requirements, OMB 0648-
0212 (15 min/response);
6. Sector manager daily reports for CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, OMB
0648-0212, (2 hr/response);
7. DAS Leasing Program application, OMB 0648-0202, (5
min/response);
8. Annual declaration to participate in the CA I Hook Gear Haddock
SAP, OMB 0648-0202, (2 min/response);
9. Sector allocation proposal, OMB 0648-0202, (50 hr/
response); and
10. Sector operations plan submission, OMB 0648-0202, (50
hr/response).
These estimates include the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
This action would not create new information collections or modify the
response time associated with any of the information collection
referenced above. Instead, this action would revise the regulations
underlying these information collections to correct inadvertent errors,
omissions, and ambiguities in the current regulations, as described in
the preamble. Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any
other aspect of this data collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to David--
Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting.
Dated: October 11, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 648.2, definitions for ``lessee,'' ``lessor,''
``transferee,'' and ``transferor'' are added, in alphabetical order, to
read as follows:
Sec. 648.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Lessee means a vessel owner who receives temporarily transferred NE
multispecies DAS from another vessel through the DAS Leasing Program
specified at Sec. 648.82(k).
Lessor means a vessel owner who temporarily transfers NE
multispecies DAS to another vessel through the DAS
[[Page 58627]]
Leasing Program specified at Sec. 648.82(k).
* * * * *
Transferee means a vessel owner who receives permanently
transferred NE multispecies DAS and potentially other permits from
another vessel through the DAS Transfer Program specified at Sec.
648.82(l).
Transferor means a vessel owner who permanently transfers NE
multispecies DAS and potentially other permits to another vessel
through the DAS Transfer Program specified at Sec. 648.82(l).
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 648.4, paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.4 Vessel permits.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) For vessels fishing for NE multispecies with gillnet gear, with
the exception of vessels fishing under the Small Vessel permit
category, an annual declaration as either a Day or Trip gillnet vessel
designation as described in Sec. 648.82(j). A vessel owner electing a
Day or Trip gillnet designation must indicate the number of gillnet
tags that he/she is requesting, and must include a check for the cost
of the tags. A permit holder letter will be sent to the owner of each
eligible gillnet vessel, informing him/her of the costs associated with
this tagging requirement and providing directions for obtaining tags.
Once a vessel owner has elected this designation, he/she may not change
the designation or fish under the other gillnet category for the
remainder of the fishing year. Incomplete applications, as described in
paragraph (e) of this section, will be considered incomplete for the
purpose of obtaining authorization to fish in the NE multispecies
gillnet fishery and will be processed without a gillnet authorization.
* * * * *
Sec. 648.9 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 648.9, remove and reserve paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
5. In Sec. 648.10, the introductory text of paragraph (b)(2), and
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) are revised; and paragraph (b)(5) is added to
read as follows:
Sec. 648.10 DAS and VMS notification requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) The owner of such a vessel specified in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section, with the exception of a vessel issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(vi) of this
section, must provide documentation to the Regional Administrator at
the time of application for a limited access permit that the vessel has
an operational VMS unit installed on board that meets the minimum
performance criteria, unless otherwise allowed under this paragraph
(b). If a vessel has already been issued a limited access permit
without the owner providing such documentation, the Regional
Administrator shall allow at least 30 days for the vessel to install an
operational VMS unit that meets the criteria and for the owner to
provide documentation of such installation to the Regional
Administrator. The owner of a vessel issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit that fishes or intends to fish under a Category A
or B DAS as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(vi) of this section must
provide documentation to the Regional Administrator that the vessel has
an operational VMS unit installed on board that meets those criteria
prior to fishing under a groundfish DAS. NMFS shall send letters to all
affected permit holders providing detailed information on the
procedures pertaining to VMS purchase, installation, and use.
