Request for Public Comment and Office of Management and Budget Approval for a New Information Collection, 51489-51490 [07-4362]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Notices
from the port where each RLNGC is
expected to receive LNG cargo at sea
from conventional LNG carriers. STS1
Santa Rosa (Latitude 33°39′ N,
Longitude 119°56′30″ W), STS2 Inshore
San Clemente (Latitude 33°05′ N,
Longitude 118°10′ W) and STS3
Skaugen Offshore (Latitude 32°15′ N,
Longitude 120°0′ W). Only one transfer
location would be used at a time. The
RLNGCs, with storage capacity of
224,000 m3 of LNG would be capable of
receiving conventional LNG carriers
(LNGCs) with storage capacities of up to
216,000 m3 of LNG.
As proposed, LNG would be delivered
from overseas by LNGCs and transferred
to a Woodside RLNGC at one of the
three STS locations. The RLNGC would
then be sailed and moored to a SPM,
where the LNG would be regasified into
natural gas and delivered to shore via
two new parallel 24-inch pipelines. The
RLNGC would then return to a STS
location.
The RLNGCs would use a turret
system with the SPMs to allow the
RLNGC to weathervane (rotate) around
the buoy. Onboard utilities and systems
associated with RLNCG operations
would include electric power generation
and distribution, instrumentation and
controls, and fire and safety systems.
The RLNGC would include all marine
systems, communications, navigation
aids and equipment necessary to safely
conduct RLNGC carrier operations,
receive and vaporize product.
The RLNGCs would use a forced draft
ambient air LNG vaporization system
using a combination of intermediate
fluid and direct ambient air with heat
provided by ambient air called the
Woodside Hybrid Air Vaporization
(WHAV) concept.
Natural gas would be delivered
onshore via two 24-inch parallel
pipelines, approximately 35 miles in
length. These pipelines would come
onshore on the north end of LAX at
Dockweiler Beach. It is proposed that
horizontal directional drilling be used to
install the pipelines beneath land and
seabed in offshore City waters and
underneath the beach and adjacent
dunes from a point about 1000 feet
inland from the high tide mark just east
of Vista del Mar on LAX property.
Woodside would lease/franchise from
the City a 300 foot wide corridor on
submerged City lands out to the 3
nautical mile (3.45 mile) offshore limit
of the City boundary. On-shore
pipelines would be constructed on Cityowned land from the high tide line to
Pershing Drive, passing under the beach
and the El Segundo Dunes, and
underground through City streets. The
route would include Westchester
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:34 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Parkway/Arbor Vitae Street, then south
on Bellanca Avenue to the receiving and
custody transfer station (RCTS) and
adjacent Inert Gas Injection Facility
(IGIF) located at 5651 96th Street, Los
Angeles, about 4 miles inland. A single
36-inch pipeline would run
approximately a quarter of a mile back
north on Bellanca Avenue to Arbor
Vitae, then to the existing Southern
California Gas natural gas pipeline
infrastructure with Tie-in #1 at the
intersection of Aviation Boulevard and
Arbor Vitae Street. A second stage, with
development depending on demand,
may include additional pipelines and
tie-ins that are an approximate 11-mile
single 24-inch line from Tie-In #1 along
Arbor Vitae, Prairie, Manchester,
Firestone, and California to Tie-In #3 at
Santa Ana Street and Otis Avenue in
Huntington Park and an approximate 1
mile single 24-inch line from
Manchester Street to Central Ave to TieIn #2 at the intersection of S. Central
Avenue and E. Century Boulevard.
These pipeline routes include running
through the cities of Los Angeles,
Inglewood, South Gate and Huntington
Park. At full development, Southern
California Gas would own and operate
the system downstream of the RCTS.
The application also includes an
alternative DWP location in the Gulf of
Santa Catalina approximately 30 miles
from Huntington Beach at latitude
117°56′28.53″ west, longitude
33°13′24.88″ north with a 30 mile
pipeline running north to a shore
crossing at the AES power plant in
Huntington Beach. It would cross
through the cities of Huntington Beach,
Fountain Valley, Westminster, Garden
Grove, Santa Anna, and Orange. The
pipeline would be trenched through city
streets traveling north along Newland
Street towards Bolsa Avenue; turn east
at Bolsa Ave. (1st Street); turn north at
the OCTA Metrolink Right of Way and
join Lincoln Ave; east on Fairhaven
Ave.; north at Cambridge Street; and
finally west on Palm Ave. where the
pipeline would connect to the SCG tiein in Orange.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.66)
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: August 31, 2007.
