Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 50410-50411 [07-4287]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
50410
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Notices
Dated: August 23, 2007.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–17223 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–0002]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection,
Comments Requested
30-day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Supplementary Homicide Report.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice
Information Services Division (CJIS)
will be submitting the following
information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with established review
procedures of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The proposed information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. This proposed information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register, Volume 72,
Number 122, pages 35071–35072, on
June 26, 2007, allowing for a 60-day
comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment October 1, 2007. This process
is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Mr. Gregory E.
Scarbro, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E–
3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg,
West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304)
625–3566.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Comments
should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:43 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques of
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses. Overview of this information
collection:
(1) Type of information collection:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
(2) The title of the form/collection:
Supplementary Homicide Report.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Form 1–704; CJIS Division, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Department of
Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
federal and tribal law enforcement
agencies.
This report will gather data obtained
from law enforcement agencies in which
a criminal homicide, justifiable
homicide, and/or a manslaughter by
negligence has occurred.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There are approximately
17,523 law enforcement agency
respondents; calculated estimates
indicate 9 minutes per report.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with this
collection: There are approximately 31,
541 hours, annual burden, associated
with this information collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, Information
Management and Security Staff, Justice
Management Division, United States
Department of Justice, Patrick Henry
Building, Suite 1600, 601 D. Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United
States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E7–17275 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request reinstatement and clearance
of this collection. In accordance with
the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
we are providing opportunity for public
comment on this action. After obtaining
and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting
OMB clearance of this collection for no
longer than 3 years.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by October 1, 2007 to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292–7556 or
send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Recurring Study of
National Science Foundation-sponsored
Graduate Education Impacts or Legacy
(GEIL). (Formerly called the Evaluation
of the Initial Impacts of the Integrative
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Notices
Graduate Education Research and
Traineeship (IGERT) Program.)
OMB Control No.: 3145–0182.
Expiration Date of Approval: July 31,
2005.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Abstract
The National Science Foundation
(NSF) requests extension of data
collection (e.g., interviews, surveys,
focus groups, site visits) measuring
NSF’s contribution to the Nation’s
graduate education enterprise and
overall science and engineering
workforce. This continuation expands
the data collection formerly called ‘‘The
Evaluation of the Initial Impacts of the
IGERT Program’’ most recently
approved through July 2005 (OMB
3145–0182).
IGERT began data collection in the
late 1990s for use in program research,
management and evaluation. Data
collection was concurrent with NSFfunding in order to document IGERT’s
initial impact within individual
departments or institutions (often called
projects), and on student, faculty and
other participants as compared to the
educational and training experiences of
individuals who were external to
IGERT. This request expands data
collection to the portfolio of NSFfunded graduate education programs
and projects, typically on a program-byprogram sub-study basis in order to
address long-term impact.
For over fifty years NSF has funded
directly and indirectly (e.g. via
institutions), tens of thousands of
individuals who pursue postundergraduate education or research
training. NSF’s graduate education
portfolio includes:
• The Integrative Graduate Education
Research and Traineeship (IGERT)
program. IGERT provides grants to
institutions to recruit and support
doctoral students in interdisciplinary
Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics programs (STEM).
• The graduate Teaching Fellows in
K–12 Education (GK–12) program. GK–
12 provides grants to institutions to
support STEM graduate students’
acquisition of skills that will prepare
them for careers in the 21st century.
• The Graduate Research Fellowship
(GRF) program. GRF provides three
years of funding to eligible individuals
for graduate study leading to researchbased masters or doctoral degrees at an
IHE of their choice.
A longer list of NSF’s graduate
education opportunities and eligibility
information is on the NSF Web site
under the link: ‘‘Specialized
information for Graduate Students’’ at:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:43 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
https://www.nsf.gov/funding/education/
jsp?org=NSF@fund_type-2.
Through longitudinal study NSF aims
to learn about the long-term impact or
legacy of its program strategies in
graduate education. A primary goal is to
identify and follow-up with individuals
who participated in NSF-funded
programs or projects, especially
students who graduated with masters or
doctoral degrees. The primary means of
data collection will be surveys. Site
visits, focus groups and interviews are
used to improve survey instruments,
clarify responses or address questions of
institutional impact. Typical
respondents are former NSF-funded
fellows, trainees or to her participants in
NSF-funded projects or are professional
scientists, engineers, IHE faculty, Kgraduate educators, education
administrators and K-IHE policymakers.
NSF uses the analysis of responses to
prepare and publish reports and to
respond to requests from Committees of
Visitors, Congress and the Office of
Management and Budget, particularly as
related to the Government Performance
and Results Act (GPRA) and the
Program Assessment Rating Tool
(PART).
The study’s broad questions include
but are not limited to: What do
individuals following post-participation
in IGERT or other NSF-funded graduate
education opportunities do? Do IGERT
or other NSF-funded opportunities
provide graduates with the professional
and/or research skills needed to work in
science and engineering? Are IGERT or
other NSF-sponsored graduates satisfied
that their NSF-funded graduate
education advanced their careers in
science or engineering? To what extent
do IGERT or other former-NSFsponsored graduates engage in the
science and engineering workforce
conduct inter- or multi-disciplinary
science? Is there evidence of a legacy
from NSF-funding that changed a
degree-granting department beyond
number of students supported and
degrees awarded? To what extent have
projects achieved or contributed to
individual project goals or the NSF
program goals? To what extent have
NSF-funded projects or programs
broadened participation by diverse
individuals, particularly individuals
traditionally underemployed in science
or engineering, including but not
limited to women, minorities, and
persons-with-disabilities?
