Record of Decision for the Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Wilderness Stewardship Plan for Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge in Pima and Yuma Counties, AZ, 54281-54283 [07-4715]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 184 / Monday, September 24, 2007 / Notices
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
comment letters with the names and
addresses of the individuals who wrote
them. However, to the extent
permissible by law, we will not provide
the telephone numbers of those
individuals.
Supawna Meadows NWR
Supawna Meadows NWR currently
includes more than 3,000 acres of
marsh, grassland, shrubland, and forest
habitats. The approved refuge
acquisition boundary encompasses
4,500 acres along the Upper Delaware
Bay and Salem River in Pennsville
Township, New Jersey. The refuge
boundaries are defined by the Delaware
Bay, Salem River, and Fort Mott Road.
Supawna Meadows NWR was
originally established as the Goose Pond
addition to the Killcohook NWR
(currently termed Killcohook Dredge
Spoil Disposal Area), which was
established by Executive Order 6582 on
February 3, 1934. The refuge was
renamed Supawna Meadows NWR and
officially separated from Killcohook on
April 10, 1974, by the Service. On
October 30, 1998, the Service’s
jurisdiction over Killcohook was
revoked.
Supawna Meadows NWR was
established as a ‘‘* * *refuge and
breeding ground for wild birds and
animals;’’ ‘‘* * *for particular value in
carrying out the national migratory bird
management program;’’ ‘‘* * *for use
as an inviolate sanctuary, or for any
other management purpose, for
migratory birds;’’ and as a refuge
‘‘* * *suitable for (1) incidental fish
and wildlife-oriented recreational
development, (2) the protection of
natural resources, (3) the conservation
of endangered species or threatened
species* * *’’
The refuge is located in the Atlantic
Flyway, where birds migrating from
interior Canada and the coastal
Provinces merge to form the main stem
of the flyway. The area not only serves
as an important migration area, but also
provides wintering habitat for large
numbers of waterfowl. Recent
midwinter waterfowl inventory flights
for the Salem River watershed averaged
more than 2,000 dabbling ducks and
more than 17,000 Canada geese.
Supawna Meadows NWR provides
critical foraging habitat for more than
6,000 pairs of 9 species of wading birds
that nest on Pea Patch Island, one of the
largest rookeries on the east coast. Pea
Patch Island and the surrounding area,
including the refuge, have been
designated a Special Management Area
by the States of New Jersey and
Delaware, in accordance with the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:43 Sep 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
Supawna Meadows NWR receives
significant use by shorebirds during
both spring and fall migrations. The
refuge and adjacent marshes are
currently being investigated for
potential inclusion in the Western
Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve
Network. It also provides habitat for the
bald eagle, as well as State-listed
endangered and threatened species and
species of conservation concern.
A maternity colony of more than
1,500 bats, primarily the little brown
bat, roosts in a dilapidated barn on the
refuge. The federally endangered
Indiana bat is known to form small
colonies within large little brown bat
colonies. Indiana bats have been
documented within the Highlands
region of New Jersey, but little survey
work has taken place within the
southern portion of the State, and it is
not yet known if the species is present
within the Coastal Plain.
Reptile and amphibian species of
conservation concern at Supawna
Meadows NWR include northern
diamondback terrapin, eastern box
turtle, spotted turtle, and Fowler’s toad.
The predominant public uses of the
refuge are hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation and photography. There are
two walking trails and one boating trail
to facilitate those uses. Portions of the
refuge are open to deer hunting and
waterfowl hunting per State regulations.
There is an historic lighthouse on the
refuge, the Finns Point Rear Range
Light, which draws a number of visitors.
Dated: September 18, 2007.
Thomas J. Healy,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E7–18740 Filed 9–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Record of Decision for the Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan,
Wilderness Stewardship Plan for
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge
in Pima and Yuma Counties, AZ
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of record
of decision.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce our decision
and availability of the Record of
Decision (ROD) for the Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP), Wilderness Stewardship Plan
(WSP) and Environmental Impact
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54281
Statement (EIS) for Cabeza Prieta
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements.
