Almonds Grown in California; Change in Requirements for Interhandler Transfers of Almonds, 51990-51992 [07-4490]
Download as PDF
51990
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this rule
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on state and local governments.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collections were
previously approved under OMB
control number 0560–0198, but the
package was retired since there are less
than ten respondents annually and the
collections are, therefore, not subject to
the Paperwork Burden Act. The number
of estimated annual respondents is not
increased by this rule.
years, which identifies the average
annual rental value based on the market
data. The market value rent study report
must be prepared by a certified general
appraiser and meet the requirements of
USPAP.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on September
6, 2007.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. E7–18032 Filed 9–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Assistance Program
The changes affect the following
program listed in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance: 10.421—Indian
Tribes and Tribal Corporation Loans.
Agricultural Marketing Service
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 770
Agriculture, Credit, Indians, Rural
areas, Loan programs.
I Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, 7 CFR part 770 is
amended as follows:
Almonds Grown in California; Change
in Requirements for Interhandler
Transfers of Almonds
PART 770—INDIAN TRIBAL LAND
ACQUISITION LOANS
1. The authority citation for part 770
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 25 U.S.C. 488.
2. Amend § 770.2 by revising the
definition of ‘‘rental value’’ in paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
I
§ 770.2
Abbreviations and definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Rental value for the purpose of rental
value write-downs, equals the average
actual rental proceeds received from the
lease of land acquired under ITLAP. If
there are no rental proceeds, then rental
value will be based on market data
according to § 770.10(e)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Amend § 770.10 by revising
paragraph (e)(4)(iii) to read as follows:
§ 770.10
Servicing.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) The borrower provides a record of
any actual rents received for the land for
the preceding 5 years, which will be
used to calculate the average rental
value. This record must be certified by
the Department of the Interior. For land
that has not been leased or has not
received any rental income, the
borrower must provide a market value
rent study report for the preceding 5
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Sep 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0051; FV07–981–
2 FR]
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule revises the
requirements for interhandler transfers
of almonds under the administrative
rules and regulations of the California
almond marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of almonds
grown in California and is administered
locally by the Almond Board of
California (Board). This rule requires
handlers who transfer almonds to other
handlers to report to the Board whether
or not the almonds were treated to
achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella
bacteria (Salmonella). This action will
help the Board track treated and
untreated almonds and facilitate
administration of its mandatory
Salmonella treatment program.
DATES: Effective Date: September 13,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen T. Pello, Assistant Regional
Manager, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Maureen.Pello@usda.gov, or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This final rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule revises the
requirements for interhandler transfers
of almonds under the administrative
rules and regulations of the order. This
rule require handlers who transfer
almonds to other handlers to report to
the Board whether or not the almonds
were treated to achieve a 4-log reduction
in Salmonella. A mandatory treatment
program to reduce the potential for
Salmonella in almonds took effect in
September 2007. This action will enable
the Board to track treated and untreated
almonds and help facilitate
administration of its mandatory
treatment program. This action was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a meeting on March 28, 2007.
Section 981.55 of the order provides
authority for handlers to, upon notice to
and under supervision of the Board,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
transfer almonds to another handler.
Marketing order obligations regarding
volume regulation, when in effect, and
assessments must be fully met and may
be divided between the participating
handlers. Section 981.455 requires
handlers to report to the Board on ABC
Form No. 7, ‘‘Interhandler Transfer of
Almonds,’’ information regarding
interhandler transfers. Paragraph (a) of
that section currently requires the
following information: (1) Date of
transfer; (2) the names and plant
locations of both the transferring and
receiving handlers; (3) the variety of
almonds transferred; (4) whether the
almonds are shelled or unshelled; and
(5) the name of the handler assuming
reserve and assessment obligations on
the almonds transferred.
In August 2006, the Board
recommended a mandatory treatment
program to reduce the potential for
Salmonella in almonds. USDA engaged
in informal rulemaking to implement
the program. A final rule was published
on March 30, 2007 (61 FR 15021).
