Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 51885-51886 [E7-17905]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA (22 U.S.C. 2778)
and Section 127.11 of the ITAR prohibit
the issuance of export licenses or other
approvals to a person, or any party to
the export, who has been convicted of
violating the AECA and certain other
U.S. criminal statutes enumerated at
Section 38(g)(1)(A) of the AECA and
Section 120.27 of the ITAR. A person
convicted of violating the AECA is also
subject to statutory debarment under
Section 127.7 of the ITAR.
In August 2004, ESI was convicted of
one count of violating Section 38 of the
AECA and the ITAR. Mr. Andrew
Adams, then president of ESI, separately
pled guilty to one count of violating 18
U.S.C. Section 1361 by attempting to
commit depredation against property
manufactured for the United States.
Count one of Mr. Adams’ indictment
(02–CR–262) alleges that he attempted
to export a defense article specifically
designed or modified for use in the S–
65 Sikorsky military helicopter.
Subsequently, the Department of State
statutorily debarred ESI (see 70 FR 189,
September 30, 2005). Because Mr.
Adams is affiliated with the debarred
entity, the presumption of denial for
licenses or other State authorizations
was applied to him as well.
Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA permits
termination of debarment after
consultation with the other appropriate
U.S. agencies and after a thorough
review of the circumstances
surrounding the conviction and a
finding that appropriate steps have been
taken to mitigate any law enforcement
concerns. The Department of State has
determined that ESI has taken
appropriate steps to address the causes
of the violations and to mitigate any law
enforcement concerns. Therefore, in
accordance with Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA, the debarment against ESI was
rescinded, effective July 30, 2007. The
presumption of denial for licenses or
other State authorizations applied to Mr.
Adams has also been lifted. The effect
of this notice is that ESI and Mr. Adams
may participate without prejudice in the
export of defense articles and defense
services subject to Section 38 of the
AECA and the ITAR.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: August 22, 2007.
Stephen D. Mull,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau
of Political-Military Affairs Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E7–17902 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5931]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs;
Statutory Debarment Under the Arms
Export Control Act and the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State has imposed
statutory debarment pursuant to
§ 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR
Parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted
of violating or conspiring to violate
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act, as amended, (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C.
2778).
DATES: Effective Date: Date of conviction
as specified for each person.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Trimble, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance,
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State (202) 663–2980.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of
State from issuing licenses or other
approvals for the export of defense
articles or defense services where the
applicant, or any party to the export, has
been convicted of violating certain
statutes, including the AECA. In
implementing this provision, Section
127.7 of the ITAR provides for
‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person
who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons
subject to statutory debarment are
prohibited from participating directly or
indirectly in the export of defense
articles, including technical data, or in
the furnishing of defense services for
which a license or other approval is
required.
Statutory debarment is based solely
upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United
States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures
outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not
applicable.
The period for debarment will be
determined by the Assistant Secretary
for Political-Military Affairs based on
the underlying nature of the violations,
but will generally be for three years
from the date of conviction. At the end
of the debarment period, export
privileges may be reinstated only at the
request of the debarred person followed
by the necessary interagency
consultations, after a thorough review of
the circumstances surrounding the
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51885
conviction, and a finding that
appropriate steps have been taken to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns,
as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA. Unless export privileges are
reinstated, however, the person remains
debarred.
Department of State policy permits
debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, for reinstatement
beginning one year after the date of the
debarment. Any decision to grant
reinstatement can be made only after the
statutory requirements under Section
38(g) (4) of the AECA have been
satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction
exceptions, may be made to this
debarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of the
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with
the appropriate U.S. agencies. However,
such an exception would be granted
only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular
attention to the following factors:
Whether an exception is warranted by
overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an
exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are
consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United
States; or whether other compelling
circumstances exist that are consistent
with the foreign policy or national
security interests of the United States,
and that do not conflict with law
enforcement concerns. Even if
exceptions are granted, the debarment
continues until subsequent
reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR,
the following persons are statutorily
debarred as of the date of their AECA
conviction:
(1) Leib Kohn, May 22, 2007, U.S.
District Court, District of Connecticut,
Case # 3:04CR125.
(2) Electro-Glass Products, July 13,
2007, U.S. District Court, District of
Pennsylvania, Case# 06–00117–001.
As noted above, at the end of the
three-year period following the date of
conviction, the above named persons/
entities remain debarred unless export
privileges are reinstated.
Debarred persons are generally
ineligible to participate in activity
regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)).
Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the
ITAR, any person who has knowledge
that another person is subject to
debarment or is otherwise ineligible
may not, without disclosure to and
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51886
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
written approval from the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in
which such ineligible person may
benefit therefrom, or have a direct or
indirect interest therein.
This notice is provided for purposes
of making the public aware that the
persons listed above are prohibited from
participating directly or indirectly in
activities regulated by the ITAR,
including any brokering activities, and
in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense
articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations
covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the
Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District
Courts mentioned above, and by citing
the court case number provided.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Michael W. Coulter,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E7–17905 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
MOUs. Such a meeting will be
scheduled in the future at which time a
public session will be held.
The Committee’s responsibilities are
carried out in accordance with
provisions of the Convention on
Cultural Property Implementation Act
(19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). The U.S.Cambodia MOU, the U.S.-Honduras
MOU, the designated lists of restricted
categories, the text of the Act, and
related information may be found at
https://exchanges.state.gov/culprop.
