Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, Dillingham, AK, 54921-54922 [E7-19086]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 187 / Thursday, September 27, 2007 / Notices information from public review, we cannot guarantee that it will be done. Dated: August 22, 2007 Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service. FR Doc. E7–19144 Filed 9–26–07; 8:45 pm Billing Code 4310–55–S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, Dillingham, AK U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability of the Draft Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Draft Revised Public Use Management Plan, and Environmental Assessment for Togiak National Wildlife Refuge; request for comments. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service, we) announce that the Draft Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and Environmental Assessment (EA) and Draft Revised Public Use Management Plan (PUMP) and EA for Togiak National Wildlife Refuge is available for public comment. This Draft CCP/PUMP/ EA describes how the Service intends to manage the Togiak Refuge for the next 15 years. DATES: We must receive written comments on the draft CCP/PUMP/EA by January 18, 2008. ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to request a paper copy or a compact disk of the Draft CCP/PUMP/ EA, contact Maggi Arend, Planning Team Leader, Division of Comprehensive Planning and Policy, MS 231, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503–6199, phone 907–786–3393, fax 907–786–3965 or electronically at fw7_togiak_planning@fws.gov. You may also view or download the plan at: https://alaska.fws.gov/nwr/planning/ togpol.htm. Copies of the Draft plan may be viewed at the Togiak Refuge Office in Dillingham, Alaska; local area libraries, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Office in Anchorage, Alaska. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggi Arend at the above address or phone number. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 410hh et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1602 et seq.) requires development of a CCP for all VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Sep 26, 2007 Jkt 211001 national wildlife refuges in Alaska. The Draft CCP for Togiak Refuge was developed consistent with Section 304(g) of ANILCA and the Refuge Administration Act as amended by the Refuge Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). The purpose of developing CCPs is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish, wildlife, and habitat management and conservation; legal mandates; and Service policies. Plans define long-term goals and objectives toward which refuge management activities are directed and identify which uses may be compatible with the purposes of the refuge. They identify wildlifedependent recreation opportunities available to the public, including hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. Comprehensive conservation plans are updated in accordance with planning direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA and with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Togiak Refuge was established as Cape Newenham National Wildlife Refuge in 1969 to protect and preserve the outstanding wildlife values, including bird colonies and important habitat for other terrestrial and marine wildlife. The refuge was expanded to 4,156,522 acres and established as Togiak National Wildlife Refuge in 1980 by ANILCA. The Togiak Refuge CCP was approved in 1987. The PUMP was approved in 1991 and incorporated the State of Alaska Special Land Use Designation for the management of State lands within the boundary of the refuge and including the lower Goodnews River drainage. The current document includes revisions of each of these three plans. The core planning team, which developed the range of alternatives for the CCP/PUMP, included representatives of the State of Alaska and five recognized Native Alaskan tribes from the vicinity of the refuge. Comprehensive Plan This Draft CCP describes and evaluates two alternatives for managing Togiak Refuge for the next 15 years. Alternative 1: This alternative encompasses policy development, changes, and clarifications made in the years since the implementation of the original Comprehensive Plan in 1987. It also includes a refuge vision statement, goals, objectives, and certain strategies which will guide refuge management into the future. Restrictions on PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54921 helicopter use for recreational purposes would be maintained. Alternative 2 (Current Management): Under this alternative, the Refuge would continue to implement current management as outlined in the 1987 Comprehensive Plan. The Refuge would continue to be managed much as it is today, but without goals and objectives. Public Use Plan The Draft Public Use Management Plan describes and evaluates five alternatives for managing public use on Togiak Refuge. These alternatives address four issues: public use at Cape Peirce Wildlife Viewing Area; unguided recreational opportunites in the Kanektok and Goodnews river watersheds; human waste management; and commercial sport fishing guide opportunities. Alternative A: This alternative would carry forward existing management into the future. At Cape Peirce, management would emphasize wildlife viewing that complements the research and study of fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats and would continue current limits on visitors to the area. There would be no limits on unguided recreational users on the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers and no additional management of human waste disposal. Commercial sport fishing guide opportunities would remain at current levels. Alternative B: This alternative makes limited adjustments to current management. At Cape Peirce, management would remain the same except that 50% of permits would be allocated to the general public. Unguided use of the Kanektok River watershed would be limited to the same levels currently allowed for guided use. On the Goodnews River, unguided use would be limited to the current level of use. Commercial sport fishing guide opportunities would be expanded on the middle fork of the Goodnews River. Alternative C (the preferred alternative): Under this alternative, adjustments would be made to management in each of the issue areas. At Cape Peirce, management would facilitate wildlife viewing that complements the protection and preservation of the area’s natural and cultural resource values and opportunities for visitation would be doubled. The allocation of permits would be the same as Alternative B, but at low use levels the refuge manager may waive the requirement for permits. Minimal facilities could be constructed for public health and safety. Limits on the unguided recreational use of the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers would be established for the peak use periods E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1 54922 