Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-11, DC-8-12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 Airplanes; Model DC-8F-54 and DC-8F-55 Airplanes; Model DC-8-50, -60, -60F, -70, and -70F Series Airplanes; Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 Series Airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) Airplanes; and Model MD-88 Airplanes, 50284-50288 [E7-17287]

Download as PDF 50284 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–32A2482, dated June 14, 2007. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from a report of a fractured trunnion fork assembly. We are issuing this AD to prevent a fractured trunnion fork assembly, which could result in the collapse of a wing landing gear on the ground and possible damage to hydraulic equipment and the aileron and spoiler cables. Such damage could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Follow-On Actions for Category A, B, C, or D Trunnion Fork Assemblies Service Bulletin (f) The term ‘‘service bulletin,’’ as used in this AD, means Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–32A2482, dated June 14, 2007. (h) If any part number and serial number identified as Category A, B, C, or D in Tables 2 and 3 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of the service bulletin is found installed during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: At the applicable compliance time(s) listed in Table 4 or 5 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of the service bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD, do the applicable action(s) in Table 1 of this AD and applicable related investigative/ corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Initial Inspection for Part Number, Serial Number, and Category (g) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, inspect the pad-up area on the forward upper inboard surface of the trunnion fork assembly of both the left and right wing landing gears to determine the part number and serial number and to determine the category of the trunnion fork assemblies, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. TABLE 1.—REQUIREMENTS FOR CATEGORY A, B, C, OR D TRUNNION FORK ASSEMBLIES For— Do— And— Or— (1) Categories A and D trunnion fork assemblies. A detailed inspection for damage to the protective finish and for corrosion of the trunnion fork assembly and a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks (Part 2). An ultrasonic inspection to determine the wall thickness in the area forward of the outer cylinder attach lugs in 8 zones, and a hardness measurement (Part 3). An ultrasonic inspection to determine the wall thickness in the area forward of the outer cylinder attach lugs in 8 zones, and a hardness measurement if applicable (Part 3). None ............................................. Do the terminating action (Part 5). (2) Categories B and C trunnion fork assemblies. (i) Where paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of the service bulletin specifies a compliance time after the date on the service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2007. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E7–17284 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am] Terminating Action BILLING CODE 4910–13–P (j) Replacing the trunnion fork assembly of the wing landing gear with a trunnion fork assembly identified in Part 5 of the service bulletin, in accordance with and at the applicable time specified in Table 4 or 5 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of the service bulletin, constitutes terminating action for the requirements of this AD for that side only. yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2007–29061; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–243–AD] Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8– 33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–8–43 Airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC– 8F–55 Airplanes; Model DC–8–50, –60, –60F, –70, and –70F Series Airplanes; Model DC–9–10, –20, –30, –40, and –50 Series Airplanes; Model DC–9–81 (MD– 81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD– 83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) Airplanes; and Model MD–88 Airplanes (k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 15:10 Aug 30, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIN 2120–AA64 Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) VerDate Aug<31>2005 None. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain McDonnell Douglas airplanes. The existing AD currently requires an initial Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM 31AUP1 yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules general visual or dye penetrant inspection, repetitive dye penetrant inspections, and replacement, as necessary, of the rudder pedal bracket. The existing AD also requires, for certain airplanes, replacing the rudder pedal bracket assemblies with new, improved parts, which would terminate the repetitive inspections. This proposed AD would, for certain airplanes, reduce initial inspection thresholds, remove an inspection option, and lengthen the repetitive inspection intervals. This proposed AD results from reports of failures of the captain’s rudder pedal brackets before reaching the initial inspection threshold identified in the existing AD. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of the rudder pedal bracket assembly, which could result in the loss of rudder and braking control at either the captain’s or first officer’s position. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD. • DOT Docket Web site: Go to https:// dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–0024) for service information identified in this proposed AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5324; fax (562) 627–5210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:10 Aug 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 comments to an address listed in the section. Include the docket number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2007–29061; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–243– AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or may can visit https:// dms.dot.gov. ADDRESSES Examining the Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is located on the ground floor of the West Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System receives them. Discussion On March 31, 2006, we issued AD 2006–07–25, amendment 39–14552 (71 FR 18201, April 11, 2006), for certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8–33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC– 