Migratory Bird Hunting; Early Seasons and Bag and Possession Limits for Certain Migratory Game Birds in the Contiguous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, 50164-50199 [07-4255]
Download as PDF
50164
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 20
RIN 1018–AV12
Migratory Bird Hunting; Early Seasons
and Bag and Possession Limits for
Certain Migratory Game Birds in the
Contiguous United States, Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
SUMMARY: This rule prescribes the
hunting seasons, hours, areas, and daily
bag and possession limits of mourning,
white-winged, and white-tipped doves;
band-tailed pigeons; rails; moorhens
and gallinules; woodcock; common
snipe; sandhill cranes; sea ducks; early
(September) waterfowl seasons;
migratory game birds in Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands; and
some extended falconry seasons. Taking
of migratory birds is prohibited unless
specifically provided for by annual
regulations. This rule permits taking of
designated species during the 2007–08
season.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may inspect comments
received on the migratory bird hunting
regulations during normal business
hours at the Service’s office in room
4107, Arlington Square Building, 4501
N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.
You may obtain copies of referenced
reports from the address above or from
the Division of Migratory Bird
Management’s Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/reports/
reports.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Blohm, Chief, or Ron W. Kokel,
Division of Migratory Bird Management,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (703)
358–1714.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations Schedule for 2007
On April 11, 2007, we published in
the Federal Register (72 FR 18328) a
proposal to amend 50 CFR part 20. The
proposal provided a background and
overview of the migratory bird hunting
regulations process, and dealt with the
establishment of seasons, limits,
proposed regulatory alternatives for the
2007–08 duck hunting season, and other
regulations for hunting migratory game
birds under §§ 20.101 through 20.107,
20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K. Major
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
steps in the 2007–08 regulatory cycle
relating to open public meetings and
Federal Register notifications were also
identified in the April 11 proposed rule.
On June 8, 2007, we published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 31789) a second
document providing supplemental
proposals for early- and late-season
migratory bird hunting regulations and
the regulatory alternatives for the 2007–
08 duck hunting season. The June 8
supplement also provided detailed
information on the 2007–08 regulatory
schedule and announced the Service
Migratory Bird Regulations Committee
(SRC) and Flyway Council meetings.
On June 20 and 21, 2007, we held
open meetings with the Flyway Council
Consultants at which the participants
reviewed information on the current
status of migratory shore and upland
game birds and developed
recommendations for the 2007–08
regulations for these species plus
regulations for migratory game birds in
Alaska, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands, special September waterfowl
seasons in designated States, special sea
duck seasons in the Atlantic Flyway,
and extended falconry seasons. In
addition, we reviewed and discussed
preliminary information on the status of
waterfowl as it relates to the
development and selection of the
regulatory packages for the 2007–08
regular waterfowl seasons. On July 23,
2007, we published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 40194) a third document
specifically dealing with the proposed
frameworks for early-season regulations.
On August 28, 2007, we published a
fourth document in the Federal Register
which contained final frameworks for
early migratory bird hunting seasons
from which wildlife conservation
agency officials from the States, Puerto
Rico, and the Virgin Islands selected
early-season hunting dates, hours, areas,
and limits.
On August 1–2, 2007, we held open
meetings with the Flyway Council
Consultants at which the participants
reviewed the status of waterfowl and
developed recommendations for the
2007–08 regulations for these species.
