Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Regulations-Disposition of Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains, 58582-58590 [E7-20209]
Download as PDF
58582
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
and to adjust applicable deadlines.
Therefore, EPA did not consider the use
of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. This action merely
proposes to determine that the Memphis
TN–AR Nonattainment Area has not
attained by its applicable attainment
date, and to reclassify the Memphis TN–
AR Nonattainment Area as a moderate
ozone nonattainment area and to adjust
applicable deadlines.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: September 24, 2007.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E7–20390 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 10
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
RIN 1024–AD68
Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Act Regulations—
Disposition of Culturally Unidentifiable
Human Remains
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Proposed rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
You may submit comments,
identified by the number RIN 1024–
AD68, by any of the following methods:
ADDRESSES:
—Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
—Mail to: Dr. Sherry Hutt, Manager,
National NAGPRA Program, National
Park Service, Docket No. 1024–AC84,
1849 C Street, NW., (2253),
Washington, DC 20240.
—Hand deliver to: Dr. Sherry Hutt, 1201
Eye Street, NW., 8th floor,
Washington, DC.
Dr.
Sherry Hutt, Manager, National
NAGPRA Program, National Park
Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW., 8th floor,
Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202)
354–1479, facsimile (202) 371–5197.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Authority
Dated: October 9, 2007.
Russell L. Wright, Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
ACTION:
Written comments will be
accepted through January 14, 2008.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule specifies
procedures for the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains in the possession or control of
museums or Federal agencies, thus
implementing the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
of 1990 (Act). Publication of this
document is intended to solicit
comments from Indian tribes, Native
Hawaiian organizations, museums,
Federal agencies, and members of the
public before its publication as a final
rule.
Sections 8(c)(5) and (c)(7) of the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (Act) (25 U.S.C. 3001 et
seq.) gives the Review Committee the
responsibility for recommending
specific actions for developing a process
for disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and
consulting with the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) in the development
of regulations to carry out the Act.
Section 13 charges the Secretary with
promulgating regulations to carry out
the Act. Section 5(1) of the
Archaeological Resources Protection Act
(16 U.S.C. 470aa–mm) authorizes the
Secretary to promulgate regulations
providing for the ultimate disposition of
archaeological resources and other
resources removed under the Act of
June 27, 1960 (the Reservoir Salvage
Act, as amended, also known as the
Archeological and Historic Preservation
Act of 1974, 16 U.S.C. 469–469c–1) or
the Act of June 8, 1906 (the Antiquities
Act of 1906, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 431–
433).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Background
On November 16, 1990, President
George Bush signed into law the Native
American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act. The Act addresses the
rights of lineal descendants, Indian
tribes, and Native Hawaiian
organizations to certain Native
American human remains, funerary
objects, sacred objects, and objects of
cultural patrimony. Section 8 of the Act
established the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Review
Committee of seven private citizens to
monitor and review implementation of
the inventory and identification process
and repatriation activities required
under the Act. Section 8(c)(5) charged
the Review Committee with compiling
an inventory of culturally unidentifiable
human remains that are in the
possession or control of museums or
Federal agencies and recommending
specific actions for developing a process
for disposition of such remains. The
inventory of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and recommendations
regarding their disposition relate only to
human remains in the possession or
control of museums and Federal
agencies and not to human remains that
are excavated or removed from Federal
or tribal lands after November 16, 1990
under section 3 of the Act.
Current regulations implementing the
Act require museums and Federal
agencies to retain possession of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains until final regulations are
promulgated or the Secretary
recommends otherwise. The disposition
of funerary objects associated with
culturally unidentifiable human
remains is not specifically addressed in
the Act. During deliberations over
recommendations regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains, the Review Committee
considered the intrinsic relationship of
human remains to associated funerary
objects and concluded that nothing in
the Act precludes the voluntary
disposition of these cultural items by
museums or Federal agencies to the
extent allowable by Federal law.
In 1994, the Review Committee began
to formally solicit comments from
Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian
organizations, museums, and Federal
agencies regarding the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains. The Review Committee
developed its first draft of
recommendations regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary
objects in February 1995. These draft
recommendations were published for
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
public comment in the Federal Register
(60 FR 32163, June 20, 1995). Copies of
the draft were sent to over 3,000 Indian
tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations,
museums, Federal agencies, national
museum and scientific organizations,
and members of the public. One
hundred and twenty-nine written
comments were received during the
100-day comment period, representing
16 Indian tribes, 49 museums, 12
Federal agencies, 3 national museum
and scientific organizations, and 58
members of the public.
Based on the comments received, a
revised draft of recommendations
regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects was
developed in June 1996. The revised
draft recommendations were published
for public comment in the Federal
Register (61 FR 43071, August 20,
1996). Copies of the draft were sent to
over 3,000 Indian tribes, Native
Hawaiian organizations, museums,
Federal agencies, national museum and
scientific organizations, and members of
the public. Forty-nine written comments
were received during the 45-day
comment period, representing 4 Indian
tribes, 26 museums, 4 Federal agencies,
6 national museum and scientific
organizations, and 11 members of the
public.
In June 1998, the Review Committee
developed draft principles of agreement
regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains. The
draft principles of agreement were
published for public comment in the
Federal Register on two different
occasions (64 FR 33502, June 23, 1999
and 64 FR 41135, July 29, 1999). Copies
of the draft were sent to over 3,000
Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian
organizations, museums, Federal
agencies, national museum and
scientific organizations, and members of
the public. Eighty-nine written
comments were received during the 70day comment period, representing 13
Indian tribes, 39 museums, 4 Federal
agencies, 5 national museum and
scientific organizations, and 22
members of the public.
While the Review Committee
developed the draft of general
recommendations, a separate procedure
was developed for consideration of caseby-case requests for disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and associated funerary objects
based on a recommendation from the
Secretary [43 CFR 10.9(e)(6)]. Forty-one
case-by-case requests were received and
all were referred to the Review
Committee for consideration. Twentysix requests were made by museums
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
and 15 requests were made by Federal
agencies. The Review Committee
considered each request as part of its
regular meeting agenda and
recommendations were referred to the
National Park Service for action.
Responses to each requesting museum
or Federal agency were signed by a
representative of the Secretary as
required by § 10.9(e)(6).
Of the 41 requests, the Secretary’s
representative recommended
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains in 33 cases. Nine of the
33 recommended dispositions were to
Indian tribes based on the recognition of
their aboriginal occupation of the area
in which the human remains and
associated funerary objects were
recovered, 8 were to coalitions
including federally recognized Indian
tribes, 11 were to non-federally
recognized Indian groups, and 5 were to
be completed according to applicable
State law.
Eleven of the 33 recommended
dispositions also included funerary
objects that were associated with the
culturally unidentifiable human
remains. In response to one of the
requests, the representative of the
Secretary provided a recommendation
on February 7, 2000 that stated ‘‘the
statutory language neither requires nor
precludes the committee from making
recommendations regarding the
disposition of funerary objects
associated with culturally unidentifiable
human remains. While regulatory
provisions require museums or federal
agencies to retain possession of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains until final regulations are
promulgated or the Secretary
recommends otherwise, these
provisions do not apply to associated
funerary objects. A museum may choose
to repatriate such items. However, a
Notice of Inventory Completion must be
published in the Federal Register before
the disposition.’’
Of the 41 requests made regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains, in eight cases the
Secretary’s representative recommended
that the culturally unidentifiable human
remains be retained pending completion
of the inventory required under 43 CFR
10.9.
After circulating three drafts for
public comment and considering the
specific case-by-case requests, the
Review Committee developed its final
recommendations regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains in May 2000. The
recommendations were published on
June 8, 2000 (65 FR 36462).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58583
The Review Committee recognized
that the legislative intent of the Act is
expressed by its title: the protection of
Native American graves and repatriation
[of Native American cultural items].
Specifically, the Review Committee
found that the Act requires (1) the
disposition of all Native American
human remains and cultural items
excavated on or removed from Federal
lands after November 16, 1990, with
disposition based on linkages of lineal
descent, tribal land, cultural affiliation,
or aboriginal land; (2) the repatriation of
culturally affiliated human remains and
associated funerary objects in Federal
agency and museum collections, if
requested by a culturally affiliated
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization, with repatriation based on
linkages of lineal descent or cultural
affiliation; and (3) the development of
regulations for the disposition of
unclaimed human remains and objects
and culturally unidentifiable human
remains in Federal agency and museum
collections. Although the treatment of
funerary objects associated with
culturally unidentifiable human
remains is not addressed in the Act, the
Review Committee recognized that the
Act does not prohibit the voluntary
repatriation of these cultural items by
museums or Federal agencies to the
extent allowed by Federal law.
Museums or Federal agencies must
determine whether Native American
human remains in their control are
related to lineal descendants, culturally
affiliated with a present-day federally
recognized Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization, or are culturally
unidentifiable. This determination must
be made in consultation with all
appropriate Indian tribes or Native
Hawaiian organizations, as described in
43 CFR 10.9(b), and through a good faith
evaluation of all relevant and available
documentation. A determination that
human remains are culturally
unidentifiable may change to a
determination of cultural affiliation as
additional information becomes
available through ongoing consultation
or any other source. The Review
Committee finds no statute of
limitations in the Act for lineal
descendants, Indian tribes, or Native
Hawaiian organizations to make a claim,
and a museum or Federal agency’s
determination that human remains are
culturally unidentifiable may occur for
different reasons.
