Notice of Availability of Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, AK, 55244-55246 [E7-19064]
Download as PDF
55244
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 188 / Friday, September 28, 2007 / Notices
date of this Article, be assigned a
taxpayer identification number by the
Department pursuant to Title 20,
Section 20–1417.
Section 2–612. Filing of Return.
All retailers shall pay to the
Department of Revenue and Finance all
taxes under this Chapter. Each retailer
that sells liquor and/or packaged liquor
at retail within the boundaries of the
Reservation shall file monthly tax
returns showing tax receipts received
during each monthly period on forms
prescribed by the Department. The tax
return shall be filed before the last day
of the calendar month next succeeding
the month for which the tax return is
made and shall be accompanied by
payment of all taxes due and owing for
the month covered by said tax return.
Section 2–613. Records.
All retailers shall maintain and
preserve complete and accurate books,
records and accounts showing the gross
receipts for sales of liquor and/or
packaged liquor at retail and the taxes
collected each day and shall make
available such books, records and
accounts to the Director of the
Department of Revenue and Finance for
examination for those periods of time
prescribed in Article I, Chapter 8 of the
Taxation Code.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Section 2–614. Failure to Pay Tax.
Taxes that are not remitted to the
Department of Revenue and Finance on
or before the due date are delinquent.
Section 2–615. Violations; Additional
Penalties.
Any retailer which violates, disobeys,
omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with, or resists or opposes the
enforcement of any of the provisions of
this Chapter, may be assessed a penalty
of not less than Seventy-Five Dollars
($75.00) nor more than Five Thousand
Dollars ($5,000.00) for the first
violation, and not less than One
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00), nor
more than Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000.00) for the second violation, and
not less than Three Hundred Dollars
($300.00) nor more than Five Thousand
($5,000.00) for the third violation, and
not less than One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) nor more than Ten
Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for the
fourth and each subsequent violation, or
five (5) times the amount of the tax
imposed, if any, whichever is higher, for
the second and each subsequent
violation. A separate and distinct
violation shall be regarded as committed
each day said retailer continues any
such violation, or permits any such
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
violation to exist after notification
thereof. The penalties imposed under
this Chapter shall be in addition to the
tax and in addition to those penalties,
if any, imposed under Article I, Chapter
7 of the Taxation Code.
Section 2–616. Promulgation of
Regulations.
The Director shall have the power to
promulgate regulations for the
enforcement of the provisions of this
Chapter and the collection of revenues
hereunder.
Section 2–617. Amendments.
The provisions of this Chapter may be
amended at the discretion of the Tribal
Council by Ordinance or Resolution.
Section 2–618. Failure to Remit;
Licensing.
Collection and payment of this tax
may be enforced by action in any court
of competent jurisdiction and failure to
account for or pay the tax by retailers of
taxable alcoholic liquor shall be cause
for revocation of any license of such
retailer or applicable to the premises
thereof, in addition to any other penalty
provided in this Article.
Section 2–619. Application to the
Tribes.
The provisions of this Chapter shall
apply to the Tribes including any
governmental entity or enterprise of the
Tribes. For purposes of this Chapter, the
Tribes, including any governmental
entity or enterprise of the Tribes, if
applicable, shall be considered a
‘‘retailer.’’
Section 2–620. Nondiscrimination.
No provision of this Chapter shall be
construed as imposing a tax that
discriminates on the basis of whether a
bar, restaurant, packaged liquor store or
similar establishment is owned,
managed or operated by a member of the
Tribes.
[FR Doc. E7–19150 Filed 9–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK–025–07–1610–DQ–089L]
Notice of Availability of Kobuk-Seward
Peninsula Proposed Resource
Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement, AK
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed Resource Management Plan/
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(Proposed RMP/Final EIS) for the
Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Planning Area
in Alaska.
DATES: The BLM Planning Regulations
state that any person who participated
in the planning process, and has an
interest that is or may be adversely
affected, may protest the BLM’s
approval or amendment of an RMP
within 30 days of the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register. Instructions for
filing of protests are described in the
Dear Reader letter of the Kobuk-Seward
Peninsula Proposed RMP/Final EIS.