Proposed hunting regulations were
discussed for late seasons. We
published proposed frameworks for the
2007–08 late-season migratory bird
hunting regulations in a late August
2007 Federal Register.
The final rule described here is the
sixth in the series of proposed,
supplemental, and final rulemaking
documents for migratory game bird
hunting regulations and deals
specifically with amending subpart K of
50 CFR part 20. It sets hunting seasons,
hours, areas, and limits for mourning,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
white-winged, and white-tipped doves;
band-tailed pigeons; rails; moorhens
and gallinules; woodcock; common
snipe; sandhill cranes; sea ducks; early
(September) waterfowl seasons;
mourning doves in Hawaii; migratory
game birds in Alaska, Puerto Rico, and
the Virgin Islands; youth waterfowl
hunting day; and some extended
falconry seasons.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consideration
NEPA considerations are covered by
the programmatic document ‘‘Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement: Issuance of Annual
Regulations Permitting the Sport
Hunting of Migratory Birds (FSES 88–
14),’’ filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency on June 9, 1988. We
published a notice of availability in the
Federal Register on June 16, 1988 (53
FR 22582). We published our Record of
Decision on August 18, 1988 (53 FR
31341). Annual NEPA considerations
are covered under a separate
Environmental Assessment (EA), ‘‘Duck
Hunting Regulations for 2007–08,’’ and
an August 2007, Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI). Copies of
the EA and FONSI are available upon
request from the address indicated
under ADDRESSES.
In a notice published in the
September 8, 2005, Federal Register (70
FR 53376), we announced our intent to
develop a new Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for the
migratory bird hunting program. Public
scoping meetings were held in the
spring of 2006, as detailed in a March
9, 2006, Federal Register (71 FR 12216).
A scoping report summarizing the
scoping comments and scoping
meetings is available either at the
address indicated under ADDRESSES or
on our Web site at https://www.fws.gov/
migratorybirds.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531–1543;
87 Stat. 884), provides that, ‘‘The
Secretary shall review other programs
administered by him and utilize such
programs in furtherance of the purposes
of this Act’’ (and) shall ‘‘insure that any
action authorized, funded, or carried out
* * * is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered
species or threatened species or result in
the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat * * *.’’
Consequently, we conducted formal
consultations to ensure that actions
resulting from these regulations would
not likely jeopardize the continued
existence of endangered or threatened
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of their critical
habitat. Findings from these
consultations are included in a
biological opinion, which concluded
that the regulations are not likely to
adversely affect any endangered or
threatened species. Additionally, these
findings may have caused modification
of some regulatory measures previously
proposed, and the final frameworks
reflect any such modifications. Our
biological opinions resulting from this
Section 7 consultation are public
documents available for public
inspection at the address indicated
under ADDRESSES.
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Executive Order 12866
The migratory bird hunting
regulations are economically significant
and were reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
Executive Order 12866. As such, a cost/
benefit analysis was initially prepared
in 1981. This analysis was subsequently
revised annually from 1990–96, updated
in 1998, and updated again in 2004. It
is further discussed under the heading
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Results from
the 2004 analysis indicate that the
expected welfare benefit of the annual
migratory bird hunting frameworks is on
the order of $734 to $1,064 million, with
a mid-point estimate of $899 million.
Copies of the cost/benefit analysis are
available upon request from the address
indicated under ADDRESSES or from our
Web site at https://
www.migratorybirds.gov.
This year, due to limited data
availability, we partially updated the
2004 analysis, but restricted our
analysis to duck hunting. Results
indicate that the total consumer surplus
of the annual duck hunting frameworks
is on the order of $222 to $360 million,
with a mid-point estimate of $291
million. We plan to perform a full
update of the analysis in 2008. Copies
of the updated analysis are available
upon request from the address indicated
under ADDRESSES or from our Web site
at https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/
reports/SpecialTopics/
EconomicAnalysis-2007Update.pdf.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
These regulations have a significant
economic impact on substantial
numbers of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). We analyzed the economic
impacts of the annual hunting
regulations on small business entities in
detail as part of the 1981 cost-benefit
analysis discussed under Executive
Order 12866. This analysis was revised
annually from 1990–95. In 1995, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
50165
Service issued a Small Entity Flexibility
Analysis (Analysis), which was
subsequently updated in 1996, 1998,
and 2004. The primary source of
information about hunter expenditures
for migratory game bird hunting is the
National Hunting and Fishing Survey,
which is conducted at 5-year intervals.
The 2004 Analysis was based on the
2001 National Hunting and Fishing
Survey and the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s County Business Patterns,
from which it was estimated that
migratory bird hunters would spend
between $481 million and $1.2 billion at
small businesses in 2004. Copies of the
Analysis are available upon request
from the address indicated under
ADDRESSES or from our Web site at
https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds.