Categories of Culturally Unidentifiable
Human Remains
The Review Committee’s
recommendations identified three
categories of culturally unidentifiable
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
58584
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
human remains: (1) those for which
cultural affiliation could be determined
but that the appropriate Native
American group is not federally
recognized as an Indian tribe; (2) those
that represent an identifiable earlier
group, but for which no present-day
Indian tribe has been identified by the
museum or Federal agency; and (3)
those for which the museum or Federal
agency believes that evidence is
insufficient to identify an earlier group.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Documentation
Documentation is required for
inventory completion and
determinations of cultural affiliation by
museums or Federal agencies and
should be prepared in accordance with
the standards outlined in 43 CFR 10.9(c)
and 10.14. Documentation must occur
within the context of the consultation
process. The Review Committee
proposed that additional study of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and associated funerary objects
is not prohibited if the appropriate
parties in consultation agree that such
study is appropriate. The Review
Committee confirmed that once
inventories have been completed, the
Act may not be used to require new
scientific studies or other means of
acquiring or preserving additional
scientific information from human
remains and associated funerary objects.
Disposition
The Review Committee proposed
three guidelines for the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains.
1. Respect must be the foundation for
any disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains. Human
remains determined to be culturally
unidentifiable are no less deserving of
respect than those for which cultural
affiliation has been established.
2. Because there may be different
reasons for human remains being
unclaimed or determined to be
culturally unidentifiable, there may be
more than one appropriate disposition
solution. Examples of appropriate
disposition solutions include the return
of human remains that are determined
to be culturally unidentifiable that were
removed from tribal land; human
remains that are determined to be
culturally unidentifiable that were
recovered from the aboriginal land of an
Indian tribe; or human remains that are
culturally unidentifiable but for which
there is a relationship of shared group
identity with a non-federally recognized
Native American group.
3. A museum or Federal agency may
also seek the recommendation of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
Review Committee for the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains based on criteria other than
those listed above.
The Review Committee proposed two
models for determining the disposition
of culturally unidentifiable human
remains. The first model involved the
joint recommendations by claimants
and museums or Federal agencies.
Disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains may proceed in those
cases where all the relevant parties have
agreed in writing that the inventory
requirements have been met and that
the Review Committee’s guidelines for
respectful treatment, recognition of
alternative disposition solutions, and
the use of the Review Committee for
disposition recommendations have been
followed. The Review Committee noted
that it had already recommended
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains in cases that met the
three guidelines.
The second model involved the joint
recommendations of regional consortia.
The Review Committee recognized that
historical and cultural factors, and
therefore issues concerning the
definition and disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains, vary
significantly across the United States.
Therefore, the Review Committee
recommended that regional solutions be
developed that would best fit regional
circumstances. The Review Committee
recommended a process in which
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations define regions within
which the most appropriate solutions
for disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains might be
determined. Within each region, the
appropriate Federal agencies, museums,
Indian tribes, and Native Hawaiian
organizations would consult together
and propose a framework and schedule
to develop and implement the most
appropriate model for their region.
Dispositions agreed upon through
regional consultation meetings would be
made by the appropriate Federal
agencies, museums, and Indian tribes. If
a disposition agreement could not be
reached through regional consultation
meetings, the matter could be brought
before the Review Committee. Any
proposed regional disposition
agreement would have to meet the
Review Committee’s three guidelines for
disposition.
Federal agencies. The scope of this
inventory was expanded to include both
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and funerary objects with
which they are associated by
§ 10.9(d)(2).
The Review Committee’s inventory
summarizes information provided by
museums or Federal agencies in their
inventories. This includes:
1. The number of human remains and
associated funerary objects under their
control;
2. State and county from which the
human remains and associated funerary
objects were removed;
3. The earlier group to which the
human remains and associated funerary
objects are thought to have belonged;
4. The date range during which the
human remains and associated funerary
objects are thought to have been
originally interred; and
5. The date when custody of the
human remains and associated funerary
objects was either transferred to an
Indian tribe, Native Hawaiian
organization, or non-federally
recognized Indian group or they were
reinterred.
Section 8(g)(2) of the Act requires the
Secretary to provide reasonable
administrative and staff support
necessary for the deliberations of the
Review Committee. One of those duties
has been compilation of the Review
Committee’s inventory of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects. The Review
Committee’s inventory was compiled
from the inventories submitted by
museums or Federal agencies under 43
CFR 10.9(e)(6). Each museum and
Federal agency had an opportunity to
verify the Review Committee’s
inventory of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary
objects from their institution for
verification before submission of the
final inventory to the Review
Committee. The Review Committee’s
inventory is posted at https://
www.cr.nps.gov/nagpra/onlinedb/
index.htm and presently includes
information on 118,348 human remains
and 846,187 associated funerary objects
from 614 museums or Federal agencies.
Inventory
Section 8(c)(5) of the Act directs the
Review Committee to compile an
inventory of culturally unidentifiable
human remains that are in the
possession or control of museums or
Paragraph 10.1(b)(3) provides
clarification to Federal agencies as to
when a determination constitutes final
agency action as used in the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
704).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 10.1 Purpose and
Applicability
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Section 10.2
Definitions
Section 10.2 provides definitions of
terms used throughout Part 10.
Paragraph 10.2(e) provides additional
clarification to the definition of cultural
affiliation. Human remains and
associated funerary objects in museum
or Federal agency collections for which
no lineal descendant or culturally
affiliated Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization was determined
are referred to as culturally
unidentifiable.
Paragraph 10.2(g)(5) provides a
definition of disposition and identifies
procedures to effectuate this process in
various situations.
Section 10.9
Inventories
Paragraph 10.9(e)(2) details the
contents of notices of inventory
completion. Additional text to clarify
that such notices include information
regarding culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary
objects to be transferred or reinterred
under 43 CFR 10.11 is proposed for
addition.
Paragraph 10.9(e)(5) directs museums
or Federal agencies to supply additional
available documentation upon the
request of an Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization. Additional text
to clarify that such documentation shall
be considered a public record subject to
disclosure except when exempted under
applicable law, such as the Freedom of
Information Act and the Privacy Act, is
proposed for addition. Further, as
required by section 5(B)(2) (Inventory
For Human Remains and Associated
Funerary Objects) of the Act, neither a
request for such documentation nor any
provisions of the regulations shall be
construed as authorizing the initiation
of new scientific studies of such human
remains and associated funerary objects
or other means of acquiring or
preserving additional scientific
information from such remains and
objects.
Paragraph 10.9(e)(6) is rewritten to
remove the last three sentences that
provide direction to museums and
Federal agencies pending promulgation
of § 10.11.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Section 10.11 Disposition of Culturally
Unidentifiable Human Remains
This new section fulfills the
Secretary’s responsibility to promulgate
regulations under sections 8(c)(5) and
13 of the Act regarding the process for
the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains. The
Department of the Interior developed
this section after full and careful
consideration of the Review
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
Committee’s recommendations and
other relevant legislation and policy.
Paragraph (b) concerns consultation.
The drafters recognize that as a result of
consultation a museum or Federal
agency may revise its determination
regarding the cultural affiliation of
human remains and associated funerary
objects. Notification and repatriation of
human remains and associated funerary
objects that are determined to be
culturally affiliated with an Indian tribe
or Native Hawaiian organization must
be completed following provisions of 43
CFR 10.9(e) and 10.10(b).
Paragraph (c) establishes three choices
for the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains. The
processes outlined in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) are mandatory. The process
outlined in paragraph (c)(3) and (c)(4)
are voluntary but recommended.
Paragraph (c)(1) requires a museum or
Federal agency to offer to transfer
control of culturally unidentifiable
human remains for which it cannot
prove right of possession to Indian
tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations
according to three priority categories
outlined below.
A museum or Federal agency can
obtain right of possession to Native
American human remains by several
means. Section 2(13) of the Act
stipulates that the original acquisition of
Native American human remains and
associated funerary objects that were
excavated, exhumed, or otherwise
obtained with full knowledge and
consent of the next of kin or the official
governing body of the appropriate
culturally affiliated Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization is deemed
to give right of possession to those
remains. Further, section 3(e) of the Act
states that nothing in section 3 of the
Act shall prevent the governing body of
an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization from expressly
relinquishing control over any Native
American human remains, or title to or
control over any funerary object or
sacred object.
The priority ownership categories in
Section 3(a) of the Act served as a
reasonable model for the proposed
priority categories for disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains. Control of human remains
excavated or discovered under section 3
of the Act can be based on lineal
descent, tribal land, aboriginal land, and
cultural relationship, as well as cultural
affiliation. However, it was necessary to
make several changes to the priority
ownership categories in Section 3(a) of
the Act to accommodate the disposition
of culturally unidentifiable human
remains. The drafters request comments
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58585
from Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian
organizations, museums, Federal
agencies, and other interested persons
regarding the appropriateness of using
the priority structure in determining the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains.
Paragraph (c)(1)(i) stipulates that first
priority would be to the Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization on whose
tribal land, at the time of recovery, the
human remains were recovered. This
category parallels the provisions in
section 3(a)(2) of the Act regarding the
disposition of cultural items from tribal
land after November 16, 1990. This
provision would apply to sites
considered to be tribal land at the time
the original excavation or removal
occurred.
