Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Amendment To Exempt Distribution License No. 20-23904-01E for GE Homeland Protection, Inc., and Request for Exemption From 10 CFC 32.26 Requirements, 51849-51852 [E7-17878]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
bioinformatics at the graduate level and
beyond.
NIBIB and NSF’s Division of
Engineering Education and Centers
(EEC) wish to learn whether the BBSI
Program as originally conceived is
achieving its objectives and programlevel outcomes, and to collect lessons
learned for improvement of program
design and implementation. This shortterm evaluation is expected to provide
information on what educational and
career decisions have been affected by
participation in a Summer Institute,
what elements of the students’ BBSI
affect student outcomes, and how the
program can be improved, e.g., through
changes in specific program-wide
design components, expected outcomes,
proposal review criteria, etc. The survey
data collection will be done on the
World Wide Web.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 30 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Form: 800.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
REspondents: 400 hours, (800
respondents at 30 minutes per
response).
Frequency of Response: Once.
Dated: September 5, 2007.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 07–4444 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
National Science Foundation.
Notice of permits issued under
the Antarctic Conservation of 1978,
Public Law 95–541.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permits issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office,
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
6, 2007, the National Science
Foundation published a notice in the
Federal Register of a permit
applications received. Permits were
issued on September 5, 2007 to:
Sam Feola: Permit No. 2008–007.
Jkt 211001
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Sunshine Act Meeting
AGENDA
9:30 am, Tuesday,
September 18, 2007.
PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington DC
20594.
STATUS: The one item is open to the
public.
MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 5299Y: Most
Wanted Transportation Safety
Improvements—2007 Progress Report
and Update on State Issues.
NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202)
314–6100.
Individuals requesting specific
accommodations should contact Chris
Bisett at (202) 314–6305 by Friday,
September 14, 2007.
The public may view the meeting via
a live or archived webcast by accessing
a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the
NTSB home page at https://
www.ntsb.gov.
TIME AND DATE
Vicky D’Onofrio, (202) 314–6410.
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–17773 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Rennie S. Holt: Permit No. 2008–008.
Sam Feola: Permit No. 2008–009.
David Caron: Permit No. 2008–010.
Sam Feola: Permit No. 2008–011.
Arthur L. DeVries: Permit No. 2008–012.
Dated: September 7, 2007.
Vicky D’Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–4470 Filed 9–7–07; 1:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–M
51849
Unit No. 1, located in Wake and
Chatham Counties, North Carolina.
The proposed amendment would
have revised the technical specifications
pertaining to the narrow range
containment sump water level
instruments to allow different water
level measurement instruments to be
used.
The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on May 22, 2007
(72 FR 28720). However, by letter dated
July 19, 2007, the licensee withdrew the
proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated April 30, 2007, and
the licensee’s letter dated July 19, 2007,
which withdrew the application for
license amendment.
Documents may be examined, and/or
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management Systems
(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the internet at the NRC Web
site, https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS should contact the
NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone
at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of August, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Marlayna Vaaler,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II–
2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–17869 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–400]
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Amendment To Exempt Distribution
License No. 20–23904–01E for GE
Homeland Protection, Inc., and
Request for Exemption From 10 CFC
32.26 Requirements
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,
Unit 1; Notice of Withdrawal of
Application for Amendment to Facility
Operating License
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) has
granted the request of Carolina Power &
Light Company (the licensee) to
withdraw its April 30, 2007, application
for proposed amendment to Facility
Operating License No. NPF–63 for the
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of an amendment to Exempt
Distribution License No. 20–23904–01E
held by GE Homeland Protection, Inc.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51850
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
(hereafter GE). GE currently possesses
Sealed Source and Device (SSD)
Certificate No. NR–0399–D–101–E and
Exempt Distribution License No. 20–
23904–01E that authorizes, under Title
10, Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), Section 32.26, ‘‘Gas and aerosol
detectors containing byproduct
material’’ to distribute intact Entryscan
explosives/narcotics walk-through
detection devices to persons exempt
from licensing under 10 CFR 30.20.