8–43 airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC–8F–55 airplanes; Model DC–8–50, –60, –60F, and –70 series airplanes; Model DC–9–10, –20, –30, –40, and –50 series airplanes; Model DC–9–81 (MD– 81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD– 83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes; and Model MD–88 airplanes. That AD requires an initial general visual or dye penetrant inspection, repetitive dye penetrant inspections, and replacement, as necessary, of the rudder pedal bracket. The existing AD also requires, for certain airplanes, replacing the rudder pedal bracket assemblies with new, improved parts, which would PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 50285 terminate the repetitive inspections. That AD resulted from a report of numerous cracked rudder pedal brackets found during inspections of certain affected airplanes. We issued that AD to prevent failure of the rudder pedal bracket assembly, which could result in the loss of rudder and braking control at either the captain’s or first officer’s position. Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued Since we issued AD 2006–07–25, two Model MD–80 operators have reported failures of the captain’s rudder pedal brackets before reaching the initial inspection threshold of 40,000 total landings specified in AD 2006–07–25. One operator reported finding a crack in the first officer’s rudder pedal bracket at 34,000 landings. Lab analysis of these parts verified that fatigue was the cause of the failure. Boeing re-evaluated the current inspection interval and determined that lowering the initial threshold to 25,000 total landings is necessary for operators of Model DC–9– 81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9– 83 (MD–83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes; and Model MD–88 airplanes. Boeing also determined that the general visual inspection for cracks is no longer necessary because the eddy current and dye penetrant inspections are adequate for Model DC–9–10, –20, –30, –40, and –50 series airplanes; Model DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9– 87 (MD–87) airplanes; and Model MD– 88 airplanes. In addition, Boeing has lengthened the repetitive inspection interval for the eddy current and any applicable dye penetrant inspection (also called ‘‘special detailed inspections’’) for these airplanes from intervals not to exceed 2,500 landings to intervals not to exceed 3,000 landings. Clarification of Applicability We have also clarified the applicability to include Model DC–8– 71F, DC–8–72F, and DC8–73F airplanes. These models were inadvertently omitted from Table 1, paragraph (c), ‘‘Applicability,’’ of AD 2006–07–25. However, these models were included in the effectivity of McDonnell Douglas DC–8 Alert Service Bulletin A27–273, dated May 16, 1989, which we referred to in AD 2006–07–25 as a source for identifying airplanes affected by that AD. Relevant Service Information We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–27A307, Revision 7, dated August 29, 2006. We referred to an earlier revision of this same service bulletin (McDonnell Douglas DC–9 Alert E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM 31AUP1 50286 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules Service Bulletin A27–307, Revision 6, dated December 19, 1994) as the appropriate source of service information for doing certain actions in AD 2006–07–25. The actions in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–27A307, Revision 7, are essentially the same as those in McDonnell Douglas DC–9 Alert Service Bulletin A27–307, Revision 6. However, Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9– 27A307, Revision 7, revises certain inspection thresholds and intervals. Revision 7 also removes a general visual inspection for certain airplanes and, instead, specifies a special detailed inspection. The special detailed inspection consists of either doing an eddy current inspection for cracking of the rudder pedal bracket assemblies and, if any crack is found, doing a penetrant inspection for cracking; or doing the penetrant inspection for cracking of the rudder pedal bracket assemblies. Revision 7 includes a definition of a special detailed inspection. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an unsafe condition that is likely to develop on other airplanes of the same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD, which would supersede AD 2006– 07–25 and would retain the requirements of the existing AD. This proposed AD would also, for certain airplanes, reduce certain initial inspection thresholds, remove an inspection option, and lengthen certain repetitive inspection intervals. Explanation of Changes to Existing AD We have changed the parts cost for the replacement to reflect the cost information in the current Boeing service information. We have revised this action to clarify the appropriate procedure for notifying the principal inspector before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies. We have revised references to certain service information to more accurately reflect the reference as cited on the service information itself. We have added a new paragraph (f) titled ‘‘Service Information and Airplane Categories’’ to reduce the length of the references to both in the AD itself. We have re-identified the paragraphs accordingly, and revised this action to refer to the airplane categories rather than list the models individually. We have also removed Note 2 of the existing AD because the new paragraph (f) makes the contents of the note unnecessary. Costs of Compliance There are about 1,840 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD. The replacements are applicable only to Model DC–9–10, –20, –30, –40, and –50 series airplanes; Model DC–9–81 (MD– 81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD– 83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes; and Model MD–88 airplanes. ESTIMATED COSTS Work hours Action General visual inspection (required by AD 2006–07– 25). Dye penetrant (special detailed) inspection (required by AD 2006–07– 25). Replacements (required by AD 2006–07–25). Average labor rate per hour yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS Number of U.S.-registered airplanes Fleet cost $80 None ........................ $240, per inspection cycle. 250 .......................... $60,000, per inspection cycle. 5 80 None ........................ $400, per inspection cycle. 946 .......................... $378,400, per inspection cycle. 9 80 $9,466 ..................... $10,186 ................... up to 946 ................. up to $9,635,956. Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 15:10 Aug 30, 2007 Cost per airplane 3 Authority for This Rulemaking VerDate Aug<31>2005 Parts Jkt 211001 that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM 31AUP1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules by removing amendment 39–14552 (71 FR 18201, April 11, 2006) and adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA–2007– 29061; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM– 243–AD. 2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 50287 Comments Due Date (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October 15, 2007. Affected ADs (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006–07–25. Applicability (c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in Table 1 of this AD, certificated in any category. TABLE 1.—APPLICABILITY McDonnell Douglas— As identified in— Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8–33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–8–43 airplanes; Model DC–8–51, DC–8–52, DC–8–53, and DC–8–55 airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC–8F–55 airplanes; Model DC–8–61, DC–8–62, and DC–8–63 airplanes; Model DC–8–61F, DC–8–62F, and DC–8–63F airplanes; Model DC–8–71, DC–8–72, and DC–8–73 airplanes; Model DC–8–71F, DC–8–72F, and DC–8–73F airplanes. Model DC–9–11, DC–9–12, DC–9–13, DC–9–14, DC–9–15, and DC–9–15F airplanes; Model DC–9–21 airplanes; Model DC–9–31, DC–9–32, DC–9–32 (VC–9C), DC–9–32F, DC–9–33F, DC–9–34, DC–9–34F, and DC–9–32F (C–9A, C–9B) airplanes; Model DC–9–41 airplanes; Model DC–9–51 airplanes; Model DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC– 9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes; and Model MD–88 airplanes. McDonnell Douglas DC–8 Alert Service Bulletin A27–273, Revision 5, dated February 18, 1993. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from reports of failures of the captain’s rudder pedal brackets before reaching the initial inspection threshold identified in AD 2006–07–25. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the rudder pedal bracket assembly, which could result in the loss of rudder and braking control at either the captain’s or first officer’s position. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–27A307, Revision 7, dated August 29, 2006. Service Information and Airplane Categories (f) The term ‘‘service bulletin,’’ as used in this AD, means the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin identified in Table 2 of this AD. The term ‘‘airplane category,’’ as used in this AD, means the category identified in Table 2 of this AD. TABLE 2.—SERVICE INFORMATION AND AIRPLANE CATEGORIES Called airplane category— For Model— (1) DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8–33, DC–8–41, DC– 8–42, and DC–8–43 airplanes; Model DC–8–51, DC–8–52, DC–8–53, and DC– 8–55 airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC–8F–55 airplanes; Model DC–8–61, DC–8–62, and DC–8–63 airplanes; Model DC–8–61F, DC–8–62F, and DC–8– 63F airplanes; Model DC–8–71, DC–8–72, and DC–8–73 airplanes. (2) DC–8–71F, DC–8–72F, and DC–8–73F airplanes ................................................ (3) DC–9–11, DC–9–12, DC–9–13, DC–9–14, DC–9–15, and DC–9–15F airplanes; Model DC–9–21 airplanes; Model DC–9–31, DC–9–32, DC–9–32 (VC–9C), DC– 9–32F, DC–9–33F, DC–9–34, DC–9–34F, and DC–9–32F (C–9A, C–9B) airplanes; Model DC–9–41 airplanes; Model DC–9–51 airplanes. 1 (4) DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes; and Model MD–88 airplanes. 4 Requirements of AD 2006–07–25 Initial Inspection Threshold yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS Use this service bulletin— (g) For airplane categories 1, 3, and 4, prior to the accumulation of 40,000 total landings or within 30 days after July 5, 1989 (the effective date of AD 89–14–02, amendment 39–6245, which was superseded by AD 2006–07–25), whichever occurs later: Perform either a general visual inspection, dye penetrant inspection, or special detailed inspection (eddy current with dye penetrant or just dye penetrant), as applicable, for cracking of the captain’s and first officer’s rudder pedal bracket, part numbers (P/N) 5616067 and 5616068, respectively, in VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:10 Aug 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 2 3 accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 2 of this AD. After the effective date of this AD, only the special detailed inspection specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–27A307, Revision 7, may be used for airplanes identified in Revision 7. For airplane category 4: Do the inspection required by this paragraph until the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD is accomplished. Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 McDonnell Douglas DC–8 Alert Service Bulletin A27–273, Revision 1, dated May 16, 1989; or Revision 5, dated February 18, 1993. McDonnell Douglas DC–9 Alert Service Bulletin A27–307, Revision 1, dated May 16, 1989; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–27A307, Revision 7, dated August 29, 2006 (after the effective date of this AD, only Revision 7 may be used). inspection is made from within touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked.’’ (1) If an initial general visual inspection is accomplished, and no crack is found, perform a dye penetrant inspection of the rudder pedal bracket assembly within 180 days after the general visual inspection, and E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM 31AUP1 50288 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules thereafter accomplish dye penetrant inspections at intervals not to exceed 12 months or 2,500 landings, whichever occurs earlier. For airplane categories 3 and 4, repeat at this interval until the inspection required by paragraph (k) of this AD is accomplished. (2) If an initial dye penetrant inspection is accomplished, and no crack is found, accomplish repetitive dye penetrant inspections at intervals not to exceed 12 months or 2,500 landings, whichever occurs earlier. For airplane categories 3 and 4, repeat at this interval until the inspection required by paragraph (k) of this AD is accomplished. (3) If an initial special detailed inspection is accomplished after the effective date of this AD, and no crack is found, repeat the inspection in accordance with paragraph (k) of this AD. Corrective Action (h) Except as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD: If any crack is detected during any inspection required by paragraph (g) or (j) of this AD, before further flight, remove and replace