Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Biennial Specifications and Management Measures; Correction, 53165-53169 [E7-18364]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Government’s ability to monitor the
contractor’s progress.
Lynn Kopala,
Acting Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. E7–18234 Filed 9–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116–01–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Electronic Access
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
This final rule also is accessible via
the Internet at the Office of the Federal
Register’s website at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Background information and documents
are available at the website of the Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council)
at https://www.pcouncil.org.
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No.070830493–7496–01; I.D.
082806B]
RIN 0648–AV95
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Biennial Specifications and
Management Measures; Correction
Background
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces corrections
to Federal regulations for the West Coast
groundfish fishery. This action corrects
the latitude/longitude coordinates for
the Salmon Troll and South Coast
Recreational Yelloweye Rockfish
Conservation Areas (RCAs) so that they
are published in the proper sequence.
This action correctly announces the
2007 tribal allocation amount of Pacific
whiting. This action clarifies the
application of the Ocean Salmon
Conservation Zone in the Pacific
whiting fishery. This action corrects
some coordinates of the depth contour
line approximations that are used to
define the RCAs. This action is intended
to eliminate any confusion for the
public that may have occurred as a
result of prior incorrect NMFS
publications.
Effective September 18, 2007.
Comments on this rule will be accepted
through October 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AV95 by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: Correction.nwr@noaa.gov.
Include 0648–AV95 in the subject line
of the message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 206–526–6736, Attn: Gretchen
Arentzen
• Mail: D. Robert Lohn,
Administrator, Northwest Region,
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Sep 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE,
Seattle, WA 98115–0070, Attn: Gretchen
Arentzen.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gretchen Arentzen (Northwest Region,
NMFS), phone: 206–526–6147; fax: 206–
526–6736 and; e-mail:
gretchen.arentzen@noaa.gov.
The Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP
and its implementing regulations at title
50 in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), part 660, subpart G, regulate
fishing for over 90 species of groundfish
off the coasts of Washington, Oregon,
and California. Groundfish
specifications and management
measures are developed by the Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council),
and are implemented by NMFS. On
September 29, 2006, NMFS published a
proposed rule (71 FR 57764) to
implement Amendment 16–4 to the
Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP and to
establish the 2007–2008 harvest
specifications and management
measures for groundfish taken in the
EEZ off the coasts of Washington,
Oregon, and California. NMFS accepted
public comment on the proposed rule
and responded to these comments in the
preamble to the final rule, which
published in the Federal Register on
December 29, 2006 (71 FR 78638).
The 2007–2008 groundfish harvest
specifications and management
measures added a new potential closed
area, the Ocean Salmon Conservation
Zone (OSCZ), in the whiting fishery that
could be implemented inseason through
automatic action. Regulations at
§ 660.373(c)(3) define the OSCZ as a
closed area applying to the whiting
fishery; however, it does not state in this
part that the OSCZ is closed only
through automatic action when NMFS
projects the whiting fishery may take in
excess of 11,000 Chinook salmon within
a calendar year. The process for
implementation of this closed area is
properly described in § 660.370(d). A
cross-reference to this automatic action
section is added to the whiting
regulations defining the OSCZ to clarify
that the OSCZ is only closed after NMFS
initiates an automatic management
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53165
action to implement this closed area
based on the projected take of Chinook
salmon.
A range of Pacific whiting (whiting)
harvest specifications and management
measures was adopted in the 2007–2008
harvest specifications and management
measures for groundfish, and final 2007
specifications and management
measures for whiting were adopted in
March 2007. NMFS published a final
rule establishing the 2007 whiting
harvest specifications and management
measures on April 18, 2007 (72 FR
19390), which included the level of the
acceptable biological catch (ABC),
optimum yield (OY), tribal allocation,
and allocations for the nontribal
commercial whiting sectors. The final
2007 tribal allocation was set according
to an abundance-based sliding scale
method, where the tribal allocation
varies with the U.S. whiting optimum
yield (OY) ranging from 14 percent (or
less) of the U.S. OY when OY levels are
above 250,000 mt, to 17.5 percent of the
U.S. OY when the OY level is at or
below 145,000 mt. NMFS had explained
this method in the preamble to the
proposed rule for the 2007–2008
groundfish harvest specifications and
management measures. The tribal
allocation was correctly expressed in
the preamble to that final rule as 32,500
mt, however NMFS did not publish that
amount in § 660.385(e), leaving the
outdated 2006 tribal whiting allocation
of 35,000 mt in current regulations. This
rule corrects 660.385(e) by inserting the
2007 tribal allocation.
The preambles to the proposed and
final rules for the 2007–2008 groundfish
harvest specifications and management
measures described the Yelloweye
Rockfish Conservation Areas (YRCAs),
closed areas intended to protect
overfished species; however, the
regulatory text published the latitude
and longitude coordinates defining the
Salmon Troll YRCA and the South Coast
Recreational YRCA in the incorrect
sequence, resulting in closed areas that
are not the same size or shape as those
analyzed by NMFS, recommended by
the Council, and discussed in the
preamble to the final rule. This
correction re-publishes the YRCA
latitude and longitude coordinates in
the correct sequence to form the closed
areas intended to protect yelloweye
rockfish.
The 2007–2008 groundfish harvest
specifications and management
measures added a new Rockfish
Conservation Area (RCA) boundary line
approximating the 180–fm (32–m) depth
contour off California with
modifications to allow fishing for
petrale sole. After publication of the
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
53166
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
proposed rule, the state of California
requested adjustments to the latitude
and longitude coordinates defining the
petrale-modified 180–fm (329–m)
boundary line to eliminate cross-overs
with other neighboring boundary lines
and to be consistent with boundaries of
groundfish essential fish habitat closed
areas off California. However, these
changes from the proposed rule were
not made and the original incorrect
coordinates were published in the final
rule for the 2007–2008 groundfish
harvest specifications and management
measures. This correction publishes the
latitude and longitude coordinates
defining the petrale-modified 180–fm
(329–m) boundary line at § 660.394(f)
that the state of California proposed and
the Council recommended.
The 2007–2008 groundfish harvest
specifications and management
measures revised coordinates defining
the RCA boundary line approximating
the petrale-modified 250–fm (457–m)
depth contour to eliminate cross-overs
with neighboring RCA boundary lines.
Coordinates defining this RCA boundary
line, published at § 660.394(r),
contained errors off the Washington
coast and were published with these
errors in both the proposed and final
rule. The errors in the coordinates
defining the RCA boundary line were
introduced when transferring the
latitude and longitude coordinates into
the format necessary for publication in
the Federal Register and eliminated a
portion of petrale sole fishing grounds
and opened an area of known rockfish
abundance. This correction publishes
the latitude and longitude coordinates
defining the petrale-modified 250–fm
(457–m) boundary line at § 660.394(r)
that the state of Washington proposed
and the Council recommended.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause to
waive the requirement to provide prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment on this action pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B); providing prior notice
and opportunity for comment would be
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest.
