Hazardous Materials: Fuel Cell Cartridges and Systems Transported on Board Passenger Aircraft in Carry-on Baggage, 53744-53749 [E7-18532]
Download as PDF
53744
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 182 / Thursday, September 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Dated: September 13, 2007.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.
[FR Doc. E7–18586 Filed 9–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 171, 173, and 175
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–25446 (HM–243)]
RIN 2137–AE19
Hazardous Materials: Fuel Cell
Cartridges and Systems Transported
on Board Passenger Aircraft in Carryon Baggage
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: PHMSA is proposing to
amend the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR) to permit certain
fuel cell cartridges and fuel cell systems
designed for portable electronic devices
to be transported by passengers and
crew in carry-on baggage on board
passenger-carrying aircraft. The
proposed rule would cover fuel cells
containing certain hazardous materials
(flammable liquids, including methanol;
formic acid; certain borohydride
materials; or butane) and meeting
certain performance and consumer use
standards, which we are proposing to
incorporate by reference into the HMR.
We have evaluated the possible
transportation safety risks presented by
these fuel cell cartridges and systems
and have determined they may safely be
transported in the cabin of a passengercarrying aircraft.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before November 19,
2007.
You may submit comments
identified by the docket number
(PHMSA–2006–25446 (HM–243) by any
of the following methods:
• Web site: Until September 27, 2007,
electronic submissions to the DOT
Docket Management System (DMS),
located at https://dms.dot.gov. Starting
on September 28, 2007, all electronic
submissions must be made to the
Federal Docket Management System’s
(FDMS) eRulemaking Portal located at
https://www.regulations.gov, and the
information in the DOT DMS will be
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:08 Sep 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
migrated to the FDMS. This work is
being done as part of a larger project to
consolidate the federal rulemaking
docket systems. Please note the FDMS is
significantly different from the DOT
DMS and may assign a new docket
number to each existing docket. Follow
the instructions specific to each docket
Web site for submitting comments. On
December 31, 2007, the DOT DMS will
be permanently decommissioned.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: To Docket
Operations, Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this notice. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
Public Participation heading of the
Supplementary Information section of
this document. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to the docket management system,
including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act
heading under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: For access to the dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov, and after September 28,
2007, to https://www.regulations.gov at
any time or to Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation (see
ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eileen Edmonson, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards, (202) 366–8553,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590, facsimile telephone number
(202) 366–7435, or by e-mail to
Eileen.Edmonson@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Fuel cell cartridges and fuel cell
systems are an emerging energy
technology developed to provide a more
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
efficient, longer-lasting, and renewable
power source for electrically operated
equipment. Fuel cells are designed to
replace, augment, or recharge existing
battery sources. Various types of fuels
may be used in fuel cell systems,
including but not limited to gases
meeting the criteria for classification as
Division 2.1 (flammable gases), solids
meeting the criteria for classification as
Division 4.3 (dangerous when wet), and
liquids meeting the criteria for
classification as Class 3 (flammable) or
Class 8 (corrosive) material. Specific
materials used in fuel cells include
methanol and other types of flammable
liquids, butane, hydrogen in metal
hydride, borohydrides, and formic acid.
II. Current HMR Requirements
Applicable to the Transportation of
Fuel Cells
Under the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 171–
180), fuel cells generally must be
transported in accordance with
requirements applicable to the material
they contain. Thus, a fuel cell
containing a corrosive material must
conform to the packaging and hazard
communication requirements applicable
to that corrosive material when offered
for transportation. After careful
evaluation of possible transportation
safety risks, PHMSA adopted packaging,
testing, and hazard communication
requirements for transporting fuel cell
systems and fuel cell cartridges
containing flammable liquids, including
methanol or methanol and water
solutions, as cargo by all modes (final
rule published December 29, 2006; 71
FR 7896). The HMR requirements are
consistent with international
transportation standards applicable to
the transportation of fuel cell cartridges
and systems containing flammable
liquids in the 14th Revised Edition of
the UN Recommendations on the
Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN
Recommendations).
III. International Standards Applicable
to the Transportation of Fuel Cells
The International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) adopted provisions
for transporting fuel cell systems and
fuel cell cartridges containing
flammable liquid as cargo on board
aircraft in the 2007–2008 edition of the
ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe
Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
(ICAO Technical Instructions). These
provisions are consistent with those for
fuel cell systems and cartridges in the
UN Recommendations. At that time,
ICAO also adopted under Section 8;
1.1.2(r) provisions for transporting fuel
cell systems and cartridges containing
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 182 / Thursday, September 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
flammable liquids (including methanol),
formic acid, and butane, in carry-on
baggage on board passenger-carrying
aircraft under certain conditions. This
passenger carry-on authorization applies
to fuel cell cartridges with a maximum
quantity of 200 ml (6.76 ounces) for
liquids, 200 ml (6.76 ounces) for metal
fuel cell cartridges containing butane,
and 120 ml (4.1 ounces) for non-metallic
fuel cell cartridges containing butane.
No more than two spare fuel cell
cartridges are allowed per passenger.
One of the conditions for the
passenger authorization in the ICAO
Technical Instructions is that the fuel
cell systems and cartridges must
conform to the industry technical
specification governing the design and
consumer use of fuel cell cartridges,
power units, and power systems
developed by the IEC. The IEC
Specification No. IEC/PAS 62282–6–1
First Edition, with Technical
Corrigendum 1, 2006, addresses fuel cell
systems with outputs that do not exceed
60 volts and 240 watts. The IEC
specification provides detailed
manufacturing, safety, and testing
requirements to address use, misuse,
and consumer transportation. To ensure
the capability of the fuel cell and
cartridge to withstand normal
conditions of consumer handling and
transportation, the specification requires
various design type tests such as
pressure differential, vibration,
temperature cycling, high temperature
exposure, drop, compressive loading,
connection cycling, external short
circuit, and long-term storage.
Members of the fuel cell industry and
the IEC prepared and submitted
proposals (included in this docket) to
the ICAO Dangerous Goods Panel that
the Panel considered in making its
decision to permit certain fuel cell
systems and cartridges to be transported
by passengers on board aircraft
beginning on January 1, 2007. The
proposals provide an assessment of the
benefits and risks associated with
transporting fuel cell systems and
cartridges containing butane, formic
acid, methanol, hydrogen stored in
metal hydrides, and sodium
borohydride-based and potassium
borohydride-based fuels. PHMSA
conducted its own independent
technical assessment of the safety risks
associated with each of the proposed
fuel cell system and cartridge
technologies; based on this evaluation,
PHMSA supported the passenger
provisions adopted in the ICAO
Technical Instructions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Flammable Gas (Butane) and
Leakage Criteria
In our technical evaluation for this
NPRM, PHMSA, in coordination with
the Federal Aviation Administration’s
(FAA’s) William J. Hughes Technical
Center (FAA Tech Center), conducted
an additional examination specific to
the design type testing criteria for fuel
cell cartridges containing liquefied
flammable gas (butane). This evaluation
concluded that the industry technical
specification developed to govern the
design and use of fuel cell cartridges
and systems, IEC/PAS 62282–6–1,
required amendment to ensure fuel cells
containing a flammable gas are designed
and tested to a standard that is
equivalent to the safety standard
established for certain non-bulk gas
packagings in the HMR.