Paragraph (c)(1)(ii) stipulates that
second priority would be to the Indian
tribe or tribes that are recognized as
aboriginally occupying the area in
which the human remains were
recovered. Aboriginal occupation may
be recognized by a final judgment of the
Indian Claims Commission or the
United States Court of Claims, or by
treaty, act of Congress, or executive
order. This category is based on the
provisions of section 3(a)(2)(C) of the
Act regarding the disposition of cultural
items from Federal or tribal land after
November 16, 1990. The Act specifically
identified final judgments of the Indian
Claims Commission and the United
States Court of Claims as two sources of
information regarding aboriginal
occupation. Certain treaties, acts of
Congress, and executive orders also
identify areas aboriginally occupied by
Indian tribes. Maps of the territory
ceded by all United States treaties were
originally published in the 18th Annual
Report of the Bureau of American
Ethnology to the Secretary of the
Smithsonian Institution, 1896–1897
[Government Printing Office, 1899] and
are available online at https://
memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwssilc.html. Treaties signed before the
establishment of the United States
between the various colonial
governments and Indian tribes may also
be used to identify areas aboriginally
occupied by Indian tribes.
Paragraph (c)(1)(iii) stipulates that
third priority would be to Indian tribes
and Native Hawaiian organizations with
a cultural relationship to the region
from which the human remains were
removed or, for human remains lacking
geographic affiliation, a cultural
relationship to the region in which the
museum or Federal agency with control
over the human remains is located. This
category is similar to provisions of
section 3(a)(2)(C)(2) of the Act regarding
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
58586
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the disposition of cultural items from
Federal or tribal land after November
16, 1990. However, while the provisions
of section 3(a)(2)(C)(2) require a cultural
relationship between an Indian tribe
and cultural items, this paragraph
requires a cultural relationship between
an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization and the region from which
the human remains either were removed
or are currently located. Nearly 70
percent of the 110,565 culturally
unidentifiable human remains for which
geographical information was provided
were recovered from the same state in
which the possessing museum or
Federal agency is located. The majority
of the 7,783 human remains lacking
provenience information are likewise
presumed to have been recovered from
the immediate vicinity of the repository
in which they are currently located.
Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) stipulates that if it
can be shown by a preponderance of the
evidence that a different Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization has a
stronger cultural relationship with the
human remains than the Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization specified
in (c)(1)(ii) or (c)(1)(iii), the Indian tribe
or Native Hawaiian organization that
has the strongest demonstrated cultural
relationship would have priority, if
upon notice, such Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization states such a
claim. This provision is similar to the
caveat in section 3(a)(2)(C)(2) of the Act
regarding the disposition of cultural
items from Federal or tribal land after
November 16, 1990. The drafters request
comments from Indian tribes, Native
Hawaiian organizations, museums,
Federal agencies, and other interested
persons regarding the meaning of the
term ‘‘cultural relationship.’’
Paragraph (c)(2) provides notice that
any disposition of human remains
excavated or removed from ‘‘Indian
lands’’ as defined by the Archaeological
Resources Protection Act (ARPA) must
also comply with the provisions of that
statute and its implementing
regulations. ‘‘Indian lands’’ means
‘‘lands of Indian tribes, or Indian
individuals, which are either held in
trust by the United States or subject to
a restriction against alienation imposed
by the United States, except for any
subsurface interests in lands not owned
or controlled by an Indian tribe or
Indian individual’’ [16 U.S.C. 470bb(4)].
Paragraph (c)(3) establishes a process
for the voluntary transfer of control of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains that are not transferred under
provisions of paragraph (c)(1) to a nonfederally recognized Indian group, or
reinterment of culturally unidentifiable
human remains according to State or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
other law. Such dispositions may be
completed upon receipt of a
recommendation from the Secretary or
authorized representative. The Secretary
will only consider recommending such
dispositions with the written consent of
all Indian tribes identified in paragraph
(c)(1) and (c)(2), in order to ensure that
the rights of federally recognized Indian
tribes and tribal members are protected.
The Secretary’s recommendation
regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains or
associated funerary objects to a nonfederally recognized Indian group does
not indicate Federal recognition of the
group’s status as an Indian tribe or the
existence of a government-togovernment relationship.
Paragraph (c)(4) stipulates that a
museum or Federal agency may transfer
control of funerary objects that are
associated with culturally unidentifiable
human remains following the provisions
of paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3).
This provision is consistent with
customary religious and spiritual beliefs
that link the disposition of funerary
objects with the human remains with
which they were intentionally placed.
The Secretary recommends that
museums and Federal agencies transfer
all funerary objects associated with
culturally unidentifiable human
remains unless such a transfer is
otherwise prohibited under law.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant
rule and has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency.
(3) This rule does not materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights or obligations of their
recipients.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The requirements to
consult with Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations are minimal and
do not constitute a significant economic
burden. This rule will require the
disposition of only those Native
American human remains for which the
controlling entity cannot prove right of
possession [25 U.S.C. 3005].
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule will not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more; (2) cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State,
local or tribal government agencies, or
geographic regions; or (3) have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments, or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
This rule will require the disposition of
only those Native American human
remains for which the controlling
museum or Federal agency cannot prove
right of possession [25 U.S.C. 3005(c)].
Federalism (Executive Order 12612)
In accordance with Executive Order
12612, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
A Federalism Assessment is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this rule does not
unduly burden the judicial system and
does not meet the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b) of the order.
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in this rule has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for approval as required by
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The collection of
this information will not be required
until approved by the Office of
Management and Budget. Public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is expected to average 20
hours for the exchange of summary or
inventory information between a
museum and an Indian tribe and 6
hours per response for the notification
to the Secretary, including time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collected
information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other
aspects of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to Information Collection
Officer, Attn: Docket No. 1024–AC84,
National Park Service, Department of
Interior Building, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Room 3317, Washington, DC 20240, and
the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, Washington,
DC 20503.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment and
can be Categorically Excluded under
516 DM 2, Appendix 1.10, ‘‘Policies,
directives, regulations, and guidelines
that are of an administrative, financial,
legal, technical, or procedural nature
and whose environmental effects are too
broad, speculative, or conjectural to
lend themselves to meaningful analysis
and will later be subject to the NEPA
process, either collectively or case-bycase.’’
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Indian Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government to Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ [59 FR 22951], Executive
Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ [65 FR 218], and 512 DM
2, ‘‘Departmental Responsibilities for
Indian Trust Resources,’’ this rule has a
potential effect on federally recognized
Indian tribes. The proposed rule was
developed in consultation with the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Review Committee, which
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
includes members nominated by Indian
tribes. The Review Committee consulted
with Indian tribes in the development of
the Review Committee’s
recommendations regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains that form the basis of
this proposed rule. The Review
Committee consulted with tribal
representatives regarding its
recommendations on February 16–18,
1995 in Los Angeles, CA; June 9–11,
1996 in Billings, MT; June 25–27, 1998
in Portland, OR; and May 2–4, 2000 in
Juneau, AK. Tribal representatives were
also consulted regarding draft text for
these regulations at Review Committee
meetings on May 2–4, 2000 in Juneau,
AK; May 31–June 2, 2002 in Tulsa, OK;
and November 8–9, 2002 in Seattle, WA.
Clarity of Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Drafting Information
This proposed rule was prepared by
Dr. C. Timothy McKeown in
consultation with the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation
Review Committee as directed by
section 8(c)(7) of the Act, and Jennifer
Lee and Jerry Case, WASO Regulations
Program, National Park Service.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of
the Interior, whenever practicable, to
afford the public an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
Accordingly, interested persons may
submit written comments regarding this
proposed rule to the address noted at
the beginning of this rulemaking. We
also request comments from Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58587
tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations,
museums, Federal agencies, and other
interested persons regarding:
1. The meaning of the term ‘‘cultural
relationship;’’ and
2. The appropriateness of using the
priority structure in determining the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains.
Copies of this proposed rule may be
obtained by submitting a request to the
Manager, National NAGPRA program,
National Park Service, at the address
noted at the beginning of this
rulemaking. Commentors wishing the
National Park Service to acknowledge
receipt of their comments must submit
those comments with a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made:
‘‘Comments to Docket No 1024–AD68.’’
The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commentor.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 10
Administrative practice and
procedure, Graves, Hawaiian Natives,
Historic preservation, Indians-claims,
Museums, Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Repatriation.
In consideration of the foregoing, 43
CFR Part 10 is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 10—NATIVE AMERICAN
GRAVES PROTECTION AND
REPATRIATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority for Part 10 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
470dd (2).
2. In § 10.1 revise paragraph (b)(3) to
read as follows:
§ 10.1
Purpose and applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Throughout this part are decision
points which determine how this part
applies in particular circumstances, e.g.,
a decision as to whether a museum
‘‘controls’’ human remains and cultural
objects within the meaning of the
regulations, or, a decision as to whether
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
58588
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
an object is a ‘‘human remain,’’
‘‘funerary object,’’ ‘‘sacred object,’’ or
‘‘object of cultural patrimony’’ within
the meaning of the regulations. Any
final determination making the Act or
this part inapplicable is subject to
review under section 15 of the Act. With
respect to Federal agencies, the final
denial of a request of a lineal
descendant, Indian tribe, or Native
Hawaiian organization for the
repatriation or disposition of human
remains, funerary objects, sacred
objects, or objects of cultural patrimony
brought under, and in compliance with,
the Act and this part constitutes a final
agency action under the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 704).
3. Amend § 10.2 by revising paragraph
(e) and adding paragraph (g)(5) to read
as follows:
§ 10.2
Definitions.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) What is cultural affiliation?
Cultural affiliation means that there is a
relationship of shared group identity
which can be reasonably traced
historically or prehistorically between
members of a present-day Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization and an
identifiable earlier group. Cultural
affiliation is established when the
preponderance of the evidence—based
on geographical, kinship, biological,
archeological, anthropological,
linguistic, folklore, oral tradition,
historical evidence, or other information
or expert opinion—reasonably leads to
such a conclusion.