the rudder pedal bracket assembly in accordance with the service bulletin. Prior to the accumulation of 40,000 total landings after replacement with the new part, resume the repetitive inspections in accordance with paragraph (g) or (k) of this AD, as applicable. Doing the action required by paragraph (l) of this AD terminates the requirements of this paragraph for airplane category 4. Terminating Action for Certain Airplanes (i) For airplane categories 3 and 4: Do the actions in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. (1) Before the accumulation of 75,000 total landings on the captain’s rudder pedal bracket assembly, P/N 5616067–501, or within 60 months after May 16, 2006, whichever occurs later: Remove the rudder pedal bracket assembly and replace it with new, improved P/N 5962903–501. Accomplishment of the replacement terminates the repetitive inspections of the captain’s rudder pedal bracket assembly required by paragraphs (g), (h), (j), (k), and (l) of this AD. (2) Before the accumulation of 75,000 total landings on the first officer’s rudder pedal bracket assembly, P/N 5616068–501, or within 60 months after May 16, 2006, whichever occurs later: Remove the rudder pedal bracket assembly and replace it with new, improved P/N 5962904–501. Accomplishment of the replacement terminates the repetitive inspections of the first officer’s rudder pedal bracket assembly required by paragraphs (g), (h), (j), (k), and (l) of this AD. yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS New Requirements of This AD Revised Initial Inspection at Reduced Threshold for Certain Airplanes (j) For airplane categories 2 and 4, at the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2) or (j)(3) of this AD: Do a special detailed inspection for cracking of the captain’s and first officer’s rudder pedal bracket, part numbers (P/N) 5616067 and 5616068, respectively, in accordance with the service bulletin. Doing this inspection terminates the VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:10 Aug 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 inspection requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for airplane category 4. (1) For category 2 airplanes: Before the accumulation of 40,000 total landings or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. (2) For category 4 airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 25,000 total landings as of the effective date of this AD: Before the accumulation of 25,000 total landings, or within 3,000 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. (3) For category 4 airplanes that have accumulated 25,000 or more total landings as of the effective date of this AD, do the next inspection at the applicable time in paragraph (j)(3)(i) or (j)(3)(ii) of this AD. (i) For category 4 airplanes on which the corrective action specified in paragraph (h) of this AD has not been accomplished, do the inspection within 3,000 landings after the effective date of this AD. (ii) For category 4 airplanes on which the corrective action required by paragraph (h) of this AD has been accomplished, do the inspection at the earlier of the following: The next repetitive interval required by paragraph (h) of this AD; 40,000 total landings after doing the corrective action required by paragraph (h) of this AD; or 3,000 landings after the effective date of this AD. Repetitive Inspections at Revised Interval for Certain Airplanes (k) For airplane categories 3 and 4: Repeat the special detailed inspection required by paragraph (g) or (j) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,000 landings. Doing the first repetitive inspection required by this paragraph terminates the repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD for airplane categories 3 and 4. Corrective Action Including Reduced Inspection Threshold for Certain Airplanes (l) For airplane category 4: If any crack is detected during any inspection required by paragraph (g), (j), or (k) of this AD: Before further flight, remove and replace the rudder pedal bracket assembly in accordance with the service bulletin. Before the accumulation of 25,000 total landings after replacement with the new part, resume the repetitive inspections in accordance with paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing the action in this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD for airplane category 4. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (m)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (3) AMOCs, approved previously in accordance with AD 2006–07–25, amendment 39–14552; and AD 89–14–02, PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 amendment 39–6245; are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of this AD. Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2007. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E7–17287 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2007–29066; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–147–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC–8–102, –103, –106, –201, –202, –301, –311, and –315 Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: It has been discovered in several cases that clamp bolts of the elevator spring tab mechanism were not installed in the correct orientation. Bolts have been found installed with bolt heads on the lower position and in two cases, some bolts, nuts and washers [hardware] were found to be loose or missing. Detachment of an elevator spring tab mechanism clamp bolt could lead to jamming of the elevator control system and reduced controllability of the aircraft. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 1, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • DOT Docket Web Site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM 31AUP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 169 (Friday, August 31, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50284-50288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29061; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-243-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-11, DC-8-
12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 
Airplanes; Model DC-8F-54 and DC-8F-55 Airplanes; Model DC-8-50, -60, -
60F, -70, and -70F Series Airplanes; Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and 
-50 Series Airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 
(MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) Airplanes; and Model MD-88 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness 
directive (AD) that applies to certain McDonnell Douglas airplanes. The 
existing AD currently requires an initial