Issuance of the amendment would allow
GE to service the Entryscan devices at
customer sites, and to allow GE to ship
the Entryscan devices in parts for final
assembly at customer sites. Issuance of
the amendment would allow GE to be
exempt from the requirements of 10 CFR
32.26. GE requested this action by
letters dated November 29, 2006 and
May 13, 2007. The NRC has prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in
support of this proposed action in
accordance with the requirements of
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations
Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on the
EA, the NRC has concluded that a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is appropriate with respect to
the proposed action. The amendment
will be issued to the Licensee following
the publication of this FONSI and EA in
the Federal Register.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
II. Environmental Assessment
1.0 Background
The NRC staff has evaluated the
environmental impacts of an exemption
from the provisions of 10 CFR 32.26 and
the amendment to allow GE to service
Entryscan explosives/narcotics walkthrough detection devices at customer
sites, and to allow GE to ship the
Entryscan devices in parts for final
assembly at customer sites.
The Entryscan devices are walkthrough units designed to detect
explosives and narcotics. These units
are used in-doors at high-security
locations, such as airports, seaports,
military facilities, and U.S. Customs
sites. Each unit has a length of 40.00–
56.00 in. (1016.00–1422.40 mm), a
width of 57.43–64.00 in. (1458.72–
1625.60 mm), and a height of 92.50–
102.00 in (2349.50–2590.80 mm). Each
unit contains a solid 10 mCi, Ni-63
encapsulated source mounted in a
ceramic cell having a wall thickness of
0.39 in. (10 mm). The ceramic cell
(detector cell) is mounted inside an
aluminum rectangular box (detector
housing) having dimensions 7.09 x 2.87
x 2.64 in. (180 x 73 x 67 mm) and a wall
thickness of 0.062 in. (1.6 mm); the
detector cell and housing together
comprise the detector head. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
detector head is mounted in the upper
cabinet assembly of the unit. GE
currently possesses Sealed Source and
Device (SSD) Certificate No. NR–0399–
D–101–E and Exempt Distribution
License No. 20–23904–01E that
authorize, under Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section
32.26, ‘‘Gas and aerosol detectors
containing byproduct material’’, GE to
distribute intact Entryscan devices to
persons exempt from licensing under 10
CFR 30.20.
By letters dated November 29, 2006
and May 13, 2007, GE requested an
amendment and exemption to allow GE
Field Service Engineers to remove and
exchange failed detector heads inside
Entryscan units at customer sites, and to
allow GE to distribute the Entryscan
units in parts for final assembly at the
customer sites.
2.0 Proposed Action
The proposed action is to issue an
amendment to License No. 20–23904–
01E and an exemption from 10 CFR
32.26 to allow GE Field Service
Engineers to service Entryscan
explosives/narcotics walk-through
detection devices at customer sites, and
to allow GE to ship the Entryscan
devices in parts for final assembly at
customer sites. Specifically, the
proposed action regarding servicing is to
permit GE Field Service Engineers to
remove and replace a failed detector
head at a customer site, rather than
requiring the entire Entryscan unit be
returned to a GE distribution facility for
repair. The proposed action regarding
shipping is to permit GE to ship an
Entryscan unit in parts from the GE
distribution facility, with the upper
cabinet assembly containing the
mounted detector head shipped in a
separate crate, rather than requiring that
the entire Entryscan unit be shipped
from the licensed distribution facility as
one fully assembled unit.
There are over 300 Entryscan units
that are currently deployed, or have the
potential to be deployed, throughout all
Agreement and Non-Agreement States.
GE currently estimates that to replace a
failed detector head at the customer site
would take approximately one (1) hour
in accordance with this exemption. GE
would ship a new detector head to the
customer site, where a GE Field Service
Engineer would perform the
replacement. The detector head would
not be opened during the servicing; the
radioactive sealed source would not be
accessed, handled directly, or
manipulated in any manner at the
customer site. The failed detector head
would then be returned to a licensed GE
facility for disassembly and repair.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GE would ship the Entryscan units
that have been crated in parts. It would
take five to seven business days to
deliver and install an Entryscan unit in
the United States that has been crated in
parts for shipment. The detector head
would remain mounted and not be
removed from the upper cabinet
assembly at any time during the
shipping and final assembly at the
customer site. GE Field Service
Engineers would perform the proposed
installation and final assembly.
2.1 Need for Proposed Action
Regarding servicing, on occasion, the
detector head may fail due to an
electrical or mechanical malfunction.
