Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Congress-Bundestag Youth Exchange Program, 56818-56824 [E7-19642]
Download as PDF
56818
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5951]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Congress-Bundestag Youth
Exchange Program
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–08–08.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.410.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: November 8,
2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs
Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), of the
Department of State’s Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for the
Congress-Bundestag Youth Exchange
Program (CBYX). Public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
facilitate educational exchanges
between American and German high
school students and young
professionals.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: The CBYX program supports
the exchange of American and German
young people in order to sustain and
strengthen German-American friendship
based on common values of democracy,
and to convey lasting personal and
institutional relationships to the
successor generation. The primary
objective of the program is to encourage
American and German youth to learn
about each other’s society and culture
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
through educational exchange.
Additional goals for this competition
include a renewed effort to promote the
participants’ roles as young
ambassadors and the impact they can
have on US-German relations, and to
strengthen the linkages between U.S.
Representatives and their Bundestag
counterparts. The program provides a
full scholarship for an academic year
experience of living and studying in the
host country.
The Department of State, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
administers the CBYX program in the
United States. The program is known in
Germany as the Parlamentarisches
Patenschafts-Program (PPP), and is
administered by the German Bundestag
Administrative Office (WI4).
Inaugurated in 1983 through a
bilateral agreement between the U.S.
Congress and the German Bundestag,
each government provides funding to
exchange organizations through
assistance awards for the costs of
participant recruitment and selection,
international airfare, orientation and
debriefing, and hosting support for the
respective exchange participants.
The U.S.-German agreement calls for
an open grants competition every four
years, and WI4 is holding a
simultaneous open competition to select
the German counterpart organizations
that will manage the program in
Germany. Up to five German high
school exchange organizations will be
partnered with five American high
school exchange organizations, and one
German vocational and one German
young professionals exchange
organization will be paired with
American exchange organizations.
Within the proposal narrative
organizations should name their
intended German partner organization
and provide pertinent institutional
background and support materials as
appropriate, and demonstrate your
ability to cooperate with foreign
partners in implementing exchanges.
Pending the availability of funds,
organizations that are successful in this
competition will be awarded grants in
FY2009 for academic year 2009–10.
Pending successful implementation of
this program and the availability of
funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA’s intent to renew the grants for
three additional fiscal years before
openly competing them again. All grants
will be subject to availability of funds.
Please note: At the time of publication,
funds have not been appropriated to support
this program. As is the case with all Bureau
assistance awards, final awards cannot be
made until funds have been appropriated by
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Congress, allocated and committed through
internal Bureau procedures.
According to the agreement between
the State Department and the Bundestag
WI4, the maximum number of
participants to be exchanged in any
given year is 400 Germans and 400
Americans. However, the actual number
of participants exchanged each year is
dependent on the amount of funding
made available by the U.S. Congress and
the German Bundestag. Though
Congress has not yet determined the
budget level for FY2009, the
competition for program year 2009–10
will be based on up to 350 American
and 360 German participants.
Throughout the four-year grant cycle,
representatives of both governments and
the respective grantee organizations will
hold annual discussions to determine
the final participant numbers for each
academic year.
Participants are chosen according to
procedures and criteria established by
each government. In the U.S. the CBYX
program has three components.
1. High School Component: In FY
2009 this component may provide a
maximum of 250 (50 per each
organization) scholarships for a one-year
educational and cultural homestay
experience in Germany for American
high school students ages 15–18, and
reciprocally, host a maximum of 285 (57
per each organization) German students
in the U.S. High school exchange
organizations are invited to bid on
conducting merit-based competitions
among American high school students
in one or more of five designated
regions of the United States, as follows:
Northeast: Maine, New Hampshire,
Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New York, New Jersey,
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington, DC,
Delaware, Maryland.
Southeast: Arkansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky,
Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia,
Florida, Puerto Rico.
Central States: Indiana, Illinois,
Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa,
Missouri, Nebraska.
Southwest: Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma,
Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona,
Southern California* (*the northern
border of this region includes the
counties of Monterey, San Benito,
Fresno, and Inyo).
Pacific/Northwest: Alaska, Hawaii,
Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana,
Wyoming, Nevada, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Northern California* (*the
southern border of this region includes
the counties of Santa Cruz, Santa Clara,
Merced, Madera, and Mono).