Please consult BLM’s Planning
Regulations (43 CFR 1610.5–2) for
further instructions on protests.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanie Cole, BLM Central Yukon Field
Office, 1150 University Avenue,
Fairbanks, AK 99709, (907) 474–2340,
jeanie_cole@ak.blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Kobuk-Seward Peninsula planning area
covers approximately 11.9 million acres
of BLM-managed land in northwestern
Alaska. The Kobuk-Seward Peninsula
Proposed RMP/Final EIS focuses on the
principles of multiple use and sustained
yield as prescribed by section 202 of the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (FLPMA). The Proposed
RMP/Final EIS considers and analyzes
four alternatives, including a No Action
and a Preferred Alternative. The
alternatives provide for an array of
variable levels of commodity production
and resource protection and restoration.
The Proposed RMP/Final EIS will help
the BLM meet its mandate of multiple
use and sustained yield.
The alternatives were developed
based on public scoping and
participation, and the requirements of
the BLM’s Land Use Planning Handbook
(H–1601–1). The public involvement
and collaboration process included 9
public scoping meetings, 12 public
meetings on the Draft RMP/EIS, and
meetings with other interested parties.
Four primary issues were raised and
addressed through this planning
process. (1) Recreation, including how
the BLM should manage recreation to
provide and maintain a diversity of
experiences on BLM-managed public
lands while protecting subsistence
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 188 / Friday, September 28, 2007 / Notices
resources and opportunity, and what
level of commercial recreational permits
is appropriate, particularly in the
Squirrel River area; (2) Subsistence,
including maintaining and protecting
subsistence uses; (3) Minerals
Management, determining which areas
should be available for mineral
exploration and development; (4)
Access/Travel Management, allowing
for access to BLM-managed public lands
for various purposes. In addition to
these issues, the Proposed RMP/Final
EIS addresses management of various
program areas such as vegetation, fish
and wildlife habitat, fire management,
cultural resources, visual resources,
forest products, livestock grazing, and
realty. The Proposed RMP/Final EIS
also resulted in development of required
operating procedures (ROP), which are
requirements, procedures, management
practices, or design features the BLM
adopts as operational requirements for
all permitted activities. The ROPs were
developed to ensure that Alaska
Statewide Land Health Standards are
met.
The Squirrel River area contains BLMand-State-managed land, and is
surrounded by National Park Serviceand Fish and Wildlife Service-managed
lands. Ultimately, the Northwest Arctic
Borough will also be a land owner.
Approximately 14 percent of the public
comments were related to recreation
and 7 percent were specific to the
Squirrel River. Relatively easy access to
this area from Kotzebue by fixed-wing
aircraft, a large number of gravel bars
that can be used for landing strips, and
the reduced level of regulation
compared to other surrounding federal
lands, make the Squirrel River a popular
destination for hunters. Local
subsistence hunters have expressed
concern about this area for more than a
decade, raising issues such as
competition with subsistence hunters by
large numbers of sport hunters,
potential deflection of migrating caribou
away from subsistence villages, waste of
game meat, lack of enforcement, and
unmanaged commercial guiding/
transporter operations. Alternatives B,
C, and D of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS
all identify the Squirrel River as a
special recreation management area.
One component of the BLM’s preferred
55245
alternative (D) is to maintain
recreational use of the Squirrel River at
the current level while developing a
recreation area management plan. This
recreation area management plan,
developed in concert with the State and
Northwest Arctic Borough, both of
which do or soon will own land in the
Squirrel River watershed, would
develop special rules to address the
issues in the area.
As required by 43 CFR 1610.7–2,
areas with potential for designation as
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC) have been considered during the
planning process. Approximately seven
percent of the total comments submitted
during the public-comment period
pertained to ACECs. The Proposed
RMP/Final EIS identifies six ACECs for
designation in the BLM’s preferred
alternative. Final acreage for areas
designated as ACECs will depend on the
result of land conveyance to the State of
Alaska and Native Corporations. The
following table provides a summary of
proposed ACECs and descriptions of
resource use limitations provided by
decisions made in the proposed plan.
TABLE 1.—PROPOSED ACECS UNDER ALTERNATIVE D (PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE) OF THE PROPOSED RMP/FINAL EIS
Acreage
Resource use limitations
Nulato Hills ACEC .....................
1.1 million ....
Western Arctic Caribou Herd
Insect Relief ACEC.