The Entryscan unit is not operational
when this happens and the impacted
security lane at the customer site must
be taken out of service until the repairs
can be made. This causes interruption to
the explosives and narcotics detection
capabilities at these locations. In the
event of a failed detector head requiring
replacement, this exemption would
allow GE to ship a replacement sealed
detector head directly to the customer
site, replace the non-functioning
detector head at the customer site, then
physically ship the non-functioning
detector head back to the GE
distribution facility for repair. This
would also minimize the Entryscan
unit’s downtime and the loss of security
service at the customer site by allowing
GE to return the inoperative unit to
service within a few days, as opposed to
within ten to fourteen days, which is the
case if the entire unit is returned to the
manufacturing facility for repair.
Regarding shipment in parts, a fully
assembled and crated Entryscan unit
weighs up to 875 pounds. A fully
assembled Entryscan unit is too large to
deliver into most buildings. Its height
impacts its ability to fit through a
standard loading dock and its width
impacts its ability to be moved to a
point of use within a building.
Additionally, a fully assembled
Entryscan unit would pose a significant
risk of injury to personnel handling the
unit. This exemption would allow
delivery of the unassembled unit to the
location of use at the customer site.
2.2 Environmental Impacts of
Proposed Action
10 CFR 32.26 establishes the
requirements for the distribution of gas
and aerosol detectors containing
byproduct material to persons exempt
from licensing under 10 CFR 30.20.
Products licensed under 10 CFR 32.26
are required to meet the safety criteria
defined under 10 CFR 32.27 to ensure
the protection of public health and
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
safety and the environment under
normal and severe use, handling,
storage, and disposal of the products.
The intact Entryscan unit has been
evaluated and licensed under SSD
Certificate No. NR–0399–D–101–E and
Exempt Distribution License No. 20–
23904–01E to meet such criteria. The
affected environments would be the
immediate vicinity of the Entryscan
units and the GE distribution facilities.
Each Entryscan unit contains a solid
10 mCi, Ni–63 encapsulated source
mounted into the ceramic detector cell
having a wall thickness of 0.39 in. (10
mm). The detector cell is mounted
inside the detector housing that has a
wall thickness of 0.062 in. (1.6 mm).
After assembly during manufacturing,
GE leak tests each detector cell for
removable contamination. The detector
head, comprised of the detector cell and
housing, is mounted in the upper
cabinet assembly of the unit and is not
removable nor accessible to the user.
Due to the shielding of the betaradiation components of the detector
cell with ceramic, and the aluminum
housing, there is no possibility of
contamination on any accessible surface
of the detector housing or the external
surface of the device. There is a very
low probability of a beta particle from
Ni–63 penetrating the ceramic detector
cell. Additionally, the detector housing
passed impact, puncture, pressure,
vibration, and temperature prototype
testing in accordance with International
Standard ISO 2919, ‘‘Radiation
protection—sealed radioactive
sources—General requirements and
classification’’ for normal use and likely
accident conditions. However, accidents
during servicing are not likely. GE Field
Service Engineers have been trained to
safely and properly handle, install, and
secure detector heads during servicing.
Through the licensing and SSD
evaluation process, GE demonstrated
that the Entryscan units meet the safety
criteria for licensing under 10 CFR
32.26. The NRC therefore issued GE SSD
Certificate No. NR–0399–D–101–E and
Exempt Distribution License No. 20–
23904–01E that authorizes GE to
distribute the Entryscan devices to
persons exempt from licensing under 10
CFR 30.20.
The Entryscan units would be
serviced and assembled at, or very near,
the indoor security checkpoints at the
customer sites. During the replacement
of the detector head and assembly of a
unit, GE would cordon off the unit and
place the security checkpoint lane out of
service to prevent access to the general
public. GE would verify that the work
area is secured via cones or barriers
before beginning work. Additionally,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
security staff at customer sites would
impose traffic controls to prevent access
to the cordoned off area. GE would
maintain control of the detector head
during servicing and final assembly at
the customer site. The detector head
would not be opened during the
servicing or assembly of the unit; the
radioactive sealed source would not be
accessed, handled directly, or
manipulated in any manner at the
customer site. The detector head would
not be left unattended during the
replacement or assembly of the unit.
