Modification of the Rules and Procedures Governing the Provision of International Telecommunications Service, 54363-54367 [E7-18777]
Download as PDF
54363
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
area has attained the 1-hour ozone
standard and that the following
requirements of section 172(c)(2) of the
Clean Air Act do not apply to this area
for so long as the area does not monitor
any violations of the 1-hour ozone
standard of 40 CFR 50.9: the attainment
demonstration and reasonably available
control measure requirements of section
172(b)(1), the reasonable further
progress requirement of section
172(b)(2), and the related contingency
requirements of section 172(c)(9). If a
violation of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS is
monitored in the Franklin County
1-hour ozone nonattainment area, these
determinations shall no longer apply.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 81.339, the table entitled
‘‘Pennsylvania-Ozone (8-Hour
Standard)’’ is amended by revising the
entry for the Franklin County, PA Area
to read as follows:
I
PART 81—[AMENDED]
§ 81.339
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
*
I
*
Pennsylvania.
*
*
*
PENNSYLVANIA—OZONE (8–HOUR STANDARD)
Designation a
Category/classification
Designated area
Date 1
*
*
Type
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Franklin Co., PA: Franklin County ........................... July 27, 2007 ..................
*
Date 1
*
*
Type
Attainment.
*
a Includes
Indian County located in each county or area, except otherwise noted.
1 This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–18835 Filed 9–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 63
[IB Docket No. 04–47; FCC 07–118]
Modification of the Rules and
Procedures Governing the Provision of
International Telecommunications
Service
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this Report and Order, the
Federal Communications Commission
amends its rules governing the
provision of international
telecommunications service. The
Commission amends the rule regarding
the discontinuance of international
services to reduce the notice period to
30 days. The Commission also clarifies
its rules governing the provision of
international roaming service by U.S.
Commercial Mobile Radio Service
(CMRS) carriers, changes in de jure
control of an international section 214
authorization holder, and the treatment
of asset acquisitions. The Commission
declines, however, to modify its rule
governing the provision of services by a
subsidiary of an international section
214 authorization holder. The
Commission also declines to adopt
changes to its rules governing a CMRS
carrier’s 214 authorization process.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
However, the Commission does amend
its cable landing license application
rules and application procedures to
require applicants to certify their
compliance with the Coastal Zone
Management Act (CZMA).
DATES: Effective October 25, 2007,
except for the amendments to
§§ 1.767(k)(4), 63.19(a)(1) and (a)(2), and
63.24(c) which contain information
collection requirements that have not
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The
Commission will publish a document in
the Federal Register announcing the
effective date of these rules. Written
comment by the public on the modified
information collection requirements are
due November 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Krech, Policy Division,
International Bureau at (202) 418–7443
or Cara Grayer, Policy Division,
International Bureau at (202) 418–2960.
For additional information concerning
the information collection(s) contained
in this document, contact Judith B.
Herman at 202–418–0214, or via the
Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order in IB Docket No. 04–47, FCC
07–118, adopted June 20, 2007 and
released on June 22, 2007. The full text
of the Report and Order is available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours at the
Commission’s Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
The document also may be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 202–488–5300, facsimile
202–488–5563, or via e-mail
FCC@BCPIWEB.com.
Summary of Report and Order
1. On March 4, 2004, the Commission
released a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (Amendment of
Parts 1 and 63 of the Commission’s
Rules, IB Docket No. 04–47, 69 FR
13276, March 22, 2004) seeking
comment on several potential changes
to its international section 214
authorization process and to the rules
relating to the provision of U.S.international telecommunications
services. The Commission sought
comment on whether to: (1) Amend the
procedures for discontinuance of an
international service; (2) amend the
rules to clarify that U.S.-authorized
resale carriers can resell the U.S.inbound international services of either
U.S. carriers or foreign carriers; (3)
amend the rules to allow commonly
controlled subsidiaries to provide
international service under their
parent’s section 214 authorization; (4)
revise the international section 214
requirements placed on Commercial
Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) carriers;
(5) permit a 30-day notification period
for CMRS carriers to provide
international resale service; (6) amend
§ 1.767 of the Commission’s rules
governing procedures for consideration
of applications for cable landing
licenses in order to assure compliance
with the Coastal Zone Management Act
of 1972 (CZMA); and (7) amend the
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
54364
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ownership and other rules to clarify
their intent. Ten parties filed comments
in response to the Commission’s NPRM.
Based on review of the record in this
proceeding and for the reasons set forth
in the Report and Order, the
Commission modified its rules
governing the provision of international
telecommunications service.
2. Discontinuance Issues: The
procedures for discontinuing an
international service are contained in
§ 63.19 of the Commission’s rules. This
rule sets forth different procedures for
discontinuing international service,
depending on whether a carrier is
classified as a non-dominant, dominant,
or a CMRS carrier. Prior to this Order,
the notice period for the discontinuance
of international service by nondominant carriers differed from the
notice period governing the
discontinuance of a domestic service
provided by such carriers. In this Order,
the Commission amends its rules to
reduce the notification period for a nondominant carrier’s discontinuance of
international service from 60 days to 30
days, to be more consistent with the
minimum period generally allowed
before a non-dominant carrier can
receive authority to discontinue
domestic service. In addition, the
Commission modifies its rules to require
international carriers to file a copy of
the notification with the Commission at
the same time they provide notification
to their affected customers.
3. International Roaming Issues:
International roaming allows the
customers of U.S.-licensed CMRS
carriers to use the networks of foreignlicensed wireless carriers to make calls
while traveling in foreign countries.
