Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Change in Requirements for Interhandler Transfers of Raisins, 54341-54343 [E7-18794]
Download as PDF
54341
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 185
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0083; FV07–989–
3 FIR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California; Change in Requirements
for Interhandler Transfers of Raisins
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule changing the requirements for
interhandler transfers of raisins under
the administrative rules and regulations
of the California raisin marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California and is administered locally
by the Raisin Administrative California
(Committee or RAC). This rule
continues in effect the action that
requires handlers who transfer raisins to
other handlers within the State of
California to certify to the Committee
that only acquired, free-tonnage raisins
that meet all applicable order
requirements are being transferred to
receiving handlers. This action helps
maintain the integrity of the order by
ensuring that handlers only transfer
acquired, free-tonnage raisins that meet
applicable order requirements.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov, or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989),
both as amended, regulating the
handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect revisions
to the requirements for interhandler
transfers of raisins under the
administrative rules and regulations of
the California raisin order. This rule
requires handlers who transfer raisins to
other handlers within the State of
California to certify to the Committee
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that only acquired, free-tonnage raisins
that meet all applicable order
requirements are being transferred.
Pursuant to § 989.17, ‘‘acquire means
to have or obtain physical possession of
raisins by a handler at his packing or
processing plant or at any other
established receiving station operated
by him.’’ However, handlers are not
deemed to acquire raisins if they are
being stored for another, being
reconditioned, or held for inspection.
Also the term only applies to the
handler who first obtains possession of
the raisins. Free tonnage raisins are
those raisins which have been acquired,
not placed in the reserve pool, and for
which producers receive payment for
100 percent of handler purchases. This
change helps maintain the integrity of
the order and was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting on April 12, 2007.
Section 989.59(e) of the order
provides authority for handlers who
acquire free-tonnage raisins to transfer
such raisins to other handlers within the
State of California. It also specifies that
transferring handlers shall promptly
report such transfers to the Committee,
unless transfers are between plants
owned or operated by the same handler.
Further, it specifies that receiving
handlers shall comply with all
applicable order requirements before
shipping or otherwise making final
disposition of such raisins.
Section 989.73 of the order provides
authority for the RAC to collect reports
from handlers and specifies that, upon
request by the RAC, with the approval
of the Secretary, handlers shall furnish
to the RAC other information as may be
necessary to enable it to exercise its
powers and perform its duties. The RAC
meets routinely to make decisions on
various programs authorized under the
order such as interhandler transfers. The
RAC utilizes information collected
under the order in its decision making.
Section 989.173 of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations
specifies certain reports that handlers
are currently required to submit to the
RAC. Under § 989.173(d)(1) of the
order’s rules and regulations any
handler who transfers free-tonnage
raisins to another handler within the
State of California shall submit a report
to the Committee showing information
regarding the interhandler transfer not
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
54342
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
later than five calendar days following
such transfer.
Such information includes the
transfer date; the names and addresses
of the transferring parties; the varietal
type, net weight, and condition of the
raisins transferred; and the inspection
certificate number, if the raisins have
already been packed. Transferring
handlers are required to forward two
copies of the RAC Form No. 6,
‘‘Interhandler Transfers of Free-Tonnage
Raisins,’’ to the receiving handler at the
same time the report is submitted to the
Committee. The receiving handler is
required to certify receiving the raisins
and to submit one copy of the
certification report to the Committee
within five calendar days of receiving
the raisins or the copies of RAC Form
No. 6, whichever is later.
The Committee is concerned that
some handlers may be transferring
California raisins which are not
acquired or which do not meet all
applicable order requirements. Such
requirements include proper reporting,
inspection, assessments, and volume
regulation. To help ensure that handlers
only transfer acquired, free-tonnage
raisins that meet all applicable order
requirements, the Committee
unanimously recommended that
transferring handlers certify on RAC
Form No. 6, ‘‘Interhandler Transfer of
Free-Tonnage Raisins,’’ that only
acquired, free-tonnage raisins that meet
all applicable order requirements are
being transferred. The Committee
expects that requiring this certification
should help maintain the integrity of the
order.
This rule continues to modify
§ 989.173(d)(1) by deleting the word
‘‘and’’ from paragraph (iii); by changing
the period to a semi-colon and adding
the word ‘‘and’’ at end of paragraph (iv);
and by adding a new subparagraph (v),
which requires handlers to certify that
the raisins being transferred are
acquired, free-tonnage raisins that meet
all applicable order requirements
including proper reporting, incoming
inspection, assessments, and volume
regulation.