Inglutalik Watershed ACEC .......
Ungalik Watershed ACEC .........
Shaktoolik Watershed ACEC .....
Mount Osborn ACEC .................
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Name of area
1.5 million ....
Limited OHV designation.
Retained in Federal ownership.
Closed to grazing outside of existing allotments.
Designate as ROW avoidance area.
Open to fluid mineral leasing subject to special stipulations.
Open to locatable mineral entry subject to required operating procedures.
Same as Nulato Hills except it would not be designated as a ROW avoidance area and the
entire ACEC would be closed to grazing.
Same as Nulato Hills except it would not be a ROW avoidance area.
Same as Nulato Hills except it would not be a ROW avoidance area.
Same as Nulato Hills except it would not be a ROW avoidance area.
Same as Nulato Hills except the level of commercial recreational use may be limited, it would
be open to grazing, and it would not be a ROW avoidance area.
466,000 .......
264,000 .......
234,000 .......
82,000 .........
During the public comment period on
the Draft RMP/EIS the BLM received
nine additional ACEC nominations. The
areas nominated were: Coastal areas
near Kivalina, Teller, Koyuk, and
Unalakleet; the Bendeleben and Darby
mountains; the Agiapuk and American
rivers; and the multiple major pathways
and convergence area of caribou
migration routes in the vicinity of
Selawik-Kobuk. The BLM evaluated
these areas for possible ACEC
designation and determined that
designation was not warranted. The
BLM will not retain sufficient land in
the Teller, Kivalina and Koyuk areas to
warrant designation, Unalakleet is
outside of the Planning Area, and the
BLM does not administer any land along
the American River. The Bendeleben
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
and Darby mountains and the Agiapuk
River have some relevant values but do
not meet the importance criteria defined
under 43 CFR 1601.7–2. The caribou
migration routes meet the relevance
criteria of supporting a significant
wildlife resource. However, data on
caribou migration routes is not
sufficient to support the importance
criteria. In fact, the limited data
available seems to indicate that caribou
migrate less on BLM-managed public
land and more on private, National Park
Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and
State lands. The primary areas of BLMmanaged public land in this migration
area are the Squirrel River, which was
identified as a special recreation
management area where BLM proposes
to develop a recreation area
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
management plan, and the northern
Nulato Hills, which is within the
proposed Nulato Hills ACEC.
All comments received on the plan
were analyzed and evaluated. Appendix
J of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS
contains all substantive comments
received and BLM responses to those
comments. Comments on the Draft
RMP/EIS received from the public and
internal BLM review comments were
incorporated into the Proposed RMP/
Final EIS. Public comments resulted in
changes to the preferred alternative
through the addition of clarifying text
and additional analysis of impacts. A
summary of these changes is included
in the Proposed RMP/Final EIS after the
Executive Summary.
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55246
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 188 / Friday, September 28, 2007 / Notices
Copies of the Kobuk-Seward
Peninsula Proposed RMP/Final EIS have
been sent to affected Federal, State, and
Local Government agencies and to
interested parties. Copies of the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS have also been
sent to individuals, agencies, and
groups as requested or as required by
regulation or policy. Copies of the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS are available
for public inspection at the BLM
Fairbanks District Office at 1150
University Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska,
during normal business hours from 7:45
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday except holidays.
Interested persons may also view the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS on the Internet
at https://www.ak.blm.gov/ksp or at one
of the following locations in Alaska: The
BLM Fairbanks District Office,
Fairbanks; BLM Nome Field Station,
Nome; BLM Anchorage Field Office,
Anchorage; BLM Alaska State Office,
Public Room, Anchorage; Noel Wien
Library, Fairbanks; Keyoayah Kozga
Library, Nome; Chukchi Consortium
Library, Kotzebue; Anchorage
Municipal Library, Anchorage; Alaska
State Library, Juneau; Tuzzy Consortium
Library, Barrow; Selawik National
Wildlife Refuge Headquarters, Kotzebue;
Northwest Arctic Borough Planning
Department, Kotzebue.
E-mail and faxed protests will not be
accepted as valid protests unless the
protesting party also provides the
original letter by either regular or
overnight mail postmarked by the close
of the protest period to one of the
following addresses, or as appropriate:
Regular Mail: Director (210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box
66538, Washington, DC 20035.