Roaming agreements between U.S and
foreign carriers may permit U.S.
carriers’ customers that are roaming in
other countries to call the United States
or other countries. U.S.-CMRS carriers
bill their customers for international
roaming service, and their international
roaming rates and plans are available on
the carriers’ Web sites.
As an initial matter, the Commission
finds that international roaming
involves call termination in the United
States that comes within the
Commission’s jurisdiction. The
Commission amends §§ 63.18(e)(2) and
63.23(c) of its rules to permit explicitly
all U.S.-authorized resale carriers to
provide international service by
reselling the international services of
any other authorized U.S. common
carrier or foreign carrier, or by entering
into a roaming or other arrangement
with a foreign carrier. The Commission
clarifies that a U.S. carrier’s resale
authority includes authority to provide
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
U.S. inbound or outbound service via
resale or other arrangement between the
carrier and any other authorized U.S.
carrier or foreign carrier. This rule
change eliminates uncertainty about the
ability of U.S.-authorized resale carriers
to provide U.S.-inbound service to
customers under a roaming or other
arrangement that a U.S. carrier has with
a foreign carrier, including
arrangements that allow for customer
use of a calling card issued by a U.S.
carrier.
4. Commonly-Controlled Subsidiary
Issues: Under the Commission’s rules, a
commonly-controlled subsidiary must
obtain its own international section 214
authorization, while a wholly-owned
subsidiary may provide service
pursuant to its parent company’s
authorization. In this Order, the
Commission finds that it would not be
in the public interest to amend its rules
to allow commonly-controlled
subsidiaries to provide international
service pursuant to their parent’s
international section 214 authorization.
The Commission reiterated that the
differences in ownership between a
parent and a subsidiary that it controls
but does not wholly own may raise
issues that require separate review.
5. International 214 Authorizations
for CMRS Carriers: The Commission
sought comment on whether it should
exempt CMRS carriers from the
requirement to file an application for
international section 214 authority prior
to providing service. The Commission
decided not to make any changes to the
procedures for granting international
section 214 authorizations at this time.
The Commission intends to develop a
fuller record on possible changes further
streamlining the application process
that would apply to all carriers
providing international service,
including, but not limited to, CMRS
carriers as a part of a larger review. The
Commission intends to address CMRS
carrier issues as a part of that
proceeding, and the docket will be kept
open until that time.
6. Transfer of Control: The
Commission amends § 63.24 to clarify
that a diminution of an entity’s
ownership interest in a carrier from
more than 50 percent to 50 percent or
less constitutes a transfer of control that
must be reported to the Commission.
7. Asset Acquisition: The Commission
adds a note to § 63.24 to clarify that an
asset acquisition that will not result in
a loss of service for its customers should
be treated as an assignment rather than
a discontinuance of service.
Specifically, the Commission clarifies
that when a carrier sells its customer
base, or a portion of its customer base,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to another carrier, the sale of assets will
be treated as an assignment, which
requires prior Commission approval
under § 63.24 of the rules.
8. Modification of Cable Landing
License Rules: The Coastal Zone
Management Act (CZMA) was enacted
to encourage the participation of and
cooperation among state, local, regional,
and federal government agencies that
have programs that affect the coastlines.
The statute authorizes states to develop
coastal management programs, subject
to federal approval by NOAA. A coastal
management program defines
permissible land and water use within
the state coastal zone. Under 16 U.S.C.
1456(c)(3)(A), states with federallyapproved management programs are
entitled to review such uses for
consistency with those programs any
‘‘required federal license or permit to
conduct an activity, in or outside of the
coastal zone, affecting any land or water
use or natural resource of the coastal
zone of that state.’’ In the NPRM, the
Commission sought comment on
whether to amend its rules to require
applicants for a cable landing license to
comply with the CZMA.
9. NOAA has regulatory responsibility
over the state certification process and
requirements for all applicants for
federal licenses for activities in or
outside of coastal zones under CZMA,
16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(A). NOAA’s
regulations, 15 CFR part 930, subpart D,
provide a process to determine when
federal license or permit activities are
subject to consistency review. If review
is required, the applicant must certify
that the proposed activity complies with
the enforceable policies of a state
management program, and all relevant
states must concur in the applicant’s
certification before the Federal agency
grants the license.
10. The Commission amends its cable
landing license rules to comport with
CZMA requirements to apply to
applications for a license to construct
and operate a submarine cable system or
to modify the construction of a
previously approved submarine cable
system. The Commission will not
consider the requirements of the CZMA
to apply to applications for changes of
ownership of the submarine cable
system or landing stations (transfers or
control or assignments) or other
modifications of the cable landing
license that do not effect the
construction of the submarine cable
system. The Commission therefore adds
a note to § 1.767(a) of its rules clarifying
that, in accordance with the express
requirement that a federal license
applicant ‘‘shall provide [the
certification] in the application to the
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
licensing or permitting agency,’’ all
consistency certifications required by
section 1456(c)(3)(A) must be included
in the application filed with the
Commission for a license to construct
and operate a submarine cable system or
to modify the construction of a
previously approved submarine cable
system.