One non-radiological impact during
the replacement of a detector head at the
site may be an electrical hazard; the
outer panels of the Entryscan unit may
be taken off while the unit is electrically
energized. This electrical hazard is
minimized by proper use of LockoutTagout procedures. A second nonradiological impact during the shipment
of the unit in parts and assembling at
the customer site may be a risk for
bodily injury to personnel assembling
the unit at the point of use, although the
risk would be lower than that posed if
the unit were shipped in one piece.
Contracted rigging crews would assist in
the assembly of the unit at the customer
site under the supervision of GE. A third
non-radiological impact may be a risk of
electrical shock during assembly. This
electrical hazard is also minimized by
proper use of Lockout-Tagout
procedures. As discussed above, GE and
security staff at the customer site would
impose proper access restrictions,
minimizing the risk to persons around
the unit during replacement of a
detector head and assembly of a unit. A
fourth non-radiological impact may be
the effects of security lane closure
during servicing and assembly, which
may cause delay in the security
screening of people; a detector head
would be replaced in approximately one
hour.
The NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action will not impact the
quality of water resources because the
Entryscan units would be located
indoors. The NRC staff has also
determined that the proposed request
will not impact geology, soils, air
quality, demography, biota, and cultural
and historic resources under normal and
severe handling, storage, use, and
disposal. The NRC has determined that
the benefits of this exemption exceed
the radiological risks and risks of nonradiological impacts.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3.0
51851
Alternatives to Proposed Action
3.1 Alternative 1: License Units Under
General License Regulations
The first alternative would be to
license the distribution of the Entryscan
units under the equivalent Agreement
State regulation of 10 CFR 32.51 for
Generally Licensed Items, which would
allow GE to service the units at
customer sites and ship the units in
parts.
3.2 Alternative 2: Dispose of Defective
Units
A second alternative would be to
dispose defective Entryscan units as
normal waste as allowed for products
distributed under 10 CFR 32.26, rather
than repair the units for further use, and
to ship the units in one piece.
3.3 Alternative 3: No-Action
Alternative
The No-Action Alternative would be
the denial of the proposed action. Under
this alternative, GE would not be able to
replace defective detector heads at
customer sites, and would not be able to
ship the units under their Exempt
Distribution License. GE would
therefore need to license the units under
General License regulations.
4.0 Environmental Impacts of
Alternatives
4.1 Alternative 1: License Units Under
General License Regulations
The environmental impacts for the
first alternative would be the same as for
the proposed action. However, this
alternative would increase the
administrative and regulatory burden on
the licensee, customers, and regulatory
authorities. The additional burden
would be requiring more frequent
reporting by the licensee, requiring the
end-users to appoint a person
knowledgeable of pertinent regulations,
requiring the end-users to leak test the
units, and requiring the regulator to
track the units.
4.2 Alternative 2: Dispose of Defective
Units
The environmental impacts for the
second alternative would be an
increased level of contamination in the
normal waste stream at customer sites,
since the Entryscan units would be
allowed to be disposed of as regular
waste as allowed with exempt
household smoke detectors licensed for
distribution under 10 CFR 32.26.
4.3 Alternative 3: No-Action
Alternative
The environmental impacts for the
No-Action Alternative would be the
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51852
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
same as for the first alternative and the
proposed action. The burden, however,
on the licensee, end-users, and
regulators would be greater than that of
the proposed action by requiring more
frequent reporting by the licensee,
requiring the end-users to appoint a
person knowledgeable of pertinent
regulations, requiring the end-users to
leak test the units, and requiring the
regulator to track the units.
5.0
Agencies and Persons Contacted
GE has distribution facilities located
in Wilmington, MA, Newark, CA, and
Lincolnton, NC. NRC contacted the
radiation control programs of the States
of Massachusetts, California, and North
Carolina. These states had no objection
to the proposed action in this EA.
NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action will not affect listed
species or critical habitat. Therefore, no
further consultation is required under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Likewise, NRC staff have
determined that the proposed action is
not the type of activity that has potential
to cause effects on historic properties.
Therefore, no further consultation is
required under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
6.0
Conclusion
The action that NRC is considering is
to issue an amendment to License No.
