Informational Notice Regarding Certain Substituted Specimens, 51887-51891 [07-4428]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: July 24, 2007.
Description: Application of Thomas
Cook Airlines UK Limited, (‘‘Thomas
Cook UK’’) requesting a foreign air
carrier permit so that Thomas Cook UK
will be able to exercise new rights made
available to European air carriers
pursuant to the Air Transport
Agreement between the United States
and the European Community and the
Member States of the European Union
(US–EC Agreement). Thomas Cook UK
also requests an amendment to its
existing exemption to the extent
necessary to enable it to provide the
services covered by this application
while the Department evaluates Thomas
Cook UK’s application for a foreign air
carrier permit.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27060.
Date Filed: July 5, 2007.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: July 25, 2007.
Description: Application of Zoom
Airlines Limited (‘‘Zoom’’), requesting
amendment no. 2 to its application for
a foreign air carrier permit and an
exemption to conduct: (i) Foreign
scheduled and charter air transportation
of persons, property and mail from any
point(s) behind any Member State(s) of
the European Community via any
point(s) in any Member State(s) and
intermediate points to any point(s) in
the United States and beyond; (ii)
foreign scheduled and charter air
transportation of persons, property and
mail between any point(s) in the United
States and any point(s) in any member
of the European Common Aviation
Area; (iii) foreign scheduled and charter
cargo air transportation between any
point(s) in the United States and any
other points(s); (iv) other charters
pursuant Part 212; and (v)
transportation authorized by any
additional route or other right(s) made
available to European Community
carriers in the future.
Docket Number: OST–2007–28705.
Date Filed: July 6, 2007.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: July 27, 2007.
Description: Application of Virgin
Blue International Airlines Pty Ltd
(‘‘VBIA’’), requesting a foreign air carrier
permit and an exemption in order to
engage in scheduled foreign air
transportation of persons, property and
mail between the United States and
Australia to the full extent authorized
by the Air Transport Agreement
between the United States of the
America and the Government of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Commonwealth of Australia (‘‘the USAustralia Agreement’’). VBIA also
requests authority to engage in charter
trips in foreign air transportation and
other charters.
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7–17848 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Informational Notice Regarding Certain
Substituted Specimens
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
Department of Transportation.
SUMMARY: The Office of Drug and
Alcohol Policy and Compliance
(ODAPC) is taking action to rectify what
may be a mischaracterization of some
test results as being substituted
specimens. In appropriate cases,
ODAPC will reconsider the employee’s
original refusal result, when reported
from September 1998 through May
2003, and based upon a ‘‘substitution’’
finding in a given numerical range.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Snider, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of the Secretary,
Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and
Compliance, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590; or
Telephone (202) 366–3784; or E-mail
mark.snider@dot.gov.
AGENCY:
In
September 1998, Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) issued
guidance (Program Document 035;
September 28, 1998), for laboratories to
determine when to report a urine
specimen to the Medical Review Officer
(MRO) as substituted. Under this
guidance, a substituted specimen must
have had a creatinine level of 5 mg/dL
or less and a specific gravity less than
or equal to 1.001 or greater than or equal
to 1.020.
On the same date—September 28,
1998—ODAPC issued a memorandum to
MROs as a companion piece to HHS’s
PD 035. In its memorandum, ODAPC
instructed MROs to consider laboratory
reported substituted results as refusals
to test. There were no provisions for
MRO review of substituted laboratory
results.
The Department of Transportation
amended part 40 (65 FR 79462),
effective January 18, 2001, to put into
practice, among other things,
procedures for MRO review of
substituted specimens. The amendment
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51887
held that employees could show MROs
that they had medical reasons for
producing the result and present
evidence that they could naturally
produce specimens meeting the HHS
criteria for substituted specimens.
MROs could cancel a ‘‘substituted’’
result in these circumstances.
In May 2003, in response to scientific
information that suggested that some
people could naturally produce urine
with creatinine in the 2 to 5 mg/dL
range, the Department of Transportation
issued an interim final rule (68 FR
31624; May 28, 2003) directing MROs
not to treat these results as substituted,
but as negative-dilute. Unlike part 40
procedures with other negative-dilute
results however, MROs were instructed
to direct the employer to have the
employee return to the collection site
for a directly observed collection with
no prior notice. The result of the
observed collection would be the result
of the record for the entire testing event.