This correction document revises
§ 660.373(c)(3) of the CFR so that the
description of the OSCZ is consistent
with the automatic action regulations, at
§ 660.370(d), for implementing the
OSCZ. Allowing inconsistencies to
remain in the Federal Register would be
contrary to the public interest. It would
leave language in the CFR that implies
that a permanent closure is in place,
even though the closure only exists if it
is implemented through automatic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Sep 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
management action. This automatic
action will be taken when NMFS
projects that the whiting fishery may
take in excess of 11,000 Chinook salmon
within a calendar year. The OSCZ was
analyzed in the 2007–2008 groundfish
specifications and management
measures environmental impact
statement, and is clearly described in
the preambles to the proposed and final
rules (71 FR 57764, 71 FR 78638) as a
closure that NMFS can implement for
the whiting fishery if Chinook salmon
take is anticipated to exceed acceptable
levels. Prior notice and opportunity for
comment was provided earlier because
both the EIS and the proposed rule were
made available for public comment, and
no comments were received pertaining
to the application of the OSCZ. Also,
this correction clarifies language at
§ 660.373(c)(3) to make it consistent
with existing regulations at § 660.370(d)
and does not change the intent,
meaning, or application of the OSCZ
closure. Leaving inconsistencies in the
regulatory language is contrary to the
public interest because it is confusing to
the public and would leave language in
the CFR that implies that a permanent
closure is in place, even though the
closure only exists if it is implemented
through automatic management action;
therefore, NOAA finds good cause to
waive prior notice and opportunity for
public comment.
This correction document revises
§ 660.385(e) of the CFR so that the 2007
tribal allocation of Pacific whiting is
consistent with the allocation proposed
by the tribal representative on the
Council, recommended by the Council
and that NMFS intended to implement.
This correction implements an action
that has already been made available for
public review and comment in the
preamble to the whiting ABC/OY final
rule (71 FR 19390). By implementing
the correct tribal allocation, NMFS is
implementing the 2007 tribal whiting
allocation determined by the
methodology described in the preamble
to the 2007–2008 harvest specifications
and management measures proposed
rule, and listed in the preamble to the
whiting ABC/OY final rule, which was
based on recommendations from the
Makah tribe and the Council. The
numerical allocation, however, was not
changed in the regulatory text, so the
2006 tribal allocation is still listed in the
CFR rather than the 2007 allocation. The
interested public is aware of the current
2007 tribal whiting allocation. The
Makah tribe is aware of the appropriate
2007 tribal whiting allocation and plans
to stay within the 2007 allocation which
they proposed; therefore, prior notice
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and opportunity for public comment is
unnecessary.
This correction document revises
§ 660.390(c) and (d) of the CFR so that
coordinates for the Salmon Troll and
South Coast Recreational Yelloweye
Rockfish Conservation Areas (YRCAs)
are listed in the correct sequence to
form rectangular closed areas. Each of
these closed areas is defined by four
coordinate points. If coordinates are
connected in the sequence listed prior
to this correction, they form bowtie
shaped polygons that close
approximately half of the area of the
rectangular closed areas. When these
points are connected in the correct
sequence, they form rectangular closed
areas, as illustrated in the EIS, described
in the preamble to the final rule,
recommended by the Council, and
approved by NMFS for this action. A
public notice and comment period was
available for the EIS and final rule, and
no comments were received pertaining
to the proposed rectangular shape of the
YRCAs. The YRCAs are designed to
prevent the incidental catch of
yelloweye rockfish, an overfished
groundfish species that co-occurs with
other, more abundant groundfish stocks.
Allowing the YRCA coordinates to
remain in § 660.390 in the incorrect
sequence actually allows, rather than
prevents, fishing in areas of yelloweye
rockfish abundance, which is contrary
to the public interest. The yelloweye OY
is very low so that if even a small
amount of excess incidental catch of
yelloweye rockfish were to occur, all of
the commercial and recreational hookand-line groundfish fisheries north of
Cape Mendocino, California, fisheries
that take yelloweye incidentally, would
have to be restricted or closed early to
ensure that the 2007 yelloweye rockfish
OY is not exceeded. Such restrictions
and/or closures could be expected to
ultimately result in significant revenue
and job losses in coastal communities.
By implementing these corrections as
early as possible in the 2007 fishery,
NMFS is implementing the YRCAs it
had described in the preambles to the
proposed and final rules for this action,
based on recommendations from the
Council. This correction is intended to
ensure that yelloweye rockfish catch is
kept within its allowable harvest levels,
so that NMFS may meet its obligations
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act to
rebuild overfished stocks and to achieve
the optimum yield from the fishery.
Delay in publication of this rule could
cause NMFS to fail to meet these
obligations and would be contrary to the
public interest.
This correction document revises
§ 660.394(f) and (r) of the CFR so that
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
coordinates for the petrale-modified
180–fm (329–m) boundary line and the
petrale-modified 250–fm (457–m)
boundary line are published correctly to
protect overfished species while
allowing targeting opportunities for
more abundant species. The state of
California recommended revising the
petrale-modified 180–fm (329–m)
boundary line after NMFS had
published it in the proposed rule, to
improve consistency with the
boundaries of other neighboring area
restrictions, including essential fish
habitat closed areas. These changes,
however, were not included in the final
rule. These modifications change some
latitude and longitude coordinates, and
remove some coordinate points;
however, the corrected line is similar to
the line that was published in the
preambles to the proposed and final
rule. For clarity, the petrale-modified
180–fm (329–m) boundary line is republished in its entirety in this
correction. Providing prior notice and
opportunity for public comment would
be contrary to the public interest, as it
would allow regulations to remain in
the CFR that are confusing due to
inconsistencies and overlaps between
the groundfish RCA and other area
restrictions, including essential fish
habitat closed areas. The petralemodified 250–fm (457–m) boundary line
was published in the proposed and final
rule with 13 incorrect latitude and
longitude coordinates in the portion of
the line that lies off the northern
Washington coast, south of Cape Alava.
These incorrect coordinates moved the
depth contour approximation shoreward
into shallower waters, with one
coordinate bringing the 250–fm (457–m)
line to a depth shallower than 70–fm
(128–m) which produces an irrational
result. Providing prior notice and
opportunity for public comment would
be contrary to the public interest
because allowing the incorrect
coordinates to remain in the CFR would
allow fishing in an area of shallow water
seaward of the RCA, at depths
associated with high occurrence of
overfished species. Restricting fishing in
areas where overfished species are
found is one of the primary tools
available for keeping fishing mortality of
overfished species within the optimum
yields. Allowing the incorrect RCA
boundary lines to remain in § 660.394
would be contrary to the public interest
as it allows, rather than prevents,
fishing in areas of overfished rockfish
abundance, thereby undermining the
intent of the rule. Furthermore, it would
create confusion due to inconsistencies
between the coordinates published in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Sep 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Federal Register and coordinates
available on the NMFS Northwest
Region website for use in navigation
software. If excessive incidental catch of
overfished rockfish species were to
occur, commercial and recreational
groundfish fisheries that take overfished
groundfish species incidentally would
have to be restricted and possibly be
closed early to ensure that the 2007 OYs
for overfished rockfish species would
not be exceeded. Such restrictions and/
or closures could be expected to
ultimately result in significant revenue
and job losses in coastal communities.