Daron T. Threet,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17649 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51489
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2003–15864]
Request for Public Comment and
Office of Management and Budget
Approval for a New Information
Collection
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), this notice announces that
PHMSA has forwarded an Information
Collection Request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for a
new information collection. This
information collection is a survey of
hazardous liquid operators to obtain
information on unregulated low-stress
hazardous liquid pipeline
characteristics. The purpose of this
notice is to invite the public to submit
comments on the request to OMB.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
October 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments directly to
the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Desk Officer for the
Department of Transportation, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lane Miller at (405) 954–4969, or by email at Lane.Miller@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Pipeline Inspection, Protection,
Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006
(PIPES Act) enacted into law on
December 29, 2006, reauthorizes
PHMSA-administered pipeline safety
programs for fiscal years 2007 through
2010. Section 4 of the PIPES Act
requires that PHMSA issue regulations
by December 31, 2007, subjecting all
low-stress hazardous liquid pipelines to
the same standards and regulations as
other hazardous liquid pipelines.
PHMSA currently exempts low stress
pipelines from regulations except for
those in populated areas and crossing
navigable waterways. On May 18, 2007,
PHMSA published a supplementary
notice of proposed rulemaking
proposing to apply all Federal
Hazardous liquid pipeline safety
regulations to a specific set of these
remaining low rural low-stress lines (72
FR 28008).
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
51490
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 173 / Friday, September 7, 2007 / Notices
Low-stress pipelines are pipelines
operating at 20 percent or less of the
specified minimum yield strength of the
line pipe. PHMSA does not have data on
the total extent of currently unregulated
hazardous liquid low-stress pipelines in
the United States. To address this gap in
the data and to obtain a more accurate
understanding of the unregulated
hazardous liquid low-stress pipelines,
PHMSA is requesting OMB approval to
conduct a one-time information
collection survey. To the extent
possible, all operators of hazardous
liquid pipelines will be surveyed about
low stress mileage (including interplant
pipeline mileage), diameter, pipeline
material, products transported, and
location.
In order to reach as many operators as
possible, the survey will be delivered
electronically to each of the companies
currently operating regulated hazardous
liquid pipelines. PHMSA will also
attempt to reach companies that own
and/or operate currently unregulated
pipelines exclusively by working with
industry associations to announce and
distribute the survey via e-mail
newsletters to members. Respondents
will be able to print an electronic
version of the survey and mail a hard
copy, or complete the survey on-line
and e-mail it. Participation in the survey
is optional.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, PHMSA is required to obtain
OMB approval for information
collections. The term ‘‘information
collection’’ includes all work related to
preparing and disseminating
information related to this proposed
information collection including:
Completing paperwork, gathering
information, and conducting telephone
calls. PHMSA published a notice
providing a 60-day period for comments
on the proposed information collection
in the Federal Register on June 14, 2007
(72 FR 32941), and received no
comments. PHMSA is now providing an
additional 30-day comment period and
inviting comments on whether the
proposed information collection is
necessary for DOT’s proper
performance. The comments may
include (1) whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
DOT’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collection; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Type of Information Collection
Request: New Collection.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:34 Sep 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Respondents: 158.
Frequency: This is a one-time survey.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 16 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,528 hours.
Dated: August 31, 2007.
Florence L. Hamn,
Director of Regulations.
[FR Doc. 07–4362 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35068]
Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a
Canadian Pacific Railway—Acquisition
and Operation Exemption—BNSF
Railway Company
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of exemption.
The Board grants an
exemption, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, from
the prior approval requirements of 49
U.S.C. 11323–25 for Soo Line Railroad
Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific
Railway’s (CPR), a Class I rail carrier,
acquisition and operation of BNSF
Railway Company’s (BNSF), a Class I
rail carrier, property interests in 35.26
miles of rail lines that are jointly owned
by CPR and BNSF and a contiguous
9.96-mile rail line that is solely owned
by BNSF,1 subject to labor protective
conditions.
DATES: The exemption will be effective
on September 7, 2007. Petitions to
reopen must be filed by September 27,
2007.
ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of
all pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35068, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of all
pleadings must be served on petitioners’
representatives: Karl Morell, Counsel for
BNSF Railway Company, Ball Janik
LLP, 1455 F Street, NW., Suite 225,
Washington, DC 20005; Richard E.
Weicher, BNSF Railway Company, 2500
Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76131–
2828; and W. Karl Hansen, Leonard,
SUMMARY:
1 In a related transaction, Dakota, Missouri Valley
& Western Railroad, Inc. (DMVW), filed a verified
notice of exemption to lease and operate, pursuant
to an agreement with CPR, approximately 45 miles
of rail line that CPR plans to acquire from BNSF
and then lease to DMVW. See Dakota, Missouri
Valley & Western Railroad, Inc.—Acquisition and
Operation Exemption—Soo Line Railway Company
d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway, STB Finance
Docket No. 35055 (STB served Aug. 10, 2007).
