Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut, 51204-51208 [E7-17535]
Download as PDF
51204
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an
amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations, part 71 to establish Class D,
E2, and E4 airspace and revise Class E5
airspace at Easton, MD. Class D and E2
Airspace Designations for Airspace
Areas extending upward from the
surface of the Earth, Class E4 Airspace
Areas Designated as an Extension to a
Class D Surface Area and Class E5
Airspace Areas extending upward from
700 feet ore more above the surface of
the Earth are published in Paragraphs
5000, 6002, 6004 and 6005 respectively
of FAA Order 7400.9P, dated September
1, 2006, and effective September 15,
2006, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1 The Class D,
E2, E4 and E5 airspace designations
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9P, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated September 1, 2006, and effective
September 15, 2006, is amended as
follows:
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA MD D Easton, MD [NEW]
Easton Airport/Newnam Field, MD
(Lat. 38°48′15″ N., long. 76°04′08″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 2,600 feet MSL
within a 4-mile radius of the Easton Airport/
Newnam Field. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific days and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective days and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace
Designated as Surface Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA MD E2 Easton, MD [NEW]
Easton Airport/Newman Field, MD
(Lat. 38°48′15″ N., long. 76°04′08″ W.)
Easton NDB
(Lat. 38°48′17″ N., long. 76°04′10″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 2,600 feet MSL
within a 4-mile radius of the Easton Airport/
Newman Field and that airspace within 2.7
miles each side of the 038° bearing from the
Easton NDB extending from the 4-mile radius
of the Easton Airport/Newman Field to 7.4
miles northeast of the NDB. This Class E
airspace area is effective during the specific
days and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective days and
times will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 604 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as an Extension to a Class D
Surface Area.
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
AEA MD E4 Easton, MD [NEW]
Easton Airport/Newman Field, MD
(Lat. 38°48′15″ N., long. 76°04′08″ W.)
Easton NDB
(Lat. 38°48′17″ N., long. 76°04′10″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within 2.7 miles each side of the 038°
bearing from the Easton NDB extending from
the 4-mile radius of the Easton Airport/
Newman Field to 7.4 miles northeast of the
NDB.
*
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:24 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA MD E5 Easton, MD [REVISED]
Easton Airport/Newman Field, MD
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(Lat. 38°48′15″ N., long. 76°04′08″ W.)
Easton NDB
(Lat. 38°48′17″ N., long. 76°04′10″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile
radius of the Easton Airport/Newman Field
and within 2.7 miles each side of the 038°
bearing from the Easton NDB extending from
the 6.7-mile radius to 7.4 miles northeast of
the NDB.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August
8, 2007.
Kathy Kutch,
Acting Manager, System Support Group
Eastern Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07–4330 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 49
[EPA–R01–OAR–2005–TR–0001; A–1–FRL–
8463–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of
Connecticut
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
approve a Tribal Implementation Plan
submitted by the Mohegan Tribe of
Indians of Connecticut. The TIP
establishes an enforceable cap on
nitrogen oxide emissions from
stationary sources owned by the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority and
located within the external boundaries
of the Mohegan Reservation. This action
is intended to help attain the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for ground-level ozone. This
action is being taken in accordance with
the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2005–TR–0001 by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918–0653.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2005–TR–
0001’’, Dan Brown, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100 (mail code CAP), Boston, MA
02114–2023.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to: Dan Brown,
E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM
06SEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Manager, Air Permits, Toxics and
Indoor Air Unit, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
11th floor, (CAP), Boston, MA 02114–
2023 Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2005–
TR–0001. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
through
https://www.regulations.gov, or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:24 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston,
MA. EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding legal holidays.
In addition to the publicly available
docket materials available for inspection
electronically in the Federal Docket
Management System at https://
www.regulations.gov, and the hard copy
available at the Regional Office, which
are identified in the ADDRESSES section
of this Federal Register, copies of the
Tribe’s submittal and EPA’s technical
support document are also available for
public inspection during normal
business hours, by appointment at the
Mohegan Tribe, Mohegan
Environmental Protection Department,
49 Sandy Desert Road, Uncasville, CT
06382, telephone number (860) 862–
6112.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida
E. McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics and
Indoor Air Unit, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
11th floor, (CAP), Boston, MA 02114–
2023, telephone number (617) 918–
1653, fax number (617) 918–0653, email mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. Organization of this document.
The following outline is provided to aid
in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background to This Rulemaking
II. CAA Requirements and the Role of the
Tribes
1. How did the 1990 CAA Amendments
include the tribes?
2. What criteria must a tribe demonstrate
to be treated in the same manner as a
state under the CAA?
3. What is an implementation plan for
criteria air pollutants and what must it
contain?
