Safety Zone; Queensway Bay, Long Beach, CA, 56898-56901 [E7-19675]
Download as PDF
56898
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: September 26, 2007.
Bernadette Dunham,
Deputy Director, Center for Veterinary
Medicine.
[FR Doc. E7–19732 Filed 10–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. CGD08–07–022]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Milhomme Bayou, Stephensville, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations; request for comments.
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
evaluating this test schedule by
submitting comments and related
material. If you do so, please include
your name and address, identify the
docket number for this deviation
[CGD08–07–022], indicate the specific
section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason
for each comment. Please submit all
comments and related material in an
unbound format, no larger than 8 by 11
inches, suitable for copying. If you
would like to know they reached us,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. Comments
must be received by December 4, 2007.
Background and Purpose
ACTION:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
St. Martin Parish has requested that
the operating regulation on the
Stephensville Bridge be changed in
order to operate the bridge more
efficiently. The Stephensville Bridge is
located on Milhomme Bayou at mile
12.2 in Stephensville, St. Martin Parish,
Louisiana. The Bridge has a vertical
clearance of 5.8 feet above mean high
water, an elevation of 3.5 feet Mean Sea
Level (MSL) in the closed position and
unlimited in the open position. The
Stephensville Bridge opens on signal as
required by 33 CFR 117.5. This
operating schedule has been in effect
since 2002 when this bridge replaced an
existing bridge in the area.
The previous bridge’s operating
schedule was, ‘‘shall open on signal;
except that, from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. the
draw shall open on signal if at least two
hours notice is given. During the
advance notice period, the draw shall
open on less than two hours notice for
an emergency and shall open on
demand should a temporary surge in
waterway traffic occur.’’
Since the completion of the current
bridge, the waterway traffic has been
minimal and during the past twelve
months an average of 5 boats per day
have requested an opening. Most of the
boats requesting openings are
commercial vessels consisting of
tugboats with barges and shrimp
trawlers that routinely transit this
waterway and are able to give advance
notice.
Due to this waterway being a
secondary route, the Port Allen
Alternate route is the primary route,
little impact is expected on navigation
during this test schedule period. Also,
prior coordination with the main
waterway user group in the area
indicates no expected impacts.
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the
Stephensville Bridge across Milhomme
Bayou, mile 12.2, at Stephensville, St.
Martin Parish, Louisiana. This deviation
will test a change to the drawbridge
operation schedule to determine
whether a permanent change to the
schedule is needed. The deviation will
allow the draw of the Stephensville
Bridge to open on signal if at least one
hour of advance notice is given. During
the advance notice period, the draw
shall open on less than one hour notice
for an emergency and shall open on
demand should a temporary surge in
waterway traffic occur.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
October 5, 2007 until April 2, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bart
Marcules, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone (504) 671–2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A Notice of Proposed Rule Making
[CGD08–07–023], is being issued in
conjunction with this Temporary
Deviation to obtain public comments.
The Coast Guard will evaluate public
comments from this Temporary
Deviation and the above referenced
Notice of Proposed Rule Making to
determine if a permanent special
drawbridge operating regulation is
warranted.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: September 21, 2007.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 07–4860 Filed 10–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP LA–LB 07–004]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Queensway Bay, Long
Beach, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the Long Beach Harbor to encompass
the waters between Queensway Bay to
Island White at Long Beach harbor for
the Annual Los Angeles and Long Beach
Tug Boat Race. This safety zone is
needed to prevent vessels from
transiting the area during the race in
order to protect vessels and personnel
from potential damage and injury. Entry
into this safety zone will be prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Los Angeles-Long
Beach, or his on-scene representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
to 7 p.m. on September 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket COTP LA–LB
07–004 and are available for inspection
or copying at Sector Los Angeles—Long
Beach, 1001 S. Seaside Ave, San Pedro,
CA 90731 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander Peter Gooding,
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Chief of the Waterways Management
Division at (310) 732–2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing
a NPRM, which would incorporate a
comment period before a final rule
could be issued, and delaying the rule’s
effective date is contrary to public safety
because immediate action is necessary
to protect the public and waters of the
United States.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause
exists for making this rule effective
fewer than 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register. Delaying this rule
would be contrary to the public interest
of ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible
loss of life or property. This temporary
safety zone should have minimal
negative impact on the public and
navigation because it will be enforced
for only a two hour period on one day.