(2) What does culturally
unidentifiable mean? Culturally
unidentifiable refers to human remains
and associated funerary objects in
museum or Federal agency collections
for which no lineal descendant or
culturally affiliated Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization has been
identified.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(5) Disposition means the transfer of
control over Native American human
remains, funerary objects, sacred
objects, and objects of cultural
patrimony by a museum or Federal
agency under this part. This part
establishes disposition procedures for
several different situations:
(i) Custody of human remains,
funerary objects, sacred objects, and
objects of cultural patrimony excavated
intentionally from, or discovered
inadvertently on Federal or tribal lands
after November 16, 1990 is established
under § 10.6;
(ii) Repatriation of human remains,
funerary objects, sacred objects, and
objects of cultural patrimony in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
museum and Federal agency collections
to a lineal descendant or culturally
affiliated Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization is established
under § 10.10.
(iii) Disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains, with or
without associated funerary objects, in
museum or Federal agency collections is
established under § 10.11.
4. Amend 10.9 by revising paragraphs
(e)(2), (5), and (6) as follows:
§ 10.9
Inventories.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) The notice of inventory
completion must:
(i) Summarize the contents of the
inventory in sufficient detail so as to
enable the recipients to determine their
interest in claiming the inventoried
items;
(ii) Identify each particular set of
human remains or each associated
funerary object and the circumstances
surrounding its acquisition;
(iii) Describe the human remains or
associated funerary objects that are
clearly identifiable as to cultural
affiliation;
(iv) Describe the human remains or
associated funerary objects that are not
clearly identifiable as culturally
affiliated with an Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization, but that are
likely to be culturally affiliated with a
particular Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization given the totality
of circumstances surrounding
acquisition of the human remains or
associated objects; and
(v) Describe those human remains,
with or without associated funerary
objects, that are culturally
unidentifiable but that may be
transferred under § 10.11.
(3) * * *
(4) * * *
(5) Upon request by an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization that has
received or should have received a
notice and inventory under paragraphs
(e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section, a
museum or Federal agency must supply
additional available documentation.
(i) For purposes of this paragraph,
‘‘documentation’’ means a summary of
existing museum or Federal agency
records including inventories or
catalogues, relevant studies, or other
pertinent data for the limited purpose of
determining the geographical origin,
cultural affiliation, and basic facts
surrounding the acquisition and
accession of human remains and
associated funerary objects.
(ii) Documentation supplied under
this paragraph is considered a public
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
record except as exempted under
relevant laws. Neither a request for
documentation nor any other provisions
of this part may be construed as
authorizing either:
(A) The initiation of new scientific
studies of the human remains and
associated funerary objects; or
(B) Other means of acquiring or
preserving additional scientific
information from such remains and
objects.
(6) If the museum or Federal agency
official determines that the museum or
Federal agency has possession of or
control over human remains, with or
without associated funerary objects, that
cannot be identified as affiliated with a
lineal descendent, Indian tribes, or
Native Hawaiian organizations, the
museum or Federal agency must
provide the Manager, National NAGPRA
Program notice of this result and a copy
of the list of such culturally
unidentifiable human remains and any
associated funerary objects. The
Manager, National NAGPRA Program
must make this information available to
members of the Review Committee.
Culturally unidentifiable human
remains, with or without associated
funerary objects, are subject to
disposition under § 10.11.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Add § 10.11 to read as follows:
§ 10.11 Disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains.
(a) General. This section implements
section 8 (c)(5) of the Act.
(b) Consultation. (1) The museum or
Federal agency official must initiate
consultation regarding the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and associated funerary objects:
(i) Within ninety (90) days of receipt
of a request from an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization to transfer
control of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary
objects; or
(ii) Absent such a request, before any
offer to transfer control of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects.
(2) The museum or Federal agency
official must initiate consultation with
officials and traditional religious leaders
of all Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations:
(i) From whose tribal lands, at the
time of the removal, the human remains
and associated funerary objects were
removed;
(ii) From whose aboriginal lands the
human remains and associated funerary
objects were removed. Aboriginal
occupation may be recognized by a final
judgment of the Indian Claims
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Commission or the United States Court
of Claims, or a treaty, Act of Congress,
or Executive Order; and
(iii)(A) With a cultural relationship to
the region from which the human
remains and associated funerary objects
were removed; or
(B) In the case of human remains and
associated funerary objects lacking
geographic affiliation, with a cultural
relationship to the region in which the
museum or Federal agency repository is
located.
(3) The museum or Federal agency
official must provide the following
information in writing to all Indian
tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations with which the museum
or Federal agency consults:
(i) A list of all Indian tribes and
Native Hawaiian organizations that are
being, or have been, consulted regarding
the particular human remains and
associated funerary objects;
(ii) A list of any non-federally
recognized Indian groups that are
known to have a relationship of shared
group identity with the particular
human remains and associated funerary
objects; and
(iii) An offer to provide a copy of the
original inventory and additional
documentation regarding the particular
human remains and associated funerary
objects.
(4) During consultation, museum and
Federal agency officials must request, as
appropriate, the following information
from Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations:
(i) The name and address of the
Indian tribe official to act as
representative in consultations related
to particular human remains and
associated funerary objects;
(ii) The names and appropriate
methods to contact any traditional
religious leaders who should be
consulted regarding the human remains
and associated funerary objects;
(iii) Temporal and/or geographic
criteria that the museum or Federal
agency should use to identify groups of
human remains and associated funerary
objects for consultation;
(iv) The names and addresses of other
Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian
organizations, or non-federally
recognized Indian groups that should be
included in the consultations; and
(v) A schedule and process for
consultation.
(5) During consultation, the museum
or Federal agency official should seek to
develop a proposed disposition for
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and associated funerary objects
that is mutually agreeable to the parties
specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
section. The agreement must be
consistent with this part.
(6) If consultation results in a
determination that human remains and
associated funerary objects previously
determined to be culturally
unidentifiable are actually culturally
affiliated with an Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization, the notification
and repatriation of the human remains
and associated funerary objects must be
completed as required by § 10.9 (e) and
§ 10.10 (b).
(c) Disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects. (1) A
museum or Federal agency that is
unable to prove that it has right of
possession, as defined at § 10.10 (a)(2),
to culturally unidentifiable human
remains must offer to transfer control of
the human remains to Indian tribes and
Native Hawaiian organizations in the
following priority order:
(i) The Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization from whose
tribal land, at the time of the excavation
or removal, the human remains were
removed;
(ii) The Indian tribe or tribes that are
recognized as aboriginally occupying
the area from which the human remains
were removed. Aboriginal occupation
may be recognized by a final judgment
of the Indian Claims Commission or the
United States Court of Claims, or a
treaty, Act of Congress, or Executive
Order; or
(iii) The Indian tribe and Native
Hawaiian organization with:
(A) A cultural relationship to the
region from which the human remains
were removed, or
(B) For human remains lacking
geographic affiliation, a cultural
relationship to the region in which the
museum or Federal agency with control
over the human remains is located.
(iv) If it can be shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that
another Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization has a stronger cultural
relationship with the human remains
than an entity specified in paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) or (c)(1)(iii) of this section, the
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization that has the strongest
demonstrated cultural relationship, if
upon notice, the Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization claims the
human remains.
(2) Any disposition of human remains
excavated or removed from ‘‘Indian
lands’’ as defined by the Archaeological
Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
470bb (4)) must also comply with the
provisions of that statute and its
implementing regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58589
(3) If none of the Indian tribes or
Native Hawaiian organizations
identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section agrees to accept control, a
museum or Federal agency may, upon
receiving a recommendation from the
Secretary or authorized representative:
(i) Transfer control of culturally
unidentifiable human remains to a nonfederally recognized Indian group, or
(ii) Reinter culturally unidentifiable
human remains according to State or
other law.
(4) The Secretary may make a
recommendation under paragraph (c)(3)
of this section only with the written
consent of all Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations stipulated in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this
section.
(5) A museum or Federal agency may
also transfer control of funerary objects
that are associated with culturally
unidentifiable human remains. The
Secretary recommends that museums
and Federal agencies engage in such
transfers whenever Federal or State law
would not otherwise preclude them.
(d) Notification. (1) Disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and associated funerary objects
under paragraph (c) may not occur until
at least thirty (30) days after publication
of a notice of inventory completion in
the Federal Register as described in
§ 10.9.
(2) Within 30 days of publishing the
notice of inventory completion, the
National NAGPRA Program manager
must:
(i) Revise the Review Committee
inventory of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary
objects to indicate the notice’s
publication; and
(ii) Make the revised Review
Committee inventory of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects accessible to
Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian
organizations, non-federally recognized
Indian groups, museums, and Federal
agencies.
(e) Disputes. Any person who wishes
to contest actions taken by museums or
Federal agencies regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary
objects is encouraged to do so through
informal negotiations to achieve a fair
resolution of the matter. The Review
Committee may facilitate the informal
resolution of such disputes that are not
resolved by good faith negotiation under
§ 10.17. In addition, the United States
District Courts have jurisdiction over
any action brought that alleges a
violation of the Act.
