The Dairy Import Licensing Program, 56677-56678 [07-4780]
Download as PDF
56677
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 192
Thursday, October 4, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 6
RIN 0551–AA70
The Dairy Import Licensing Program
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Office of the Secretary, USDA.
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
suspend the historical license reduction
provisions of the dairy import licensing
program, 7 CFR part 6, for a period of
5 years. This temporary suspension is
intended to improve program
administration and reflect changes in
the markets for cheese and other dairy
products subject to import licensing
requirements.
Submit comments on or before
November 5, 2007.
DATES:
Address all comments
concerning this proposed rule to Ron
Lord, Branch Chief, Sugar and Dairy
Branch, Import and Trade Support
Programs Division, Foreign Agricultural
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, Room
5531–S, STOP 1021, e-mail at
Ronald.Lord@usda.gov, telephone (202)
720–2916, or fax at (202) 720–0876.
Persons with disabilities who require an
alternative means for communication of
information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s
Target Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice
and TDD).
ADDRESSES:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Ron Lord, Branch Chief, Sugar
and Dairy Branch, Import and Trade
Support Programs Division, Foreign
Agricultural Service, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, Room 5531–S,
STOP 1021, e-mail at
Ronald.Lord@usda.gov, telephone (202)
720–2916, or fax at (202) 720–0876.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
Executive Order 12866
The proposed rule has been
determined to be non-significant under
E.O. 12866 and has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
ensures that regulatory and information
requirements are tailored to the size and
nature of small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on small businesses participating in the
program.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988. The
provisions of this proposed rule would
not have preemptive effect with respect
to any State or local laws, regulations,
or policies which conflict with such
provision or which otherwise impede
their full implementation. The proposed
rule would not have a retroactive effect.
Before any judicial action may be
brought forward regarding this proposed
rule, all administrative remedies must
be exhausted.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Administrator has determined
that this action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Therefore, neither
an Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
necessary for this proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub.
L. 104–4)
Public Law 104–4 requires
consultation with State and local
officials and Indian tribal governments.
This proposed rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate or any other
requirement on State, local, or tribal
governments. Accordingly, these
programs are not subject to the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act.
Executive Order 12630
This Order requires careful evaluation
of governmental actions that interfere
with constitutionally protected property
rights. This proposed rule would not
interfere with any property rights and,
therefore, does not need to be evaluated
on the basis of the criteria outlined in
Executive Order 12630.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act
FAS is committed to compliance with
the Government Paperwork Elimination
Act, which requires Government
agencies, in general, to provide the
public the option of submitting
information or transacting business
electronically to the maximum extent
possible.
Background
The proposed rule at 7 CFR part 6
would revise the Dairy Tariff-Rate
Import Quota Licensing regulation in
effect since October 9, 1996, by
suspending the provisions with respect
to the reduction of historical licenses
based on surrenders of unused amounts.
Import licensing is one of the tools the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
uses to administer the tariff-rate quota
(TRA) system for U.S. imports of dairy
products. TRQs replaced strictly
quantitative import quotas for dairy
products on January 1, 1995, as a result
of the Uruguay Round Agreement on
Agriculture and the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act.
Under these TRQs, a low tariff rate,
called the in-quota rate, applies to
imports up to a specified quantity. A
higher tariff rate called the over-quota
rate, applies to any imports in excess of
that amount. TRQ rates and quantities
vary by product.
For dairy products subject to TRQs, a
license issued by the Foreign
Agricultural Service (FAS) is generally
required to import products at the inquota rate. No license is required to
import products at the over-quota rate.
Under the historical license
reductions provisions, the amount of the
license issued by FAS is reduced if the
importer surrenders more than 50
percent of the license during either
three consecutive years or at least three
out of five consecutive years.
Specifically, section 6.25(b)(1)(i)
provides that beginning with the 1999
quota year, if a licensee has surrendered
more than 50 percent of a historical
license in each of the three prior years,
that license will be permanently
reduced to the average amount entered
during those three years. Section
6.25(b)(1)(ii) provides that beginning
with the quota year 2001, if a licensee
surrenders more than 50 percent of a
historical license in at least three out of
the five prior years, that license will be
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
56678
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
permanently reduced to the average
amount entered during those five years.
These provisions are intended to
provide a strong incentive for
companies with historical licenses to
utilize their licenses.
The current regulation permitted the
Secretary of Agriculture to suspend the
historical license reduction provisions
applicable prior to 1999. In 1998, the
Secretary published a notice in the
Federal Register suspending these
provisions for five years, thereby
delaying their implementation until
2004. The provisions were suspended in
order to ‘‘provide adequate time for
historical licensees of European Union
(EU) cheeses to adjust to changing
market conditions; to find alternative
suppliers of cheese in the EU; and to
develop new markets to enable
importers to fully utilize their historical
licenses for EU cheese.’’ FAS also noted:
‘‘The suspension is consistent with the
intent of the U.S.-EU Uruguay Round
bilateral agreement on maximizing
utilization of U.S. licenses for EU
cheese.’’