This year, due to limited data
availability, we partially updated the
2004 analysis, but restricted our
analysis to duck hunting. Results
indicate that the duck hunters would
spend between $291 million and $473.5
million at small businesses in 2007. We
plan to perform a full update of the
analysis in 2008 when the full results
from the 2006 National Hunting and
Fishing Survey is available. Copies of
the updated analysis are available upon
request from the address indicated
under ADDRESSES or from our Web site
at https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/
reports/SpecialTopics/
EconomicAnalysis-2007Update.pdf.
estimates for all migratory game birds in
order to better manage these
populations. OMB has also approved
the information collection requirements
of the Sandhill Crane Harvest Survey
and assigned clearance number 1018–
0023 (expires 11/30/2007). The
information from this survey is used to
estimate the magnitude and the
geographical and temporal distribution
of the harvest, and the portion it
constitutes of the total population.
A Federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
For the reasons outlined above, this rule
has an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more. However, because
it establishes hunting seasons, we do
not plan to defer the effective date
required by 5 U.S.C. 801 under the
exemption contained in 5 U.S.C. 808(1).
Takings Implication Assessment
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, this rule, authorized by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not
have significant takings implications
and does not affect any constitutionally
protected property rights. This rule will
not result in the physical occupancy of
property, the physical invasion of
property, or the regulatory taking of any
property. In fact, these rules allow
hunters to exercise otherwise
unavailable privileges and, therefore,
reduce restrictions on the use of private
and public property.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined these regulations under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The various
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements imposed under regulations
established in 50 CFR part 20, subpart
K, are utilized in the formulation of
migratory game bird hunting
regulations. Specifically, OMB has
approved the information collection
requirements of the surveys associated
with the Migratory Bird Harvest
Information Program and assigned
clearance number 1018–0015 (expires
2/29/2008). This information is used to
provide a sampling frame for voluntary
national surveys to improve our harvest
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certify, in
compliance with the requirements of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2
U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this rulemaking
will not impose a cost of $100 million
or more in any given year on local or
State government or private entities.
Therefore, this rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act.
Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order
12988
In promulgating this rule, we have
determined that it will not unduly
burden the judicial system and that it
meets the requirements of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Energy Effects—Executive Order 13211
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. Executive Order
13211 requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. While this
rule is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, it is not
expected to adversely affect energy
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy
action and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50166
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
Due to the migratory nature of certain
species of birds, the Federal
Government has been given
responsibility over these species by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Thus, in
accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), Executive
Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
evaluated possible effects on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have
determined that there are no effects on
Indian trust resources. However, in the
April 11 proposed rule (72 FR 18328)
we solicited proposals for special
migratory bird hunting regulations for
certain Tribes on Federal Indian
reservations, off-reservation trust lands,
and ceded lands for the 2007–08
migratory bird hunting season. The
resulting proposals will be contained in
a separate proposed rule. By virtue of
these actions, we have consulted with
all the Tribes affected by this rule.
Federalism Effects
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Due to the migratory nature of certain
species of birds, the Federal
Government has been given
responsibility over these species by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually
prescribe frameworks from which the
States make selections regarding the
hunting of migratory birds, and we
employ guidelines to establish special
regulations on Federal Indian
reservations and ceded lands. This
process preserves the ability of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
States and tribes to determine which
seasons meet their individual needs.
Any State or tribe may be more
restrictive than the Federal frameworks
at any time. The frameworks are
developed in a cooperative process with
the States and the Flyway Councils.
This process allows States to participate
in the development of frameworks from
which they will make selections,
thereby having an influence on their
own regulations. These rules do not
have a substantial direct effect on fiscal
capacity, change the roles or
responsibilities of Federal or State
governments, or intrude on State policy
or administration. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
these regulations do not have significant
federalism effects and do not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulations Promulgation
The rulemaking process for migratory
game bird hunting must, by its nature,
operate under severe time constraints.