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
American high school exchange
organizations may bid on more than one
region, indicating the most preferred
region(s) in priority order. Five
organizations will be selected to
conduct all aspects of the recruitment
and selection of 50 American
participants in one of the five regions.
In coordination with its German partner
organization, high school organizations
will program 50 American and 57
German students. German students may
be placed in host homes and schools
throughout the U.S.
Organizations that are awarded a
grant will conduct advertising,
recruitment, processing of applications,
screening, selection, pre-departure,
arrival, and re-entry orientations, and
management of all administrative and
logistical matters including domestic
and international travel.
In the host country, American and
German partner organizations will
coordinate arrival and re-entry
orientation for the respective exchange
students, placement of the students in
host families and schools (nationwide),
arrange program enrichment activities,
conduct the recruitment, screening,
including criminal background checks,
selection and orientation of hostfamilies, provide program monitoring,
supervision and counseling to students
and host families, and manage all
administrative and logistical matters
including in-country travel and health
and accident insurance.
For the German participants grantee
organizations should secure all host
family and school placements at least
two weeks prior to the German students’
arrival in the United States.
Organizations will be required to submit
to the program office a list of these
placements (host families, host schools,
and corresponding Congressional
representatives/districts) no later than
August 31 and periodically update the
information throughout the year.
Grantee organizations will submit to
the Department of State program office,
at least 60 days after departure/arrival
data lists of all current American
participants with U.S. addresses, names
of parents and corresponding
Congressional representatives/districts.
2. Vocational Component: This
component provides scholarships to
graduating American high-school
seniors with a vocational specialization
for a one-year professional study and
training experience in their fields of
interest in Germany. One organization
will be selected to conduct all aspects
of the nationwide selection competition
in the U.S. for 25 American students
and programming, including
advertising, recruitment, processing of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
applications, screening, selection, predeparture orientations, and management
of all administrative and logistical
matters including domestic and
international travel. (During the
selection process the grantee is
encouraged to work with vocational
educational offices at the state level, as
well as administrators of secondary
schools with vocational education
curriculum.)
The German partner organization
chosen by the Bundestag Administrative
Office will coordinate arrival and reentry orientation for the students and
their placement in host families and
schools, arrange a practicum in the
participants’ field of study, arrange
program enrichment activities, and
conduct the recruitment, screening,
selection and orientation of host
families, provide program monitoring,
supervision and counseling to students
and host families, and manage all
administrative and logistical matters
including in-country travel and health
and accident insurance.
The vocational grantee organization
will submit to the Department of State
program office, at least 60 days after
departure/arrival a data list of all
current American participants with U.S.
addresses, names of parents and
corresponding Congressional
representatives/districts.
3. Young Professionals Component:
This component provides scholarships
for a one-year professional study and
training experience in the host country
in business, technical, vocational, and
agricultural fields to young American
and German students ages 18–24. One
organization will be selected to conduct
all aspects of programming for 75
American and 75 German Young
Professionals, including the nationwide
competition for the Americans and
placement of the German students in
American homes and schools,
advertising, recruitment, processing of
applications, screening, selection and
pre-departure orientations and
debriefings, and management of all
administrative and logistical matters
including domestic and international
travel.
In the host country, the American and
German partner organization will
coordinate arrival and re-entry
orientation for the students, the
placement of the students in host
families (or other suitable living
quarters) and schools (colleges/
universities), arrange a practicum in the
participants’ field of study, arrange
program enrichment activities, and
conduct the recruitment, screening,
selection and orientation of host
families, provide program monitoring,
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56819
supervision and counseling to students
and host families, and manage all
administrative and logistical matters
including in-country travel and health
and accident insurance.
In the United States, each German
young professional participant will be
placed in a two-or four-year college for
one semester of full-time study or a
minimum of 12 credit hours (which may
include an English class) throughout the
academic year. The organization is
encouraged to seek tuition waivers and
cost sharing with cooperating colleges.
The organization will coordinate with
each participant to assure that his/her
practicum is based on a prospectus of
the specific skills and functions that
will be mastered and that there is a
structured learning component that
enables the participant to gain a
perspective on the overall operation of
the business. The selected organization
will also coordinate a six-week
Congressional internship on Capitol Hill
or in the state office for up to five
German young professionals.