20–23904–01E and an exemption from
10 CFR 32.26 to allow GE Field Service
Engineers to service Entryscan
explosives/narcotics walk-through
detection devices at customer sites, and
to allow GE to ship the Entryscan
devices in parts for final assembly at
customer sites. The NRC staff
considered the environmental
consequences of approving the license
amendment and exemption, and has
determined that the approval will have
no adverse effect on public health and
safety or the environment. Therefore,
the NRC staff concludes that the
proposed action is the preferred
alternative, the environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action do
not warrant denial of the license
amendment and exemption request.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
7.0
Finding of No Significant Impact
The Commission has prepared this EA
related to GE’s exemption request. On
the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that
there are no significant environmental
impacts from the proposed action, and
that preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that a Finding of No Significant Impact
is appropriate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
8.0 References
1. SSD Certificate No. NR–0399–D–
101–E.
2. NRC License No. 20–23904–01E.
3. GE letters dated November 29, 2006
and May 13, 2007, with enclosures
thereto.
IV. Further Information
Questions regarding this action may
be directed to Duncan White at (301)
415–2598 or by e-mail at ADW@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 17th day
of August, 2007.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Janet Schlueter,
Director, Division of Materials Safety and
State Agreements, Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental Management
Programs.
[FR Doc. E7–17878 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Federal Register Notice
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
DATES: Weeks of September 10, 17, 24,
October 1, 8, 15, 2007.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Week of September 10, 2007
There are no meetings scheduled for
the Week of September 10, 2007.
Week of September 17, 2007—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the Week of September 17, 2007.
Week of September 24, 2007—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the Week of September 24, 2007.
Week of October 1, 2007—Tentative
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
9:30 a.m.
Periodic Briefing on Security Issues
(Closed—Ex. 1 & 3).
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
2 p.m.
Briefing on NRC’s International
Programs, Performance, and Plans
(Public Meeting) (Contact: Karen
Henderson, 301–415–0202).
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
Week of October 8, 2007—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the Week of October 8, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Week of October 15, 2007—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the Week of October 15, 2007.
*The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Michelle Schroll, (301) 415–1662.
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html.
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.,
braille, large print), please notify the
NRC’s Disability Program Coordinator,
Rohn Brown, at 301–492–2279, TDD:
301–415–2100, or by e-mail at
REB3@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
This notice is distributed by mail to
several hundred subscribers; if you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969).
In addition, distribution of this meeting
notice over the Internet system is
available. If you are interested in
receiving this Commission meeting
schedule electronically, please send an
electronic message to dkw@nrc.gov.
Dated: September 6, 2007.
R. Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–4468 Filed 9–7–07; 11:33 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Biweekly Notice; Applications and
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses Involving No Significant
Hazards Considerations
I. Background
Pursuant to section 189a. (2) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission or NRC
staff) is publishing this regular biweekly
notice. The Act requires the
Commission publish notice of any
amendments issued, or proposed to be
issued and grants the Commission the
authority to issue and make
immediately effective any amendment
to an operating license upon a
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51849-51852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17878]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for
Amendment To Exempt Distribution License No. 20-23904-01E for GE
Homeland Protection, Inc., and Request for Exemption From 10 CFC 32.26
Requirements
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of an amendment to Exempt Distribution License No. 20-23904-
01E held by GE Homeland Protection, Inc.
[[Page 51850]]
(hereafter GE). GE currently possesses Sealed Source and Device (SSD)
Certificate No. NR-0399-D-101-E and Exempt Distribution License No. 20-
23904-01E that authorizes, under Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), Section 32.26, ``Gas and aerosol detectors containing
byproduct material'' to distribute intact Entryscan explosives/
narcotics walk-through detection devices to persons exempt from
licensing under 10 CFR 30.20. Issuance of the amendment would allow GE
to service the Entryscan devices at customer sites, and to allow GE to
ship the Entryscan devices in parts for final assembly at customer
sites. Issuance of the amendment would allow GE to be exempt from the
requirements of 10 CFR 32.26. GE requested this action by letters dated
November 29, 2006 and May 13, 2007. The NRC has prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of this proposed action in
accordance with the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on the EA, the NRC has
concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is
appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The amendment will be
issued to the Licensee following the publication of this FONSI and EA
in the Federal Register.