ADDRESSES: The ROD and Final CCP/
WSP/EIS may be viewed at Cabeza
Prieta National Wildlife Refuge
Headquarters at 1611 North Second
Street, Ajo, Arizona 85321. You may
obtain a copy of the ROD at the
Planning Division Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/southwest/refuges/Plan/
completeplans.html or by writing to the
following address: U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, National Wildlife
Refuge System, Southwest Region,
Planning Division, P.O. Box 1306,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Slown at (505) 248–7458 or e-mail:
john_slown@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
announce our decision and availability
of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP), Wilderness Stewardship Plan
(WSP) and Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for Cabeza Prieta
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in
accordance with 40 CFR 1506.6(b). We
completed a thorough analysis of the
environmental, social, and economic
considerations, which we included in
the Final CCP/WSP/EIS. We released
the Final CCP/WSP/EIS to the public
and published a Notice of Availability
in the Federal Register (72 FR, 20132–
20133, April 23, 2007). The ROD
documents the selection of Alternative
D, the Preferred Alternative in the Final
CCP/WSP/EIS. The ROD was signed by
the Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, on
July 19, 2007. The CCP/WSP/EIS for the
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge
will provide management guidance for
conservation of Refuge resources and
public use activities during the next 15
years. Five alternatives and their
consequences were described in detail
in the Draft and Final Environmental
Impact Statements. Under all
alternatives the recovery plan for the
Sonoran pronghorn would be
implemented, wilderness resources
would be protected and the Refuge
would work cooperatively with the
Department of Homeland Security,
Customs and Border Patrol, to protect
Sonoran Desert resources while securing
the Nation’s border.
Alternative 1—No Action. No change
from present management practices. The
No Action alternative is a status quo
scenario in which current conditions
and trends would continue. This
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
54282
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 184 / Monday, September 24, 2007 / Notices
alternative served as the baseline to
compare and contrast with the other
alternatives. Under existing conditions
the Refuge would continue to offer a
limited desert bighorn sheep hunt each
year in cooperation with the Arizona
Game and Fish Department. Refuge staff
would continue to maintain and supply
supplemental water to existing
developed waters in desert bighorn
sheep habitat.
Alternative 2—Minimum Intervention.
Under this alternative the primary focus
of Refuge management is avoidance or
limitation of management interventions
within Refuge wilderness. Under this
alternative, developed wildlife waters in
sheep habitat within the Refuge
wilderness would not be maintained or
supplied with supplemental water.
Sonoran pronghorn recovery activities
would continue to be implemented, but
any new developed waters, forage
enhancements or radio collaring capture
operations would be restricted to the
refuge non-wilderness.
The desert bighorn sheep hunt would
also be discontinued. The use of horses
by Refuge visitors would be prohibited,
visitor party size would be limited to
eight individuals and the maximum
length of stay would be limited to seven
(7) consecutive days. Collecting
firewood on the Refuge would be
prohibited. Only one vehicle-accessible
developed campsite would be retained.
Alternative 3—Restrained
Intervention. The theme of this
alternative is increased levels of active
habitat and wildlife management above
that of Alternative 2, with management
activities focused on the non-wilderness
portion of the Refuge. Under this
alternative, the Refuge would supply
supplemental water to developed waters
in sheep habitat within Refuge
wilderness only during periods of
severe drought. Sonoran pronghorn
recovery activities would continue to be
implemented, but any new developed
waters, forage enhancements or radio
collaring capture operations would be
restricted to the Refuge non-wilderness.
The desert bighorn sheep hunt would
be continued, but no hunting would be
allowed during years of severe drought.
The use of horses by Refuge visitors
would be allowed subject to special use
permit. Visitor party size would be
limited to eight individuals and the
maximum length of stay would be seven
(7) consecutive days. Collecting
firewood on the Refuge would be
prohibited. Only one vehicle-accesible
developed campsite would be retained.
Alternative 4—Active Management
(the Service’s Preferred Alternative). The
theme of this alternative is active
intervention, as justifiable, throughout
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:43 Sep 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Refuge to recover the Sonoran
pronghorn and maintain a target
population level for the Refuge’s desert
bighorn sheep.
Under this alternative, maintenance
and water supply to existing developed
waters in sheep habitat within Refuge
wilderness would continue and projects
to increase the water collection
efficiency of such waters would be
implemented. Sonoran pronghorn
recovery activities and developments
would occur wherever determined best
suited for species recovery, subject to
minimum requirements analysis in
wilderness.