Based on the PHMSA and FAA
evaluations, the ICAO Dangerous Goods
Panel at its Working Group 2006
meeting (October 25–November 3, 2006)
recommended that the IEC amend its
fuel cell specification to mandate a zeroleak standard as a basis for successfully
passing the design-type tests. This zeroleak standard would be demonstrated by
subjecting the cartridge test sample to a
water bath test (consistent with Section
6.2.4.1 of the UN Recommendations)
after each design type test. The IEC
revised its test protocols and acceptance
criteria and issued an addendum
(included in this docket) to the IEC PAS
62282–6–1 on April 18, 2007, published
as ‘‘IEC/PAS 62282–6–1 First Edition,
with Technical Corrigendum 1, 2006.’’
The IEC plans to continue to review this
standard for possible improvements.
PHMSA will monitor further
developments to the standard and,
subject to technical review, may
propose to adopt a later version in a
subsequent rulemaking.
V. Petitions for Rulemaking
On March 2, 2006, the U.S. Fuel Cell
Council petitioned PHMSA to permit
airline passengers and crew to transport
fuel cell systems and cartridges in carryon baggage (Petition No. P–1475). In its
petition, the U.S. Fuel Cell Council
requests that PHMSA revise § 175.10 to
permit portable electronic devices, such
as cameras, laptop computers, and
hand-held audio devices, powered by
fuel cell systems and cartridges
containing flammable liquid, formic
acid, or butane to be transported by
passengers and crew on passengercarrying aircraft under the conditions
adopted by ICAO. On August 23, 2006,
Medis Technologies, Ltd., and
Millennium Cell, Inc., petitioned
PHMSA to permit fuel cell systems and
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53745
cartridges containing Class 8
borohydride materials to be transported
by passengers and crew in carry-on
baggage on board passenger-carrying
aircraft (Petition No. P–1483). Medis
Technologies and Millennium Cell
assert that Class 8 borohydride materials
present the same risks in transportation
as formic acid, also a Class 8 material.
Both petitions may be viewed until
September 27, 2007, in the DMS docket
for this rulemaking at https://
dms.dot.gov, and beginning on
September 28, 2007, in the FDMS
docket for this rulemaking at https://
www.regulations.gov.
VI. Proposals in This NPRM
In this NPRM, we are proposing to
permit the transportation in carry-on
baggage on passenger-carrying aircraft of
fuel cell cartridges and systems
containing Class 3 flammable liquids,
including methanol; formic acid and
borohydride materials meeting the
definition for a Class 8 material; and
butane, a Division 2.1 gas. As proposed
in this NPRM, the fuel cells must
conform to certain performance criteria.
The proposals in this NPRM are
consistent with the passenger
authorizations adopted for the 2007–
2008 edition of the ICAO Technical
Instructions.
Based on our assessment to date, we
agree with the U.S. Fuel Cell Council
that fuel cell cartridges and systems
containing flammable liquids, formic
acid, and butane do not pose an
unreasonable safety risk when carried
on board aircraft by passengers and
crew members, provided they meet the
specified performance standards. We
also agree with Medis Technologies and
Millennium Cell that fuel cell cartridges
and systems containing borohydride
materials pose similar safety risks and
will operate in a similar manner as
those containing formic acid.
It is important to note, however, that
we are continuing to work with the FAA
Tech Center to evaluate the safety risks
posed by the air transportation of fuel
cell cartridges and systems containing
various types and classes of hazardous
materials. We expect to conclude this
evaluation prior to issuing a final rule
under this docket; it will be placed in
the docket for this rulemaking.
As indicated above, we are proposing
to require fuel cell cartridges and
systems to meet rigorous performance
criteria that are consistent with the
conditions applicable to the passenger
authorization in the ICAO Technical
Instructions. First, we are proposing to
incorporate into the HMR the industry
technical specification and addendum
developed by the IEC governing the
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
53746
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 182 / Thursday, September 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
design and consumer use of fuel cell
cartridges, power units, and power
systems (IEC/PAS 62282–6–1 First
Edition, with Technical Corrigendum 1,
2006). The IEC technical specification is
a comprehensive standard that
addresses design, manufacturing,
testing, and transportation specific to
micro-fuel cells. It prescribes
requirements for valves, filling,
packaging performance, failure mode
analysis, consumer refilling, materials of
construction, exterior and exhaust
temperature limits, warnings,
certification, markings, and
manufacturers’ instructions. As revised
by the recent addendum, the IEC
specification mandates a zero-leak
standard as a basis for successfully
passing the design-type tests and, thus,
is equivalent to the safety standard
established for certain non-bulk gas
packagings in the HMR. We also
propose to limit fuel cell cartridges and
systems carried by airline passengers
and crew to those marked ‘‘APPROVED
FOR CARRIAGE IN AIRCRAFT CABIN
ONLY’’ by the manufacturer. This
marking is the manufacturer’s
certification that the fuel cell cartridges
and systems conform to the performance
standard established in the revised IEC
technical specification.
In addition, in this NPRM, we are
proposing to limit the amount of
hazardous material that may be
contained in each individual fuel cell
authorized for transportation in carry-on
baggage on board passenger-carrying
aircraft. Consistent with the standard
adopted for the ICAO Technical
Instructions, we propose to limit fuel
cells containing liquid fuels to 200 mL
(6.76 ounces) of fuel per cartridge, fuel
cells containing liquefied gases to 200
mL (6.76 ounces) of fuel per metal
cartridge and 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) of
fuel per non-metallic fuel cell cartridge,
and fuel cells containing solid materials
to 200 g (7 ounces) of fuel per cartridge.
Also consistent with the ICAO
Technical Instructions, each passenger
or crew member would be permitted to
carry up to two spare cartridges.
To reduce possible releases, we
propose to prohibit passengers and crew
members from refilling fuel cell
cartridges and systems, except to install
a spare cartridge. In addition, we
propose to limit fuel cell cartridges and
systems carried by passengers and crew
members to a type and design that will
not continue to charge batteries when
the device being powered is not in use.
Again, these prohibitions are consistent
with the passenger authorizations for
fuel cells adopted under the ICAO
Technical Instructions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
VII. Transportation Security
Administration
The Department of Homeland
Security’s Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) is authorized to
prescribe security standards for all
modes of transportation, including
aviation (49 U.S.C. 114(d)). Under this
authority, TSA prohibits airline
passengers from carrying weapons,
explosives, or incendiary devices and
has published several interpretative
rules to provide guidance on the types
of property TSA considers subject to the
prohibition (68 FR 7444; 68 FR 9902; 70
FR 9877).
As PHMSA developed this NPRM, we
consulted with TSA concerning current
security limitations applicable to the
carriage of fuel cells by aircraft
passengers and crew members and
shared with TSA our technical analysis
supporting this rulemaking. We
understand that TSA is considering
whether any additional security
measures for fuel cells or fuel cell
systems may be appropriate. In any
case, this rulemaking would not limit
TSA’s authority to address security
concerns related to the transportation of
fuel cells or fuel cell systems.
On September 26, 2006, TSA imposed
a strict limit on liquids, gels, and
aerosols an aircraft passenger is
permitted to take through a security
checkpoint in carry-on baggage. TSA
limits these materials to 3-ounce (100
mL) or smaller containers placed in a
clear quart-size, zip-top plastic bag. Fuel
cell cartridges and systems would be
subject to this limitation,
notwithstanding any rule adopted in
this proceeding.