A monthly stipend for some meals,
incidentals and reasonable local
transportation expenses may be
included in the budget, but it is
anticipated that the stipend would be
substantially reduced or eliminated
during the second half of the program
when the participants receive
allowances for living expenses from the
firms or agencies hosting their
practicum. The current stipend range is
$250 to $300 per the regional cost of
living. Where possible, hosting
arrangements should be found that do
not require subsidization.
The selected young professionals
organization will be required to submit
to the program office a list of the
German placements in the United States
(host homes and host schools and
corresponding Congressional
representatives/districts) no later than
August 31, and periodically update the
information throughout the year.
The young professionals organization
will submit to the Department of State
program office, at least 60 days after
departure/arrival data lists of all current
American participants with U.S.
addresses, names of parents and
corresponding Congressional
representatives/districts.
4. Administrative Supplementals: The
administrative supplemental will
provide funds to:
(1) One high school organization to
produce and distribute the high school
scholarship promotional materials and
maintain the CBYX High School
Scholarship application Web site, and
(2) One organization from either of the
three components to maintain the
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
56820
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
Congress-Bundestag Alumni Database
Web site for all CBYX participants.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
High School Scholarship Materials and
Web Site
In addition to the 20-page program
narrative, interested high school
organizations may submit a bid to
produce and distribute the high school
scholarship promotional materials and
maintain the High School scholarship
application Web site. The narrative for
the supplemental should not exceed
three pages and include a separate
budget projection. For budget/line-item
details please see the Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI). The
supplemental funds will be included in
the final grant agreement and listed as
a separate item of expenditure. The
Bureau anticipates funding this activity
at a level of approximately $53,200,
pending availability of funds.
The selected high school
‘‘administrative’’ organization will
coordinate with all of the high school
grantee organizations data/input for
production of the promotional
materials. Once the input is finalized
the administrative organization will
mass produce and distribute the
materials to the high school
organizations. This includes
advertisement brochures, posters, and
scholarship applications for recruiting
American high school students, and set
up/maintenance of the scholarship
application Web site. The Web site
advertises the same printed promotional
materials and allows interested students
to download applications and submit
them to the respective high school
organization responsible for recruiting
in the students’ home state.
Once the high school grantee
organizations receive the promotional
materials from the administrative
organization they will distribute the
materials to a wide audience within
their appointed region, including public
and private secondary schools, the
media, and key networks such as the
American Association of Teachers of
German. (Innovative methods of
publicizing the program are welcome,
within funding limitations.
Organizations are encouraged to utilize
their volunteer networks and alumni to
promote the program.)
Alumni Database Web Site
In addition to the 20-page program
narrative, interested organizations from
either of the three components may
submit a bid to set up and maintain the
CBYX Alumni Database Web site. The
narrative for the supplemental should
not exceed three pages and include a
separate budget projection. For budget/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
line-item details please see the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI). The supplemental funds will be
included in the final grant agreement
and listed as a separate item of
expenditure. The Bureau anticipates
funding this activity at a level of
approximately $10,000, pending
availability of funds.
The organization selected to maintain
the Congress-Bundestag Alumni
Database Web site for all CBYX
participants will set up and maintain a
Web-based listing of CBYX participants
designed to centrally harness alumni
and encourage activities beyond their
participation in the program. The
organization select for this
supplemental will coordinate
participant/alumni lists will all CBYX
organizations to assure students’
eligibility and accuracy.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2009.
Approximate Total Funding:
Unknown at this time, pending a FY–
2009 Congressional Appropriation.
However, for proposal development
purposes, the total FY–2007 funding
level was $3,256,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 7 (5
High School Component, 1 Young
Professionals Component, 1 Vocational
Component).
Approximate Average Award:
Unknown at this time, pending a FY–
2009 Congressional Appropriation.
Anticipated Award Date: January
2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
August 2011.
Additional Information: Final funding
will be pending a FY 2009
Congressional Appropriation. However,
for illustrative purposes, the current
average per capita costs for each
program component are: $4,545 for the
high school component, $5,698 for the
young professionals component, and
$3,900 for the vocational component.