In addition, the area restricted by the
safety zone is minimal, allowing vessels
to transit around the safety zone to pass.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Background and Purpose
On September 27, 2007, the Annual
Port of Los Angeles and Long Beach Tug
Boat Races will be held in the vicinity
of Queensway Bay, Echo anchorages,
and to extend around Island White. The
Captain of the Port is establishing a
safety zone to prevent vessels from
transiting the area and to protect vessels
and personnel from potential damage
and injury resulting from the race.
Discussion of Rule
This safety zone includes the waters
of the Long Beach Harbor within the
boundaries defined by a line drawn
from a point located at 33°45′11″ N,
118°11′14″ W; then south to a point
located at 33°44′40″ N, 118°11′00″ W;
then northeast to a point located at
33°45′03″ N, 118°09′19″ W; then north
to a point located at 33°45′19″ N,
118°09′28″ W; then west back toward
the starting point to 33°45′11″ N,
118°11′14″ W [NAD 1983].
Vessels are excluded from the area
encompassed by this safety zone from 5
p.m. to 7 p.m. on September 27, 2007.
Persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering into or transiting through this
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his on-scene
representative. By prohibiting all vessel
traffic from entering the waters
surrounding this event, the safety of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
race personnel and the public will be
enhanced. U.S. Coast Guard personnel
will enforce this safety zone.
The Captain of the Port may, in his
discretion grant waivers or exemptions
to this rule, either on a case-by-case
basis or categorically to a particular
class of vessel that otherwise is subject
to adequate control measures.
The Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to further
ensure the local boating traffic is aware
of the safety zone and its geographical
boundaries. Vessels or persons violating
this section will be subject to both
criminal and civil penalties.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although the safety zone will restrict
boating traffic within the navigable
waters of the Long Beach Harbor
between Queensway Bay and Island
White, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant as the safety zone will
encompass only a small portion of the
waterway and will be short in duration.
The entities most likely to be affected
are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing.
As such, the Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this rule to be
minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of entities. This rule
will affect the following entities, some
of which may be small entities: The
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in the affected
portion of the Long Beach Harbor from
5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on September 27, 2007.
Although the safety zone will restrict
boating traffic within the navigable
waters of Long Beach Harbor in the
vicinity of Queensway Bay east around
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56899
Island White, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant as the
safety zone will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway and will be
short in duration. The entities most
likely to be affected are small
commercial and pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities and
sightseeing. As such, the Coast Guard
expects the economic impact of this rule
to be minimal. This safety zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: The safety
zone only encompasses a small portion
of the waterway, it is short in duration,
vessel traffic can pass safely around the
safety zone, and the Captain of the Port
may authorize entry into the safety
zone, if necessary. Before the
enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories widely available to
users of this area. If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
Lieutenant Commander Peter Gooding,
at Coast Sector Los Angeles—Long
Beach, Waterways Management
Division, at telephone (310) 732–2020.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
56900
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
it establishes a safety zone.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226 and 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. Add § 165.T11–241 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T11–241 Safety Zone; Queensway
Bay Long Beach, California
(a) Location. The following area
comprises the geographical boundary of
a safety zone: All navigable waters of
the Pacific Ocean within the boundaries
defined by a line drawn from a point
located at 33°45′11″ N, 118°11′14″ W;
then south to a point located at
33°44′40″ N, 118°11′00″ W; then
northeast to a point located at 33°45′03″
N, 118°09′19″ W; then north to a point
located at 33°45′19″ N, 118°09′28″ W;
then west heading back toward the
starting point finishing at 33°45′11″ N,
118°11′14″ W [NAD 1983].