11. In accordance with the
requirement that state concurrence is to
precede the grant of the cable landing
license and to prevent the construction
of any submarine cable system or cable
landing station while a coastal state is
reviewing the applicant’s consistency
certification, the Commission will not
streamline the application or take any
action on a cable landing license
application pending notification, or
documentation from the applicant, that
all required state concurrences have
been received or may be presumed. In
sum, the Commission revises § 1.767 to
clarify that any consistency
certifications required by section
1456(c)(3)(A) must be included in cable
landing license applications filed with
the Commission to construct and
operate or modify construction of a
previously approved submarine cable
system, and that construction or
modification may not commence until
all coastal states have concurred or may
be presumed to have concurred with
any required certifications included in
the cable landing application. Further,
§ 1.767(k)(4) clarifies that the submarine
cable system will not be located in any
states where the cable landing licenses
may be subject to the consistency
certification requirements of the CZMA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
12. This Report and Order contains
either new or modified information
collections subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. It will be submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review under section 3507(d)
of the PRA. OMB, the general public,
and other Federal agencies are invited to
comment on the modified information
collection requirements contained in
this proceeding. In addition, we note
that pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law No. 107–198, (see 44 U.S.C. 3506
(c)(4)), the Commission previously
sought specific comment on how the
Commission might ‘‘further reduce the
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’
13. All comments regarding the
requests for approval of the information
collection should be submitted to Judith
B. Herman, Federal Communications
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Commission, Room 1–C804, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or
via the Internet to JudithB.Herman@fcc.gov; phone 202–418–
0214.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
14. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, as amended (RFA) requires that a
Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis be
prepared for notice-and-comment rule
making proceedings, unless the agency
certifies that ‘‘the rule will not, if
promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.’’ The RFA
generally defines the term ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction.’’ In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act. A ‘‘small
business concern’’ is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
15. As stated in the Report and Order,
this proceeding was initiated as part of
the Commission’s 2002 biennial
regulatory review process. Through this
review, the Commission has sought to:
facilitate the introduction of new
services; provide customers with more
choices, innovative services, and
competitive prices; improve the
processing of authorization applications
and regulation of international services;
and lessen the regulatory burdens
placed on carriers. In this proceeding,
the Commission examined the rules
regarding the authorization of
international services under section 214
of the Act.
16. In the NPRM, the Commission
certified that the rules proposed in this
proceeding would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The
Commission stated that the proposals
would be in the public interest and
would lessen the burdens on all carriers,
both small and large, providing
international common carrier service
pursuant to section 214 of the Act. In
the Order, the Commission adopts many
of the rule changes proposed in the
NPRM. Thus, we certify that rule
changes adopted in this Order will have
no significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
17. In the Order, the Commission
amends its rules regarding the
discontinuance of international service
by aligning the international rules with
those rules for domestic service. The
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54365
Order will amend the submarine cable
landing rules to require applicants to
include information regarding an
applicant’s compliance with the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972. The
Order clarifies the rules to eliminate
confusion as to whether a CMRS carrier
requires authority to resell U.S. inbound
service of a foreign carrier for the U.S.–
CMRS carrier’s customers that are
roaming in a foreign country. The Order
requires a carrier to notify the
Commission when there is a change in
ownership to 50 percent or less. Also, a
diminution of an entity’s ownership
interest in a carrier to 50 percent or less
constitutes a transfer of control that
must be reported to the Commission.
The Order amends its rules to clarify
that an asset acquisition that will not
result in a loss of service for its
customers should be treated as an
assignment rather than a discontinuance
of service. In addition, the Report and
Order amends the rules so that when a
carrier sells its customers or a portion of
its customers to another carrier, the sale
of assets will be treated as an
assignment.
18. The rule changes adopted in this
Report and Order will benefit all
entities, both small and large. The rules
for discontinuing international service
will be consistent with the rules for
discontinuing domestic service, thereby
eliminating the disparities between
domestic and international service
rules. The Commission finds that it will
be in the public interest to eliminate the
requirement that CMRS carriers seek
authority for the resale of inbound
traffic. Rather, this authority will be
included in the carrier’s global resale
authority. This rule change will reduce
the filing requirements on CMRS
carriers, many of which are small
entities. Although the majority of
submarine cable landing license
applicants is not considered small
entities, the rule changes affecting these
applicants are nominal and will ensure
that our rules are consistent with the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972.
19. The rules adopted in the Report
and Order are administrative and will
streamline and clarify our processes.
Therefore, we find that the rules
adopted in this Order will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Ordering Clauses
20. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority contained in
sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) 11, 201–205, 211,
214, 219, 220, 303(r), 309, and 403 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
161, 201–205, 211, 214, 219, 220, 303(r),
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
54366
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
309 and 403, and sections 34–39 of the
Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C.
34–39, this report and order is hereby
adopted.
21. It is ordered that the Commission’s
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, Reference Information Center,
shall send a copy of this report and
order, including the Final Regulatory
Flexibility Act Certification, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration in accordance
with section 603(a) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
22. It is further ordered that the
Regulatory Flexibility Certification, as
required by section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and as set
forth above is adopted.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 1 and
63
Cable, Telecommunications.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
*
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR parts 1 and
63 to read as follows:
I
PART 1—PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 1
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C.
151, 154(i) , 154 (j), 155, 157, 225, 303(r) and
309.
2. Section 1.767 is amended by adding
a note to paragraph (a)(10) and by
adding new paragraph (k)(4) to read as
follows:
I
§ 1.767
Cable landing licenses.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Jkt 211001
PART 63—EXTENSION OF LINES, NEW
LINES AND DISCONTINUANCE,
REDUCTION, OUTAGE AND
IMPAIRMENT OF SERVICE BY
COMMON CARRIERS; AND GRANTS
OF RECOGNIZED PRIVATE
OPERATING AGENCY STATUS
3. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
Note to paragraph (a)(10): Applicants for
cable landing licenses may be subject to the
consistency certification requirements of the
Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C.