[[Page 50285]]

general visual or dye penetrant inspection, repetitive dye penetrant 
inspections, and replacement, as necessary, of the rudder pedal 
bracket. The existing AD also requires, for certain airplanes, 
replacing the rudder pedal bracket assemblies with new, improved parts, 
which would terminate the repetitive inspections. This proposed AD 
would, for certain airplanes, reduce initial inspection thresholds, 
remove an inspection option, and lengthen the repetitive inspection 
intervals. This proposed AD results from reports of failures of the 
captain's rudder pedal brackets before reaching the initial inspection 
threshold identified in the existing AD. We are proposing this AD to 
prevent failure of the rudder pedal bracket assembly, which could 
result in the loss of rudder and braking control at either the 
captain's or first officer's position.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 15, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on 
this proposed AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow 
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your 
comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the 
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and 
Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024) for service information 
identified in this proposed AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; 
telephone (562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or 
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``Docket No. 
FAA-2007-29061; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-243-AD'' at the 
beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the 
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the 
proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date 
and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will 
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA 
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of 
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our 
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or 
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, 
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the 
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or may 
can visit https://dms.dot.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The 
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located on the 
ground floor of the West Building at the street address stated in the 
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly 
after the Docket Management System receives them.

Discussion

    On March 31, 2006, we issued AD 2006-07-25, amendment 39-14552 (71 
FR 18201, April 11, 2006), for certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-11, 
DC-8-12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-
8-43 airplanes; Model DC-8F-54 and DC-8F-55 airplanes; Model DC-8-50, -
60, -60F, and -70 series airplanes; Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -
50 series airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 
(MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. That 
AD requires an initial general visual or dye penetrant inspection, 
repetitive dye penetrant inspections, and replacement, as necessary, of 
the rudder pedal bracket. The existing AD also requires, for certain 
airplanes, replacing the rudder pedal bracket assemblies with new, 
improved parts, which would terminate the repetitive inspections. That 
AD resulted from a report of numerous cracked rudder pedal brackets 
found during inspections of certain affected airplanes. We issued that 
AD to prevent failure of the rudder pedal bracket assembly, which could 
result in the loss of rudder and braking control at either the 
captain's or first officer's position.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2006-07-25, two Model MD-80 operators have 
reported failures of the captain's rudder pedal brackets before 
reaching the initial inspection threshold of 40,000 total landings 
specified in AD 2006-07-25. One operator reported finding a crack in 
the first officer's rudder pedal bracket at 34,000 landings. Lab 
analysis of these parts verified that fatigue was the cause of the 
failure. Boeing re-evaluated the current inspection interval and 
determined that lowering the initial threshold to 25,000 total landings 
is necessary for operators of Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), 
DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 
airplanes.
    Boeing also determined that the general visual inspection for 
cracks is no longer necessary because the eddy current and dye 
penetrant inspections are adequate for Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, 
and -50 series airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-
83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. 
In addition, Boeing has lengthened the repetitive inspection interval 
for the eddy current and any applicable dye penetrant inspection (also 
called ``special detailed inspections'') for these airplanes from 
intervals not to exceed 2,500 landings to intervals not to exceed 3,000 
landings.

