Standard Time Zone Boundary in Southwest Indiana, 54367-54377 [07-4721]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
base, by a carrier to another carrier, is a sale
of assets and shall be treated as an
assignment, which requires prior
Commission approval under this section.
(c) Transfers of control. For purposes
of this section, a transfer of control is a
transaction in which the authorization
remains held by the same entity, but
there is a change in the entity or entities
that control the authorization holder. A
change from less than 50 percent
ownership to 50 percent or more
ownership shall always be considered a
transfer of control. A change from 50
percent or more ownership to less than
50 percent ownership shall always be
considered a transfer of control. In all
other situations, whether the interest
being transferred is controlling must be
determined on a case-by-case basis with
reference to the factors listed in Note to
paragraph (c).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–18777 Filed 9–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 71
Current Indiana Time Observance
Indiana is divided into 92 counties.
Under Federal law, 75 counties are in
the Eastern Time Zone and 17 are in the
Central Time Zone. There are six
Central Time Zone Counties in the
northwest (Lake, Porter, La Porte,
Starke, Newton, and Jasper) and eleven
in the southwest (Knox, Daviess, Martin,
Gibson, Pike, Dubois, Posey,
Vanderburgh, Warrick, Spencer, and
Perry). Neighboring states differ as to
whether they observe Eastern or Central
Time. Illinois and western Kentucky
observe Central Time, while eastern
Kentucky, Ohio, and the portion of
Michigan adjoining Indiana observe
Eastern Time.
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and
Dubois Counties (the Petitioning
Counties) and Perry County were moved
to the Central Time Zone in January
2006. (71 FR 3228). On August 18, 2006,
the Boards of Commissioners of the
Petitioning Counties filed a Joint
Petition requesting a time zone change
back to the Eastern Time Zone. In
addition, on June 1, 2007, Perry County
filed a petition requesting a time zone
change back to the Eastern Time Zone,
if the Petitioning Counties were
changed.
Statutory Requirements
[OST Docket No. 2007–28746]
RIN 2105–AD71
Standard Time Zone Boundary in
Southwest Indiana
Office of the Secretary (OST),
the Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DOT is relocating the time
zone boundary in Indiana to move
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and Dubois
Counties from the Central Time Zone to
the Eastern Time Zone. This action is
taken at the request of the Boards of
Commissioners of each of the Counties
and this change serves the convenience
of commerce, the statutory standard for
a time zone change. DOT is denying a
petition from Perry County to change its
time zone boundary. Perry County will
remain in the Central Time Zone.
DATES: The effective time and date is 2
a.m. CDT, November 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith S. Kaleta, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
indianatime@dot.gov, (202) 493–0992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Under the Standard Time Act of 1918,
as amended by the Uniform Time Act of
1966 (15 U.S.C. 260–64), the Secretary
of Transportation has authority to issue
regulations modifying the boundaries
between time zones in the United States
in order to move an area from one time
zone to another. The standard to modify
a boundary contained in the statute for
such decisions is ‘‘regard for the
convenience of commerce and the
existing junction points and division
points of common carriers engaged in
interstate or foreign commerce.’’ 15
U.S.C. 261.
DOT Procedures To Change a Time
Zone Boundary
DOT typically uses a set of procedures
to address time zone issues. Under these
procedures, DOT will generally begin a
rulemaking proceeding to change a time
zone boundary if the highest elected
officials in the area submit a petition
requesting a time zone change and
provide adequate data supporting the
proposed change. We ask that the
petition include, or be accompanied by,
detailed information supporting the
requesting party’s contention that the
requested change would serve the
convenience of commerce. The
principle for deciding whether to
change a time zone is defined very
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54367
broadly to include consideration of all
impacts of such a change on a
community. We also ask that the
supporting documentation address, at a
minimum, each of the following
questions in as much detail as possible:
1. From where do businesses in the
community get their supplies, and to
where do they ship their goods or
products?
2. From where does the community
receive television and radio broadcasts?
3. Where are the newspapers
published that serve the community?
4. From where does the community
get its bus and passenger rail services;
if there is no scheduled bus or passenger
rail service in the community, to where
must residents go to obtain these
services?
5. Where is the nearest airport; if it is
a local service airport, to what major
airport does it carry passengers?
6. What percentage of residents of the
community work outside the
community; where do these residents
work?
7. What are the major elements of the
community’s economy; is the
community’s economy improving or
declining; what Federal, State, or local
plans, if any, are there for economic
development in the community?
8. If residents leave the community
for schooling, recreation, health care, or
religious worship, what standard of time
is observed in the places where they go
for these purposes?
In addition, we consider any other
information that the elected officials
believe to be relevant to the proceeding.
We consider the effect on economic,
cultural, social, and civic activities, and
how a change in time zone would affect
businesses, communication,
transportation, and education.
2005–2006 Indiana Time Zone
Rulemaking Proceedings Involving the
Petitioning Counties and Perry County
In the summer of 2005, a new Indiana
state law adopted Daylight Saving Time
for the entire State and further provided
that the State supported the county
executives of any county that sought to
change time zones. On August 17, 2005,
DOT published a notice in the Federal
Register inviting county and local
officials in Indiana that wished to
change their current time zone to notify
DOT of their request for a change by
September 16, 2005, and to provide data
in response to the questions identified
in the previous section on DOT
Procedures to Change a Time Zone
Boundary. DOT received 19 petitions
from counties asking to be changed from
the Eastern Time Zone to the Central
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
54368
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Time Zone, including the Petitioning
Counties and Perry County.
In 2005, the Petitioning Counties
submitted their petitions individually.
In these petitions, they enumerated
reasons for a move to the Central Time
Zone based in large part on comments
made during open, local public
meetings in their respective counties.
The Daviess County petition
emphasized Evansville (in the Central
Time Zone) as the place with the closest
airport and the place where its residents
shop, conduct business, and receive
television broadcasts, with ‘‘numerous
citizens’’ employed in Gibson County
(in the Central Time Zone). The Dubois
County petition pointed out that while
many services are obtained withincounty, the decision to move to the
Central Time Zone was supported by
‘‘60 to 70% of the general public, by
representatives of three local school
districts, and by approximately 50% of
local business and industry.’’ The Knox
County petition stated that many of its
residents work in the Central Time
Zone, creating ‘‘time zone issues during
substantial portions of the year’’ and
those residents who leave for schooling,
recreation, healthcare and religious
worship go to areas in the Central Time
Zone. The Martin County petition stated
that ‘‘inclusion in the Central Time
Zone is preferred by a majority of those
responding,’’ that 40% of its residents
work outside of the County (mainly in
the Central Time Zone), and that the
primary providers of goods and
recipients of products to and from the
County are already located in or are
petitioning to be in the Central Time
Zone. The Pike County petition cited
television and radio broadcasting, the
interests of its mining industry and an
increasing number of employees
commuting to counties in the Central
Time Zone. The Perry County petition
provided detailed information to
illustrate how a change to the Central
Time Zone would serve the convenience
of commerce. It discussed how the
television broadcasts, newspapers, and
work patterns favor Perry County being
located in the Central Time Zone.
Based on these petitions and
comments that were submitted to the
docket and made at the public hearings,
as well as an analysis of Indiana
economic, workforce, transportation,
and education regions, and media/
commerce data, DOT concluded that the
Petitioning Counties and Perry County
have stronger ties to each other and to
other counties to their south in the
Central Time Zone than to the counties
on their northern and eastern borders in
the Eastern Time Zone. DOT, therefore,
granted the petitions and changed the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
time zone boundaries for the Petitioning
Counties and Perry County from the
Eastern Time Zone to the Central Time
Zone. The change to the Central Time
Zone became effective on April 2, 2006.
The Petitioning Counties Joint Petition
Only a few months after the
Petitioning Counties began to observe
Central Time, on August 18, 2006, the
Boards of Commissioners of the
Petitioning Counties jointly submitted a
new petition (Joint Petition) in which
they enumerated the reasons that the
Petitioning Counties, as a unit, should
be changed back to the Eastern Time
Zone. As compared to the 2005 petitions
from the Petitioning Counties, the Joint
Petition included more detailed
information in answer to the questions
DOT considers in making time zone
determinations as well as exhibits in
support of these answers.
The Joint Petition requested a change
contrary to the Petitioning Counties’
positions in their 2005 individual
petitions. The Joint Petition claimed the
2005 petitions ‘‘were incomplete and
conclusory, and the information they
contained was limited and largely based
on opinion and not backed by
substantial and verifiable evidence.’’
The Joint Petition stated that, since the
January 2006 ruling, there has been ‘‘a
groundswell of support for returning to
the Eastern Time Zone, which has been
a product of residents and businesses
having been inconvenienced in ways
that they could not have fully
anticipated until the switch occurred.’’
Accordingly, the Joint Petition claimed
‘‘to contain more extensive and
thorough research on this issue.’’
The Joint Petition was accompanied
by letters from Indiana Governor
Daniels, the Indiana Economic
Development Corporation, and the
Indiana Department of Workforce
Development. The Governor wrote in
support of the Joint Petition, stating that
putting more of the State on the same
time zone will provide clarity on the
time questions and advance economic
growth. The two Indiana organizations
addressed regional connectivity. They
noted that they established their
respective State regions based on their
ability to deliver services. They did not
establish regions based on time zones or
‘‘convenience of commerce.’’
After reviewing the Joint Petition and
its accompanying exhibits and letters of
support, on September 28, 2006, DOT
sent a letter to the Petitioning Counties
requesting that certain procedural
concerns be addressed. Specifically,
DOT requested the submission of
amended signature pages for each
county, certifying that the request was
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the result of official action by the Board
of County Commissioners, the vote of
the Board members concerning the
submission of the Joint Petition, the date
of the vote, and the signature for each
Board member. The Petitioning
Counties complied with this request on
November 13, 2006 (First Supplemental
Response).
On November 14, 2006, the DOT sent
a second letter seeking clarification and
additional information from the
Petitioning Counties before making any
determination on whether to propose a
time zone boundary change for the
Petitioning Counties. In turn, on
December 6, 2006, the Petitioning
Counties submitted a supplemental
response and appendix (Second
Supplemental Response) to DOT’s
request for this additional substantive
information. In response to an
additional request from DOT, on May
29, 2007, the Petitioning Counties sent
another letter accompanied by
numerous exhibits (Third Supplemental
Response).
2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Concerning the Petitioning Counties
Based on the Joint Petition and the
three Supplemental Responses, on July
19, 2007, DOT published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal
Register finding that the Petitioning
Counties provided enough information
to justify proposing to change their
boundary from the Central Time Zone to
the Eastern Time Zone. The Petitioning
Counties addressed all of the factors that
DOT considers in these proceedings.
The Petitioning Counties sufficiently
justified proposing a change to the
Eastern Time Zone based on
information submitted concerning
community imports and exports, bus
service, the community’s economy and
economic development, schooling,
recreation, and regional connections.
With regard to community imports and
exports, the Petitioning Counties
submitted sufficient information to
show that many businesses and
industries located in the Petitioning
Counties have substantial business
connections in the Eastern Time Zone.
In addition, the Petitioning Counties
submitted sufficient information to
show that the convenience of commerce
would better be served if businesses did
not have to adjust for time zone
differences. With regard to bus service,
the Petitioning Counties provided
information on the broader bus service
available in locations in the Eastern
Time Zone. The Petitioning Counties
provided sufficient information to
justify proposing a change back to the
Eastern Time Zone under the
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
community’s economy/economic
development and regional connections
factors based upon a proposed extension
of Interstate 69 (I–69) through central
and southwestern Indiana and the
economic impact of the Naval Surface
Warfare Center in Crane (NSWC Crane).
The Petitioning Counties pointed out
that the expansion of I–69 would
provide more economical and efficient
access to Indianapolis because traffic
will be able to flow north from
southwest Indiana to the larger network
of highways that go through
Indianapolis. The Petitioning Counties
submitted sufficient information
concerning the recreation aspect of the
convenience of commerce standard
based on sporting activities and area
attractions. The Petitioning Counties
also submitted sufficient information
concerning the education aspect of the
convenience of commerce standard to
justify proposing to change the time
zone boundary based on after school
activities and higher education.
On the other hand, DOT found that
the Petitioning Counties did not submit
sufficient information with regard to
several other factors, including worker
commuting patterns, television/radio
broadcasting, newspapers, airports/
airline services. In addition, the
Petitioning Counties did not submit
sufficient information concerning the
religious observance or health care
aspect of the convenience of commerce
standard to justify proposing to change
the time zone boundary. Nevertheless,
overall, the Petitioning Counties made a
sufficient case that changing back to the
Eastern Time Zone would serve the
convenience of commerce.
Comments to the Docket—An Overview
There were over 3500 entries to the
docket in this proceeding concerning
both the Petitioning Counties and Perry
County. The vast majority of the
comments were submitted either in emails, letters, or information
submissions to DOT’s Docket
Management System. Approximately
225 persons left a telephone message
for, or talked with, the contact person
noted in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. A list of these persons is
included in the docket. DOT notes that
comments submitted to the prior time
zone proceeding docket, OST–2005–
22114, after the issuance of DOT’s July
2006 final rule but before the July 2007
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, were
transferred to this docket and
considered before issuing this final rule.
Comments were made by the
residents of the Petitioning Counties
and Perry County, as well as other
counties in Indiana, including
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Lawrence, Marion, Monroe, Orange,
Owen, and Spencer Counties. Although
this proceeding is only to address
whether the time zone boundary should
be changed for the Petitioning Counties
and Perry County, the commenters
suggested a wide variety of approaches
to establishing time zone boundaries in
Indiana, including moving their county
to the Eastern Time Zone, keeping their
county in the Central Time Zone,
placing all of the State in the Eastern
Time Zone, and placing all of the State
in the Central Time Zone. Some said
that they did not care whether it was the
Central Time Zone or the Eastern Time
Zone, they just wanted the State to be
in the same time zone. A few
commenters asked DOT to give Indiana
a time zone and then ‘‘stay in it.’’ Others
said that shifting time zones made
things more confusing.