VIII. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This notice of proposed rulemaking is
published under the following statutory
authorities:
1. 49 U.S.C. 5103(b) authorizes the
Secretary of Transportation to prescribe
regulations for the safe transportation,
including security, of hazardous
material in intrastate, interstate, and
foreign commerce. This NPRM proposes
regulations to promote the safe
transportation of fuel cells carried by
airline passengers and crew members.
To this end, as detailed above, PHMSA
proposes to limit the types and
quantities of fuel cell cartridges and fuel
cell systems permitted on passenger
aircraft, prescribe specific performancebased design and packaging criteria for
these articles, and limit the manner in
which they may be used during air
transportation.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Section 5120 of Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C.
5120), authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to participate in the
development of international standards
for the transportation of hazardous
materials and grants the Secretary broad
discretion to harmonize the HMR with
international standards. Section 5120(c)
permits the Secretary to establish more
stringent standards for transportation in
the United States as necessary in the
public interest. The proposals in this
NPRM would harmonize the HMR with
international requirements for fuel cell
systems and cartridges to the extent
these are consistent with PHMSA’s
safety objectives.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and was not
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. This NPRM is a nonsignificant rule under the Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of the
Department of Transportation [44 FR
11034].
Fuel cells are an emerging technology
designed to meet the growing demand
for alternative energy sources. Fuel cell
technology has not yet achieved widespread commercialization, but is being
developed for use in mobile phones,
laptop computers, and, to a lesser
extent, camcorders, digital cameras, and
personal digital assistants (‘‘PDAs’’).
The U.S. Fuel Cell Council found, as a
result of its 2006 survey of 181 industry
respondents, that sales from 2005 to
2006 of all fuel cell and fuel cell-based
systems, of which those designed for
portable electronic devices are currently
a small part, increased by 7 percent to
$353 million, and research and
development expenditures and industry
employment over the same period
increased by 11 and 12 percent to $796
million and 7,074 employees,
respectively. The industry projects fuel
cells for portable electronic devices will
achieve significant market penetration
by 2009.
By proposing to authorize their
carriage by airline passengers and crew,
the regulatory changes addressed in this
rulemaking will lift barriers to the
commercialization and distribution of
fuel cell cartridges for use in personal
electronic equipment. The costs
associated with this rulemaking
proposal primarily relate to the costs for
testing fuel cell designs in accordance
with the IEC consensus standard. We
expect most fuel cell manufacturers will
voluntarily comply with the IEC
standard as a positive marketing tool
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 182 / Thursday, September 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
because it addresses broad consumer
safety issues and provides independent
assurance that fuel cells will meet a
rigorous safety standard. Thus, the
incremental costs imposed by this
NPRM are expected to be minimal.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule has been analyzed
in accordance with the principles and
criteria set forth in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). Any rule
resulting from this rulemaking will
preempt State, local, and Indian tribe
requirements but will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, the
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5125(b))
expressly preempts State, local, and
Indian tribe requirements on certain
covered subjects, as follows:
(1) The designation, description, and
classification of hazardous materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling,
labeling, marking, and placarding of
hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and
use of shipping documents related to
hazardous materials, and requirements
related to the number, contents, and
placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification,
recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation
of hazardous materials; and
(5) The design, manufacture,
fabrication, inspection, marking,
maintenance, reconditioning, repair, or
testing of a packaging or container
represented, marked, certified, or sold
as qualified for use in transporting
hazardous material.
This proposed rule addresses covered
subject items (1), (2), (3), and (5) above
and would preempt State, local, and
Indian tribe requirements not meeting
the ‘‘substantively the same’’ standard.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(2), we
would deem federal preemption
effective upon the effective date of the
final rule. We are proposing to make the
final rule effective approximately 90
days after it is published in the Federal
Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria set forth in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this proposed rule does not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
have tribal implications and does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs, the funding and consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact
on small entities, unless the agency
determines the rule is not expected to
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule will relax regulatory
barriers to the transportation of fuel
cells used in personal electronic devices
and, accordingly, is expected to have a
positive impact on small businesses that
manufacture, distribute, transport, or
use such items. As indicated above, we
expect the incremental costs imposed by
this NPRM to be minimal. Therefore, I
certify that, if adopted, the proposals in
this NPRM will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule has been
developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (‘‘Proper Consideration of
Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking’’)
and DOT’s procedures and policies to
promote compliance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that
potential impacts of draft rules on small
entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations, requires PHMSA to
provide interested members of the
public and affected agencies an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping requests.
This NPRM does not include new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN contained in the heading
of this document can be used to crossreference this action with the Unified
Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of
$120.7 million or more to either State,
local or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, and
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53747
is the least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), §§ 4321–4375, requires that
federal agencies analyze proposed
actions to determine whether the action
will have a significant impact on the
human environment. The Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations order federal agencies to
conduct an environmental review
considering (1) the need for the
proposed action, (2) alternatives to the
proposed action, (3) probable
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives, and (4) the
agencies and persons consulted during
the consideration process. 40 CFR
1508.9(b).
Purpose and Need
Fuel cells are an emerging energy
technology designed to replace,
augment, or recharge existing battery
sources. The fuel cell designs currently
under development are powered by one
of a variety of hazardous materials fuels,
including methanol and other types of
flammable liquids, butane flammable
gas, dangerous when wet hydrogen in
metal hydride, and corrosive liquids
containing formic acid or borohydride
materials.
The HMR and the ICAO Technical
Instructions already include provisions
for transporting fuel cell systems and
fuel cell cartridges containing
flammable liquid as cargo on board
aircraft. See 49 CFR 173.230, and
Special Provision 146 of the HMR, and
Packing Instruction 313 of the 2007–
2008 edition of the ICAO Technical
Instructions. In addition, the ICAO also
adopted (in Section 8:1.1.2(r))
provisions that will permit these
devices to be fueled by formic acid or
butane, and transported in carry-on
baggage on board passenger-carrying
aircraft under certain conditions. This
rulemaking proposes to harmonize the
HMR with these additional ICAO
requirements. To limit both the safety
and environmental consequences
should an incident occur, this
rulemaking also proposes restrictions on
the fuel cell system configurations and
limits on the amount of hazardous
material contained in each fuel cell
cartridge. There are no significant
environmental impacts associated with
this NPRM.
Alternatives
The alternatives PHMSA is
considering are as follows:
No action—If no action is taken,
passengers would not be permitted to
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
53748
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 182 / Thursday, September 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
transport personal electronic devices
powered by fuel cell technology in
carry-on baggage on domestic flights.
The industry views such authorization
as key to continued development and
use of this technology. Without explicit
action to permit airline passengers to
carry fuel cell powered devices,
technological development could well
be delayed. This action is not
recommended.
Actions Proposed in this NPRM—The
actions proposed in this NPRM would
harmonize the HMR requirements for
fuel cells with those prescribed in the
international regulations. These
proposed amendments are intended to
update, clarify, and provide relief from
certain existing regulatory requirements
to promote safer transportation
practices, finalize outstanding petitions
for rulemaking, facilitate international
commerce, and make the regulations
easier to understand. This action is
recommended.
To Regulate All Fuel Cells in the
Manner Prescribed in the IEC
Standard—In addition to the materials
covered by the proposed rule, the IEC
standard covers fuel cells containing
solid Division 4.3 (dangerous when wet)
materials. As explained above, this
design was not included in the ICAO
standard to which we are proposing to
harmonize in this rulemaking. PHMSA
believes those fuel cell designs that have
not been included in the ICAO
standards warrant further safety review
and that adopting a standard
inconsistent with the international
standard cannot be justified at this time.