III. Analysis of the Mohegan TIP
1. Are the Mohegans eligible to run their
CAA air program?
2. Does the Mohegan TIP meet all CAA
requirements?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background to This Rulemaking
On May 4, 2005, the Mohegan Tribe
of Indians of Connecticut (the Tribe)
submitted a Tribal Implementation Plan
(Mohegan TIP) for approval by the EPA
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The
Mohegan TIP consists of a tribal
ordinance, entitled ‘‘Area Wide NOX
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51205
Emissions Limitation Regulation,’’ that
establishes a limit on nitrogen oxide
(NOX) emissions from stationary sources
owned by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming
Authority and located within the
external boundaries of the Mohegan
Reservation. On August 22, 2007, the
Tribe submitted an amendment to the
Mohegan TIP.
II. CAA Requirements and the Role of
the Tribes
1. How did the 1990 CAA Amendments
include the tribes?
Under the 1990 Amendments to the
Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA may
approve eligible tribes to administer
certain provisions of the CAA. Pursuant
to Section 301(d)(2) of the CAA, EPA
promulgated the Tribal Authority Rule
(TAR) on February 12, 1998 (63 FR
7254). The TAR specifies the CAA
provisions for which it is appropriate to
treat tribes in the same manner as states,
the eligibility criteria the tribes must
meet if they choose to seek such
treatment, and the procedure by which
EPA reviews a tribe’s request for an
eligibility determination.
As a general matter, EPA determined
in the TAR that it is not appropriate to
treat tribes in the same manner as states
for purposes of specific plan submittal
and implementation deadlines for
NAAQS-related requirements. 40 CFR
49.4. Thus, tribes are generally not
subject to CAA provisions which
specify a deadline by which something
must be accomplished. So, for example,
provisions mandating the submission of
state implementation plans do not apply
to the tribes. Furthermore, under the
TAR (40 CFR 49.7(c)), a tribe may
choose to implement reasonably
severable portions of the various CAA
programs, as long as it can demonstrate
that its proposed air program is not
integrally related to program elements
that are not included in the plan
submittal and is consistent with
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. So, for example, a tribe
may choose to submit a TIP that uses a
limited set of methods to control just
one or two air pollutants. This modular
approach is intended to give tribes the
flexibility to address their most pressing
air resource issues and acknowledges
that tribes often have limited resources
with which to address their
environmental concerns. Consistent
with the exceptions listed in 40 CFR
49.4, once submitted, a tribe’s proposed
air program will be evaluated in
accordance with applicable statutory
and regulatory criteria in a manner
similar to the way EPA would review a
similar state submittal. 40 CFR 49.8(h).
E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM
06SEP1
51206
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
EPA expects tribes to fully implement
and enforce their approved programs
and, as with states, EPA retains its
discretionary authority to impose
sanctions for failure to implement an air
program.
Where the provisions of the act or
implementing regulations governing the
program for which the tribe seeks
approval require criminal enforcement
authority, the tribe may enter into a
memorandum of agreement with the
appropriate EPA Region to provide for
criminal enforcement by EPA. 40 CFR
49.7(a)(6), 49.8.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
2. What criteria must a tribe
demonstrate to be treated in the same
manner as a state under the CAA?
Under Section 301(d) of the Clean Air
Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601, and the TAR (at 40
CFR 49.6), EPA may treat a tribe in the
same manner as a state for purposes of
administering certain CAA programs or
grants if the tribe demonstrates that (1)
it is federally recognized; (2) it has a
governing body carrying out substantial
governmental duties and powers; (3) the
functions to be exercised by the tribe
pertain to the management and
protection of air resources within the
tribe’s reservation or within nonreservation areas under the tribe’s
jurisdiction; and (4) it can reasonably be
expected to be capable of carrying out
the functions for which it seeks
approval.
3. What is an implementation plan for
criteria air pollutants and what must it
contain?
Implementation plans are a set of
programs and regulations submitted by
states and, if they so choose, by tribes,
that outline a definite plan by which the
state or tribe intends to help attain or
maintain NAAQS. NAAQS have been
established for the following six
pollutants: Ozone; carbon monoxide;
particulate matter; sulfur dioxide; lead;
and nitrogen dioxide. The EPA calls
these pollutants ‘‘criteria pollutants’’
because the original standards were
based on information in air quality
criteria documents developed for
pollutants that ‘‘endanger the public
health or welfare’’. Once approved by
EPA, implementation plans become
enforceable as a matter of federal law.
Implementation plans are governed by
Section 110 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410.
Under Sections 110(o) and 301(d) of the
CAA and the TAR (40 CFR 49.9(h)), any
TIP submitted to EPA shall be reviewed
in accordance with the provisions for
review of state implementation plans
(SIPs) set forth in CAA Section 110.