Comments were submitted by elected
officials. Governor Daniels, State
Representative Crooks, the Martin
County Commissioners (jointly), Martin
County Commissioner Boyd in his
individual capacity, Pike County
Commissioner Flint, Martin County
Council Member Gee, and City of Jasper
Mayor Schmitt and Jasper’s seven
council members submitted comments
supporting the Eastern Time Zone.
Santa Claus Town Councilman Burke
submitted a comment in favor of the
Central Time Zone for the Petitioning
Counties.
Comments were filed by individuals
expressing their personal interests and
preferences as well as their views on
how a time zone change would be for
the convenience of commerce. Some
commenters made the choice of time
zone reluctantly. The Martin County
Board of Commissioners, for example,
noted that they favored the entire State
to be in the same time zone, but
preferred the Eastern Time Zone as an
alternative. This same sentiment was
echoed by one Daviess County
businessman who stated, ‘‘While I
personally feel the entire state should be
on the Central Time Zone due to our
geographic location in the nation, we as
a company would be better served to be
in sync with the rest of the state. I
thereby grudgingly request that Daviess
be moved back to the Eastern Time
Zone.’’ But as one commenter observed,
‘‘we all have to see by now that there
are benefits to both time zones.’’
Most commenters identified
themselves, although some comments
were submitted anonymously. Several
individuals submitted multiple
comments, usually providing
commentary on information submitted
by others. Some noted their affiliation as
concerned parents and grandparents,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54369
interested family members, and
volunteers.
Comments were also submitted by a
variety of business interests including a
chamber of commerce. Cabinet and
furniture manufacturers, banks, natural
gas and electric companies, trucking
companies, real estate offices, a
university professor, lawyers, and grain
and livestock farmers commented.
Health care and insurance providers,
construction companies, a sawmill and
logging operator, information
technology and metal companies, and
small retail businesses also commented.
Some comments included multiple
signatures or multiple commenters. For
example, with his letter, Representative
Crooks submitted not only the results of
his 2007 legislative survey, but the
approximately 2500 actual responses
that included comments on the time
zone issue. Representative Crooks
concluded by requesting that DOT
return the Petitioning Counties to the
Eastern Time Zone. In addition, the
creator of advertisements and a Web site
for DuboisCounty4CentralTime.com
submitted approximately 500 comments
on the time zone issue. Each of the
comments included the commenter’s
name, e-mail address, business
affiliation (if applicable), time zone
preference, and additional comments.
While there were some comments in
support of the Eastern Time Zone, as
noted by the submitter, ‘‘the resounding
support from business and the public is
for central time.’’
DOT has recognized that time zone
changes can be disruptive to a
community and very divisive. Some
commenters accused others of providing
‘‘half truths and misleading
information.’’ However, the lengths to
which some would go to support a time
zone change in their favor became
apparent in the filing of two comments,
one from the town of Ireland and the
other from St. Raphael Catholic Church,
both located in Dubois County and in
support of the Central Time Zone. The
former included the names of 114
persons, the latter included 320 names,
and neither included signatures. DOT
was advised by the pastor of St.
Raphael, the president of the St.
Raphael’s parish council, and
individuals on the lists that both lists
were fraudulently submitted and did
not represent the views of the persons
on the list.
The primary reasons given by those in
favor of the Central Time Zone include
the benefit to commerce and increasing
availability for communication with
customers on the West coast; geographic
location of the State, with closer ties to
Evansville, IN, and Owensboro, KY,
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
54370
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
compared to Indianapolis and the East
coast; safety of school children; and
employment-related reasons such as
wanting to live in and work in counties
in the same time zone. Primary reasons
given by those in favor of the Eastern
Time Zone include commerce and the
quality of life. With regard to commerce,
commenters preferred the Eastern Time
Zone because Indianapolis, the state
capital, and the majority of the State are
on the Eastern Time Zone, and the
convenience of commerce would be
better served if businesses did not have
to adjust for time zone differences. With
regard to the quality of life, commenters
said it would be improved by having
more daylight in the evening to spend
time with the family or outdoors and
because parents would have fewer
problems with their children’s after
school care and sporting events.
DOT notes that several individuals
sent multiple submissions to the docket,
questioning information and data that
were provided by the Petitioning
Counties. DOT recognized that the
Petitioning Counties had submitted
information that needed to be clarified
or corrected. DOT raised these concerns
in several letters to the Petitioning
Counties and, as a result, new
information was submitted by the
Petitioning Counties to DOT. DOT
wanted to ensure that the data we rely
upon are correct. We note, however, that
the clarification of particular facts may
not be dispositive to DOT’s
determination that a time zone change
would serve the convenience of
commerce standard. Therefore, in this
final rule, DOT broadly discusses the
comments submitted as they relate to
the convenience of commerce standard,
without necessarily addressing specific
factual issues raised by these comments.
Comments on Safety of the Children,
Voting, and Personal Preferences
A substantial number of the
commenters repeatedly raised safety of
the children, voting, and their personal
preferences. Commenters who said they
preferred staying in the Central Time
Zone relied upon concerns about the
safety of the children. On the other
hand, both opponents and proponents
of time zone changes repeatedly noted
that they were ‘‘voting’’ for their time
zone preference.
With regard to the safety of the
children, some concerned parents
commented that, for safety reasons, their
children should not have to be standing
at the bus stop on rural roads when it
is still dark outside and, therefore, urged
DOT to deny the requests to move to the
Eastern Time Zone. Other concerned
parents stated they preferred that their
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
children have an extra hour of daylight
at the end of the day to allow them to
spend more time outdoors to get
exercise and, therefore, preferred the
Eastern Time Zone.
Safety is the number one priority of
the DOT and we are committed to
improving safety of school children.
However, as DOT noted in the January
2006 final rule, ‘‘Laws exist to protect
children getting on and off school buses.
If a bus stop is located in a dangerous
place, the Department continues to
encourage individuals and local
communities to talk with the school
office or transportation director about
changing the location.’’
With regard to voting for personal
preferences, a significant number of
comments to the docket were just a line
or two stating, ‘‘I vote to keep the
Petitioning Counties in the Central Time
Zone,’’ or ‘‘I vote for the Eastern Time
Zone,’’ or ‘‘My vote is for the same time
zone for the entire State of Indiana,’’ or
‘‘My husband and I vote for Eastern
Time.’’ Many called for a public
referendum on the issue.
DOT’s decision whether to change the
time zone boundary is not based on the
number of persons supporting a
particular time zone. Rather, as noted
above, Congress adopted the statutory
standard for decisions to move an area
from one time zone to another: ‘‘regard
for the convenience of commerce and
the existing junction points and division
points of common carriers engaged in
interstate or foreign commerce’’ and the
information provided by commenters
helps us make this decision. This
standard is defined very broadly by
DOT to include consideration of all the
impacts upon a community of a change
in its time zone. It is DOT’s
responsibility to consider requests for
changes in time zone boundaries in light
of the statutory standard, bearing in
mind the need to address the effect on
economic, cultural, social, and civic
activities within a county and between
neighboring counties in making
decisions. The views or preferences of
citizens, without regard for the
convenience of commerce, are not
sufficient to support a time zone change.
Furthermore, with regard to comments
requesting that DOT move the entire
State to the same time zone, DOT does
not have a statewide proposal before it
nor has the Indiana legislature endorsed
such an approach. It is, therefore,
beyond the scope of this proceeding to
consider such a significant change to the
State’s time zone boundaries.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments Addressing the Request of
the Petitioning Counties and the
Convenience of Commerce Standard
In addition to the general comments
received on the proposed time zone
change for the Petitioning Counties,
DOT also received specific comments
relating to the questions DOT considers
when determining whether to change a
time zone boundary. These comments
are summarized below and were
considered by DOT in determining the
appropriate time zone for the
Petitioning Counties.
Community Imports and Exports
Large and small businesses
commented in favor of both the Central
and the Eastern Time Zone depending
on the location of their suppliers and
customers. However, those favoring the
Eastern Time Zone also referred to lost
business implications due to the
unavailability of contacts at the
beginning and end of the day and
during lunchtime. For example, the
Martin County Board of Commissioners
noted that both the Martin County
government and local businesses lost
two hours a day. They stated, ‘‘There is
a never-ending confusion with vendors
and out of the area contacts about the
time to contact parties.’’
In addition, one small business from
Knox County commented that the
struggles of time zone differences with
customers and suppliers make it even
more difficult to compete in a ‘‘big
business world’’ and applauded the
efforts of the Petitioning Counties to
work together to move back to the
Eastern Time Zone. Another small
business from Dubois County noted that
the number of missed calls
‘‘skyrocketed’’ with the change to the
Central Time Zone. Other small retailers
preferred the Eastern Time Zone for the
additional daylight at the end of the day
for shoppers. As for larger organizations,
the Commanding Officer of the Naval
Service Warfare Center, Crane, (NSWC
Crane) and Officer-in-Charge, Naval
Support Activity, Crane, (NSA Crane)
described a negative impact of the
Central Time Zone on productivity.
Some individuals supporting the
Central Time Zone questioned what
they referred to as the ‘‘supposed four
hour difference’’ every business day and
stated that in a global economy,
businesses regularly ‘‘deal with it.’’ In
addition, a few commenters questioned
whether the Central Time Zone resulted
in a negative impact on the productivity
at NSWC Crane and submitted some
newspaper articles that highlight
contracts awarded across time zones.
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Television and Radio Broadcasts
With regard to television and radio
broadcasts, the President of
DCBroadcasting, a media company
operating a community TV station and
several radio stations in Dubois County
and adjoining counties, noted that the
company operated in both time the
Central and Eastern Time Zones. The
only reason he gave for supporting the
Eastern Time Zone was that the Jasper,
Huntingburg, and Ferdinand Chambers
of Commerce, all in Dubois County,
supported the Eastern Time Zone.
Some individual commenters favoring
the Central Time Zone noted that the
majority of the television and radio
signals received by the Petitioning
Counties are from Evansville. One
individual from Knox County expressed
concern about a change back to the
Eastern Time Zone because Knox
County is ‘‘tornado alley’’ and radio
stations broadcasting reports from the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration are from the Central
Time Zone. Another Central Time Zone
supporter noted that Dubois County
residents receive weather watches and
warnings from cities in the Central Time
Zone.
He also claimed that the time zone
difference between the installation and
the airport has resulted in lost
productivity. In addition, the Martin
County Board of Commissioners noted
that ‘‘the greatest majority of air
passengers utilize the major airports at
Indianapolis and Louisville.’’ With a
time difference, they explained that
travelers would need to leave Martin
County by 2:30 or 3 a.m. to make a 7
a.m. flight or travel to the airport the
night before and incur additional
expenses.
A Central Time Zone supporter
attached an article from the Evansville
Courier and Press detailing the
upcoming daily flights from Evansville
to Indianapolis. This commenter
suggested that persons could easily fly
out of Evansville and connect in
Indianapolis on their way to a final
destination.
Bus and Passenger Rail Service
Commenters generally noted that
residents are not regular bus or rail
passengers and that this question was
irrelevant to this proceeding. For
example, the Martin County Board of
Commissioners noted in their comments
to the docket that there is no passenger
rail traffic in Southwest Indiana and an
anonymous commenter said the number
of persons who use these services is
‘‘miniscule.’’ On the other hand, an
individual from Knox County noted that
the two closest passenger rail stations
are two cities in Illinois in the Central
Time Zone.
Worker Commuting Patterns
The majority of workers in the
Petitioning Counties live and work in
their home counties and the commuters
do not have a large impact on the
overall workforce in most of the
Petitioning Counties. In Martin County,
however, commuters make up 46.9% of
the Martin County workforce. In some
organizations, the number of employees
from another county may even be
greater. For example, NSWC Crane’s
Commanding Officer and Officer-inCharge, NSA, Crane, provided a list of
personnel and their home counties. He
noted that 93% of NSWC Crane’s 2643
employees and 65% of NSA Crane’s 145
employees live in the Eastern Time
Zone. In addition, his data showed that
there are 1494 support service contract
personnel and he surmised that they
also lived predominantly in the Eastern
Time Zone.
Commenters from Martin County
favoring the Central Time Zone
expressed concern about a focus on
worker commuting patterns and said
that the time zone boundary for Martin
County should focus on preferences of
the residents of Martin County. For
example, one commenter stated that the
counties in the Eastern Time Zone
surrounding Martin County should
petition for a time zone change to the
Central Time Zone in order to be in the
same time zone as Martin County.
Airports/Airline Services
With regard to airports/airline
services, the Commanding Officer of
NSWC Crane and Officer-in-Charge,
NSA Crane, noted that the travel office
processes 1200 to 1400 travel orders per
month and that the main airport used is
the Indianapolis International Airport.
The Community’s Economy/Economic
Development
The Dubois County Area
Development Corporation commented
in support of moving the Petitioning
Counties to the Eastern Time Zone as
did the Pike County Growth and
Development Council.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Newspapers
Several individuals supporting the
Central Time Zone noted that each of
the Petitioning Counties has its own
newspapers and that all have
subscribers from the surrounding
counties. In addition, these commenters
also pointed out that more residents of
the Petitioning Counties subscribe to the
Evansville Courier & Press than to the
Indianapolis Star.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54371
NSWC Crane, located primarily in
Martin County with small portions in
Greene and Lawrence Counties, has one
of the largest technical workforces in
Indiana and an annual operating budget
of $1.7 billion, with approximately 2500
employees and 1500 contract personnel.
NSWC Crane’s Commanding Officer and
Officer-in-Charge, NSA Crane, summed
up the benefits of a move to the Eastern
Time Zone saying, ‘‘It would enhance
the business climate for the regions, and
enhance the effectiveness of state and
local efforts to diversify the economic
base of the region as well as the
development of the WestGate@Crane
technology park.’’
Some individuals questioned the
information provided in the Joint
Petition and Supplemental Responses as
related to NSWC Crane noting that
rescheduling and logistical problems
have been worked out during the
months since the change in time zones.