Overnight Mail: Director (210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L
Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington,
DC 20036.
Under these conditions, the BLM will
consider the e-mail or faxed protest as
an advance copy and it will receive full
consideration. If you wish to provide
the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests
to the attention of the BLM protest
coordinator at 202–452–5112, and emails to Brenda_HudgensWilliams@blm.gov.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
protest, you should be aware that your
entire protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your protest to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: August 20, 2007.
Julia Dougan,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. E7–19064 Filed 9–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Madera Irrigation District Water Supply
Enhancement Project
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
and notice of public scoping meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation)
proposes to prepare an EIS for the
proposed Madera Irrigation District
(MID) Water Supply Enhancement
Project (Project), in which MID would
construct a groundwater bank on the
property known as Madera Ranch, west
of the City of Madera, Madera County,
CA. The Federal actions include
approval from Reclamation for MID to
bank a portion of their Central Valley
Project (CVP) Friant Division contract
water supply outside of its service area
in the newly constructed groundwater
bank at Madera Ranch and approval to
extend the Reclamation-owned 24.2
Canal.
Reclamation will hold a scoping
meeting to seek public input on topics,
issues, and alternatives to be considered
in the EIS. The scoping meeting will
occur on October 22, 2007 at 6:30 p.m.
Written comments should be mailed
to Reclamation at the address below by
close of business November 5, 2007.
If special assistance is required at the
scoping meeting, please contact Ms.
Patti Clinton, Reclamation, at (559) 487–
5127, TDD (559) 487–5933, or via e-mail
at pclinton@mp.usbr.gov no less than
five working days prior to the meeting.
ADDRESSES: The scoping meeting will be
held at the Madera Irrigation District
Office, 2152 Road 28 1/4, Madera, CA
93637.
Written comments on the scope of the
environmental document should be sent
to Ms. Patti Clinton, Bureau of
Reclamation, 1243 N Street, Fresno, CA
93721, via e-mail at
pclinton@mp.usbr.gov, or fax to 559–
487–5397.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Patti Clinton, Reclamation, at the above
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
address, (559) 487–5127; or MID, 12152
Road 28 1/4, Madera, CA 93637–9199
(559) 268–2483, fax: (559) 673–0564.
In
accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
MID approved its Water Supply
Enhancement Project in September 2005
based on a Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)—State Clearing House
# 2005031068. At the time, there was no
Federal action. Reclamation commented
on the draft EIR stating that once MID
proposed a Federal action, Reclamation
would need to complete and satisfy all
NEPA and Endangered Species Act
requirements before approving any
Federal action. This EIS has been
initiated in response to MID’s request
that Reclamation approve the banking of
CVP water outside of its service area in
the proposed Madera Ranch water bank,
as well as alterations to Federal
facilities.
The primary objectives of the Project
are to:
• Enhance water supply reliability
and flexibility;
• Help maintain water costs at levels
that are affordable to farmers;
• Reduce aquifer overdraft;
• Improve groundwater quality; and
• Encourage conjunctive use, where
appropriate.
The Project includes facilities
necessary to store water in and recover
water from the underlying aquifer.
Phase 1 would be recharge-related
facilities only. Phase 2 would involve
supplemental recharge facilities and
facilities for recovery of stored water.
The water bank would have a total
storage capacity of 250,000 acre-feet
(AF), and could recharge or recover up
to 55,000 AF of water per year.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Disclosure
Before including your name, address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: August 22, 2007.
Susan M. Fry,
Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific
Region.
[FR Doc. E7–19249 Filed 9–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 188 (Friday, September 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55244-55246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-19064]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK-025-07-1610-DQ-089L]
Notice of Availability of Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Proposed
Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, AK
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Proposed Resource Management Plan/
Final Environmental Impact Statement (Proposed RMP/Final EIS) for the
Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Planning Area in Alaska.
DATES: The BLM Planning Regulations state that any person who
participated in the planning process, and has an interest that is or
may be adversely affected, may protest the BLM's approval or amendment
of an RMP within 30 days of the date that the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in the Federal Register.