1456, if they propose to conduct activities, in
or outside of a coastal zone of a state with
a federally-approved management plan,
affecting any land or water use or natural
resource of that state’s coastal zone. Before
filing their applications for a license to
construct and operate a submarine cable
system or to modify the construction of a
previously approved submarine cable system,
applicants must determine whether they are
required to certify that their proposed
activities will comply with the enforceable
policies of a coastal state’s approved
management program. In order to make this
determination, applicants should consult
National Oceanic Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) regulations, 15 CFR
part 930, subpart D, and review the approved
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(4) Certifying that for applications for
a license to construct and operate a
submarine cable system or to modify the
construction of a previously approved
submarine cable system, the submarine
cable system will not be located in any
states where the cable landing licenses
may be subject to the consistency
certification requirements of the Coastal
Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1456.
*
*
*
*
*
I
(a) * * *
(10) * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
management programs of coastal states in the
vicinity of the proposed landing station to
verify that this type of application is not a
listed federal license activity requiring
review and that no state has sought or
received NOAA approval to review the
application as an unlisted activity. If it is
determined that any certification is required,
applicants shall consult the affected coastal
state(s) (or designated state agency(ies)) in
determining the contents of any required
consistency certification(s). Applicants may
also consult the Office of Ocean and Coastal
Management (OCRM) within NOAA for
guidance. The cable landing license
application filed with the Commission shall
include any consistency certification
required by section 1456(c)(3)(A) for any
affected coastal state(s). Upon documentation
from the applicant, or notification from each
affected coastal state, that the state has either
concurred, or by its inaction, is conclusively
presumed to have concurred with the
applicant’s consistency certification, the
Commission may take action on the
application.
Authority: Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 10, 11,
201–205, 214, 218, 403 and 651 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 160, 201–205,
214, 218, 403, and 571, unless otherwise
noted.
4. Section 63.18 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(2) introductory
text to read as follows:
I
§ 63.18 Contents of applications for
international common carriers.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) Global Resale Authority. If
applying for authority to resell the
international services of authorized
common carriers subject to § 63.23, the
applicant shall:
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5. Section 63.19 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) to
read as follows:
I
§ 63.19 Special procedures for
discontinuances of international services.
(a) * * *
(1) The carrier shall notify all affected
customers of the planned
discontinuance, reduction or
impairment at least 30 days prior to its
planned action. Notice shall be in
writing to each affected customer unless
the Commission authorizes in advance,
for good cause shown, another form of
notice.
(2) The carrier shall file with this
Commission a copy of the notification
on the date on which notice has been
given to all affected customers. The
filing may be made by letter (sending an
original and five copies to the Office of
the Secretary, and a copy to the Chief,
International Bureau) and shall identify
the geographic areas of the planned
discontinuance, reduction or
impairment and the authorization(s)
pursuant to which the carrier provides
service.
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Section 63.23 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 63.23 Resale-based international
common carriers.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Subject to the limitations specified
in paragraph (b) of this section and in
§ 63.17(b), the carrier may provide
service by reselling the international
services of any other authorized U.S.
common carrier or foreign carrier, or by
entering into a roaming or other
arrangement with a foreign carrier, for
the provision of international basic
switched, private line, data, television
and business services to all
international points.
Note to paragraph (c): For purposes of this
paragraph, a roaming arrangement with a
foreign carrier is defined as an arrangement
under which the subscribers of a U.S.
commercial mobile radio service provider
use the facilities of a foreign carrier with
which the subscriber has no direct preexisting service or financial relationship to
place a call from the foreign country to the
United States.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Section 63.24 is amended by adding
a note to paragraph (b) and by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
I
§ 63.24 Assignments and transfers of
control.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
Note to paragraph (b): The sale of a
customer base, or a portion of a customer
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
base, by a carrier to another carrier, is a sale
of assets and shall be treated as an
assignment, which requires prior
Commission approval under this section.
(c) Transfers of control. For purposes
of this section, a transfer of control is a
transaction in which the authorization
remains held by the same entity, but
there is a change in the entity or entities
that control the authorization holder. A
change from less than 50 percent
ownership to 50 percent or more
ownership shall always be considered a
transfer of control. A change from 50
percent or more ownership to less than
50 percent ownership shall always be
considered a transfer of control. In all
other situations, whether the interest
being transferred is controlling must be
determined on a case-by-case basis with
reference to the factors listed in Note to
paragraph (c).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–18777 Filed 9–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 71
Current Indiana Time Observance
Indiana is divided into 92 counties.
Under Federal law, 75 counties are in
the Eastern Time Zone and 17 are in the
Central Time Zone. There are six
Central Time Zone Counties in the
northwest (Lake, Porter, La Porte,
Starke, Newton, and Jasper) and eleven
in the southwest (Knox, Daviess, Martin,
Gibson, Pike, Dubois, Posey,
Vanderburgh, Warrick, Spencer, and
Perry). Neighboring states differ as to
whether they observe Eastern or Central
Time. Illinois and western Kentucky
observe Central Time, while eastern
Kentucky, Ohio, and the portion of
Michigan adjoining Indiana observe
Eastern Time.
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and
Dubois Counties (the Petitioning
Counties) and Perry County were moved
to the Central Time Zone in January
2006. (71 FR 3228). On August 18, 2006,
the Boards of Commissioners of the
Petitioning Counties filed a Joint
Petition requesting a time zone change
back to the Eastern Time Zone. In
addition, on June 1, 2007, Perry County
filed a petition requesting a time zone
change back to the Eastern Time Zone,
if the Petitioning Counties were
changed.