Applicants’ budget submissions should
be realistic and reflect anticipated actual
costs required to implement the
program(s) and the varying costs
specific to the German participants’
hosting needs, and the American
participants’ programming needs.
Budget submissions under this RFGP
may be subject to renegotiation. The
Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in
accordance with the needs of the
program and the availability of funds.
Budgets should be prepared according
to Tab D of the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI). You may delete or
modify line items according to program
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and administrative needs as described
in the proposal narrative. Please include
budget notes, as appropriate.
High school organizations should
prepare a budget to recruit/program 50
Americans and host 57 Germans;
vocational organizations should prepare
a budget to recruit/program 25
Americans; young professionals
organizations should prepare a budget
to recruit/program 75 Americans and 75
Germans.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Grants awarded to eligible
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen
Exchanges, Youth Programs Division,
ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
(202) 203–7527 and (202) 203–7529,
jonessa1@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C/PY–08–08 when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer
Shalita Jones and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY–08–
08 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
56821
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
including the oversight of their
Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, recordkeeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at #https://exchanges.state.gov
or from:
United States Department of State,
Office of Exchange Coordination and
Designation, ECA/EC/ECD–SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of
the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving grants
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects
that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62, et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places great emphasis
on the secure and proper administration
of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
and adherence by grantee program
organizations and program participants
to all regulations governing the J visa
program status. Therefore, proposals
should explicitly state in writing that the
applicant is prepared to assist the
Bureau in meeting all requirements
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth
in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization
has experience as a designated
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the
applicant should discuss their record of
compliance with 22 CFR part 62, et seq.,
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ’Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
56822
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the grantee will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable timeframe), the easier it
will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
the quality of your monitoring and evaluation
plan will be judged on how well it (1)
specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be
measured; (3) identifies when particular
outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides
a clear description of the data collection
strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys,
interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the first
level of outcomes [satisfaction] will be
deemed less competitive under the present
evaluation criteria.)
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget projection for the
entire program. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for allowable costs, complete
budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
Note: Final budgets will be solicited from
the selected grantees for FY 2009 (academic
year 2009–10) no later than fall 2009.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: November
8, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–
08–08.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 8 copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/PE/C/PY–08–08, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at
the U.S. Embassy for its review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system. Please
follow the instructions available in the
‘Get Started’ portion of the site (https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726,
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for grants resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the Program Idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Program Planning: Detailed agenda
and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan
should adhere to the program overview
and guidelines described above.
3. Ability To Achieve Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Proposals should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
4. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
5. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
6. Institutional Capacity: Proposed
personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project’s goals.
7. Institution’s Record/Ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
8. Follow-on Activities: Proposals
should provide a plan for continued
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56823
follow-on activity (without Bureau
support) ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
9. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
10. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead
and administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate.
11. Cost-sharing: Proposals should
maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
12. Value to U.S.-Partner Country
Relations: Proposed projects should
receive positive assessments by the U.S.
Department of State’s geographic area
desk and overseas officers of program
need, potential impact, and significance
in the partner country(ies).
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
56824
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm #articleI.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provided ECA with a hard
copy original plus one of the following
reports:
Mandatory:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial
reports which should include a
narrative of program activities and
financial expenditures according to the
proposed time line within the specified
quarter, as well as issues that may have
arisen and how they were handled,
lessons learned, etc., (see POGI for more
details).
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document. Reports may also be sent
electronically to reports@state.gov and
copied the program officer.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact Shalita Jones,
Program Officer, Office of Citizen
Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568,
ECA/PE/C/PY–08–08, U.S. Department
of State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, telephone (202)
203–7507 and fax number (202) 203–
7529, jonessa1@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
PY–08–08.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7–19642 Filed 10–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–28734; Notice 1]
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Receipt
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
DaimlerChrysler Corporation (DCC)
has determined that certain model year
2007 motor vehicles that it produced
between May 8, 2006 and March 16,
2007 do not comply with paragraph
S4.3(d) of 49 CFR 571.110, Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims for
Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of 4,536
Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less. DCC
has filed an appropriate report pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h), DCC has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This notice of receipt of DCC’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are a total of approximately