* * * * *
(iii) DAS counting for a vessel that is under the VMS notification
requirements of this paragraph (b), with the exception of vessels that
have elected to fish exclusively in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on a
particular trip, as described in this paragraph (b), begins with the
first location signal received showing that the vessel crossed the VMS
Demarcation Line after leaving port. DAS counting ends with the first
location signal received showing that the vessel crossed the VMS
Demarcation Line upon its return to port. For those vessels that have
elected to fish exclusively in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area pursuant to
Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(ii), the requirements of this paragraph (b) begin
with the first location signal received showing that the vessel crossed
into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area and end with the first location
signal received showing that the vessel crossed out of the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area upon beginning its return trip to port, unless the
vessel elects to also fish outside the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the
same trip, in accordance with Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A).
* * * * *
(5) VMS notification requirements for other fisheries. Unless
otherwise specified in this part, or via letters sent to affected
permit holders under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the owner or
authorized representative of a vessel that is required to use VMS, as
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, must notify the Regional
Administrator of the vessel's intended fishing activity by entering the
appropriate VMS code prior to leaving port at the start of each fishing
trip. Notification of a vessel's intended fishing activity includes,
but is not limited to, gear and DAS type to be used; area to be fished;
and whether the vessel will be declared out of the DAS fishery, or will
participate in the NE multispecies and monkfish DAS fisheries,
including approved special management programs. A vessel cannot change
any aspect of its VMS activity code outside of port, except that NE
multispecies vessels are authorized to change the category of DAS used
(i.e., flip its DAS), as provided at Sec. 648.85(b), or change the
area declared to be fished so that the vessel may fish both inside and
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the same trip, as provided
at Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A). VMS activity codes and declaration
instructions are available from the Regional Administrator upon
request.
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 648.14, paragraphs (a)(35), (a)(38), (a)(39), (a)(43),
(a)(53), (a)(153), (b)(3), (b)(4), (c)(24), and (c)(26) are revised and
paragraph (a)(78) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
(a) * * *
(35) Fish with, use, or have on board, within the areas described
in Sec. 648.80(a)(1) and (2), nets with mesh size smaller than the
minimum mesh size specified in Sec. 648.80(a)(3) and (4), except as
provided in Sec. 648.80(a)(5) through (8), (a)(9), (a)(10), (a)(15),
(a)(16), (d), (e), and (i), unless the vessel has not been issued a NE
multispecies permit and fishes for NE multispecies exclusively in state
waters, or unless otherwise specified in Sec. 648.17.
* * * * *
(38) Enter or be in the area described in Sec. 648.81(a)(1) on a
fishing vessel, except as provided in Sec. 648.81(a)(2) and (i).
(39) Enter or be in the area described in Sec. 648.81(b)(1) on a
fishing vessel, except as provided in Sec. 648.81(b)(2) and (i).
* * * * *
(43) Violate any of the provisions of Sec. 648.80, including
paragraphs (a)(5), the Small-mesh Northern Shrimp Fishery Exemption
Area; (a)(6), the Cultivator Shoal Whiting Fishery Exemption Area;
(a)(9), Small-mesh Area 1/Small-mesh Area 2; (a)(10), the
[[Page 58628]]
Nantucket Shoals Dogfish Fishery Exemption Area; (a)(11), the GOM
Scallop Dredge Exemption Area; (a)(12), the Nantucket Shoals Mussel and
Sea Urchin Dredge Exemption Area; (a)(13), the GOM/GB Monkfish Gillnet
Exemption Area; (a)(14), the GOM/GB Dogfish Gillnet Exemption Area;
(a)(15), the Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery; (a)(16)
the GOM Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery; (a)(18),
the Great South Channel Scallop Dredge Exemption Area; (b)(3),
exemptions (small mesh); (b)(5); the SNE Monkfish and Skate Trawl
Exemption Area; (b)(6), the SNE Monkfish and Skate Gillnet Exemption
Area; (b)(8), the SNE Mussel and Sea Urchin Dredge Exemption Area;
(b)(9), the SNE Little Tunny Gillnet Exemption Area; and (b)(11), the
SNE Scallop Dredge Exemption Area. Each violation of any provision in
Sec. 648.80 constitutes a separate violation.
* * * * *
(53) Possess, land, or fish for regulated species, except winter
flounder as provided for in accordance with Sec. 648.80(i) from or
within the areas described in Sec. 648.80(i), while in possession of
scallop dredge gear on a vessel not fishing under the scallop DAS
program as described in Sec. 648.53, or fishing under a general
scallop permit, unless the vessel and the dredge gear conform with the
stowage requirements of Sec. 648.23(b), or unless the vessel has not
been issued a multispecies permit and fishes for NE multispecies
exclusively in state waters.