However, we intend that the public be
given the greatest possible opportunity
to comment. Thus, when the
preliminary proposed rulemaking was
published, we established what we
believed were the longest periods
possible for public comment. In doing
this, we recognized that when the
comment period closed, time would be
of the essence. That is, if there were a
delay in the effective date of these
regulations after this final rulemaking,
States would have insufficient time to
select season dates and limits, to
communicate those selections to us, and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to establish and publicize the necessary
regulations and procedures to
implement their decisions. We therefore
find that ‘‘good cause’’ exists, within the
terms of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) of the
Administrative Procedure Act, and
these regulations will, therefore, take
effect immediately upon publication.
Accordingly, with each conservation
agency having had an opportunity to
participate in selecting the hunting
seasons desired for its State or Territory
on those species of migratory birds for
which open seasons are now prescribed,
and consideration having been given to
all other relevant matters presented,
certain sections of title 50, chapter I,
subchapter B, part 20, subpart K, are
hereby amended as set forth below.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation, Wildlife.
Dated: August 22, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 50, chapter I, subchapter
B, part 20, subpart K of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 20—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 20
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712 and 16
U.S.C. 742 a–j, Pub. L. 106–108.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50167
ER30AU07.000
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.001
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50168
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50169
ER30AU07.002
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.003
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50170
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50171
ER30AU07.004
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.005
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50172
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50173
ER30AU07.006
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.007
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50174
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50175
ER30AU07.008
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.009
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50176
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50177
ER30AU07.010
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.011
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50178
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50179
ER30AU07.012
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.013
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50180
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50181
ER30AU07.014
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.015
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50182
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50183
ER30AU07.016
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.017
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50184
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50185
ER30AU07.018
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.019
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50186
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50187
ER30AU07.020
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.021
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50188
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50189
ER30AU07.022
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.023
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50190
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50191
ER30AU07.024
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.025
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50192
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50193
ER30AU07.026
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.027
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50194
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50195
ER30AU07.028
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.029
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50196
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
50197
ER30AU07.030
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.031
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
50198
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
50199
[FR Doc. 07–4255 Filed 8–29–07; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:13 Aug 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM
30AUR2
ER30AU07.032
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
BILLING CODE 4310–55–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 168 (Thursday, August 30, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50164-50199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4255]
[[Page 50163]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 20
Migratory Bird Hunting; Early Seasons and Bag and Possession Limits for
Certain Migratory Game Birds in the Contiguous United States, Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 168 / Thursday, August 30, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 50164]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 20
RIN 1018-AV12
Migratory Bird Hunting; Early Seasons and Bag and Possession
Limits for Certain Migratory Game Birds in the Contiguous United
States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule prescribes the hunting seasons, hours, areas, and
daily bag and possession limits of mourning, white-winged, and white-
tipped doves; band-tailed pigeons; rails; moorhens and gallinules;
woodcock; common snipe; sandhill cranes; sea ducks; early (September)
waterfowl seasons; migratory game birds in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands; and some extended falconry seasons. Taking of
migratory birds is prohibited unless specifically provided for by
annual regulations. This rule permits taking of designated species
during the 2007-08 season.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may inspect comments received on the migratory bird
hunting regulations during normal business hours at the Service's
office in room 4107, Arlington Square Building, 4501 N. Fairfax Drive,
Arlington, Virginia. You may obtain copies of referenced reports from
the address above or from the Division of Migratory Bird Management's
Web site at https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/reports/reports.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Blohm, Chief, or Ron W. Kokel,
Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
(703) 358-1714.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations Schedule for 2007
On April 11, 2007, we published in the Federal Register (72 FR
18328) a proposal to amend 50 CFR part 20. The proposal provided a
background and overview of the migratory bird hunting regulations
process, and dealt with the establishment of seasons, limits, proposed
regulatory alternatives for the 2007-08 duck hunting season, and other
regulations for hunting migratory game birds under Sec. Sec. 20.101
through 20.107, 20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K. Major steps in the
2007-08 regulatory cycle relating to open public meetings and Federal
Register notifications were also identified in the April 11 proposed
rule. On June 8, 2007, we published in the Federal Register (72 FR
31789) a second document providing supplemental proposals for early-
and late-season migratory bird hunting regulations and the regulatory
alternatives for the 2007-08 duck hunting season. The June 8 supplement
also provided detailed information on the 2007-08 regulatory schedule
and announced the Service Migratory Bird Regulations Committee (SRC)
and Flyway Council meetings.