Statutory Requirements
[OST Docket No. 2007–28746]
RIN 2105–AD71
Standard Time Zone Boundary in
Southwest Indiana
Office of the Secretary (OST),
the Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DOT is relocating the time
zone boundary in Indiana to move
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and Dubois
Counties from the Central Time Zone to
the Eastern Time Zone. This action is
taken at the request of the Boards of
Commissioners of each of the Counties
and this change serves the convenience
of commerce, the statutory standard for
a time zone change. DOT is denying a
petition from Perry County to change its
time zone boundary. Perry County will
remain in the Central Time Zone.
DATES: The effective time and date is 2
a.m. CDT, November 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith S. Kaleta, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
indianatime@dot.gov, (202) 493–0992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Under the Standard Time Act of 1918,
as amended by the Uniform Time Act of
1966 (15 U.S.C. 260–64), the Secretary
of Transportation has authority to issue
regulations modifying the boundaries
between time zones in the United States
in order to move an area from one time
zone to another. The standard to modify
a boundary contained in the statute for
such decisions is ‘‘regard for the
convenience of commerce and the
existing junction points and division
points of common carriers engaged in
interstate or foreign commerce.’’ 15
U.S.C. 261.
DOT Procedures To Change a Time
Zone Boundary
DOT typically uses a set of procedures
to address time zone issues. Under these
procedures, DOT will generally begin a
rulemaking proceeding to change a time
zone boundary if the highest elected
officials in the area submit a petition
requesting a time zone change and
provide adequate data supporting the
proposed change. We ask that the
petition include, or be accompanied by,
detailed information supporting the
requesting party’s contention that the
requested change would serve the
convenience of commerce. The
principle for deciding whether to
change a time zone is defined very
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54367
broadly to include consideration of all
impacts of such a change on a
community. We also ask that the
supporting documentation address, at a
minimum, each of the following
questions in as much detail as possible:
1. From where do businesses in the
community get their supplies, and to
where do they ship their goods or
products?
2. From where does the community
receive television and radio broadcasts?
3. Where are the newspapers
published that serve the community?
4. From where does the community
get its bus and passenger rail services;
if there is no scheduled bus or passenger
rail service in the community, to where
must residents go to obtain these
services?
5. Where is the nearest airport; if it is
a local service airport, to what major
airport does it carry passengers?
6. What percentage of residents of the
community work outside the
community; where do these residents
work?
7. What are the major elements of the
community’s economy; is the
community’s economy improving or
declining; what Federal, State, or local
plans, if any, are there for economic
development in the community?
8. If residents leave the community
for schooling, recreation, health care, or
religious worship, what standard of time
is observed in the places where they go
for these purposes?
In addition, we consider any other
information that the elected officials
believe to be relevant to the proceeding.
We consider the effect on economic,
cultural, social, and civic activities, and
how a change in time zone would affect
businesses, communication,
transportation, and education.
2005–2006 Indiana Time Zone
Rulemaking Proceedings Involving the
Petitioning Counties and Perry County
In the summer of 2005, a new Indiana
state law adopted Daylight Saving Time
for the entire State and further provided
that the State supported the county
executives of any county that sought to
change time zones. On August 17, 2005,
DOT published a notice in the Federal
Register inviting county and local
officials in Indiana that wished to
change their current time zone to notify
DOT of their request for a change by
September 16, 2005, and to provide data
in response to the questions identified
in the previous section on DOT
Procedures to Change a Time Zone
Boundary. DOT received 19 petitions
from counties asking to be changed from
the Eastern Time Zone to the Central
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54363-54367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18777]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 63
[IB Docket No. 04-47; FCC 07-118]
Modification of the Rules and Procedures Governing the Provision
of International Telecommunications Service
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this Report and Order, the Federal Communications
Commission amends its rules governing the provision of international
telecommunications service. The Commission amends the rule regarding
the discontinuance of international services to reduce the notice
period to 30 days. The Commission also clarifies its rules governing
the provision of international roaming service by U.S. Commercial
Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) carriers, changes in de jure control of an
international section 214 authorization holder, and the treatment of
asset acquisitions. The Commission declines, however, to modify its
rule governing the provision of services by a subsidiary of an
international section 214 authorization holder. The Commission also
declines to adopt changes to its rules governing a CMRS carrier's 214
authorization process. However, the Commission does amend its cable
landing license application rules and application procedures to require
applicants to certify their compliance with the Coastal Zone Management
Act (CZMA).
DATES: Effective October 25, 2007, except for the amendments to
Sec. Sec. 1.767(k)(4), 63.19(a)(1) and (a)(2), and 63.24(c) which
contain information collection requirements that have not been approved
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The Commission will
publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective
date of these rules. Written comment by the public on the modified
information collection requirements are due November 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Krech, Policy Division,
International Bureau at (202) 418-7443 or Cara Grayer, Policy Division,
International Bureau at (202) 418-2960. For additional information
concerning the information collection(s) contained in this document,
contact Judith B. Herman at 202-418-0214, or via the Internet at
Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report
and Order in IB Docket No. 04-47, FCC 07-118, adopted June 20, 2007 and
released on June 22, 2007. The full text of the Report and Order is
available for public inspection and copying during regular business
hours at the Commission's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document also
may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-
B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202-488-5300, facsimile 202-488-
5563, or via e-mail FCC@BCPIWEB.com.