6. Amend § 10.12 by:
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
58590
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
A. Revising paragraphs (b)(ii), (iii),
and (iv), and
B. Adding paragraph (b)(ix) to read as
follows:
§ 10.12
Civil penalties.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) After November 16, 1993, or a date
specified under § 10.13, whichever
deadline is applicable, has not
completed summaries as required by the
Act; or
(iii) After November 16, 1995, or a
date specified under § 10.13, or the date
specified in an extension issued by the
Secretary, whichever deadline is
applicable, has not completed
inventories as required by the Act; or
(iv) After May 16, 1996, or 6 months
after completion of an inventory under
an extension issued by the Secretary, or
6 months after the date specified under
§ 10.13, whichever deadline is
applicable, has not notified culturally
affiliated Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations; or
*
*
*
*
*
(ix) Does not offer to transfer control
of culturally unidentifiable human
remains for which it cannot prove right
of possession under § 10.11.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 2, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–20209 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket No. FEMA–B–7740]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Comments are requested on
the proposed Base (1 percent annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and
proposed BFE modifications for the
communities listed in the table below.
The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Oct 15, 2007
Jkt 214001
regarding these proposed regulatory
flood elevations. The BFEs and
modified BFEs are a part of the
floodplain management measures that
the community is required either to
adopt or show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain
qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP). In addition, these elevations,
once finalized, will be used by
insurance agents, and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium
rates for new buildings and the contents
in those buildings.
DATES: Comments are to be submitted
on or before January 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The corresponding
preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the community’s map repository. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
You may submit comments, identified
by Docket No. FEMA–B–7740, to
William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief,
Engineering Management Section,
Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief,
Engineering Management Section,
Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) proposes to make
determinations of BFEs and modified
BFEs for each community listed below,
in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973,
42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
These proposed BFEs and modified
BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR
60.3, are the minimum that are required.
They should not be construed to mean
that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own, or
pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities.
These proposed elevations are used to
meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are also
used to calculate the appropriate flood
insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after these elevations are
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
made final, and for the contents in these
buildings.
Comments on any aspect of the Flood
Insurance Study and FIRM, other than
the proposed BFEs, will be considered.
A letter acknowledging receipt of any
comments will not be sent.
Administrative Procedure Act
Statement. This matter is not a
rulemaking governed by the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553. FEMA publishes flood
elevation determinations for notice and
comment; however, they are governed
by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.
4001 et seq., and do not fall under the
APA.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This proposed rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44
CFR part 10, Environmental
Consideration. An environmental
impact assessment has not been
prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood
elevation determinations are not within
the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review. This proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the criteria of section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This proposed rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This proposed rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order
12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67
Administrative practice and
procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 67—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 67
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
§ 67.4
[Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 67.4 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 16, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58582-58590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 10
RIN 1024-AD68
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
Regulations--Disposition of Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule specifies procedures for the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human remains in the possession or control of
museums or Federal agencies, thus implementing the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (Act). Publication of
this document is intended to solicit comments from Indian tribes,
Native Hawaiian organizations, museums, Federal agencies, and members
of the public before its publication as a final rule.
DATES: Written comments will be accepted through January 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the number RIN 1024-
AD68, by any of the following methods:
--Federal rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
--Mail to: Dr. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program, National
Park Service, Docket No. 1024-AC84, 1849 C Street, NW., (2253),
Washington, DC 20240.
--Hand deliver to: Dr. Sherry Hutt, 1201 Eye Street, NW., 8th floor,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National
NAGPRA Program, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW., 8th floor,
Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202) 354-1479, facsimile (202) 371-
5197.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
Sections 8(c)(5) and (c)(7) of the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (Act) (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) gives
the Review Committee the responsibility for recommending specific
actions for developing a process for disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and consulting with the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) in the development of regulations to carry out the
Act. Section 13 charges the Secretary with promulgating regulations to
carry out the Act. Section 5(1) of the Archaeological Resources
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 470aa-mm) authorizes the Secretary to
promulgate regulations providing for the ultimate disposition of
archaeological resources and other resources removed under the Act of
June 27, 1960 (the Reservoir Salvage Act, as amended, also known as the
Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974, 16 U.S.C. 469-
469c-1) or the Act of June 8, 1906 (the Antiquities Act of 1906, as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 431-433).
Background
On November 16, 1990, President George Bush signed into law the
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Act
addresses the rights of lineal descendants, Indian tribes, and Native
Hawaiian organizations to certain Native American human remains,
funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony.
Section 8 of the Act established the Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Review Committee of seven private citizens to monitor
and review implementation of the inventory and identification process
and repatriation activities required under the Act. Section 8(c)(5)
charged the Review Committee with compiling an inventory of culturally
unidentifiable human remains that are in the possession or control of
museums or Federal agencies and recommending specific actions for
developing a process for disposition of such remains. The inventory of
culturally unidentifiable human remains and recommendations regarding
their disposition relate only to human remains in the possession or
control of museums and Federal agencies and not to human remains that
are excavated or removed from Federal or tribal lands after November
16, 1990 under section 3 of the Act.
Current regulations implementing the Act require museums and
Federal agencies to retain possession of culturally unidentifiable
human remains until final regulations are promulgated or the Secretary
recommends otherwise. The disposition of funerary objects associated
with culturally unidentifiable human remains is not specifically
addressed in the Act. During deliberations over recommendations
regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains,
the Review Committee considered the intrinsic relationship of human
remains to associated funerary objects and concluded that nothing in
the Act precludes the voluntary disposition of these cultural items by
museums or Federal agencies to the extent allowable by Federal law.
In 1994, the Review Committee began to formally solicit comments
from Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, museums, and Federal
agencies regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable human
remains. The Review Committee developed its first draft of
recommendations regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary objects in February 1995. These
draft recommendations were published for
[[Page 58583]]
public comment in the Federal Register (60 FR 32163, June 20, 1995).
Copies of the draft were sent to over 3,000 Indian tribes, Native
Hawaiian organizations, museums, Federal agencies, national museum and
scientific organizations, and members of the public. One hundred and
twenty-nine written comments were received during the 100-day comment
period, representing 16 Indian tribes, 49 museums, 12 Federal agencies,
3 national museum and scientific organizations, and 58 members of the
public.
Based on the comments received, a revised draft of recommendations
regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains
and associated funerary objects was developed in June 1996. The revised
draft recommendations were published for public comment in the Federal
Register (61 FR 43071, August 20, 1996). Copies of the draft were sent
to over 3,000 Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, museums,
Federal agencies, national museum and scientific organizations, and
members of the public. Forty-nine written comments were received during
the 45-day comment period, representing 4 Indian tribes, 26 museums, 4
Federal agencies, 6 national museum and scientific organizations, and
11 members of the public.
In June 1998, the Review Committee developed draft principles of
agreement regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable human
remains. The draft principles of agreement were published for public
comment in the Federal Register on two different occasions (64 FR
33502, June 23, 1999 and 64 FR 41135, July 29, 1999). Copies of the
draft were sent to over 3,000 Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian
organizations, museums, Federal agencies, national museum and
scientific organizations, and members of the public. Eighty-nine
written comments were received during the 70-day comment period,
representing 13 Indian tribes, 39 museums, 4 Federal agencies, 5
national museum and scientific organizations, and 22 members of the
public.
While the Review Committee developed the draft of general
recommendations, a separate procedure was developed for consideration
of case-by-case requests for disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary objects based on a recommendation
from the Secretary [43 CFR 10.9(e)(6)]. Forty-one case-by-case requests
were received and all were referred to the Review Committee for
consideration. Twenty-six requests were made by museums and 15 requests
were made by Federal agencies. The Review Committee considered each
request as part of its regular meeting agenda and recommendations were
referred to the National Park Service for action. Responses to each
requesting museum or Federal agency were signed by a representative of
the Secretary as required by Sec. 10.9(e)(6).
Of the 41 requests, the Secretary's representative recommended
disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains in 33 cases.
Nine of the 33 recommended dispositions were to Indian tribes based on
the recognition of their aboriginal occupation of the area in which the
human remains and associated funerary objects were recovered, 8 were to
coalitions including federally recognized Indian tribes, 11 were to
non-federally recognized Indian groups, and 5 were to be completed
according to applicable State law.
Eleven of the 33 recommended dispositions also included funerary
objects that were associated with the culturally unidentifiable human
remains. In response to one of the requests, the representative of the
Secretary provided a recommendation on February 7, 2000 that stated
``the statutory language neither requires nor precludes the committee
from making recommendations regarding the disposition of funerary
objects associated with culturally unidentifiable human remains. While
regulatory provisions require museums or federal agencies to retain
possession of culturally unidentifiable human remains until final
regulations are promulgated or the Secretary recommends otherwise,
these provisions do not apply to associated funerary objects. A museum
may choose to repatriate such items. However, a Notice of Inventory
Completion must be published in the Federal Register before the
disposition.''
Of the 41 requests made regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains, in eight cases the Secretary's
representative recommended that the culturally unidentifiable human
remains be retained pending completion of the inventory required under
43 CFR 10.9.
After circulating three drafts for public comment and considering
the specific case-by-case requests, the Review Committee developed its
final recommendations regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains in May 2000. The recommendations were
published on June 8, 2000 (65 FR 36462).
The Review Committee recognized that the legislative intent of the
Act is expressed by its title: the protection of Native American graves
and repatriation [of Native American cultural items]. Specifically, the
Review Committee found that the Act requires (1) the disposition of all
Native American human remains and cultural items excavated on or
removed from Federal lands after November 16, 1990, with disposition
based on linkages of lineal descent, tribal land, cultural affiliation,
or aboriginal land; (2) the repatriation of culturally affiliated human
remains and associated funerary objects in Federal agency and museum
collections, if requested by a culturally affiliated Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization, with repatriation based on linkages of
lineal descent or cultural affiliation; and (3) the development of
regulations for the disposition of unclaimed human remains and objects
and culturally unidentifiable human remains in Federal agency and
museum collections. Although the treatment of funerary objects
associated with culturally unidentifiable human remains is not
addressed in the Act, the Review Committee recognized that the Act does
not prohibit the voluntary repatriation of these cultural items by
museums or Federal agencies to the extent allowed by Federal law.