HHS revised its Mandatory
Guidelines with an effective date of
November 1, 2004 (69 FR 19659; April
13, 2004). Among the revisions
contained in the HHS Guidelines was
the requirement that laboratories modify
substituted specimen criteria. Under the
revised HHS Guidelines, there were,
and are, no specimens with creatinine
levels greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL
being reported by laboratories as
substituted.
Substituted results with creatinine in
the 2 to 5 mg/dL range occurring
between September 1998 and May 2003
were, according to the valid regulations
in effect at that time, properly
interpreted as refusals to test. However,
in the interest of fairness the
Department of Transportation is
providing to individuals with such
results the opportunity to have their
drug test result reconsidered. If an
employee’s substituted drug test result
is reconsidered, employers will be
instructed not to report the substituted
result to other DOT regulated employers
requesting the employee’s drug and
alcohol testing history as required in 49
CFR part 40.25.
The Department of Transportation is
issuing this notice to set forth the
procedures for such reconsideration.
According to the notice, we intend to
grant reconsideration only to those
employees who present credible
medical documentation that
demonstrates their ability to naturally
produce urine specimens with
creatinine concentrations equal to or
greater than 2, but less than or equal to
5 mg/dL and a specific gravity less than
or equal to 1.001 or greater than or equal
to 1.020.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51888
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Employers who discover that an
employee was reported to have a refusal
to test as the result of a laboratory
finding of creatinine concentration
equal to or greater than 2, but less than
or equal to 5 mg/dL, prior to May 28,
2003, should inform the employee that
he or she may submit documentation to
ODAPC for reconsideration. To be
viewed by ODAPC as credible medical
documentation, the employee would
have to submit information from a
licensed physician or a MRO which
documents that the employee can
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
physiologically produce urine meeting
the creatinine and specific gravity
criteria. ODAPC will also accept an
MRO verified drug result from the
employee which resulted from a
Department of Transportation required
drug testing event that demonstrates the
employee’s ability to produce a
creatinine level equal to or greater than
2, but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL.
This verified result must have been
reported by the MRO to the employer
after May 28, 2003.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The notice also provides the address
that employees should send their
documentation. ODAPC will carefully
review every submission and will
respond in writing to each employee
who seeks to have his or her original
refusal to test result reviewed.
Issued this 5th day of September 2007, at
Washington, DC.
Jim L. Swart,
Acting Director, Office of Drug and Alcohol
Policy and Compliance.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51889
EN11SE07.007
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
EN11SE07.008
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
51890
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–C
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2007–28850]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Revision of an Approved
Information Collection: Driver
Qualification Files
Please send your comments by
October 11, 2007. OMB must receive
your comments by this date in order to
act quickly on the ICR.
DATES:
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
All comments should
reference Docket No. FMCSA–2007–
28850. You may submit comments to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 Seventeenth Street, NW.,
ADDRESSES:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
FMCSA announces its plan to submit
the Information Collection Request (ICR)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. This collection,
entitled ‘‘Driver Qualification Files,’’
accounts for the information that motor
carriers must obtain and maintain on
the qualifications of the commercial
motor vehicle (CMV) drivers they
employ. On May 23, 2007, FMCSA
published a Federal Register notice
allowing for a 60-day comment period
on the ICR. No comments were received.
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: DOT/
FMCSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Thomas Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver
and Carrier Operations Division.
Telephone: 202–366–4235; e-mail
MCPSD@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Driver Qualification Files.
OMB Control Number: 2126–0004.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Motor carriers; drivers.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 7
million.
Estimated Time per Response: An
average of 28 minutes.
Expiration Date: September 30, 2007.
Frequency of Response: The principal
obligations of these rules are imposed
on motor carriers when considering a
driver for employment, and on CMV
drivers, when applying for employment.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
EN11SE07.009
[FR Doc. 07–4428 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
51891
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51887-51891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Informational Notice Regarding Certain Substituted Specimens
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation.