Instructions for filing of protests are described in the Dear Reader
letter of the Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Proposed RMP/Final EIS. Please
consult BLM's Planning Regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-2) for further
instructions on protests.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanie Cole, BLM Central Yukon Field
Office, 1150 University Avenue, Fairbanks, AK 99709, (907) 474-2340,
jeanie_cole@ak.blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Kobuk-Seward Peninsula planning area
covers approximately 11.9 million acres of BLM-managed land in
northwestern Alaska. The Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Proposed RMP/Final EIS
focuses on the principles of multiple use and sustained yield as
prescribed by section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976 (FLPMA). The Proposed RMP/Final EIS considers and analyzes four
alternatives, including a No Action and a Preferred Alternative. The
alternatives provide for an array of variable levels of commodity
production and resource protection and restoration. The Proposed RMP/
Final EIS will help the BLM meet its mandate of multiple use and
sustained yield.
The alternatives were developed based on public scoping and
participation, and the requirements of the BLM's Land Use Planning
Handbook (H-1601-1). The public involvement and collaboration process
included 9 public scoping meetings, 12 public meetings on the Draft
RMP/EIS, and meetings with other interested parties.
Four primary issues were raised and addressed through this planning
process. (1) Recreation, including how the BLM should manage recreation
to provide and maintain a diversity of experiences on BLM-managed
public lands while protecting subsistence
[[Page 55245]]
resources and opportunity, and what level of commercial recreational
permits is appropriate, particularly in the Squirrel River area; (2)
Subsistence, including maintaining and protecting subsistence uses; (3)
Minerals Management, determining which areas should be available for
mineral exploration and development; (4) Access/Travel Management,
allowing for access to BLM-managed public lands for various purposes.
In addition to these issues, the Proposed RMP/Final EIS addresses
management of various program areas such as vegetation, fish and
wildlife habitat, fire management, cultural resources, visual
resources, forest products, livestock grazing, and realty. The Proposed
RMP/Final EIS also resulted in development of required operating
procedures (ROP), which are requirements, procedures, management
practices, or design features the BLM adopts as operational
requirements for all permitted activities. The ROPs were developed to
ensure that Alaska Statewide Land Health Standards are met.
The Squirrel River area contains BLM-and-State-managed land, and is
surrounded by National Park Service-and Fish and Wildlife Service-
managed lands. Ultimately, the Northwest Arctic Borough will also be a
land owner. Approximately 14 percent of the public comments were
related to recreation and 7 percent were specific to the Squirrel
River. Relatively easy access to this area from Kotzebue by fixed-wing
aircraft, a large number of gravel bars that can be used for landing
strips, and the reduced level of regulation compared to other
surrounding federal lands, make the Squirrel River a popular
destination for hunters. Local subsistence hunters have expressed
concern about this area for more than a decade, raising issues such as
competition with subsistence hunters by large numbers of sport hunters,
potential deflection of migrating caribou away from subsistence
villages, waste of game meat, lack of enforcement, and unmanaged
commercial guiding/transporter operations. Alternatives B, C, and D of
the Proposed RMP/Final EIS all identify the Squirrel River as a special
recreation management area. One component of the BLM's preferred
alternative (D) is to maintain recreational use of the Squirrel River
at the current level while developing a recreation area management
plan. This recreation area management plan, developed in concert with
the State and Northwest Arctic Borough, both of which do or soon will
own land in the Squirrel River watershed, would develop special rules
to address the issues in the area.
As required by 43 CFR 1610.7-2, areas with potential for
designation as Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) have been
considered during the planning process. Approximately seven percent of
the total comments submitted during the public-comment period pertained
to ACECs. The Proposed RMP/Final EIS identifies six ACECs for
designation in the BLM's preferred alternative. Final acreage for areas
designated as ACECs will depend on the result of land conveyance to the
State of Alaska and Native Corporations. The following table provides a
summary of proposed ACECs and descriptions of resource use limitations
provided by decisions made in the proposed plan.
Table 1.--Proposed ACECs under Alternative D (preferred alternative) of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of area Acreage Resource use limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nulato Hills ACEC....................... 1.1 million................ Limited OHV designation.
Retained in Federal ownership.
Closed to grazing outside of existing
allotments.
Designate as ROW avoidance area.
Open to fluid mineral leasing subject to
special stipulations.
Open to locatable mineral entry subject
to required operating procedures.