Museums or Federal agencies must determine whether Native American
human remains in their control are related to lineal descendants,
culturally affiliated with a present-day federally recognized Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization, or are culturally
unidentifiable. This determination must be made in consultation with
all appropriate Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, as
described in 43 CFR 10.9(b), and through a good faith evaluation of all
relevant and available documentation. A determination that human
remains are culturally unidentifiable may change to a determination of
cultural affiliation as additional information becomes available
through ongoing consultation or any other source. The Review Committee
finds no statute of limitations in the Act for lineal descendants,
Indian tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations to make a claim, and a
museum or Federal agency's determination that human remains are
culturally unidentifiable may occur for different reasons.
Categories of Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains
The Review Committee's recommendations identified three categories
of culturally unidentifiable
[[Page 58584]]
human remains: (1) those for which cultural affiliation could be
determined but that the appropriate Native American group is not
federally recognized as an Indian tribe; (2) those that represent an
identifiable earlier group, but for which no present-day Indian tribe
has been identified by the museum or Federal agency; and (3) those for
which the museum or Federal agency believes that evidence is
insufficient to identify an earlier group.
Documentation
Documentation is required for inventory completion and
determinations of cultural affiliation by museums or Federal agencies
and should be prepared in accordance with the standards outlined in 43
CFR 10.9(c) and 10.14. Documentation must occur within the context of
the consultation process. The Review Committee proposed that additional
study of culturally unidentifiable human remains and associated
funerary objects is not prohibited if the appropriate parties in
consultation agree that such study is appropriate. The Review Committee
confirmed that once inventories have been completed, the Act may not be
used to require new scientific studies or other means of acquiring or
preserving additional scientific information from human remains and
associated funerary objects.
Disposition
The Review Committee proposed three guidelines for the disposition
of culturally unidentifiable human remains.
1. Respect must be the foundation for any disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains. Human remains determined to be culturally
unidentifiable are no less deserving of respect than those for which
cultural affiliation has been established.
2. Because there may be different reasons for human remains being
unclaimed or determined to be culturally unidentifiable, there may be
more than one appropriate disposition solution. Examples of appropriate
disposition solutions include the return of human remains that are
determined to be culturally unidentifiable that were removed from
tribal land; human remains that are determined to be culturally
unidentifiable that were recovered from the aboriginal land of an
Indian tribe; or human remains that are culturally unidentifiable but
for which there is a relationship of shared group identity with a non-
federally recognized Native American group.
3. A museum or Federal agency may also seek the recommendation of
the Review Committee for the disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains based on criteria other than those listed above.
The Review Committee proposed two models for determining the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains. The first model
involved the joint recommendations by claimants and museums or Federal
agencies. Disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains may
proceed in those cases where all the relevant parties have agreed in
writing that the inventory requirements have been met and that the
Review Committee's guidelines for respectful treatment, recognition of
alternative disposition solutions, and the use of the Review Committee
for disposition recommendations have been followed. The Review
Committee noted that it had already recommended disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human remains in cases that met the three
guidelines.
The second model involved the joint recommendations of regional
consortia. The Review Committee recognized that historical and cultural
factors, and therefore issues concerning the definition and disposition
of culturally unidentifiable human remains, vary significantly across
the United States. Therefore, the Review Committee recommended that
regional solutions be developed that would best fit regional
circumstances. The Review Committee recommended a process in which
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations define regions within
which the most appropriate solutions for disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains might be determined. Within each region,
the appropriate Federal agencies, museums, Indian tribes, and Native
Hawaiian organizations would consult together and propose a framework
and schedule to develop and implement the most appropriate model for
their region. Dispositions agreed upon through regional consultation
meetings would be made by the appropriate Federal agencies, museums,
and Indian tribes. If a disposition agreement could not be reached
through regional consultation meetings, the matter could be brought
before the Review Committee. Any proposed regional disposition
agreement would have to meet the Review Committee's three guidelines
for disposition.
Inventory
Section 8(c)(5) of the Act directs the Review Committee to compile
an inventory of culturally unidentifiable human remains that are in the
possession or control of museums or Federal agencies. The scope of this
inventory was expanded to include both culturally unidentifiable human
remains and funerary objects with which they are associated by Sec.
10.9(d)(2).
The Review Committee's inventory summarizes information provided by
museums or Federal agencies in their inventories. This includes:
1. The number of human remains and associated funerary objects
under their control;
2. State and county from which the human remains and associated
funerary objects were removed;
3. The earlier group to which the human remains and associated
funerary objects are thought to have belonged;
4. The date range during which the human remains and associated
funerary objects are thought to have been originally interred; and
5. The date when custody of the human remains and associated
funerary objects was either transferred to an Indian tribe, Native
Hawaiian organization, or non-federally recognized Indian group or they
were reinterred.
Section 8(g)(2) of the Act requires the Secretary to provide
reasonable administrative and staff support necessary for the
deliberations of the Review Committee. One of those duties has been
compilation of the Review Committee's inventory of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects. The
Review Committee's inventory was compiled from the inventories
submitted by museums or Federal agencies under 43 CFR 10.9(e)(6). Each
museum and Federal agency had an opportunity to verify the Review
Committee's inventory of culturally unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects from their institution for verification
before submission of the final inventory to the Review Committee. The
Review Committee's inventory is posted at https://www.cr.nps.gov/nagpra/
onlinedb/index.htm and presently includes information on 118,348 human
remains and 846,187 associated funerary objects from 614 museums or
Federal agencies.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 10.1 Purpose and Applicability
Paragraph 10.1(b)(3) provides clarification to Federal agencies as
to when a determination constitutes final agency action as used in the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 704).
[[Page 58585]]
Section 10.2 Definitions
Section 10.2 provides definitions of terms used throughout Part 10.
Paragraph 10.2(e) provides additional clarification to the
definition of cultural affiliation. Human remains and associated
funerary objects in museum or Federal agency collections for which no
lineal descendant or culturally affiliated Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization was determined are referred to as culturally
unidentifiable.
Paragraph 10.2(g)(5) provides a definition of disposition and
identifies procedures to effectuate this process in various situations.
Section 10.9 Inventories
Paragraph 10.9(e)(2) details the contents of notices of inventory
completion. Additional text to clarify that such notices include
information regarding culturally unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects to be transferred or reinterred under 43
CFR 10.11 is proposed for addition.
Paragraph 10.9(e)(5) directs museums or Federal agencies to supply
additional available documentation upon the request of an Indian tribe
or Native Hawaiian organization. Additional text to clarify that such
documentation shall be considered a public record subject to disclosure
except when exempted under applicable law, such as the Freedom of
Information Act and the Privacy Act, is proposed for addition. Further,
as required by section 5(B)(2) (Inventory For Human Remains and
Associated Funerary Objects) of the Act, neither a request for such
documentation nor any provisions of the regulations shall be construed
as authorizing the initiation of new scientific studies of such human
remains and associated funerary objects or other means of acquiring or
preserving additional scientific information from such remains and
objects.
Paragraph 10.9(e)(6) is rewritten to remove the last three
sentences that provide direction to museums and Federal agencies
pending promulgation of Sec. 10.11.
Section 10.11 Disposition of Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains
This new section fulfills the Secretary's responsibility to
promulgate regulations under sections 8(c)(5) and 13 of the Act
regarding the process for the disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains. The Department of the Interior developed this section
after full and careful consideration of the Review Committee's
recommendations and other relevant legislation and policy.
Paragraph (b) concerns consultation. The drafters recognize that as
a result of consultation a museum or Federal agency may revise its
determination regarding the cultural affiliation of human remains and
associated funerary objects. Notification and repatriation of human
remains and associated funerary objects that are determined to be
culturally affiliated with an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization must be completed following provisions of 43 CFR 10.9(e)
and 10.10(b).
Paragraph (c) establishes three choices for the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable human remains. The processes outlined in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) are mandatory. The process outlined in
paragraph (c)(3) and (c)(4) are voluntary but recommended.
Paragraph (c)(1) requires a museum or Federal agency to offer to
transfer control of culturally unidentifiable human remains for which
it cannot prove right of possession to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian
organizations according to three priority categories outlined below.
A museum or Federal agency can obtain right of possession to Native
American human remains by several means. Section 2(13) of the Act
stipulates that the original acquisition of Native American human
remains and associated funerary objects that were excavated, exhumed,
or otherwise obtained with full knowledge and consent of the next of
kin or the official governing body of the appropriate culturally
affiliated Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization is deemed to
give right of possession to those remains. Further, section 3(e) of the
Act states that nothing in section 3 of the Act shall prevent the
governing body of an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization from
expressly relinquishing control over any Native American human remains,
or title to or control over any funerary object or sacred object.
The priority ownership categories in Section 3(a) of the Act served
as a reasonable model for the proposed priority categories for
disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains. Control of
human remains excavated or discovered under section 3 of the Act can be
based on lineal descent, tribal land, aboriginal land, and cultural
relationship, as well as cultural affiliation. However, it was
necessary to make several changes to the priority ownership categories
in Section 3(a) of the Act to accommodate the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains. The drafters request comments from Indian
tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, museums, Federal agencies, and
other interested persons regarding the appropriateness of using the
priority structure in determining the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains.
Paragraph (c)(1)(i) stipulates that first priority would be to the
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization on whose tribal land, at
the time of recovery, the human remains were recovered. This category
parallels the provisions in section 3(a)(2) of the Act regarding the
disposition of cultural items from tribal land after November 16, 1990.