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 187 / Thursday, September 27, 2007 / Notices only. The refuge would work with partners to facilitate the voluntary use of approved disposal sites for human waste. Guided motorized access to the North Fork Goodnews River would be limited from current maximum allowable levels but would be above current use levels. Alternative D: This alternative would provide additional opportunities for commercially guided recreation throughout the refuge. At Cape Peirce, opportunities for visiting the area would be doubled from current levels and would be commercially guided. Unguided recreation on the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers would remain unrestricted. Additional commercial sport fishing guide opportunities would be provided on the Goodnews, Togiak, Osviak, and Matogak rivers. Alternative E: This alternative would reduce the level of use on the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers and implement a human waste pack out program on the Kanektok River. It would also provide additional opportunities for public use at Cape Peirce. Commercial sport fishing guide opportunities would be continued at current levels. Public Availability of Comments Before including your name, address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: September 21, 2007. Thomas O. Melius, Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. [FR Doc. E7–19086 Filed 9–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Virgin River Habitat Conservation and Recovery Program, Clark County, NV Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) and notice of public meetings. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), advises the public that we intend to VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Sep 26, 2007 Jkt 211001 gather information necessary to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) regarding the proposed Virgin River Habitat Conservation and Recovery Program (VRHCRP) and issuance of an incidental take permit (Permit) for endangered and threatened species in accordance with section 10(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The intent of the VRHCRP is to provide a recovery strategy for five species in the Lower Virgin River Basin. The VRHRCP would be used as a tool when conducting future section 7 consultations, implementing recovery actions and preparing habitat conservation plans for new and existing development. We provide this notice to: (1) Describe the proposed action and possible alternatives; (2) advise other Federal and State agencies, affected tribes, and the public of our intent to prepare an EIS; (3) announce the initiation of a 30day public scoping period; and (4) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues to be included in the EIS. DATES: Written comments from all interested parties must be received on or before October 29, 2007. Public meetings will be held on October 16 and 17, 2007 from 4 to 6 p.m. ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be held at the following locations: October 16, 2007 from 4 to 6 p.m. at the Federal Interagency Building, 4701 North Torrey Pines Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89130; and October 17, 2007 from 4 to 6 p.m. at Mesquite City Hall, 10 East Mesquite Blvd., Mesquite, NV 89027. Information, written comments, or questions related to the preparation of the EIS and NEPA process should be sent to Robert D. Williams, Field Supervisor, Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, Fish and Wildlife Service, 4701 North Torrey Pines Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89130; or fax (702) 515–5231. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy LaVoie, Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, Fish and Wildlife Service, 4701 North Torrey Pines Dr., Las Vegas, Nevada 89130, or at (702) 515–5230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Reasonable Accommodation Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and participate in the public meeting should contact Amy LaVoie (See ADDRESSES) at (702) 515–5230 as soon as possible. In order to allow sufficient time to process requests, please call no later than one week before the public meeting. Information regarding this proposed action is available in other formats upon request. PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Background The Service together with the Bureau of Land Management, City of Mesquite, Clark County, National Park Service, Nevada Department of Wildlife, Southern Nevada Water Authority, and Virgin Valley Water District propose to develop the VRHCRP. The intent of the VRHCRP is to provide a recovery strategy for five species in the Lower Virgin River Basin: Virgin River chub (Gila seminuda), woundfin (Plagopterus argentissimus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), Yuma clapper rail (Rallus longirostris yumanensis), and yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). Species may be added or deleted during the course of the development of the VRHCRP based on further analysis, new information, agency consultation, and public comment. The VRHRCP would be used by the participating agencies as a tool when conducting future section 7 consultations, implementing recovery actions and preparing habitat conservation plans. The area to be addressed within the proposed VRHCRP would be all lands within the the 100-year floodplain of the Virgin River and its tributaries (including ephemeral washes) from the Mesquite Diversion (located approximately 2 miles upstream of the Nevada/Arizona border) to the confluence of Lake Mead, as defined by a line from the southern end of Lower Mormon Mesa, through Fish Island, to Little Bitter Wash. In addition, some recovery actions may be expanded to include all land within the 100-year floodplain of the Virgin River and its tributaries from the Mesquite Diversion upstream to the base of the Virgin River Gorge in Arizona or to the location of the future non-native fish barrier to be established by the Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program (Utah program). The VRHCRP would contain a habitat conservation plan (HCP) for the City of Mesquite and Clark County (Permit Applicants). The HCP would result in take authorization for otherwise lawful actions, such as municipal and private development that may incidentally take or harm animal species or their habitats within the HCP area. Conservation measures to offset the effects on the covered species from proposed development activities would be developed and implemented. The applicants propose to expand the city limits of Mesquite and unincorporated Clark County in and near the township or area of Bunkerville and Riverside, and implement conservation measures for the resulting development activities, E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 187 (Thursday, September 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54921-54922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-19086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, Dillingham, AK

AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the Draft Revised Comprehensive 
Conservation Plan, Draft Revised Public Use Management Plan, and 
Environmental Assessment for Togiak National Wildlife Refuge; request 
for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service, we) announce 
that the Draft Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and 
Environmental Assessment (EA) and Draft Revised Public Use Management 
Plan (PUMP) and EA for Togiak National Wildlife Refuge is available for 
public comment. This Draft CCP/PUMP/EA describes how the Service 
intends to manage the Togiak Refuge for the next 15 years.

DATES: We must receive written comments on the draft CCP/PUMP/EA by 
January 18, 2008.

ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to request a paper copy or a 
compact disk of the Draft CCP/PUMP/EA, contact Maggi Arend, Planning 
Team Leader, Division of Comprehensive Planning and Policy, MS 231, 
1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503-6199, phone 907-786-3393, fax 
907-786-3965 or electronically at fw7_togiak_planning@fws.gov. You 
may also view or download the plan at: https://alaska.fws.gov/nwr/
planning/togpol.htm. Copies of the Draft plan may be viewed at the 
Togiak Refuge Office in Dillingham, Alaska; local area libraries, and 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Office in Anchorage, 
Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggi Arend at the above address or 
phone number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Alaska National Interest Lands 
Conservation Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 410hh et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1602 et 
seq.) requires development of a CCP for all national wildlife refuges 
in Alaska. The Draft CCP for Togiak Refuge was developed consistent 
with Section 304(g) of ANILCA and the Refuge Administration Act as 
amended by the Refuge Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). The 
purpose of developing CCPs is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year 
strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the 
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound 
principles of fish, wildlife, and habitat management and conservation; 
legal mandates; and Service policies. Plans define long-term goals and 
objectives toward which refuge management activities are directed and 
identify which uses may be compatible with the purposes of the refuge. 
They identify wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities available to 
the public, including hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. 
Comprehensive conservation plans are updated in accordance with 
planning direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA and with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.).
    Togiak Refuge was established as Cape Newenham National Wildlife 
Refuge in 1969 to protect and preserve the outstanding wildlife values, 
including bird colonies and important habitat for other terrestrial and 
marine wildlife. The refuge was expanded to 4,156,522 acres and 
established as Togiak National Wildlife Refuge in 1980 by ANILCA. The 
Togiak Refuge CCP was approved in 1987. The PUMP was approved in 1991 
and incorporated the State of Alaska Special Land Use Designation for 
the management of State lands within the boundary of the refuge and 
including the lower Goodnews River drainage. The current document 
includes revisions of each of these three plans. The core planning 
team, which developed the range of alternatives for the CCP/PUMP, 
included representatives of the State of Alaska and five recognized 
Native Alaskan tribes from the vicinity of the refuge.