Western Arctic Caribou Herd Insect 1.5 million................ Same as Nulato Hills except it would not
Relief ACEC. be designated as a ROW avoidance area
and the entire ACEC would be closed to
grazing.
Inglutalik Watershed ACEC............... 466,000.................... Same as Nulato Hills except it would not
be a ROW avoidance area.
Ungalik Watershed ACEC.................. 264,000.................... Same as Nulato Hills except it would not
be a ROW avoidance area.
Shaktoolik Watershed ACEC............... 234,000.................... Same as Nulato Hills except it would not
be a ROW avoidance area.
Mount Osborn ACEC....................... 82,000..................... Same as Nulato Hills except the level of
commercial recreational use may be
limited, it would be open to grazing,
and it would not be a ROW avoidance
area.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period on the Draft RMP/EIS the BLM
received nine additional ACEC nominations. The areas nominated were:
Coastal areas near Kivalina, Teller, Koyuk, and Unalakleet; the
Bendeleben and Darby mountains; the Agiapuk and American rivers; and
the multiple major pathways and convergence area of caribou migration
routes in the vicinity of Selawik-Kobuk. The BLM evaluated these areas
for possible ACEC designation and determined that designation was not
warranted. The BLM will not retain sufficient land in the Teller,
Kivalina and Koyuk areas to warrant designation, Unalakleet is outside
of the Planning Area, and the BLM does not administer any land along
the American River. The Bendeleben and Darby mountains and the Agiapuk
River have some relevant values but do not meet the importance criteria
defined under 43 CFR 1601.7-2. The caribou migration routes meet the
relevance criteria of supporting a significant wildlife resource.
However, data on caribou migration routes is not sufficient to support
the importance criteria. In fact, the limited data available seems to
indicate that caribou migrate less on BLM-managed public land and more
on private, National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and State
lands. The primary areas of BLM-managed public land in this migration
area are the Squirrel River, which was identified as a special
recreation management area where BLM proposes to develop a recreation
area management plan, and the northern Nulato Hills, which is within
the proposed Nulato Hills ACEC.
All comments received on the plan were analyzed and evaluated.
Appendix J of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS contains all substantive
comments received and BLM responses to those comments. Comments on the
Draft RMP/EIS received from the public and internal BLM review comments
were incorporated into the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. Public comments
resulted in changes to the preferred alternative through the addition
of clarifying text and additional analysis of impacts. A summary of
these changes is included in the Proposed RMP/Final EIS after the
Executive Summary.
[[Page 55246]]
Copies of the Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Proposed RMP/Final EIS have
been sent to affected Federal, State, and Local Government agencies and
to interested parties. Copies of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS have also
been sent to individuals, agencies, and groups as requested or as
required by regulation or policy. Copies of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS
are available for public inspection at the BLM Fairbanks District
Office at 1150 University Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska, during normal
business hours from 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
except holidays.
Interested persons may also view the Proposed RMP/Final EIS on the
Internet at https://www.ak.blm.gov/ksp or at one of the following
locations in Alaska: The BLM Fairbanks District Office, Fairbanks; BLM
Nome Field Station, Nome; BLM Anchorage Field Office, Anchorage; BLM
Alaska State Office, Public Room, Anchorage; Noel Wien Library,
Fairbanks; Keyoayah Kozga Library, Nome; Chukchi Consortium Library,
Kotzebue; Anchorage Municipal Library, Anchorage; Alaska State Library,
Juneau; Tuzzy Consortium Library, Barrow; Selawik National Wildlife
Refuge Headquarters, Kotzebue; Northwest Arctic Borough Planning
Department, Kotzebue.
E-mail and faxed protests will not be accepted as valid protests
unless the protesting party also provides the original letter by either
regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the protest period
to one of the following addresses, or as appropriate:
Regular Mail: Director (210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 66538, Washington, DC 20035.
Overnight Mail: Director (210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L Street, NW., Suite 1075,
Washington, DC 20036.
Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the e-mail or faxed
protest as an advance copy and it will receive full consideration. If
you wish to provide the BLM with such advance notification, please
direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator
at 202-452-5112, and e-mails to Brenda--Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your protest, you should be
aware that your entire protest--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your protest to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: August 20, 2007.
Julia Dougan,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. E7-19064 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P