Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Emergency Review and Approval, 50964-50965 [E7-17507]
Download as PDF
50964
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 5, 2007 / Notices
stations), require that the station license
and any other instrument of
authorization be retained in the station’s
files. In addition, the call sign of the
station, together with the name, address
and telephone number of the licensee or
the local representative of the licensee,
and the name and address of the person
and place where the station records are
maintained, shall be displayed at the
transmitter site on the structure
supporting the transmitting antenna.
The Commission is revising this
information collection to remove 47
CFR 74.965 from the information
collection. The rule section was
removed from the CFR. It is no longer
in existence.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–17505 Filed 9–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Public Information Collection
Requirement Submitted to OMB for
Emergency Review and Approval
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
August 30, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden,
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before September 12,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Sep 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
2007. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via e-mail to
nfraser@omb.eop.gov or via fax at 202–
395–5167, and to the Federal
Communications Commission via e-mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or by U.S. mail to Jerry
Cowden, Federal Communications
Commission, Room 1–B135, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information contact Jerry
Cowden via e-mail at PRA@fcc.gov or at
202–418–0447. If you would like to
obtain or view a copy of this
information collection you may do so by
visiting the FCC PRA Web page at:
https://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission is requesting emergency
OMB processing of this information
collection and has requested OMB
approval by September 19, 2007.
OMB Control Number: None.
Title: Information collection for
Emergency Communications Back-Up
System Report to Congress.
Form No.: Not applicable.
Type of Review: New collection.
Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit; not-for-profit institutions; and
state, local or tribal governments.
Number of Respondents: 45
respondents; 45 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 40
hours.
Frequency of Response: One-time
reporting.
Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
Total Annual Burden: 1,800 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $33,000. This is
based on an estimate that half the
respondents (22) will fly a
representative (or representatives) the
equivalent of a coast-to-coast round trip
to Washington, DC and will have
lodging for one night. The average cost
of a single round trip fare and one night
lodging is estimated to be $1500.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
The Commission will work with
respondents to ensure that their
concerns regarding the confidentiality of
any proprietary or business-sensitive
information are resolved in a manner
consistent with the Commission’s rules.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: This
information collection does not affect
individuals or households, and
therefore a privacy impact assessment is
not required.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection sought will enable the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission to fulfill its obligation
under the Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007 (Act), Public
Law 110–53. The purpose of the Act is
to ‘‘provide for the implementation of
the recommendations of the National
Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon
the United States.’’ Towards this end,
the Act mandates that the Commission
‘‘shall conduct a vulnerability
assessment of the Nation’s critical
communications and information
systems infrastructure and shall
evaluate the technical feasibility of
creating a back-up emergency
communications system that
complements existing communications
resources and takes into account next
generation and advanced
communications technologies.’’ The
Commission must submit a report to
Congress that details the findings of this
evaluation not later than 180 days after
the date of enactment of the Act (since
the Act was enacted on August 3, 2007,
the report will be due to Congress on
January 30, 2008).
To complete this report, the
Commission seeks to collect information
primarily through face-to-face meetings,
phone calls (including conference calls),
and e-mail correspondence with
commercial service and network
operators (i.e., private satellite, wireline,
and wireless operators, circuit and
packet network operators), users (or
owners) of emergency communication
systems and networks, (e.g., emergency
responders including first responders,
9–1–1 system and dispatch operators,
federal, state and local emergency
agencies), and their associations,
manufacturers of public safety
equipment and emergency
communications networks and systems,
operators of networks for emergency
responders, and standards organizations
and industry groups working on public
safety equipment and emergency
communications networks and systems
and standards. Information will be
sought concerning emergency
communications networks, including
user devices, network equipment,
operations processes and operations
systems, and concerning the feasibility
of commercial service providers to
support the needs of public safety,
including: (1) Technical capabilities and
characteristics of equipment (e.g.,
analog/digital, power, range, access
protocol, broadband/wideband/
narrowband, etc.), (2) technical
capabilities and characteristics of
commercial services to support the
needs of public safety, (3) cost and
deployment of commercial services for
E:\FR\FM\05SEN1.SGM
05SEN1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 5, 2007 / Notices
use by public safety, (4) cost of user
devices and network equipment of
emergency communications networks
(e.g., unit cost, maintenance/upgrade
cost, etc.), and the cost of operations
and operations systems (including
feature upgrades) for emergency
communications networks and services,
(5) deployment of user devices, network
equipment, and operations processes
and equipment of emergency
communications systems (e.g., type of
systems deployed or to be deployed),
number of units deployed/sold, etc.), (6)
standardization of user devices, network
equipment, and operations interfaces of
emergency communications systems
(e.g., standard/proprietary, standard
activities, etc.), (7) interoperability (i.e.,
the ability of communications among
different systems, devices and groups)
of user groups, user devices, network
