Performance Review Board and Membership, 55833-55834 [07-4802]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, TX 77058–3696 Location 6 John F. Kennedy Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899–0001 Location 7 Langley Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hampton, VA 23681–2199 Location 8 John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135–3191 Location 9 George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812–0001 Location 10 HQ NASA Management Office-JPL, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109–8099 Location 11 John C. Stennis Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529–6000 Location 12 JSC White Sands Test Facility, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, P.O. Drawer MM, Las Cruces, NM 88004–0020 Location 13 GRC Plum Brook Station, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Sandusky, OH 44870 Location 14 MSFC Michoud Assembly Facility, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, P.O. Box 29300, New Orleans, LA 70189 Location 15 NASA Independent Verification and Validation Facility (NASA IV&V), 100 University Drive, Fairmont, WV 26554 Location 16 Edison Post of Duty, c/o DCIS, P.O. 1054, Edison, NJ 08818 Location 17 Western Field Office, Glenn Anderson Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90802–4222 Location 18 NASA Shared Services Center (NSSC), Building 5100, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529–6000 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Appendix B—Standard Routine Uses— NASA The following routine uses of information contained in SORs, subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, are standard for many NASA systems. They are cited by reference in the paragraph ‘‘Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such uses’’ of the Federal Register Notice on those systems to which they apply. Standard Routine Use No. 1—LAW ENFORCEMENT—In the event this system of records indicates a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, and whether arising by VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:31 Sep 28, 2007 Jkt 214001 general statute or particular program statute, or by regulation, rule or order issued pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the SOR may be referred, as a routine use, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, local or foreign, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation or order issued pursuant thereto. Standard Routine Use No. 2— DISCLOSURE OF REQUESTED INFORMATION—A record from this SOR may be disclosed as a ‘‘routine use’’ to a Federal, State, or local agency maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent information, such as current licenses, if necessary to obtain information relevant to an agency decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit. Standard Routine Use No. 3— DISCLOSURE OF REQUESTED INFORMATION—A record from this SOR may be disclosed to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency’s decision on the matter. Standard Routine Use No. 4— DISCLOSURE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR USE IN LITIGATION: It shall be a routine use of the records in this system of records to disclose them to the Department of Justice when (a) The Agency, or any component thereof; or (b) any employee of the Agency in his or her official capacity; or (c) any employee of the Agency in his or her individual capacity where the Department of Justice or the Agency has agreed to represent the employee; or (d) the United States, where the Agency determines that litigation is likely to affect the Agency or any of its components, is a party to litigation or has an interest in such litigation, and the use of such records by the Department of Justice or the Agency is deemed by the Agency to be relevant and necessary to the litigation provided, however, that in each case it has been determined that the disclosure is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected. Standard Routine Use No. 5—ROUTINE USE FOR AGENCY DISCLOSURE IN LITIGATION—It shall be a routine use of the records in this system of records to disclose them in a proceeding before a court or adjudicative body before which the agency is authorized to appear, when: (a) The Agency, or any component thereof; or (b) any employee of the Agency in his or her official capacity; or (c) any employee of the Agency in his or her individual capacity where the Agency has agreed to represent the employee; or (d) the United States, where the Agency determines that litigation is likely to affect the Agency or any of its components, is a party to litigation or has an interest in such litigation, and the use of such records by the PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55833 Agency is deemed to be relevant and necessary to the litigation, provided, however, that in each case, the Agency has determined that the disclosure is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected. Standard Routine Use No. 6—SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED CONFIDENTIALITY COMPROMISE—A record from this SOR may be disclosed to appropriate agencies, entities, and persons when (1) NASA suspects or has confirmed that the security or confidentiality of information in the system of records has been compromised; (2) NASA has determined that as a result of the suspected or confirmed compromise there is a risk of harm to economic or property interests, identity theft or fraud, or harm to the security or integrity of this system or other systems or programs (whether maintained by NASA or another agency or entity) that rely upon the compromised information; and (3) the disclosure made to such agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist in connection with NASA’s efforts to respond to the suspected or confirmed compromise and prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm. [FR Doc. E7–19278 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7510–13–P OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION Performance Review Board and Membership Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointments of members to a performance review board for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. McAlister, Deputy Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 201 E. Birch Ave., Room 11, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, Telephone (928) 779–2721. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations, one or more Senior Executive Service (SES) performance review boards. The function of the boards is to review and evaluate the initial appraisal of senior executives’ performance and make recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of these executives. Because of its small size, the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation has appointed SES appointees from other Federal agencies to serve on its performance review board. The members of the performance review board for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation are: E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 55834 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices Ronald Linz, Deputy Director, International Broadcasting Bureau. John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission. Ernest Garcia, Deputy Director, Selective Service System. Dated: September 24, 2007. Michael J. McAlister, Deputy Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation. [FR Doc. 07–4802 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7560–01–M NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Opportunity for