On June 20 and 21, 2007, we held open meetings with the Flyway
Council Consultants at which the participants reviewed information on
the current status of migratory shore and upland game birds and
developed recommendations for the 2007-08 regulations for these species
plus regulations for migratory game birds in Alaska, Puerto Rico, and
the Virgin Islands, special September waterfowl seasons in designated
States, special sea duck seasons in the Atlantic Flyway, and extended
falconry seasons. In addition, we reviewed and discussed preliminary
information on the status of waterfowl as it relates to the development
and selection of the regulatory packages for the 2007-08 regular
waterfowl seasons. On July 23, 2007, we published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 40194) a third document specifically dealing with the
proposed frameworks for early-season regulations. On August 28, 2007,
we published a fourth document in the Federal Register which contained
final frameworks for early migratory bird hunting seasons from which
wildlife conservation agency officials from the States, Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands selected early-season hunting dates, hours,
areas, and limits.
On August 1-2, 2007, we held open meetings with the Flyway Council
Consultants at which the participants reviewed the status of waterfowl
and developed recommendations for the 2007-08 regulations for these
species. Proposed hunting regulations were discussed for late seasons.
We published proposed frameworks for the 2007-08 late-season migratory
bird hunting regulations in a late August 2007 Federal Register.
The final rule described here is the sixth in the series of
proposed, supplemental, and final rulemaking documents for migratory
game bird hunting regulations and deals specifically with amending
subpart K of 50 CFR part 20. It sets hunting seasons, hours, areas, and
limits for mourning, white-winged, and white-tipped doves; band-tailed
pigeons; rails; moorhens and gallinules; woodcock; common snipe;
sandhill cranes; sea ducks; early (September) waterfowl seasons;
mourning doves in Hawaii; migratory game birds in Alaska, Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands; youth waterfowl hunting day; and some extended
falconry seasons.
National Environmental Policy Act Consideration
NEPA considerations are covered by the programmatic document
``Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Issuance of Annual
Regulations Permitting the Sport Hunting of Migratory Birds (FSES 88-
14),'' filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on June 9, 1988.
We published a notice of availability in the Federal Register on June
16, 1988 (53 FR 22582). We published our Record of Decision on August
18, 1988 (53 FR 31341). Annual NEPA considerations are covered under a
separate Environmental Assessment (EA), ``Duck Hunting Regulations for
2007-08,'' and an August 2007, Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI). Copies of the EA and FONSI are available upon request from the
address indicated under ADDRESSES.
In a notice published in the September 8, 2005, Federal Register
(70 FR 53376), we announced our intent to develop a new Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for the migratory bird hunting program.
Public scoping meetings were held in the spring of 2006, as detailed in
a March 9, 2006, Federal Register (71 FR 12216). A scoping report
summarizing the scoping comments and scoping meetings is available
either at the address indicated under ADDRESSES or on our Web site at
https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543; 87 Stat. 884), provides that, ``The Secretary shall review
other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in
furtherance of the purposes of this Act'' (and) shall ``insure that any
action authorized, funded, or carried out * * * is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat * * *.'' Consequently, we conducted formal
consultations to ensure that actions resulting from these regulations
would not likely jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or
threatened
[[Page 50165]]
species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their
critical habitat. Findings from these consultations are included in a
biological opinion, which concluded that the regulations are not likely
to adversely affect any endangered or threatened species. Additionally,
these findings may have caused modification of some regulatory measures
previously proposed, and the final frameworks reflect any such
modifications. Our biological opinions resulting from this Section 7
consultation are public documents available for public inspection at
the address indicated under ADDRESSES.