equipment, and operations processes
and equipment of emergency
communications systems (e.g.,
interoperability among first responders
within a jurisdiction, among
jurisdictions using the same and
different network technologies), (8)
spectrum usage of user devices and
network equipment of emergency
communications systems (e.g.,
frequencies of operation, shared/
dedicated spectrum, etc.), (9)
applications and application
requirements for end users and the
technical requirements for such
applications including bandwidth
needs, (10) operations systems features
and operations processes supporting
emergency network operation during an
emergency, (11) service capabilities
(e.g., voice, data, video, mobile to
mobile communications, etc.), (12)
evolutionary trend of user devices,
network equipment, and operations of
emergency communications systems
(e.g., next generation, migration path,
etc.), (13) backhaul connectivity of
network equipment and facilities (e.g.,
commercial/private, wired/wireless,
capacity, etc.), (14) description of
network technology and architecture
(e.g., whether the network design
accommodates access to emergency
responders from other jurisdictions,
capability of architecture to support
resiliency in disaster situations, etc.),
(15) operations budget for the network,
(16) responsibilities of the organizations
operating the networks, including
service provisioning, traffic
management and network maintenance,
especially during an emergency, (17)
plans, if any, for restoring emergency
communication services or reverting to
backup networks in the event that a
primary emergency communications
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Sep 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
network is damaged or destroyed, (18)
ability of existing emergency
communications networks to back up or
complement the communication
resources of other emergency
communications networks, (19) ability
to rapidly increase emergency
communication network capacity in the
event that the capacity limits of the
network are exceeded in a major
disaster, (20) a description of the role of
‘‘core services’’ such as authentication
and agency locator services, whether
and how they are implemented in
existing and planned networks, and
their costs, (21) a description of the
processes and systems used or planned
to connect emergency responders to a
back-up network in an emergency, and
(22) plans to restore emergency
communications services if the network
over which they are provided is
damaged, destroyed, or sufficiently
congested to be impaired or unusable
(e.g., changes in operations staffing in
emergency conditions, dynamic
bandwidth allocation to users or
networks, back-up communications for
other emergency communications
services or networks), other
administrative or planning issues
associated with the deployment and
maintenance of such backup national
emergency communications
capabilities.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–17507 Filed 9–4–07; 8:45 am]
50965
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than September 28,
2007.
1. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(David Tatum, Vice President) 1000
Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia
30309:
1. Community First, Inc., Columbia,
Tennessee; to acquire 100 percent of the
voting shares of First National Bank of
Centerville, Centerville, Tennessee.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, August 30, 2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7–17489 Filed 9–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT
INVESTMENT BOARD
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9 a.m. (Eastern Time),
September 17, 2007.
PLACE: 4th Floor Conference Room,
1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005.
STATUS: Parts will be open to the public
and parts closed to the public.
TIME AND DATE:
Matters To Be Considered
Parts Open to the Public
1. Approval of the minutes of the
August 20, 2007 Board member
meeting.
2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by
the Executive Director.
a. Monthly Participant Activity
Report.
b. Monthly Investment Performance
Report.
c. Legislative Report.
3. Increasing Decimal Places in Fund
Prices.
4. Business Assurance and IT
Infrastructure.
5. Annual Budget Report.
E:\FR\FM\05SEN1.SGM
05SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50964-50965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17507]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for
Emergency Review and Approval
August 30, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before September 12, 2007. If you anticipate that you
will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the
period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contacts
listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via e-mail to nfraser@omb.eop.gov or via fax at
202-395-5167, and to the Federal Communications Commission via e-mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or by U.S. mail to Jerry Cowden, Federal Communications
Commission, Room 1-B135, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information contact
Jerry Cowden via e-mail at PRA@fcc.gov or at 202-418-0447. If you would
like to obtain or view a copy of this information collection you may do
so by visiting the FCC PRA Web page at: https://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is requesting emergency OMB
processing of this information collection and has requested OMB
approval by September 19, 2007.
OMB Control Number: None.
Title: Information collection for Emergency Communications Back-Up
System Report to Congress.
Form No.: Not applicable.
Type of Review: New collection.
Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit; not-for-profit
institutions; and state, local or tribal governments.
Number of Respondents: 45 respondents; 45 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 40 hours.
Frequency of Response: One-time reporting.
Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
Total Annual Burden: 1,800 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $33,000. This is based on an estimate that half
the respondents (22) will fly a representative (or representatives) the
equivalent of a coast-to-coast round trip to Washington, DC and will
have lodging for one night. The average cost of a single round trip
fare and one night lodging is estimated to be $1500.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: The Commission will work with
respondents to ensure that their concerns regarding the confidentiality
of any proprietary or business-sensitive information are resolved in a
manner consistent with the Commission's rules.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: This information collection does not
affect individuals or households, and therefore a privacy impact
assessment is not required.