Beginning in September 2007, handlers
must subject their almonds to a process
that achieves a 4-log reduction in
Salmonella prior to shipment. The
program exempts untreated almonds
that are shipped to manufacturers in the
U.S., Canada, and Mexico who agree to
treat the almonds and untreated
almonds that are shipped outside the
U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
To help track treated and untreated
almonds, the Board met in March 2007
and recommended revising the order’s
administrative rules and regulations to
require handlers to report to the Board
whether or not almonds transferred to
other handlers were treated under the
mandatory treatment program. Handlers
must include an identification number
for each lot transferred. This number
may be a contract number or other
unique handler number that can
identify the lot. Under the mandatory
Salmonella treatment program, handler
records must provide the ability to
differentiate treated from untreated
almonds (§ 981.442(b)(5)). Requiring
handlers to provide lot identification
numbers on their interhandler transfer
forms complements this requirement.
These changes to the interhandler
transfer requirements will help facilitate
administration of the mandatory
Salmonella treatment program.
Paragraph (a) in § 981.455 is revised
accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Sep 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 6,000
producers of almonds in the production
area and approximately 110 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
Data for the most recently completed
crop year indicate that about 52 percent
of the handlers shipped under
$6,500,000 worth of almonds. Dividing
the average almond crop values for
2003–04, 2004–05, and 2005–06 as
reported by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service ($2.105 billion) by the
number of producers (6,000) yields an
average annual producer revenue
estimate of about $350,000. Based on
the foregoing, about half of the handlers
and a majority of almond producers may
be classified as small entities.
This rule revises § 981.455(a) of the
order’s administrative rules and
regulations to require handlers who
transfer almonds to other handlers to
report to the Board whether or not the
almonds were treated to achieve a 4-log
reduction in Salmonella. A mandatory
treatment program to reduce the
potential for Salmonella in almonds
took effect in September 2007. This
action will help the Board track treated
and untreated almonds and help ensure
the integrity of its mandatory program.
Authority for this change is provided in
§§ 981.55 of the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on
affected entities, it merely requires
handlers who transfer almonds to other
handlers to indicate on ABC Form No.
7, ‘‘Interhandler Transfer of Almonds,’’
whether or not the almonds were treated
to achieve a 4-log reduction in
Salmonella. Handlers must also include
a lot identification number for each lot
transferred.
Regarding alternatives to this action,
the Board considered not requiring
handlers to report whether their
transferred almonds were treated to
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51991
achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella.
However, this would not allow the
Board to track treated and untreated
almonds. Thus, the Board unanimously
recommended revising the requirements
regarding interhandler transfers of
almonds.
This action slightly modifies the
reporting requirements for all California
almond handlers. All handlers must
currently report their interhandler
transfers to the Board on ABC Form No.
7, ‘‘Interhandler Transfer of Almonds.’’
This form had been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB No. 0581–0178,
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. This rule
requires that two extra columns be
added to this form. One column allows
handlers to indicate whether or not the
transferred almonds were treated to
achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella.
The second column provides for
inclusion of a lot identification number
for tracking purposes. In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the revised form has
been submitted to the OMB for
approval. Once approved, this
information collection will be merged
into OMB No. 0581–0178. It is estimated
that it will take a handler about 0.5 hour
per response, and that 50 handlers will
respond and submit the form five times
per year. Thus, the total annual
reporting burden for the form is
estimated at 125 hours per year.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by the
industry and public sector agencies.
Additionally, the meetings were
widely publicized throughout the
California almond industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
deliberations on all issues. The Board’s
Food Quality and Safety Committee
discussed this issue on January 30,
2007. The committee recommended the
change to the Board on March 28, 2007.
Both of these meetings were public
meetings and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31759).
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
51992
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Copies of the rule were also mailed or
sent via facsimile to all almond
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 60-day comment period
ending August 7, 2007, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal.
One comment was received during
the comment period in response to the
proposal. The commenter asked if the
same rules and safeguards apply to
almonds imported from other countries.
Almonds are not listed in section 8e of
Act. Thus, imported almonds are not
subject to comparable quality
requirements as those in effect for the
domestic commodity.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed, based on the
comment received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because mandatory
compliance with the Salmonella
treatment program began September 1,
2007, and this rule should be in place
as soon as possible so the Board can
track treated and untreated almonds.
Further, handlers are aware of this
action, which was unanimously
recommended at a public meeting. Also,
a 60-day comment period was provided
for in the proposed rule, and the
comment received was addressed
herein.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Sep 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 981.455 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
I
§ 981.455
Interhandler transfers.