They also asserted that companies
should have tracked and reported on
their losses that resulted from a time
zone change.
Schools, Recreation, Health Care, or
Religious Worship
With regard to schooling, comments
were submitted by school
superintendents, parents, and the
President of, as well as a professor of
business and management from,
Vincennes University. The
Superintendent of the North Daviess
Community Schools reported that the
North Daviess Community School Board
voted in favor of a return to the Eastern
Time Zone. The superintendent noted
that he concurred with the school
board’s vote and believes ‘‘it is in the
best interest of our entire school
community.’’ In support of his position,
the Superintendent stated that 25% of
the teaching staff lives in the Eastern
Time Zone, the entire athletic
conference is in a different time zone,
and that choral and band festivals with
neighboring schools in different time
zones have led ‘‘to confusion for parents
and spectators.’’ In addition, the
Superintendent of Greater Jasper
Consolidated Schools in Dubois County
supported a move to the Eastern Time
Zone. He stated that ‘‘in order to have
effective and timely communication
with regard to education issues, Greater
Jasper Consolidated School Corporation
needs to be on the same time as the
Department of Education in the State of
Indiana.’’ The Superintendent of the
Shoals Community School Corporation,
in Martin County, also commented in
favor of the Eastern Time Zone for
staffing, school start times, and class
schedules.
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
54372
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
With regard to post-secondary
education, the President of Vincennes
University pointed out that students
cross time zones daily and commented
in support of the Eastern Time Zone so
that each of its ‘‘campuses and sites
could function consistently on the same
time zone.’’
On the other hand, there were
commenters who said that schooling
issues favored the Central Time Zone.
For example, one commenter from
Dubois County noted that for postsecondary education, students in the
community go to colleges in the Central
Time Zone. The Vincennes University
professor submitted a comment in favor
of the Central Time Zone for Knox
County. His only reason was ‘‘They
have not been given enough time to
appreciate the change.’’ An individual
from Knox County noted that the Joint
Petition referred to ‘‘one of the smallest
public school systems in Knox County’’
in support of the Eastern Time Zone.
The commenter provided two tables
listing football and basketball schedules
for the largest school corporation in
Knox County to assert that if Knox
County remained in the Central Time
Zone even if the other Petitioning
Counties were changed, there would be
a higher percentage of games played in
the Central Time Zone.
With regard to recreation, the Martin
County Board of Commissioners noted
the proximity of Martin County to
Indiana University in Monroe County
and its cultural, sporting, and
educational opportunities for Martin
County residents, and that residents
could avail themselves to these
opportunities more easily if Martin
County were in the Eastern Time Zone.
The Dubois County Tourism
Commission also submitted a comment
supporting the Eastern Time Zone
stating, ‘‘We feel it is crucial to operate
on the same time zone as the majority
of our state, as well as our state capital,
Indianapolis.’’ In addition, the
Commission noted that two-thirds of the
business and leisure travelers to Dubois
County travel from the north and east,
areas that are in the Eastern Time Zone.
With regard to health care,
commenters expressed a time zone
preference based on the time zone of
their health care provider. Some gave no
reason. For example, the Huntington
Medical Association in Dubois County
submitted the following comment:
‘‘Please leave us on Central.’’ Others
supplied more explanation for their
preference. For example, an individual
from Knox County said that health care
is the ‘‘number one industry’’ in Knox
County and that the majority of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
patients come from the Central Time
Zone.
Regional Connections
Some commenters said that the
Petitioning Counties should be
considered to be within the Evansville
region. Others said that the Petitioning
Counties are more closely connected to
counties in the Eastern Time Zone. Yet
the majority of commenters who
mentioned regional connections noted
that the Petitioning Counties should be
kept together in the same time zone.
However, one commenter from Knox
County provided information in an
attempt to prove that Knox County ‘‘has
the greatest case to stay on Central
time,’’ although he did say that he
believed all the counties should be left
in the Central Time Zone.
DOT Determination With Regard to the
Petitioning Counties
Based on the Joint Petition, the three
Supplemental Responses, and
comments to the docket, DOT is
relocating, for the convenience of
commerce, the Petitioning Counties,
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and Dubois
Counties, from the Central Time Zone to
the Eastern Time Zone. We did not
receive information or data that would
persuade us to change from our initial
determination that the Petitioning
Counties submitted sufficient
information to justify a proposal for a
time zone change. The totality of the
information received by DOT supports a
time zone change for the convenience of
commerce.
2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
and Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Concerning Perry County
Perry County is located in southwest
Indiana, is contiguous to the Petitioning
Counties, and had its time zone changed
at the same time as the Petitioning
Counties. Therefore, DOT asked for
comments with regard to Perry County
in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
concerning the standard time zone
boundary in Southwest Indiana
published in the Federal Register on
July 19, 2007. (72 FR 39593). Under our
normal procedures, we do not take
action unless a county makes a clear
showing that the proposed change of
time zone would meet the statutory
standard. However, as we noted in our
previous rulemaking on time zone
boundary changes in Indiana, this has
been an unusual proceeding because of
the number of counties involved, their
relationship to each other and to other
neighboring counties, and the
circumstances leading up to the
petitions. DOT stated in the July 2007
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Register notice, ‘‘We also
understand that this proposal may have
an impact on surrounding Counties,
particularly Perry County which
changed time zone boundaries at the
same time as the Petitioning Counties.
* * * Our decision in the final rule will
be made on the basis of information and
comments developed during the entire
rulemaking proceeding.’’
At the time of the NPRM, DOT was
unaware that, on June 1, 2007, Perry
County submitted a Petition (2007 Perry
County Petition) (OST 2007–28746–654)
for a time zone boundary change back
to the Eastern Time Zone, if DOT
changed the time zone boundary of the
Petitioning Counties. DOT reviewed the
2007 Perry County Petition and the
exhibits attached to it. The 2007 Perry
County Petition addressed all of the
factors that we consider in these
proceedings. The 2007 Perry County
Petition provided information about
time zone impacts on businesses,
workers, and the economy;
transportation; radio, television, and the
print media; and schooling, healthcare,
and recreation. In addition, it included
considerations of a time zone change on
mail, safety, and energy as well as the
preferences of Perry County residents.
On July 31, 2007, DOT wrote to Perry
County requesting additional
information to justify that changing
Perry County back to the Eastern Time
Zone would serve the convenience of
commerce. In addition, on August 8,
2007, DOT provided notice of the 2007
Perry County Petition in a Supplemental
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. (72 FR
44466). DOT summarized the petition
Perry County filed in support of its
earlier request to change to the Central
Time Zone (the 2005 Perry County
Petition), the 2007 Perry County
Petition, and DOT’s questions on the
information submitted by Perry County.
DOT sought comments on the
justification provided by Perry County
and responsive information to its
questions.
On August 9, 2007, Perry County
submitted a response (Perry County
Supplemental Submission) to DOT’s
letter requesting additional information.
2005 and 2007 Perry County Petitions
and Perry County Supplemental
Submission
Community Imports and Exports
The 2005 Perry County Petition to
move from the Eastern Time Zone to the
Central Time Zone stated that the
primary employers in the county supply
products to customers located
throughout North America although
most of the customer base is located in
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the United States, either in the Midwest
or the South. In addition, it noted that
Perry County’s newer employers are
considered ‘‘just-in-time’’ suppliers to
the automotive industry which require a
location less than a day’s distance from
their respective customers.
In lieu of answering the question on
community imports and exports with an
overview or analysis of the matter, the
2007 Perry County Petition summarized
and attached 16 letters from businesses,
schools, a hospital, and individuals.
According to the 2007 Perry County
Petition, the letters express ‘‘a desire to
change to the Eastern Time Zone’’
because business conducted on Eastern
time and the difference in time zones
‘‘causes operating challenges on a daily
basis.’’ The 2007 Perry County Petition
noted that ‘‘businesses in Perry County
have in effect lost four hours of each day
that they can deal with customers and
suppliers from the Eastern Time Zone:
One hour in the morning, two hours at
lunch, and one hour at the end of the
day.’’ In further support of the Eastern
Time Zone request, the 2007 Perry
County Petition specifically references
three diverse businesses: The Southern
Indiana Rural Electric Cooperatives,
which would be the only Hoosier
Energy Power Network out of 17 that
would be in the Central Time Zone and
claims metering and billing problems;
Kleeman Masonary, Inc, which usually
travels east in its construction business;
and Perry County Memorial Hospital,
which has difficulties dealing with
insurance companies in the Eastern
Time Zone.
While the 2007 Perry County Petition
claimed the 16 letters attached to it are
from businesses and schools, DOT notes
that two of the letters were written on
business letterhead and merely
provided a preference for a time zone
without any justification. Another letter
stated that it is ‘‘more cumbersome’’ to
be on a different time zone, but provides
no explanation. In contrast to the 16
letters, the 2007 Perry County Petition
states that the Perry County Chamber of
Commerce has informed the Perry
County Commissioners that ‘‘there are
386 total employers located in Perry
County’’ and that 41% of businesses
have expressed a preference for the
Central Time Zone. The 2007 Perry
County Petition does not provide the
reasons for the ‘‘preference.’’
In order to more clearly assess the
impact of a time zone change on
businesses, DOT asked Perry County to
provide an analysis of time zone
impacts on businesses in the county and
the reasons for the time zone preference
expressed by Perry County businesses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
In response to DOT’s request, the
Perry County Supplemental Submission
stated, ‘‘The Perry County
Commissioners have no additional
analysis to submit; however attached
hereto as Exhibit ‘‘A’’ is an additional
letter from a local business which
expresses a preference for Eastern Time
Zone, and the reasons for the
preference.’’
Television and Radio Broadcasts
With regard to television broadcasts,
the 2005 Perry County Petition stated
that the County was ‘‘located within the
Area of Dominant Influence for the
Evansville, Indiana television market.’’
The 2005 Perry County Petition also
stated that Perry County ‘‘receives cable
and over-the-air broadcasts from the
Louisville, Kentucky market as well.’’
The 2007 Perry County Petition made
the same statements concerning
television broadcasts.
With regard to radio broadcasts, the
2005 Perry County Petition stated that
the ‘‘majority of the stations serving
Perry County are located either in the
Central Daylight Saving or Eastern
Standard time zones.’’ The 2007 Perry
County Petition elaborated on the
previous petition by providing a list of
AM and FM radio signals for five cities
within the County based on information
from radio-locator.com. As the 2007
Perry County Petition noted, residents
in the northern part of the County
primarily receive radio signals from the
Eastern Time Zone while residents in
the southern part of the County receive
radio signals from the Central Time
Zone. While the 2007 Perry County
Petition provides radio signal
information for five cities, it did not
provide any information about the
population of those cities.
In order to assess the impact of a time
zone change on television and radio
broadcasts, DOT asked Perry County for
population data for Bristow, Cannelton,
Leopold, St. Croix, and Tell City, the
localities referred to in the 2007 Perry
County Petition. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission provided the
2000 U.S. Census Bureau statistics for
Tell City and Cannelton and the U.S.
Census Bureau American Fact Finder
reports for the other cities. According to
this submission, the city or town and its
population are: Tell City—12,094;
Cannelton—2968; Bristow—1111;
Leopold—568; and St. Croix—462. As
noted in the 2007 Perry County Petition,
the population of Perry County is in
excess of 18,000. The majority of Perry
County’s residents live in Tell City and
Cannelton, in the southern part of the
County which receives its radio signals
from the Central Time Zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54373
Newspapers
The 2005 Perry County Petition
stated, ‘‘The primary daily newspaper
that serves Perry County is the
Evansville Courier & Press’’ in the
Central Time Zone and that the local
county newspaper, which publishes
editions twice per week, also operates a
printing plant that prints weekly
newspapers for two Central Time Zone
communities. On the other hand, the
2005 Perry County Petition also noted
that the Louisville Courier & Journal,
from the Eastern Time Zone, maintains
drop boxes for the Sunday edition at
several area convenience stores. Daily
service, however, is unavailable.
The 2007 Perry County Petition
provided more detailed information on
newspaper use within the County. The
2007 Perry County Petition asserted that
Perry County residents ‘‘primarily’’
receive their news from the local
newspaper, The Perry County News,
which is published twice a week.
Furthermore, according to the 2007
Perry County Petition, there are 1,901
weekday subscriptions and 2,271
Sunday subscriptions for the Evansville
Courier & Press. While this is consistent
with Perry County’s original request for
the Central Time Zone, the 2007 Perry
County Petition claimed that the
subscriptions support the Eastern Time
Zone because the population base is in
excess of 18,000. The 2007 Perry County
Petition also noted that the Indianapolis
Star has a very small circulation in the
County; and, that the Louisville CourierJournal has no daily subscriptions in the
County.
With regard to newspaper publishing,
DOT asked Perry County for the number
of subscriptions of The Perry County
News and the Indianapolis Star; the
total number of households in Perry
County; whether the residents of Perry
County receive any newspapers from
Daviess, Dubois, Knox, Martin, or Pike
Counties and; if residents do receive
newspaper from these counties, the
circulation numbers of those
newspapers within Perry County.
The Perry County Supplemental
Submission stated that there are 7270
households in Perry County and that the
total circulation and street sales for the
Perry County News are 5625. The Perry
County Supplemental Submission also
corrected the circulations for two
newspapers included in the 2007 Perry
County Petition. While the 2007 Perry
County Petition claimed that ‘‘the
Indianapolis Star has a very small
circulation in the County,’’ according to
the Perry County Supplemental
Response, the circulation is zero. With
regard to the Louisville Courier-Journal,
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
54374
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the 2007 Perry County Petition claimed
there were ‘‘no daily subscriptions in
the County.’’ According to the Perry
County Supplemental Response,
however, the Louisville Courier-Journal
distributes seven daily and thirteen
Sunday newspapers in Perry County. As
for other newspapers, the Perry County
Supplemental Response stated that the
Jasper Dubois County Herald reports 40
mail subscribers in Perry County, but
did not provide any information with
regard to newspaper subscriptions for
Daviess, Knox, Martin, or Pike County
newspapers.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Bus and Passenger Rail Service
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated
that there are no bus or passenger rail
services in the community. The 2007
Perry County Petition explained bus
service in more detail, contrasting bus
service provided in Evansville and
Louisville, and freight rail services. The
2007 Perry County Petition noted that
Evansville is approximately 50 miles
away and offers services to western and
southern routes. In contrast, Louisville
is approximately 75 miles away and
offers service to the north, northeast,
and south. As for rail service, although
DOT requested information on
passenger rail service, the 2007 Perry
County Petition referred only to freight
rail service that carries goods through
several southern Indiana counties.