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Street and Deinard Professional
Association, Counsel for Soo Line
Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian
Pacific Railway, 150 South Fifth Street,
Suite 2300, Minneapolis, MN 55402.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Ziembicki, (202) 245–0386.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additional information is contained in
the Board’s decision. To purchase a
copy of the full decision, write to, email, or call: ASAP Document
Solutions, 9332 Annapolis Rd., Suite
103, Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail:
asapdc@verizon.net; telephone: (202)
306–4004. [Assistance for the hearing
impaired is available through FIRS at 1–
800–877–8339.]
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: August 29, 2007.
By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice
Chairman Buttrey, and Commissioner
Mulvey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–17578 Filed 9–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Unblocking of Specially Designated
Narcotics Traffickers Pursuant to
Executive Order 12978
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control
(‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the names of
two individuals whose property and
interests in property have been
unblocked pursuant to Executive Order
12978 of October 21, 1995, Blocking
Assets and Prohibiting Transactions
With Significant Narcotics Traffickers.
DATES: The unblocking and removal
from the list of Specially Designated
Narcotics Traffickers of the individuals
identified in this notice whose property
and interests in property were blocked
pursuant to Executive Order 12978.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Houghton, Assistant Director,
Designation Investigations, Office of
Foreign Assets Control, Department of
the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220,
tel.: 202/622–2420.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 173 (Friday, September 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51489-51490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4362]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2003-15864]
Request for Public Comment and Office of Management and Budget
Approval for a New Information Collection
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
this notice announces that PHMSA has forwarded an Information
Collection Request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a
new information collection. This information collection is a survey of
hazardous liquid operators to obtain information on unregulated low-
stress hazardous liquid pipeline characteristics. The purpose of this
notice is to invite the public to submit comments on the request to
OMB.
DATES: Submit comments on or before October 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments directly to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Desk
Officer for the Department of Transportation, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lane Miller at (405) 954-4969, or by
e-mail at Lane.Miller@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pipeline Inspection, Protection,
Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006 (PIPES Act) enacted into law on
December 29, 2006, reauthorizes PHMSA-administered pipeline safety
programs for fiscal years 2007 through 2010. Section 4 of the PIPES Act
requires that PHMSA issue regulations by December 31, 2007, subjecting
all low-stress hazardous liquid pipelines to the same standards and
regulations as other hazardous liquid pipelines. PHMSA currently
exempts low stress pipelines from regulations except for those in
populated areas and crossing navigable waterways. On May 18, 2007,
PHMSA published a supplementary notice of proposed rulemaking proposing
to apply all Federal Hazardous liquid pipeline safety regulations to a
specific set of these remaining low rural low-stress lines (72 FR
28008).
[[Page 51490]]
Low-stress pipelines are pipelines operating at 20 percent or less
of the specified minimum yield strength of the line pipe. PHMSA does
not have data on the total extent of currently unregulated hazardous
liquid low-stress pipelines in the United States. To address this gap
in the data and to obtain a more accurate understanding of the
unregulated hazardous liquid low-stress pipelines, PHMSA is requesting
OMB approval to conduct a one-time information collection survey. To
the extent possible, all operators of hazardous liquid pipelines will
be surveyed about low stress mileage (including interplant pipeline
mileage), diameter, pipeline material, products transported, and
location.
In order to reach as many operators as possible, the survey will be
delivered electronically to each of the companies currently operating
regulated hazardous liquid pipelines. PHMSA will also attempt to reach
companies that own and/or operate currently unregulated pipelines
exclusively by working with industry associations to announce and
distribute the survey via e-mail newsletters to members. Respondents
will be able to print an electronic version of the survey and mail a
hard copy, or complete the survey on-line and e-mail it. Participation
in the survey is optional.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, PHMSA is required
to obtain OMB approval for information collections. The term
``information collection'' includes all work related to preparing and
disseminating information related to this proposed information
collection including: Completing paperwork, gathering information, and
conducting telephone calls. PHMSA published a notice providing a 60-day
period for comments on the proposed information collection in the
Federal Register on June 14, 2007 (72 FR 32941), and received no
comments. PHMSA is now providing an additional 30-day comment period
and inviting comments on whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for DOT's proper performance. The comments may include (1)
whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy
of DOT's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Type of Information Collection Request: New Collection.
Respondents: 158.
Frequency: This is a one-time survey.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: 16 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,528 hours.
Dated: August 31, 2007.
Florence L. Hamn,
Director of Regulations.
[FR Doc. 07-4362 Filed 9-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M