Thus, the TIP must include not only the
substantive rules by which the tribe
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:24 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
proposes to help achieve NAAQS, but
also provide assurances that the tribe
will have adequate personnel, funding,
and authority to administer the plan, as
required by CAA Section 110(a)(2)(E),
and requirements governing conflicts of
interest, as required by CAA Section
128.1 Under Section 128,
implementation plans must contain
requirements that (1) any ‘‘board or
body’’ that approves permits or
enforcement orders have at least a
majority of members who represent the
public interest and do not derive any
significant portion of their income from
persons subject to the permits or orders
and (2) conflicts of interest are
disclosed. EPA does not intend to read
Section 128 to limit a tribe’s flexibility
in creating a regulatory infrastructure
that ensures an adequate separation
between the regulator and the regulated
entity (59 FR 43956, 43964 (Aug. 25,
1994)).
EPA will evaluate the elements
submitted in each TIP on a case-by-case
basis to ensure the selected program is
reasonably severable under the CAA,
and that the TIP has control measures
that adequately address the specific
types of pollution of concern on the
reservation. Once EPA approves the TIP,
its provisions are enforceable by the
tribe, by EPA, and by citizens. As with
SIPs, EPA maintains an ongoing
oversight role to ensure the approved
TIP is adequately implemented and
enforced and to provide technical and
policy assistance. An important aspect
of EPA’s oversight role is that EPA
retains legal authority to bring an
enforcement action against a source
violating the approved TIP.
III. Analysis of the Mohegan TIP
1. Are the Mohegans eligible to run their
CAA air program?
On December 29, 2006, EPA
determined that the Mohegan Tribe of
Indians of Connecticut has
demonstrated that it is eligible to be
treated in the same manner as a state for
the limited purpose of administering the
Mohegan TIP and other similar
programs to regulate minor sources of
air pollution under Section 110 of the
Act (42 U.S.C. 7410) within the
Mohegan Reservation, as those
1 See Section 110(a)(2)(E) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
7410(a)(2)(E), which requires all implementation
plans to contain the requirements described in
Section 128 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7428. Tribal
implementation plans must comply with Section
128, as neither Section 110(a)(2)(E) nor Section 128
of the Act are listed in the TAR as provisions that
are inapplicable to tribes seeking TIP approval
under the Act. See 40 CFR 49.4. EPA explicitly
contemplated the applicability of Section 128 in the
preamble to the proposed TAR. See 59 FR 43956,
43964 (Aug. 25, 1994).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
boundaries existed on May 4, 2005 and
as described in the revision to the
Tribe’s eligibility application submitted
August 16, 2006. EPA’s analysis of the
Tribe’s eligibility and its final
determination of the Tribe’s
jurisdictional assertion under the TAR
may be found in the electronic docket
for this action.
2. Does the Mohegan TIP meet all CAA
requirements?
As described below, we are satisfied
that the Mohegan TIP adequately
addresses the requirements of CAA
Section 110(a)(2)(C). Under CAA
Section 110(k), EPA determined the
Mohegan TIP was complete on July 6,
2005, using the completeness criteria set
forth in Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51.
As part of this completeness
determination, we noted that the
application included a description of
how the Tribe intends to implement the
TIP and provided evidence that the Area
Wide NOX Emissions Limitation
Regulation (NOX Regulation) and other
necessary tribal laws were properly
adopted. In accordance with CAA
Section 110(a), the Tribe issued a public
notice soliciting comments on its
proposed TIP on February 25, 2005,
held a public hearing on March 28, 2005
at the Mohegan Reservation in
Uncasville, CT, and closed the public
comment period on March 30, 2005
with no comments received. On August
22, 2007, the Tribe submitted an
amendment to the NOX Regulation
described below.
Stationary sources owned by the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority have
the potential to emit 2 NOX in major
source amounts, but have actual
emissions that are below the major
source thresholds. The primary
objective for this rulemaking is to create
a mechanism by which the emission
limit for stationary sources owned by
the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
located within the exterior boundaries
of the Mohegan Reservation is
enforceable as a practical matter. The
Mohegan TIP is the equivalent of a
permit that keeps the sources in
‘‘synthetic minor’’ status and ensures
that the source is legally prohibited
from operating as a major source. In
other words, even though units owned
by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming
Authority have the potential to emit
NOX in major source amounts, they will
be considered minor sources and will
avoid triggering CAA major source
requirements because the units
2 Potential to emit means the maximum capacity
of a stationary source to emit any air pollutant
under its physical and operational design.
E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM
06SEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
collectively will be subject to an
enforceable emissions limitation. Actual
NOX emissions from these units have
never approached the major source
thresholds. When the Tribe first
submitted the NOX Regulation, the cap
on NOX emissions in effect under the
regulation was 99 tons per year (TPY).