Airports/Airline Services
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated
that the nearest airport is in Evansville,
IN, located in the Central Time Zone,
approximately 55 miles from Perry
County. The 2005 Perry County Petition
also noted that that there is an airport
in Louisville, KY, in the Eastern Time
Zone, 75 miles from Perry County. The
2007 Perry County Petition reiterated
the same information with regard to
airport location and supplemented it by
referring to the number of departures
and destinations and the impact of early
morning flights on travelers. According
to the 2007 Perry County Petition, the
Evansville Regional Airport has,
approximately, only 35 daily departures
in contrast to Louisville International
Airport which offers daily departures to
‘‘around 140 domestic destinations plus
53 international destinations.’’ The 2007
Perry County Petition also noted that
because Louisville International Airport
is in the Eastern Time Zone, it is
‘‘extremely difficult’’ to take early
morning flights unless travelers spend
the night at or near the airport.
Worker Commuting Patterns
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated
that 3,267 persons, or 26% of its total
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
workforce, reside in Perry County but
work outside of the County. Of the top
five areas to which Perry County
residents commute for work, four were
in the Central Time Zone and, the fifth,
Dubois County, was at that time
requesting to be located in the Central
Time Zone. (Dubois County is now
requesting to be moved back to the
Eastern Time Zone.) A STATS Indiana
Annual Commuting Trends Profile
based on Indiana IT–40 Returns for Tax
Year 2003 was attached to the 2005
Perry County Petition.
The 2007 Perry County Petition also
referred to the Perry County workforce.
The actual numbers provided differ
from the earlier submission because
they are from STATS Indiana Annual
Commuting Trends Profile based on
Indiana IT–40 Returns for Tax Year
2005. Nevertheless, the percentage of
the workforce that leaves the County did
not change; it remains 26%.
The Community’s Economy/Economic
Development
The 2005 Perry County Petition
discussed the major elements of the
community’s economy, the
improvement in the County’s economy,
and efforts to ensure that the local
economy continues to improve. The
2005 Perry County Petition noted ‘‘a
dramatic shift from traditional
woodworking industries to a significant
transportation cluster.’’ It stated that the
‘‘primary employers manufacture
products for the automotive, heavy
truck, and aerospace industries.’’ The
2005 Perry County Petition also referred
to a regional rural hospital and noted
the planning and infrastructure the
County put in place to support future
economic growth and its partnerships to
enhance growth.
The 2007 Perry County Petition’s
answer to the question on the
community’s economy is nearly
identical to the 2005 Perry County
Petition. There is only one change. The
2007 Perry County Petition eliminated,
in this response, reference to ‘‘a regional
rural hospital which serves counties in
Southern Indiana and Western
Kentucky, located in the Central time
zone.’’ However, it included the
reference to the hospital in response to
the question concerning health care.
In order to assess the impact of a time
zone change on the community’s
economy, DOT asked Perry County to
identify whether Perry County has
entered into economic partnerships
with Daviess, Dubois, Knox, Martin, or
Pike Counties or other Counties in
southern Indiana and, if it has entered
into partnerships, the nature of these
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
partnerships and how a time zone
change would affect them.
The Perry County Supplemental
Submission stated that Perry County is
a member of both the Indiana 15
Regional Planning Commission and the
Southwest Indiana Development
Council. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission noted that if
both the Joint Petition and the 2007
Perry County petition result in a time
zone change for the 6 Southwestern
Indiana Counties they cover, the change
would impact the Indiana 15 Regional
Planning Commission and the
Southwest Indiana Development
Council by reducing the number of
Counties in the Central Time Zone.
Schools, Recreation, Health Care, or
Religious Worship
With regard to schools, the 2005 Perry
County Petition emphasized postsecondary education. While the 2005
Perry County Petition recognized that
Perry County residents attend postsecondary schools in the Eastern and
Central Time Zones, it noted that more
Perry County residents go to the
University of Southern Indiana in the
Central Time Zone than any other
school.
The 2007 Perry County Petition
shifted the focus from post-secondary
education to the high school level. It
noted that no Perry County school
districts are in more than one time zone,
but said that the schools cross time
zones to participate in sporting events.
Exhibits 10 through 14 to the 2007 Perry
County Petition provided information
on the athletic conferences in southern
Indiana, and the schedules for
basketball, volleyball, football, cross
country, baseball, and softball. The 2007
Perry County Petition asserted that
playing games in different time zones
‘‘causes extreme complications with
scheduling and arrival and departure
times for the schools.’’
The 2005 Perry County Petition did
not address recreation or whether
County residents left the County to
pursue recreational interests. The 2007
Perry County Petition, however, stated,
‘‘Perry County prides itself on its
outdoor recreational activities including
the vast amounts of Hoosier National
Forest and ready access to the Ohio
River for recreation such as boating,
fishing and hunting.’’ The 2007 Perry
County Petition also referred to
recreational softball, baseball, and
soccer leagues that could play later into
the evening if the County were located
in the Eastern Time Zone.
In order to assess the impact of a time
zone change on recreation, DOT
requested information on whether
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
residents leave Perry County for
recreation and the standard of time
observed in the places where they go for
this purpose. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission stated, ‘‘Perry
County was unable to locate any
statistics concerning what percentage of
residents leave the county for
recreation.’’
With regard to health care, the 2005
Perry County Petition noted that Perry
County is ‘‘home to a regional rural
hospital.’’ It also noted that residents
‘‘primarily travel to Evansville and
Jasper, Indiana’’ to purchase health
services. Like the 2005 Perry County
Petition, the 2007 Perry County Petition
also noted the regional hospital and
refers to a letter from Perry County
Memorial Hospital. The letter stated that
the hospital conducts ‘‘a lot of business
with our State Capitol in Indianapolis’’
and that ‘‘the large insurance
companies’’ that it does business with
are also located there.
While the letter from Perry County
Memorial Hospital provides business
reasons for an Eastern Time Zone
preference, it does not address the
impact of the current time zone on Perry
County residents and whether they are
referred to health care providers in other
time zones. Therefore, in order to assess
the impact of a time zone change on
health care, DOT requested information
on the number of patients referred from
Perry County to health care providers in
Evansville, Jasper, Indianapolis, and
Louisville. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission provided
information concerning the patients
transferred from Perry County Memorial
Hospital in 2006. According to the Perry
County Memorial Hospital transfer
information, 728 out of 838 patients in
2006 were transferred to hospitals in the
Central Time Zone. Two of these Central
Time Zone hospitals are in Evansville,
IN, and the other is located in
Owensboro, KY.
Neither the 2005 Perry County
Petition nor the 2007 Perry County
Petition addressed religious worship
and DOT had no additional questions
concerning this issue.
Regional Connections
In the original rulemaking proceeding
to change time zone boundaries from
the Eastern Time Zone to the Central
Time Zone, the Petitioning Counties,
Perry County, and commenters
advocated for a move by referring to
their ties to other Indiana counties
currently in the Central Time Zone.
DOT carefully reviewed this data and
utilized it in reaching its decision. DOT
recognized the importance of regional
connections and the benefits of similar
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
time zones and regional ties among
counties. As described in the summary
of the hearings and comments to the
docket in DOT’s January 2006 Final
Rule, the Southwestern Counties have
strong regional ties to each other and
Central Time Zone Counties. DOT
stated, ‘‘While Daviess, Dubois, Knox,
Martin, and Perry border other Indiana
counties in the Eastern Time Zone, their
ties to those counties is not as strong as
they are to each other and to other
counties to their south, which are
currently in the Central Time Zone.
Along with Pike, these counties are
located in the same workforce,
commerce, transportation, and
education regions designated by
Indiana. Remaining in the same time
zone and maintaining their regional ties
better position counties to realize
advantages in economic, cultural, social,
and civic activities, thereby serving the
convenience of commerce.’’
The 2007 Perry County Petition
addressed regional connections by
noting that at DOT’s hearing on time
zones in November 2005, ‘‘Perry County
representatives stated that one of the
reasons for the requested change was
the fact that Dubois County was also
petitioning to be placed in the Central
Time Zone.’’ The 2007 Perry County
Petition also noted that five other
counties in the area petitioned for a time
zone change back to the Eastern Time
Zone.
DOT asked Perry County to address
the regional connectivity of Perry
County with other counties in southern
Indiana, including those that have and
have not petitioned for a time zone
change and how a time zone change
would affect regional connections. The
Perry County Supplemental Submission
stated, ‘‘Perry County has no additional
information to submit in this response.’’
Comments Addressing Perry County’s
Request
In addition to general comments
received on the proposed time zone
change for the Petitioning Counties and
Perry County’s request for a time zone
change, DOT also received specific
comments on the 2007 Perry County
Petition. In general, Perry County
individuals and businesses commented
in support of a change to the Eastern
Time Zone and also in favor of staying
in the Central Time Zone. Businesses
supporting the Eastern Time Zone
referred to the general impact of lost
ability to work with customers and
suppliers. Some were more specific,
referring to the actual impact on their
business. For example, one trucking and
excavating company referred to dealing
with an Indiana county to the east that
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54375
is located in the Eastern Time Zone.
Because of this specific relationship, the
owner supported the Eastern Time Zone
for the County. Other commenters
referred to the Petitioning Counties and
said if the five other Counties were
going to change time zones, Perry
County should too.
Those preferring the Central Time
Zone also expressed both general and
specific reasons to remain in the Central
Time Zone. Commenters noted that
nothing has changed in Perry County
since the 2005 Perry County Petition
and that Central Time is working for
them personally and for their
businesses. One commenter responded
to the assertion that Perry County
should change time zones because the
five other Counties were changing by
quoting his mother saying, ‘‘if the other
person jumps off of a bridge it does not
mean that you have to jump too.’’ The
overwhelming majority of commenters
concerning the time zone boundary for
Perry County based their choice on
personal preferences.
There were comments with regard to
the specific aspects of the convenience
of commerce standard. While many
assertions were made generally, there
are a few that are worth noting. With
regard to health care, commenters
asserted that Perry County residents go
to Owensboro, KY, to visit health care
professionals. For example, one
commenter expressed concern that DOT
did not specifically request information
about Owensboro and noted that a
‘‘GREAT NUMBER’’ of Perry County
residents travel to Owensboro for
doctor’s appointments, hospital visits,
outpatient surgery, and children’s
orthodontist appointments. With regard
to the education aspect of the
convenience of commerce standard, the
Superintendent of Cannelton City
Schools commented on behalf of the
Board of School Trustees. The
Superintendent requested that Perry
County remain on Central Time based
on safety concerns of the students.
DOT Determination With Regard to
Perry County
As we have noted, DOT’s
determination as to whether to grant a
request to change a time zone boundary
is based upon our review of the
information submitted. If sufficient
information is not submitted to justify a
time zone change under the statutory
standard, the petition will be denied.
Perry County has failed to make that
showing.
Perry County did not provide
responsive information concerning the
effect of a time zone change on
community imports and exports.
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
54376
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Instead, it made general assertions about
businesses losing four hours each day to
deal with customers and suppliers
because of a time zone difference and
offered 16 letters from businesses,
schools, a hospital, and individuals
supporting a change to the Eastern Time
Zone. However, Perry County also
stated that 41% of employers expressed
a preference for the Central Time Zone.
The majority of the Perry County
population receives television and radio
broadcasts from the Central Time Zone.
While a much smaller number of
residents, in the northern part of the
County may receive more broadcasts
from the Eastern Time Zone, Central
Time Zone broadcasts are still readily
available. In addition, the majority of
households (5625 out of 7270) get the
local newspaper published in Perry
County. Of the residents interested in
subscribing to another newspaper,
nearly 2000 subscribe to the Evansville
Courier & Press published in the Central
Time Zone. As for newspapers
published in the Eastern Time Zone,
less then 50 residents are regular
subscribers. Therefore, neither
television and radio broadcasting nor
newspaper circulation support a move
back to the Eastern Time Zone.
With regard to the worker commuting
patterns factor, statistics show that 76%
of the Perry County workforce resides
and works in the County. Of the 26%
that works outside of the County, at
least 65% work in Central Time Zone
Counties within Indiana or in Kentucky.
Although Perry County has noted its
participation in a planning commission
and development council, Perry County
has not provided any information about
any past, current, or planned economic
partnerships between Perry County and
any of the Petitioning Counties or other
Southwestern Indiana Counties that
would result in jobs in the region,
enhancing the County’s economy, or
increasing the County’s tax base.
Accordingly, Perry County has not
provided persuasive evidence that, with
regard to worker commuting patterns or
the community’s economy or economic
development, a time zone change would
be beneficial to the County. With regard
to health care, the majority of patients
are referred to providers in the Central
Time Zone, and Perry County has not
shown that a change in the time zone is
warranted for reasons related to health
care. With regard to regional
connectivity, Perry County provides no
support for its request for a time zone
change other than to refer to comments
made at the 2005 hearings and the
Petitioning Counties made no reference
to any ties to Perry County in their
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
discussions of connections with other
Indiana counties. Passenger rail, bus,
and airline services, education,
recreation, and religious worship in
Perry County do not appear to be
impacted by time zones. However, at the
high school level, athletic competition
crosses time zones, and sporting events
are played in both the Eastern and
Central Time Zones.
Based on the information submitted
by Perry County and by other comments
to the docket, Perry County appears to
be oriented to the Central Time Zone
and Perry County has not provided
sufficient information based upon the
convenience of commerce standard and
DOT’s time zone factors to justify a time
zone change. Therefore, DOT denies the
2007 Perry County Petition.
The Future of Time in Indiana
Impact on Observance of Daylight
Saving Time
This final rule does not affect the
observance of Daylight Saving Time.