* * * * *
(78) Violate any provision of an in-season action to adjust trip
limits, gear usage, season, area access and/or closure, or any other
measure authorized by this part.
* * * * *
(153) If fishing under the SNE/MA Winter Flounder SAP, described in
Sec. 648.85(b)(4), fail to comply with the restrictions and conditions
under Sec. 648.85(b)(4)(i) through (iv).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) While fishing in the areas specified in Sec. 648.86(g)(1),
with a NE multispecies Handgear A permit, or under the NE multispecies
DAS program, or under the limited access monkfish Category C or D
permit provisions, possess yellowtail flounder in excess of the limits
specified under Sec. 648.86(g)(1), unless fishing under the
recreational or charter/party regulations, or transiting in accordance
with Sec. 648.23(b).
(4) If fishing in the areas specified in Sec. 648.86(g)(1) with a
NE multispecies Handgear A permit, or under the NE multispecies DAS
program, or under the limited access monkfish Category C or D permit
provisions, fail to comply with the requirements specified in Sec.
648.81(g)(1).
(c) * * *
(24) Enter port, while on a NE multispecies DAS trip, in possession
of more than the allowable limit of cod specified in Sec.
648.86(b)(1), unless the vessel is fishing under the cod exemption
specified in Sec. 648.86(b)(4).
* * * * *
(26) Enter port, while on a NE multispecies DAS trip, in possession
of more than the allowable limit of cod specified in Sec.
648.86(b)(2).
* * * * *
7. In Sec. 648.80, paragraph (b)(2)(vi) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.80 NE multispecies regulated mesh areas and restrictions on
gear and methods of fishing.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) Other restrictions and exemptions. Vessels are prohibited from
fishing in the SNE Exemption Area, as defined in paragraph (b)(10) of
this section, except if fishing with exempted gear (as defined under
this part) or under the exemptions specified in paragraphs (b)(3),
(b)(5) through (9), (b)(11), (c), (e), (h), and (i) of this section, or
if fishing under a NE multispecies DAS, if fishing under the Small
Vessel or Handgear A exemptions specified in Sec. 648.82(b)(5) and
(b)(6), respectively, or if fishing under a scallop state waters
exemption specified in Sec. 648.54, or if fishing under a scallop DAS
in accordance with paragraph (h) of this section, or if fishing under a
General Category scallop permit in accordance with paragraphs
(b)(11)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, or if fishing pursuant to a NE
multispecies open access Charter/Party or Handgear permit, or if
fishing as a charter/party or private recreational vessel in compliance
with the regulations specified in Sec. 648.89. Any gear on a vessel,
or used by a vessel, in this area must be authorized under one of these
exemptions or must be stowed as specified in Sec. 648.23(b).
* * * * *
Sec. 648.81 [Amended]
8. In Sec. 648.81, remove paragraph (g)(2)(iv).
9. In Sec. 648.82, paragraph (e)(1) is revised and paragraphs
(k)(3)(i) through (iii) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.82 Effort-control program for NE multispecies limited access
vessels.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) DAS shall accrue to the nearest minute and, with the exceptions
described under this paragraph (e) and paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this
section, shall be counted as actual time called, or logged into the DAS
program, consistent with the DAS notification requirements specified at
Sec. 648.10.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Application information requirements. An application to lease
Category A DAS must contain the following information: Lessor's owner
name, vessel name, permit number and official number or state
registration number; Lessee's owner name, vessel name, permit number
and official number or state registration number; number of NE
multispecies DAS to be leased; total priced paid for leased DAS;
signatures of Lessor and Lessee; and date form was completed.
Information obtained from the lease application will be held
confidential, according to applicable Federal law. Aggregate data may
be used in the analysis of the DAS Leasing Program.
(ii) Approval of lease application. Unless an application to lease
Category A DAS is denied according to paragraph (k)(3)(iii) of this
section, the Regional Administrator shall issue confirmation of
application approval to both Lessor and Lessee within 45 days of
receipt of an application.