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.23
of this part, entry into, transit through,
or anchoring within this safety zone by
all vessels is prohibited, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP), or his on-scene representative.
(2) On-scene representative means
any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officer of the Coast Guard onboard a
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
local, state, or federal law enforcement
vessel authorized to act on behalf of the
COTP.
(3) Mariners may request permission
of the COTP, or his on-scene
representative to transit through the
safety zone. The COTP or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF–FM Channel 16.
(c) Enforcement. (1) All persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the COTP or his on-scene
representative.
(2) Upon being hailed by the COTP or
his on-scene representative by siren,
radio, flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(3) The Coast Guard may be assisted
in the patrol and enforcement of this
safety zone by other federal, state, or
local law enforcement as necessary.
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.
on September 27, 2007.
Dated: September 12, 2007.
P.E. Wiedenhoeft,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Los Angeles—Long Beach.
[FR Doc. E7–19675 Filed 10–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Standards for Mailing Lithium
Batteries
Postal Service.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Postal ServiceTM is
revising the standards for mailing
lithium and lithium-ion batteries. The
new standards identify all small
consumer-type lithium batteries as
mailable when properly packaged and
labeled.
Effective Date: October 5, 2007.
Bert
Olsen, 202–268–7276.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
We published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register (72 FR 20463, April 25,
2007) to revise the standards for mailing
lithium and lithium-ion batteries. The
standards published in the proposed
rule and adopted in this final rule, are
consistent with, yet slightly more
restrictive than, Department of
Transportation (DOT) and International
Air Transportation Association (IATA)
regulations for transportation of lithium
batteries. The new proposed standards
provide clearer guidance to mailers and
postal employees regarding the
mailability of consumer-type lithium
batteries than current standards provide.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Comments Received
We received comments from two
trade associations which were generally
supportive of the proposed standards.
Their comments and our responses
follow:
1. Comment: Do not limit the weight
of a mailpiece containing lithium-ion
batteries.
Within DOT regulations, the Postal
Service agrees not to limit the weight of
a mailpiece containing lithium-ion
batteries since the proposed rule
additionally limits the maximum
allowable gram equivalency to 8 grams
per battery and the maximum number of
batteries per mailpiece to 3. The gram
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
quantity restriction per cell and battery,
and the restriction on the number of
batteries per mailpiece, ensures
compliance with DOT regulations.
Therefore, the final rule does not
contain a maximum mailpiece weight
limit for packages containing lithiumion batteries.
2. Comment: Do not restrict the
number of lithium-ion batteries to the
number of batteries needed to operate
the device.
Within DOT regulations, the Postal
Service agrees not to limit the number
of lithium-ion batteries that can be
mailed to the number of batteries
needed to operate the device since the
proposal already limits the number of
batteries per mailpiece to 3. Therefore,
the final rule does not restrict the
number of lithium-ion batteries to the
number needed to operate the device
but rather limits the number of lithiumion batteries per mailpiece to 3.
3. Comment: Do not restrict the
mailing of primary lithium batteries to
those only in their original retail
packaging.
The Postal Service believes that the
requirement to mail primary batteries in
the original packaging offers assurance
of adequate primary packaging.
However, we are changing the final rule
to read, ‘‘in the originally sealed
packaging’’ regardless of the source of
the packaging to allow for originally
sealed packaging from sources other
than retailers.
4. Comment: USPS required labeling:
‘‘Surface Mail Only,’’ in addition to
DOT labeling: ‘‘Primary Lithium
Batteries—Forbidden for Transportation
Aboard Passenger Aircraft,’’ is
redundant and will add to the cost of
the label.