Under the Uniform Time Act of 1966, as
amended, the standard time of each
time zone in the United States is
advanced one hour from 2 a.m. on the
second Sunday in March until 2 a.m. on
the first Sunday in November, except in
any State that has, by law, exempted
itself from this observance. In 2006,
under State law, Indiana began
observing Daylight Saving Time
throughout the State. Both Central and
Eastern Time Zone counties now
observe Daylight Saving Time thereby
preserving a one hour time difference
throughout the year. This final rule does
not change Indiana’s decision to observe
Daylight Saving Time statewide.
Practical Application of This Final Rule
The effective date of this final rule is
November 4, 2007, the changeover date
from Daylight Saving Time to standard
time. At 2 a.m. Central Daylight Saving
Time, the Petitioning Counties do not
change their clocks, because they are
returning to the Eastern Time Zone. At
2 a.m., the Petitioning Counties will be
on Eastern Standard Time. As for Perry
County, at 2 a.m., because Indiana now
observes Daylight Saving Time, the
clocks in Perry County should be moved
back one hour, to 1 a.m. Central
Standard Time. On March 9, 2008, the
changeover date to Daylight Saving
Time, all Indiana clocks will be moved
ahead one hour.
New Petitions for a Time Zone Change
in Indiana
As evidenced by the comments to the
docket, time zone boundary changes can
be extremely disruptive to a community.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Therefore, a time zone change should
not be made without careful
consideration. DOT’s decision to change
a time zone boundary is based on the
statutory standard ‘‘regard for the
convenience of commerce and the
existing junction points and division
points of common carriers engaged in
interstate or foreign commerce,’’ which
DOT defines very broadly to include
consideration of all the impacts upon a
community of a change in its standard
of time. To minimize disruption to
Indiana communities and their residents
and to allow DOT and these
communities to fully assess the impact
of changes to the time zone boundaries,
DOT will not consider any petitions for
a time zone change from any elected
officials in Indiana for at least one year
after the effective date of this final rule.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
This final rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. It has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget under
that Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Transportation (44
FR 11040; February 26, 1979). We
expect the economic impact of this final
rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph
10e of the regulatory policies and
procedures of DOT is unnecessary. The
rule primarily affects the convenience of
individuals in scheduling activities. By
itself, it imposes no direct costs. Its
impact is localized in nature.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this final rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This
rule primarily affects individuals and
their scheduling of activities. Although
it would affect some small businesses,
not-for-profits and, perhaps, a number
of small governmental jurisdictions, we
have not received comments asserting
that our proposal, if adopted, would
have had a significant economic impact
on small entities.
Therefore, I certify under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this final rule does not have
a significant economic impact on a
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
substantial number of small entities.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better implement it.
Collection of Information
This final rule does not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This final rule
does not have a substantial direct effect
on, or sufficient federalism implications
for, the States, nor would it limit the
policymaking discretion of the States.
Therefore, the consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13132
do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) and E.O.
12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership, (58 FR 58093; October 28,
1993) govern the issuance of Federal
regulations that impose unfunded
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a
regulation that requires a State, local, or
tribal government or the private sector
to incur direct costs without the Federal
Government’s having first provided the
funds to pay those costs. This final rule
would not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This final rule does not result in a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under E.O.
12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this final rule
under E.O. 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety as defined by
the Executive Order that may
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Sep 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Environment
This rulemaking is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
under the National Environmental
Policy Act and, therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not
required.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 71
Time zones.
I For the reasons discussed above, the
Office of the Secretary amends Title 49
part 71 to read as follows:
PART 71—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1–4, 40 Stat. 450, as
amended; sec. 1, 41 Stat. 1446, as amended;
secs. 2–7, 80 Stat. 107, as amended; 100 Stat.
764; Act of Mar. 19, 1918, as amended by the
Uniform Time Act of 1966 and Pub. L. 97–
449, 15 U.S.C. 260–267; Pub. L. 99–359; Pub.
L. 106–564, 15 U.S.C. 263, 114 Stat. 2811; 49
CFR 1.59(a).
2. Paragraph (b) of § 71.5, Boundary
line between eastern and central zones,
is revised to read as follows:
I
§ 71.5 Boundary line between eastern and
central zones.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Indiana-Illinois. From the junction
of the western boundary of the State of
Michigan with the northern boundary of
the State of Indiana easterly along the
northern boundary of the State of
Indiana to the east line of LaPorte
County; thence southerly along the east
line of LaPorte County to the north line
of Starke County; thence east along the
north line of Starke County to the west
line of Marshall County; thence south
along the west line of Marshall County;
thence west along the north line of
Pulaski County to the east line of Jasper
County; thence south along the east line
of Jasper County to the south line of
Jasper County; thence west along the
south lines of Jasper and Newton
Counties to the western boundary of the
State of Indiana; thence south along the
western boundary of the State of Indiana
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54377
to the north line of Gibson County;
thence easterly and northerly along the
north line of Gibson County to the west
line of Pike County; thence south along
the west line of Pike County to the north
line of Warrick County; thence east
along the north line of Warrick and
Spencer Counties to the west line of
Perry County; thence easterly and
southerly along the north and east line
of Perry County to the Indiana-Kentucky
boundary.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC on: September
19, 2007.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–4721 Filed 9–20–07; 1:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018—AU77
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Prudency Determination
for the Designation of Critical Habitat
for Trichostema austromontanum ssp.
compactum
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have
reconsidered whether designating
critical habitat for Trichostema
austromontanum ssp. compactum, a
plant, is prudent. We listed this taxon
as threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
in 1998; at that time, we determined
that designation of critical habitat was
not prudent, because designation would
increase the degree of threat to the taxon
and would not benefit the taxon. As a
consequence of a settlement agreement,
we withdrew our previous not-prudent
determination, and agreed to reevaluate
the prudency of designating critical
habitat. However, based on our review
and evaluation of the best scientific and
commercial information available, we
believe that designation of critical
habitat continues to be not prudent for
T. a. ssp. compactum.
DATES: This rule becomes effective on
October 25, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials we
receive, as well as supporting
documentation used in the preparation
of this determination, will be available
for public inspection, by appointment,
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54367-54377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4721]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 71
[OST Docket No. 2007-28746]
RIN 2105-AD71
Standard Time Zone Boundary in Southwest Indiana
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), the Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DOT is relocating the time zone boundary in Indiana to move
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and Dubois Counties from the Central Time
Zone to the Eastern Time Zone. This action is taken at the request of
the Boards of Commissioners of each of the Counties and this change
serves the convenience of commerce, the statutory standard for a time
zone change. DOT is denying a petition from Perry County to change its
time zone boundary. Perry County will remain in the Central Time Zone.
DATES: The effective time and date is 2 a.m. CDT, November 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith S. Kaleta, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, indianatime@dot.gov, (202) 493-0992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Current Indiana Time Observance
Indiana is divided into 92 counties. Under Federal law, 75 counties
are in the Eastern Time Zone and 17 are in the Central Time Zone. There
are six Central Time Zone Counties in the northwest (Lake, Porter, La
Porte, Starke, Newton, and Jasper) and eleven in the southwest (Knox,
Daviess, Martin, Gibson, Pike, Dubois, Posey, Vanderburgh, Warrick,
Spencer, and Perry). Neighboring states differ as to whether they
observe Eastern or Central Time. Illinois and western Kentucky observe
Central Time, while eastern Kentucky, Ohio, and the portion of Michigan
adjoining Indiana observe Eastern Time.
Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and Dubois Counties (the Petitioning
Counties) and Perry County were moved to the Central Time Zone in
January 2006. (71 FR 3228). On August 18, 2006, the Boards of
Commissioners of the Petitioning Counties filed a Joint Petition
requesting a time zone change back to the Eastern Time Zone. In
addition, on June 1, 2007, Perry County filed a petition requesting a
time zone change back to the Eastern Time Zone, if the Petitioning
Counties were changed.
Statutory Requirements
Under the Standard Time Act of 1918, as amended by the Uniform Time
Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260-64), the Secretary of Transportation has
authority to issue regulations modifying the boundaries between time
zones in the United States in order to move an area from one time zone
to another. The standard to modify a boundary contained in the statute
for such decisions is ``regard for the convenience of commerce and the
existing junction points and division points of common carriers engaged
in interstate or foreign commerce.'' 15 U.S.C. 261.
DOT Procedures To Change a Time Zone Boundary
DOT typically uses a set of procedures to address time zone issues.
Under these procedures, DOT will generally begin a rulemaking
proceeding to change a time zone boundary if the highest elected
officials in the area submit a petition requesting a time zone change
and provide adequate data supporting the proposed change. We ask that
the petition include, or be accompanied by, detailed information
supporting the requesting party's contention that the requested change
would serve the convenience of commerce. The principle for deciding
whether to change a time zone is defined very broadly to include
consideration of all impacts of such a change on a community. We also
ask that the supporting documentation address, at a minimum, each of
the following questions in as much detail as possible:
1. From where do businesses in the community get their supplies,
and to where do they ship their goods or products?
2. From where does the community receive television and radio
broadcasts?
3. Where are the newspapers published that serve the community?
4. From where does the community get its bus and passenger rail
services; if there is no scheduled bus or passenger rail service in the
community, to where must residents go to obtain these services?
5. Where is the nearest airport; if it is a local service airport,
to what major airport does it carry passengers?
6. What percentage of residents of the community work outside the
community; where do these residents work?
7. What are the major elements of the community's economy; is the
community's economy improving or declining; what Federal, State, or
local plans, if any, are there for economic development in the
community?
8. If residents leave the community for schooling, recreation,
health care, or religious worship, what standard of time is observed in
the places where they go for these purposes?
In addition, we consider any other information that the elected
officials believe to be relevant to the proceeding. We consider the
effect on economic, cultural, social, and civic activities, and how a
change in time zone would affect businesses, communication,
transportation, and education.
2005-2006 Indiana Time Zone Rulemaking Proceedings Involving the
Petitioning Counties and Perry County
In the summer of 2005, a new Indiana state law adopted Daylight
Saving Time for the entire State and further provided that the State
supported the county executives of any county that sought to change
time zones. On August 17, 2005, DOT published a notice in the Federal
Register inviting county and local officials in Indiana that wished to
change their current time zone to notify DOT of their request for a
change by September 16, 2005, and to provide data in response to the
questions identified in the previous section on DOT Procedures to
Change a Time Zone Boundary. DOT received 19 petitions from counties
asking to be changed from the Eastern Time Zone to the Central
[[Page 54368]]
Time Zone, including the Petitioning Counties and Perry County.
In 2005, the Petitioning Counties submitted their petitions
individually. In these petitions, they enumerated reasons for a move to
the Central Time Zone based in large part on comments made during open,
local public meetings in their respective counties. The Daviess County
petition emphasized Evansville (in the Central Time Zone) as the place
with the closest airport and the place where its residents shop,
conduct business, and receive television broadcasts, with ``numerous
citizens'' employed in Gibson County (in the Central Time Zone). The
Dubois County petition pointed out that while many services are
obtained within-county, the decision to move to the Central Time Zone
was supported by ``60 to 70% of the general public, by representatives
of three local school districts, and by approximately 50% of local
business and industry.'' The Knox County petition stated that many of
its residents work in the Central Time Zone, creating ``time zone
issues during substantial portions of the year'' and those residents
who leave for schooling, recreation, healthcare and religious worship
go to areas in the Central Time Zone. The Martin County petition stated
that ``inclusion in the Central Time Zone is preferred by a majority of
those responding,'' that 40% of its residents work outside of the
County (mainly in the Central Time Zone), and that the primary
providers of goods and recipients of products to and from the County
are already located in or are petitioning to be in the Central Time
Zone. The Pike County petition cited television and radio broadcasting,
the interests of its mining industry and an increasing number of
employees commuting to counties in the Central Time Zone. The Perry
County petition provided detailed information to illustrate how a
change to the Central Time Zone would serve the convenience of
commerce. It discussed how the television broadcasts, newspapers, and
work patterns favor Perry County being located in the Central Time
Zone.
Based on these petitions and comments that were submitted to the
docket and made at the public hearings, as well as an analysis of
Indiana economic, workforce, transportation, and education regions, and
media/commerce data, DOT concluded that the Petitioning Counties and
Perry County have stronger ties to each other and to other counties to
their south in the Central Time Zone than to the counties on their
northern and eastern borders in the Eastern Time Zone. DOT, therefore,
granted the petitions and changed the time zone boundaries for the
Petitioning Counties and Perry County from the Eastern Time Zone to the
Central Time Zone. The change to the Central Time Zone became effective
on April 2, 2006.
The Petitioning Counties Joint Petition
Only a few months after the Petitioning Counties began to observe
Central Time, on August 18, 2006, the Boards of Commissioners of the
Petitioning Counties jointly submitted a new petition (Joint Petition)
in which they enumerated the reasons that the Petitioning Counties, as
a unit, should be changed back to the Eastern Time Zone. As compared to
the 2005 petitions from the Petitioning Counties, the Joint Petition
included more detailed information in answer to the questions DOT
considers in making time zone determinations as well as exhibits in
support of these answers.
The Joint Petition requested a change contrary to the Petitioning
Counties' positions in their 2005 individual petitions. The Joint
Petition claimed the 2005 petitions ``were incomplete and conclusory,
and the information they contained was limited and largely based on
opinion and not backed by substantial and verifiable evidence.'' The
Joint Petition stated that, since the January 2006 ruling, there has
been ``a groundswell of support for returning to the Eastern Time Zone,
which has been a product of residents and businesses having been
inconvenienced in ways that they could not have fully anticipated until
the switch occurred.'' Accordingly, the Joint Petition claimed ``to
contain more extensive and thorough research on this issue.''
