Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records, 51466-51467 [E7-17687]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
51466
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Notices
of Decision. Second, if and when BLM
acquires certain property, described as
approximately 5,514 acres at Coast
Dairies in Santa Cruz County,
management decisions for this property
will be outlined in a separate Record of
Decision (ROD).
The Approved RMP expands the
existing 43,357 acre Panoche-Coalinga
Area of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC) to include an additional 12,772
acres, and designates two new ACECs
(21,980 acres) and one Research Natural
Area (RNA) for a total of 78,109 acres of
special designations, which is
approximately 3 percent of the planning
area. The new ACECs include all BLM
public lands at the former Fort Ord and
7,327 acres of BLM public lands
surrounding Joaquin Rocks. The
Monvero Dunes RNA (1,173 acres) is
contained within the Panoche-Coalinga
ACEC expansion.
The following types of resource use
limitations would generally apply to
these ACECs: (1) Motorized travel
would be limited to designated routes;
(2) limits on land disposal; and (3)
limits on new mineral development
(mineral leasing, locatable minerals and
wind energy) to protect unique cultural
values and special status plants and
animals. For detailed information, see
Chapter 3 and Appendix D of the ROD
for the Hollister RMP for the Southern
Diablo Mountain Range and Central
Coast of California.
The Governor of the State of
California in his letter dated September
15, 2006 stated, ‘‘Pursuant to 43 CFR
1603–2, and after consulting with
affected State and Local agencies, the
Governor’s Office of Planning and
Research (OPR) has not found any
inconsistencies with any state or local
plans, policies, or programs with
regards to this [Proposed] Resource
Management Plan.’’
The decisions identifying designated
routes of travel for motorized vehicles
are implementation decisions and are
appealable under 43 CFR Part 4. These
decisions are contained on Figures 17–
21 in Appendix A of the RMP. Any
party adversely affected by the decisions
identifying designated routes may
appeal within 30 days of publication of
this Notice of Availability. The appeal
should state the specific route(s), as
identified in Appendix A of the RMP,
on which the decision is being
appealed. The appeal must be filed with
the Hollister Field Manager at the above
listed address.
Please consult the appropriate
regulations (43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E)
for further appeal requirements. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:34 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
identifying information in your appeal,
you should be aware that your entire
appeal—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your appeal to
withhold your personal information
from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Dated: July 26, 2007.
Rick Cooper,
Hollister Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. E7–17718 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act
Pursuant to 28 CFR 507 notice is
hereby given that on August 16, 2007,
a proposed Consent Decree in the Case
United States v. Gwen Campbell Trust
1995 et al., Civil Action No. 07–05350
GHK (FFMx), was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Central District of California.
In this action, under Sections 106 and
107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and
9607, the United States sought
injunctive relief and recovery of
response costs to remedy conditions in
connection with the release or
threatened release of hazardous
substances into the environment at the
Waste Disposal, Inc. Superfund Site in
Santa Fe Springs, California (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Site’’ or ‘‘WDI Site.’’
The defendants in this action own a
portion of the WDI Site, and the purpose
of the settlement is to provide to the
United States the access and
institutional controls or environmental
restriction covenants which are required
to perform the remedial action at the
Site.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the proposed Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, U.S. Department of Justice,
P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–
7611, and should refer to United States
v. Gwen Campbell Trust 1995 et al., D.J.
Ref. 90–11–2–1000/4.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94107. During the public comment
period, the Consent Decree, may also be
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.
A copy of the proposed Consent
Decree may also be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611, or by
faxing Tonia Fleetwood at fax no. (202)
514–0097 (phone confirmation number
(202) 514–1547) or by e-mailing Tonia
Fleetwood at
tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov. In
requesting a copy of the Consent Decree
from the Consent Decree Library, please
enclose a check in the amount $69.50
(25 cents per page reproduction cost ×
278 pages) payable to the U.S. Treasury.
In requesting a copy of the Consent
Decree, exclusive of exhibits, please
enclose a check in the amount of $15.25
(25 cents per page reproduction cost ×
61 pages) payable to the U.S. Treasury.
Henry S. Friedman
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 07–4359 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[AAG/A Order No. 029–2007]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
U.S. Department of Justice.
Modification to Systems of
Records.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice serves to remove
a specific routine use from certain
Department of Justice (DOJ) Privacy Act
systems of records notices. On January
31, 2001, at 66 FR 8425–32, the
following routine use language was
added to all DOJ Privacy Act notices
published prior to that date, in
accordance with a DOJ regulation
published at 28 CFR 16.300–01.
[Disclosure ] ‘‘To a former employee
of the Department for purposes of:
Responding to an official inquiry by a
federal, state, or local government entity
or professional licensing authority, in
accordance with applicable Department
regulations; or facilitating
communications with a former
employee that may be necessary for
personnel-related or other official
purposes where the Department requires
information and/or consultation
assistance from the former employee
regarding a matter within that person’s
former area of responsibility.’’
This routine use is hereby deleted
from the following Privacy Act Systems
of Records Notices included in the
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Notices
publication of January 31, 2001, at 66
FR 8425–8432:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
BOP–014 ‘‘Employee Assistance
Program (EAP) Record System;’’
JMD–002 ‘‘Controlled Substances Act
Nonpublic Records;’’
JMD–016 ‘‘Employee Assistance
Program (EAP) Counseling and
Referral Records;’’
USM–015 ‘‘U.S. Marshals Service
(USMS) Employee Assistance
Program (EAP) Records.’’