This provision would apply to sites considered to be tribal land at the
time the original excavation or removal occurred.
Paragraph (c)(1)(ii) stipulates that second priority would be to
the Indian tribe or tribes that are recognized as aboriginally
occupying the area in which the human remains were recovered.
Aboriginal occupation may be recognized by a final judgment of the
Indian Claims Commission or the United States Court of Claims, or by
treaty, act of Congress, or executive order. This category is based on
the provisions of section 3(a)(2)(C) of the Act regarding the
disposition of cultural items from Federal or tribal land after
November 16, 1990. The Act specifically identified final judgments of
the Indian Claims Commission and the United States Court of Claims as
two sources of information regarding aboriginal occupation. Certain
treaties, acts of Congress, and executive orders also identify areas
aboriginally occupied by Indian tribes. Maps of the territory ceded by
all United States treaties were originally published in the 18th Annual
Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the
Smithsonian Institution, 1896-1897 [Government Printing Office, 1899]
and are available online at https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwss-
ilc.html. Treaties signed before the establishment of the United States
between the various colonial governments and Indian tribes may also be
used to identify areas aboriginally occupied by Indian tribes.
Paragraph (c)(1)(iii) stipulates that third priority would be to
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations with a cultural
relationship to the region from which the human remains were removed
or, for human remains lacking geographic affiliation, a cultural
relationship to the region in which the museum or Federal agency with
control over the human remains is located. This category is similar to
provisions of section 3(a)(2)(C)(2) of the Act regarding
[[Page 58586]]
the disposition of cultural items from Federal or tribal land after
November 16, 1990. However, while the provisions of section
3(a)(2)(C)(2) require a cultural relationship between an Indian tribe
and cultural items, this paragraph requires a cultural relationship
between an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and the region
from which the human remains either were removed or are currently
located. Nearly 70 percent of the 110,565 culturally unidentifiable
human remains for which geographical information was provided were
recovered from the same state in which the possessing museum or Federal
agency is located. The majority of the 7,783 human remains lacking
provenience information are likewise presumed to have been recovered
from the immediate vicinity of the repository in which they are
currently located.
Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) stipulates that if it can be shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that a different Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization has a stronger cultural relationship with the
human remains than the Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization
specified in (c)(1)(ii) or (c)(1)(iii), the Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization that has the strongest demonstrated cultural
relationship would have priority, if upon notice, such Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization states such a claim. This provision is
similar to the caveat in section 3(a)(2)(C)(2) of the Act regarding the
disposition of cultural items from Federal or tribal land after
November 16, 1990. The drafters request comments from Indian tribes,
Native Hawaiian organizations, museums, Federal agencies, and other
interested persons regarding the meaning of the term ``cultural
relationship.''
Paragraph (c)(2) provides notice that any disposition of human
remains excavated or removed from ``Indian lands'' as defined by the
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) must also comply with
the provisions of that statute and its implementing regulations.
``Indian lands'' means ``lands of Indian tribes, or Indian individuals,
which are either held in trust by the United States or subject to a
restriction against alienation imposed by the United States, except for
any subsurface interests in lands not owned or controlled by an Indian
tribe or Indian individual'' [16 U.S.C. 470bb(4)].
Paragraph (c)(3) establishes a process for the voluntary transfer
of control of culturally unidentifiable human remains that are not
transferred under provisions of paragraph (c)(1) to a non-federally
recognized Indian group, or reinterment of culturally unidentifiable
human remains according to State or other law. Such dispositions may be
completed upon receipt of a recommendation from the Secretary or
authorized representative. The Secretary will only consider
recommending such dispositions with the written consent of all Indian
tribes identified in paragraph (c)(1) and (c)(2), in order to ensure
that the rights of federally recognized Indian tribes and tribal
members are protected. The Secretary's recommendation regarding the
disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains or associated
funerary objects to a non-federally recognized Indian group does not
indicate Federal recognition of the group's status as an Indian tribe
or the existence of a government-to-government relationship.
Paragraph (c)(4) stipulates that a museum or Federal agency may
transfer control of funerary objects that are associated with
culturally unidentifiable human remains following the provisions of
paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3). This provision is consistent
with customary religious and spiritual beliefs that link the
disposition of funerary objects with the human remains with which they
were intentionally placed. The Secretary recommends that museums and
Federal agencies transfer all funerary objects associated with
culturally unidentifiable human remains unless such a transfer is
otherwise prohibited under law.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant rule and has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
(3) This rule does not materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights or
obligations of their recipients.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The requirements to consult with Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations are minimal and do not constitute a significant economic
burden. This rule will require the disposition of only those Native
American human remains for which the controlling entity cannot prove
right of possession [25 U.S.C. 3005].
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule will not (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) cause
a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, local or tribal government agencies, or
geographic regions; or (3) have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments, or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have
significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is
not required. This rule will require the disposition of only those
Native American human remains for which the controlling museum or
Federal agency cannot prove right of possession [25 U.S.C. 3005(c)].
Federalism (Executive Order 12612)
In accordance with Executive Order 12612, the rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. A Federalism Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the
Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and does not meet the requirements of sections 3(a) and
3(b) of the order.
[[Page 58587]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in this rule has been
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval as
required by 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The collection of this information
will not be required until approved by the Office of Management and
Budget. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
expected to average 20 hours for the exchange of summary or inventory
information between a museum and an Indian tribe and 6 hours per
response for the notification to the Secretary, including time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collected
information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other
aspects of this collection of information, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to Information Collection Officer, Attn: Docket
No. 1024-AC84, National Park Service, Department of Interior Building,
1849 C Street, NW., Room 3317, Washington, DC 20240, and the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior, Washington,
DC 20503.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment and can be Categorically
Excluded under 516 DM 2, Appendix 1.10, ``Policies, directives,
regulations, and guidelines that are of an administrative, financial,
legal, technical, or procedural nature and whose environmental effects
are too broad, speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to
meaningful analysis and will later be subject to the NEPA process,
either collectively or case-by-case.''
Government-to-Government Relationship With Indian Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government to Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' [59 FR 22951], Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' [65 FR 218], and 512 DM
2, ``Departmental Responsibilities for Indian Trust Resources,'' this
rule has a potential effect on federally recognized Indian tribes. The
proposed rule was developed in consultation with the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, which includes
members nominated by Indian tribes. The Review Committee consulted with
Indian tribes in the development of the Review Committee's
recommendations regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains that form the basis of this proposed rule. The Review
Committee consulted with tribal representatives regarding its
recommendations on February 16-18, 1995 in Los Angeles, CA; June 9-11,
1996 in Billings, MT; June 25-27, 1998 in Portland, OR; and May 2-4,
2000 in Juneau, AK. Tribal representatives were also consulted
regarding draft text for these regulations at Review Committee meetings
on May 2-4, 2000 in Juneau, AK; May 31-June 2, 2002 in Tulsa, OK; and
November 8-9, 2002 in Seattle, WA.
Clarity of Rule
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
Drafting Information
This proposed rule was prepared by Dr. C. Timothy McKeown in
consultation with the Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Review Committee as directed by section 8(c)(7) of the
Act, and Jennifer Lee and Jerry Case, WASO Regulations Program,
National Park Service.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of the Interior, whenever
practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule to the address noted at the
beginning of this rulemaking. We also request comments from Indian
tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, museums, Federal agencies, and
other interested persons regarding:
1. The meaning of the term ``cultural relationship;'' and
2. The appropriateness of using the priority structure in
determining the disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains.
Copies of this proposed rule may be obtained by submitting a
request to the Manager, National NAGPRA program, National Park Service,
at the address noted at the beginning of this rulemaking. Commentors
wishing the National Park Service to acknowledge receipt of their
comments must submit those comments with a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No 1024-AD68.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the
commentor.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 10
Administrative practice and procedure, Graves, Hawaiian Natives,
Historic preservation, Indians-claims, Museums, Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Repatriation.
In consideration of the foregoing, 43 CFR Part 10 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 10--NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION
REGULATIONS
1. The authority for Part 10 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 470dd (2).
2. In Sec. 10.1 revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.1 Purpose and applicability.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Throughout this part are decision points which determine how
this part applies in particular circumstances, e.g., a decision as to
whether a museum ``controls'' human remains and cultural objects within
the meaning of the regulations, or, a decision as to whether
[[Page 58588]]
an object is a ``human remain,'' ``funerary object,'' ``sacred
object,'' or ``object of cultural patrimony'' within the meaning of the
regulations. Any final determination making the Act or this part
inapplicable is subject to review under section 15 of the Act. With
respect to Federal agencies, the final denial of a request of a lineal
descendant, Indian tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization for the
repatriation or disposition of human remains, funerary objects, sacred
objects, or objects of cultural patrimony brought under, and in
compliance with, the Act and this part constitutes a final agency
action under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 704).
3. Amend Sec. 10.2 by revising paragraph (e) and adding paragraph
(g)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(e)(1) What is cultural affiliation? Cultural affiliation means
that there is a relationship of shared group identity which can be
reasonably traced historically or prehistorically between members of a
present-day Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and an
identifiable earlier group. Cultural affiliation is established when
the preponderance of the evidence--based on geographical, kinship,
biological, archeological, anthropological, linguistic, folklore, oral
tradition, historical evidence, or other information or expert
opinion--reasonably leads to such a conclusion.