3,037 model year 2007 Dodge Dakota
(Dakota) pickup trucks produced
between May 8, 2006 and March 16,
2007. Paragraph S4.3(d) of FMVSS No.
110 requires:
Vehicles S4.3 Placard. Each vehicle, except
for a trailer or incomplete vehicle, shall show
the information specified in S4.3(a) through
(g),* * *
(d) Tire size designation, indicated by the
headings ‘‘size’’ or ‘‘original tire size’’ or
‘‘original size,’’ and ‘‘spare tire’’ or ‘‘spare,’’
for the tires installed at the time of the first
purchase for purposes other than resale. For
full size spare tires, the statement ‘‘see
above’’ may, at the manufacturer’s option
replace the tire size designation. If no spare
tire is provided, the word ‘‘none’’ must
replace the tire size designation;* * *
By way of background, DCC explains
that model year 2006 Dakotas were
equipped with five P265/65R17 tires—
the four tires installed on the vehicle at
time of sale and the spare tire. The
vehicle placard on the 2006 model year
Dakota accurately reflected the sizes of
the tires. DCC further explained that
they decided to equip the subsequent
model year 2007 Dakota with P265/
60R18 tires. However, prior to the actual
launch of the MY 2007 vehicles, DCC
discovered that a P265/60R18 tire
would not fit properly in the spare tire
location on the vehicle. Therefore, DCC
decided to retain the P265/65R17 tire as
the spare tire, while going forward with
the decision to use P265/60R18 tires as
in-service original equipment.
Unfortunately, the vehicle placards
affixed to the subject model year 2007
Dakotas were not revised to reflect the
decision to use the P265/65R17 spare
tire, therefore the vehicles do not
comply with S4.3(d).
DCC argues that the noncompliance,
the erroneous designation of the size of
the spare tire on the vehicle placard,
does not have any adverse safety
impact. In DCC’s estimation, the P265/
60R18 tire and the P265/65R17 tire are
equivalent. They support this estimation
by stating that the recommended cold
tire inflation pressure specified on the
vehicle placard—240 kPa (35 psi)—is
appropriate for either P265/60R18 or
P265/65R17 tires when mounted for
service on the Dakota, and that the Tire
& Rim Association Handbook confirms
that the P265/65R17 spare tire supplied
with the vehicles can carry more weight
at 35 psi (2,124 pounds) than the P265/
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56818-56824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-19642]
[[Page 56818]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5951]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Congress-Bundestag Youth Exchange Program
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.410.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: November 8, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs
Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), of the Department of State's Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open competition for the
Congress-Bundestag Youth Exchange Program (CBYX). Public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
facilitate educational exchanges between American and German high
school students and young professionals.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The CBYX program supports the exchange of American and
German young people in order to sustain and strengthen German-American
friendship based on common values of democracy, and to convey lasting
personal and institutional relationships to the successor generation.
The primary objective of the program is to encourage American and
German youth to learn about each other's society and culture through
educational exchange. Additional goals for this competition include a
renewed effort to promote the participants' roles as young ambassadors
and the impact they can have on US-German relations, and to strengthen
the linkages between U.S. Representatives and their Bundestag
counterparts. The program provides a full scholarship for an academic
year experience of living and studying in the host country.
The Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
administers the CBYX program in the United States. The program is known
in Germany as the Parlamentarisches Patenschafts-Program (PPP), and is
administered by the German Bundestag Administrative Office (WI4).
Inaugurated in 1983 through a bilateral agreement between the U.S.
Congress and the German Bundestag, each government provides funding to
exchange organizations through assistance awards for the costs of
participant recruitment and selection, international airfare,
orientation and debriefing, and hosting support for the respective
exchange participants.
The U.S.-German agreement calls for an open grants competition
every four years, and WI4 is holding a simultaneous open competition to
select the German counterpart organizations that will manage the
program in Germany. Up to five German high school exchange
organizations will be partnered with five American high school exchange
organizations, and one German vocational and one German young
professionals exchange organization will be paired with American
exchange organizations. Within the proposal narrative organizations
should name their intended German partner organization and provide
pertinent institutional background and support materials as
appropriate, and demonstrate your ability to cooperate with foreign
partners in implementing exchanges.
Pending the availability of funds, organizations that are
successful in this competition will be awarded grants in FY2009 for
academic year 2009-10. Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew the grants for three additional fiscal years
before openly competing them again. All grants will be subject to
availability of funds.