[Exemption Application Nos. D–11272; D–
11340; and D–11344]
In addition, the language of this routine
use is removed from the notice
published on March 20, 2001, at 66 FR
15755, entitled USA–020 ‘‘Employee
Assistance Program (EAP) Counseling
and Referral Records.’’ The language is
routine use ‘‘f’’ in that notice. The
change in the text of USA–020 is shown
below.
These modifications
will be effective September 7, 2007.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Joo
Chung, Counsel, Privacy and Civil
Liberties Office, Office of the Deputy
Attorney General, 202–514–4921.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
SYSTEM NAME:
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Counseling and Referral Records,
Justice/USA–020.
*
*
*
*
*
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
*
*
*
*
*
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
[Remove Routine Use ‘‘f.’’]
*
*
*
*
*
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemptions.
AGENCY:
This document contains
exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
and/or the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal
Register of the pendency before the
Department of a proposal to grant such
exemption. The notice set forth a
summary of facts and representations
contained in the application for
exemption and referred interested
persons to the application for a
complete statement of the facts and
representations. The application has
been available for public inspection at
the Department in Washington, DC. The
notice also invited interested persons to
submit comments on the requested
exemption to the Department. In
addition the notice stated that any
interested person might submit a
written request that a public hearing be
held (where appropriate). The applicant
has represented that it has complied
with the requirements of the notification
to interested persons. No requests for a
hearing were received by the
Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described
in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption
was issued and the exemption is being
granted solely by the Department
because, effective December 31, 1978,
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No.
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996),
transferred the authority of the Secretary
of the Treasury to issue exemptions of
the type proposed to the Secretary of
Labor.
SUMMARY:
CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes
the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively
feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests
of the plan and its participants and
beneficiaries; and
(c) The exemption is protective of the
rights of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan.
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC), Located
in San Francisco, California
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2007–14;
Exemption Application No. D–11272]
Exemption
Section I—Transactions
The restrictions of section 406 of the
Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (F) of the Code, shall not apply
to the purchase of certain securities (the
Securities), as defined, below in Section
III(h), by an asset management affiliate
of WFC, as ‘‘affiliate’’ is defined, below,
in Section III(c), from any person other
than such asset management affiliate of
WFC or any affiliate thereof, during the
existence of an underwriting or selling
syndicate with respect to such
Securities, where a broker-dealer
affiliated with WFC (the Affiliated
Broker-Dealer), as defined, below, in
Section III(b), is a manager or member
of such syndicate and the asset
management affiliate of WFC purchases
such Securities, as a fiduciary:
(a) On behalf of an employee benefit
plan or employee benefit plans (Client
Plan(s)), as defined, below, in Section
III(e); or
(b) on behalf of Client Plans, and/or
In-House Plans, as defined, below, in
Section III(l), which are invested in a
pooled fund or in pooled funds (Pooled
Fund(s)), as defined, below, in Section
III(f); provided that the conditions as set
forth, below, in Section II, are satisfied
(An affiliated underwriter transaction
(AUT)).1
Statutory Findings
BILLING CODE 4410–FB–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:34 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Section II—Conditions
The exemption is conditioned upon
adherence to the material facts and
representations described herein and
upon satisfaction of the following
requirements:
(a)(1) The Securities to be purchased
are either—
(i) Part of an issue registered under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the 1933 Act)
In accordance with section 408(a) of
the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and the procedures set forth in 29
[FR Doc. E7–17687 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Grant of Individual Exemptions
Involving; D–11272 Wells Fargo &
Company (WFC), (PTE 2007–14); D–
11340, Hawaii Emergency Physicians
Associated, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
(the Plan), (PTE 2007–15); D–11344,
Victor P. Olson Profit Sharing Plan (the
Plan), (PTE 2007–16)
51467
1 For purposes of this exemption an In-House
Plan may engage in AUT’s only through investment
in a Pooled Fund.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 173 (Friday, September 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51466-51467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17687]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[AAG/A Order No. 029-2007]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice.
ACTION: Modification to Systems of Records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice serves to remove a specific routine use from
certain Department of Justice (DOJ) Privacy Act systems of records
notices. On January 31, 2001, at 66 FR 8425-32, the following routine
use language was added to all DOJ Privacy Act notices published prior
to that date, in accordance with a DOJ regulation published at 28 CFR
16.300-01.
[Disclosure ] ``To a former employee of the Department for purposes
of: Responding to an official inquiry by a federal, state, or local
government entity or professional licensing authority, in accordance
with applicable Department regulations; or facilitating communications
with a former employee that may be necessary for personnel-related or
other official purposes where the Department requires information and/
or consultation assistance from the former employee regarding a matter
within that person's former area of responsibility.''
This routine use is hereby deleted from the following Privacy Act
Systems of Records Notices included in the
[[Page 51467]]
publication of January 31, 2001, at 66 FR 8425-8432:
BOP-014 ``Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Record System;''
JMD-002 ``Controlled Substances Act Nonpublic Records;''
JMD-016 ``Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Counseling and Referral
Records;''
USM-015 ``U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) Employee Assistance Program
(EAP) Records.''
In addition, the language of this routine use is removed from the
notice published on March 20, 2001, at 66 FR 15755, entitled USA-020
``Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Counseling and Referral Records.''
The language is routine use ``f'' in that notice. The change in the
text of USA-020 is shown below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: These modifications will be effective September 7,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joo Chung, Counsel, Privacy and Civil
Liberties Office, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, 202-514-4921.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
System Name:
Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Counseling and Referral Records,
Justice/USA-020.
* * * * *
Routine Uses of Records Maintained in The System, Including Categories
of Users and the Purposes of Such Uses:
* * * * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
[Remove Routine Use ``f.'']
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-17687 Filed 9-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FB-P