The Refuge desert bighorn sheep hunt
program would continue unchanged
under this alternative. The use of horses
by Refuge visitors would be allowed
subject to special use permit. Visitor
party size would be limited to eight
individuals or four vehicles and the
maximum length of stay would be
fourteen (14) consecutive days.
Collecting dead and down firewood
would be allowed for visitors traveling
in the Refuge backcountry (hiking away
from the access roads). Three existing
vehicle-accessible developed campsites
would be retained.
Alternative 5—Maximum Effort. This
alternative focuses on maximizing both
the provision of visitor services and
Refuge population levels of desert
bighorn sheep. Under this alternative all
existing developed waters in Refuge
wilderness would be maintained and
supplied with water, and new
developed waters would be created. In
addition to developed waters, the
Refuge would develop forage
enhancements in suitable areas of desert
bighorn sheep habitat to provide forage
for a larger desert bighorn sheep
population.
The desert bighorn sheep hunt
program would continue unchanged
under this alternative. Horses would be
allowed on the Refuge for visitors,
restrictions of collection of firewood
would be eliminated and two additional
developed campsites would be
developed along the non-wilderness
access roads. No visitor party size
limitations would be imposed, and the
maximum length of stay would be
fourteen (14) consecutive days.
We have selected Alternative 4, the
Preferred Alternative, for
implementation at the Refuge.
Alternative 4 addresses the key issues
identified during the planning process
and will best achieve the purposes and
goals of the Refuge as well as the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System. This decision includes
adoption of Comprehensive
Conservation Plan Chapters (Appendix
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
M of the Final CCP/WSP/EIS).
Implementation of the CCP will occur
over the next 15 years and will depend
on future staffing levels and funding.
The Service’s Basis for the Decision:
Based on a review of the environmental
consequences of each alternative, we
judged Alternative 4 to be the
environmentally preferable alternative.
Alternative 4 is also expected to lead to
more overall public support and a more
appropriate level of public use
opportunities than the other
alternatives. Alternative 1 was not
considered for selection as it describes
current management and was presented
primarily as a baseline against which to
compare the proposed alternatives.
Alternatives 2 and 3 were not selected
primarily because their spatial
restrictions of management activity
would likely lead to inefficient and suboptimal sampling and recovery
implementation for the Sonoran
pronghorn. Alternative 5 was not
selected because its level of
management intervention within
wilderness to manage a larger
population of desert bighorn sheep on
the Refuge would create excessive
impacts to wilderness character. The
increased levels of public use
anticipated under Alternative 5 and the
absence of any restrictions on firewood
collection, visitor horse use and visitor
party size would likely create localized
adverse impacts to habitat and wildlife
populations.
The rationale for choosing the
selected alternative as the best
alternative for the CCP/WSP/EIS is
based on the impact of this alternative
on the issues and concerns that surfaced
during the planning process. Because all
practicable means to avoid or minimize
environmental harm have been
incorporated into the preferred
alternative, no mitigation measures have
been identified.
Public Comments on Final CCP/WSP/
EIS: During the 30-day waiting period,
we received three written comments.
The comments did not raise any issues
not addressed in the Final CCP/WSP/
EIS, and the comments did not result in
changes to the analysis of
environmental consequences or affect
our response to similar comments in the
Final EIS. All written comments
received during the 30-day waiting
period are available for review at the
Refuge headquarters in Ajo, Arizona
(see ADDRESSES).
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 184 / Monday, September 24, 2007 / Notices
Dated: July 19, 2007.
Benjamin N. Tuggle,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 07–4715 Filed 9–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT–090–06–1220–PM]
Revision of Recreation Use
Restrictions for Indian Creek Canyon
Corridor: Off-Highway Vehicle Use
Restrictions
Department of Interior, Bureau
of Land Management.
ACTION: Notice of OHV use restrictions.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that,
effective immediately, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), Monticello
Field Office, is restricting off-highway
vehicle (OHV) travel to existing roads
and trails on approximately 100,000
acres of public lands in the Indian Creek
Canyon area near Monticello, UT. The
public lands affected by this restriction
are located in portions of T. 29 S., R.