Please note: At the time of publication, funds have not been
appropriated to support this program. As is the case with all Bureau
assistance awards, final awards cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures.
According to the agreement between the State Department and the
Bundestag WI4, the maximum number of participants to be exchanged in
any given year is 400 Germans and 400 Americans. However, the actual
number of participants exchanged each year is dependent on the amount
of funding made available by the U.S. Congress and the German
Bundestag. Though Congress has not yet determined the budget level for
FY2009, the competition for program year 2009-10 will be based on up to
350 American and 360 German participants. Throughout the four-year
grant cycle, representatives of both governments and the respective
grantee organizations will hold annual discussions to determine the
final participant numbers for each academic year.
Participants are chosen according to procedures and criteria
established by each government. In the U.S. the CBYX program has three
components.
1. High School Component: In FY 2009 this component may provide a
maximum of 250 (50 per each organization) scholarships for a one-year
educational and cultural homestay experience in Germany for American
high school students ages 15-18, and reciprocally, host a maximum of
285 (57 per each organization) German students in the U.S. High school
exchange organizations are invited to bid on conducting merit-based
competitions among American high school students in one or more of five
designated regions of the United States, as follows:
Northeast: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode
Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Washington, DC, Delaware, Maryland.
Southeast: Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky,
Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Georgia, Florida, Puerto Rico.
Central States: Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin,
Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska.
Southwest: Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah,
Arizona, Southern California* (*the northern border of this region
includes the counties of Monterey, San Benito, Fresno, and Inyo).
Pacific/Northwest: Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, Idaho,
Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Northern
California* (*the southern border of this region includes the counties
of Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, Merced, Madera, and Mono).
[[Page 56819]]
American high school exchange organizations may bid on more than
one region, indicating the most preferred region(s) in priority order.
Five organizations will be selected to conduct all aspects of the
recruitment and selection of 50 American participants in one of the
five regions. In coordination with its German partner organization,
high school organizations will program 50 American and 57 German
students. German students may be placed in host homes and schools
throughout the U.S.
Organizations that are awarded a grant will conduct advertising,
recruitment, processing of applications, screening, selection, pre-
departure, arrival, and re-entry orientations, and management of all
administrative and logistical matters including domestic and
international travel.
In the host country, American and German partner organizations will
coordinate arrival and re-entry orientation for the respective exchange
students, placement of the students in host families and schools
(nationwide), arrange program enrichment activities, conduct the
recruitment, screening, including criminal background checks, selection
and orientation of host-families, provide program monitoring,
supervision and counseling to students and host families, and manage
all administrative and logistical matters including in-country travel
and health and accident insurance.
For the German participants grantee organizations should secure all
host family and school placements at least two weeks prior to the
German students' arrival in the United States. Organizations will be
required to submit to the program office a list of these placements
(host families, host schools, and corresponding Congressional
representatives/districts) no later than August 31 and periodically
update the information throughout the year.
Grantee organizations will submit to the Department of State
program office, at least 60 days after departure/arrival data lists of
all current American participants with U.S. addresses, names of parents
and corresponding Congressional representatives/districts.
2. Vocational Component: This component provides scholarships to
graduating American high-school seniors with a vocational
specialization for a one-year professional study and training
experience in their fields of interest in Germany. One organization
will be selected to conduct all aspects of the nationwide selection
competition in the U.S. for 25 American students and programming,
including advertising, recruitment, processing of applications,
screening, selection, pre-departure orientations, and management of all
administrative and logistical matters including domestic and
international travel. (During the selection process the grantee is
encouraged to work with vocational educational offices at the state
level, as well as administrators of secondary schools with vocational
education curriculum.)
The German partner organization chosen by the Bundestag
Administrative Office will coordinate arrival and re-entry orientation
for the students and their placement in host families and schools,
arrange a practicum in the participants' field of study, arrange
program enrichment activities, and conduct the recruitment, screening,
selection and orientation of host families, provide program monitoring,
supervision and counseling to students and host families, and manage
all administrative and logistical matters including in-country travel
and health and accident insurance.
The vocational grantee organization will submit to the Department
of State program office, at least 60 days after departure/arrival a
data list of all current American participants with U.S. addresses,
names of parents and corresponding Congressional representatives/
districts.