II. Environmental Assessment
1.0 Background
The NRC staff has evaluated the environmental impacts of an
exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR 32.26 and the amendment to
allow GE to service Entryscan explosives/narcotics walk-through
detection devices at customer sites, and to allow GE to ship the
Entryscan devices in parts for final assembly at customer sites.
The Entryscan devices are walk-through units designed to detect
explosives and narcotics. These units are used in-doors at high-
security locations, such as airports, seaports, military facilities,
and U.S. Customs sites. Each unit has a length of 40.00-56.00 in.
(1016.00-1422.40 mm), a width of 57.43-64.00 in. (1458.72-1625.60 mm),
and a height of 92.50-102.00 in (2349.50-2590.80 mm). Each unit
contains a solid 10 mCi, Ni-63 encapsulated source mounted in a ceramic
cell having a wall thickness of 0.39 in. (10 mm). The ceramic cell
(detector cell) is mounted inside an aluminum rectangular box (detector
housing) having dimensions 7.09 x 2.87 x 2.64 in. (180 x 73 x 67 mm)
and a wall thickness of 0.062 in. (1.6 mm); the detector cell and
housing together comprise the detector head. The detector head is
mounted in the upper cabinet assembly of the unit. GE currently
possesses Sealed Source and Device (SSD) Certificate No. NR-0399-D-101-
E and Exempt Distribution License No. 20-23904-01E that authorize,
under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section
32.26, ``Gas and aerosol detectors containing byproduct material'', GE
to distribute intact Entryscan devices to persons exempt from licensing
under 10 CFR 30.20.
By letters dated November 29, 2006 and May 13, 2007, GE requested
an amendment and exemption to allow GE Field Service Engineers to
remove and exchange failed detector heads inside Entryscan units at
customer sites, and to allow GE to distribute the Entryscan units in
parts for final assembly at the customer sites.
2.0 Proposed Action
The proposed action is to issue an amendment to License No. 20-
23904-01E and an exemption from 10 CFR 32.26 to allow GE Field Service
Engineers to service Entryscan explosives/narcotics walk-through
detection devices at customer sites, and to allow GE to ship the
Entryscan devices in parts for final assembly at customer sites.
Specifically, the proposed action regarding servicing is to permit GE
Field Service Engineers to remove and replace a failed detector head at
a customer site, rather than requiring the entire Entryscan unit be
returned to a GE distribution facility for repair. The proposed action
regarding shipping is to permit GE to ship an Entryscan unit in parts
from the GE distribution facility, with the upper cabinet assembly
containing the mounted detector head shipped in a separate crate,
rather than requiring that the entire Entryscan unit be shipped from
the licensed distribution facility as one fully assembled unit.
There are over 300 Entryscan units that are currently deployed, or
have the potential to be deployed, throughout all Agreement and Non-
Agreement States. GE currently estimates that to replace a failed
detector head at the customer site would take approximately one (1)
hour in accordance with this exemption. GE would ship a new detector
head to the customer site, where a GE Field Service Engineer would
perform the replacement. The detector head would not be opened during
the servicing; the radioactive sealed source would not be accessed,
handled directly, or manipulated in any manner at the customer site.
The failed detector head would then be returned to a licensed GE
facility for disassembly and repair.
GE would ship the Entryscan units that have been crated in parts.
It would take five to seven business days to deliver and install an
Entryscan unit in the United States that has been crated in parts for
shipment. The detector head would remain mounted and not be removed
from the upper cabinet assembly at any time during the shipping and
final assembly at the customer site. GE Field Service Engineers would
perform the proposed installation and final assembly.
2.1 Need for Proposed Action
Regarding servicing, on occasion, the detector head may fail due to
an electrical or mechanical malfunction. The Entryscan unit is not
operational when this happens and the impacted security lane at the
customer site must be taken out of service until the repairs can be
made. This causes interruption to the explosives and narcotics
detection capabilities at these locations. In the event of a failed
detector head requiring replacement, this exemption would allow GE to
ship a replacement sealed detector head directly to the customer site,
replace the non-functioning detector head at the customer site, then
physically ship the non-functioning detector head back to the GE
distribution facility for repair. This would also minimize the
Entryscan unit's downtime and the loss of security service at the
customer site by allowing GE to return the inoperative unit to service
within a few days, as opposed to within ten to fourteen days, which is
the case if the entire unit is returned to the manufacturing facility
for repair.