(2) What does culturally unidentifiable mean? Culturally
unidentifiable refers to human remains and associated funerary objects
in museum or Federal agency collections for which no lineal descendant
or culturally affiliated Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization
has been identified.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(5) Disposition means the transfer of control over Native American
human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of
cultural patrimony by a museum or Federal agency under this part. This
part establishes disposition procedures for several different
situations:
(i) Custody of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, and
objects of cultural patrimony excavated intentionally from, or
discovered inadvertently on Federal or tribal lands after November 16,
1990 is established under Sec. 10.6;
(ii) Repatriation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred
objects, and objects of cultural patrimony in museum and Federal agency
collections to a lineal descendant or culturally affiliated Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization is established under Sec. 10.10.
(iii) Disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains, with
or without associated funerary objects, in museum or Federal agency
collections is established under Sec. 10.11.
4. Amend 10.9 by revising paragraphs (e)(2), (5), and (6) as
follows:
Sec. 10.9 Inventories.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) The notice of inventory completion must:
(i) Summarize the contents of the inventory in sufficient detail so
as to enable the recipients to determine their interest in claiming the
inventoried items;
(ii) Identify each particular set of human remains or each
associated funerary object and the circumstances surrounding its
acquisition;
(iii) Describe the human remains or associated funerary objects
that are clearly identifiable as to cultural affiliation;
(iv) Describe the human remains or associated funerary objects that
are not clearly identifiable as culturally affiliated with an Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization, but that are likely to be
culturally affiliated with a particular Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization given the totality of circumstances surrounding
acquisition of the human remains or associated objects; and
(v) Describe those human remains, with or without associated
funerary objects, that are culturally unidentifiable but that may be
transferred under Sec. 10.11.
(3) * * *
(4) * * *
(5) Upon request by an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization
that has received or should have received a notice and inventory under
paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section, a museum or Federal
agency must supply additional available documentation.
(i) For purposes of this paragraph, ``documentation'' means a
summary of existing museum or Federal agency records including
inventories or catalogues, relevant studies, or other pertinent data
for the limited purpose of determining the geographical origin,
cultural affiliation, and basic facts surrounding the acquisition and
accession of human remains and associated funerary objects.
(ii) Documentation supplied under this paragraph is considered a
public record except as exempted under relevant laws. Neither a request
for documentation nor any other provisions of this part may be
construed as authorizing either:
(A) The initiation of new scientific studies of the human remains
and associated funerary objects; or
(B) Other means of acquiring or preserving additional scientific
information from such remains and objects.
(6) If the museum or Federal agency official determines that the
museum or Federal agency has possession of or control over human
remains, with or without associated funerary objects, that cannot be
identified as affiliated with a lineal descendent, Indian tribes, or
Native Hawaiian organizations, the museum or Federal agency must
provide the Manager, National NAGPRA Program notice of this result and
a copy of the list of such culturally unidentifiable human remains and
any associated funerary objects. The Manager, National NAGPRA Program
must make this information available to members of the Review
Committee. Culturally unidentifiable human remains, with or without
associated funerary objects, are subject to disposition under Sec.
10.11.
* * * * *
5. Add Sec. 10.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 10.11 Disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains.
(a) General. This section implements section 8 (c)(5) of the Act.
(b) Consultation. (1) The museum or Federal agency official must
initiate consultation regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects:
(i) Within ninety (90) days of receipt of a request from an Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization to transfer control of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects; or
(ii) Absent such a request, before any offer to transfer control of
culturally unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary
objects.
(2) The museum or Federal agency official must initiate
consultation with officials and traditional religious leaders of all
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations:
(i) From whose tribal lands, at the time of the removal, the human
remains and associated funerary objects were removed;
(ii) From whose aboriginal lands the human remains and associated
funerary objects were removed. Aboriginal occupation may be recognized
by a final judgment of the Indian Claims
[[Page 58589]]
Commission or the United States Court of Claims, or a treaty, Act of
Congress, or Executive Order; and
(iii)(A) With a cultural relationship to the region from which the
human remains and associated funerary objects were removed; or
(B) In the case of human remains and associated funerary objects
lacking geographic affiliation, with a cultural relationship to the
region in which the museum or Federal agency repository is located.
(3) The museum or Federal agency official must provide the
following information in writing to all Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations with which the museum or Federal agency
consults:
(i) A list of all Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations
that are being, or have been, consulted regarding the particular human
remains and associated funerary objects;
(ii) A list of any non-federally recognized Indian groups that are
known to have a relationship of shared group identity with the
particular human remains and associated funerary objects; and
(iii) An offer to provide a copy of the original inventory and
additional documentation regarding the particular human remains and
associated funerary objects.
(4) During consultation, museum and Federal agency officials must
request, as appropriate, the following information from Indian tribes
and Native Hawaiian organizations:
(i) The name and address of the Indian tribe official to act as
representative in consultations related to particular human remains and
associated funerary objects;
(ii) The names and appropriate methods to contact any traditional
religious leaders who should be consulted regarding the human remains
and associated funerary objects;
(iii) Temporal and/or geographic criteria that the museum or
Federal agency should use to identify groups of human remains and
associated funerary objects for consultation;
(iv) The names and addresses of other Indian tribes, Native
Hawaiian organizations, or non-federally recognized Indian groups that
should be included in the consultations; and
(v) A schedule and process for consultation.
(5) During consultation, the museum or Federal agency official
should seek to develop a proposed disposition for culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects that is
mutually agreeable to the parties specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section. The agreement must be consistent with this part.
(6) If consultation results in a determination that human remains
and associated funerary objects previously determined to be culturally
unidentifiable are actually culturally affiliated with an Indian tribe
or Native Hawaiian organization, the notification and repatriation of
the human remains and associated funerary objects must be completed as
required by Sec. 10.9 (e) and Sec. 10.10 (b).
(c) Disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains and
associated funerary objects. (1) A museum or Federal agency that is
unable to prove that it has right of possession, as defined at Sec.
10.10 (a)(2), to culturally unidentifiable human remains must offer to
transfer control of the human remains to Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations in the following priority order:
(i) The Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization from whose
tribal land, at the time of the excavation or removal, the human
remains were removed;
(ii) The Indian tribe or tribes that are recognized as aboriginally
occupying the area from which the human remains were removed.
Aboriginal occupation may be recognized by a final judgment of the
Indian Claims Commission or the United States Court of Claims, or a
treaty, Act of Congress, or Executive Order; or
(iii) The Indian tribe and Native Hawaiian organization with:
(A) A cultural relationship to the region from which the human
remains were removed, or
(B) For human remains lacking geographic affiliation, a cultural
relationship to the region in which the museum or Federal agency with
control over the human remains is located.
(iv) If it can be shown by a preponderance of the evidence that
another Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization has a stronger
cultural relationship with the human remains than an entity specified
in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) or (c)(1)(iii) of this section, the Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that has the strongest
demonstrated cultural relationship, if upon notice, the Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization claims the human remains.
(2) Any disposition of human remains excavated or removed from
``Indian lands'' as defined by the Archaeological Resources Protection
Act (16 U.S.C. 470bb (4)) must also comply with the provisions of that
statute and its implementing regulations.
(3) If none of the Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations
identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section agrees to accept
control, a museum or Federal agency may, upon receiving a
recommendation from the Secretary or authorized representative:
(i) Transfer control of culturally unidentifiable human remains to
a non-federally recognized Indian group, or
(ii) Reinter culturally unidentifiable human remains according to
State or other law.
(4) The Secretary may make a recommendation under paragraph (c)(3)
of this section only with the written consent of all Indian tribes and
Native Hawaiian organizations stipulated in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this section.
(5) A museum or Federal agency may also transfer control of
funerary objects that are associated with culturally unidentifiable
human remains. The Secretary recommends that museums and Federal
agencies engage in such transfers whenever Federal or State law would
not otherwise preclude them.
(d) Notification. (1) Disposition of culturally unidentifiable
human remains and associated funerary objects under paragraph (c) may
not occur until at least thirty (30) days after publication of a notice
of inventory completion in the Federal Register as described in Sec.
10.9.
(2) Within 30 days of publishing the notice of inventory
completion, the National NAGPRA Program manager must:
(i) Revise the Review Committee inventory of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects to
indicate the notice's publication; and
(ii) Make the revised Review Committee inventory of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects accessible
to Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, non-federally
recognized Indian groups, museums, and Federal agencies.
(e) Disputes. Any person who wishes to contest actions taken by
museums or Federal agencies regarding the disposition of culturally
unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects is
encouraged to do so through informal negotiations to achieve a fair
resolution of the matter. The Review Committee may facilitate the
informal resolution of such disputes that are not resolved by good
faith negotiation under Sec. 10.17. In addition, the United States
District Courts have jurisdiction over any action brought that alleges
a violation of the Act.
6. Amend Sec. 10.12 by:
[[Page 58590]]
A. Revising paragraphs (b)(ii), (iii), and (iv), and
B. Adding paragraph (b)(ix) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.12 Civil penalties.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) After November 16, 1993, or a date specified under Sec.
10.13, whichever deadline is applicable, has not completed summaries as
required by the Act; or
(iii) After November 16, 1995, or a date specified under Sec.
10.13, or the date specified in an extension issued by the Secretary,
whichever deadline is applicable, has not completed inventories as
required by the Act; or
(iv) After May 16, 1996, or 6 months after completion of an
inventory under an extension issued by the Secretary, or 6 months after
the date specified under Sec. 10.13, whichever deadline is applicable,
has not notified culturally affiliated Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations; or
* * * * *
(ix) Does not offer to transfer control of culturally
unidentifiable human remains for which it cannot prove right of
possession under Sec. 10.11.
* * * * *
Dated: October 2, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-20209 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P