Comprehensive Plan

    This Draft CCP describes and evaluates two alternatives for 
managing Togiak Refuge for the next 15 years.
    Alternative 1: This alternative encompasses policy development, 
changes, and clarifications made in the years since the implementation 
of the original Comprehensive Plan in 1987. It also includes a refuge 
vision statement, goals, objectives, and certain strategies which will 
guide refuge management into the future. Restrictions on helicopter use 
for recreational purposes would be maintained.
    Alternative 2 (Current Management): Under this alternative, the 
Refuge would continue to implement current management as outlined in 
the 1987 Comprehensive Plan. The Refuge would continue to be managed 
much as it is today, but without goals and objectives.

Public Use Plan

    The Draft Public Use Management Plan describes and evaluates five 
alternatives for managing public use on Togiak Refuge. These 
alternatives address four issues: public use at Cape Peirce Wildlife 
Viewing Area; unguided recreational opportunites in the Kanektok and 
Goodnews river watersheds; human waste management; and commercial sport 
fishing guide opportunities.
    Alternative A: This alternative would carry forward existing 
management into the future. At Cape Peirce, management would emphasize 
wildlife viewing that complements the research and study of fish, 
wildlife, plants, and their habitats and would continue current limits 
on visitors to the area. There would be no limits on unguided 
recreational users on the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers and no 
additional management of human waste disposal. Commercial sport fishing 
guide opportunities would remain at current levels.
    Alternative B: This alternative makes limited adjustments to 
current management. At Cape Peirce, management would remain the same 
except that 50% of permits would be allocated to the general public. 
Unguided use of the Kanektok River watershed would be limited to the 
same levels currently allowed for guided use. On the Goodnews River, 
unguided use would be limited to the current level of use. Commercial 
sport fishing guide opportunities would be expanded on the middle fork 
of the Goodnews River.
    Alternative C (the preferred alternative): Under this alternative, 
adjustments would be made to management in each of the issue areas. At 
Cape Peirce, management would facilitate wildlife viewing that 
complements the protection and preservation of the area's natural and 
cultural resource values and opportunities for visitation would be 
doubled. The allocation of permits would be the same as Alternative B, 
but at low use levels the refuge manager may waive the requirement for 
permits. Minimal facilities could be constructed for public health and 
safety. Limits on the unguided recreational use of the Kanektok and 
Goodnews rivers would be established for the peak use periods

[[Page 54922]]

only. The refuge would work with partners to facilitate the voluntary 
use of approved disposal sites for human waste. Guided motorized access 
to the North Fork Goodnews River would be limited from current maximum 
allowable levels but would be above current use levels.
    Alternative D: This alternative would provide additional 
opportunities for commercially guided recreation throughout the refuge. 
At Cape Peirce, opportunities for visiting the area would be doubled 
from current levels and would be commercially guided. Unguided 
recreation on the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers would remain 
unrestricted. Additional commercial sport fishing guide opportunities 
would be provided on the Goodnews, Togiak, Osviak, and Matogak rivers.
    Alternative E: This alternative would reduce the level of use on 
the Kanektok and Goodnews rivers and implement a human waste pack out 
program on the Kanektok River. It would also provide additional 
opportunities for public use at Cape Peirce. Commercial sport fishing 
guide opportunities would be continued at current levels.

Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your name, address, phone number, e-mail address, 
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should 
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: September 21, 2007.
Thomas O. Melius,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
 [FR Doc. E7-19086 Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.