Summary of Report and Order
1. On March 4, 2004, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (Amendment of Parts 1 and 63 of the Commission's
Rules, IB Docket No. 04-47, 69 FR 13276, March 22, 2004) seeking
comment on several potential changes to its international section 214
authorization process and to the rules relating to the provision of
U.S.-international telecommunications services. The Commission sought
comment on whether to: (1) Amend the procedures for discontinuance of
an international service; (2) amend the rules to clarify that U.S.-
authorized resale carriers can resell the U.S.-inbound international
services of either U.S. carriers or foreign carriers; (3) amend the
rules to allow commonly controlled subsidiaries to provide
international service under their parent's section 214 authorization;
(4) revise the international section 214 requirements placed on
Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) carriers; (5) permit a 30-day
notification period for CMRS carriers to provide international resale
service; (6) amend Sec. 1.767 of the Commission's rules governing
procedures for consideration of applications for cable landing licenses
in order to assure compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act of
1972 (CZMA); and (7) amend the
[[Page 54364]]
ownership and other rules to clarify their intent. Ten parties filed
comments in response to the Commission's NPRM. Based on review of the
record in this proceeding and for the reasons set forth in the Report
and Order, the Commission modified its rules governing the provision of
international telecommunications service.
2. Discontinuance Issues: The procedures for discontinuing an
international service are contained in Sec. 63.19 of the Commission's
rules. This rule sets forth different procedures for discontinuing
international service, depending on whether a carrier is classified as
a non-dominant, dominant, or a CMRS carrier. Prior to this Order, the
notice period for the discontinuance of international service by non-
dominant carriers differed from the notice period governing the
discontinuance of a domestic service provided by such carriers. In this
Order, the Commission amends its rules to reduce the notification
period for a non-dominant carrier's discontinuance of international
service from 60 days to 30 days, to be more consistent with the minimum
period generally allowed before a non-dominant carrier can receive
authority to discontinue domestic service. In addition, the Commission
modifies its rules to require international carriers to file a copy of
the notification with the Commission at the same time they provide
notification to their affected customers.
3. International Roaming Issues: International roaming allows the
customers of U.S.-licensed CMRS carriers to use the networks of
foreign-licensed wireless carriers to make calls while traveling in
foreign countries. Roaming agreements between U.S and foreign carriers
may permit U.S. carriers' customers that are roaming in other countries
to call the United States or other countries. U.S.-CMRS carriers bill
their customers for international roaming service, and their
international roaming rates and plans are available on the carriers'
Web sites.
As an initial matter, the Commission finds that international
roaming involves call termination in the United States that comes
within the Commission's jurisdiction. The Commission amends Sec. Sec.
63.18(e)(2) and 63.23(c) of its rules to permit explicitly all U.S.-
authorized resale carriers to provide international service by
reselling the international services of any other authorized U.S.
common carrier or foreign carrier, or by entering into a roaming or
other arrangement with a foreign carrier. The Commission clarifies that
a U.S. carrier's resale authority includes authority to provide U.S.
inbound or outbound service via resale or other arrangement between the
carrier and any other authorized U.S. carrier or foreign carrier. This
rule change eliminates uncertainty about the ability of U.S.-authorized
resale carriers to provide U.S.-inbound service to customers under a
roaming or other arrangement that a U.S. carrier has with a foreign
carrier, including arrangements that allow for customer use of a
calling card issued by a U.S. carrier.
4. Commonly-Controlled Subsidiary Issues: Under the Commission's
rules, a commonly-controlled subsidiary must obtain its own
international section 214 authorization, while a wholly-owned
subsidiary may provide service pursuant to its parent company's
authorization. In this Order, the Commission finds that it would not be
in the public interest to amend its rules to allow commonly-controlled
subsidiaries to provide international service pursuant to their
parent's international section 214 authorization. The Commission
reiterated that the differences in ownership between a parent and a
subsidiary that it controls but does not wholly own may raise issues
that require separate review.
5. International 214 Authorizations for CMRS Carriers: The
Commission sought comment on whether it should exempt CMRS carriers
from the requirement to file an application for international section
214 authority prior to providing service. The Commission decided not to
make any changes to the procedures for granting international section
214 authorizations at this time. The Commission intends to develop a
fuller record on possible changes further streamlining the application
process that would apply to all carriers providing international
service, including, but not limited to, CMRS carriers as a part of a
larger review. The Commission intends to address CMRS carrier issues as
a part of that proceeding, and the docket will be kept open until that
time.
6. Transfer of Control: The Commission amends Sec. 63.24 to
clarify that a diminution of an entity's ownership interest in a
carrier from more than 50 percent to 50 percent or less constitutes a
transfer of control that must be reported to the Commission.
7. Asset Acquisition: The Commission adds a note to Sec. 63.24 to
clarify that an asset acquisition that will not result in a loss of
service for its customers should be treated as an assignment rather
than a discontinuance of service. Specifically, the Commission
clarifies that when a carrier sells its customer base, or a portion of
its customer base, to another carrier, the sale of assets will be
treated as an assignment, which requires prior Commission approval
under Sec. 63.24 of the rules.
8. Modification of Cable Landing License Rules: The Coastal Zone
Management Act (CZMA) was enacted to encourage the participation of and
cooperation among state, local, regional, and federal government
agencies that have programs that affect the coastlines. The statute
authorizes states to develop coastal management programs, subject to
federal approval by NOAA. A coastal management program defines
permissible land and water use within the state coastal zone. Under 16
U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(A), states with federally-approved management
programs are entitled to review such uses for consistency with those
programs any ``required federal license or permit to conduct an
activity, in or outside of the coastal zone, affecting any land or
water use or natural resource of the coastal zone of that state.'' In
the NPRM, the Commission sought comment on whether to amend its rules
to require applicants for a cable landing license to comply with the
CZMA.