(a) Transfers of almonds. Interhandler
transfers of almonds pursuant to
§ 981.55 shall be reported to the Board
on ABC Form 7. The report shall
contain the following information:
(1) Date of transfer;
(2) The names, and plant locations of
both the transferring and receiving
handlers;
(3) The variety of almonds transferred;
(4) Whether the almonds are shelled
or unshelled;
(5) The name of the handler assuming
reserve and assessment obligations on
the almonds transferred;
(6) Whether the almonds had been
treated to achieve a 4-log reduction in
Salmonella bacteria, pursuant to
§ 981.442(b); and
(7) A unique handler identification
number for each lot.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 7, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 07–4490 Filed 9–10–07; 10:05 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE266; Special Conditions No.
23–206–SC]
Special Conditions: Malibu Power &
Propeller Int’l, LLC, Piper Models PA–
46–310P and PA–46–350P; Installation
of a Full Authority Digital Engine
Control (FADEC) Engine
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Malibu Power & Propeller
Int’l, LLC modified Piper Model PA–46–
310P and PA–46–350P airplanes. The
airplanes, as modified by Malibu Power
& Propeller Int’l, LLC, will have a novel
or unusual design feature(s) associated
with the installation of a full authority
digital engine control (FADEC) engine.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is September 5, 2007.
We must receive your comments by
October 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your
comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, Attn: Rules Docket No. CE266,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
You may deliver two copies to the
Regional Counsel at the above address.
Mark your comments: Docket No.
CE266. You may inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter L. Rouse, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329–
4135; facsimile (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the approval design and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You can
inspect the docket before and after the
comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the
address in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 12, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51990-51992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4490]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0051; FV07-981-2 FR]
Almonds Grown in California; Change in Requirements for
Interhandler Transfers of Almonds
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the requirements for interhandler transfers
of almonds under the administrative rules and regulations of the
California almond marketing order (order). The order regulates the
handling of almonds grown in California and is administered locally by
the Almond Board of California (Board). This rule requires handlers who
transfer almonds to other handlers to report to the Board whether or
not the almonds were treated to achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella
bacteria (Salmonella). This action will help the Board track treated
and untreated almonds and facilitate administration of its mandatory
Salmonella treatment program.
DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen T. Pello, Assistant Regional
Manager, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or E-mail: Maureen.Pello@usda.gov, or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule revises the requirements for interhandler transfers
of almonds under the administrative rules and regulations of the order.
This rule require handlers who transfer almonds to other handlers to
report to the Board whether or not the almonds were treated to achieve
a 4-log reduction in Salmonella. A mandatory treatment program to
reduce the potential for Salmonella in almonds took effect in September
2007. This action will enable the Board to track treated and untreated
almonds and help facilitate administration of its mandatory treatment
program. This action was unanimously recommended by the Board at a
meeting on March 28, 2007.
Section 981.55 of the order provides authority for handlers to,
upon notice to and under supervision of the Board,
[[Page 51991]]
transfer almonds to another handler. Marketing order obligations
regarding volume regulation, when in effect, and assessments must be
fully met and may be divided between the participating handlers.
Section 981.455 requires handlers to report to the Board on ABC Form
No. 7, ``Interhandler Transfer of Almonds,'' information regarding
interhandler transfers. Paragraph (a) of that section currently
requires the following information: (1) Date of transfer; (2) the names
and plant locations of both the transferring and receiving handlers;
(3) the variety of almonds transferred; (4) whether the almonds are
shelled or unshelled; and (5) the name of the handler assuming reserve
and assessment obligations on the almonds transferred.
In August 2006, the Board recommended a mandatory treatment program
to reduce the potential for Salmonella in almonds. USDA engaged in
informal rulemaking to implement the program. A final rule was
published on March 30, 2007 (61 FR 15021). Beginning in September 2007,
handlers must subject their almonds to a process that achieves a 4-log
reduction in Salmonella prior to shipment. The program exempts
untreated almonds that are shipped to manufacturers in the U.S.,
Canada, and Mexico who agree to treat the almonds and untreated almonds
that are shipped outside the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
To help track treated and untreated almonds, the Board met in March
2007 and recommended revising the order's administrative rules and
regulations to require handlers to report to the Board whether or not
almonds transferred to other handlers were treated under the mandatory
treatment program. Handlers must include an identification number for
each lot transferred. This number may be a contract number or other
unique handler number that can identify the lot. Under the mandatory
Salmonella treatment program, handler records must provide the ability
to differentiate treated from untreated almonds (Sec. 981.442(b)(5)).