The Joint Petition was accompanied by letters from Indiana Governor
Daniels, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation, and the Indiana
Department of Workforce Development. The Governor wrote in support of
the Joint Petition, stating that putting more of the State on the same
time zone will provide clarity on the time questions and advance
economic growth. The two Indiana organizations addressed regional
connectivity. They noted that they established their respective State
regions based on their ability to deliver services. They did not
establish regions based on time zones or ``convenience of commerce.''
After reviewing the Joint Petition and its accompanying exhibits
and letters of support, on September 28, 2006, DOT sent a letter to the
Petitioning Counties requesting that certain procedural concerns be
addressed. Specifically, DOT requested the submission of amended
signature pages for each county, certifying that the request was the
result of official action by the Board of County Commissioners, the
vote of the Board members concerning the submission of the Joint
Petition, the date of the vote, and the signature for each Board
member. The Petitioning Counties complied with this request on November
13, 2006 (First Supplemental Response).
On November 14, 2006, the DOT sent a second letter seeking
clarification and additional information from the Petitioning Counties
before making any determination on whether to propose a time zone
boundary change for the Petitioning Counties. In turn, on December 6,
2006, the Petitioning Counties submitted a supplemental response and
appendix (Second Supplemental Response) to DOT's request for this
additional substantive information. In response to an additional
request from DOT, on May 29, 2007, the Petitioning Counties sent
another letter accompanied by numerous exhibits (Third Supplemental
Response).
2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Concerning the Petitioning Counties
Based on the Joint Petition and the three Supplemental Responses,
on July 19, 2007, DOT published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the
Federal Register finding that the Petitioning Counties provided enough
information to justify proposing to change their boundary from the
Central Time Zone to the Eastern Time Zone. The Petitioning Counties
addressed all of the factors that DOT considers in these proceedings.
The Petitioning Counties sufficiently justified proposing a change
to the Eastern Time Zone based on information submitted concerning
community imports and exports, bus service, the community's economy and
economic development, schooling, recreation, and regional connections.
With regard to community imports and exports, the Petitioning Counties
submitted sufficient information to show that many businesses and
industries located in the Petitioning Counties have substantial
business connections in the Eastern Time Zone. In addition, the
Petitioning Counties submitted sufficient information to show that the
convenience of commerce would better be served if businesses did not
have to adjust for time zone differences. With regard to bus service,
the Petitioning Counties provided information on the broader bus
service available in locations in the Eastern Time Zone. The
Petitioning Counties provided sufficient information to justify
proposing a change back to the Eastern Time Zone under the
[[Page 54369]]
community's economy/economic development and regional connections
factors based upon a proposed extension of Interstate 69 (I-69) through
central and southwestern Indiana and the economic impact of the Naval
Surface Warfare Center in Crane (NSWC Crane). The Petitioning Counties
pointed out that the expansion of I-69 would provide more economical
and efficient access to Indianapolis because traffic will be able to
flow north from southwest Indiana to the larger network of highways
that go through Indianapolis. The Petitioning Counties submitted
sufficient information concerning the recreation aspect of the
convenience of commerce standard based on sporting activities and area
attractions. The Petitioning Counties also submitted sufficient
information concerning the education aspect of the convenience of
commerce standard to justify proposing to change the time zone boundary
based on after school activities and higher education.
On the other hand, DOT found that the Petitioning Counties did not
submit sufficient information with regard to several other factors,
including worker commuting patterns, television/radio broadcasting,
newspapers, airports/airline services. In addition, the Petitioning
Counties did not submit sufficient information concerning the religious
observance or health care aspect of the convenience of commerce
standard to justify proposing to change the time zone boundary.
Nevertheless, overall, the Petitioning Counties made a sufficient case
that changing back to the Eastern Time Zone would serve the convenience
of commerce.
Comments to the Docket--An Overview
There were over 3500 entries to the docket in this proceeding
concerning both the Petitioning Counties and Perry County. The vast
majority of the comments were submitted either in e-mails, letters, or
information submissions to DOT's Docket Management System.
Approximately 225 persons left a telephone message for, or talked with,
the contact person noted in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. A list
of these persons is included in the docket. DOT notes that comments
submitted to the prior time zone proceeding docket, OST-2005-22114,
after the issuance of DOT's July 2006 final rule but before the July
2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, were transferred to this docket and
considered before issuing this final rule.
Comments were made by the residents of the Petitioning Counties and
Perry County, as well as other counties in Indiana, including Lawrence,
Marion, Monroe, Orange, Owen, and Spencer Counties. Although this
proceeding is only to address whether the time zone boundary should be
changed for the Petitioning Counties and Perry County, the commenters
suggested a wide variety of approaches to establishing time zone
boundaries in Indiana, including moving their county to the Eastern
Time Zone, keeping their county in the Central Time Zone, placing all
of the State in the Eastern Time Zone, and placing all of the State in
the Central Time Zone. Some said that they did not care whether it was
the Central Time Zone or the Eastern Time Zone, they just wanted the
State to be in the same time zone. A few commenters asked DOT to give
Indiana a time zone and then ``stay in it.'' Others said that shifting
time zones made things more confusing.
Comments were submitted by elected officials. Governor Daniels,
State Representative Crooks, the Martin County Commissioners (jointly),
Martin County Commissioner Boyd in his individual capacity, Pike County
Commissioner Flint, Martin County Council Member Gee, and City of
Jasper Mayor Schmitt and Jasper's seven council members submitted
comments supporting the Eastern Time Zone. Santa Claus Town Councilman
Burke submitted a comment in favor of the Central Time Zone for the
Petitioning Counties.
Comments were filed by individuals expressing their personal
interests and preferences as well as their views on how a time zone
change would be for the convenience of commerce. Some commenters made
the choice of time zone reluctantly. The Martin County Board of
Commissioners, for example, noted that they favored the entire State to
be in the same time zone, but preferred the Eastern Time Zone as an
alternative. This same sentiment was echoed by one Daviess County
businessman who stated, ``While I personally feel the entire state
should be on the Central Time Zone due to our geographic location in
the nation, we as a company would be better served to be in sync with
the rest of the state. I thereby grudgingly request that Daviess be
moved back to the Eastern Time Zone.'' But as one commenter observed,
``we all have to see by now that there are benefits to both time
zones.''
Most commenters identified themselves, although some comments were
submitted anonymously. Several individuals submitted multiple comments,
usually providing commentary on information submitted by others. Some
noted their affiliation as concerned parents and grandparents,
interested family members, and volunteers.
Comments were also submitted by a variety of business interests
including a chamber of commerce. Cabinet and furniture manufacturers,
banks, natural gas and electric companies, trucking companies, real
estate offices, a university professor, lawyers, and grain and
livestock farmers commented. Health care and insurance providers,
construction companies, a sawmill and logging operator, information
technology and metal companies, and small retail businesses also
commented.
Some comments included multiple signatures or multiple commenters.
For example, with his letter, Representative Crooks submitted not only
the results of his 2007 legislative survey, but the approximately 2500
actual responses that included comments on the time zone issue.
Representative Crooks concluded by requesting that DOT return the
Petitioning Counties to the Eastern Time Zone. In addition, the creator
of advertisements and a Web site for DuboisCounty4CentralTime.com
submitted approximately 500 comments on the time zone issue. Each of
the comments included the commenter's name, e-mail address, business
affiliation (if applicable), time zone preference, and additional
comments. While there were some comments in support of the Eastern Time
Zone, as noted by the submitter, ``the resounding support from business
and the public is for central time.''
DOT has recognized that time zone changes can be disruptive to a
community and very divisive. Some commenters accused others of
providing ``half truths and misleading information.'' However, the
lengths to which some would go to support a time zone change in their
favor became apparent in the filing of two comments, one from the town
of Ireland and the other from St. Raphael Catholic Church, both located
in Dubois County and in support of the Central Time Zone. The former
included the names of 114 persons, the latter included 320 names, and
neither included signatures. DOT was advised by the pastor of St.
Raphael, the president of the St. Raphael's parish council, and
individuals on the lists that both lists were fraudulently submitted
and did not represent the views of the persons on the list.
The primary reasons given by those in favor of the Central Time
Zone include the benefit to commerce and increasing availability for
communication with customers on the West coast; geographic location of
the State, with closer ties to Evansville, IN, and Owensboro, KY,
[[Page 54370]]
compared to Indianapolis and the East coast; safety of school children;
and employment-related reasons such as wanting to live in and work in
counties in the same time zone. Primary reasons given by those in favor
of the Eastern Time Zone include commerce and the quality of life. With
regard to commerce, commenters preferred the Eastern Time Zone because
Indianapolis, the state capital, and the majority of the State are on
the Eastern Time Zone, and the convenience of commerce would be better
served if businesses did not have to adjust for time zone differences.
With regard to the quality of life, commenters said it would be
improved by having more daylight in the evening to spend time with the
family or outdoors and because parents would have fewer problems with
their children's after school care and sporting events.
DOT notes that several individuals sent multiple submissions to the
docket, questioning information and data that were provided by the
Petitioning Counties. DOT recognized that the Petitioning Counties had
submitted information that needed to be clarified or corrected. DOT
raised these concerns in several letters to the Petitioning Counties
and, as a result, new information was submitted by the Petitioning
Counties to DOT. DOT wanted to ensure that the data we rely upon are
correct. We note, however, that the clarification of particular facts
may not be dispositive to DOT's determination that a time zone change
would serve the convenience of commerce standard. Therefore, in this
final rule, DOT broadly discusses the comments submitted as they relate
to the convenience of commerce standard, without necessarily addressing
specific factual issues raised by these comments.
Comments on Safety of the Children, Voting, and Personal Preferences
A substantial number of the commenters repeatedly raised safety of
the children, voting, and their personal preferences. Commenters who
said they preferred staying in the Central Time Zone relied upon
concerns about the safety of the children. On the other hand, both
opponents and proponents of time zone changes repeatedly noted that
they were ``voting'' for their time zone preference.
With regard to the safety of the children, some concerned parents
commented that, for safety reasons, their children should not have to
be standing at the bus stop on rural roads when it is still dark
outside and, therefore, urged DOT to deny the requests to move to the
Eastern Time Zone. Other concerned parents stated they preferred that
their children have an extra hour of daylight at the end of the day to
allow them to spend more time outdoors to get exercise and, therefore,
preferred the Eastern Time Zone.
Safety is the number one priority of the DOT and we are committed
to improving safety of school children. However, as DOT noted in the
January 2006 final rule, ``Laws exist to protect children getting on
and off school buses. If a bus stop is located in a dangerous place,
the Department continues to encourage individuals and local communities
to talk with the school office or transportation director about
changing the location.''
With regard to voting for personal preferences, a significant
number of comments to the docket were just a line or two stating, ``I
vote to keep the Petitioning Counties in the Central Time Zone,'' or
``I vote for the Eastern Time Zone,'' or ``My vote is for the same time
zone for the entire State of Indiana,'' or ``My husband and I vote for
Eastern Time.'' Many called for a public referendum on the issue.
DOT's decision whether to change the time zone boundary is not
based on the number of persons supporting a particular time zone.
Rather, as noted above, Congress adopted the statutory standard for
decisions to move an area from one time zone to another: ``regard for
the convenience of commerce and the existing junction points and
division points of common carriers engaged in interstate or foreign
commerce'' and the information provided by commenters helps us make
this decision. This standard is defined very broadly by DOT to include
consideration of all the impacts upon a community of a change in its
time zone. It is DOT's responsibility to consider requests for changes
in time zone boundaries in light of the statutory standard, bearing in
mind the need to address the effect on economic, cultural, social, and
civic activities within a county and between neighboring counties in
making decisions. The views or preferences of citizens, without regard
for the convenience of commerce, are not sufficient to support a time
zone change. Furthermore, with regard to comments requesting that DOT
move the entire State to the same time zone, DOT does not have a
statewide proposal before it nor has the Indiana legislature endorsed
such an approach. It is, therefore, beyond the scope of this proceeding
to consider such a significant change to the State's time zone
boundaries.
Comments Addressing the Request of the Petitioning Counties and the
Convenience of Commerce Standard
In addition to the general comments received on the proposed time
zone change for the Petitioning Counties, DOT also received specific
comments relating to the questions DOT considers when determining
whether to change a time zone boundary. These comments are summarized
below and were considered by DOT in determining the appropriate time
zone for the Petitioning Counties.
Community Imports and Exports
Large and small businesses commented in favor of both the Central
and the Eastern Time Zone depending on the location of their suppliers
and customers. However, those favoring the Eastern Time Zone also
referred to lost business implications due to the unavailability of
contacts at the beginning and end of the day and during lunchtime. For
example, the Martin County Board of Commissioners noted that both the
Martin County government and local businesses lost two hours a day.
They stated, ``There is a never-ending confusion with vendors and out
of the area contacts about the time to contact parties.''
In addition, one small business from Knox County commented that the
struggles of time zone differences with customers and suppliers make it
even more difficult to compete in a ``big business world'' and
applauded the efforts of the Petitioning Counties to work together to
move back to the Eastern Time Zone. Another small business from Dubois
County noted that the number of missed calls ``skyrocketed'' with the
change to the Central Time Zone. Other small retailers preferred the
Eastern Time Zone for the additional daylight at the end of the day for
shoppers. As for larger organizations, the Commanding Officer of the
Naval Service Warfare Center, Crane, (NSWC Crane) and Officer-in-
Charge, Naval Support Activity, Crane, (NSA Crane) described a negative
impact of the Central Time Zone on productivity.
Some individuals supporting the Central Time Zone questioned what
they referred to as the ``supposed four hour difference'' every
business day and stated that in a global economy, businesses regularly
``deal with it.'' In addition, a few commenters questioned whether the
Central Time Zone resulted in a negative impact on the productivity at
NSWC Crane and submitted some newspaper articles that highlight
contracts awarded across time zones.
[[Page 54371]]
Television and Radio Broadcasts
With regard to television and radio broadcasts, the President of
DCBroadcasting, a media company operating a community TV station and
several radio stations in Dubois County and adjoining counties, noted
that the company operated in both time the Central and Eastern Time
Zones. The only reason he gave for supporting the Eastern Time Zone was
that the Jasper, Huntingburg, and Ferdinand Chambers of Commerce, all
in Dubois County, supported the Eastern Time Zone.
