Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls, 50912-50913 [E7-17525]
Download as PDF
50912
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 171
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Chapter VII
[Docket No. 070827486–7487–01]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export
Controls
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for Comments on
Foreign Policy-based Export Controls.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is reviewing the foreign
policy-based export controls in the
Export Administration Regulations to
determine whether they should be
modified, rescinded or extended. To
help make these determinations, BIS is
seeking comments on how existing
foreign policy-based export controls
have affected exporters and the general
public.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
sent by e-mail to
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
‘‘FPBEC’’ in the subject line of the
message. Written comments (three
copies) may be submitted by mail or
hand delivery to Jeffery Lynch,
Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington,
DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan
Roberts, Foreign Policy Division, Office
of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Telephone: (202) 482–4252.
Copies of the current Annual Foreign
Policy Report to the Congress are
available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/
PoliciesAndRegulations/
07ForPolControls/index.htm and copies
may also be requested by calling the
Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance at the number listed above.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:47 Sep 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
Foreign
policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are
implemented pursuant to Section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended. The current foreign policybased export controls maintained by the
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
are set forth in the EAR, including in
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744
(End-User and End-Use Based Controls)
and 746 (Embargoes and Special
Country Controls). These controls apply
to a range of countries, items, activities
and persons, including: Certain general
purpose microprocessors for ‘military
end-uses’ and ‘military end-users’
(§ 744.17); significant items (SI): Hot
section technology for the development,
production, or overhaul of commercial
aircraft engines, components, and
systems (§ 742.14); encryption items
(§§ 742.15 and 744.9); crime control and
detection commodities (§ 742.7);
specially designed implements of
torture (§ 742.11); certain firearms
included within the Inter-American
Convention Against the Illicit
Manufacturing of and Trafficking in
Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and
Other Related Materials (§ 742.17);
regional stability items (§ 742.6);
equipment and related technical data
used in the design, development,
production, or use of certain rocket
systems and unmanned air vehicles
(§§ 742.5 and 744.3); chemical
precursors and biological agents,
associated equipment, technical data,
and software related to the production
of chemical and biological agents
(§§ 742.2 and 744.4) and various
chemicals included in those controlled
pursuant to the Chemical Weapons
Convention (§ 742.18); nuclear
propulsion (§ 744.5); aircraft and vessels
(§ 744.7); communication intercepting
devices (software and technology)
(§ 742.13); embargoed countries (part
746); countries designated as supporters
of acts of international terrorism
(§§ 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2,
746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities
in Russia (§ 744.10); individual
terrorists and terrorist organizations
(§§ 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain
persons designated by Executive Order
13315 (‘‘Blocking Property of the
Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials
and Their Family Members’’) (§ 744.18);
and certain sanctioned entities
(§ 744.20). Attention is also given in this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
context to the controls on nuclearrelated commodities and technology
(§§ 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part,
implemented under section 309(c) of the
Nuclear Non Proliferation Act.
Under the provisions of section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (EAA), export controls
maintained for foreign policy purposes
require annual extension. Section 6 of
the EAA requires a report to Congress
when foreign policy-based export
controls are extended. The EAA expired
on August 20, 2001. Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has been
extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of
August 15, 2007 (72 FR 46137, August
16, 2007), continues the EAR and, to the
extent permitted by law, the provisions
of the EAA, in effect under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706
(2000)). The Department of Commerce,
insofar as appropriate, is following the
provisions of section 6 in reviewing
foreign policy-based export controls,
requesting public comments on such
controls, and submitting a report to
Congress.
In January 2007, the Secretary of
Commerce, on the recommendation of
the Secretary of State, extended for one
year all foreign policy-based export
controls then in effect.
To assure maximum public
participation in the review process,
comments are solicited on the extension
or revision of the existing foreign
policy-based export controls for another
year. Among the criteria considered in
determining whether to continue or
revise U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls
will achieve the intended foreign policy
purpose, in light of other factors,
including the availability from other
countries of the goods, software or
technology proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy purpose
of such controls can be achieved
through negotiations or other alternative
means;
3. The compatibility of the controls
with the foreign policy objectives of the
United States and with overall United
States policy toward the country subject
to the controls;
4. Whether reaction of other countries
to the extension of such controls by the
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
United States is not likely to render the
controls ineffective in achieving the
intended foreign policy purpose or be
counterproductive to United States
foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S.
foreign policy objectives versus the
effect of the controls on the export
performance of the United States, the
competitive position of the United
States in the international economy, the
international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and
technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to
enforce the controls effectively.