Requiring handlers to provide lot identification numbers on their
interhandler transfer forms complements this requirement. These changes
to the interhandler transfer requirements will help facilitate
administration of the mandatory Salmonella treatment program. Paragraph
(a) in Sec. 981.455 is revised accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 6,000 producers of almonds in the
production area and approximately 110 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000.
Data for the most recently completed crop year indicate that about
52 percent of the handlers shipped under $6,500,000 worth of almonds.
Dividing the average almond crop values for 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-
06 as reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service ($2.105
billion) by the number of producers (6,000) yields an average annual
producer revenue estimate of about $350,000. Based on the foregoing,
about half of the handlers and a majority of almond producers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule revises Sec. 981.455(a) of the order's administrative
rules and regulations to require handlers who transfer almonds to other
handlers to report to the Board whether or not the almonds were treated
to achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella. A mandatory treatment
program to reduce the potential for Salmonella in almonds took effect
in September 2007. This action will help the Board track treated and
untreated almonds and help ensure the integrity of its mandatory
program. Authority for this change is provided in Sec. Sec. 981.55 of
the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on affected entities, it merely
requires handlers who transfer almonds to other handlers to indicate on
ABC Form No. 7, ``Interhandler Transfer of Almonds,'' whether or not
the almonds were treated to achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella.
Handlers must also include a lot identification number for each lot
transferred.
Regarding alternatives to this action, the Board considered not
requiring handlers to report whether their transferred almonds were
treated to achieve a 4-log reduction in Salmonella. However, this would
not allow the Board to track treated and untreated almonds. Thus, the
Board unanimously recommended revising the requirements regarding
interhandler transfers of almonds.
This action slightly modifies the reporting requirements for all
California almond handlers. All handlers must currently report their
interhandler transfers to the Board on ABC Form No. 7, ``Interhandler
Transfer of Almonds.'' This form had been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and
Specialty Crops. This rule requires that two extra columns be added to
this form. One column allows handlers to indicate whether or not the
transferred almonds were treated to achieve a 4-log reduction in
Salmonella. The second column provides for inclusion of a lot
identification number for tracking purposes. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the revised form has
been submitted to the OMB for approval. Once approved, this information
collection will be merged into OMB No. 0581-0178. It is estimated that
it will take a handler about 0.5 hour per response, and that 50
handlers will respond and submit the form five times per year. Thus,
the total annual reporting burden for the form is estimated at 125
hours per year.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule. As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and duplication by the industry and public
sector agencies.
Additionally, the meetings were widely publicized throughout the
California almond industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in deliberations on all issues. The
Board's Food Quality and Safety Committee discussed this issue on
January 30, 2007. The committee recommended the change to the Board on
March 28, 2007. Both of these meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this
issue.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31759).
[[Page 51992]]
Copies of the rule were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all almond
handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through the Internet
by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period
ending August 7, 2007, was provided for interested persons to respond
to the proposal.
One comment was received during the comment period in response to
the proposal. The commenter asked if the same rules and safeguards
apply to almonds imported from other countries. Almonds are not listed
in section 8e of Act. Thus, imported almonds are not subject to
comparable quality requirements as those in effect for the domestic
commodity.
Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule as proposed, based
on the comment received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because mandatory compliance with the
Salmonella treatment program began September 1, 2007, and this rule
should be in place as soon as possible so the Board can track treated
and untreated almonds. Further, handlers are aware of this action,
which was unanimously recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 60-day
comment period was provided for in the proposed rule, and the comment
received was addressed herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 981.455 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 981.455 Interhandler transfers.
(a) Transfers of almonds. Interhandler transfers of almonds
pursuant to Sec. 981.55 shall be reported to the Board on ABC Form 7.
The report shall contain the following information:
(1) Date of transfer;
(2) The names, and plant locations of both the transferring and
receiving handlers;
(3) The variety of almonds transferred;
(4) Whether the almonds are shelled or unshelled;
(5) The name of the handler assuming reserve and assessment
obligations on the almonds transferred;
(6) Whether the almonds had been treated to achieve a 4-log
reduction in Salmonella bacteria, pursuant to Sec. 981.442(b); and
(7) A unique handler identification number for each lot.
* * * * *
Dated: September 7, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 07-4490 Filed 9-10-07; 10:05 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P