Needs and Uses: The information collection sought will enable the
Commission to fulfill its obligation under the Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Act), Public Law
110-53. The purpose of the Act is to ``provide for the implementation
of the recommendations of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks
Upon the United States.'' Towards this end, the Act mandates that the
Commission ``shall conduct a vulnerability assessment of the Nation's
critical communications and information systems infrastructure and
shall evaluate the technical feasibility of creating a back-up
emergency communications system that complements existing
communications resources and takes into account next generation and
advanced communications technologies.'' The Commission must submit a
report to Congress that details the findings of this evaluation not
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Act (since the
Act was enacted on August 3, 2007, the report will be due to Congress
on January 30, 2008).
To complete this report, the Commission seeks to collect
information primarily through face-to-face meetings, phone calls
(including conference calls), and e-mail correspondence with commercial
service and network operators (i.e., private satellite, wireline, and
wireless operators, circuit and packet network operators), users (or
owners) of emergency communication systems and networks, (e.g.,
emergency responders including first responders, 9-1-1 system and
dispatch operators, federal, state and local emergency agencies), and
their associations, manufacturers of public safety equipment and
emergency communications networks and systems, operators of networks
for emergency responders, and standards organizations and industry
groups working on public safety equipment and emergency communications
networks and systems and standards. Information will be sought
concerning emergency communications networks, including user devices,
network equipment, operations processes and operations systems, and
concerning the feasibility of commercial service providers to support
the needs of public safety, including: (1) Technical capabilities and
characteristics of equipment (e.g., analog/digital, power, range,
access protocol, broadband/wideband/narrowband, etc.), (2) technical
capabilities and characteristics of commercial services to support the
needs of public safety, (3) cost and deployment of commercial services
for
[[Page 50965]]
use by public safety, (4) cost of user devices and network equipment of
emergency communications networks (e.g., unit cost, maintenance/upgrade
cost, etc.), and the cost of operations and operations systems
(including feature upgrades) for emergency communications networks and
services, (5) deployment of user devices, network equipment, and
operations processes and equipment of emergency communications systems
(e.g., type of systems deployed or to be deployed), number of units
deployed/sold, etc.), (6) standardization of user devices, network
equipment, and operations interfaces of emergency communications
systems (e.g., standard/proprietary, standard activities, etc.), (7)
interoperability (i.e., the ability of communications among different
systems, devices and groups) of user groups, user devices, network
equipment, and operations processes and equipment of emergency
communications systems (e.g., interoperability among first responders
within a jurisdiction, among jurisdictions using the same and different
network technologies), (8) spectrum usage of user devices and network
equipment of emergency communications systems (e.g., frequencies of
operation, shared/dedicated spectrum, etc.), (9) applications and
application requirements for end users and the technical requirements
for such applications including bandwidth needs, (10) operations
systems features and operations processes supporting emergency network
operation during an emergency, (11) service capabilities (e.g., voice,
data, video, mobile to mobile communications, etc.), (12) evolutionary
trend of user devices, network equipment, and operations of emergency
communications systems (e.g., next generation, migration path, etc.),
(13) backhaul connectivity of network equipment and facilities (e.g.,
commercial/private, wired/wireless, capacity, etc.), (14) description
of network technology and architecture (e.g., whether the network
design accommodates access to emergency responders from other
jurisdictions, capability of architecture to support resiliency in
disaster situations, etc.), (15) operations budget for the network,
(16) responsibilities of the organizations operating the networks,
including service provisioning, traffic management and network
maintenance, especially during an emergency, (17) plans, if any, for
restoring emergency communication services or reverting to backup
networks in the event that a primary emergency communications network
is damaged or destroyed, (18) ability of existing emergency
communications networks to back up or complement the communication
resources of other emergency communications networks, (19) ability to
rapidly increase emergency communication network capacity in the event
that the capacity limits of the network are exceeded in a major
disaster, (20) a description of the role of ``core services'' such as
authentication and agency locator services, whether and how they are
implemented in existing and planned networks, and their costs, (21) a
description of the processes and systems used or planned to connect
emergency responders to a back-up network in an emergency, and (22)
plans to restore emergency communications services if the network over
which they are provided is damaged, destroyed, or sufficiently
congested to be impaired or unusable (e.g., changes in operations
staffing in emergency conditions, dynamic bandwidth allocation to users
or networks, back-up communications for other emergency communications
services or networks), other administrative or planning issues
associated with the deployment and maintenance of such backup national
emergency communications capabilities.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-17507 Filed 9-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P