3. Young Professionals Component: This component provides
scholarships for a one-year professional study and training experience
in the host country in business, technical, vocational, and
agricultural fields to young American and German students ages 18-24.
One organization will be selected to conduct all aspects of programming
for 75 American and 75 German Young Professionals, including the
nationwide competition for the Americans and placement of the German
students in American homes and schools, advertising, recruitment,
processing of applications, screening, selection and pre-departure
orientations and debriefings, and management of all administrative and
logistical matters including domestic and international travel.
In the host country, the American and German partner organization
will coordinate arrival and re-entry orientation for the students, the
placement of the students in host families (or other suitable living
quarters) and schools (colleges/universities), arrange a practicum in
the participants' field of study, arrange program enrichment
activities, and conduct the recruitment, screening, selection and
orientation of host families, provide program monitoring, supervision
and counseling to students and host families, and manage all
administrative and logistical matters including in-country travel and
health and accident insurance.
In the United States, each German young professional participant
will be placed in a two-or four-year college for one semester of full-
time study or a minimum of 12 credit hours (which may include an
English class) throughout the academic year. The organization is
encouraged to seek tuition waivers and cost sharing with cooperating
colleges. The organization will coordinate with each participant to
assure that his/her practicum is based on a prospectus of the specific
skills and functions that will be mastered and that there is a
structured learning component that enables the participant to gain a
perspective on the overall operation of the business. The selected
organization will also coordinate a six-week Congressional internship
on Capitol Hill or in the state office for up to five German young
professionals.
A monthly stipend for some meals, incidentals and reasonable local
transportation expenses may be included in the budget, but it is
anticipated that the stipend would be substantially reduced or
eliminated during the second half of the program when the participants
receive allowances for living expenses from the firms or agencies
hosting their practicum. The current stipend range is $250 to $300 per
the regional cost of living. Where possible, hosting arrangements
should be found that do not require subsidization.
The selected young professionals organization will be required to
submit to the program office a list of the German placements in the
United States (host homes and host schools and corresponding
Congressional representatives/districts) no later than August 31, and
periodically update the information throughout the year.
The young professionals organization will submit to the Department
of State program office, at least 60 days after departure/arrival data
lists of all current American participants with U.S. addresses, names
of parents and corresponding Congressional representatives/districts.
4. Administrative Supplementals: The administrative supplemental
will provide funds to:
(1) One high school organization to produce and distribute the high
school scholarship promotional materials and maintain the CBYX High
School Scholarship application Web site, and
(2) One organization from either of the three components to
maintain the
[[Page 56820]]
Congress-Bundestag Alumni Database Web site for all CBYX participants.
High School Scholarship Materials and Web Site
In addition to the 20-page program narrative, interested high
school organizations may submit a bid to produce and distribute the
high school scholarship promotional materials and maintain the High
School scholarship application Web site. The narrative for the
supplemental should not exceed three pages and include a separate
budget projection. For budget/line-item details please see the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI). The supplemental funds
will be included in the final grant agreement and listed as a separate
item of expenditure. The Bureau anticipates funding this activity at a
level of approximately $53,200, pending availability of funds.
The selected high school ``administrative'' organization will
coordinate with all of the high school grantee organizations data/input
for production of the promotional materials. Once the input is
finalized the administrative organization will mass produce and
distribute the materials to the high school organizations. This
includes advertisement brochures, posters, and scholarship applications
for recruiting American high school students, and set up/maintenance of
the scholarship application Web site. The Web site advertises the same
printed promotional materials and allows interested students to
download applications and submit them to the respective high school
organization responsible for recruiting in the students' home state.
Once the high school grantee organizations receive the promotional
materials from the administrative organization they will distribute the
materials to a wide audience within their appointed region, including
public and private secondary schools, the media, and key networks such
as the American Association of Teachers of German. (Innovative methods
of publicizing the program are welcome, within funding limitations.
Organizations are encouraged to utilize their volunteer networks and
alumni to promote the program.)
Alumni Database Web Site
In addition to the 20-page program narrative, interested
organizations from either of the three components may submit a bid to
set up and maintain the CBYX Alumni Database Web site. The narrative
for the supplemental should not exceed three pages and include a
separate budget projection. For budget/line-item details please see the
Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI). The supplemental
funds will be included in the final grant agreement and listed as a
separate item of expenditure. The Bureau anticipates funding this
activity at a level of approximately $10,000, pending availability of
funds.