Respondents: Individuals or
households, not-for-profit institutions,
business or other for profit, and Federal,
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 30,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50411
Burden on the Public: 15,000 hours.
This estimate covers three graduate
education programs, their participants,
and comparison group respondents over
a three year period.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 07–4287 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permit Applications Received
Under the Antarctic Conservation Act
of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541)
National Science Foundation.
Notice of Permit Applications
Received under the Antarctic
Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law
95–541.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permit applications received to
conduct activities regulated under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
NSF has published regulations under
the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title
45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This is the required notice
of permit applications received.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit written data, comments, or
views with respect to this permit
application by October 1, 2007. This
application may be inspected by
interested parties at the Permit Office,
address below.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to Permit Office, Room 755,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadene G. Kennedy at the above
address or (703) 292–7405.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Science Foundation, as
directed by the Antarctic Conservation
Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541), as
amended by the Antarctic Science,
Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996,
has developed regulations for the
establishment of a permit system for
various activities in Antarctica and
designation of certain animals and
certain geographic areas as requiring
special protection. The regulations
establish such a permit system to
designate Antarctic Specially Protected
Areas.
The applications received are as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 169 (Friday, August 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50410-50411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4287]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to
request reinstatement and clearance of this collection. In accordance
with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing opportunity for public comment
on this action. After obtaining and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting OMB clearance of this collection
for no longer than 3 years.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Written comments should be received by October 1, 2007 to be
assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed information collection request
should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 295, Arlington, VA
22230, or by e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292-7556 or
send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Recurring Study of National Science
Foundation-sponsored Graduate Education Impacts or Legacy (GEIL).
(Formerly called the Evaluation of the Initial Impacts of the
Integrative
[[Page 50411]]
Graduate Education Research and Traineeship (IGERT) Program.)
OMB Control No.: 3145-0182.
Expiration Date of Approval: July 31, 2005.
Abstract
The National Science Foundation (NSF) requests extension of data
collection (e.g., interviews, surveys, focus groups, site visits)
measuring NSF's contribution to the Nation's graduate education
enterprise and overall science and engineering workforce. This
continuation expands the data collection formerly called ``The
Evaluation of the Initial Impacts of the IGERT Program'' most recently
approved through July 2005 (OMB 3145-0182).
IGERT began data collection in the late 1990s for use in program
research, management and evaluation. Data collection was concurrent
with NSF-funding in order to document IGERT's initial impact within
individual departments or institutions (often called projects), and on
student, faculty and other participants as compared to the educational
and training experiences of individuals who were external to IGERT.
This request expands data collection to the portfolio of NSF-funded
graduate education programs and projects, typically on a program-by-
program sub-study basis in order to address long-term impact.
For over fifty years NSF has funded directly and indirectly (e.g.
via institutions), tens of thousands of individuals who pursue post-
undergraduate education or research training. NSF's graduate education
portfolio includes:
The Integrative Graduate Education Research and
Traineeship (IGERT) program. IGERT provides grants to institutions to
recruit and support doctoral students in interdisciplinary Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics programs (STEM).
The graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12)
program. GK-12 provides grants to institutions to support STEM graduate
students' acquisition of skills that will prepare them for careers in
the 21st century.
The Graduate Research Fellowship (GRF) program. GRF
provides three years of funding to eligible individuals for graduate
study leading to research-based masters or doctoral degrees at an IHE
of their choice.
A longer list of NSF's graduate education opportunities and
eligibility information is on the NSF Web site under the link:
``Specialized information for Graduate Students'' at: https://
www.nsf.gov/funding/education/jsp?org=NSF@fund--type-2.
Through longitudinal study NSF aims to learn about the long-term
impact or legacy of its program strategies in graduate education. A
primary goal is to identify and follow-up with individuals who
participated in NSF-funded programs or projects, especially students
who graduated with masters or doctoral degrees. The primary means of
data collection will be surveys. Site visits, focus groups and
interviews are used to improve survey instruments, clarify responses or
address questions of institutional impact. Typical respondents are
former NSF-funded fellows, trainees or to her participants in NSF-
funded projects or are professional scientists, engineers, IHE faculty,
K-graduate educators, education administrators and K-IHE policymakers.
NSF uses the analysis of responses to prepare and publish reports and
to respond to requests from Committees of Visitors, Congress and the
Office of Management and Budget, particularly as related to the
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and the Program
Assessment Rating Tool (PART).
The study's broad questions include but are not limited to: What do
individuals following post-participation in IGERT or other NSF-funded
graduate education opportunities do? Do IGERT or other NSF-funded
opportunities provide graduates with the professional and/or research
skills needed to work in science and engineering? Are IGERT or other
NSF-sponsored graduates satisfied that their NSF-funded graduate
education advanced their careers in science or engineering? To what
extent do IGERT or other former-NSF-sponsored graduates engage in the
science and engineering workforce conduct inter- or multi-disciplinary
science? Is there evidence of a legacy from NSF-funding that changed a
degree-granting department beyond number of students supported and
degrees awarded? To what extent have projects achieved or contributed
to individual project goals or the NSF program goals? To what extent
have NSF-funded projects or programs broadened participation by diverse
individuals, particularly individuals traditionally underemployed in
science or engineering, including but not limited to women, minorities,
and persons-with-disabilities?
Respondents: Individuals or households, not-for-profit
institutions, business or other for profit, and Federal, State, Local
or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 30,000.
Burden on the Public: 15,000 hours. This estimate covers three
graduate education programs, their participants, and comparison group
respondents over a three year period.
Dated: August 27, 2007.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 07-4287 Filed 8-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