The Tribe subsequently amended the
NOX Regulation to lower that cap to 49
TPY, because the Tribe has chosen to
enforce a limit below the threshold for
major sources of NOX applicable in the
Greater Connecticut air quality planning
area outside of and surrounding the
Tribe’s reservation. In accordance with
CAA Section 110(a)(2)(B), the NOX
ordinance also contains monitoring,
recordkeeping, reporting, and testing
requirements as needed to assure
compliance with the synthetic minor
limit.
The Mohegan TIP will be
administered primarily by the Mohegan
Environmental Protection Department
and enforced via the Gaming Disputes
Court, a tribal court with exclusive
jurisdiction over disputes arising out of
or in connection with any action of the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority.
Under the NOX Regulation, the
Administrator of the Mohegan
Environmental Protection Department
may issue a citation requiring an
individual to appear before the Gaming
Disputes Court for a judicial hearing on
an alleged violation of the NOX
Regulation or, in emergencies, petition
the Court for a cease and desist order.
After hearing, the Gaming Disputes
Court may issue final orders imposing
injunctive relief and/or civil penalties of
up to $25,000 per violation per day. In
addition, the Mohegan Tribe of Indians
of Connecticut and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency have
entered into a Memorandum of
Agreement by which, for the purposes
of criminal enforcement, the Tribe will
provide potential investigative leads to
EPA and/or other appropriate Federal
agencies, as agreed to by the parties, in
an appropriate and timely manner.
As noted above, CAA Section
110(a)(2)(E) requires an implementation
plan to ‘‘provide * * * necessary
assurances that the [applicant] * * *
will have adequate personnel, funding,
and authority under [tribal] law to carry
out such implementation plan.’’ The
Tribal Application contains such
assurances and cites a provision of the
MEPD Ordinance requiring the Tribal
Council to ‘‘provide such funding to the
Department that will ensure that the
Department can, at a minimum,
appropriately develop, implement,
monitor, and enforce the Tribal
Implementation Plan and any other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:24 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
environmental programs approved by
the Tribal Council.’’
To demonstrate compliance with CAA
Section 128, the Tribe submitted, as part
of the Mohegan TIP, the Mohegan Tribal
Ethics Ordinance. Under Section 4,
Standard E of the Ethics Ordinance,
‘‘public officials,’’ or persons holding
elected or appointed office, are
prohibited from having or subsequently
acquiring any ‘‘direct or indirect
financial or other economic interests’’
that are in conflict with interests of the
Tribe. Under Standard F, if required to
act on a matter in which the public
official has a personal economic interest
(e.g., the Tribe wishes to purchase a
parcel of land in which the public
official has an interest), the public
official must disclose such interest and
abstain from participating in the
deliberation and decision making
process.3 According to the Tribe, the
Ethics Ordinance applies to the judges
of the Gaming Disputes Court.
Given the structure of the NOX
Regulation, the Ethics Ordinance need
only apply to the judges of the Gaming
Disputes Court and not to the MEPD
Administrator. First, under the NOX
Regulation, the MEPD Administrator is
authorized only to issue a citation
requiring an alleged violator to appear
before the Court or to petition the Court
for a cease and desist order.
Enforcement orders for both civil
penalties and injunctive relief are issued
only by the Court. In other words, the
Court is the ‘‘board or body’’ that
ultimately ‘‘approves * * *
enforcement orders.’’ Second, while the
MEPD Administrator must approve
emissions factors to be used in
calculating NOX emissions, as well as
any construction or modification of NOX
sources, both of which resemble the
grant of a permit, the NOX Regulation
requires the Administrator to give
approval whenever specified standards
are met. Because this duty to approve is
nondiscretionary, the MEPD
Administrator need not be, and is not,
subject to the Ethics Ordinance.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Mohegan TIP that was submitted on
May 4, 2005, and amended on August
22, 2007 for limiting NOX emissions
from stationary sources owned by the
3 Section 5 of the Ethics Ordinance requires
members of the Tribal Council and the Council of
Elders and appointed public officials with fiscal
responsibilities to file annual economic disclosure
statements. An example disclosure statement is on
file with EPA Region I. However, the Mohegan
‘‘board or body’’ at issue here is covered by neither
category and, thus, not required to file such
statements.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51207
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority to 49
TPY. EPA is soliciting public comments
on the issues discussed in this notice or
on other relevant matters. These
comments will be considered before
taking final action. Interested parties
may participate in the Federal
rulemaking procedure by submitting
written comments to the EPA New
England Regional Office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this Federal
Register.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
tribal law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
tribal law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under tribal law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by tribal law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
Since this rule simply approves preexisting tribal law, it does not result in
any direct costs or preemption of tribal
law as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Nonetheless, EPA has consulted
extensively with the Mohegan Tribe
concerning this proposed TIP approval.