19–21 E; T. 30 S., R. 19–22 E.; T. 31 S.,
R. 20–22 E; T. 32 S., R. 20–22 E. The
Indian Creek Management boundary is
depicted on the attached map. The
purpose of this restriction is to protect
riparian, soils, riparian, vegetation,
visual and cultural resources that have
been adversely impacted, or are at risk
of being adversely impacted by crosscountry OHV travel.
The restriction will remain in effect
until the Monticello Resource
Management Plan Revision is
completed.
Nick
Sandberg, Acting Field Office Manager,
Monticello Field Office, Bureau of Land
Management, P.O. Box 7, Monticello,
Utah, 84535; (435) 587–1500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BLM is
implementing this action on
approximately 100,000 acres of public
land in the Indian Creek Corridor area
in San Juan County, which is located in
southeast Utah. BLM’s Monticello Field
Office has observed and documented
considerable adverse effects from crosscountry OHV use in this area to soils,
riparian, vegetation, visual and cultural
resources. Based on this information,
BLM’s authorized officer has
determined that cross-country OHV use
in this area is causing, or will cause,
considerable adverse effects upon soils,
riparian, vegetation, visual and cultural
resources. Consequently, OHV travel in
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:43 Sep 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
this area is being limited to existing
roads and trails. A map showing the
restriction area is available for public
inspection at the BLM’s Monticello
Field Office, at the above address. OHV
use on the remainder of the public lands
in San Juan County, Utah administered
by BLM will be managed according to
existing Federal Register orders and the
1991 San Juan Resource Area Resource
Management Plan.
This restriction order does not apply
to:
(1) Any federal, state or local
government law enforcement officer
engaged in enforcing this closure order
or member of an organized rescue or fire
fighting force while in the performance
of an official duty.
(2) Any Bureau of Land Management
employee, agent, contractor, or
cooperator while in the performance of
an official duty.
This order shall not be construed as
a limitation on BLM’s future planning
efforts and/or management of OHV use
on the public lands. BLM will
periodically monitor resource
conditions and rends in the restriction
area and may modify this order or
implement additional limitations or
closures as necessary.
The authority for this order is 43 CFR
8342.1.
Dated: September 14, 2007.
Sherwin N. Sandberg,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. E7–18621 Filed 9–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a reinstatement of an
information collection (1010–0082).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: To comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), MMS is inviting comments on a
collection of information that we will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
The information collection request (ICR)
concerns the paperwork requirements in
the regulations under 30 CFR 281,
Leasing for Minerals Other than Oil, Gas
and Sulphur in the Outer Continental
Shelf.
Submit written comments by
November 23, 2007.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54283
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods listed
below. Please use the Information
Collection Number 1010–0082 as an
identifier in your message.
• E-mail MMS at
rules.comments@mms.gov. Identify with
Information Collection Number 1010–
0082 in the subject line.
• Fax: 703–787–1093. Identify with
Information Collection Number 1010–
0082.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention: Cheryl
Blundon; 381 Elden Street, MS–4024;
Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817. Please
reference ‘‘Information Collection 1010–
0082’’ in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Blundon, Regulations and
Standards Branch at (703) 787–1607.
You may also contact Cheryl Blundon to
obtain a copy, at no cost, of the
regulations that require the subject
collection of information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: 30
CFR Part 281, Leasing for Minerals
Other than Oil, Gas, and Sulphur in the
Outer Continental Shelf.
OMB Control Number: 1010–0082.
Abstract: Section 8(k) of the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act, as
amended (43 U.S.C. 1337), authorizes
the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary)
to grant to the qualified persons offering
the highest cash bonuses on a basis of
competitive bidding leases of any
mineral other than oil, gas, and sulphur.
This applies to any area of the Outer
Continental Shelf not then under lease
for such mineral upon such royalty,
rental, and other terms and conditions
as the Secretary may prescribe at the
time of offering the area for lease. The
Secretary is to administer the leasing
provisions of the Act and prescribe the
rule and regulations necessary to carry
out those provisions.
Regulations at 30 CFR Part 281
implement these statutory requirements.