9. NOAA has regulatory responsibility over the state certification
process and requirements for all applicants for federal licenses for
activities in or outside of coastal zones under CZMA, 16 U.S.C.
1456(c)(3)(A). NOAA's regulations, 15 CFR part 930, subpart D, provide
a process to determine when federal license or permit activities are
subject to consistency review. If review is required, the applicant
must certify that the proposed activity complies with the enforceable
policies of a state management program, and all relevant states must
concur in the applicant's certification before the Federal agency
grants the license.
10. The Commission amends its cable landing license rules to
comport with CZMA requirements to apply to applications for a license
to construct and operate a submarine cable system or to modify the
construction of a previously approved submarine cable system. The
Commission will not consider the requirements of the CZMA to apply to
applications for changes of ownership of the submarine cable system or
landing stations (transfers or control or assignments) or other
modifications of the cable landing license that do not effect the
construction of the submarine cable system. The Commission therefore
adds a note to Sec. 1.767(a) of its rules clarifying that, in
accordance with the express requirement that a federal license
applicant ``shall provide [the certification] in the application to the
[[Page 54365]]
licensing or permitting agency,'' all consistency certifications
required by section 1456(c)(3)(A) must be included in the application
filed with the Commission for a license to construct and operate a
submarine cable system or to modify the construction of a previously
approved submarine cable system.
11. In accordance with the requirement that state concurrence is to
precede the grant of the cable landing license and to prevent the
construction of any submarine cable system or cable landing station
while a coastal state is reviewing the applicant's consistency
certification, the Commission will not streamline the application or
take any action on a cable landing license application pending
notification, or documentation from the applicant, that all required
state concurrences have been received or may be presumed. In sum, the
Commission revises Sec. 1.767 to clarify that any consistency
certifications required by section 1456(c)(3)(A) must be included in
cable landing license applications filed with the Commission to
construct and operate or modify construction of a previously approved
submarine cable system, and that construction or modification may not
commence until all coastal states have concurred or may be presumed to
have concurred with any required certifications included in the cable
landing application. Further, Sec. 1.767(k)(4) clarifies that the
submarine cable system will not be located in any states where the
cable landing licenses may be subject to the consistency certification
requirements of the CZMA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
12. This Report and Order contains either new or modified
information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 3507(d) of the
PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to
comment on the modified information collection requirements contained
in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-198, (see 44
U.S.C. 3506 (c)(4)), the Commission previously sought specific comment
on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection
burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.''
13. All comments regarding the requests for approval of the
information collection should be submitted to Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1-C804, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov;
phone 202-418-0214.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
14. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA)
requires that a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis be prepared for
notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies
that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally
defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the
terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small
governmental jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business''
has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the
Small Business Act. A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of
operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
15. As stated in the Report and Order, this proceeding was
initiated as part of the Commission's 2002 biennial regulatory review
process. Through this review, the Commission has sought to: facilitate
the introduction of new services; provide customers with more choices,
innovative services, and competitive prices; improve the processing of
authorization applications and regulation of international services;
and lessen the regulatory burdens placed on carriers. In this
proceeding, the Commission examined the rules regarding the
authorization of international services under section 214 of the Act.
16. In the NPRM, the Commission certified that the rules proposed
in this proceeding would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The Commission stated that the
proposals would be in the public interest and would lessen the burdens
on all carriers, both small and large, providing international common
carrier service pursuant to section 214 of the Act. In the Order, the
Commission adopts many of the rule changes proposed in the NPRM. Thus,
we certify that rule changes adopted in this Order will have no
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
17. In the Order, the Commission amends its rules regarding the
discontinuance of international service by aligning the international
rules with those rules for domestic service. The Order will amend the
submarine cable landing rules to require applicants to include
information regarding an applicant's compliance with the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972. The Order clarifies the rules to eliminate
confusion as to whether a CMRS carrier requires authority to resell
U.S. inbound service of a foreign carrier for the U.S.-CMRS carrier's
customers that are roaming in a foreign country. The Order requires a
carrier to notify the Commission when there is a change in ownership to
50 percent or less. Also, a diminution of an entity's ownership
interest in a carrier to 50 percent or less constitutes a transfer of
control that must be reported to the Commission. The Order amends its
rules to clarify that an asset acquisition that will not result in a
loss of service for its customers should be treated as an assignment
rather than a discontinuance of service. In addition, the Report and
Order amends the rules so that when a carrier sells its customers or a
portion of its customers to another carrier, the sale of assets will be
treated as an assignment.
18. The rule changes adopted in this Report and Order will benefit
all entities, both small and large. The rules for discontinuing
international service will be consistent with the rules for
discontinuing domestic service, thereby eliminating the disparities
between domestic and international service rules. The Commission finds
that it will be in the public interest to eliminate the requirement
that CMRS carriers seek authority for the resale of inbound traffic.
Rather, this authority will be included in the carrier's global resale
authority. This rule change will reduce the filing requirements on CMRS
carriers, many of which are small entities. Although the majority of
submarine cable landing license applicants is not considered small
entities, the rule changes affecting these applicants are nominal and
will ensure that our rules are consistent with the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972.