Providing prior notice and opportunity
for public comment is contrary to the
public interest because delay in
implementation of this correction could
result in excess harvest of overfished
species that are found in the area that
should be closed, which could result in
exceeding the rebuilding targets,
premature closure of the fishery, or
both. This would prevent NMFS from
meeting its obligations to rebuild
overfished species or manage the fishery
to achieve optimum yield.
For the reasons discussed above, good
cause also exists to waive the 30 day
delay in effectiveness requirement
under 5 U.S.C. 553 (d)(3).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
Dated: September 12, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons explained in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is corrected
by making the following correcting
amendments:
I
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 660.373, paragraph (c)(3) is
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 660.373 Pacific whiting (whiting) fishery
management.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone.
All waters shoreward of a boundary line
approximating the 100 fm (183 m) depth
contour. Latitude and longitude
coordinates defining the boundary line
approximating the 100 fm (183 m) depth
contour are provided at § 660.393(a).
This closure will be implemented
through automatic action, defined at
660.370(d), when NMFS projects the
Pacific whiting fishery may take in
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53167
excess of 11,000 Chinook within a
calendar year.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 660.385, paragraph (e) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 660.385 Washington coastal tribal
fisheries management measures.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Pacific whiting. The tribal
allocation is 32,500 mt.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. In § 660.390, paragraphs (c)(3) and
(4), and (d)(3) and (4) are revised to read
as follows:
§ 660.390
Groundfish conservation areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) 48°02.00′ N. lat., 125°16.50′ W.
long.;
(4) 48°00.00′ N. lat., 125°16.50′ W.
long.; and connecting back to 48°00.00′
N. lat., 125°14.00′ W. long.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) 46°55.00′ N. lat., 124°49.00′ W.
long.;
(4) 46°58.00′ N. lat., 124°49.00′ W.
long.; and connecting back to 46°58.00′
N. lat., 124°48.00′ W. long.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 660.394, paragraphs (f), and
(r)(6) through (18) are revised to read as
follows:
§ 660.394 Latitude/longitude coordinates
defining the 180 fm (329 m) through 250 fm
(457 m) depth contours.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The 180 fm (329 m) depth contour
between 42° N. lat. and the U.S. border
with Mexico, modified to allow fishing
in petrale sole areas, is defined by
straight lines connecting all of the
following points in the order stated:
(1) 42°00.00′ N. lat., 124°36.37′ W.
long.;
(2) 41°47.79′ N. lat., 124°29.48′ W.
long.;
(3) 41°21.16′ N. lat., 124°28.97′ W.
long.;
(4) 41°11.30′ N. lat., 124°22.86′ W.
long.;
(5) 41°06.51′ N. lat., 124°23.07′ W.
long.;
(6) 40°55.20′ N. lat., 124°27.46′ W.
long.;
(7) 40°53.95′ N. lat., 124°26.04′ W.
long.;
(8) 40°49.96′ N. lat., 124°26.04′ W.
long.;
(9) 40°44.49′ N. lat., 124°30.81′ W.
long.;
(10) 40°40.58′ N. lat., 124°32.05′ W.
long.;
(11) 40°38.82′ N. lat., 124°29.45′ W.
long.;
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
53168
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(12) 40°35.65′ N. lat., 124°30.34′ W.
long.;
(13) 40°37.39′ N. lat., 124°37.00′ W.
long.;
(14) 40°36.03′ N. lat., 124°39.97′ W.
long.;
(15) 40°31.42′ N. lat., 124°40.85′ W.
long.;
(16) 40°30.00′ N. lat., 124°37.12′ W.
long.;
(17) 40°27.36′ N. lat., 124°37.14′ W.
long.;
(18) 40°24.81′ N. lat., 124°35.82′ W.
long.;
(19) 40°22.45′ N. lat., 124°30.94′ W.
long.;
(20) 40°14.00′ N. lat., 124°32.90′ W.
long.;
(21) 40°10.00′ N. lat., 124°23.56′ W.
long.;
(22) 40°06.67′ N. lat., 124°19.08′ W.
long.;
(23) 40°08.10′ N. lat., 124°16.71′ W.
long.;
(24) 40°05.90′ N. lat., 124°17.77′ W.
long.;
(25) 40°02.80′ N. lat., 124°16.28′ W.
long.;
(26) 40°01.98′ N. lat., 124°12.99′ W.
long.;
(27) 40°01.52′ N. lat., 124°09.83′ W.
long.;
(28) 39°58.55′ N. lat., 124°12.32′ W.
long.;
(29) 39°55.74′ N. lat., 124°07.37′ W.
long.;
(30) 39°42.78′ N. lat., 124°02.11′ W.
long.;
(31) 39°34.76′ N. lat., 123°58.51′ W.
long.;
(32) 39°34.22′ N. lat., 123°56.82′ W.
long.;
(33) 39°32.98′ N. lat., 123°56.43′ W.
long.;
(34) 39°32.14′ N. lat., 123°58.83′ W.
long.;
(35) 39°07.79′ N. lat., 123°58.72′ W.
long.;
(36) 39°00.99′ N. lat., 123°57.56′ W.
long.;
(37) 39°00.05′ N. lat., 123°56.83′ W.
long.;
(38) 38°57.50′ N. lat., 123°57.04′ W.
long.;
(39) 38°51.19′ N. lat., 123°55.70′ W.
long.;
(40) 38°47.29′ N. lat., 123°51.12′ W.
long.;
(41) 38°45.48′ N. lat., 123°51.36′ W.
long.;
(42) 38°43.24′ N. lat., 123°49.91′ W.
long.;
(43) 38°41.61′ N. lat., 123°47.50′ W.
long.;
(44) 38°35.75′ N. lat., 123°43.76′ W.
long.;
(45) 38°34.92′ N. lat., 123°42.45′ W.
long.;
(46) 38°19.84′ N. lat., 123°31.96′ W.
long.;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Sep 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
(47) 38°14.38′ N. lat., 123°25.51′ W.
long.;
(48) 38°09.39′ N. lat., 123°24.39′ W.
long.;
(49) 38°10.02′ N. lat., 123°26.73′ W.
long.;
(50) 38°04.11′ N. lat., 123°31.62′ W.
long.;
(51) 38°02.11′ N. lat., 123°31.11′ W.
long.;
(52) 38°00.23′ N. lat., 123°29.51′ W.
long.;
(53) 38°00.00′ N. lat., 123°28.72′ W.
long.;
(54) 37°58.07′ N. lat., 123°26.97′ W.
long.;
(55) 37°50.80′ N. lat., 123°24.47′ W.
long.;
(56) 37°44.21′ N. lat., 123°11.38′ W.
long.;
(57) 37°35.67′ N. lat., 123°01.86′ W.
long.;
(58) 37°23.42′ N. lat., 122°56.78′ W.
long.;
(59) 37°23.23′ N. lat., 122°53.78′ W.
long.;
(60) 37°13.97′ N. lat., 122°49.91′ W.
long.;
(61) 37°11.00′ N. lat., 122°45.61′ W.
long.;
(62) 37°07.00′ N. lat., 122°42.89′ W.
long.;
(63) 37°01.10′ N. lat., 122°37.50′ W.
long.;
(64) 36°57.81′ N. lat., 122°28.29′ W.
long.;
(65) 36°59.83′ N. lat., 122°25.17′ W.
long.;
(66) 36°57.21′ N. lat., 122°25.17′ W.
