Two Optional Methods for Relative Accuracy Test Audits of Mercury Monitoring Systems Installed on Combustion Flue Gas Streams and Several Amendments to Related Mercury Monitoring Provisions, 55278-55279 [C7-4147]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
55278
Corrections
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 188
Friday, September 28, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains editorial corrections of previously
published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,
and Notice documents. These corrections are
prepared by the Office of the Federal
Register. Agency prepared corrections are
issued as signed documents and appear in
the appropriate document categories
elsewhere in the issue.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60 and 75
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0164, FRL–8459–8]
RIN 2060–AO01
Two Optional Methods for Relative
Accuracy Test Audits of Mercury
Monitoring Systems Installed on
Combustion Flue Gas Streams and
Several Amendments to Related
Mercury Monitoring Provisions
September 7, 2007, make the following
corrections:
Appendix A–8 to Part 60 [Corrected]
1. On page 51507, in Appendix A–8
to Part 60, in Method 30A, in section
9.0, in the fourth column of the table,
in the tenth line from the bottom of the
column, ‘‘percentages..’’ should read
‘‘percentages.’’.
2. On the same page, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
fifth column of the table, in the third
line from the bottom of the column,
‘‘initial dynamic’’ should read ‘‘initial
run; dynamic’’.
3. On page 51508, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
table, entry ‘‘A’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
Correction
In rule document 07–4147 beginning
on page 51494 in the issue of Friday,
SUMMARY TABLE OF QA/QC REQUIREMENTS—Continued
Status1
A ..............
Process or element
Sample Point Selection
QA/QC specification
Acceptance criteria
*
*
*
Stratification Test (See
Section 8.1.3).
*
*
*
*
If the Hg concentration2 at each traverse point
during the stratification test is:
• Within ±5% of mean, use 1-point sampling
(at the point closest to the mean); or
• Not within ±5% of mean, but is within ±10%
of mean, use 3-point sampling. Locate
points according to Section 8.1.3.2.2 of this
method.
Alternatively, if the Hg concentration at each
point is:
• Within ±0.2 µg/m3 of mean, use 1-point
sampling (at the point closest to the mean);
or
• Not within ±0.2 µg/m3 of mean, but is within
±0.5 µg/m3 of mean, use 3-point sampling.
Locate points according to Section 8.1.3.2.2
of this method.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRCX
*
4. On page 51509, in the same
appendix, in section 12.1, in the first
column, in the 13th line from the
bottom of the column, ‘‘Cbaseline’’ should
¯
read ‘‘Cbaseline’’.
5. On the same page, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:14 Sep 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
*
third column, in the 16th line, ‘‘%;.’’
should read ‘‘%.’’.
6. On the same page, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
same column, in the 17th and 18th
lines, ‘‘R= Mean value of spike
recoveries at a particular target level,
¯
%;.’’ should read ‘‘R = Mean value of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4734
Sfmt 4734
Checking frequency
Prior to first run.
Prior to 1/1/09, you may
(1) forgo stratification
testing and use 3 sampling points (as per
Section 8.1.3.2.2) or
(2) perform a SO2
stratification test (see
Sections 6.5.6.1 and
6.5.6.3 of appendix A
to part 75), in lieu of a
Hg stratification test. If
the test location is
unstratified or minimally
stratified for SO2, it can
be considered
unstratified or minimally
stratified for Hg also.
*
spike recoveries at a particular target
level, %.’’.
7. On the same page, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
same column, in the 19th line, ‘‘%;.’’
should read ‘‘%.’’.
8. On page 51522, in the same
appendix, in Method 30B, in section
E:\FR\FM\28SECX.SGM
28SECX
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 188 / Friday, September 28, 2007 / Corrections
9.0, in the table, in the second column,
in the last two lines of the column,
‘‘<10% of section 1 Hg mass for Hg
concentrations > 1 µg/dscm;.’’ should
read ‘‘≤10% of section 1 Hg mass for Hg
concentrations > 1 µg/dscm;’’.
Appendix B to Part 60 [Corrected]
9. On page 51527, in Appendix B to
Part 60, in the second column, in
section 8.6.6.1, in the third line ‘‘Eq.
12A-1’’ should read ‘‘(Eq. 12A-1)’’.
11. On the same page, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
same table, in the fourth column, in the
third line, ‘‘Sample check invalidated’’
should read ‘‘Sample invalidated’’.
12. On the same page, in the same
appendix, in the same section, in the
same table, in the same column, in the
12th and 13th lines, ‘‘analysis samples
until successful’’ should read ‘‘analysis
until successful’’.