However, current market conditions
have again prompted the need for a
temporary suspension of the historical
license reduction provisions. The
production of certain cheeses in the EU,
particularly Swiss cheese, has declined
primarily due to a reduction in
subsidies. Other cheeses, particularly
processed Gruyere cheese, have
declined in production primarily due to
a change in consumer preferences and
market demand. And finally, production
of industrial grade low-fat cheeses has
declined precipitously due to a switch
to more profitable, consumer-oriented
cheeses. Additionally, the expansion of
the EU from 15 to 27 countries has
diminished the availability of milk for
cheese production and reduced
availability of cheese for export.
This temporary suspension is
intended to improve program
administration and reflect changes in
the markets for cheese and other dairy
products subject to import licensing
requirements. The historical licenses
provide for orderly importation of a
wide variety of cheeses and permit
companies to invest in market
development with some assurance of
future ability to provide specific types
of cheese.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 6
Agricultural commodities, Cheese,
Dairy products, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons described in the
preamble, the Department of Agriculture
proposes to amend 7 CFR part 6 as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
PART 6—IMPORT QUOTAS AND FEES
1. The authority citation for part 6
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 8, 65 Stat. 75; 19 U.S.C.
1365.
2. Section 6.25 is amended by revising
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) to read as
follows:
§ 6.25
Allocation of Licenses
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Beginning with the 2012 quota
year, a person who has surrendered
more than 50 percent of such historical
license in each of the prior three quota
years will thereafter be issued a license
in an amount equal to the average
annual quantity entered during those
three quota years; and
(ii) Beginning with the 2014 quota
year, a person who has surrendered
more than 50 percent of such historical
license in at least three of the prior five
quota years will thereafter be issued a
license in an amount equal to the
average annual quantity entered during
those five quota years.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 14, 2007.
Michael W. Yost,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 07–4780 Filed 10–1–07; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 962
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0090; FV07–962–
1 AN]
Handling Regulations for Leafy Greens
Under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is issuing this advance
notice of proposed rulemaking in
response to industry interest in the
establishment of a marketing program to
address the handling of fresh and freshcut leafy green vegetables. The program
would allow packers, processors,
shippers, and marketers (collectively
referred to as handlers) to maintain the
quality of their products by reducing the
risk of pathogenic contamination during
the production and handling of leafy
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
greens. Authorities and regulations
under the program would not supplant
those of the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), which is
responsible for ensuring that foods are
safe, wholesome, and sanitary.
Comments are being sought from the
public, particularly from growers,
handlers, buyers, and sellers of leafy
green commodities, regarding whether
to issue such regulations under an AMS
marketing program and if so, the
possible substance and implementation
of the program.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 3, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning the issues contained in this
notice. Comments must be sent to the
Docket Clerk, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938 or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the docket number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel May or Kathleen Finn, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail:
laurel.may@usda.gov or
kathy.finn@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
invites comments on a potential
regulatory program intended to
maintain the quality of leafy green
commodities by reducing the risk of
pathogenic contamination during their
production and handling. AMS is
considering implementation of a
marketing agreement (agreement) in
response to heightened public and
industry concern about the safe
production and handling of leafy greens.
Under the program being considered,
handlers could voluntarily enter into
the agreement, but signatories would
then be required to comply with the
agreement’s regulations, which would
specify Best Practices for minimizing
the risk of pathogenic contamination of
leafy greens. The Best Practices could
include commodity-specific production
and handling guidelines that would be
developed in cooperation with the
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56677-56678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4780]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 56677]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 6
RIN 0551-AA70
The Dairy Import Licensing Program
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would suspend the historical license
reduction provisions of the dairy import licensing program, 7 CFR part
6, for a period of 5 years. This temporary suspension is intended to
improve program administration and reflect changes in the markets for
cheese and other dairy products subject to import licensing
requirements.
DATES: Submit comments on or before November 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this proposed rule to Ron
Lord, Branch Chief, Sugar and Dairy Branch, Import and Trade Support
Programs Division, Foreign Agricultural Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, Room 5531-S, STOP 1021, e-mail at
Ronald.Lord@usda.gov, telephone (202) 720-2916, or fax at (202) 720-
0876. Persons with disabilities who require an alternative means for
communication of information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)
should contact USDA's Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Ron Lord, Branch Chief, Sugar
and Dairy Branch, Import and Trade Support Programs Division, Foreign
Agricultural Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20250, Room 5531-S, STOP 1021, e-mail at Ronald.Lord@usda.gov,
telephone (202) 720-2916, or fax at (202) 720-0876.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The proposed rule has been determined to be non-significant under
E.O. 12866 and has been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act ensures that regulatory and
information requirements are tailored to the size and nature of small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on small
businesses participating in the program.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988.