(iii) Denial of lease application. The Regional Administrator may
deny an application to lease Category A DAS for any of the following
reasons, including, but not limited to: The application is incomplete
or submitted past the March 1 deadline; the Lessor or Lessee has not
been issued a valid limited access NE multispecies permit or is
otherwise not eligible; the Lessor's or Lessee's DAS are under sanction
pursuant to an enforcement proceeding; the Lessor's or Lessee's vessel
is prohibited from fishing; the Lessor's or Lessee's limited access NE
multispecies permit is sanctioned pursuant to an enforcement
proceeding; the Lessor or Lessee vessel is determined not in compliance
with the conditions, restrictions, and requirements of this part; or
the Lessor has an insufficient number of allocated or unused DAS
available to lease. Upon denial of an application to lease NE
multispecies DAS, the Regional Administrator shall send a letter to the
applicants describing the reason(s) for application rejection. The
decision by
[[Page 58629]]
the Regional Administrator is the final agency decision.
* * * * *
10. In Sec. 648.85, paragraphs (b)(7)(vi)(G) through (I) are
removed, and paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (b)(6)(iv)(D), (b)(7)(iii),
(b)(7)(iv)(A) and (F), (b)(7)(v)(D), and (b)(7)(vi)(D) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 648.85 Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) VMS requirement. A NE multispecies DAS vessel in the U.S./
Canada Management Areas described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section
must have installed on board an operational VMS unit that meets the
minimum performance criteria specified in Sec. Sec. 648.9 and 648.10.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) * * *
(D) Landing limits. Unless otherwise specified in this paragraph
(b)(6)(iv)(D), a NE multispecies vessel fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program described in this paragraph (b)(6), and fishing under a Regular
B DAS, may not land more than 100 lb (45.5 kg) per DAS, or any part of
a DAS, up to a maximum of 1,000 lb (454 kg) per trip, of any of the
following species/stocks from the areas specified in paragraph
(b)(6)(v) of this section: Cod, American plaice, white hake, witch
flounder, SNE/MA winter flounder, GB winter flounder, GB yellowtail
flounder, southern windowpane flounder, and ocean pout; and may not
land more than 25 lb (11.3 kg) per DAS, or any part of a DAS, up to a
maximum of 250 lb (113 kg) per trip of CC/GOM or SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder. In addition, trawl vessels, which are required to fish with a
haddock separator trawl as specified under paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J) of
this section, and other gear that may be required in order to reduce
catches of stocks of concern as described under paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)
of this section, are restricted to the following trip limits: 500 lb
(227 kg) of all flatfish species (American plaice, witch flounder,
winter flounder, windowpane flounder, and GB yellowtail flounder),
combined; 500 lb (227 kg) of monkfish (whole weight); 500 lb (227 kg)
of skates (whole weight); and zero possession of lobsters, unless
otherwise restricted by Sec. 648.94(b)(3).
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(iii) Season. The overall season for the CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP
is October 1 through December 31, which is divided into two
participation periods, one for Sector and one for non-Sector vessels.
For the 2005 fishing year, the only participation period in which
eligible Sector vessels may fish in the CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP is
from October 1 through November 15. For the 2005 fishing year, the only
participation period in which eligible non-Sector vessels may fish in
the SAP is from November 16 through December 31. For the 2006 fishing
year and beyond, these participation periods shall alternate between
Sector and non-Sector vessels such that, in fishing year 2006, the
participation period for non-Sector vessels is October 1 through
November 15, and the participation period for Sector vessels is
November 16 through December 31. The Regional Administrator may adjust
the start date of the second participation period prior to November 16
if the haddock TAC for the first participation period specified in
paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F) of this section is harvested prior to November
15.
(iv) * * *
(A) DAS use restrictions. A vessel fishing in the CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP may not initiate a DAS flip. A vessel is prohibited from
fishing in the CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP while making a trip under the
Regular B DAS Pilot Program described under paragraph (b)(6) of this
section. DAS will be charged as described in Sec. 648.10.
