Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT, 51179-51180 [E7-17567]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
28. Amend § 416.1404 by revising
paragraph (a), removing paragraph (b)
and redesignating paragraph (c) as
paragraph (b).
The revision reads as follows:
I
§ 416.1404 Notice of the initial
determination.
(a) We will mail a written notice of
our initial determination to you at your
last known address. The written notice
will explain in simple and clear
language what we have determined and
the reasons for and the effect of our
determination. If our determination
involves a determination of disability
that is in whole or in part unfavorable
to you, our written notice also will
contain in understandable language a
statement of the case setting forth the
evidence on which our determination is
based. The notice also will inform you
of your right to reconsideration. We will
not mail a notice if the beneficiary’s
entitlement to benefits has ended
because of his or her death.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–17533 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–07–019]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed
the drawbridge operation regulations
that govern the operation of the
Washington Street S136 Bridge at mile
0.0, across the Norwalk River, Norwalk,
Connecticut. This final rule allows the
bridge to remain in the closed position
to facilitate the annual Norwalk River
Fun Run held on the first Saturday in
December, with a rain date for the next
day in the event of inclement weather.
This final rule is necessary for the safety
of the race participants and to facilitate
the running of the annual Fun Run
Race.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
DATES:
This rule is effective October 9,
2007.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
docket (CGD01–07–019) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District, (212) 668–7195.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
51179
Small Entities
On April 3, 2007, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations’’; Norwalk River,
Connecticut, in the Federal Register (72
FR 15852). We received no comments in
response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking. No public hearing was
requested and none was held.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the bridge closure is of short
duration and during a time period the
bridge seldom receives a request to
open.
Background and Purpose
Assistance for Small Entities
The Washington Street S136 Bridge
has a vertical clearance of 9 feet at mean
high water, and 16 feet at mean low
water in the closed position. The
existing drawbridge operation
regulations are listed at 33 CFR
117.217(a).
The bridge owner, the Connecticut
Department of Transportation, requested
a change to the regulations to help
facilitate the running of the annual
Norwalk River Fun Run Event which is
run on the first Saturday in December.
Under this final rule the Washington
Street S136 Bridge would remain in the
closed position from 10 a.m. through 12
p.m. on the first Saturday in December
with a rain date for the next day, the
first Sunday after the first Saturday in
December in the event of inclement
weather.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
No small entities requested Coast
Guard assistance and none was given.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Regulatory Information
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no
changes have been made to this final
rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3), of
that Order. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that Order.
This conclusion is based on the fact
the bridge closure is of short duration
and during a time period the bridge
seldom receives a request to open.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
51180
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation considering that it
relates to the promulgation of operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Section 117.217 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
I
§ 117.217
Norwalk River.
(a) The draw of the Washington Street
S136 Bridge, mile 0.0, at Norwalk, shall
operate as follows:
(1) The draw shall open on signal;
except that, from 7 a.m. to 8:45 a.m.,
11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and 4 p.m. to
6 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays, the draw need not be opened
for the passage of vessels that draw less
than 14 feet of water.
(2) The draw need not open for the
passage of vessel traffic, from 10 a.m. to
12 p.m., on the first Saturday in
December, to facilitate the running of
the annual Norwalk River Fun Run.
Should inclement weather force the
postponement of the race the above
bridge closure shall be implemented the
next day, the first Sunday after the first
Saturday in December, from 10 a.m. to
12 p.m.
(3) The bridge opening signal is three
short blasts. Vessels drawing 14 feet of
water or more shall add one prolonged
blast after the three short blasts.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 20, 2007.
Timothy S. Sullivan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–17567 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0572; FRL–8146–7]
Residues of Quaternary Ammonium
Compounds di-n-Alkyl (C8-10) dimethyl
Ammonium chloride, Exemption from
the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation amends 40
CFR 180.940(a), the exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds,
di-n-Alkyl (C8-10) dimethyl ammonium
chloride, average molecular weight (in
amu) 332 to 361 on food contact
surfaces when applied/used in public
eating places, dairy processing
equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils by increasing
the allowable use solution
concentrations of quaternary
compounds. Lonza Inc. submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 172 (Thursday, September 6, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51179-51180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17567]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01-07-019]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has changed the drawbridge operation
regulations that govern the operation of the Washington Street S136
Bridge at mile 0.0, across the Norwalk River, Norwalk, Connecticut.
This final rule allows the bridge to remain in the closed position to
facilitate the annual Norwalk River Fun Run held on the first Saturday
in December, with a rain date for the next day in the event of
inclement weather. This final rule is necessary for the safety of the
race participants and to facilitate the running of the annual Fun Run
Race.
DATES: This rule is effective October 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-07-019) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7195.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 3, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations''; Norwalk River,
Connecticut, in the Federal Register (72 FR 15852). We received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Washington Street S136 Bridge has a vertical clearance of 9
feet at mean high water, and 16 feet at mean low water in the closed
position. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at
33 CFR 117.217(a).
The bridge owner, the Connecticut Department of Transportation,
requested a change to the regulations to help facilitate the running of
the annual Norwalk River Fun Run Event which is run on the first
Saturday in December.
Under this final rule the Washington Street S136 Bridge would
remain in the closed position from 10 a.m. through 12 p.m. on the first
Saturday in December with a rain date for the next day, the first
Sunday after the first Saturday in December in the event of inclement
weather.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this
final rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This conclusion is based on the fact the bridge closure is of short
duration and during a time period the bridge seldom receives a request
to open.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge closure is of
short duration and during a time period the bridge seldom receives a
request to open.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have
[[Page 51180]]
determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation considering that it relates to the
promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Section 117.217 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 117.217 Norwalk River.
(a) The draw of the Washington Street S136 Bridge, mile 0.0, at
Norwalk, shall operate as follows:
(1) The draw shall open on signal; except that, from 7 a.m. to 8:45
a.m., 11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays, the draw need not be opened for the passage of
vessels that draw less than 14 feet of water.
(2) The draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic, from
10 a.m. to 12 p.m., on the first Saturday in December, to facilitate
the running of the annual Norwalk River Fun Run. Should inclement
weather force the postponement of the race the above bridge closure
shall be implemented the next day, the first Sunday after the first
Saturday in December, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
(3) The bridge opening signal is three short blasts. Vessels
drawing 14 feet of water or more shall add one prolonged blast after
the three short blasts.
* * * * *
Dated: August 20, 2007.
Timothy S. Sullivan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-17567 Filed 9-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P