The meeting on October 4–5 will be
closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h).
Dated: August 31, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7–17871 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Advisory Panel to the United States
Section of the North Pacific
Anadromous Fish Commission; Notice
of Public Meeting
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notice of Meeting of the Cultural
Property Advisory Committee
In accordance with the provisions of
the Convention on Cultural Property
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et
seq.) (the Act) there will be a meeting of
the Cultural Property Advisory
Committee on Thursday, October 4,
2007, from approximately 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., and on Friday, October 5, from
approximately 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., at the
Department of State, Annex 44, Room
840, 301 4th St., SW., Washington, DC.
At this meeting the Committee will
conduct its ongoing review function
with respect to the Memorandum of
Understanding Between the
Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the
Kingdom of Cambodia Concerning the
Imposition of Import Restrictions on
Khmer Archaeological Material; and,
with respect to the Memorandum of
Understanding with the Government of
the Republic of Honduras Concerning
the Imposition of Import Restrictions on
Archaeological Material from the PreColumbian Cultures of Honduras. This
meeting is for the Committee to satisfy
its ongoing review responsibility of the
effectiveness of agreements pursuant to
the Act and will focus its attention on
Article II of the MOUs. This is not a
meeting to consider extension of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Advisory Panel to the United
States Section of the North Pacific
Anadromous Fish Commission will
meet on September 27, 2007, via
conference call. This session will
involve discussion of the Fifteenth
Annual Meeting of the North Pacific
Anadromous Fish Commission, to be
held on October 8–12, 2007 in
Valdivostok, Russia. The discussion will
begin at 3:30 p.m. EST and is open to
the public.
Requests for the conference call-in
phone number or for further information
on the meeting should be directed to
Ms. Nicole M. Ricci, Office of Marine
Conservation (OES/OMC), Room 2758,
U.S. Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520–7818. Ms. Ricci can be
reached by telephone at (202) 647–1073
or by Fax (202) 736–7350.
Dated: August 28, 2007.
David A. Balton,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oceans and
Fisheries, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7–17879 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Aviation Proceedings; Agreements
Filed the Week Ending July 6, 2007
The following Agreements were filed
with the Department of Transportation
under the sections 412 and 414 of the
Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49
U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures
governing proceedings to enforce these
provisions. Answers may be filed within
21 days after the filing of the
application.
Docket Number: OST–2007–28672.
Date Filed: July 3, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject: TC12 North Atlantic, Canada,
USA-Europe, Expedited Composite
Resolutions, Intended effective date:
July 1, 2007.
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
[Public Notice 5930]
[Public Notice 5906]
Office of the Secretary
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7–17847 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Applications for Certificates
of Public Convenience and Necessity
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed
Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)
During the Week Ending July 6, 2007
The following Applications for
Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier
Permits were filed under Subpart B
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department
of Transportation’s Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et
seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to
Modify Scope are set forth below for
each application. Following the Answer
period DOT may process the application
by expedited procedures. Such
procedures may consist of the adoption
of a show-cause order, a tentative order,
or in appropriate cases a final order
without further proceedings.
Docket Number: OST–2007–28657.
Date Filed: July 2, 2007.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: July 23, 2007.
Description: Application of McCall
Aviation, Inc., requesting authority to
operate scheduled passenger service as
a commuter air carrier.
Docket Number: OST–2007–28675.
Date Filed: July 3, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51885-51886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17905]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5931]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under
the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has
imposed statutory debarment pursuant to Sec. 127.7(c) of the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (``ITAR'') (22 CFR Parts 120
to 130) on persons convicted of violating or conspiring to violate
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended, (``AECA'') (22
U.S.C. 2778).
DATES: Effective Date: Date of conviction as specified for each person.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Trimble, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs, Department of State (202) 663-2980.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or
other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services
where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of
violating certain statutes, including the AECA. In implementing this
provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ``statutory
debarment'' of any person who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment
are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export
of defense articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of
defense services for which a license or other approval is required.
Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR
are not applicable.
The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant
Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature
of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date
of conviction. At the end of the debarment period, export privileges
may be reinstated only at the request of the debarred person followed
by the necessary interagency consultations, after a thorough review of
the circumstances surrounding the conviction, and a finding that
appropriate steps have been taken to mitigate any law enforcement
concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA. Unless export
privileges are reinstated, however, the person remains debarred.
Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for
reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any
decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory
requirements under Section 38(g) (4) of the AECA have been satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to
this debarment determination on a case-by-case basis at the discretion
of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs,
after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an
exception would be granted only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors:
Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United States; or whether other
compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign
policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do
not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are
granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of
the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily debarred as of the date
of their AECA conviction:
(1) Leib Kohn, May 22, 2007, U.S. District Court, District of
Connecticut, Case 3:04CR125.
(2) Electro-Glass Products, July 13, 2007, U.S. District Court,
District of Pennsylvania, Case 06-00117-001.
As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the
date of conviction, the above named persons/entities remain debarred
unless export privileges are reinstated.
Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in
activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d),
and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person
who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is
otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and
[[Page 51886]]
written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
participate, directly or indirectly, in any export in which such
ineligible person may benefit therefrom, or have a direct or indirect
interest therein.
This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware
that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating
directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including
any brokering activities, and in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S.
District Courts mentioned above, and by citing the court case number
provided.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Michael W. Coulter,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-17905 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P