Analysis of Environmental Impacts
We regulate hazardous materials
transported by aircraft, vessel, rail, and
highway. The potential for
environmental damage or contamination
exists when packages of hazardous
materials are involved in accidents or en
route incidents resulting from cargo
shifts, valve failures, package failures, or
loading, unloading, or handling
problems. The ecosystems that could be
affected by a release include air, water,
soil, and ecological resources (for
example, wildlife habitats). The adverse
environmental impacts associated with
releases of most hazardous materials are
short-term impacts that can be greatly
reduced or eliminated through prompt
clean up of the accident scene. Most
hazardous materials are not transported
in quantities sufficient to cause
significant, long-term environmental
damage if they are released.
The hazardous material regulatory
system is a risk-management system that
is prevention oriented and focused on
identifying a hazard and reducing the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
probability and quantity of a hazardous
material release. Hazardous materials
are categorized by hazard analysis and
experience into hazard classes and
packing groups. The regulations require
each shipper to classify a material in
accordance with these hazard classes
and packing groups; the process of
classifying a hazardous material is itself
a form of hazard analysis. Further, the
regulations require the shipper to
communicate the material’s hazards
through use of the hazard class, packing
group, and proper shipping name on the
shipping paper, labels and markings on
packages, and placards on transport
vehicles. Thus the shipping paper,
labels, markings, and placards
communicate the most significant
findings of the shipper’s hazard
analysis. Excluding compressed gases,
radioactive materials, and explosives,
which all have their own packaging
strength criteria, a hazardous material is
assigned to one of three packing groups
based upon its degree of hazard—from
a high hazard, Packing Group I, to a low
hazard, Packing Group III material—
except gases and certain other materials
with high integrity packagings. The
HMR are designed to ensure the quality,
damage resistance, and performance
standards of the packaging for each
hazardous material are appropriate for
the hazards of the material transported.
We have reviewed the risks associated
with transporting fuel cell systems and
cartridges. The amount of hazardous
material contained within the fuel cells
or cartridges to which this NPRM
applies is minimal, limited to 200 mL or
200 g by this proposal. Even if a large
number of these devices were
compromised and their hazardous
materials contents released, the
environmental impact of the release
would not be significant. We have
determined there will be no significant
environmental impacts associated with
this proposed rule.
Consultation and Public Comment
As discussed above, PHMSA
consulted with the IEC and many
companies representing the fuel cell
industry here and abroad to prepare for
U.N. Dangerous Goods Council meetings
on these devices. PHMSA also
participated in the technical review of
papers prepared by these companies
explaining the potential risks and
measures taken in the IEC standard to
reduce risks for each fuel the IEC
standard states may be present in a fuel
cell. In addition, also as discussed
earlier, PHMSA has consulted
extensively with the U.S. Fuel Council,
Medis Technologies, Ltd., and
Millenium Cell, Inc., in response to
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
their petitions for rulemaking,
numbered P–1475 and P–1483, to
permit passengers and crew to transport
in carry-on baggage on board passenger
aircraft fuel cells containing flammable
liquid, formic acid, butane, and Class 8
borohydride materials for use in
portable electronic devices. PHMSA has
also received a letter signed by
approximately 18 companies supporting
the proposed regulation of fuel cells in
the HMR.
We invite interested persons to
submit comments on the potential
environmental, safety, and other
impacts of the proposals subject to
federal regulation in this NPRM.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78), which
may also be found at https://dms.dot.gov,
and on and after September 28, 2007,
may be found at https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation,
Packaging and containers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Uranium.
49 CFR Part 175
Air carriers, Hazardous materials
transportation, Incorporation by
reference, Radioactive materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
propose to amend 49 CFR Chapter I as
follows:
PART 171—GENERAL INFORMATION,
REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 171
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53; Pub. L. 101–410 section
4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 Note); Pub. L. 104–134
section 31001.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
53749
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 182 / Thursday, September 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
2. In § 171.7, in paragraph (a)(3), in
the Table, an entry for the International
Electrotechnical Commission is added
in appropriate alphabetical order to read
as follows:
§ 171.7
*
Reference material.
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
*
Source and name of material
*
49 CFR reference
*
*
*
*
*
*
´
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 3, rue de Varembe, P.O. Box 131, CH—1211, GENEVA 20, Switzerland:
Fuel cell technologies—Part 6–1: Micro fuel cell power systems—Safety, IEC/PAS 62282–6–1 First Edition, with Technical Corrigendum 1, 2006 ...............................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2. In § 171.8, two new definitions for
‘‘fuel cell’’ and ‘‘fuel cell cartridge’’ are
added in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
§ 171.8
Definitions and abbreviations.
*
*
*
*
*
Fuel cell means an electrochemical
device that converts the energy of the
chemical reaction between a fuel, such
as hydrogen or hydrogen rich gases,
alcohols, hydrocarbons, and an oxidant,
such as air or oxygen, to direct current
(d.c.) power, heat, and other reaction
products.
Fuel cell cartridge or Fuel cartridge
means a removable article that contains
and supplies fuel to the micro fuel cell
power unit or internal reservoir, not to
be refilled by the user.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS
AND PACKAGINGS
3. The authority citation for part 173
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. In § 173.230, paragraph (a) is
revised and new paragraph (d) is added,
to read as follows:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 173.230 Fuel cell cartridges containing
flammable liquids.
(a) A fuel cell cartridge must be
designed and constructed to prevent the
fuel it contains from leaking during
normal conditions of transportation and
be free of electric charge generating
components.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Fuel cells intended for
transportation in carry-on baggage on
board passenger aircraft must also
comply with the applicable provisions
prescribed in § 175.10 of this
subchapter.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Sep 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
PART 175—CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT
5. The authority citation for part 175
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
6. In § 175.10, paragraph (a)(18) is
added to read as follows:
§ 175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crew
members, and air operators.
(a) * * *
(18) Portable electronic devices (for
example, cameras, cellular phones,
laptop computers, and camcorders)
powered by fuel cell systems, and not
more than two spare fuel cartridges per
passenger or crew member, when
transported in carry-on baggage by
aircraft under the following conditions:
(i) Fuel cell cartridges may contain
only Class 3 flammable liquids
(including methanol), Class 8 formic
acid, Class 8 borohydride materials, or
Division 2.1 butane;
(ii) The maximum quantity of fuel in
any fuel cell cartridge may not exceed:
(A) 200 mL (6.76 ounces) for liquids,
(B) 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) for
liquefied gases in non-metallic fuel cell
cartridges, or 200 mL for metal fuel cell
cartridges;
(C) 200 g (7 ounces) for solids;
(iii) No more than two spare fuel cell
cartridges may be carried by a
passenger;
(iv) Fuel cell systems containing fuel
and fuel cell cartridges including spare
cartridges are permitted in carry-on
baggage only;
(v) Fuel cell cartridges may not be
refillable by the user. Refueling of fuel
cell systems is not permitted except that
the installation of a spare cartridge is
allowed. Fuel cell cartridges that are
used to refill fuel cell systems but that
are not designed or intended to remain
installed (fuel cell refills) in a portable
electronic device are not permitted;
(vi) Fuel cell systems and fuel cell
cartridges must conform to IEC/PAS
62282–6–1 (IBR; see § 171.7 of this
subchapter);
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
§ 175.10
*
(vii) Interaction between fuel cells
and integrated batteries in a device must
conform to IEC/PAS 62282–6–1. Fuel
cell systems for which the sole function
is to charge a battery in the device are
not permitted;
(viii) Fuel cell systems must be of a
type that will not charge batteries when
the portable electronic device is not in
use; and
(ix) Each fuel cell cartridge and
system that conforms to the
requirements in this paragraph (a)(18)
must be durably marked by the
manufacturer with the wording:
‘‘APPROVED FOR CARRIAGE IN
AIRCRAFT CABIN ONLY’’ to certify
that the fuel cell cartridge or system
meets the specifications in IEC/PAS
62282–6–1 and with the maximum
quantity and type of fuel contained in
the cartridge or system.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
14, 2007, under the authority delegated in 49
CFR part 106.