long.;
(67) 36°57.81′ N. lat., 122°21.73′ W.
long.;
(68) 36°56.10′ N. lat., 122°21.51′ W.
long.;
(69) 36°55.17′ N. lat., 122°16.94′ W.
long.;
(70) 36°52.06′ N. lat., 122°12.12′ W.
long.;
(71) 36°47.63′ N. lat., 122°07.40′ W.
long.;
(72) 36°47.37′ N. lat., 122°03.10′ W.
long.;
(73) 36°24.14′ N. lat., 121°59.45′ W.
long.;
(74) 36°21.82′ N. lat., 122°00.80′ W.
long.;
(75) 36°19.47′ N. lat., 122°05.28′ W.
long.;
(76) 36°14.67′ N. lat., 122°00.88′ W.
long.;
(77) 36°09.34′ N. lat., 121°42.61′ W.
long.;
(78) 36°00.00′ N. lat., 121°35.77′ W.
long.;
(79) 35°56.78′ N. lat., 121°32.69′ W.
long.;
(80) 35°52.71′ N. lat., 121°32.32′ W.
long.;
(81) 35°51.23′ N. lat., 121°30.54′ W.
long.;
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(82) 35°46.07′ N. lat., 121°29.75′ W.
long.;
(83) 35°34.08′ N. lat., 121°19.83′ W.
long.;
(84) 35°31.41′ N. lat., 121°14.80′ W.
long.;
(85) 35°15.42′ N. lat., 121°03.47′ W.
long.;
(86) 35°07.21′ N. lat., 120°59.05′ W.
long.;
(87) 35°07.45′ N. lat., 120°57.09′ W.
long.;
(88) 34°44.29′ N. lat., 120°54.28′ W.
long.;
(89) 34°44.24′ N. lat., 120°57.62′ W.
long.;
(90) 34°40.04′ N. lat., 120°53.95′ W.
long.;
(91) 34°21.16′ N. lat., 120°33.11′ W.
long.;
(92) 34°19.15′ N. lat., 120°19.78′ W.
long.;
(93) 34°23.24′ N. lat., 120°14.17′ W.
long.;
(94) 34°21.47′ N. lat., 119°54.68′ W.
long.;
(95) 34°09.79′ N. lat., 119°44.51′ W.
long.;
(96) 34°07.34′ N. lat., 120°06.71′ W.
long.;
(97) 34°09.43′ N. lat., 120°18.34′ W.
long.;
(98) 34°12.50′ N. lat., 120°18.34′ W.
long.;
(99) 34°12.50′ N. lat., 120°26.11′ W.
long.;
(100) 34°14.02′ N. lat., 120°29.61′ W.
long.;
(101) 34°09.55′ N. lat., 120°37.83′ W.
long.;
(102) 34°05.35′ N. lat., 120°36.23′ W.
long.;
(103) 34°02.21′ N. lat., 120°36.23′ W.
long.;
(104) 34°02.21′ N. lat., 120°33.94′ W.
long.;
(105) 33°56.82′ N. lat., 120°28.30′ W.
long.;
(106) 33°50.40′ N. lat., 120°09.94′ W.
long.;
(107) 33°38.21′ N. lat., 119°59.90′ W.
long.;
(108) 33°35.35′ N. lat., 119°51.95′ W.
long.;
(109) 33°35.99′ N. lat., 119°49.13′ W.
long.;
(110) 33°42.74′ N. lat., 119°47.81′ W.
long.;
(111) 33°51.63′ N. lat., 119°52.94′ W.
long.;
(112) 33°51.62′ N. lat., 119°47.94′ W.
long.;
(113) 33°54.67′ N. lat., 119°47.94′ W.
long.;
(114) 33°57.84′ N. lat., 119°30.94′ W.
long.;
(115) 33°54.11′ N. lat., 119°30.94′ W.
long.;
(116) 33°54.11′ N. lat., 119°25.94′ W.
long.;
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(117) 33°58.14′ N. lat., 119°25.94′ W.
long.;
(118) 33°59.31′ N. lat., 119°20.02′ W.
long.;
(119) 34°02.91′ N. lat., 119°15.38′ W.
long.;
(120) 33°59.04′ N. lat., 119°03.02′ W.
long.;
(121) 33°57.88′ N. lat., 118°41.69′ W.
long.;
(122) 33°50.89′ N. lat., 118°37.78′ W.
long.;
(123) 33°39.16′ N. lat., 118°18.24′ W.
long.;
(124) 33°35.44′ N. lat., 118°17.31′ W.
long.;
(125) 33°31.37′ N. lat., 118°10.39′ W.
long.;
(126) 33°32.71′ N. lat., 117°52.05′ W.
long.;
(127) 32°58.94′ N. lat., 117°20.06′ W.
long.; and
(128) 32°35.48′ N. lat., 117°28.83′ W.
long.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) * * *
(6) 48°01.50′ N. lat., 125°40.00′ W.
long.;
(7) 47°57.00′ N. lat., 125°37.00′ W.
long.;
(8) 47°55.50′ N. lat., 125°28.50′ W.
long.;
(9) 47°58.00′ N. lat., 125°25.00′ W.
long.;
(10) 48°00.50′ N. lat., 125°24.50′ W.
long.;
(11) 48°03.50′ N. lat., 125°21.00′ W.
long.;
(12) 48°02.00′ N. lat., 125°19.50′ W.
long.;
(13) 48°00.00′ N. lat., 125°21.00′ W.
long.;
(14) 47°58.00′ N. lat., 125°20.00′ W.
long.;
(15) 47°58.00′ N. lat., 125°18.00′ W.
long.;
(16) 47°52.00′ N. lat., 125°16.50′ W.
long.;
(17) 47°46.00′ N. lat., 125°06.00′ W.
long.; and
(18) 47°44.50′ N. lat., 125°07.50′ W.
long.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–18364 Filed 9–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Sep 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 070213032–7032–01]
RIN 0648–XC66
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pollock in Statistical
Area 630 of the Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; modification of
a closure.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is opening directed
fishing for pollock in Statistical Area
630 of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This
action is necessary to fully use the C
season allowance of the 2007 total
allowable catch (TAC) of pollock
specified for Statistical Area 630 of the
GOA.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), September 15, 2007,
through 1200 hrs, A.l.t., September 18,
2007. Comments must be received at the
following address no later than 4:30
p.m., A.l.t., September 28, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Comments may be
submitted by:
• Mail to: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802;
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building, 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, Alaska;
• FAX to 907–586–7557;
• E-mail to inseason.fakr@noaa.gov
and include in the subject line and body
of the e-mail the document identifier:
g63plkro3 (E-mail comments, with or
without attachments, are limited to 5
megabytes); or
• Webform at the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions at that site for submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Hogan, 907–586–7228.
NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53169
Management Act. Regulations governing
fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance
with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
NMFS closed the directed fishery for
pollock in Statistical Area 630 of the
GOA under § 679.20(d)(1)(iii) on August
28, 2007 (72 FR 48946, August 27,
2007).