Regarding shipment in parts, a fully assembled and crated Entryscan
unit weighs up to 875 pounds. A fully assembled Entryscan unit is too
large to deliver into most buildings. Its height impacts its ability to
fit through a standard loading dock and its width impacts its ability
to be moved to a point of use within a building. Additionally, a fully
assembled Entryscan unit would pose a significant risk of injury to
personnel handling the unit. This exemption would allow delivery of the
unassembled unit to the location of use at the customer site.
2.2 Environmental Impacts of Proposed Action
10 CFR 32.26 establishes the requirements for the distribution of
gas and aerosol detectors containing byproduct material to persons
exempt from licensing under 10 CFR 30.20. Products licensed under 10
CFR 32.26 are required to meet the safety criteria defined under 10 CFR
32.27 to ensure the protection of public health and
[[Page 51851]]
safety and the environment under normal and severe use, handling,
storage, and disposal of the products. The intact Entryscan unit has
been evaluated and licensed under SSD Certificate No. NR-0399-D-101-E
and Exempt Distribution License No. 20-23904-01E to meet such criteria.
The affected environments would be the immediate vicinity of the
Entryscan units and the GE distribution facilities.
Each Entryscan unit contains a solid 10 mCi, Ni-63 encapsulated
source mounted into the ceramic detector cell having a wall thickness
of 0.39 in. (10 mm). The detector cell is mounted inside the detector
housing that has a wall thickness of 0.062 in. (1.6 mm). After assembly
during manufacturing, GE leak tests each detector cell for removable
contamination. The detector head, comprised of the detector cell and
housing, is mounted in the upper cabinet assembly of the unit and is
not removable nor accessible to the user. Due to the shielding of the
beta-radiation components of the detector cell with ceramic, and the
aluminum housing, there is no possibility of contamination on any
accessible surface of the detector housing or the external surface of
the device. There is a very low probability of a beta particle from Ni-
63 penetrating the ceramic detector cell. Additionally, the detector
housing passed impact, puncture, pressure, vibration, and temperature
prototype testing in accordance with International Standard ISO 2919,
``Radiation protection--sealed radioactive sources--General
requirements and classification'' for normal use and likely accident
conditions. However, accidents during servicing are not likely. GE
Field Service Engineers have been trained to safely and properly
handle, install, and secure detector heads during servicing. Through
the licensing and SSD evaluation process, GE demonstrated that the
Entryscan units meet the safety criteria for licensing under 10 CFR
32.26. The NRC therefore issued GE SSD Certificate No. NR-0399-D-101-E
and Exempt Distribution License No. 20-23904-01E that authorizes GE to
distribute the Entryscan devices to persons exempt from licensing under
10 CFR 30.20.
The Entryscan units would be serviced and assembled at, or very
near, the indoor security checkpoints at the customer sites. During the
replacement of the detector head and assembly of a unit, GE would
cordon off the unit and place the security checkpoint lane out of
service to prevent access to the general public. GE would verify that
the work area is secured via cones or barriers before beginning work.
Additionally, security staff at customer sites would impose traffic
controls to prevent access to the cordoned off area. GE would maintain
control of the detector head during servicing and final assembly at the
customer site. The detector head would not be opened during the
servicing or assembly of the unit; the radioactive sealed source would
not be accessed, handled directly, or manipulated in any manner at the
customer site. The detector head would not be left unattended during
the replacement or assembly of the unit.
One non-radiological impact during the replacement of a detector
head at the site may be an electrical hazard; the outer panels of the
Entryscan unit may be taken off while the unit is electrically
energized. This electrical hazard is minimized by proper use of
Lockout-Tagout procedures. A second non-radiological impact during the
shipment of the unit in parts and assembling at the customer site may
be a risk for bodily injury to personnel assembling the unit at the
point of use, although the risk would be lower than that posed if the
unit were shipped in one piece. Contracted rigging crews would assist
in the assembly of the unit at the customer site under the supervision
of GE. A third non-radiological impact may be a risk of electrical
shock during assembly. This electrical hazard is also minimized by
proper use of Lockout-Tagout procedures. As discussed above, GE and
security staff at the customer site would impose proper access
restrictions, minimizing the risk to persons around the unit during
replacement of a detector head and assembly of a unit. A fourth non-
radiological impact may be the effects of security lane closure during
servicing and assembly, which may cause delay in the security screening
of people; a detector head would be replaced in approximately one hour.