The provisions of this proposed rule would not have preemptive effect
with respect to any State or local laws, regulations, or policies which
conflict with such provision or which otherwise impede their full
implementation. The proposed rule would not have a retroactive effect.
Before any judicial action may be brought forward regarding this
proposed rule, all administrative remedies must be exhausted.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Administrator has determined that this action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is necessary for this proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-4)
Public Law 104-4 requires consultation with State and local
officials and Indian tribal governments. This proposed rule does not
impose an unfunded mandate or any other requirement on State, local, or
tribal governments. Accordingly, these programs are not subject to the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Executive Order 12630
This Order requires careful evaluation of governmental actions that
interfere with constitutionally protected property rights. This
proposed rule would not interfere with any property rights and,
therefore, does not need to be evaluated on the basis of the criteria
outlined in Executive Order 12630.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
FAS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires Government agencies, in general, to
provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
Background
The proposed rule at 7 CFR part 6 would revise the Dairy Tariff-
Rate Import Quota Licensing regulation in effect since October 9, 1996,
by suspending the provisions with respect to the reduction of
historical licenses based on surrenders of unused amounts.
Import licensing is one of the tools the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) uses to administer the tariff-rate quota (TRA)
system for U.S. imports of dairy products. TRQs replaced strictly
quantitative import quotas for dairy products on January 1, 1995, as a
result of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture and the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act.
Under these TRQs, a low tariff rate, called the in-quota rate,
applies to imports up to a specified quantity. A higher tariff rate
called the over-quota rate, applies to any imports in excess of that
amount. TRQ rates and quantities vary by product.
For dairy products subject to TRQs, a license issued by the Foreign
Agricultural Service (FAS) is generally required to import products at
the in-quota rate. No license is required to import products at the
over-quota rate.
Under the historical license reductions provisions, the amount of
the license issued by FAS is reduced if the importer surrenders more
than 50 percent of the license during either three consecutive years or
at least three out of five consecutive years. Specifically, section
6.25(b)(1)(i) provides that beginning with the 1999 quota year, if a
licensee has surrendered more than 50 percent of a historical license
in each of the three prior years, that license will be permanently
reduced to the average amount entered during those three years. Section
6.25(b)(1)(ii) provides that beginning with the quota year 2001, if a
licensee surrenders more than 50 percent of a historical license in at
least three out of the five prior years, that license will be
[[Page 56678]]
permanently reduced to the average amount entered during those five
years. These provisions are intended to provide a strong incentive for
companies with historical licenses to utilize their licenses.
The current regulation permitted the Secretary of Agriculture to
suspend the historical license reduction provisions applicable prior to
1999. In 1998, the Secretary published a notice in the Federal Register
suspending these provisions for five years, thereby delaying their
implementation until 2004. The provisions were suspended in order to
``provide adequate time for historical licensees of European Union (EU)
cheeses to adjust to changing market conditions; to find alternative
suppliers of cheese in the EU; and to develop new markets to enable
importers to fully utilize their historical licenses for EU cheese.''
FAS also noted: ``The suspension is consistent with the intent of the
U.S.-EU Uruguay Round bilateral agreement on maximizing utilization of
U.S. licenses for EU cheese.''
However, current market conditions have again prompted the need for
a temporary suspension of the historical license reduction provisions.
The production of certain cheeses in the EU, particularly Swiss cheese,
has declined primarily due to a reduction in subsidies. Other cheeses,
particularly processed Gruyere cheese, have declined in production
primarily due to a change in consumer preferences and market demand.
And finally, production of industrial grade low-fat cheeses has
declined precipitously due to a switch to more profitable, consumer-
oriented cheeses. Additionally, the expansion of the EU from 15 to 27
countries has diminished the availability of milk for cheese production
and reduced availability of cheese for export.
This temporary suspension is intended to improve program
administration and reflect changes in the markets for cheese and other
dairy products subject to import licensing requirements. The historical
licenses provide for orderly importation of a wide variety of cheeses
and permit companies to invest in market development with some
assurance of future ability to provide specific types of cheese.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 6
Agricultural commodities, Cheese, Dairy products, Imports,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons described in the preamble, the Department of
Agriculture proposes to amend 7 CFR part 6 as follows:
PART 6--IMPORT QUOTAS AND FEES
1. The authority citation for part 6 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 8, 65 Stat. 75; 19 U.S.C. 1365.
2. Section 6.25 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and
(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 6.25 Allocation of Licenses
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Beginning with the 2012 quota year, a person who has
surrendered more than 50 percent of such historical license in each of
the prior three quota years will thereafter be issued a license in an
amount equal to the average annual quantity entered during those three
quota years; and
(ii) Beginning with the 2014 quota year, a person who has
surrendered more than 50 percent of such historical license in at least
three of the prior five quota years will thereafter be issued a license
in an amount equal to the average annual quantity entered during those
five quota years.
* * * * *
Dated: September 14, 2007.
Michael W. Yost,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 07-4780 Filed 10-1-07; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-M