BIS is particularly interested in
receiving comments on the economic
impact of proliferation controls. BIS is
also interested in industry information
relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign
policy-based export controls on sales of
U.S. products to third countries (i.e.,
those countries not targeted by
sanctions), including the views of
foreign purchasers or prospective
customers regarding U.S. foreign policybased export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained
by U.S. trade partners. For example, to
what extent do they have similar
controls on goods and technology on a
worldwide basis or to specific
destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or
practices by our foreign trade partners
which are similar to U.S. foreign policybased export controls, including license
review criteria, use of conditions,
requirements for pre and post shipment
verifications (preferably supported by
examples of approvals, denials and
foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign
policy-based export controls that would
bring them more into line with
multilateral practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to
actions that would make multilateral
controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade or acquisitions by
intended targets of the controls.
7. Data or other information as to the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on overall trade at the level of
individual industrial sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure
the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign
policy-based export controls on targeted
countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments
relating generally to the extension or
revision of existing foreign policy-based
export controls.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:47 Sep 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
Parties submitting comments are
asked to be as specific as possible. All
comments received before the close of
the comment period will be considered
by BIS in reviewing the controls and
developing the report to Congress.
All information relating to the notice
will be a matter of public record and
will be available for public inspection
and copying. In the interest of accuracy
and completeness, BIS requires written
comments. Oral comments must be
followed by written memoranda, which
will also be a matter of public record
and will be available for public review
and copying.
The Office of Administration, Bureau
of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, displays
these public comments on BIS’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web
site at https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia. This
office does not maintain a separate
public inspection facility. If you have
technical difficulties accessing this Web
site, please call BIS’s Office of
Administration at (202) 482–0637 for
assistance.
Dated: August 29, 2007.
Christopher A. Padilla,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17525 Filed 9–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R07–OAR–2007–0655; FRL–8462–8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; Iowa; Clean Air Mercury
Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
the State Plan submitted by Iowa on
August 15, 2006, and revisions
submitted on April 26, 2007. The plan
addresses the requirements of EPA’s
Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR),
promulgated on May 18, 2005, and
subsequently revised on June 9, 2006.
EPA is proposing to determine that the
submitted State Plan fully meets the
CAMR requirements for Iowa.
CAMR requires States to regulate
emissions of mercury (Hg) from large
coal-fired electric generating units
(EGUs). CAMR establishes State budgets
for annual EGU Hg emissions and
requires States to submit State Plans to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50913
ensure that annual EGU Hg emissions
will not exceed the applicable State
budget. States have the flexibility to
choose which control measures to adopt
to achieve the budgets, including
participating in the EPA-administered
CAMR cap-and-trade program. In the
State Plan that EPA is proposing to
approve Iowa would meet CAMR
requirements by participating in the
EPA trading program.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2007–0655, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: jay.michael@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Michael Jay, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to: Michael Jay,
Environmental Protection Agency, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2007–
0655. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 5, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50912-50913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17525]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 5, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 50912]]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Chapter VII
[Docket No. 070827486-7487-01]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for Comments on Foreign Policy-based Export Controls.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is reviewing the
foreign policy-based export controls in the Export Administration
Regulations to determine whether they should be modified, rescinded or
extended. To help make these determinations, BIS is seeking comments on
how existing foreign policy-based export controls have affected
exporters and the general public.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be sent by e-mail to
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include ``FPBEC'' in the subject line of
the message. Written comments (three copies) may be submitted by mail
or hand delivery to Jeffery Lynch, Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau
of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street &
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Roberts, Foreign Policy Division,
Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Telephone: (202) 482-4252. Copies of the current Annual
Foreign Policy Report to the Congress are available at https://
www.bis.doc.gov/PoliciesAndRegulations/07ForPolControls/index.htm and
copies may also be requested by calling the Office of Nonproliferation
and Treaty Compliance at the number listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to Section 6
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended. The current
foreign policy-based export controls maintained by the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) are set forth in the EAR, including in
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based
Controls) and 746 (Embargoes and Special Country Controls). These
controls apply to a range of countries, items, activities and persons,
including: Certain general purpose microprocessors for `military end-
uses' and `military end-users' (Sec. 744.17); significant items (SI):