The organization selected to maintain the Congress-Bundestag Alumni
Database Web site for all CBYX participants will set up and maintain a
Web-based listing of CBYX participants designed to centrally harness
alumni and encourage activities beyond their participation in the
program. The organization select for this supplemental will coordinate
participant/alumni lists will all CBYX organizations to assure
students' eligibility and accuracy.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2009.
Approximate Total Funding: Unknown at this time, pending a FY-2009
Congressional Appropriation. However, for proposal development
purposes, the total FY-2007 funding level was $3,256,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 7 (5 High School Component, 1 Young
Professionals Component, 1 Vocational Component).
Approximate Average Award: Unknown at this time, pending a FY-2009
Congressional Appropriation.
Anticipated Award Date: January 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: August 2011.
Additional Information: Final funding will be pending a FY 2009
Congressional Appropriation. However, for illustrative purposes, the
current average per capita costs for each program component are: $4,545
for the high school component, $5,698 for the young professionals
component, and $3,900 for the vocational component. Applicants' budget
submissions should be realistic and reflect anticipated actual costs
required to implement the program(s) and the varying costs specific to
the German participants' hosting needs, and the American participants'
programming needs. Budget submissions under this RFGP may be subject to
renegotiation. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program
and the availability of funds.
Budgets should be prepared according to Tab D of the Proposal
Submission Instructions (PSI). You may delete or modify line items
according to program and administrative needs as described in the
proposal narrative. Please include budget notes, as appropriate.
High school organizations should prepare a budget to recruit/
program 50 Americans and host 57 Germans; vocational organizations
should prepare a budget to recruit/program 25 Americans; young
professionals organizations should prepare a budget to recruit/program
75 Americans and 75 Germans.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
[[Page 56821]]
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs
Division, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301
4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, (202) 203-7527 and (202) 203-
7529, jonessa1@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08 when making
your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer Shalita Jones and refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08 located at the top of
this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or
from the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J
visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations
receiving grants under this RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating
with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's
program.'' The actions of grantee program organizations shall be
``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with''
22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization
receiving a grant under this competition will render all assistance
necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62, et
seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places great
emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as
a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62, et seq.,
including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at #https://
exchanges.state.gov or from:
United States Department of State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD-SA-44, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029, FAX: (202) 453-8640.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
'Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The
[[Page 56822]]
Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the grantee will track participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the
program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a
result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The
evaluation plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable timeframe), the easier it will be to conduct the
evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to
the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives
clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3)
identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and (4)
provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for
each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please
note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of
outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their
regular program reports. All data collected, including survey responses
and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget projection
for the entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as
breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Please refer to the Solicitation Package for allowable
costs, complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.
Note: Final budgets will be solicited from the selected
grantees for FY 2009 (academic year 2009-10) no later than fall
2009.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: November 8, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and 8 copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on a PC-formatted
disk. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. Embassy for its
review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
[[Page 56823]]
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726, Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for grants
resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the Program Idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Program Planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda
and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described
above.
3. Ability To Achieve Program Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
4. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
5. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
6. Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or
project's goals.
7. Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
8. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
9. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
10. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead and administrative components
of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as
low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate.
11. Cost-sharing: Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through
other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
12. Value to U.S.-Partner Country Relations: Proposed projects
should receive positive assessments by the U.S. Department of State's
geographic area desk and overseas officers of program need, potential
impact, and significance in the partner country(ies).
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
[[Page 56824]]
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm #articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provided ECA with a hard copy original plus one of the
following reports:
Mandatory:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial reports which should include a
narrative of program activities and financial expenditures according to
the proposed time line within the specified quarter, as well as issues
that may have arisen and how they were handled, lessons learned, etc.,
(see POGI for more details).
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document. Reports may also
be sent electronically to reports@state.gov and copied the program
officer.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact Shalita Jones,
Program Officer, Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568,
ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20547, telephone (202) 203-7507 and fax number
(202) 203-7529, jonessa1@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/PY-08-08.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-19642 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P