NMFS has determined that
approximately 4,888 mt of pollock
remain in the directed fishing
allowance. Therefore, in accordance
with § 679.25(a)(1)(i), (a)(2)(i)(C) and
(a)(2)(iii)(D), and to fully utilize the C
season allowance of pollock in
Statistical Area 630, NMFS is
terminating the previous closure and is
reopening directed fishing for pollock in
Statistical Area 630 of the GOA. In
accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the
Regional Administrator finds that this
directed fishing allowance will be
reached after 72 hours. Consequently,
NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for
pollock in Statistical Area 630 of the
GOA, effective 1200 hrs, A.l.t.,
September 18, 2007.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the opening of pollock in
Statistical Area 630 of the GOA. NMFS
was unable to publish a notice
providing time for public comment
because the most recent, relevant data
only became available as of September
11, 2007.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
Without this inseason adjustment,
NMFS could not allow the pollock in
Statistical Area 630 of the GOA to be
harvested in an expedient manner and
in accordance with the regulatory
schedule. Under § 679.25(c)(2),
interested persons are invited to submit
written comments on this action to the
above address until September 28, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 18, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53165-53169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18364]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No.070830493-7496-01; I.D. 082806B]
RIN 0648-AV95
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Biennial Specifications and
Management Measures; Correction
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces corrections to Federal regulations for the West
Coast groundfish fishery. This action corrects the latitude/longitude
coordinates for the Salmon Troll and South Coast Recreational Yelloweye
Rockfish Conservation Areas (RCAs) so that they are published in the
proper sequence. This action correctly announces the 2007 tribal
allocation amount of Pacific whiting. This action clarifies the
application of the Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone in the Pacific
whiting fishery. This action corrects some coordinates of the depth
contour line approximations that are used to define the RCAs. This
action is intended to eliminate any confusion for the public that may
have occurred as a result of prior incorrect NMFS publications.
DATES: Effective September 18, 2007. Comments on this rule will be
accepted through October 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AV95 by any of
the following methods:
E-mail: Correction.nwr@noaa.gov. Include 0648-AV95 in the
subject line of the message.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 206-526-6736, Attn: Gretchen Arentzen
Mail: D. Robert Lohn, Administrator, Northwest Region,
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070, Attn: Gretchen
Arentzen.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gretchen Arentzen (Northwest Region,
NMFS), phone: 206-526-6147; fax: 206-526-6736 and; e-mail:
gretchen.arentzen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This final rule also is accessible via the Internet at the Office
of the Federal Register's website at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html. Background information and documents are available at the
website of the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) at https://
www.pcouncil.org.
Background
The Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP and its implementing regulations
at title 50 in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 660, subpart
G, regulate fishing for over 90 species of groundfish off the coasts of
Washington, Oregon, and California. Groundfish specifications and
management measures are developed by the Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council), and are implemented by NMFS. On September 29, 2006,
NMFS published a proposed rule (71 FR 57764) to implement Amendment 16-
4 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP and to establish the 2007-2008
harvest specifications and management measures for groundfish taken in
the EEZ off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. NMFS
accepted public comment on the proposed rule and responded to these
comments in the preamble to the final rule, which published in the
Federal Register on December 29, 2006 (71 FR 78638).
The 2007-2008 groundfish harvest specifications and management
measures added a new potential closed area, the Ocean Salmon
Conservation Zone (OSCZ), in the whiting fishery that could be
implemented inseason through automatic action. Regulations at Sec.
660.373(c)(3) define the OSCZ as a closed area applying to the whiting
fishery; however, it does not state in this part that the OSCZ is
closed only through automatic action when NMFS projects the whiting
fishery may take in excess of 11,000 Chinook salmon within a calendar
year. The process for implementation of this closed area is properly
described in Sec. 660.370(d). A cross-reference to this automatic
action section is added to the whiting regulations defining the OSCZ to
clarify that the OSCZ is only closed after NMFS initiates an automatic
management action to implement this closed area based on the projected
take of Chinook salmon.
A range of Pacific whiting (whiting) harvest specifications and
management measures was adopted in the 2007-2008 harvest specifications
and management measures for groundfish, and final 2007 specifications
and management measures for whiting were adopted in March 2007. NMFS
published a final rule establishing the 2007 whiting harvest
specifications and management measures on April 18, 2007 (72 FR 19390),
which included the level of the acceptable biological catch (ABC),
optimum yield (OY), tribal allocation, and allocations for the
nontribal commercial whiting sectors. The final 2007 tribal allocation
was set according to an abundance-based sliding scale method, where the
tribal allocation varies with the U.S. whiting optimum yield (OY)
ranging from 14 percent (or less) of the U.S. OY when OY levels are
above 250,000 mt, to 17.5 percent of the U.S. OY when the OY level is
at or below 145,000 mt. NMFS had explained this method in the preamble
to the proposed rule for the 2007-2008 groundfish harvest
specifications and management measures. The tribal allocation was
correctly expressed in the preamble to that final rule as 32,500 mt,
however NMFS did not publish that amount in Sec. 660.385(e), leaving
the outdated 2006 tribal whiting allocation of 35,000 mt in current
regulations. This rule corrects 660.385(e) by inserting the 2007 tribal
allocation.
The preambles to the proposed and final rules for the 2007-2008
groundfish harvest specifications and management measures described the
Yelloweye Rockfish Conservation Areas (YRCAs), closed areas intended to
protect overfished species; however, the regulatory text published the
latitude and longitude coordinates defining the Salmon Troll YRCA and
the South Coast Recreational YRCA in the incorrect sequence, resulting
in closed areas that are not the same size or shape as those analyzed
by NMFS, recommended by the Council, and discussed in the preamble to
the final rule. This correction re-publishes the YRCA latitude and
longitude coordinates in the correct sequence to form the closed areas
intended to protect yelloweye rockfish.
The 2007-2008 groundfish harvest specifications and management
measures added a new Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA) boundary line
approximating the 180-fm (32-m) depth contour off California with
modifications to allow fishing for petrale sole. After publication of
the
[[Page 53166]]
proposed rule, the state of California requested adjustments to the
latitude and longitude coordinates defining the petrale-modified 180-fm
(329-m) boundary line to eliminate cross-overs with other neighboring
boundary lines and to be consistent with boundaries of groundfish
essential fish habitat closed areas off California. However, these
changes from the proposed rule were not made and the original incorrect
coordinates were published in the final rule for the 2007-2008
groundfish harvest specifications and management measures. This
correction publishes the latitude and longitude coordinates defining
the petrale-modified 180-fm (329-m) boundary line at Sec. 660.394(f)
that the state of California proposed and the Council recommended.
The 2007-2008 groundfish harvest specifications and management
measures revised coordinates defining the RCA boundary line
approximating the petrale-modified 250-fm (457-m) depth contour to
eliminate cross-overs with neighboring RCA boundary lines. Coordinates
defining this RCA boundary line, published at Sec. 660.394(r),
contained errors off the Washington coast and were published with these
errors in both the proposed and final rule. The errors in the
coordinates defining the RCA boundary line were introduced when
transferring the latitude and longitude coordinates into the format
necessary for publication in the Federal Register and eliminated a
portion of petrale sole fishing grounds and opened an area of known
rockfish abundance. This correction publishes the latitude and
longitude coordinates defining the petrale-modified 250-fm (457-m)
boundary line at Sec. 660.394(r) that the state of Washington proposed
and the Council recommended.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
to waive the requirement to provide prior notice and opportunity for
public comment on this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B); providing
prior notice and opportunity for comment would be unnecessary and
contrary to the public interest.