SUMMARY: The Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance (ODAPC)
is taking action to rectify what may be a mischaracterization of some
test results as being substituted specimens. In appropriate cases,
ODAPC will reconsider the employee's original refusal result, when
reported from September 1998 through May 2003, and based upon a
``substitution'' finding in a given numerical range.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Snider, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of the Secretary, Office of Drug and Alcohol
Policy and Compliance, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590; or Telephone (202) 366-3784; or E-mail mark.snider@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In September 1998, Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) issued guidance (Program Document 035; September
28, 1998), for laboratories to determine when to report a urine
specimen to the Medical Review Officer (MRO) as substituted. Under this
guidance, a substituted specimen must have had a creatinine level of 5
mg/dL or less and a specific gravity less than or equal to 1.001 or
greater than or equal to 1.020.
On the same date--September 28, 1998--ODAPC issued a memorandum to
MROs as a companion piece to HHS's PD 035. In its memorandum, ODAPC
instructed MROs to consider laboratory reported substituted results as
refusals to test. There were no provisions for MRO review of
substituted laboratory results.
The Department of Transportation amended part 40 (65 FR 79462),
effective January 18, 2001, to put into practice, among other things,
procedures for MRO review of substituted specimens. The amendment held
that employees could show MROs that they had medical reasons for
producing the result and present evidence that they could naturally
produce specimens meeting the HHS criteria for substituted specimens.
MROs could cancel a ``substituted'' result in these circumstances.
In May 2003, in response to scientific information that suggested
that some people could naturally produce urine with creatinine in the 2
to 5 mg/dL range, the Department of Transportation issued an interim
final rule (68 FR 31624; May 28, 2003) directing MROs not to treat
these results as substituted, but as negative-dilute. Unlike part 40
procedures with other negative-dilute results however, MROs were
instructed to direct the employer to have the employee return to the
collection site for a directly observed collection with no prior
notice. The result of the observed collection would be the result of
the record for the entire testing event.
HHS revised its Mandatory Guidelines with an effective date of
November 1, 2004 (69 FR 19659; April 13, 2004). Among the revisions
contained in the HHS Guidelines was the requirement that laboratories
modify substituted specimen criteria. Under the revised HHS Guidelines,
there were, and are, no specimens with creatinine levels greater than
or equal to 2 mg/dL being reported by laboratories as substituted.
Substituted results with creatinine in the 2 to 5 mg/dL range
occurring between September 1998 and May 2003 were, according to the
valid regulations in effect at that time, properly interpreted as
refusals to test. However, in the interest of fairness the Department
of Transportation is providing to individuals with such results the
opportunity to have their drug test result reconsidered. If an
employee's substituted drug test result is reconsidered, employers will
be instructed not to report the substituted result to other DOT
regulated employers requesting the employee's drug and alcohol testing
history as required in 49 CFR part 40.25.
The Department of Transportation is issuing this notice to set
forth the procedures for such reconsideration. According to the notice,
we intend to grant reconsideration only to those employees who present
credible medical documentation that demonstrates their ability to
naturally produce urine specimens with creatinine concentrations equal
to or greater than 2, but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL and a specific
gravity less than or equal to 1.001 or greater than or equal to 1.020.
[[Page 51888]]
Employers who discover that an employee was reported to have a
refusal to test as the result of a laboratory finding of creatinine
concentration equal to or greater than 2, but less than or equal to 5
mg/dL, prior to May 28, 2003, should inform the employee that he or she
may submit documentation to ODAPC for reconsideration. To be viewed by
ODAPC as credible medical documentation, the employee would have to
submit information from a licensed physician or a MRO which documents
that the employee can physiologically produce urine meeting the
creatinine and specific gravity criteria. ODAPC will also accept an MRO
verified drug result from the employee which resulted from a Department
of Transportation required drug testing event that demonstrates the
employee's ability to produce a creatinine level equal to or greater
than 2, but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL. This verified result must
have been reported by the MRO to the employer after May 28, 2003.
The notice also provides the address that employees should send
their documentation. ODAPC will carefully review every submission and
will respond in writing to each employee who seeks to have his or her
original refusal to test result reviewed.
Issued this 5th day of September 2007, at Washington, DC.
Jim L. Swart,
Acting Director, Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance.
[[Page 51889]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11SE07.007
[[Page 51890]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11SE07.008
[[Page 51891]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11SE07.009
[FR Doc. 07-4428 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-C