[FR Doc. C7–4147 Filed 9–27–07; 8:45 am]
Appendix K to Part 75 [Corrected]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRCX
10. On page 51530, in Appendix K to
Part 75, in section 8.0, in the table, in
the third column, in the 13th line,
‘‘analyzing field.’’ should read
‘‘analyzing field samples.’’.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:14 Sep 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
55279
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[USCBP–2006–0021; CBP Dec. 07–78]
Interpretive Rule Concerning
Classification of Unisex Footwear
Correction
In notice document E7–18588
beginning on page 53790 in the issue of
Thursday, September 20, 2007 make the
following correction:
On page 53790, in the first column, in
the ACTION heading, ‘‘Final interpretion’’
should read ‘‘Final interpretation’’.
[FR Doc. Z7–18588 Filed 9–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Frm 00002
Fmt 4734
Sfmt 4734
E:\FR\FM\28SECX.SGM
28SECX
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 188 (Friday, September 28, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Pages 55278-55279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C7-4147]
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 188 / Friday, September 28, 2007 /
Corrections
[[Page 55278]]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60 and 75
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0164, FRL-8459-8]
RIN 2060-AO01
Two Optional Methods for Relative Accuracy Test Audits of Mercury
Monitoring Systems Installed on Combustion Flue Gas Streams and Several
Amendments to Related Mercury Monitoring Provisions
Correction
In rule document 07-4147 beginning on page 51494 in the issue of
Friday, September 7, 2007, make the following corrections:
Appendix A-8 to Part 60 [Corrected]
1. On page 51507, in Appendix A-8 to Part 60, in Method 30A, in
section 9.0, in the fourth column of the table, in the tenth line from
the bottom of the column, ``percentages..'' should read
``percentages.''.
2. On the same page, in the same appendix, in the same section, in
the fifth column of the table, in the third line from the bottom of the
column, ``initial dynamic'' should read ``initial run; dynamic''.
3. On page 51508, in the same appendix, in the same section, in the
table, entry ``A'' is corrected to read as follows:
Summary Table of QA/QC Requirements--Continued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acceptance
Status\1\ Process or element QA/QC specification criteria Checking frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
A.............................. Sample Point Stratification Test (See If the Hg Prior to first
Selection Section 8.1.3). concentratio run.
n\2\ at each Prior to 1/1/09,
traverse you may (1) forgo
point during stratification
the testing and use 3
stratificati sampling points
on test is: (as per Section
8.1.3.2.2) or (2)
Within 5% of stratification
mean, use 1- test (see
point Sections 6.5.6.1
sampling (at and 6.5.6.3 of
the point appendix A to
closest to part 75), in lieu
the mean); of a Hg
or stratification
Not test. If the test
within 5% of unstratified or
mean, but is minimally
within 10% of SO2, it can be
mean, use 3- considered
point unstratified or
sampling. minimally
Locate stratified for Hg
points also.
according to
Section
8.1.3.2.2 of
this method.
Alternatively
, if the Hg
concentratio
n at each
point is:
Within 0.2
[mu]g/m\3\
of mean, use
1-point
sampling (at
the point
closest to
the mean);
or
Not
within 0.2
[mu]g/m\3\
of mean, but
is within
0.5
[mu]g/m\3\
of mean, use
3-point
sampling.
Locate
points
according to
Section
8.1.3.2.2 of
this method.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. On page 51509, in the same appendix, in section 12.1, in the
first column, in the 13th line from the bottom of the column,
``Cbaseline'' should read ``Cbaseline''.
5. On the same page, in the same appendix, in the same section, in
the third column, in the 16th line, ``%;.'' should read ``%.''.
6. On the same page, in the same appendix, in the same section, in
the same column, in the 17th and 18th lines, ``R= Mean value of spike
recoveries at a particular target level, %;.'' should read ``R = Mean
value of spike recoveries at a particular target level, %.''.
7. On the same page, in the same appendix, in the same section, in
the same column, in the 19th line, ``%;.'' should read ``%.''.
8. On page 51522, in the same appendix, in Method 30B, in section
[[Page 55279]]
9.0, in the table, in the second column, in the last two lines of the
column, ``<10% of section 1 Hg mass for Hg concentrations > 1 [mu]g/
dscm;.'' should read ``<=10% of section 1 Hg mass for Hg concentrations
> 1 [mu]g/dscm;''.
Appendix B to Part 60 [Corrected]
9. On page 51527, in Appendix B to Part 60, in the second column,
in section 8.6.6.1, in the third line ``Eq. 12A-1'' should read ``(Eq.
12A-1)''.
Appendix K to Part 75 [Corrected]
10. On page 51530, in Appendix K to Part 75, in section 8.0, in the
table, in the third column, in the 13th line, ``analyzing field.''
should read ``analyzing field samples.''.
11. On the same page, in the same appendix, in the same section, in
the same table, in the fourth column, in the third line, ``Sample check
invalidated'' should read ``Sample invalidated''.
12. On the same page, in the same appendix, in the same section, in
the same table, in the same column, in the 12th and 13th lines,
``analysis samples until successful'' should read ``analysis until
successful''.
[FR Doc. C7-4147 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