This action also does not have
Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
approves a tribal rule implementing a
federal standard within the exterior
boundaries of the Tribe’s reservation,
and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to
E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM
06SEP1
51208
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’(62 FR 19885,
April 13, 1997), because it approves a
tribal rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing TIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve tribal choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the Tribe to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a TIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a TIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a TIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 49
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Indians,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E7–17535 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07–3623; MB Docket No. 07–174; RM–
11387]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Walden,
CO
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document sets forth a
proposal to amend the FM Table of
Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 73.202(b).
The Commission requests comment on
a petition filed by Laramie Mountain
Broadcasting, LLC. Petitioner proposes
the allotment of Channel 226C3 at
Walden, Colorado, as a potential second
local aural service. Channel 226C3 can
be allotted at Walden in compliance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:24 Sep 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
with the Commission’s minimum
distance separation requirements with a
site restriction of 20.6 km (12.8 miles)
west of Walden. The proposed
coordinates for Channel 226C3 at
Walden are 40–42–01 North Latitude
and 106–31–21 West Longitude.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before October 8, 2007, and reply
comments on or before October 23,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In
addition to filing comments with the
FCC, interested parties should serve
counsel for the designated petitioner as
follows: A. Wray Fitch, III, Esq.,
Gammon & Grange, P.C., 8280
Greensboro Drive, Seventh Floor,
McLean, Virginia 22102–3807.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau (202)
418–7072.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
07–174, adopted August 15, 2007, and
released August 17, 2007. The full text
of this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center (Room
CY–A257), 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of this decision may also be
purchased from the Commission’s copy
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378–3160,
or via the company’s Web site, https://
www.bcpiweb.com. This document does
not contain proposed information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506 (C)(4).
The Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contacts.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Radio broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.202
[Amended]
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM
Allotments under Colorado, is amended
by adding Walden, Channel 226C3.
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7–17438 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07–3621; MB Docket No. 07–176; RM–
11389]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Humboldt, NE
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document sets forth a
proposal to amend the FM Table of
Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 73.202(b).
The Commission requests comment on
a petition filed by Cumulus Licensing
LLC. Petitioner proposes the allotment
of Channel 272C3 at Humboldt,
Nebraska, in order to maintain that
community’s first local service.
(Petitioner, the permittee of Channel
244C3 at Humboldt, has filed an
application to move the channel to
Effingham, Kansas, as that community’s
first local service.) Channel 272C3 can
be allotted at Humboldt in compliance
with the Commission’s minimum
distance separation requirements at city
reference coordinates, without site
restriction. The proposed coordinates
for Channel 272C3 at Humboldt are 40–
09–51 North Latitude and 95–56–40
West Longitude.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before October 8, 2007, and reply
comments on or before October 23,
2007.
E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM
06SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 172 (Thursday, September 6, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51204-51208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17535]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 49
[EPA-R01-OAR-2005-TR-0001; A-1-FRL-8463-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve a Tribal Implementation Plan
submitted by the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut. The TIP
establishes an enforceable cap on nitrogen oxide emissions from
stationary sources owned by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority and
located within the external boundaries of the Mohegan Reservation. This
action is intended to help attain the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone. This action is being taken in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R01-OAR-2005-TR-0001 by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918-0653.
4. Mail: ``Docket Identification Number EPA-R01-OAR-2005-TR-0001'',
Dan Brown, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code CAP),
Boston, MA 02114-2023.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: Dan Brown,
[[Page 51205]]
Manager, Air Permits, Toxics and Indoor Air Unit, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAP), Boston, MA
02114-2023 Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional
Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding
legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-
2005-TR-0001. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http:/
/www.regulations.gov, or e-mail, information that you consider to be
CBI or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem Protection,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at
all possible, you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30 excluding legal holidays.
In addition to the publicly available docket materials available
for inspection electronically in the Federal Docket Management System
at https://www.regulations.gov, and the hard copy available at the
Regional Office, which are identified in the ADDRESSES section of this
Federal Register, copies of the Tribe's submittal and EPA's technical
support document are also available for public inspection during normal
business hours, by appointment at the Mohegan Tribe, Mohegan
Environmental Protection Department, 49 Sandy Desert Road, Uncasville,
CT 06382, telephone number (860) 862-6112.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida E. McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics
and Indoor Air Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One Congress
Street, 11th floor, (CAP), Boston, MA 02114-2023, telephone number
(617) 918-1653, fax number (617) 918-0653, e-mail
mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Organization of this document.
The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in
this preamble.