Hearing Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64 for an Additional 20-Year Period: Extension of Time for Filing of Requests for Hearing or Petitions for Leave To Intervene in the License Renewal Proceeding U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: License renewal: Extension of time for the filing of requests for hearing or petitions for leave to intervene in the license renewal proceeding. AGENCY: mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES SUMMARY: On August 1, 2007 (72 FR 42134), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) announced its acceptance for docketing of the application and notice of opportunity for hearing for the renewal of Operating License Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64, which authorize Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to operate Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, respectively, at 3216 megawatts thermal (MWt) for each unit. A sixty-day period was provided for the filing of written requests for a hearing or petitions for leave to intervene with respect to the renewal of the license. The period for the filing of requests for a hearing or petitions for leave to intervene was to have expired on October 1, 2007. The period for the filing of requests for a hearing or petitions for leave to intervene has been extended and now expires on November 30, 2007. The period for filling answers to such requests or petitions has also been extended. The period for the filing of requests for a hearing or petitions for leave to intervene has been extended and now expires on November 30, 2007. Answers to such requests or petitions are now due on January 11, 2008, and replies to those answers are due on DATES: VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:31 Sep 28, 2007 Jkt 214001 January 18, 2008 (see 10 CFR 2.309(h)). Non-timely requests and/or petitions and contentions will not be entertained absent a determination of the Commission, the presiding officer, or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition, request and/or contentions should be granted based on a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.309(a)(1)(i)–(viii). ADDRESSES: A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; (2) Courier, express mail, and expedited delivery services to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; (3) E-mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV; or (4) facsimile transmission addressed to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff at 301–415–1101 (verification number: 301–415–1966).1 A copy of the request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene must also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, and it is requested that copies be transmitted either by means of facsimile transmission to 301–415–3725 or by email to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy of the request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene should also be sent to the Assistant General Counsel, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 440 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601. Detailed information about the license renewal process can be found under the Nuclear Reactors icon at http:// www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ licensing/renewal.html on the NRC’s Web site. Copies of the application to renew the operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 are available for public inspection at the Commission’s Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852–2738. The same documents may also be viewed and downloaded electronically via the 1 If the request/petition is filed by e-mail or facsimile, an original and two copies of the document must be mailed within 2 (two) business days thereafter to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 applications Web site, http:// www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ licensing/renewal/applications.html, while the application is under review. The application may be accessed in ADAMS through the NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html under ADAMS Accession Numbers ML071210507, ML071280700, and ML071800318. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS may contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. The NRC staff has verified that a copy of the license renewal application is also available to local residents near Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 at the White Plains Public Library, 100 Martine Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601; the Field Library, 4 Nelson Avenue, Peekskill, NY 10566; and the Hendrick Hudson Free Library, 185 Kings Ferry Road, Montrose, NY 10548. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of September 2007. For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–19311 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 40–8838–MLA; ASLBP No. 00– 776–04–MLA] Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; in the Matter of: U.S. Army (Jefferson Proving Ground Site); Notice of Hearing (Application for a License Amendment) September 20, 2007. Before Administrative Judges: Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman; Dr. Paul B. Abramson, Dr. Richard F. Cole. This Atomic Safety and Licensing Board hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart L, it will convene an evidentiary hearing on October 22, 2007 to receive testimony and exhibits concerning the adequacy of the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) in the application submitted by the Department of the Army (Licensee) for an amendment to its NRC materials license (License No. SUB–1435) for an alternate decommissioning schedule. See 10 CFR 40.42(g)(2). Between 1983 and 1994, under the auspices of that license, the Licensee E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 189 (Monday, October 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55833-55834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4802]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION


Performance Review Board and Membership

AGENCY:  Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointments of members to a 
performance review board for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian 
Relocation.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Michael J. McAlister, Deputy 
Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 201 E. Birch 
Ave., Room 11, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, Telephone (928) 779-2721.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., 
requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations, one 
or more Senior Executive Service (SES) performance review boards. The 
function of the boards is to review and evaluate the initial appraisal 
of senior executives' performance and make recommendations to the 
appointing authority relative to the performance of these executives. 
Because of its small size, the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian 
Relocation has appointed SES appointees from other Federal agencies to 
serve on its performance review board. The members of the performance 
review board for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation are:


[[Page 55834]]


Ronald Linz, Deputy Director, International Broadcasting Bureau.
John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission.
Ernest Garcia, Deputy Director, Selective Service System.


    Dated: September 24, 2007.
Michael J. McAlister,
Deputy Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.
[FR Doc. 07-4802 Filed 9-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7560-01-M