The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not
impact the quality of water resources because the Entryscan units would
be located indoors. The NRC staff has also determined that the proposed
request will not impact geology, soils, air quality, demography, biota,
and cultural and historic resources under normal and severe handling,
storage, use, and disposal. The NRC has determined that the benefits of
this exemption exceed the radiological risks and risks of non-
radiological impacts.
3.0 Alternatives to Proposed Action
3.1 Alternative 1: License Units Under General License Regulations
The first alternative would be to license the distribution of the
Entryscan units under the equivalent Agreement State regulation of 10
CFR 32.51 for Generally Licensed Items, which would allow GE to service
the units at customer sites and ship the units in parts.
3.2 Alternative 2: Dispose of Defective Units
A second alternative would be to dispose defective Entryscan units
as normal waste as allowed for products distributed under 10 CFR 32.26,
rather than repair the units for further use, and to ship the units in
one piece.
3.3 Alternative 3: No-Action Alternative
The No-Action Alternative would be the denial of the proposed
action. Under this alternative, GE would not be able to replace
defective detector heads at customer sites, and would not be able to
ship the units under their Exempt Distribution License. GE would
therefore need to license the units under General License regulations.
4.0 Environmental Impacts of Alternatives
4.1 Alternative 1: License Units Under General License Regulations
The environmental impacts for the first alternative would be the
same as for the proposed action. However, this alternative would
increase the administrative and regulatory burden on the licensee,
customers, and regulatory authorities. The additional burden would be
requiring more frequent reporting by the licensee, requiring the end-
users to appoint a person knowledgeable of pertinent regulations,
requiring the end-users to leak test the units, and requiring the
regulator to track the units.
4.2 Alternative 2: Dispose of Defective Units
The environmental impacts for the second alternative would be an
increased level of contamination in the normal waste stream at customer
sites, since the Entryscan units would be allowed to be disposed of as
regular waste as allowed with exempt household smoke detectors licensed
for distribution under 10 CFR 32.26.
4.3 Alternative 3: No-Action Alternative
The environmental impacts for the No-Action Alternative would be
the
[[Page 51852]]
same as for the first alternative and the proposed action. The burden,
however, on the licensee, end-users, and regulators would be greater
than that of the proposed action by requiring more frequent reporting
by the licensee, requiring the end-users to appoint a person
knowledgeable of pertinent regulations, requiring the end-users to leak
test the units, and requiring the regulator to track the units.
5.0 Agencies and Persons Contacted
GE has distribution facilities located in Wilmington, MA, Newark,
CA, and Lincolnton, NC. NRC contacted the radiation control programs of
the States of Massachusetts, California, and North Carolina. These
states had no objection to the proposed action in this EA.
NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not affect
listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, no further consultation
is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Likewise,
NRC staff have determined that the proposed action is not the type of
activity that has potential to cause effects on historic properties.
Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
6.0 Conclusion
The action that NRC is considering is to issue an amendment to
License No. 20-23904-01E and an exemption from 10 CFR 32.26 to allow GE
Field Service Engineers to service Entryscan explosives/narcotics walk-
through detection devices at customer sites, and to allow GE to ship
the Entryscan devices in parts for final assembly at customer sites.
The NRC staff considered the environmental consequences of approving
the license amendment and exemption, and has determined that the
approval will have no adverse effect on public health and safety or the
environment. Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed
action is the preferred alternative, the environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action do not warrant denial of the
license amendment and exemption request.
7.0 Finding of No Significant Impact
The Commission has prepared this EA related to GE's exemption
request. On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no
significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that
preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant
Impact is appropriate.
8.0 References
1. SSD Certificate No. NR-0399-D-101-E.
2. NRC License No. 20-23904-01E.
3. GE letters dated November 29, 2006 and May 13, 2007, with
enclosures thereto.
IV. Further Information
Questions regarding this action may be directed to Duncan White at
(301) 415-2598 or by e-mail at ADW@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 17th day of August, 2007.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Janet Schlueter,
Director, Division of Materials Safety and State Agreements, Office of
Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-17878 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