The RAC Form No. 6, ‘‘Interhandler
Transfer of Free-Tonnage Raisins’’ has
been modified by the addition of the
following paragraph: ‘‘To Be Completed
by Transferring Handler: The
undersigned certifies that the raisins
being transferred have met all Federal
order requirements, including proper
reporting, incoming inspection,
assessments, and volume regulations, if
applicable.’’ No additional reporting
burden is placed upon handlers.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 23 handlers
of California raisins who are subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 4,000 raisin producers in
the regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. No more than 10 handlers,
and a majority of producers, of
California raisins may be classified as
small entities. Thirteen of the 23
handlers subject to regulation have
annual sales estimated to be at least
$6,500,000, and the remaining 10
handlers have sales less than
$6,500,000.
This rule continues to revise
§ 989.173(d)(1) of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations and
requires handlers who transfer raisins to
other handlers to certify on RAC Form
No. 6, ‘‘Interhandler Transfer of FreeTonnage Raisins,’’ that only acquired,
free-tonnage raisins that meet all
applicable order requirements are being
transferred. This helps maintain the
integrity of the order. Authority for
interhandler transfers is provided in
§ 989.59, and authority to recommend
this change is provided in § 989.73 of
the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on
affected entities, it continues to require
handlers who transfer raisins to other
handlers to certify on RAC Form No. 6,
‘‘Interhandler Transfer of Free-Tonnage
Raisins,’’ that such raisins are acquired,
free-tonnage raisins that meet all
applicable order requirements.
The Committee considered not
requiring handlers to certify that their
transferred raisins are acquired freetonnage raisins and that they meet all
applicable order requirements.
However, the Committee was concerned
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that some handlers may be transferring
California raisins which are not
acquired or which do not meet all
applicable order requirements. Such
requirements include proper reporting,
incoming inspection, assessments, and
volume regulation. As receiving
handlers want additional assurance that
they are receiving raisins which have
been acquired and which meet
applicable order requirements, the
Committee unanimously recommended
revising the requirements regarding
interhandler transfers of free-tonnage
raisins.
All handlers must currently report
their interhandler transfers to the
Committee on RAC Form No. 6,
‘‘Interhandler Transfer of Free-Tonnage
Raisins.’’ This form is currently
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB No.
0581–0178, Vegetable and Specialty
Crops. This rule continues to add a
certifying statement above the
transferring handler’s signature block to
this form.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
raisin handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by the industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, as noted in
the final regulatory flexibility analysis,
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee’s meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
California raisin industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
deliberations on all issues. The
Committee’s Administrative Issues
Work Group discussed this issue at
length during meetings on January 23,
and February 1, 2007. The
Administrative Issues Subcommittee
thus recommended the change to the
Committee on April 12, 2007. All of
these meetings were public meetings
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on August 7, 2007. Copies of
the rule were also mailed to Committee
members and alternates and all raisin
handlers. In addition, the rule was made
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
available through the Internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register.
That rule provided for a 15-day
comment period which ended on
August 22, 2007. One comment
supporting the rule was received. The
commenter concurred that this action
helps to maintain the integrity of the
order.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
materials presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that
finalizing this interim final rule,
without change, as published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 44029, August
7, 2007), will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 989 which was
published at 72 FR 44029 on August 7,
2007, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
I
Dated: September 19, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–18794 Filed 9–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0071; FV07–989–
2 FR]
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California; Use of Estimated Trade
Demand To Compute Volume
Regulation Percentages
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule provides for use of
an estimated trade demand figure to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
compute volume regulation percentages
for 2007–08 crop Natural (sun-dried)
Seedless (NS) raisins covered under the
Federal marketing order for California
raisins (order). The order regulates the
handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California and is
administered locally by the Raisin
Administrative Committee (Committee).
This rule provides parameters for
implementing volume regulation for
2007–08 crop NS raisins, if supplies are
short, for the purposes of maintaining a
portion of the industry’s export markets
and stabilizing the domestic market.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 989 (7 CFR
part 989), both as amended, regulating
the handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is applicable to
the 2007–08 crop year, which began on
August 1, 2007, and runs through July
31, 2008. This final rule will not
preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54343
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule provides for use of an
estimated trade demand figure to
compute volume regulation percentages
for 2007–08 crop NS raisins covered
under the order. This rule provides
parameters for implementing volume
regulation for 2007–08 crop NS raisins,
if supplies are short, for the purposes of
maintaining a portion of the industry’s
export markets and stabilizing the
domestic market. This action was
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a meeting on April 12,
2007.