Theodore L. Willke,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. E7–18532 Filed 9–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AV19
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 12-Month Petition Finding
and Proposed Rule To List the Polar
Bear (Ursus Maritimus) as Threatened
Throughout Its Range
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Reopening of comment period;
notice of availability of new
information.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 182 (Thursday, September 20, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53744-53749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18532]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 171, 173, and 175
[Docket No. PHMSA-2006-25446 (HM-243)]
RIN 2137-AE19
Hazardous Materials: Fuel Cell Cartridges and Systems Transported
on Board Passenger Aircraft in Carry-on Baggage
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: PHMSA is proposing to amend the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR) to permit certain fuel cell cartridges and fuel cell
systems designed for portable electronic devices to be transported by
passengers and crew in carry-on baggage on board passenger-carrying
aircraft. The proposed rule would cover fuel cells containing certain
hazardous materials (flammable liquids, including methanol; formic
acid; certain borohydride materials; or butane) and meeting certain
performance and consumer use standards, which we are proposing to
incorporate by reference into the HMR. We have evaluated the possible
transportation safety risks presented by these fuel cell cartridges and
systems and have determined they may safely be transported in the cabin
of a passenger-carrying aircraft.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before November 19,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number
(PHMSA-2006-25446 (HM-243) by any of the following methods:
Web site: Until September 27, 2007, electronic submissions
to the DOT Docket Management System (DMS), located at https://
dms.dot.gov. Starting on September 28, 2007, all electronic submissions
must be made to the Federal Docket Management System's (FDMS)
eRulemaking Portal located at https://www.regulations.gov, and the
information in the DOT DMS will be migrated to the FDMS. This work is
being done as part of a larger project to consolidate the federal
rulemaking docket systems. Please note the FDMS is significantly
different from the DOT DMS and may assign a new docket number to each
existing docket. Follow the instructions specific to each docket Web
site for submitting comments. On December 31, 2007, the DOT DMS will be
permanently decommissioned.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Routing
Symbol M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this
notice. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the Public Participation
heading of the Supplementary Information section of this document. Note
that all comments received will be posted without change to the docket
management system, including any personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Docket: For access to the dockets to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov, and after September 28,
2007, to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or to Docket
Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation (see ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Edmonson, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards, (202) 366-8553, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, facsimile telephone number (202) 366-7435, or by e-mail to
Eileen.Edmonson@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Fuel cell cartridges and fuel cell systems are an emerging energy
technology developed to provide a more efficient, longer-lasting, and
renewable power source for electrically operated equipment. Fuel cells
are designed to replace, augment, or recharge existing battery sources.
Various types of fuels may be used in fuel cell systems, including but
not limited to gases meeting the criteria for classification as
Division 2.1 (flammable gases), solids meeting the criteria for
classification as Division 4.3 (dangerous when wet), and liquids
meeting the criteria for classification as Class 3 (flammable) or Class
8 (corrosive) material. Specific materials used in fuel cells include
methanol and other types of flammable liquids, butane, hydrogen in
metal hydride, borohydrides, and formic acid.
II. Current HMR Requirements Applicable to the Transportation of Fuel
Cells
Under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 171-
180), fuel cells generally must be transported in accordance with
requirements applicable to the material they contain. Thus, a fuel cell
containing a corrosive material must conform to the packaging and
hazard communication requirements applicable to that corrosive material
when offered for transportation. After careful evaluation of possible
transportation safety risks, PHMSA adopted packaging, testing, and
hazard communication requirements for transporting fuel cell systems
and fuel cell cartridges containing flammable liquids, including
methanol or methanol and water solutions, as cargo by all modes (final
rule published December 29, 2006; 71 FR 7896). The HMR requirements are
consistent with international transportation standards applicable to
the transportation of fuel cell cartridges and systems containing
flammable liquids in the 14th Revised Edition of the UN Recommendations
on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN Recommendations).
III. International Standards Applicable to the Transportation of Fuel
Cells
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted
provisions for transporting fuel cell systems and fuel cell cartridges
containing flammable liquid as cargo on board aircraft in the 2007-2008
edition of the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of
Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions). These provisions
are consistent with those for fuel cell systems and cartridges in the
UN Recommendations. At that time, ICAO also adopted under Section 8;
1.1.2(r) provisions for transporting fuel cell systems and cartridges
containing
[[Page 53745]]
flammable liquids (including methanol), formic acid, and butane, in
carry-on baggage on board passenger-carrying aircraft under certain
conditions. This passenger carry-on authorization applies to fuel cell
cartridges with a maximum quantity of 200 ml (6.76 ounces) for liquids,
200 ml (6.76 ounces) for metal fuel cell cartridges containing butane,
and 120 ml (4.1 ounces) for non-metallic fuel cell cartridges
containing butane. No more than two spare fuel cell cartridges are
allowed per passenger.
One of the conditions for the passenger authorization in the ICAO
Technical Instructions is that the fuel cell systems and cartridges
must conform to the industry technical specification governing the
design and consumer use of fuel cell cartridges, power units, and power
systems developed by the IEC. The IEC Specification No. IEC/PAS 62282-
6-1 First Edition, with Technical Corrigendum 1, 2006, addresses fuel
cell systems with outputs that do not exceed 60 volts and 240 watts.
The IEC specification provides detailed manufacturing, safety, and
testing requirements to address use, misuse, and consumer
transportation. To ensure the capability of the fuel cell and cartridge
to withstand normal conditions of consumer handling and transportation,
the specification requires various design type tests such as pressure
differential, vibration, temperature cycling, high temperature
exposure, drop, compressive loading, connection cycling, external short
circuit, and long-term storage.
Members of the fuel cell industry and the IEC prepared and
submitted proposals (included in this docket) to the ICAO Dangerous
Goods Panel that the Panel considered in making its decision to permit
certain fuel cell systems and cartridges to be transported by
passengers on board aircraft beginning on January 1, 2007. The
proposals provide an assessment of the benefits and risks associated
with transporting fuel cell systems and cartridges containing butane,
formic acid, methanol, hydrogen stored in metal hydrides, and sodium
borohydride-based and potassium borohydride-based fuels. PHMSA
conducted its own independent technical assessment of the safety risks
associated with each of the proposed fuel cell system and cartridge
technologies; based on this evaluation, PHMSA supported the passenger
provisions adopted in the ICAO Technical Instructions.
IV. Flammable Gas (Butane) and Leakage Criteria
In our technical evaluation for this NPRM, PHMSA, in coordination
with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) William J. Hughes
Technical Center (FAA Tech Center), conducted an additional examination
specific to the design type testing criteria for fuel cell cartridges
containing liquefied flammable gas (butane). This evaluation concluded
that the industry technical specification developed to govern the
design and use of fuel cell cartridges and systems, IEC/PAS 62282-6-1,
required amendment to ensure fuel cells containing a flammable gas are
designed and tested to a standard that is equivalent to the safety
standard established for certain non-bulk gas packagings in the HMR.