I. Background to This Rulemaking
II. CAA Requirements and the Role of the Tribes
1. How did the 1990 CAA Amendments include the tribes?
2. What criteria must a tribe demonstrate to be treated in the
same manner as a state under the CAA?
3. What is an implementation plan for criteria air pollutants
and what must it contain?
III. Analysis of the Mohegan TIP
1. Are the Mohegans eligible to run their CAA air program?
2. Does the Mohegan TIP meet all CAA requirements?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background to This Rulemaking
On May 4, 2005, the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut (the
Tribe) submitted a Tribal Implementation Plan (Mohegan TIP) for
approval by the EPA under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Mohegan TIP
consists of a tribal ordinance, entitled ``Area Wide NOX
Emissions Limitation Regulation,'' that establishes a limit on nitrogen
oxide (NOX) emissions from stationary sources owned by the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority and located within the external
boundaries of the Mohegan Reservation. On August 22, 2007, the Tribe
submitted an amendment to the Mohegan TIP.
II. CAA Requirements and the Role of the Tribes
1. How did the 1990 CAA Amendments include the tribes?
Under the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA may
approve eligible tribes to administer certain provisions of the CAA.
Pursuant to Section 301(d)(2) of the CAA, EPA promulgated the Tribal
Authority Rule (TAR) on February 12, 1998 (63 FR 7254). The TAR
specifies the CAA provisions for which it is appropriate to treat
tribes in the same manner as states, the eligibility criteria the
tribes must meet if they choose to seek such treatment, and the
procedure by which EPA reviews a tribe's request for an eligibility
determination.
As a general matter, EPA determined in the TAR that it is not
appropriate to treat tribes in the same manner as states for purposes
of specific plan submittal and implementation deadlines for NAAQS-
related requirements. 40 CFR 49.4. Thus, tribes are generally not
subject to CAA provisions which specify a deadline by which something
must be accomplished. So, for example, provisions mandating the
submission of state implementation plans do not apply to the tribes.
Furthermore, under the TAR (40 CFR 49.7(c)), a tribe may choose to
implement reasonably severable portions of the various CAA programs, as
long as it can demonstrate that its proposed air program is not
integrally related to program elements that are not included in the
plan submittal and is consistent with applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements. So, for example, a tribe may choose to submit
a TIP that uses a limited set of methods to control just one or two air
pollutants. This modular approach is intended to give tribes the
flexibility to address their most pressing air resource issues and
acknowledges that tribes often have limited resources with which to
address their environmental concerns. Consistent with the exceptions
listed in 40 CFR 49.4, once submitted, a tribe's proposed air program
will be evaluated in accordance with applicable statutory and
regulatory criteria in a manner similar to the way EPA would review a
similar state submittal. 40 CFR 49.8(h).
[[Page 51206]]
EPA expects tribes to fully implement and enforce their approved
programs and, as with states, EPA retains its discretionary authority
to impose sanctions for failure to implement an air program.
Where the provisions of the act or implementing regulations
governing the program for which the tribe seeks approval require
criminal enforcement authority, the tribe may enter into a memorandum
of agreement with the appropriate EPA Region to provide for criminal
enforcement by EPA. 40 CFR 49.7(a)(6), 49.8.
2. What criteria must a tribe demonstrate to be treated in the same
manner as a state under the CAA?
Under Section 301(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601, and the
TAR (at 40 CFR 49.6), EPA may treat a tribe in the same manner as a
state for purposes of administering certain CAA programs or grants if
the tribe demonstrates that (1) it is federally recognized; (2) it has
a governing body carrying out substantial governmental duties and
powers; (3) the functions to be exercised by the tribe pertain to the
management and protection of air resources within the tribe's
reservation or within non-reservation areas under the tribe's
jurisdiction; and (4) it can reasonably be expected to be capable of
carrying out the functions for which it seeks approval.
3. What is an implementation plan for criteria air pollutants and what
must it contain?
Implementation plans are a set of programs and regulations
submitted by states and, if they so choose, by tribes, that outline a
definite plan by which the state or tribe intends to help attain or
maintain NAAQS. NAAQS have been established for the following six
pollutants: Ozone; carbon monoxide; particulate matter; sulfur dioxide;
lead; and nitrogen dioxide. The EPA calls these pollutants ``criteria
pollutants'' because the original standards were based on information
in air quality criteria documents developed for pollutants that
``endanger the public health or welfare''. Once approved by EPA,
implementation plans become enforceable as a matter of federal law.