Some individual commenters favoring the Central Time Zone noted
that the majority of the television and radio signals received by the
Petitioning Counties are from Evansville. One individual from Knox
County expressed concern about a change back to the Eastern Time Zone
because Knox County is ``tornado alley'' and radio stations
broadcasting reports from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration are from the Central Time Zone. Another Central Time
Zone supporter noted that Dubois County residents receive weather
watches and warnings from cities in the Central Time Zone.
Newspapers
Several individuals supporting the Central Time Zone noted that
each of the Petitioning Counties has its own newspapers and that all
have subscribers from the surrounding counties. In addition, these
commenters also pointed out that more residents of the Petitioning
Counties subscribe to the Evansville Courier & Press than to the
Indianapolis Star.
Bus and Passenger Rail Service
Commenters generally noted that residents are not regular bus or
rail passengers and that this question was irrelevant to this
proceeding. For example, the Martin County Board of Commissioners noted
in their comments to the docket that there is no passenger rail traffic
in Southwest Indiana and an anonymous commenter said the number of
persons who use these services is ``miniscule.'' On the other hand, an
individual from Knox County noted that the two closest passenger rail
stations are two cities in Illinois in the Central Time Zone.
Airports/Airline Services
With regard to airports/airline services, the Commanding Officer of
NSWC Crane and Officer-in-Charge, NSA Crane, noted that the travel
office processes 1200 to 1400 travel orders per month and that the main
airport used is the Indianapolis International Airport. He also claimed
that the time zone difference between the installation and the airport
has resulted in lost productivity. In addition, the Martin County Board
of Commissioners noted that ``the greatest majority of air passengers
utilize the major airports at Indianapolis and Louisville.'' With a
time difference, they explained that travelers would need to leave
Martin County by 2:30 or 3 a.m. to make a 7 a.m. flight or travel to
the airport the night before and incur additional expenses.
A Central Time Zone supporter attached an article from the
Evansville Courier and Press detailing the upcoming daily flights from
Evansville to Indianapolis. This commenter suggested that persons could
easily fly out of Evansville and connect in Indianapolis on their way
to a final destination.
Worker Commuting Patterns
The majority of workers in the Petitioning Counties live and work
in their home counties and the commuters do not have a large impact on
the overall workforce in most of the Petitioning Counties. In Martin
County, however, commuters make up 46.9% of the Martin County
workforce. In some organizations, the number of employees from another
county may even be greater. For example, NSWC Crane's Commanding
Officer and Officer-in-Charge, NSA, Crane, provided a list of personnel
and their home counties. He noted that 93% of NSWC Crane's 2643
employees and 65% of NSA Crane's 145 employees live in the Eastern Time
Zone. In addition, his data showed that there are 1494 support service
contract personnel and he surmised that they also lived predominantly
in the Eastern Time Zone.
Commenters from Martin County favoring the Central Time Zone
expressed concern about a focus on worker commuting patterns and said
that the time zone boundary for Martin County should focus on
preferences of the residents of Martin County. For example, one
commenter stated that the counties in the Eastern Time Zone surrounding
Martin County should petition for a time zone change to the Central
Time Zone in order to be in the same time zone as Martin County.
The Community's Economy/Economic Development
The Dubois County Area Development Corporation commented in support
of moving the Petitioning Counties to the Eastern Time Zone as did the
Pike County Growth and Development Council.
NSWC Crane, located primarily in Martin County with small portions
in Greene and Lawrence Counties, has one of the largest technical
workforces in Indiana and an annual operating budget of $1.7 billion,
with approximately 2500 employees and 1500 contract personnel. NSWC
Crane's Commanding Officer and Officer-in-Charge, NSA Crane, summed up
the benefits of a move to the Eastern Time Zone saying, ``It would
enhance the business climate for the regions, and enhance the
effectiveness of state and local efforts to diversify the economic base
of the region as well as the development of the WestGate@Crane
technology park.''
Some individuals questioned the information provided in the Joint
Petition and Supplemental Responses as related to NSWC Crane noting
that rescheduling and logistical problems have been worked out during
the months since the change in time zones. They also asserted that
companies should have tracked and reported on their losses that
resulted from a time zone change.
Schools, Recreation, Health Care, or Religious Worship
With regard to schooling, comments were submitted by school
superintendents, parents, and the President of, as well as a professor
of business and management from, Vincennes University. The
Superintendent of the North Daviess Community Schools reported that the
North Daviess Community School Board voted in favor of a return to the
Eastern Time Zone. The superintendent noted that he concurred with the
school board's vote and believes ``it is in the best interest of our
entire school community.'' In support of his position, the
Superintendent stated that 25% of the teaching staff lives in the
Eastern Time Zone, the entire athletic conference is in a different
time zone, and that choral and band festivals with neighboring schools
in different time zones have led ``to confusion for parents and
spectators.'' In addition, the Superintendent of Greater Jasper
Consolidated Schools in Dubois County supported a move to the Eastern
Time Zone. He stated that ``in order to have effective and timely
communication with regard to education issues, Greater Jasper
Consolidated School Corporation needs to be on the same time as the
Department of Education in the State of Indiana.'' The Superintendent
of the Shoals Community School Corporation, in Martin County, also
commented in favor of the Eastern Time Zone for staffing, school start
times, and class schedules.
[[Page 54372]]
With regard to post-secondary education, the President of Vincennes
University pointed out that students cross time zones daily and
commented in support of the Eastern Time Zone so that each of its
``campuses and sites could function consistently on the same time
zone.''
On the other hand, there were commenters who said that schooling
issues favored the Central Time Zone. For example, one commenter from
Dubois County noted that for post-secondary education, students in the
community go to colleges in the Central Time Zone. The Vincennes
University professor submitted a comment in favor of the Central Time
Zone for Knox County. His only reason was ``They have not been given
enough time to appreciate the change.'' An individual from Knox County
noted that the Joint Petition referred to ``one of the smallest public
school systems in Knox County'' in support of the Eastern Time Zone.
The commenter provided two tables listing football and basketball
schedules for the largest school corporation in Knox County to assert
that if Knox County remained in the Central Time Zone even if the other
Petitioning Counties were changed, there would be a higher percentage
of games played in the Central Time Zone.
With regard to recreation, the Martin County Board of Commissioners
noted the proximity of Martin County to Indiana University in Monroe
County and its cultural, sporting, and educational opportunities for
Martin County residents, and that residents could avail themselves to
these opportunities more easily if Martin County were in the Eastern
Time Zone. The Dubois County Tourism Commission also submitted a
comment supporting the Eastern Time Zone stating, ``We feel it is
crucial to operate on the same time zone as the majority of our state,
as well as our state capital, Indianapolis.'' In addition, the
Commission noted that two-thirds of the business and leisure travelers
to Dubois County travel from the north and east, areas that are in the
Eastern Time Zone.
With regard to health care, commenters expressed a time zone
preference based on the time zone of their health care provider. Some
gave no reason. For example, the Huntington Medical Association in
Dubois County submitted the following comment: ``Please leave us on
Central.'' Others supplied more explanation for their preference. For
example, an individual from Knox County said that health care is the
``number one industry'' in Knox County and that the majority of the
patients come from the Central Time Zone.
Regional Connections
Some commenters said that the Petitioning Counties should be
considered to be within the Evansville region. Others said that the
Petitioning Counties are more closely connected to counties in the
Eastern Time Zone. Yet the majority of commenters who mentioned
regional connections noted that the Petitioning Counties should be kept
together in the same time zone. However, one commenter from Knox County
provided information in an attempt to prove that Knox County ``has the
greatest case to stay on Central time,'' although he did say that he
believed all the counties should be left in the Central Time Zone.
DOT Determination With Regard to the Petitioning Counties
Based on the Joint Petition, the three Supplemental Responses, and
comments to the docket, DOT is relocating, for the convenience of
commerce, the Petitioning Counties, Knox, Daviess, Martin, Pike, and
Dubois Counties, from the Central Time Zone to the Eastern Time Zone.
We did not receive information or data that would persuade us to change
from our initial determination that the Petitioning Counties submitted
sufficient information to justify a proposal for a time zone change.
The totality of the information received by DOT supports a time zone
change for the convenience of commerce.
2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Concerning Perry County
Perry County is located in southwest Indiana, is contiguous to the
Petitioning Counties, and had its time zone changed at the same time as
the Petitioning Counties. Therefore, DOT asked for comments with regard
to Perry County in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning the
standard time zone boundary in Southwest Indiana published in the
Federal Register on July 19, 2007. (72 FR 39593). Under our normal
procedures, we do not take action unless a county makes a clear showing
that the proposed change of time zone would meet the statutory
standard. However, as we noted in our previous rulemaking on time zone
boundary changes in Indiana, this has been an unusual proceeding
because of the number of counties involved, their relationship to each
other and to other neighboring counties, and the circumstances leading
up to the petitions. DOT stated in the July 2007 Federal Register
notice, ``We also understand that this proposal may have an impact on
surrounding Counties, particularly Perry County which changed time zone
boundaries at the same time as the Petitioning Counties. * * * Our
decision in the final rule will be made on the basis of information and
comments developed during the entire rulemaking proceeding.''
At the time of the NPRM, DOT was unaware that, on June 1, 2007,
Perry County submitted a Petition (2007 Perry County Petition) (OST
2007-28746-654) for a time zone boundary change back to the Eastern
Time Zone, if DOT changed the time zone boundary of the Petitioning
Counties. DOT reviewed the 2007 Perry County Petition and the exhibits
attached to it. The 2007 Perry County Petition addressed all of the
factors that we consider in these proceedings. The 2007 Perry County
Petition provided information about time zone impacts on businesses,
workers, and the economy; transportation; radio, television, and the
print media; and schooling, healthcare, and recreation. In addition, it
included considerations of a time zone change on mail, safety, and
energy as well as the preferences of Perry County residents.
On July 31, 2007, DOT wrote to Perry County requesting additional
information to justify that changing Perry County back to the Eastern
Time Zone would serve the convenience of commerce. In addition, on
August 8, 2007, DOT provided notice of the 2007 Perry County Petition
in a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. (72 FR 44466). DOT
summarized the petition Perry County filed in support of its earlier
request to change to the Central Time Zone (the 2005 Perry County
Petition), the 2007 Perry County Petition, and DOT's questions on the
information submitted by Perry County. DOT sought comments on the
justification provided by Perry County and responsive information to
its questions.
On August 9, 2007, Perry County submitted a response (Perry County
Supplemental Submission) to DOT's letter requesting additional
information.
2005 and 2007 Perry County Petitions and Perry County Supplemental
Submission
Community Imports and Exports
The 2005 Perry County Petition to move from the Eastern Time Zone
to the Central Time Zone stated that the primary employers in the
county supply products to customers located throughout North America
although most of the customer base is located in
[[Page 54373]]
the United States, either in the Midwest or the South. In addition, it
noted that Perry County's newer employers are considered ``just-in-
time'' suppliers to the automotive industry which require a location
less than a day's distance from their respective customers.
In lieu of answering the question on community imports and exports
with an overview or analysis of the matter, the 2007 Perry County
Petition summarized and attached 16 letters from businesses, schools, a
hospital, and individuals. According to the 2007 Perry County Petition,
the letters express ``a desire to change to the Eastern Time Zone''
because business conducted on Eastern time and the difference in time
zones ``causes operating challenges on a daily basis.'' The 2007 Perry
County Petition noted that ``businesses in Perry County have in effect
lost four hours of each day that they can deal with customers and
suppliers from the Eastern Time Zone: One hour in the morning, two
hours at lunch, and one hour at the end of the day.'' In further
support of the Eastern Time Zone request, the 2007 Perry County
Petition specifically references three diverse businesses: The Southern
Indiana Rural Electric Cooperatives, which would be the only Hoosier
Energy Power Network out of 17 that would be in the Central Time Zone
and claims metering and billing problems; Kleeman Masonary, Inc, which
usually travels east in its construction business; and Perry County
Memorial Hospital, which has difficulties dealing with insurance
companies in the Eastern Time Zone.
While the 2007 Perry County Petition claimed the 16 letters
attached to it are from businesses and schools, DOT notes that two of
the letters were written on business letterhead and merely provided a
preference for a time zone without any justification. Another letter
stated that it is ``more cumbersome'' to be on a different time zone,
but provides no explanation. In contrast to the 16 letters, the 2007
Perry County Petition states that the Perry County Chamber of Commerce
has informed the Perry County Commissioners that ``there are 386 total
employers located in Perry County'' and that 41% of businesses have
expressed a preference for the Central Time Zone. The 2007 Perry County
Petition does not provide the reasons for the ``preference.''
In order to more clearly assess the impact of a time zone change on
businesses, DOT asked Perry County to provide an analysis of time zone
impacts on businesses in the county and the reasons for the time zone
preference expressed by Perry County businesses.
In response to DOT's request, the Perry County Supplemental
Submission stated, ``The Perry County Commissioners have no additional
analysis to submit; however attached hereto as Exhibit ``A'' is an
additional letter from a local business which expresses a preference
for Eastern Time Zone, and the reasons for the preference.''
Television and Radio Broadcasts
With regard to television broadcasts, the 2005 Perry County
Petition stated that the County was ``located within the Area of
Dominant Influence for the Evansville, Indiana television market.'' The
2005 Perry County Petition also stated that Perry County ``receives
cable and over-the-air broadcasts from the Louisville, Kentucky market
as well.'' The 2007 Perry County Petition made the same statements
concerning television broadcasts.
With regard to radio broadcasts, the 2005 Perry County Petition
stated that the ``majority of the stations serving Perry County are
located either in the Central Daylight Saving or Eastern Standard time
zones.'' The 2007 Perry County Petition elaborated on the previous
petition by providing a list of AM and FM radio signals for five cities
within the County based on information from radio-locator.com. As the
2007 Perry County Petition noted, residents in the northern part of the
County primarily receive radio signals from the Eastern Time Zone while
residents in the southern part of the County receive radio signals from
the Central Time Zone. While the 2007 Perry County Petition provides
radio signal information for five cities, it did not provide any
information about the population of those cities.