Based on the PHMSA and FAA evaluations, the ICAO Dangerous Goods
Panel at its Working Group 2006 meeting (October 25-November 3, 2006)
recommended that the IEC amend its fuel cell specification to mandate a
zero-leak standard as a basis for successfully passing the design-type
tests. This zero-leak standard would be demonstrated by subjecting the
cartridge test sample to a water bath test (consistent with Section
6.2.4.1 of the UN Recommendations) after each design type test. The IEC
revised its test protocols and acceptance criteria and issued an
addendum (included in this docket) to the IEC PAS 62282-6-1 on April
18, 2007, published as ``IEC/PAS 62282-6-1 First Edition, with
Technical Corrigendum 1, 2006.'' The IEC plans to continue to review
this standard for possible improvements. PHMSA will monitor further
developments to the standard and, subject to technical review, may
propose to adopt a later version in a subsequent rulemaking.
V. Petitions for Rulemaking
On March 2, 2006, the U.S. Fuel Cell Council petitioned PHMSA to
permit airline passengers and crew to transport fuel cell systems and
cartridges in carry-on baggage (Petition No. P-1475). In its petition,
the U.S. Fuel Cell Council requests that PHMSA revise Sec. 175.10 to
permit portable electronic devices, such as cameras, laptop computers,
and hand-held audio devices, powered by fuel cell systems and
cartridges containing flammable liquid, formic acid, or butane to be
transported by passengers and crew on passenger-carrying aircraft under
the conditions adopted by ICAO. On August 23, 2006, Medis Technologies,
Ltd., and Millennium Cell, Inc., petitioned PHMSA to permit fuel cell
systems and cartridges containing Class 8 borohydride materials to be
transported by passengers and crew in carry-on baggage on board
passenger-carrying aircraft (Petition No. P-1483). Medis Technologies
and Millennium Cell assert that Class 8 borohydride materials present
the same risks in transportation as formic acid, also a Class 8
material. Both petitions may be viewed until September 27, 2007, in the
DMS docket for this rulemaking at https://dms.dot.gov, and beginning on
September 28, 2007, in the FDMS docket for this rulemaking at https://
www.regulations.gov.
VI. Proposals in This NPRM
In this NPRM, we are proposing to permit the transportation in
carry-on baggage on passenger-carrying aircraft of fuel cell cartridges
and systems containing Class 3 flammable liquids, including methanol;
formic acid and borohydride materials meeting the definition for a
Class 8 material; and butane, a Division 2.1 gas. As proposed in this
NPRM, the fuel cells must conform to certain performance criteria. The
proposals in this NPRM are consistent with the passenger authorizations
adopted for the 2007-2008 edition of the ICAO Technical Instructions.
Based on our assessment to date, we agree with the U.S. Fuel Cell
Council that fuel cell cartridges and systems containing flammable
liquids, formic acid, and butane do not pose an unreasonable safety
risk when carried on board aircraft by passengers and crew members,
provided they meet the specified performance standards. We also agree
with Medis Technologies and Millennium Cell that fuel cell cartridges
and systems containing borohydride materials pose similar safety risks
and will operate in a similar manner as those containing formic acid.
It is important to note, however, that we are continuing to work
with the FAA Tech Center to evaluate the safety risks posed by the air
transportation of fuel cell cartridges and systems containing various
types and classes of hazardous materials. We expect to conclude this
evaluation prior to issuing a final rule under this docket; it will be
placed in the docket for this rulemaking.
As indicated above, we are proposing to require fuel cell
cartridges and systems to meet rigorous performance criteria that are
consistent with the conditions applicable to the passenger
authorization in the ICAO Technical Instructions. First, we are
proposing to incorporate into the HMR the industry technical
specification and addendum developed by the IEC governing the
[[Page 53746]]
design and consumer use of fuel cell cartridges, power units, and power
systems (IEC/PAS 62282-6-1 First Edition, with Technical Corrigendum 1,
2006). The IEC technical specification is a comprehensive standard that
addresses design, manufacturing, testing, and transportation specific
to micro-fuel cells. It prescribes requirements for valves, filling,
packaging performance, failure mode analysis, consumer refilling,
materials of construction, exterior and exhaust temperature limits,
warnings, certification, markings, and manufacturers' instructions. As
revised by the recent addendum, the IEC specification mandates a zero-
leak standard as a basis for successfully passing the design-type tests
and, thus, is equivalent to the safety standard established for certain
non-bulk gas packagings in the HMR. We also propose to limit fuel cell
cartridges and systems carried by airline passengers and crew to those
marked ``APPROVED FOR CARRIAGE IN AIRCRAFT CABIN ONLY'' by the
manufacturer. This marking is the manufacturer's certification that the
fuel cell cartridges and systems conform to the performance standard
established in the revised IEC technical specification.
In addition, in this NPRM, we are proposing to limit the amount of
hazardous material that may be contained in each individual fuel cell
authorized for transportation in carry-on baggage on board passenger-
carrying aircraft. Consistent with the standard adopted for the ICAO
Technical Instructions, we propose to limit fuel cells containing
liquid fuels to 200 mL (6.76 ounces) of fuel per cartridge, fuel cells
containing liquefied gases to 200 mL (6.76 ounces) of fuel per metal
cartridge and 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) of fuel per non-metallic fuel
cell cartridge, and fuel cells containing solid materials to 200 g (7
ounces) of fuel per cartridge. Also consistent with the ICAO Technical
Instructions, each passenger or crew member would be permitted to carry
up to two spare cartridges.
To reduce possible releases, we propose to prohibit passengers and
crew members from refilling fuel cell cartridges and systems, except to
install a spare cartridge. In addition, we propose to limit fuel cell
cartridges and systems carried by passengers and crew members to a type
and design that will not continue to charge batteries when the device
being powered is not in use. Again, these prohibitions are consistent
with the passenger authorizations for fuel cells adopted under the ICAO
Technical Instructions.
VII. Transportation Security Administration
The Department of Homeland Security's Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) is authorized to prescribe security standards for
all modes of transportation, including aviation (49 U.S.C. 114(d)).
Under this authority, TSA prohibits airline passengers from carrying
weapons, explosives, or incendiary devices and has published several
interpretative rules to provide guidance on the types of property TSA
considers subject to the prohibition (68 FR 7444; 68 FR 9902; 70 FR
9877).
As PHMSA developed this NPRM, we consulted with TSA concerning
current security limitations applicable to the carriage of fuel cells
by aircraft passengers and crew members and shared with TSA our
technical analysis supporting this rulemaking. We understand that TSA
is considering whether any additional security measures for fuel cells
or fuel cell systems may be appropriate. In any case, this rulemaking
would not limit TSA's authority to address security concerns related to
the transportation of fuel cells or fuel cell systems.
On September 26, 2006, TSA imposed a strict limit on liquids, gels,
and aerosols an aircraft passenger is permitted to take through a
security checkpoint in carry-on baggage. TSA limits these materials to
3-ounce (100 mL) or smaller containers placed in a clear quart-size,
zip-top plastic bag. Fuel cell cartridges and systems would be subject
to this limitation, notwithstanding any rule adopted in this
proceeding.
VIII. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This notice of proposed rulemaking is published under the following
statutory authorities:
1. 49 U.S.C. 5103(b) authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to
prescribe regulations for the safe transportation, including security,
of hazardous material in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce.