Volume Regulation Authority
The order provides authority for
volume regulation designed to promote
orderly marketing conditions, stabilize
prices and supplies, and improve
producer returns. When volume
regulation is in effect, a certain
percentage of the California raisin crop
may be sold by handlers to any market
(free tonnage), while the remaining
percentage must be held by handlers in
a reserve pool (reserve) for the account
of the Committee. Reserve raisins are
disposed of through certain programs
authorized under the order. For
instance, reserve raisins may be sold by
the Committee to handlers for free use
or to replace part of the free tonnage
raisins they exported; used in diversion
programs; carried over as a hedge
against a short crop the following year;
or disposed of in other outlets not
competitive with those for free tonnage
raisins, such as government purchase,
distilleries, or animal feed. Net proceeds
from sales of reserve raisins are
distributed to the reserve pool’s equity
holders, primarily producers.
Section 989.54 of the order prescribes
procedures and time frames to be
followed in establishing volume
regulation for each crop year, which
runs from August 1 through July 31. The
Committee must meet by August 15 to
review data regarding raisin supplies. At
that time, the Committee computes a
trade demand for each varietal type of
raisins for which a free tonnage
percentage might be recommended.
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54341-54343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18794]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 54341]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0083; FV07-989-3 FIR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Change in
Requirements for Interhandler Transfers of Raisins
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule changing the requirements
for interhandler transfers of raisins under the administrative rules
and regulations of the California raisin marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California and is administered locally by the Raisin Administrative
California (Committee or RAC). This rule continues in effect the action
that requires handlers who transfer raisins to other handlers within
the State of California to certify to the Committee that only acquired,
free-tonnage raisins that meet all applicable order requirements are
being transferred to receiving handlers. This action helps maintain the
integrity of the order by ensuring that handlers only transfer
acquired, free-tonnage raisins that meet applicable order requirements.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist,
or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov, or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989), both as amended,
regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect revisions to the requirements for
interhandler transfers of raisins under the administrative rules and
regulations of the California raisin order. This rule requires handlers
who transfer raisins to other handlers within the State of California
to certify to the Committee that only acquired, free-tonnage raisins
that meet all applicable order requirements are being transferred.
Pursuant to Sec. 989.17, ``acquire means to have or obtain
physical possession of raisins by a handler at his packing or
processing plant or at any other established receiving station operated
by him.'' However, handlers are not deemed to acquire raisins if they
are being stored for another, being reconditioned, or held for
inspection. Also the term only applies to the handler who first obtains
possession of the raisins. Free tonnage raisins are those raisins which
have been acquired, not placed in the reserve pool, and for which
producers receive payment for 100 percent of handler purchases. This
change helps maintain the integrity of the order and was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a public meeting on April 12, 2007.
Section 989.59(e) of the order provides authority for handlers who
acquire free-tonnage raisins to transfer such raisins to other handlers
within the State of California. It also specifies that transferring
handlers shall promptly report such transfers to the Committee, unless
transfers are between plants owned or operated by the same handler.
Further, it specifies that receiving handlers shall comply with all
applicable order requirements before shipping or otherwise making final
disposition of such raisins.
Section 989.73 of the order provides authority for the RAC to
collect reports from handlers and specifies that, upon request by the
RAC, with the approval of the Secretary, handlers shall furnish to the
RAC other information as may be necessary to enable it to exercise its
powers and perform its duties. The RAC meets routinely to make
decisions on various programs authorized under the order such as
interhandler transfers. The RAC utilizes information collected under
the order in its decision making.
Section 989.173 of the order's administrative rules and regulations
specifies certain reports that handlers are currently required to
submit to the RAC. Under Sec. 989.173(d)(1) of the order's rules and
regulations any handler who transfers free-tonnage raisins to another
handler within the State of California shall submit a report to the
Committee showing information regarding the interhandler transfer not
[[Page 54342]]
later than five calendar days following such transfer.
Such information includes the transfer date; the names and
addresses of the transferring parties; the varietal type, net weight,
and condition of the raisins transferred; and the inspection
certificate number, if the raisins have already been packed.