Hot section technology for the development, production, or overhaul of
commercial aircraft engines, components, and systems (Sec. 742.14);
encryption items (Sec. Sec. 742.15 and 744.9); crime control and
detection commodities (Sec. 742.7); specially designed implements of
torture (Sec. 742.11); certain firearms included within the Inter-
American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and
Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related
Materials (Sec. 742.17); regional stability items (Sec. 742.6);
equipment and related technical data used in the design, development,
production, or use of certain rocket systems and unmanned air vehicles
(Sec. Sec. 742.5 and 744.3); chemical precursors and biological
agents, associated equipment, technical data, and software related to
the production of chemical and biological agents (Sec. Sec. 742.2 and
744.4) and various chemicals included in those controlled pursuant to
the Chemical Weapons Convention (Sec. 742.18); nuclear propulsion
(Sec. 744.5); aircraft and vessels (Sec. 744.7); communication
intercepting devices (software and technology) (Sec. 742.13);
embargoed countries (part 746); countries designated as supporters of
acts of international terrorism (Sec. Sec. 742.8, 742.9, 742.10,
742.19, 746.2, 746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities in Russia
(Sec. 744.10); individual terrorists and terrorist organizations
(Sec. Sec. 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain persons designated by
Executive Order 13315 (``Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime,
Its Senior Officials and Their Family Members'') (Sec. 744.18); and
certain sanctioned entities (Sec. 744.20). Attention is also given in
this context to the controls on nuclear-related commodities and
technology (Sec. Sec. 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part,
implemented under section 309(c) of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Act.
Under the provisions of section 6 of the Export Administration Act
of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec. 2401-2420 (2000)) (EAA),
export controls maintained for foreign policy purposes require annual
extension. Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when
foreign policy-based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on
August 20, 2001. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive
Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 15, 2007 (72
FR 46137, August 16, 2007), continues the EAR and, to the extent
permitted by law, the provisions of the EAA, in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706
(2000)). The Department of Commerce, insofar as appropriate, is
following the provisions of section 6 in reviewing foreign policy-based
export controls, requesting public comments on such controls, and
submitting a report to Congress.
In January 2007, the Secretary of Commerce, on the recommendation
of the Secretary of State, extended for one year all foreign policy-
based export controls then in effect.
To assure maximum public participation in the review process,
comments are solicited on the extension or revision of the existing
foreign policy-based export controls for another year. Among the
criteria considered in determining whether to continue or revise U.S.
foreign policy-based export controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve the intended
foreign policy purpose, in light of other factors, including the
availability from other countries of the goods, software or technology
proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy purpose of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy
objectives of the United States and with overall United States policy
toward the country subject to the controls;
4. Whether reaction of other countries to the extension of such
controls by the
[[Page 50913]]
United States is not likely to render the controls ineffective in
achieving the intended foreign policy purpose or be counterproductive
to United States foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives
versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the
United States, the competitive position of the United States in the
international economy, the international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to enforce the controls
effectively.
BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in
industry information relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on sales of U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those
countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign
purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policy-based
export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For
example, to what extent do they have similar controls on goods and
technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign
trade partners which are similar to U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions,
requirements for pre and post shipment verifications (preferably
supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign policy-based export
controls that would bring them more into line with multilateral
practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to actions that would make
multilateral controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the
controls.
7. Data or other information as to the effect of foreign policy-
based export controls on overall trade at the level of individual
industrial sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure the effect of foreign policy-
based export controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls
on targeted countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments relating generally to the
extension or revision of existing foreign policy-based export controls.
Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as
possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period
will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and developing the
report to Congress.
All information relating to the notice will be a matter of public
record and will be available for public inspection and copying. In the
interest of accuracy and completeness, BIS requires written comments.
Oral comments must be followed by written memoranda, which will also be
a matter of public record and will be available for public review and
copying.
The Office of Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, displays these public comments on BIS's Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) Web site at https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia. This
office does not maintain a separate public inspection facility. If you
have technical difficulties accessing this Web site, please call BIS's
Office of Administration at (202) 482-0637 for assistance.
Dated: August 29, 2007.
Christopher A. Padilla,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-17525 Filed 9-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P