This NPRM proposes regulations to promote the safe transportation of
fuel cells carried by airline passengers and crew members. To this end,
as detailed above, PHMSA proposes to limit the types and quantities of
fuel cell cartridges and fuel cell systems permitted on passenger
aircraft, prescribe specific performance-based design and packaging
criteria for these articles, and limit the manner in which they may be
used during air transportation.
2. Section 5120 of Federal hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5120), authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to
participate in the development of international standards for the
transportation of hazardous materials and grants the Secretary broad
discretion to harmonize the HMR with international standards. Section
5120(c) permits the Secretary to establish more stringent standards for
transportation in the United States as necessary in the public
interest. The proposals in this NPRM would harmonize the HMR with
international requirements for fuel cell systems and cartridges to the
extent these are consistent with PHMSA's safety objectives.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This NPRM is a non-significant rule
under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of
Transportation [44 FR 11034].
Fuel cells are an emerging technology designed to meet the growing
demand for alternative energy sources. Fuel cell technology has not yet
achieved wide-spread commercialization, but is being developed for use
in mobile phones, laptop computers, and, to a lesser extent,
camcorders, digital cameras, and personal digital assistants
(``PDAs''). The U.S. Fuel Cell Council found, as a result of its 2006
survey of 181 industry respondents, that sales from 2005 to 2006 of all
fuel cell and fuel cell-based systems, of which those designed for
portable electronic devices are currently a small part, increased by 7
percent to $353 million, and research and development expenditures and
industry employment over the same period increased by 11 and 12 percent
to $796 million and 7,074 employees, respectively. The industry
projects fuel cells for portable electronic devices will achieve
significant market penetration by 2009.
By proposing to authorize their carriage by airline passengers and
crew, the regulatory changes addressed in this rulemaking will lift
barriers to the commercialization and distribution of fuel cell
cartridges for use in personal electronic equipment. The costs
associated with this rulemaking proposal primarily relate to the costs
for testing fuel cell designs in accordance with the IEC consensus
standard. We expect most fuel cell manufacturers will voluntarily
comply with the IEC standard as a positive marketing tool
[[Page 53747]]
because it addresses broad consumer safety issues and provides
independent assurance that fuel cells will meet a rigorous safety
standard. Thus, the incremental costs imposed by this NPRM are expected
to be minimal.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria set forth in Executive Order 13132
(``Federalism''). Any rule resulting from this rulemaking will preempt
State, local, and Indian tribe requirements but will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between the
national government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the
consultation and funding requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not
apply.
Federal hazardous materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5125(b))
expressly preempts State, local, and Indian tribe requirements on
certain covered subjects, as follows:
(1) The designation, description, and classification of hazardous
materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling, labeling, marking, and
placarding of hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and use of shipping documents
related to hazardous materials, and requirements related to the number,
contents, and placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation of hazardous materials; and
(5) The design, manufacture, fabrication, inspection, marking,
maintenance, reconditioning, repair, or testing of a packaging or
container represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use
in transporting hazardous material.
This proposed rule addresses covered subject items (1), (2), (3),
and (5) above and would preempt State, local, and Indian tribe
requirements not meeting the ``substantively the same'' standard.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(2), we would deem federal preemption
effective upon the effective date of the final rule. We are proposing
to make the final rule effective approximately 90 days after it is
published in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria set forth in Executive Order 13175 (``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). Because this proposed
rule does not have tribal implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs, the funding and consultation requirements of
Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities,
unless the agency determines the rule is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
proposed rule will relax regulatory barriers to the transportation of
fuel cells used in personal electronic devices and, accordingly, is
expected to have a positive impact on small businesses that
manufacture, distribute, transport, or use such items. As indicated
above, we expect the incremental costs imposed by this NPRM to be
minimal. Therefore, I certify that, if adopted, the proposals in this
NPRM will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This proposed rule has been developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking'') and DOT's procedures and policies to promote compliance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that potential impacts of
draft rules on small entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, requires
PHMSA to provide interested members of the public and affected agencies
an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping
requests. This NPRM does not include new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$120.7 million or more to either State, local or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Sec. Sec. 4321-4375,
requires that federal agencies analyze proposed actions to determine
whether the action will have a significant impact on the human
environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations
order federal agencies to conduct an environmental review considering
(1) the need for the proposed action, (2) alternatives to the proposed
action, (3) probable environmental impacts of the proposed action and
alternatives, and (4) the agencies and persons consulted during the
consideration process. 40 CFR 1508.9(b).
Purpose and Need
Fuel cells are an emerging energy technology designed to replace,
augment, or recharge existing battery sources. The fuel cell designs
currently under development are powered by one of a variety of
hazardous materials fuels, including methanol and other types of
flammable liquids, butane flammable gas, dangerous when wet hydrogen in
metal hydride, and corrosive liquids containing formic acid or
borohydride materials.
The HMR and the ICAO Technical Instructions already include
provisions for transporting fuel cell systems and fuel cell cartridges
containing flammable liquid as cargo on board aircraft. See 49 CFR
173.230, and Special Provision 146 of the HMR, and Packing Instruction
313 of the 2007-2008 edition of the ICAO Technical Instructions. In
addition, the ICAO also adopted (in Section 8:1.1.2(r)) provisions that
will permit these devices to be fueled by formic acid or butane, and
transported in carry-on baggage on board passenger-carrying aircraft
under certain conditions. This rulemaking proposes to harmonize the HMR
with these additional ICAO requirements. To limit both the safety and
environmental consequences should an incident occur, this rulemaking
also proposes restrictions on the fuel cell system configurations and
limits on the amount of hazardous material contained in each fuel cell
cartridge. There are no significant environmental impacts associated
with this NPRM.
Alternatives
The alternatives PHMSA is considering are as follows:
No action--If no action is taken, passengers would not be permitted
to
[[Page 53748]]
transport personal electronic devices powered by fuel cell technology
in carry-on baggage on domestic flights. The industry views such
authorization as key to continued development and use of this
technology. Without explicit action to permit airline passengers to
carry fuel cell powered devices, technological development could well
be delayed. This action is not recommended.
Actions Proposed in this NPRM--The actions proposed in this NPRM
would harmonize the HMR requirements for fuel cells with those
prescribed in the international regulations. These proposed amendments
are intended to update, clarify, and provide relief from certain
existing regulatory requirements to promote safer transportation
practices, finalize outstanding petitions for rulemaking, facilitate
international commerce, and make the regulations easier to understand.
This action is recommended.
To Regulate All Fuel Cells in the Manner Prescribed in the IEC
Standard--In addition to the materials covered by the proposed rule,
the IEC standard covers fuel cells containing solid Division 4.3
(dangerous when wet) materials. As explained above, this design was not
included in the ICAO standard to which we are proposing to harmonize in
this rulemaking. PHMSA believes those fuel cell designs that have not
been included in the ICAO standards warrant further safety review and
that adopting a standard inconsistent with the international standard
cannot be justified at this time.
Analysis of Environmental Impacts
We regulate hazardous materials transported by aircraft, vessel,
rail, and highway. The potential for environmental damage or
contamination exists when packages of hazardous materials are involved
in accidents or en route incidents resulting from cargo shifts, valve
failures, package failures, or loading, unloading, or handling
problems. The ecosystems that could be affected by a release include
air, water, soil, and ecological resources (for example, wildlife
habitats). The adverse environmental impacts associated with releases
of most hazardous materials are short-term impacts that can be greatly
reduced or eliminated through prompt clean up of the accident scene.