19. The rules adopted in the Report and Order are administrative
and will streamline and clarify our processes. Therefore, we find that
the rules adopted in this Order will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Ordering Clauses
20. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to the authority
contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) 11, 201-205, 211, 214, 219, 220,
303(r), 309, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 161, 201-205, 211, 214, 219, 220, 303(r),
[[Page 54366]]
309 and 403, and sections 34-39 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47
U.S.C. 34-39, this report and order is hereby adopted.
21. It is ordered that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this
report and order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration in accordance with section 603(a) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
22. It is further ordered that the Regulatory Flexibility
Certification, as required by section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act and as set forth above is adopted.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 1 and 63
Cable, Telecommunications.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Final Rules
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR parts 1 and 63 to read as follows:
PART 1--PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i) , 154
(j), 155, 157, 225, 303(r) and 309.
0
2. Section 1.767 is amended by adding a note to paragraph (a)(10) and
by adding new paragraph (k)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.767 Cable landing licenses.
(a) * * *
(10) * * *
Note to paragraph (a)(10): Applicants for cable landing licenses
may be subject to the consistency certification requirements of the
Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1456, if they propose to
conduct activities, in or outside of a coastal zone of a state with
a federally-approved management plan, affecting any land or water
use or natural resource of that state's coastal zone. Before filing
their applications for a license to construct and operate a
submarine cable system or to modify the construction of a previously
approved submarine cable system, applicants must determine whether
they are required to certify that their proposed activities will
comply with the enforceable policies of a coastal state's approved
management program. In order to make this determination, applicants
should consult National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
regulations, 15 CFR part 930, subpart D, and review the approved
management programs of coastal states in the vicinity of the
proposed landing station to verify that this type of application is
not a listed federal license activity requiring review and that no
state has sought or received NOAA approval to review the application
as an unlisted activity. If it is determined that any certification
is required, applicants shall consult the affected coastal state(s)
(or designated state agency(ies)) in determining the contents of any
required consistency certification(s). Applicants may also consult
the Office of Ocean and Coastal Management (OCRM) within NOAA for
guidance. The cable landing license application filed with the
Commission shall include any consistency certification required by
section 1456(c)(3)(A) for any affected coastal state(s). Upon
documentation from the applicant, or notification from each affected
coastal state, that the state has either concurred, or by its
inaction, is conclusively presumed to have concurred with the
applicant's consistency certification, the Commission may take
action on the application.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(4) Certifying that for applications for a license to construct and
operate a submarine cable system or to modify the construction of a
previously approved submarine cable system, the submarine cable system
will not be located in any states where the cable landing licenses may
be subject to the consistency certification requirements of the Coastal
Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1456.
* * * * *
PART 63--EXTENSION OF LINES, NEW LINES AND DISCONTINUANCE,
REDUCTION, OUTAGE AND IMPAIRMENT OF SERVICE BY COMMON CARRIERS; AND
GRANTS OF RECOGNIZED PRIVATE OPERATING AGENCY STATUS
0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 10, 11, 201-205, 214, 218,
403 and 651 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
151, 154(i), 154(j), 160, 201-205, 214, 218, 403, and 571, unless
otherwise noted.
0
4. Section 63.18 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(2) introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 63.18 Contents of applications for international common
carriers.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) Global Resale Authority. If applying for authority to resell
the international services of authorized common carriers subject to
Sec. 63.23, the applicant shall:
* * * * *
0
5. Section 63.19 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.19 Special procedures for discontinuances of international
services.
(a) * * *
(1) The carrier shall notify all affected customers of the planned
discontinuance, reduction or impairment at least 30 days prior to its
planned action. Notice shall be in writing to each affected customer
unless the Commission authorizes in advance, for good cause shown,
another form of notice.
(2) The carrier shall file with this Commission a copy of the
notification on the date on which notice has been given to all affected
customers. The filing may be made by letter (sending an original and
five copies to the Office of the Secretary, and a copy to the Chief,
International Bureau) and shall identify the geographic areas of the
planned discontinuance, reduction or impairment and the
authorization(s) pursuant to which the carrier provides service.
* * * * *
0
6. Section 63.23 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.23 Resale-based international common carriers.
* * * * *
(c) Subject to the limitations specified in paragraph (b) of this
section and in Sec. 63.17(b), the carrier may provide service by
reselling the international services of any other authorized U.S.
common carrier or foreign carrier, or by entering into a roaming or
other arrangement with a foreign carrier, for the provision of
international basic switched, private line, data, television and
business services to all international points.
Note to paragraph (c): For purposes of this paragraph, a roaming
arrangement with a foreign carrier is defined as an arrangement
under which the subscribers of a U.S. commercial mobile radio
service provider use the facilities of a foreign carrier with which
the subscriber has no direct pre-existing service or financial
relationship to place a call from the foreign country to the United
States.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 63.24 is amended by adding a note to paragraph (b) and by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.24 Assignments and transfers of control.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Note to paragraph (b): The sale of a customer base, or a portion
of a customer
[[Page 54367]]
base, by a carrier to another carrier, is a sale of assets and shall
be treated as an assignment, which requires prior Commission
approval under this section.
(c) Transfers of control. For purposes of this section, a transfer
of control is a transaction in which the authorization remains held by
the same entity, but there is a change in the entity or entities that
control the authorization holder. A change from less than 50 percent
ownership to 50 percent or more ownership shall always be considered a
transfer of control. A change from 50 percent or more ownership to less
than 50 percent ownership shall always be considered a transfer of
control. In all other situations, whether the interest being
transferred is controlling must be determined on a case-by-case basis
with reference to the factors listed in Note to paragraph (c).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-18777 Filed 9-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P