Implementation plans are governed by Section 110 of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7410. Under Sections 110(o) and 301(d) of the CAA and the TAR
(40 CFR 49.9(h)), any TIP submitted to EPA shall be reviewed in
accordance with the provisions for review of state implementation plans
(SIPs) set forth in CAA Section 110. Thus, the TIP must include not
only the substantive rules by which the tribe proposes to help achieve
NAAQS, but also provide assurances that the tribe will have adequate
personnel, funding, and authority to administer the plan, as required
by CAA Section 110(a)(2)(E), and requirements governing conflicts of
interest, as required by CAA Section 128.\1\ Under Section 128,
implementation plans must contain requirements that (1) any ``board or
body'' that approves permits or enforcement orders have at least a
majority of members who represent the public interest and do not derive
any significant portion of their income from persons subject to the
permits or orders and (2) conflicts of interest are disclosed. EPA does
not intend to read Section 128 to limit a tribe's flexibility in
creating a regulatory infrastructure that ensures an adequate
separation between the regulator and the regulated entity (59 FR 43956,
43964 (Aug. 25, 1994)).
EPA will evaluate the elements submitted in each TIP on a case-by-
case basis to ensure the selected program is reasonably severable under
the CAA, and that the TIP has control measures that adequately address
the specific types of pollution of concern on the reservation. Once EPA
approves the TIP, its provisions are enforceable by the tribe, by EPA,
and by citizens. As with SIPs, EPA maintains an ongoing oversight role
to ensure the approved TIP is adequately implemented and enforced and
to provide technical and policy assistance. An important aspect of
EPA's oversight role is that EPA retains legal authority to bring an
enforcement action against a source violating the approved TIP.
III. Analysis of the Mohegan TIP
1. Are the Mohegans eligible to run their CAA air program?
On December 29, 2006, EPA determined that the Mohegan Tribe of
Indians of Connecticut has demonstrated that it is eligible to be
treated in the same manner as a state for the limited purpose of
administering the Mohegan TIP and other similar programs to regulate
minor sources of air pollution under Section 110 of the Act (42 U.S.C.
7410) within the Mohegan Reservation, as those boundaries existed on
May 4, 2005 and as described in the revision to the Tribe's eligibility
application submitted August 16, 2006. EPA's analysis of the Tribe's
eligibility and its final determination of the Tribe's jurisdictional
assertion under the TAR may be found in the electronic docket for this
action.
2. Does the Mohegan TIP meet all CAA requirements?
As described below, we are satisfied that the Mohegan TIP
adequately addresses the requirements of CAA Section 110(a)(2)(C).
Under CAA Section 110(k), EPA determined the Mohegan TIP was complete
on July 6, 2005, using the completeness criteria set forth in Appendix
V of 40 CFR Part 51. As part of this completeness determination, we
noted that the application included a description of how the Tribe
intends to implement the TIP and provided evidence that the Area Wide
NOX Emissions Limitation Regulation (NOX
Regulation) and other necessary tribal laws were properly adopted. In
accordance with CAA Section 110(a), the Tribe issued a public notice
soliciting comments on its proposed TIP on February 25, 2005, held a
public hearing on March 28, 2005 at the Mohegan Reservation in
Uncasville, CT, and closed the public comment period on March 30, 2005
with no comments received. On August 22, 2007, the Tribe submitted an
amendment to the NOX Regulation described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Section 110(a)(2)(E) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
7410(a)(2)(E), which requires all implementation plans to contain
the requirements described in Section 128 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
7428. Tribal implementation plans must comply with Section 128, as
neither Section 110(a)(2)(E) nor Section 128 of the Act are listed
in the TAR as provisions that are inapplicable to tribes seeking TIP
approval under the Act. See 40 CFR 49.4. EPA explicitly contemplated
the applicability of Section 128 in the preamble to the proposed
TAR. See 59 FR 43956, 43964 (Aug. 25, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stationary sources owned by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
have the potential to emit \2\ NOX in major source amounts,
but have actual emissions that are below the major source thresholds.
The primary objective for this rulemaking is to create a mechanism by
which the emission limit for stationary sources owned by the Mohegan
Tribal Gaming Authority located within the exterior boundaries of the
Mohegan Reservation is enforceable as a practical matter. The Mohegan
TIP is the equivalent of a permit that keeps the sources in ``synthetic
minor'' status and ensures that the source is legally prohibited from
operating as a major source. In other words, even though units owned by
the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority have the potential to emit
NOX in major source amounts, they will be considered minor
sources and will avoid triggering CAA major source requirements because
the units
[[Page 51207]]
collectively will be subject to an enforceable emissions limitation.