Clarification of Applicability

    We have also clarified the applicability to include Model DC-8-71F, 
DC-8-72F, and DC8-73F airplanes. These models were inadvertently 
omitted from Table 1, paragraph (c), ``Applicability,'' of AD 2006-07-
25. However, these models were included in the effectivity of McDonnell 
Douglas DC-8 Alert Service Bulletin A27-273, dated May 16, 1989, which 
we referred to in AD 2006-07-25 as a source for identifying airplanes 
affected by that AD.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-27A307, Revision 
7, dated August 29, 2006. We referred to an earlier revision of this 
same service bulletin (McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Alert

[[Page 50286]]

Service Bulletin A27-307, Revision 6, dated December 19, 1994) as the 
appropriate source of service information for doing certain actions in 
AD 2006-07-25.
    The actions in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-27A307, Revision 
7, are essentially the same as those in McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Alert 
Service Bulletin A27-307, Revision 6. However, Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin DC9-27A307, Revision 7, revises certain inspection thresholds 
and intervals. Revision 7 also removes a general visual inspection for 
certain airplanes and, instead, specifies a special detailed 
inspection. The special detailed inspection consists of either doing an 
eddy current inspection for cracking of the rudder pedal bracket 
assemblies and, if any crack is found, doing a penetrant inspection for 
cracking; or doing the penetrant inspection for cracking of the rudder 
pedal bracket assemblies. Revision 7 includes a definition of a special 
detailed inspection.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an 
unsafe condition that is likely to develop on other airplanes of the 
same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD, which 
would supersede AD 2006-07-25 and would retain the requirements of the 
existing AD. This proposed AD would also, for certain airplanes, reduce 
certain initial inspection thresholds, remove an inspection option, and 
lengthen certain repetitive inspection intervals.

Explanation of Changes to Existing AD

    We have changed the parts cost for the replacement to reflect the 
cost information in the current Boeing service information.
    We have revised this action to clarify the appropriate procedure 
for notifying the principal inspector before using any approved AMOC on 
any airplane to which the AMOC applies.
    We have revised references to certain service information to more 
accurately reflect the reference as cited on the service information 
itself.
    We have added a new paragraph (f) titled ``Service Information and 
Airplane Categories'' to reduce the length of the references to both in 
the AD itself. We have re-identified the paragraphs accordingly, and 
revised this action to refer to the airplane categories rather than 
list the models individually. We have also removed Note 2 of the 
existing AD because the new paragraph (f) makes the contents of the 
note unnecessary.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 1,840 airplanes of the affected design in the 
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for 
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD. The replacements are 
applicable only to Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series 
airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and 
DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Work     Average labor                                                   Number of U.S.-
              Action                  hours     rate per hour          Parts            Cost per airplane     registered airplanes       Fleet cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General visual inspection                   3             $80  None.................  $240, per inspection   250..................  $60,000, per
 (required by AD 2006-07-25).                                                          cycle.                                        inspection cycle.
Dye penetrant (special detailed)            5              80  None.................  $400, per inspection   946..................  $378,400, per
 inspection (required by AD 2006-                                                      cycle.                                        inspection cycle.
 07-25).
Replacements (required by AD 2006-          9              80  $9,466...............  $10,186..............  up to 946............  up to $9,635,956.
 07-25).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the 
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

[[Page 50287]]

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by 
removing amendment 39-14552 (71 FR 18201, April 11, 2006) and adding 
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA-2007-29061; Directorate Identifier 
2006-NM-243-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October 
15, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-07-25.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in Table 1 of 
this AD, certificated in any category.