The Postal Service believes labels that
read ‘‘Surface Mail Only’’ are known to
postal employees and quickly
recognized. Therefore, the final rule
adopts the standards to require labeling
as published in the proposal.
5. Comment: USPS should not require
package labeling in excess of current
DOT requirements.
DOT has announced their revised
labeling requirements will be effective
January 1, 2008. Postal labeling
requirements will reflect DOT changes.
In addition, the Postal Service believes
that requiring labeling of mailpieces
containing secondary as well as primary
batteries and cells is a cautionary
measure that identifies the content of
the package. Therefore, the final rule
adopts the standards to require labeling
as published in the proposal.
6. Comment: Mailpieces containing
primary lithium batteries should not be
limited to 5 pounds. The DOT weight
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56901
limit is 11 pounds of batteries in a
shipping container and the Postal
Service should adopt the same
requirements.
The Postal Service believes it is not
practical for postal personnel to discern
the aggregate weight of batteries within
a mailpiece. We believe that mailpieces
containing individual batteries (batteries
not packed with or installed in
equipment) should not exceed 5
pounds. However, we recognize that
when batteries are packed with or
contained in devices, the devices
themselves could easily account for the
majority of the weight of a mailpiece
and easily exceed 5 pounds. Therefore,
the final rule adopts a 5 pound
maximum mailpiece weight limit when
primary batteries are not packed with or
installed in the devices they operate and
an 11 pound mailpiece weight limit
when batteries are packed with or
installed in the device they operate.
7. Comment: Do not prohibit damaged
or recalled batteries from being mailed.
The Postal Service is not prohibiting
the mailing of damaged or recalled
batteries, but rather we are requiring
that these batteries be mailed only with
prior approval from the manager,
Mailing Standards. Therefore, the final
rule adopts the standard for mailing
damaged or recalled batteries as
published in the proposed rule.
Lithium batteries other than small
consumer-type batteries remain
nonmailable.
We adopt the following amendments
to Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail
Manual (DMM), incorporated by
reference in the Code of Federal
Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1, 111.4.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
I Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is
amended as follows:
PART 111—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 111 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3626, 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of the
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
I
600 Basic Standards for All Mailing
Services
601
Mailability
*
*
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
*
05OCR1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 193 (Friday, October 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56898-56901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-19675]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP LA-LB 07-004]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Queensway Bay, Long Beach, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
Long Beach Harbor to encompass the waters between Queensway Bay to
Island White at Long Beach harbor for the Annual Los Angeles and Long
Beach Tug Boat Race. This safety zone is needed to prevent vessels from
transiting the area during the race in order to protect vessels and
personnel from potential damage and injury. Entry into this safety zone
will be prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Los Angeles-Long Beach, or his on-scene representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on September 27,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket COTP LA-LB 07-004 and are available for
inspection or copying at Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach, 1001 S.
Seaside Ave, San Pedro, CA 90731 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Peter Gooding,
[[Page 56899]]
Chief of the Waterways Management Division at (310) 732-2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing a NPRM, which would
incorporate a comment period before a final rule could be issued, and
delaying the rule's effective date is contrary to public safety because
immediate action is necessary to protect the public and waters of the
United States.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for making this rule
effective fewer than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying this rule would be contrary to the public interest of ensuring
the safety of spectators and vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life or property. This
temporary safety zone should have minimal negative impact on the public
and navigation because it will be enforced for only a two hour period
on one day. In addition, the area restricted by the safety zone is
minimal, allowing vessels to transit around the safety zone to pass.
Background and Purpose
On September 27, 2007, the Annual Port of Los Angeles and Long
Beach Tug Boat Races will be held in the vicinity of Queensway Bay,
Echo anchorages, and to extend around Island White. The Captain of the
Port is establishing a safety zone to prevent vessels from transiting
the area and to protect vessels and personnel from potential damage and
injury resulting from the race.