Most hazardous materials are not transported in quantities sufficient
to cause significant, long-term environmental damage if they are
released.
The hazardous material regulatory system is a risk-management
system that is prevention oriented and focused on identifying a hazard
and reducing the probability and quantity of a hazardous material
release. Hazardous materials are categorized by hazard analysis and
experience into hazard classes and packing groups. The regulations
require each shipper to classify a material in accordance with these
hazard classes and packing groups; the process of classifying a
hazardous material is itself a form of hazard analysis. Further, the
regulations require the shipper to communicate the material's hazards
through use of the hazard class, packing group, and proper shipping
name on the shipping paper, labels and markings on packages, and
placards on transport vehicles. Thus the shipping paper, labels,
markings, and placards communicate the most significant findings of the
shipper's hazard analysis. Excluding compressed gases, radioactive
materials, and explosives, which all have their own packaging strength
criteria, a hazardous material is assigned to one of three packing
groups based upon its degree of hazard--from a high hazard, Packing
Group I, to a low hazard, Packing Group III material--except gases and
certain other materials with high integrity packagings. The HMR are
designed to ensure the quality, damage resistance, and performance
standards of the packaging for each hazardous material are appropriate
for the hazards of the material transported.
We have reviewed the risks associated with transporting fuel cell
systems and cartridges. The amount of hazardous material contained
within the fuel cells or cartridges to which this NPRM applies is
minimal, limited to 200 mL or 200 g by this proposal. Even if a large
number of these devices were compromised and their hazardous materials
contents released, the environmental impact of the release would not be
significant. We have determined there will be no significant
environmental impacts associated with this proposed rule.
Consultation and Public Comment
As discussed above, PHMSA consulted with the IEC and many companies
representing the fuel cell industry here and abroad to prepare for U.N.
Dangerous Goods Council meetings on these devices. PHMSA also
participated in the technical review of papers prepared by these
companies explaining the potential risks and measures taken in the IEC
standard to reduce risks for each fuel the IEC standard states may be
present in a fuel cell. In addition, also as discussed earlier, PHMSA
has consulted extensively with the U.S. Fuel Council, Medis
Technologies, Ltd., and Millenium Cell, Inc., in response to their
petitions for rulemaking, numbered P-1475 and P-1483, to permit
passengers and crew to transport in carry-on baggage on board passenger
aircraft fuel cells containing flammable liquid, formic acid, butane,
and Class 8 borohydride materials for use in portable electronic
devices. PHMSA has also received a letter signed by approximately 18
companies supporting the proposed regulation of fuel cells in the HMR.
We invite interested persons to submit comments on the potential
environmental, safety, and other impacts of the proposals subject to
federal regulation in this NPRM.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70;
Pages 19477-78), which may also be found at https://dms.dot.gov, and on
and after September 28, 2007, may be found at https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation, Packaging and containers,
Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Uranium.
49 CFR Part 175
Air carriers, Hazardous materials transportation, Incorporation by
reference, Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we propose to amend 49 CFR
Chapter I as follows:
PART 171--GENERAL INFORMATION, REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 171 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53;
Pub. L. 101-410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 Note); Pub. L. 104-134
section 31001.
[[Page 53749]]
2. In Sec. 171.7, in paragraph (a)(3), in the Table, an entry for
the International Electrotechnical Commission is added in appropriate
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 171.7 Reference material.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source and name of material 49 CFR reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 3,
rue de Varemb[eacute], P.O. Box 131, CH--1211,
GENEVA 20, Switzerland:
Fuel cell technologies--Part 6-1: Micro fuel Sec. 175.10
cell power systems--Safety, IEC/PAS 62282-6-1
First Edition, with Technical Corrigendum 1,
2006...........................................
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
2. In Sec. 171.8, two new definitions for ``fuel cell'' and ``fuel
cell cartridge'' are added in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 171.8 Definitions and abbreviations.
* * * * *
Fuel cell means an electrochemical device that converts the energy
of the chemical reaction between a fuel, such as hydrogen or hydrogen
rich gases, alcohols, hydrocarbons, and an oxidant, such as air or
oxygen, to direct current (d.c.) power, heat, and other reaction
products.
Fuel cell cartridge or Fuel cartridge means a removable article
that contains and supplies fuel to the micro fuel cell power unit or
internal reservoir, not to be refilled by the user.
* * * * *
PART 173--SHIPPERS--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND
PACKAGINGS
3. The authority citation for part 173 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. In Sec. 173.230, paragraph (a) is revised and new paragraph (d)
is added, to read as follows:
Sec. 173.230 Fuel cell cartridges containing flammable liquids.
(a) A fuel cell cartridge must be designed and constructed to
prevent the fuel it contains from leaking during normal conditions of
transportation and be free of electric charge generating components.
* * * * *
(d) Fuel cells intended for transportation in carry-on baggage on
board passenger aircraft must also comply with the applicable
provisions prescribed in Sec. 175.10 of this subchapter.
PART 175--CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT
5. The authority citation for part 175 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
6. In Sec. 175.10, paragraph (a)(18) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crew members, and air
operators.
(a) * * *
(18) Portable electronic devices (for example, cameras, cellular
phones, laptop computers, and camcorders) powered by fuel cell systems,
and not more than two spare fuel cartridges per passenger or crew
member, when transported in carry-on baggage by aircraft under the
following conditions:
(i) Fuel cell cartridges may contain only Class 3 flammable liquids
(including methanol), Class 8 formic acid, Class 8 borohydride
materials, or Division 2.1 butane;
(ii) The maximum quantity of fuel in any fuel cell cartridge may
not exceed:
(A) 200 mL (6.76 ounces) for liquids,
(B) 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) for liquefied gases in non-metallic
fuel cell cartridges, or 200 mL for metal fuel cell cartridges;
(C) 200 g (7 ounces) for solids;
(iii) No more than two spare fuel cell cartridges may be carried by
a passenger;
(iv) Fuel cell systems containing fuel and fuel cell cartridges
including spare cartridges are permitted in carry-on baggage only;
(v) Fuel cell cartridges may not be refillable by the user.
Refueling of fuel cell systems is not permitted except that the
installation of a spare cartridge is allowed. Fuel cell cartridges that
are used to refill fuel cell systems but that are not designed or
intended to remain installed (fuel cell refills) in a portable
electronic device are not permitted;
(vi) Fuel cell systems and fuel cell cartridges must conform to
IEC/PAS 62282-6-1 (IBR; see Sec. 171.7 of this subchapter);
(vii) Interaction between fuel cells and integrated batteries in a
device must conform to IEC/PAS 62282-6-1. Fuel cell systems for which
the sole function is to charge a battery in the device are not
permitted;
(viii) Fuel cell systems must be of a type that will not charge
batteries when the portable electronic device is not in use; and
(ix) Each fuel cell cartridge and system that conforms to the
requirements in this paragraph (a)(18) must be durably marked by the
manufacturer with the wording: ``APPROVED FOR CARRIAGE IN AIRCRAFT
CABIN ONLY'' to certify that the fuel cell cartridge or system meets
the specifications in IEC/PAS 62282-6-1 and with the maximum quantity
and type of fuel contained in the cartridge or system.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 14, 2007, under the
authority delegated in 49 CFR part 106.
Theodore L. Willke,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. E7-18532 Filed 9-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P