However, there has been no activity in
the OCS for minerals other than oil, gas,
and sulphur for many years and no
information collected since we allowed
the OMB approval to expire in 1991.
Nevertheless, because these are
regulatory requirements, the potential
exists for information to be collected
and we are requesting that OMB
reinstate this collection of information.
We use the information required by
30 CFR Part 281 to determine if
statutory requirements are met prior to
the issuance of a lease. Specifically,
MMS uses the information to:
• Evaluate the area and minerals
requested by the lessee to assess the
viability of offering leases for sale.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 184 (Monday, September 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54281-54283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4715]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Record of Decision for the Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan,
Wilderness Stewardship Plan for Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge
in Pima and Yuma Counties, AZ
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce our decision
and availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP), Wilderness Stewardship Plan
(WSP) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Cabeza Prieta
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements.
ADDRESSES: The ROD and Final CCP/WSP/EIS may be viewed at Cabeza Prieta
National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters at 1611 North Second Street, Ajo,
Arizona 85321. You may obtain a copy of the ROD at the Planning
Division Web site at https://www.fws.gov/southwest/refuges/Plan/
completeplans.html or by writing to the following address: U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge System, Southwest
Region, Planning Division, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico
87103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Slown at (505) 248-7458 or e-
mail: john_slown@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
announce our decision and availability of the Record of Decision (ROD)
for the Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP), Wilderness
Stewardship Plan (WSP) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in accordance with 40 CFR
1506.6(b). We completed a thorough analysis of the environmental,
social, and economic considerations, which we included in the Final
CCP/WSP/EIS. We released the Final CCP/WSP/EIS to the public and
published a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register (72 FR,
20132-20133, April 23, 2007). The ROD documents the selection of
Alternative D, the Preferred Alternative in the Final CCP/WSP/EIS. The
ROD was signed by the Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Southwest Region, on July 19, 2007. The CCP/WSP/EIS for the
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge will provide management guidance
for conservation of Refuge resources and public use activities during
the next 15 years. Five alternatives and their consequences were
described in detail in the Draft and Final Environmental Impact
Statements. Under all alternatives the recovery plan for the Sonoran
pronghorn would be implemented, wilderness resources would be protected
and the Refuge would work cooperatively with the Department of Homeland
Security, Customs and Border Patrol, to protect Sonoran Desert
resources while securing the Nation's border.
Alternative 1--No Action. No change from present management
practices. The No Action alternative is a status quo scenario in which
current conditions and trends would continue. This
[[Page 54282]]
alternative served as the baseline to compare and contrast with the
other alternatives. Under existing conditions the Refuge would continue
to offer a limited desert bighorn sheep hunt each year in cooperation
with the Arizona Game and Fish Department. Refuge staff would continue
to maintain and supply supplemental water to existing developed waters
in desert bighorn sheep habitat.
Alternative 2--Minimum Intervention. Under this alternative the
primary focus of Refuge management is avoidance or limitation of
management interventions within Refuge wilderness. Under this
alternative, developed wildlife waters in sheep habitat within the
Refuge wilderness would not be maintained or supplied with supplemental
water. Sonoran pronghorn recovery activities would continue to be
implemented, but any new developed waters, forage enhancements or radio
collaring capture operations would be restricted to the refuge non-
wilderness.
The desert bighorn sheep hunt would also be discontinued. The use
of horses by Refuge visitors would be prohibited, visitor party size
would be limited to eight individuals and the maximum length of stay
would be limited to seven (7) consecutive days. Collecting firewood on
the Refuge would be prohibited. Only one vehicle-accessible developed
campsite would be retained.
Alternative 3--Restrained Intervention. The theme of this
alternative is increased levels of active habitat and wildlife
management above that of Alternative 2, with management activities
focused on the non-wilderness portion of the Refuge. Under this
alternative, the Refuge would supply supplemental water to developed
waters in sheep habitat within Refuge wilderness only during periods of
severe drought. Sonoran pronghorn recovery activities would continue to
be implemented, but any new developed waters, forage enhancements or
radio collaring capture operations would be restricted to the Refuge
non-wilderness.