* * * * *
(F) Haddock TAC--(1) Allocation and distribution. The maximum total
amount of haddock that may be caught (landings and discards) in the
Closed Area I Hook Gear SAP Area in any fishing year is based upon the
size of the TAC allocated for the 2004 fishing year (1,130 mt live
weight), adjusted according to the growth or decline of the western GB
(WGB) haddock exploitable biomass (in relationship to its size in
2004), according to the following formula: BiomassYEAR!X=
(1,130 mt live weight) x (Projected WGB Haddock
ExploitableBiomassYEAR!X/WGB Haddock Exploitable
Biomass2004). The size of the western component of the stock
is considered to be 35 percent of the total stock size, unless modified
by a stock assessment. The maximum amount of haddock that may be caught
in this SAP during each fishing year is divided evenly between the two
participation periods of October 1 - November 15 and November 16 -
December 31, as specified in paragraph (b)(7)(iii) of this section. The
Regional Administrator shall specify the haddock TAC for the SAP, in a
manner consistent with applicable law.
(2) Adjustments to the haddock TAC. The Regional Administrator may
adjust the portion of the haddock TAC specified for the second
participation period to account for under- or over-harvest of the
portion of the haddock TAC (landings and discards) that was harvested
during the first participation period, not to exceed the overall
haddock TAC specified in this paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F).
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(D) Reporting requirements. The owner or operator of a Sector
vessel declared into the Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP must
submit reports to the Sector Manager, with instructions to be provided
by the Sector Manager, for each day fished in the Closed Area I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP Area. The Sector Manager shall provide daily reports
to NMFS, including at least the following information: Total pounds of
haddock, cod, yellowtail flounder, winter flounder, witch flounder,
American plaice, and white hake kept; total pounds of haddock, cod,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder, witch flounder, American plaice,
and white hake discarded; date fish were caught; and VTR serial number,
as instructed by the Regional Administrator. Daily reporting must
continue even if the vessel operator is required to exit the SAP as
required under paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F) of this section.
* * * * *
(vi) * * *
(D) Reporting requirements. The owner or operator of a non-Sector
vessel declared into the Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP must
submit reports via VMS, in accordance with instructions to be provided
by the Regional Administrator, for each day fished in the Closed Area I
Hook Gear Haddock SAP Area. The reports must be submitted in 24-hr
intervals for each day fished, beginning at 0000 hr local time and
ending at 2400 hr local time. The reports must be submitted by 0900 hr
local time of the day following fishing. The reports must include at
least the following information: Total pounds of haddock, cod,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder, witch flounder, American plaice,
and white hake kept; total pounds of haddock, cod, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder, American plaice, and white hake
discarded; date fish were caught; and VTR serial number, as instructed
by the Regional Administrator. Daily reporting must continue even if
the vessel operator is required to exit the SAP as required
[[Page 58630]]
under paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(F) of this section.
* * * * *
11. In Sec. 648.86, paragraphs (e) and (i) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.86 NE Multispecies possession restrictions.
* * * * *
(e) White hake. Unless otherwise restricted under this part, a
vessel issued a NE multispecies DAS permit, a limited access Handgear A
permit, an open access Handgear B permit, or a monkfish limited access
permit and fishing under the monkfish Category C or D permit provisions
may land up to 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of white hake per DAS, or any part
of a DAS, up to 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) per trip.
* * * * *
(i) Offloading requirement for vessels possessing species regulated
by a daily possession limit. Vessels that have ended a trip as
specified in Sec. 648.10(b)(2)(iii) or (c)(3) that possess on board
species regulated by a daily possession limit (i.e., pounds per DAS),
as specified at Sec. 648.85 or Sec. 648.86, must offload these
species prior to leaving port on a subsequent trip. Other species
regulated by an overall trip limit may be retained on board for a
subsequent trip. For example, a vessel that possesses cod and winter
flounder harvested from Georges Bank is subject to a daily possession
limit for cod of 1,000 lb (453 kg)/DAS and an overall trip limit of
5,000 lb (2,267 kg)/trip for winter flounder. In this example, the
vessel would be required to offload any cod harvested, but may retain
on board winter flounder up to the maximum trip limit prior to leaving
port and crossing the VMS demarcation line to begin a subsequent trip.