                         Table 1.--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               McDonnell Douglas--                  As identified in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model DC-8-11, DC-8-12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-   McDonnell Douglas DC-8
 32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43        Alert Service
 airplanes; Model DC-8-51, DC-8-52, DC-8-53, and   Bulletin A27-273,
 DC-8-55 airplanes; Model DC-8F-54 and DC-8F-55    Revision 5, dated
 airplanes; Model DC-8-61, DC-8-62, and DC-8-63    February 18, 1993.
 airplanes; Model DC-8-61F, DC-8-62F, and DC-8-
 63F airplanes; Model DC-8-71, DC-8-72, and DC-8-
 73 airplanes; Model DC-8-71F, DC-8-72F, and DC-
 8-73F airplanes.
Model DC-9-11, DC-9-12, DC-9-13, DC-9-14, DC-9-   Boeing Alert Service
 15, and DC-9-15F airplanes; Model DC-9-21         Bulletin DC9-27A307,
 airplanes; Model DC-9-31, DC-9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-   Revision 7, dated
 9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-33F, DC-9-34, DC-9-34F, and   August 29, 2006.
 DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B) airplanes; Model DC-9-41
 airplanes; Model DC-9-51 airplanes; Model DC-9-
 81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83),
 and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88
 airplanes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of failures of the captain's 
rudder pedal brackets before reaching the initial inspection 
threshold identified in AD 2006-07-25. We are issuing this AD to 
prevent failure of the rudder pedal bracket assembly, which could 
result in the loss of rudder and braking control at either the 
captain's or first officer's position.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Service Information and Airplane Categories

    (f) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in this AD, means the 
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin 
identified in Table 2 of this AD. The term ``airplane category,'' as 
used in this AD, means the category identified in Table 2 of this 
AD.

                              Table 2.--Service Information and Airplane Categories
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Called
                       For Model--                            airplane          Use this service bulletin--
                                                             category--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) DC-8-11, DC-8-12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33,               1  McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert Service
 DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 airplanes; Model DC-8-51,                    Bulletin A27-273, Revision 1, dated
 DC-8-52, DC-8-53, and DC-8-55 airplanes; Model DC-8F-54                    May 16, 1989; or Revision 5, dated
 and DC-8F-55 airplanes; Model DC-8-61, DC-8-62, and DC-8-                  February 18, 1993.
 63 airplanes; Model DC-8-61F, DC-8-62F, and DC-8-63F
 airplanes; Model DC-8-71, DC-8-72, and DC-8-73 airplanes.
(2) DC-8-71F, DC-8-72F, and DC-8-73F airplanes...........               2  .....................................
(3) DC-9-11, DC-9-12, DC-9-13, DC-9-14, DC-9-15, and DC-9-              3  McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Alert Service
 15F airplanes; Model DC-9-21 airplanes; Model DC-9-31,                     Bulletin A27-307, Revision 1, dated
 DC-9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-33F, DC-9-34,                     May 16, 1989; or Boeing Alert
 DC-9-34F, and DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B) airplanes; Model DC-                   Service Bulletin DC9-27A307,
 9-41 airplanes; Model DC-9-51 airplanes.                                   Revision 7, dated August 29, 2006
                                                                            (after the effective date of this
                                                                            AD, only Revision 7 may be used).
(4) DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83),                  4  .....................................
 and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Requirements of AD 2006-07-25

Initial Inspection Threshold

    (g) For airplane categories 1, 3, and 4, prior to the 
accumulation of 40,000 total landings or within 30 days after July 
5, 1989 (the effective date of AD 89-14-02, amendment 39-6245, which 
was superseded by AD 2006-07-25), whichever occurs later: Perform 
either a general visual inspection, dye penetrant inspection, or 
special detailed inspection (eddy current with dye penetrant or just 
dye penetrant), as applicable, for cracking of the captain's and 
first officer's rudder pedal bracket, part numbers (P/N) 5616067 and 
5616068, respectively, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 2 
of this AD. After the effective date of this AD, only the special 
detailed inspection specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-
27A307, Revision 7, may be used for airplanes identified in Revision 
7. For airplane category 4: Do the inspection required by this 
paragraph until the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD 
is accomplished.

    Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection 
is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, 
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or 
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching 
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to 
ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This 
level of inspection is made under normally available lighting 
conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or 
droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or 
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain 
proximity to the area being checked.''

    (1) If an initial general visual inspection is accomplished, and 
no crack is found, perform a dye penetrant inspection of the rudder 
pedal bracket assembly within 180 days after the general visual 
inspection, and

[[Page 50288]]

thereafter accomplish dye penetrant inspections at intervals not to 
exceed 12 months or 2,500 landings, whichever occurs earlier. For 
airplane categories 3 and 4, repeat at this interval until the 
inspection required by paragraph (k) of this AD is accomplished.
    (2) If an initial dye penetrant inspection is accomplished, and 
no crack is found, accomplish repetitive dye penetrant inspections 
at intervals not to exceed 12 months or 2,500 landings, whichever 
occurs earlier. For airplane categories 3 and 4, repeat at this 
interval until the inspection required by paragraph (k) of this AD 
is accomplished.
    (3) If an initial special detailed inspection is accomplished 
after the effective date of this AD, and no crack is found, repeat 
the inspection in accordance with paragraph (k) of this AD.