The desert bighorn sheep hunt would be continued, but no hunting
would be allowed during years of severe drought. The use of horses by
Refuge visitors would be allowed subject to special use permit. Visitor
party size would be limited to eight individuals and the maximum length
of stay would be seven (7) consecutive days. Collecting firewood on the
Refuge would be prohibited. Only one vehicle-accesible developed
campsite would be retained.
Alternative 4--Active Management (the Service's Preferred
Alternative). The theme of this alternative is active intervention, as
justifiable, throughout the Refuge to recover the Sonoran pronghorn and
maintain a target population level for the Refuge's desert bighorn
sheep.
Under this alternative, maintenance and water supply to existing
developed waters in sheep habitat within Refuge wilderness would
continue and projects to increase the water collection efficiency of
such waters would be implemented. Sonoran pronghorn recovery activities
and developments would occur wherever determined best suited for
species recovery, subject to minimum requirements analysis in
wilderness.
The Refuge desert bighorn sheep hunt program would continue
unchanged under this alternative. The use of horses by Refuge visitors
would be allowed subject to special use permit. Visitor party size
would be limited to eight individuals or four vehicles and the maximum
length of stay would be fourteen (14) consecutive days. Collecting dead
and down firewood would be allowed for visitors traveling in the Refuge
backcountry (hiking away from the access roads). Three existing
vehicle-accessible developed campsites would be retained.
Alternative 5--Maximum Effort. This alternative focuses on
maximizing both the provision of visitor services and Refuge population
levels of desert bighorn sheep. Under this alternative all existing
developed waters in Refuge wilderness would be maintained and supplied
with water, and new developed waters would be created. In addition to
developed waters, the Refuge would develop forage enhancements in
suitable areas of desert bighorn sheep habitat to provide forage for a
larger desert bighorn sheep population.
The desert bighorn sheep hunt program would continue unchanged
under this alternative. Horses would be allowed on the Refuge for
visitors, restrictions of collection of firewood would be eliminated
and two additional developed campsites would be developed along the
non-wilderness access roads. No visitor party size limitations would be
imposed, and the maximum length of stay would be fourteen (14)
consecutive days.
We have selected Alternative 4, the Preferred Alternative, for
implementation at the Refuge. Alternative 4 addresses the key issues
identified during the planning process and will best achieve the
purposes and goals of the Refuge as well as the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System. This decision includes adoption of
Comprehensive Conservation Plan Chapters (Appendix M of the Final CCP/
WSP/EIS). Implementation of the CCP will occur over the next 15 years
and will depend on future staffing levels and funding.
The Service's Basis for the Decision: Based on a review of the
environmental consequences of each alternative, we judged Alternative 4
to be the environmentally preferable alternative. Alternative 4 is also
expected to lead to more overall public support and a more appropriate
level of public use opportunities than the other alternatives.
Alternative 1 was not considered for selection as it describes current
management and was presented primarily as a baseline against which to
compare the proposed alternatives. Alternatives 2 and 3 were not
selected primarily because their spatial restrictions of management
activity would likely lead to inefficient and sub-optimal sampling and
recovery implementation for the Sonoran pronghorn. Alternative 5 was
not selected because its level of management intervention within
wilderness to manage a larger population of desert bighorn sheep on the
Refuge would create excessive impacts to wilderness character. The
increased levels of public use anticipated under Alternative 5 and the
absence of any restrictions on firewood collection, visitor horse use
and visitor party size would likely create localized adverse impacts to
habitat and wildlife populations.
The rationale for choosing the selected alternative as the best
alternative for the CCP/WSP/EIS is based on the impact of this
alternative on the issues and concerns that surfaced during the
planning process. Because all practicable means to avoid or minimize
environmental harm have been incorporated into the preferred
alternative, no mitigation measures have been identified.
Public Comments on Final CCP/WSP/EIS: During the 30-day waiting
period, we received three written comments. The comments did not raise
any issues not addressed in the Final CCP/WSP/EIS, and the comments did
not result in changes to the analysis of environmental consequences or
affect our response to similar comments in the Final EIS. All written
comments received during the 30-day waiting period are available for
review at the Refuge headquarters in Ajo, Arizona (see ADDRESSES).
[[Page 54283]]
Dated: July 19, 2007.
Benjamin N. Tuggle,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New
Mexico.
[FR Doc. 07-4715 Filed 9-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M