Actual NOX emissions from these units have never approached
the major source thresholds. When the Tribe first submitted the
NOX Regulation, the cap on NOX emissions in
effect under the regulation was 99 tons per year (TPY). The Tribe
subsequently amended the NOX Regulation to lower that cap to
49 TPY, because the Tribe has chosen to enforce a limit below the
threshold for major sources of NOX applicable in the Greater
Connecticut air quality planning area outside of and surrounding the
Tribe's reservation. In accordance with CAA Section 110(a)(2)(B), the
NOX ordinance also contains monitoring, recordkeeping,
reporting, and testing requirements as needed to assure compliance with
the synthetic minor limit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Potential to emit means the maximum capacity of a stationary
source to emit any air pollutant under its physical and operational
design.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mohegan TIP will be administered primarily by the Mohegan
Environmental Protection Department and enforced via the Gaming
Disputes Court, a tribal court with exclusive jurisdiction over
disputes arising out of or in connection with any action of the Mohegan
Tribal Gaming Authority. Under the NOX Regulation, the
Administrator of the Mohegan Environmental Protection Department may
issue a citation requiring an individual to appear before the Gaming
Disputes Court for a judicial hearing on an alleged violation of the
NOX Regulation or, in emergencies, petition the Court for a
cease and desist order. After hearing, the Gaming Disputes Court may
issue final orders imposing injunctive relief and/or civil penalties of
up to $25,000 per violation per day. In addition, the Mohegan Tribe of
Indians of Connecticut and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement by which, for the purposes
of criminal enforcement, the Tribe will provide potential investigative
leads to EPA and/or other appropriate Federal agencies, as agreed to by
the parties, in an appropriate and timely manner.
As noted above, CAA Section 110(a)(2)(E) requires an implementation
plan to ``provide * * * necessary assurances that the [applicant] * * *
will have adequate personnel, funding, and authority under [tribal] law
to carry out such implementation plan.'' The Tribal Application
contains such assurances and cites a provision of the MEPD Ordinance
requiring the Tribal Council to ``provide such funding to the
Department that will ensure that the Department can, at a minimum,
appropriately develop, implement, monitor, and enforce the Tribal
Implementation Plan and any other environmental programs approved by
the Tribal Council.''
To demonstrate compliance with CAA Section 128, the Tribe
submitted, as part of the Mohegan TIP, the Mohegan Tribal Ethics
Ordinance. Under Section 4, Standard E of the Ethics Ordinance,
``public officials,'' or persons holding elected or appointed office,
are prohibited from having or subsequently acquiring any ``direct or
indirect financial or other economic interests'' that are in conflict
with interests of the Tribe. Under Standard F, if required to act on a
matter in which the public official has a personal economic interest
(e.g., the Tribe wishes to purchase a parcel of land in which the
public official has an interest), the public official must disclose
such interest and abstain from participating in the deliberation and
decision making process.\3\ According to the Tribe, the Ethics
Ordinance applies to the judges of the Gaming Disputes Court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Section 5 of the Ethics Ordinance requires members of the
Tribal Council and the Council of Elders and appointed public
officials with fiscal responsibilities to file annual economic
disclosure statements. An example disclosure statement is on file
with EPA Region I. However, the Mohegan ``board or body'' at issue
here is covered by neither category and, thus, not required to file
such statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the structure of the NOX Regulation, the Ethics
Ordinance need only apply to the judges of the Gaming Disputes Court
and not to the MEPD Administrator. First, under the NOX
Regulation, the MEPD Administrator is authorized only to issue a
citation requiring an alleged violator to appear before the Court or to
petition the Court for a cease and desist order. Enforcement orders for
both civil penalties and injunctive relief are issued only by the
Court. In other words, the Court is the ``board or body'' that
ultimately ``approves * * * enforcement orders.'' Second, while the
MEPD Administrator must approve emissions factors to be used in
calculating NOX emissions, as well as any construction or
modification of NOX sources, both of which resemble the
grant of a permit, the NOX Regulation requires the
Administrator to give approval whenever specified standards are met.
Because this duty to approve is nondiscretionary, the MEPD
Administrator need not be, and is not, subject to the Ethics Ordinance.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the Mohegan TIP that was submitted on
May 4, 2005, and amended on August 22, 2007 for limiting NOX
emissions from stationary sources owned by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming
Authority to 49 TPY. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues
discussed in this notice or on other relevant matters. These comments
will be considered before taking final action. Interested parties may
participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written
comments to the EPA New England Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this Federal Register.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves tribal law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by tribal law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under tribal law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
tribal law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Since this rule simply approves pre-existing tribal law, it does
not result in any direct costs or preemption of tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Nonetheless,
EPA has consulted extensively with the Mohegan Tribe concerning this
proposed TIP approval. This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a tribal rule
implementing a federal standard within the exterior boundaries of the
Tribe's reservation, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This rule also is not subject to
[[Page 51208]]
Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks''(62 FR 19885, April 13, 1997), because
it approves a tribal rule implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing TIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve tribal
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
Tribe to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a TIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a TIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a TIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 49
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Indians, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E7-17535 Filed 9-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P