Defense Science Board, 54249 [07-4707]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 184 / Monday, September 24, 2007 / Notices
rebut an express or implied charge
against the declarant of recent
fabrication or improper influence or
motive.’’ Unlike Rule 801(d)(1)(A), the
earlier consistent statement need not
have been made under oath or at any
type of proceeding. On its face, the Rule
does not require that the consistent
statement offered have been made prior
to the time the improper influence or
motive arose or prior to the alleged
recent fabrication. Notwithstanding this,
the Supreme Court has read such a
requirement into the rule. Tome v.
United States, 513 U.S. 150 (1995); see
also United States v. Allison, 49 M.J. 54
(C.A.A.F. 1998). The limitation does
not, however, prevent admission of a
consistent statement made after an
inconsistent statement but before the
improper influence or motive arose.
United States v. Scholle, 553 F. 2d 1109
(8th Cir. 1977). Rule 801(d)(1)(B)
provides a possible means to admit
evidence of fresh complaint in
prosecution of sexual offenses.
Although limited to circumstances in
which there is a charge, for example, of
recent fabrication, the Rule, when
applicable, would permit not only fact
of fresh complaint, as is presently
possible, but also the entire portion of
the consistent statement.’’
Dated: September 18, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. E7–18787 Filed 9–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Defense Science Board
Department of Defense.
Notice of Advisory Committee
meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Defense Science Board
Task Force on Nuclear Weapons Surety
will meet in closed session on October
10–11, 2007; at the Institute for Defense
Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA.
The mission of the Defense Science
Board is to advise the Secretary of
Defense and the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology &
Logistics on scientific and technical
matters as they affect the perceived
needs of the Department of Defense. At
the meeting, the Defense Science Board
Task Force will: Assess all aspects of
nuclear weapons surety; continue to
build on the work of the former Joint
Advisory Committee on Nuclear
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:43 Sep 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
Weapons Surety, the Nuclear C2 System
End-to-End Review and the Drell Panel;
and review and recommend methods
and strategies to maintain a safe, secure
and viable nuclear deterrent.
The task force’s findings and
recommendations, pursuant to 41 CFR
102–3.140 through 102–3.165, will be
presented and discussed by the
membership of the Defense Science
Board prior to being presented to the
Government’s decision maker.
Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.120 and
102–3.150, the Designated Federal
Officer for the Defense Science Board
will determine and announce in the
Federal Register when the findings and
recommendations of the October 10–11,
2007, meeting are deliberated by the
Defense Science Board.
Interested persons may submit a
written statement for consideration by
the Defense Science Board. Individuals
submitting a written statement must
submit their statement to the Designated
Federal Official at the address detailed
below; at any point, however, if a
written statement is not received at least
10 calendar days prior to the meeting,
which is the subject of this notice, then
it may not be provided to or considered
by the Defense Science Board. The
Designated Federal Official will review
all timely submissions with the Defense
Science Board Chairperson, and ensure
they are provided to members of the
Defense Science Board before the
meeting that is the subject of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David McDarby, HQ DTRA/OP–CSNS,
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 6201,
Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060; via e-mail at
david.mcdarby@dtra.mil; or via phone
at (703) 767–4364.
Dated: September 17, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07–4707 Filed 9–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before October
24, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54249
Comments should be emailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to (202) 245–6623. Commenters should
include the following subject line in
their response ‘‘Comment: [insert OMB
number], [insert abbreviated collection
name, e.g., ‘‘Upward Bound
Evaluation’’]. Persons submitting
comments electronically should not
submit paper copies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: September 18, 2007.
James Hyler,
Acting Leader, Information Management Case
Services Team, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: National Assessment of
Educational Progress 2008–2010
Operational and Pilot Surveys System
Clearance—Wave 3.
Frequency: One time.
Affected Public: Individuals or
household; not-for-profit institutions;
State, Local, or Tribal Gov’t, SEAs or
LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 3,270.
Burden Hours: 1,082.
Abstract: These materials are
questionnaires to be used in 2008 for the
NAEP for administrators/teachers to
complete to describe students identified
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 184 (Monday, September 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 54249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4707]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Defense Science Board
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Weapons Surety
will meet in closed session on October 10-11, 2007; at the Institute
for Defense Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA.
The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At the
meeting, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess all aspects
of nuclear weapons surety; continue to build on the work of the former
Joint Advisory Committee on Nuclear Weapons Surety, the Nuclear C2
System End-to-End Review and the Drell Panel; and review and recommend
methods and strategies to maintain a safe, secure and viable nuclear
deterrent.
The task force's findings and recommendations, pursuant to 41 CFR
102-3.140 through 102-3.165, will be presented and discussed by the
membership of the Defense Science Board prior to being presented to the
Government's decision maker.
Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.120 and 102-3.150, the Designated Federal
Officer for the Defense Science Board will determine and announce in
the Federal Register when the findings and recommendations of the
October 10-11, 2007, meeting are deliberated by the Defense Science
Board.
Interested persons may submit a written statement for consideration
by the Defense Science Board. Individuals submitting a written
statement must submit their statement to the Designated Federal
Official at the address detailed below; at any point, however, if a
written statement is not received at least 10 calendar days prior to
the meeting, which is the subject of this notice, then it may not be
provided to or considered by the Defense Science Board. The Designated
Federal Official will review all timely submissions with the Defense
Science Board Chairperson, and ensure they are provided to members of
the Defense Science Board before the meeting that is the subject of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David McDarby, HQ DTRA/OP-CSNS,
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 6201, Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060; via e-mail
at david.mcdarby@dtra.mil; or via phone at (703) 767-4364.
Dated: September 17, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-4707 Filed 9-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