This correction document revises Sec. 660.373(c)(3) of the CFR so
that the description of the OSCZ is consistent with the automatic
action regulations, at Sec. 660.370(d), for implementing the OSCZ.
Allowing inconsistencies to remain in the Federal Register would be
contrary to the public interest. It would leave language in the CFR
that implies that a permanent closure is in place, even though the
closure only exists if it is implemented through automatic management
action. This automatic action will be taken when NMFS projects that the
whiting fishery may take in excess of 11,000 Chinook salmon within a
calendar year. The OSCZ was analyzed in the 2007-2008 groundfish
specifications and management measures environmental impact statement,
and is clearly described in the preambles to the proposed and final
rules (71 FR 57764, 71 FR 78638) as a closure that NMFS can implement
for the whiting fishery if Chinook salmon take is anticipated to exceed
acceptable levels. Prior notice and opportunity for comment was
provided earlier because both the EIS and the proposed rule were made
available for public comment, and no comments were received pertaining
to the application of the OSCZ. Also, this correction clarifies
language at Sec. 660.373(c)(3) to make it consistent with existing
regulations at Sec. 660.370(d) and does not change the intent,
meaning, or application of the OSCZ closure. Leaving inconsistencies in
the regulatory language is contrary to the public interest because it
is confusing to the public and would leave language in the CFR that
implies that a permanent closure is in place, even though the closure
only exists if it is implemented through automatic management action;
therefore, NOAA finds good cause to waive prior notice and opportunity
for public comment.
This correction document revises Sec. 660.385(e) of the CFR so
that the 2007 tribal allocation of Pacific whiting is consistent with
the allocation proposed by the tribal representative on the Council,
recommended by the Council and that NMFS intended to implement. This
correction implements an action that has already been made available
for public review and comment in the preamble to the whiting ABC/OY
final rule (71 FR 19390). By implementing the correct tribal
allocation, NMFS is implementing the 2007 tribal whiting allocation
determined by the methodology described in the preamble to the 2007-
2008 harvest specifications and management measures proposed rule, and
listed in the preamble to the whiting ABC/OY final rule, which was
based on recommendations from the Makah tribe and the Council. The
numerical allocation, however, was not changed in the regulatory text,
so the 2006 tribal allocation is still listed in the CFR rather than
the 2007 allocation. The interested public is aware of the current 2007
tribal whiting allocation. The Makah tribe is aware of the appropriate
2007 tribal whiting allocation and plans to stay within the 2007
allocation which they proposed; therefore, prior notice and opportunity
for public comment is unnecessary.
This correction document revises Sec. 660.390(c) and (d) of the
CFR so that coordinates for the Salmon Troll and South Coast
Recreational Yelloweye Rockfish Conservation Areas (YRCAs) are listed
in the correct sequence to form rectangular closed areas. Each of these
closed areas is defined by four coordinate points. If coordinates are
connected in the sequence listed prior to this correction, they form
bowtie shaped polygons that close approximately half of the area of the
rectangular closed areas. When these points are connected in the
correct sequence, they form rectangular closed areas, as illustrated in
the EIS, described in the preamble to the final rule, recommended by
the Council, and approved by NMFS for this action. A public notice and
comment period was available for the EIS and final rule, and no
comments were received pertaining to the proposed rectangular shape of
the YRCAs. The YRCAs are designed to prevent the incidental catch of
yelloweye rockfish, an overfished groundfish species that co-occurs
with other, more abundant groundfish stocks. Allowing the YRCA
coordinates to remain in Sec. 660.390 in the incorrect sequence
actually allows, rather than prevents, fishing in areas of yelloweye
rockfish abundance, which is contrary to the public interest. The
yelloweye OY is very low so that if even a small amount of excess
incidental catch of yelloweye rockfish were to occur, all of the
commercial and recreational hook-and-line groundfish fisheries north of
Cape Mendocino, California, fisheries that take yelloweye incidentally,
would have to be restricted or closed early to ensure that the 2007
yelloweye rockfish OY is not exceeded. Such restrictions and/or
closures could be expected to ultimately result in significant revenue
and job losses in coastal communities. By implementing these
corrections as early as possible in the 2007 fishery, NMFS is
implementing the YRCAs it had described in the preambles to the
proposed and final rules for this action, based on recommendations from
the Council. This correction is intended to ensure that yelloweye
rockfish catch is kept within its allowable harvest levels, so that
NMFS may meet its obligations under the Magnuson-Stevens Act to rebuild
overfished stocks and to achieve the optimum yield from the fishery.
Delay in publication of this rule could cause NMFS to fail to meet
these obligations and would be contrary to the public interest.
This correction document revises Sec. 660.394(f) and (r) of the
CFR so that
[[Page 53167]]
coordinates for the petrale-modified 180-fm (329-m) boundary line and
the petrale-modified 250-fm (457-m) boundary line are published
correctly to protect overfished species while allowing targeting
opportunities for more abundant species. The state of California
recommended revising the petrale-modified 180-fm (329-m) boundary line
after NMFS had published it in the proposed rule, to improve
consistency with the boundaries of other neighboring area restrictions,
including essential fish habitat closed areas. These changes, however,
were not included in the final rule. These modifications change some
latitude and longitude coordinates, and remove some coordinate points;
however, the corrected line is similar to the line that was published
in the preambles to the proposed and final rule. For clarity, the
petrale-modified 180-fm (329-m) boundary line is re-published in its
entirety in this correction. Providing prior notice and opportunity for
public comment would be contrary to the public interest, as it would
allow regulations to remain in the CFR that are confusing due to
inconsistencies and overlaps between the groundfish RCA and other area
restrictions, including essential fish habitat closed areas. The
petrale-modified 250-fm (457-m) boundary line was published in the
proposed and final rule with 13 incorrect latitude and longitude
coordinates in the portion of the line that lies off the northern
Washington coast, south of Cape Alava. These incorrect coordinates
moved the depth contour approximation shoreward into shallower waters,
with one coordinate bringing the 250-fm (457-m) line to a depth
shallower than 70-fm (128-m) which produces an irrational result.
Providing prior notice and opportunity for public comment would be
contrary to the public interest because allowing the incorrect
coordinates to remain in the CFR would allow fishing in an area of
shallow water seaward of the RCA, at depths associated with high
occurrence of overfished species. Restricting fishing in areas where
overfished species are found is one of the primary tools available for
keeping fishing mortality of overfished species within the optimum
yields. Allowing the incorrect RCA boundary lines to remain in Sec.
660.394 would be contrary to the public interest as it allows, rather
than prevents, fishing in areas of overfished rockfish abundance,
thereby undermining the intent of the rule. Furthermore, it would
create confusion due to inconsistencies between the coordinates
published in the Federal Register and coordinates available on the NMFS
Northwest Region website for use in navigation software. If excessive
incidental catch of overfished rockfish species were to occur,
commercial and recreational groundfish fisheries that take overfished
groundfish species incidentally would have to be restricted and
possibly be closed early to ensure that the 2007 OYs for overfished
rockfish species would not be exceeded. Such restrictions and/or
closures could be expected to ultimately result in significant revenue
and job losses in coastal communities. Providing prior notice and
opportunity for public comment is contrary to the public interest
because delay in implementation of this correction could result in
excess harvest of overfished species that are found in the area that
should be closed, which could result in exceeding the rebuilding
targets, premature closure of the fishery, or both. This would prevent
NMFS from meeting its obligations to rebuild overfished species or
manage the fishery to achieve optimum yield.