Corrective Action

    (h) Except as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD: If any crack 
is detected during any inspection required by paragraph (g) or (j) 
of this AD, before further flight, remove and replace the rudder 
pedal bracket assembly in accordance with the service bulletin. 
Prior to the accumulation of 40,000 total landings after replacement 
with the new part, resume the repetitive inspections in accordance 
with paragraph (g) or (k) of this AD, as applicable. Doing the 
action required by paragraph (l) of this AD terminates the 
requirements of this paragraph for airplane category 4.

Terminating Action for Certain Airplanes

    (i) For airplane categories 3 and 4: Do the actions in 
paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD in accordance with the 
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
    (1) Before the accumulation of 75,000 total landings on the 
captain's rudder pedal bracket assembly, P/N 5616067-501, or within 
60 months after May 16, 2006, whichever occurs later: Remove the 
rudder pedal bracket assembly and replace it with new, improved P/N 
5962903-501. Accomplishment of the replacement terminates the 
repetitive inspections of the captain's rudder pedal bracket 
assembly required by paragraphs (g), (h), (j), (k), and (l) of this 
AD.
    (2) Before the accumulation of 75,000 total landings on the 
first officer's rudder pedal bracket assembly, P/N 5616068-501, or 
within 60 months after May 16, 2006, whichever occurs later: Remove 
the rudder pedal bracket assembly and replace it with new, improved 
P/N 5962904-501. Accomplishment of the replacement terminates the 
repetitive inspections of the first officer's rudder pedal bracket 
assembly required by paragraphs (g), (h), (j), (k), and (l) of this 
AD.

New Requirements of This AD

Revised Initial Inspection at Reduced Threshold for Certain 
Airplanes

    (j) For airplane categories 2 and 4, at the applicable time 
specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2) or (j)(3) of this AD: Do a 
special detailed inspection for cracking of the captain's and first 
officer's rudder pedal bracket, part numbers (P/N) 5616067 and 
5616068, respectively, in accordance with the service bulletin. 
Doing this inspection terminates the inspection requirements of 
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for airplane category 4.
    (1) For category 2 airplanes: Before the accumulation of 40,000 
total landings or within 30 days after the effective date of this 
AD, whichever occurs later.
    (2) For category 4 airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 
25,000 total landings as of the effective date of this AD: Before 
the accumulation of 25,000 total landings, or within 3,000 landings 
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (3) For category 4 airplanes that have accumulated 25,000 or 
more total landings as of the effective date of this AD, do the next 
inspection at the applicable time in paragraph (j)(3)(i) or 
(j)(3)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) For category 4 airplanes on which the corrective action 
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD has not been accomplished, do 
the inspection within 3,000 landings after the effective date of 
this AD.
    (ii) For category 4 airplanes on which the corrective action 
required by paragraph (h) of this AD has been accomplished, do the 
inspection at the earlier of the following: The next repetitive 
interval required by paragraph (h) of this AD; 40,000 total landings 
after doing the corrective action required by paragraph (h) of this 
AD; or 3,000 landings after the effective date of this AD.

Repetitive Inspections at Revised Interval for Certain Airplanes

    (k) For airplane categories 3 and 4: Repeat the special detailed 
inspection required by paragraph (g) or (j) of this AD thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 3,000 landings. Doing the first repetitive 
inspection required by this paragraph terminates the repetitive 
inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD for airplane 
categories 3 and 4.

Corrective Action Including Reduced Inspection Threshold for 
Certain Airplanes

    (l) For airplane category 4: If any crack is detected during any 
inspection required by paragraph (g), (j), or (k) of this AD: Before 
further flight, remove and replace the rudder pedal bracket assembly 
in accordance with the service bulletin. Before the accumulation of 
25,000 total landings after replacement with the new part, resume 
the repetitive inspections in accordance with paragraph (k) of this 
AD. Doing the action in this paragraph terminates the requirements 
of paragraph (h) of this AD for airplane category 4.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (m)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve 
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures 
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different 
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. 
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA 
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 
FSDO.
    (3) AMOCs, approved previously in accordance with AD 2006-07-25, 
amendment 39-14552; and AD 89-14-02, amendment 39-6245; are approved 
as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of this AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-17287 Filed 8-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.