Discussion of Rule
This safety zone includes the waters of the Long Beach Harbor
within the boundaries defined by a line drawn from a point located at
33[deg]45'11'' N, 118[deg]11'14'' W; then south to a point located at
33[deg]44'40'' N, 118[deg]11'00'' W; then northeast to a point located
at 33[deg]45'03'' N, 118[deg]09'19'' W; then north to a point located
at 33[deg]45'19'' N, 118[deg]09'28'' W; then west back toward the
starting point to 33[deg]45'11'' N, 118[deg]11'14'' W [NAD 1983].
Vessels are excluded from the area encompassed by this safety zone
from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on September 27, 2007. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into or transiting through this safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his on-scene
representative. By prohibiting all vessel traffic from entering the
waters surrounding this event, the safety of the race personnel and the
public will be enhanced. U.S. Coast Guard personnel will enforce this
safety zone.
The Captain of the Port may, in his discretion grant waivers or
exemptions to this rule, either on a case-by-case basis or
categorically to a particular class of vessel that otherwise is subject
to adequate control measures.
The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to
further ensure the local boating traffic is aware of the safety zone
and its geographical boundaries. Vessels or persons violating this
section will be subject to both criminal and civil penalties.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although the safety zone will restrict boating traffic within the
navigable waters of the Long Beach Harbor between Queensway Bay and
Island White, the effect of this regulation will not be significant as
the safety zone will encompass only a small portion of the waterway and
will be short in duration. The entities most likely to be affected are
pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing. As
such, the Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be
minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the affected portion of the Long Beach Harbor from
5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on September 27, 2007. Although the safety zone will
restrict boating traffic within the navigable waters of Long Beach
Harbor in the vicinity of Queensway Bay east around Island White, the
effect of this regulation will not be significant as the safety zone
will encompass only a small portion of the waterway and will be short
in duration. The entities most likely to be affected are small
commercial and pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities and
sightseeing. As such, the Coast Guard expects the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal. This safety zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons: The safety zone only encompasses a small portion of
the waterway, it is short in duration, vessel traffic can pass safely
around the safety zone, and the Captain of the Port may authorize entry
into the safety zone, if necessary. Before the enforcement period, we
will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of this area.
If the event concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Lieutenant Commander Peter
Gooding, at Coast Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach, Waterways Management
Division, at telephone (310) 732-2020.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork
[[Page 56900]]
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation because it establishes a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226 and 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-241 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-241 Safety Zone; Queensway Bay Long Beach, California
(a) Location. The following area comprises the geographical
boundary of a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Pacific Ocean
within the boundaries defined by a line drawn from a point located at
33[deg]45'11'' N, 118[deg]11'14'' W; then south to a point located at
33[deg]44'40'' N, 118[deg]11'00'' W; then northeast to a point located
at 33[deg]45'03'' N, 118[deg]09'19'' W; then north to a point located
at 33[deg]45'19'' N, 118[deg]09'28'' W; then west heading back toward
the starting point finishing at 33[deg]45'11'' N, 118[deg]11'14'' W
[NAD 1983].
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transit through, or anchoring
within this safety zone by all vessels is prohibited, unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP), or his on-scene representative.
(2) On-scene representative means any commissioned, warrant, and
petty officer of the Coast Guard onboard a Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, local, state, or federal law enforcement vessel authorized
to act on behalf of the COTP.
(3) Mariners may request permission of the COTP, or his on-scene
representative to transit through the safety zone. The COTP or his on-
scene representative may be contacted via VHF-FM Channel 16.
(c) Enforcement. (1) All persons and vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the COTP or his on-scene representative.
(2) Upon being hailed by the COTP or his on-scene representative by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(3) The Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of this safety zone by other federal, state, or local law enforcement
as necessary.
[[Page 56901]]
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 5 p.m.
to 7 p.m. on September 27, 2007.
Dated: September 12, 2007.
P.E. Wiedenhoeft,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Los Angeles--Long
Beach.
[FR Doc. E7-19675 Filed 10-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P