For the reasons discussed above, good cause also exists to waive
the 30 day delay in effectiveness requirement under 5 U.S.C. 553
(d)(3).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
Dated: September 12, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For reasons explained in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is corrected by
making the following correcting amendments:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.373, paragraph (c)(3) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 660.373 Pacific whiting (whiting) fishery management.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone. All waters shoreward of a
boundary line approximating the 100 fm (183 m) depth contour. Latitude
and longitude coordinates defining the boundary line approximating the
100 fm (183 m) depth contour are provided at Sec. 660.393(a). This
closure will be implemented through automatic action, defined at
660.370(d), when NMFS projects the Pacific whiting fishery may take in
excess of 11,000 Chinook within a calendar year.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 660.385, paragraph (e) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 660.385 Washington coastal tribal fisheries management measures.
* * * * *
(e) Pacific whiting. The tribal allocation is 32,500 mt.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 660.390, paragraphs (c)(3) and (4), and (d)(3) and (4) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 660.390 Groundfish conservation areas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) 48[deg]02.00' N. lat., 125[deg]16.50' W. long.;
(4) 48[deg]00.00' N. lat., 125[deg]16.50' W. long.; and connecting
back to 48[deg]00.00' N. lat., 125[deg]14.00' W. long.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) 46[deg]55.00' N. lat., 124[deg]49.00' W. long.;
(4) 46[deg]58.00' N. lat., 124[deg]49.00' W. long.; and connecting
back to 46[deg]58.00' N. lat., 124[deg]48.00' W. long.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 660.394, paragraphs (f), and (r)(6) through (18) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 660.394 Latitude/longitude coordinates defining the 180 fm (329
m) through 250 fm (457 m) depth contours.
* * * * *
(f) The 180 fm (329 m) depth contour between 42[deg] N. lat. and
the U.S. border with Mexico, modified to allow fishing in petrale sole
areas, is defined by straight lines connecting all of the following
points in the order stated:
(1) 42[deg]00.00' N. lat., 124[deg]36.37' W. long.;
(2) 41[deg]47.79' N. lat., 124[deg]29.48' W. long.;
(3) 41[deg]21.16' N. lat., 124[deg]28.97' W. long.;
(4) 41[deg]11.30' N. lat., 124[deg]22.86' W. long.;
(5) 41[deg]06.51' N. lat., 124[deg]23.07' W. long.;
(6) 40[deg]55.20' N. lat., 124[deg]27.46' W. long.;
(7) 40[deg]53.95' N. lat., 124[deg]26.04' W. long.;
(8) 40[deg]49.96' N. lat., 124[deg]26.04' W. long.;
(9) 40[deg]44.49' N. lat., 124[deg]30.81' W. long.;
(10) 40[deg]40.58' N. lat., 124[deg]32.05' W. long.;
(11) 40[deg]38.82' N. lat., 124[deg]29.45' W. long.;
[[Page 53168]]
(12) 40[deg]35.65' N. lat., 124[deg]30.34' W. long.;
(13) 40[deg]37.39' N. lat., 124[deg]37.00' W. long.;
(14) 40[deg]36.03' N. lat., 124[deg]39.97' W. long.;
(15) 40[deg]31.42' N. lat., 124[deg]40.85' W. long.;
(16) 40[deg]30.00' N. lat., 124[deg]37.12' W. long.;
(17) 40[deg]27.36' N. lat., 124[deg]37.14' W. long.;
(18) 40[deg]24.81' N. lat., 124[deg]35.82' W. long.;
(19) 40[deg]22.45' N. lat., 124[deg]30.94' W. long.;
(20) 40[deg]14.00' N. lat., 124[deg]32.90' W. long.;
(21) 40[deg]10.00' N. lat., 124[deg]23.56' W. long.;
(22) 40[deg]06.67' N. lat., 124[deg]19.08' W. long.;
(23) 40[deg]08.10' N. lat., 124[deg]16.71' W. long.;
(24) 40[deg]05.90' N. lat., 124[deg]17.77' W. long.;
(25) 40[deg]02.80' N. lat., 124[deg]16.28' W. long.;
(26) 40[deg]01.98' N. lat., 124[deg]12.99' W. long.;
(27) 40[deg]01.52' N. lat., 124[deg]09.83' W. long.;
(28) 39[deg]58.55' N. lat., 124[deg]12.32' W. long.;
(29) 39[deg]55.74' N. lat., 124[deg]07.37' W. long.;
(30) 39[deg]42.78' N. lat., 124[deg]02.11' W. long.;
(31) 39[deg]34.76' N. lat., 123[deg]58.51' W. long.;
(32) 39[deg]34.22' N. lat., 123[deg]56.82' W. long.;
(33) 39[deg]32.98' N. lat., 123[deg]56.43' W. long.;
(34) 39[deg]32.14' N. lat., 123[deg]58.83' W. long.;
(35) 39[deg]07.79' N. lat., 123[deg]58.72' W. long.;
(36) 39[deg]00.99' N. lat., 123[deg]57.56' W. long.;
(37) 39[deg]00.05' N. lat., 123[deg]56.83' W. long.;
(38) 38[deg]57.50' N. lat., 123[deg]57.04' W. long.;
(39) 38[deg]51.19' N. lat., 123[deg]55.70' W. long.;
(40) 38[deg]47.29' N. lat., 123[deg]51.12' W. long.;
(41) 38[deg]45.48' N. lat., 123[deg]51.36' W. long.;
(42) 38[deg]43.24' N. lat., 123[deg]49.91' W. long.;
(43) 38[deg]41.61' N. lat., 123[deg]47.50' W. long.;
(44) 38[deg]35.75' N. lat., 123[deg]43.76' W. long.;
(45) 38[deg]34.92' N. lat., 123[deg]42.45' W. long.;
(46) 38[deg]19.84' N. lat., 123[deg]31.96' W. long.;
(47) 38[deg]14.38' N. lat., 123[deg]25.51' W. long.;
(48) 38[deg]09.39' N. lat., 123[deg]24.39' W. long.;
(49) 38[deg]10.02' N. lat., 123[deg]26.73' W. long.;