* * * * *
12. In Sec. 648.87, paragraphs (b)(1)(ix), (b)(1)(xv) and (xvi),
(b)(2)(x), and (c) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.87 Sector allocation.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ix) Unless exempted through a Letter of Authorization specified in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, each vessel operator and/or vessel
owner fishing under an approved Sector must comply with all NE
multispecies management measures of this part and other applicable law.
Each vessel and vessel operator and/or vessel owner participating in a
Sector must also comply with all applicable requirements and conditions
of the Operating Plan specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section and
the Letter of Authorization issued pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this
section. It shall be unlawful to violate any such conditions and
requirements and each Sector, vessel, and vessel operator and/or vessel
owner participating in the Sector may be charged jointly and severally
for civil penalties and permit sanctions pursuant 15 CFR part 904.
* * * * *
(xv) All vessel operators and/or vessel owners fishing in an
approved Sector must be issued and have on board the vessel, a Letter
of Authorization (LOA) issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service
pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
(xvi) The Regional Administrator may exempt participants in the
Sector, pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, from any Federal
fishing regulations necessary to allow such participants to fish in
accordance with the Operations Plan, with the exception of regulations
addressing the following measures for Sectors based on a hard TAC:
Year-round closure areas, permitting restrictions (e.g., vessel
upgrades, etc.), gear restrictions designed to minimize habitat impacts
(e.g., roller gear restrictions, etc.), and reporting requirements (not
including DAS reporting requirements). A framework adjustment, as
specified in Sec. 648.90, may be submitted to exempt Sector
participants from regulations not authorized to be exempted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(x) Each vessel and vessel operator and/or vessel owner
participating in a Sector must comply with all applicable requirements
and conditions of the Operations Plan specified in this paragraph
(b)(2) and the Letter of Authorization issued pursuant to paragraph
(c)(2) of this section. It shall be unlawful to violate any such
conditions and requirements unless such conditions or restrictions are
identified as administrative only in an approved Operations Plan. Each
Sector, vessel, and vessel operator and/or vessel owner participating
in the Sector may be charged jointly and severally for civil penalties
and permit sanctions pursuant to 15 CFR part 904.
(c) Approval of a Sector and granting of exemptions by the Regional
Administrator. (1) Once the submission documents specified under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(2) of this section have been determined to
comply with the requirements of this section, NMFS may consult with the
Council and shall approve or disapprove Sector operations consistent
with applicable law.
(2) If a Sector is approved, the Regional Administrator shall issue
a Letter of Authorization to each vessel operator and/or vessel owner
belonging to the Sector. The Letter of Authorization shall authorize
participation in the Sector operations and may exempt participating
vessels from any Federal fishing regulation, except those specified in
paragraph (b)(1)(xvi) of this section, in order to allow vessels to
fish in accordance with an approved Operations Plan, provided such
exemptions are consistent with the goals and objectives of the NE
Multispecies FMP. The Letter of Authorization may also include
requirements and conditions deemed necessary to ensure effective
administration of, and compliance with, the Operations Plan and the
Sector allocation. Solicitation of public comment on, and NMFS final
determination on such exemptions shall be consistent with paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) of this section.
(3) The Regional Administrator may withdraw approval of a Sector,
after consultation with the Council, at any time if it is determined
that Sector participants are not complying with the requirements of an
approved Operations Plan or that the continuation of the Operations
Plan will undermine achievement of fishing mortality objectives of the
NE Multispecies FMP. Withdrawal of approval of a Sector may only be
done after notice and comment rulemaking consistent with applicable
law.
* * * * *
13. In Sec. 648.89, paragraph (b)(4) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.89 Recreational and charter/party vessel restrictions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) The minimum fish size applies to whole fish or to any part of a
fish while possessed on board either a charter/party or a private
recreational vessel. Fish fillets, or parts of fish, must have skin on
while possessed on board a vessel and at the time of landing in order
to meet minimum size requirements. ``Skin on'' means the entire portion
of the skin normally attached to the portion of the fish or to fish
parts possessed is still attached.
* * * * *
Sec. 648.92 [Amended]
14. In Sec. 648.92, remove paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
[FR Doc. E7-20386 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S