In order to assess the impact of a time zone change on television
and radio broadcasts, DOT asked Perry County for population data for
Bristow, Cannelton, Leopold, St. Croix, and Tell City, the localities
referred to in the 2007 Perry County Petition. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission provided the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau statistics
for Tell City and Cannelton and the U.S. Census Bureau American Fact
Finder reports for the other cities. According to this submission, the
city or town and its population are: Tell City--12,094; Cannelton--
2968; Bristow--1111; Leopold--568; and St. Croix--462. As noted in the
2007 Perry County Petition, the population of Perry County is in excess
of 18,000. The majority of Perry County's residents live in Tell City
and Cannelton, in the southern part of the County which receives its
radio signals from the Central Time Zone.
Newspapers
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated, ``The primary daily
newspaper that serves Perry County is the Evansville Courier & Press''
in the Central Time Zone and that the local county newspaper, which
publishes editions twice per week, also operates a printing plant that
prints weekly newspapers for two Central Time Zone communities. On the
other hand, the 2005 Perry County Petition also noted that the
Louisville Courier & Journal, from the Eastern Time Zone, maintains
drop boxes for the Sunday edition at several area convenience stores.
Daily service, however, is unavailable.
The 2007 Perry County Petition provided more detailed information
on newspaper use within the County. The 2007 Perry County Petition
asserted that Perry County residents ``primarily'' receive their news
from the local newspaper, The Perry County News, which is published
twice a week. Furthermore, according to the 2007 Perry County Petition,
there are 1,901 weekday subscriptions and 2,271 Sunday subscriptions
for the Evansville Courier & Press. While this is consistent with Perry
County's original request for the Central Time Zone, the 2007 Perry
County Petition claimed that the subscriptions support the Eastern Time
Zone because the population base is in excess of 18,000. The 2007 Perry
County Petition also noted that the Indianapolis Star has a very small
circulation in the County; and, that the Louisville Courier-Journal has
no daily subscriptions in the County.
With regard to newspaper publishing, DOT asked Perry County for the
number of subscriptions of The Perry County News and the Indianapolis
Star; the total number of households in Perry County; whether the
residents of Perry County receive any newspapers from Daviess, Dubois,
Knox, Martin, or Pike Counties and; if residents do receive newspaper
from these counties, the circulation numbers of those newspapers within
Perry County.
The Perry County Supplemental Submission stated that there are 7270
households in Perry County and that the total circulation and street
sales for the Perry County News are 5625. The Perry County Supplemental
Submission also corrected the circulations for two newspapers included
in the 2007 Perry County Petition. While the 2007 Perry County Petition
claimed that ``the Indianapolis Star has a very small circulation in
the County,'' according to the Perry County Supplemental Response, the
circulation is zero. With regard to the Louisville Courier-Journal,
[[Page 54374]]
the 2007 Perry County Petition claimed there were ``no daily
subscriptions in the County.'' According to the Perry County
Supplemental Response, however, the Louisville Courier-Journal
distributes seven daily and thirteen Sunday newspapers in Perry County.
As for other newspapers, the Perry County Supplemental Response stated
that the Jasper Dubois County Herald reports 40 mail subscribers in
Perry County, but did not provide any information with regard to
newspaper subscriptions for Daviess, Knox, Martin, or Pike County
newspapers.
Bus and Passenger Rail Service
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated that there are no bus or
passenger rail services in the community. The 2007 Perry County
Petition explained bus service in more detail, contrasting bus service
provided in Evansville and Louisville, and freight rail services. The
2007 Perry County Petition noted that Evansville is approximately 50
miles away and offers services to western and southern routes. In
contrast, Louisville is approximately 75 miles away and offers service
to the north, northeast, and south. As for rail service, although DOT
requested information on passenger rail service, the 2007 Perry County
Petition referred only to freight rail service that carries goods
through several southern Indiana counties.
Airports/Airline Services
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated that the nearest airport is
in Evansville, IN, located in the Central Time Zone, approximately 55
miles from Perry County. The 2005 Perry County Petition also noted that
that there is an airport in Louisville, KY, in the Eastern Time Zone,
75 miles from Perry County. The 2007 Perry County Petition reiterated
the same information with regard to airport location and supplemented
it by referring to the number of departures and destinations and the
impact of early morning flights on travelers. According to the 2007
Perry County Petition, the Evansville Regional Airport has,
approximately, only 35 daily departures in contrast to Louisville
International Airport which offers daily departures to ``around 140
domestic destinations plus 53 international destinations.'' The 2007
Perry County Petition also noted that because Louisville International
Airport is in the Eastern Time Zone, it is ``extremely difficult'' to
take early morning flights unless travelers spend the night at or near
the airport.
Worker Commuting Patterns
The 2005 Perry County Petition stated that 3,267 persons, or 26% of
its total workforce, reside in Perry County but work outside of the
County. Of the top five areas to which Perry County residents commute
for work, four were in the Central Time Zone and, the fifth, Dubois
County, was at that time requesting to be located in the Central Time
Zone. (Dubois County is now requesting to be moved back to the Eastern
Time Zone.) A STATS Indiana Annual Commuting Trends Profile based on
Indiana IT-40 Returns for Tax Year 2003 was attached to the 2005 Perry
County Petition.
The 2007 Perry County Petition also referred to the Perry County
workforce. The actual numbers provided differ from the earlier
submission because they are from STATS Indiana Annual Commuting Trends
Profile based on Indiana IT-40 Returns for Tax Year 2005. Nevertheless,
the percentage of the workforce that leaves the County did not change;
it remains 26%.
The Community's Economy/Economic Development
The 2005 Perry County Petition discussed the major elements of the
community's economy, the improvement in the County's economy, and
efforts to ensure that the local economy continues to improve. The 2005
Perry County Petition noted ``a dramatic shift from traditional
woodworking industries to a significant transportation cluster.'' It
stated that the ``primary employers manufacture products for the
automotive, heavy truck, and aerospace industries.'' The 2005 Perry
County Petition also referred to a regional rural hospital and noted
the planning and infrastructure the County put in place to support
future economic growth and its partnerships to enhance growth.
The 2007 Perry County Petition's answer to the question on the
community's economy is nearly identical to the 2005 Perry County
Petition. There is only one change. The 2007 Perry County Petition
eliminated, in this response, reference to ``a regional rural hospital
which serves counties in Southern Indiana and Western Kentucky, located
in the Central time zone.'' However, it included the reference to the
hospital in response to the question concerning health care.
In order to assess the impact of a time zone change on the
community's economy, DOT asked Perry County to identify whether Perry
County has entered into economic partnerships with Daviess, Dubois,
Knox, Martin, or Pike Counties or other Counties in southern Indiana
and, if it has entered into partnerships, the nature of these
partnerships and how a time zone change would affect them.
The Perry County Supplemental Submission stated that Perry County
is a member of both the Indiana 15 Regional Planning Commission and the
Southwest Indiana Development Council. The Perry County Supplemental
Submission noted that if both the Joint Petition and the 2007 Perry
County petition result in a time zone change for the 6 Southwestern
Indiana Counties they cover, the change would impact the Indiana 15
Regional Planning Commission and the Southwest Indiana Development
Council by reducing the number of Counties in the Central Time Zone.
Schools, Recreation, Health Care, or Religious Worship
With regard to schools, the 2005 Perry County Petition emphasized
post-secondary education. While the 2005 Perry County Petition
recognized that Perry County residents attend post-secondary schools in
the Eastern and Central Time Zones, it noted that more Perry County
residents go to the University of Southern Indiana in the Central Time
Zone than any other school.
The 2007 Perry County Petition shifted the focus from post-
secondary education to the high school level. It noted that no Perry
County school districts are in more than one time zone, but said that
the schools cross time zones to participate in sporting events.
Exhibits 10 through 14 to the 2007 Perry County Petition provided
information on the athletic conferences in southern Indiana, and the
schedules for basketball, volleyball, football, cross country,
baseball, and softball. The 2007 Perry County Petition asserted that
playing games in different time zones ``causes extreme complications
with scheduling and arrival and departure times for the schools.''
The 2005 Perry County Petition did not address recreation or
whether County residents left the County to pursue recreational
interests. The 2007 Perry County Petition, however, stated, ``Perry
County prides itself on its outdoor recreational activities including
the vast amounts of Hoosier National Forest and ready access to the
Ohio River for recreation such as boating, fishing and hunting.'' The
2007 Perry County Petition also referred to recreational softball,
baseball, and soccer leagues that could play later into the evening if
the County were located in the Eastern Time Zone.
In order to assess the impact of a time zone change on recreation,
DOT requested information on whether
[[Page 54375]]
residents leave Perry County for recreation and the standard of time
observed in the places where they go for this purpose. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission stated, ``Perry County was unable to locate any
statistics concerning what percentage of residents leave the county for
recreation.''
With regard to health care, the 2005 Perry County Petition noted
that Perry County is ``home to a regional rural hospital.'' It also
noted that residents ``primarily travel to Evansville and Jasper,
Indiana'' to purchase health services. Like the 2005 Perry County
Petition, the 2007 Perry County Petition also noted the regional
hospital and refers to a letter from Perry County Memorial Hospital.
The letter stated that the hospital conducts ``a lot of business with
our State Capitol in Indianapolis'' and that ``the large insurance
companies'' that it does business with are also located there.
While the letter from Perry County Memorial Hospital provides
business reasons for an Eastern Time Zone preference, it does not
address the impact of the current time zone on Perry County residents
and whether they are referred to health care providers in other time
zones. Therefore, in order to assess the impact of a time zone change
on health care, DOT requested information on the number of patients
referred from Perry County to health care providers in Evansville,
Jasper, Indianapolis, and Louisville. The Perry County Supplemental
Submission provided information concerning the patients transferred
from Perry County Memorial Hospital in 2006. According to the Perry
County Memorial Hospital transfer information, 728 out of 838 patients
in 2006 were transferred to hospitals in the Central Time Zone. Two of
these Central Time Zone hospitals are in Evansville, IN, and the other
is located in Owensboro, KY.
Neither the 2005 Perry County Petition nor the 2007 Perry County
Petition addressed religious worship and DOT had no additional
questions concerning this issue.
Regional Connections
In the original rulemaking proceeding to change time zone
boundaries from the Eastern Time Zone to the Central Time Zone, the
Petitioning Counties, Perry County, and commenters advocated for a move
by referring to their ties to other Indiana counties currently in the
Central Time Zone. DOT carefully reviewed this data and utilized it in
reaching its decision. DOT recognized the importance of regional
connections and the benefits of similar time zones and regional ties
among counties. As described in the summary of the hearings and
comments to the docket in DOT's January 2006 Final Rule, the
Southwestern Counties have strong regional ties to each other and
Central Time Zone Counties. DOT stated, ``While Daviess, Dubois, Knox,
Martin, and Perry border other Indiana counties in the Eastern Time
Zone, their ties to those counties is not as strong as they are to each
other and to other counties to their south, which are currently in the
Central Time Zone. Along with Pike, these counties are located in the
same workforce, commerce, transportation, and education regions
designated by Indiana. Remaining in the same time zone and maintaining
their regional ties better position counties to realize advantages in
economic, cultural, social, and civic activities, thereby serving the
convenience of commerce.''
The 2007 Perry County Petition addressed regional connections by
noting that at DOT's hearing on time zones in November 2005, ``Perry
County representatives stated that one of the reasons for the requested
change was the fact that Dubois County was also petitioning to be
placed in the Central Time Zone.'' The 2007 Perry County Petition also
noted that five other counties in the area petitioned for a time zone
change back to the Eastern Time Zone.
DOT asked Perry County to address the regional connectivity of
Perry County with other counties in southern Indiana, including those
that have and have not petitioned for a time zone change and how a time
zone change would affect regional connections. The Perry County
Supplemental Submission stated, ``Perry County has no additional
information to submit in this response.''
Comments Addressing Perry County's Request
In addition to general comments received on the proposed time zone
change for the Petitioning Counties and Perry County's request for a
time zone change, DOT also received specific comments on the 2007 Perry
County Petition. In general, Perry County individuals and businesses
commented in support of a change to the Eastern Time Zone and also in
favor of staying in the Central Time Zone. Businesses supporting the
Eastern Time Zone referred to the general impact of lost ability to
work with customers and suppliers. Some were more specific, referring
to the actual impact on their business. For example, one trucking and
excavating company referred to dealing with an Indiana county to the
east that is located in the Eastern Time Zone. Because of this specific
relationship, the owner supported the Eastern Time Zone for the County.
Other commenters referred to the Petitioning Counties and said if the
five other Counties were going to change time zones, Perry County
should too.
Those preferring the Central Time Zone also expressed both general
and specific reasons to remain in the Central Time Zone. Commenters
noted that nothing has changed in Perry County since the 2005 Perry
County Petition and that Central Time is working for them personally
and for their businesses. One commenter responded to the assertion that
Perry County should change time zones because the five other Counties
were changing by quoting his mother saying, ``if the other person jumps
off of a bridge it does not mean that you have to jump too.'' The
overwhelming majority of commenters concerning the time zone boundary
for Perry County based their choice on personal preferences.
There were comments with regard to the specific aspects of the
convenience of commerce standard. While many assertions were made
generally, there are a few that are worth noting. With regard to health
care, commenters asserted that Perry County residents go to Owensboro,
KY, to visit health care professionals. For example, one commenter
expressed concern that DOT did not specifically request information
about Owensboro and noted that a ``GREAT NUMBER'' of Perry County
residents travel to Owensboro for doctor's appointments, hospital
visits, outpatient surgery, and children's orthodontist appointments.
With regard to the education aspect of the convenience of commerce
standard, the Superintendent of Cannelton City Schools commented on
behalf of the Board of School Trustees. The Superintendent requested
that Perry County remain on Central Time based on safety concerns of
the students.
DOT Deter