(50) 38[deg]04.11' N. lat., 123[deg]31.62' W. long.;
(51) 38[deg]02.11' N. lat., 123[deg]31.11' W. long.;
(52) 38[deg]00.23' N. lat., 123[deg]29.51' W. long.;
(53) 38[deg]00.00' N. lat., 123[deg]28.72' W. long.;
(54) 37[deg]58.07' N. lat., 123[deg]26.97' W. long.;
(55) 37[deg]50.80' N. lat., 123[deg]24.47' W. long.;
(56) 37[deg]44.21' N. lat., 123[deg]11.38' W. long.;
(57) 37[deg]35.67' N. lat., 123[deg]01.86' W. long.;
(58) 37[deg]23.42' N. lat., 122[deg]56.78' W. long.;
(59) 37[deg]23.23' N. lat., 122[deg]53.78' W. long.;
(60) 37[deg]13.97' N. lat., 122[deg]49.91' W. long.;
(61) 37[deg]11.00' N. lat., 122[deg]45.61' W. long.;
(62) 37[deg]07.00' N. lat., 122[deg]42.89' W. long.;
(63) 37[deg]01.10' N. lat., 122[deg]37.50' W. long.;
(64) 36[deg]57.81' N. lat., 122[deg]28.29' W. long.;
(65) 36[deg]59.83' N. lat., 122[deg]25.17' W. long.;
(66) 36[deg]57.21' N. lat., 122[deg]25.17' W. long.;
(67) 36[deg]57.81' N. lat., 122[deg]21.73' W. long.;
(68) 36[deg]56.10' N. lat., 122[deg]21.51' W. long.;
(69) 36[deg]55.17' N. lat., 122[deg]16.94' W. long.;
(70) 36[deg]52.06' N. lat., 122[deg]12.12' W. long.;
(71) 36[deg]47.63' N. lat., 122[deg]07.40' W. long.;
(72) 36[deg]47.37' N. lat., 122[deg]03.10' W. long.;
(73) 36[deg]24.14' N. lat., 121[deg]59.45' W. long.;
(74) 36[deg]21.82' N. lat., 122[deg]00.80' W. long.;
(75) 36[deg]19.47' N. lat., 122[deg]05.28' W. long.;
(76) 36[deg]14.67' N. lat., 122[deg]00.88' W. long.;
(77) 36[deg]09.34' N. lat., 121[deg]42.61' W. long.;
(78) 36[deg]00.00' N. lat., 121[deg]35.77' W. long.;
(79) 35[deg]56.78' N. lat., 121[deg]32.69' W. long.;
(80) 35[deg]52.71' N. lat., 121[deg]32.32' W. long.;
(81) 35[deg]51.23' N. lat., 121[deg]30.54' W. long.;
(82) 35[deg]46.07' N. lat., 121[deg]29.75' W. long.;
(83) 35[deg]34.08' N. lat., 121[deg]19.83' W. long.;
(84) 35[deg]31.41' N. lat., 121[deg]14.80' W. long.;
(85) 35[deg]15.42' N. lat., 121[deg]03.47' W. long.;
(86) 35[deg]07.21' N. lat., 120[deg]59.05' W. long.;
(87) 35[deg]07.45' N. lat., 120[deg]57.09' W. long.;
(88) 34[deg]44.29' N. lat., 120[deg]54.28' W. long.;
(89) 34[deg]44.24' N. lat., 120[deg]57.62' W. long.;
(90) 34[deg]40.04' N. lat., 120[deg]53.95' W. long.;
(91) 34[deg]21.16' N. lat., 120[deg]33.11' W. long.;
(92) 34[deg]19.15' N. lat., 120[deg]19.78' W. long.;
(93) 34[deg]23.24' N. lat., 120[deg]14.17' W. long.;
(94) 34[deg]21.47' N. lat., 119[deg]54.68' W. long.;
(95) 34[deg]09.79' N. lat., 119[deg]44.51' W. long.;
(96) 34[deg]07.34' N. lat., 120[deg]06.71' W. long.;
(97) 34[deg]09.43' N. lat., 120[deg]18.34' W. long.;
(98) 34[deg]12.50' N. lat., 120[deg]18.34' W. long.;
(99) 34[deg]12.50' N. lat., 120[deg]26.11' W. long.;
(100) 34[deg]14.02' N. lat., 120[deg]29.61' W. long.;
(101) 34[deg]09.55' N. lat., 120[deg]37.83' W. long.;
(102) 34[deg]05.35' N. lat., 120[deg]36.23' W. long.;
(103) 34[deg]02.21' N. lat., 120[deg]36.23' W. long.;
(104) 34[deg]02.21' N. lat., 120[deg]33.94' W. long.;
(105) 33[deg]56.82' N. lat., 120[deg]28.30' W. long.;
(106) 33[deg]50.40' N. lat., 120[deg]09.94' W. long.;
(107) 33[deg]38.21' N. lat., 119[deg]59.90' W. long.;
(108) 33[deg]35.35' N. lat., 119[deg]51.95' W. long.;
(109) 33[deg]35.99' N. lat., 119[deg]49.13' W. long.;
(110) 33[deg]42.74' N. lat., 119[deg]47.81' W. long.;
(111) 33[deg]51.63' N. lat., 119[deg]52.94' W. long.;
(112) 33[deg]51.62' N. lat., 119[deg]47.94' W. long.;
(113) 33[deg]54.67' N. lat., 119[deg]47.94' W. long.;
(114) 33[deg]57.84' N. lat., 119[deg]30.94' W. long.;
(115) 33[deg]54.11' N. lat., 119[deg]30.94' W. long.;
(116) 33[deg]54.11' N. lat., 119[deg]25.94' W. long.;
[[Page 53169]]
(117) 33[deg]58.14' N. lat., 119[deg]25.94' W. long.;
(118) 33[deg]59.31' N. lat., 119[deg]20.02' W. long.;
(119) 34[deg]02.91' N. lat., 119[deg]15.38' W. long.;
(120) 33[deg]59.04' N. lat., 119[deg]03.02' W. long.;
(121) 33[deg]57.88' N. lat., 118[deg]41.69' W. long.;
(122) 33[deg]50.89' N. lat., 118[deg]37.78' W. long.;
(123) 33[deg]39.16' N. lat., 118[deg]18.24' W. long.;
(124) 33[deg]35.44' N. lat., 118[deg]17.31' W. long.;
(125) 33[deg]31.37' N. lat., 118[deg]10.39' W. long.;
(126) 33[deg]32.71' N. lat., 117[deg]52.05' W. long.;
(127) 32[deg]58.94' N. lat., 117[deg]20.06' W. long.; and
(128) 32[deg]35.48' N. lat., 117[deg]28.83' W. long.
* * * * *
(r) * * *
(6) 48[deg]01.50' N. lat., 125[deg]40.00' W. long.;
(7) 47[deg]57.00' N. lat., 125[deg]37.00' W. long.;
(8) 47[deg]55.50' N. lat., 125[deg]28.50' W. long.;
(9) 47[deg]58.00' N. lat., 125[deg]25.00' W. long.;
(10) 48[deg]00.50' N. lat., 125[deg]24.50' W. long.;
(11) 48[deg]03.50' N. lat., 125[deg]21.00' W. long.;
(12) 48[deg]02.00' N. lat., 125[deg]19.50' W. long.;
(13) 48[deg]00.00' N. lat., 125[deg]21.00' W. long.;
(14) 47[deg]58.00' N. lat., 125[deg]20.00' W. long.;
(15) 47[deg]58.00' N. lat., 125[deg]18.00' W. long.;
(16) 47[deg]52.00' N. lat., 125[deg]16.50' W. long.;
(17) 47[deg]46.00' N. lat., 125[deg]06.00' W. long.; and
(18) 47[deg]44.50' N. lat., 125[deg]07.50' W. long.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-18364 Filed 9-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S