Transferring handlers are required to forward two copies of the RAC
Form No. 6, ``Interhandler Transfers of Free-Tonnage Raisins,'' to the
receiving handler at the same time the report is submitted to the
Committee. The receiving handler is required to certify receiving the
raisins and to submit one copy of the certification report to the
Committee within five calendar days of receiving the raisins or the
copies of RAC Form No. 6, whichever is later.
The Committee is concerned that some handlers may be transferring
California raisins which are not acquired or which do not meet all
applicable order requirements. Such requirements include proper
reporting, inspection, assessments, and volume regulation. To help
ensure that handlers only transfer acquired, free-tonnage raisins that
meet all applicable order requirements, the Committee unanimously
recommended that transferring handlers certify on RAC Form No. 6,
``Interhandler Transfer of Free-Tonnage Raisins,'' that only acquired,
free-tonnage raisins that meet all applicable order requirements are
being transferred. The Committee expects that requiring this
certification should help maintain the integrity of the order.
This rule continues to modify Sec. 989.173(d)(1) by deleting the
word ``and'' from paragraph (iii); by changing the period to a semi-
colon and adding the word ``and'' at end of paragraph (iv); and by
adding a new subparagraph (v), which requires handlers to certify that
the raisins being transferred are acquired, free-tonnage raisins that
meet all applicable order requirements including proper reporting,
incoming inspection, assessments, and volume regulation.
The RAC Form No. 6, ``Interhandler Transfer of Free-Tonnage
Raisins'' has been modified by the addition of the following paragraph:
``To Be Completed by Transferring Handler: The undersigned certifies
that the raisins being transferred have met all Federal order
requirements, including proper reporting, incoming inspection,
assessments, and volume regulations, if applicable.'' No additional
reporting burden is placed upon handlers.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 23 handlers of California raisins who are
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 4,000 raisin
producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000. No more than 10 handlers, and a majority of
producers, of California raisins may be classified as small entities.
Thirteen of the 23 handlers subject to regulation have annual sales
estimated to be at least $6,500,000, and the remaining 10 handlers have
sales less than $6,500,000.
This rule continues to revise Sec. 989.173(d)(1) of the order's
administrative rules and regulations and requires handlers who transfer
raisins to other handlers to certify on RAC Form No. 6, ``Interhandler
Transfer of Free-Tonnage Raisins,'' that only acquired, free-tonnage
raisins that meet all applicable order requirements are being
transferred. This helps maintain the integrity of the order. Authority
for interhandler transfers is provided in Sec. 989.59, and authority
to recommend this change is provided in Sec. 989.73 of the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on affected entities, it
continues to require handlers who transfer raisins to other handlers to
certify on RAC Form No. 6, ``Interhandler Transfer of Free-Tonnage
Raisins,'' that such raisins are acquired, free-tonnage raisins that
meet all applicable order requirements.
The Committee considered not requiring handlers to certify that
their transferred raisins are acquired free-tonnage raisins and that
they meet all applicable order requirements. However, the Committee was
concerned that some handlers may be transferring California raisins
which are not acquired or which do not meet all applicable order
requirements. Such requirements include proper reporting, incoming
inspection, assessments, and volume regulation. As receiving handlers
want additional assurance that they are receiving raisins which have
been acquired and which meet applicable order requirements, the
Committee unanimously recommended revising the requirements regarding
interhandler transfers of free-tonnage raisins.
All handlers must currently report their interhandler transfers to
the Committee on RAC Form No. 6, ``Interhandler Transfer of Free-
Tonnage Raisins.'' This form is currently approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and
Specialty Crops. This rule continues to add a certifying statement
above the transferring handler's signature block to this form.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large raisin handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by the
industry and public sector agencies. In addition, as noted in the final
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout
the California raisin industry and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meetings and participate in deliberations on all issues.
The Committee's Administrative Issues Work Group discussed this issue
at length during meetings on January 23, and February 1, 2007. The
Administrative Issues Subcommittee thus recommended the change to the
Committee on April 12, 2007. All of these meetings were public meetings
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on
this issue.
An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on August 7, 2007. Copies of the rule were also mailed
to Committee members and alternates and all raisin handlers. In
addition, the rule was made
[[Page 54343]]
available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. That rule provided for a 15-day comment period which ended on
August 22, 2007. One comment supporting the rule was received. The
commenter concurred that this action helps to maintain the integrity of
the order.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant materials presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
finalizing this interim final rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 44029, August 7, 2007), will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 989 which was
published at 72 FR 44029 on August 7, 2007, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: September 19, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-18794 Filed 9-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P