Executive Order 12866
The migratory bird hunting regulations are economically significant
and were reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
Executive Order 12866. As such, a cost/benefit analysis was initially
prepared in 1981. This analysis was subsequently revised annually from
1990-96, updated in 1998, and updated again in 2004. It is further
discussed under the heading Regulatory Flexibility Act. Results from
the 2004 analysis indicate that the expected welfare benefit of the
annual migratory bird hunting frameworks is on the order of $734 to
$1,064 million, with a mid-point estimate of $899 million. Copies of
the cost/benefit analysis are available upon request from the address
indicated under ADDRESSES or from our Web site at https://
www.migratorybirds.gov.
This year, due to limited data availability, we partially updated
the 2004 analysis, but restricted our analysis to duck hunting. Results
indicate that the total consumer surplus of the annual duck hunting
frameworks is on the order of $222 to $360 million, with a mid-point
estimate of $291 million. We plan to perform a full update of the
analysis in 2008. Copies of the updated analysis are available upon
request from the address indicated under ADDRESSES or from our Web site
at https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/reports/SpecialTopics/
EconomicAnalysis-2007Update.pdf.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
These regulations have a significant economic impact on substantial
numbers of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). We analyzed the economic impacts of the annual
hunting regulations on small business entities in detail as part of the
1981 cost-benefit analysis discussed under Executive Order 12866. This
analysis was revised annually from 1990-95. In 1995, the Service issued
a Small Entity Flexibility Analysis (Analysis), which was subsequently
updated in 1996, 1998, and 2004. The primary source of information
about hunter expenditures for migratory game bird hunting is the
National Hunting and Fishing Survey, which is conducted at 5-year
intervals. The 2004 Analysis was based on the 2001 National Hunting and
Fishing Survey and the U.S. Department of Commerce's County Business
Patterns, from which it was estimated that migratory bird hunters would
spend between $481 million and $1.2 billion at small businesses in
2004. Copies of the Analysis are available upon request from the
address indicated under ADDRESSES or from our Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds.
This year, due to limited data availability, we partially updated
the 2004 analysis, but restricted our analysis to duck hunting. Results
indicate that the duck hunters would spend between $291 million and
$473.5 million at small businesses in 2007. We plan to perform a full
update of the analysis in 2008 when the full results from the 2006
National Hunting and Fishing Survey is available. Copies of the updated
analysis are available upon request from the address indicated under
ADDRESSES or from our Web site at https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/
reports/SpecialTopics/EconomicAnalysis-2007Update.pdf.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined above,
this rule has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
However, because it establishes hunting seasons, we do not plan to
defer the effective date required by 5 U.S.C. 801 under the exemption
contained in 5 U.S.C. 808(1).
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined these regulations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The various recordkeeping and reporting
requirements imposed under regulations established in 50 CFR part 20,
subpart K, are utilized in the formulation of migratory game bird
hunting regulations. Specifically, OMB has approved the information
collection requirements of the surveys associated with the Migratory
Bird Harvest Information Program and assigned clearance number 1018-
0015 (expires 2/29/2008). This information is used to provide a
sampling frame for voluntary national surveys to improve our harvest
estimates for all migratory game birds in order to better manage these
populations. OMB has also approved the information collection
requirements of the Sandhill Crane Harvest Survey and assigned
clearance number 1018-0023 (expires 11/30/2007). The information from
this survey is used to estimate the magnitude and the geographical and
temporal distribution of the harvest, and the portion it constitutes of
the total population.
A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certify, in compliance with the requirements
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State government or private entities. Therefore, this
rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act.
Civil Justice Reform--Executive Order 12988
In promulgating this rule, we have determined that it will not
unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Takings Implication Assessment
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule, authorized by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not have significant takings
implications and does not affect any constitutionally protected
property rights. This rule will not result in the physical occupancy of
property, the physical invasion of property, or the regulatory taking
of any property. In fact, these rules allow hunters to exercise
otherwise unavailable privileges and, therefore, reduce restrictions on
the use of private and public property.
Energy Effects--Executive Order 13211
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 on
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and
use. Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. While this rule is a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, it is not
expected to adversely affect energy supplies, distribution, or use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant energy action and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
[[Page 50166]]
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the
Federal Government has been given responsibility over these species by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Thus, in accordance with the President's
memorandum of April 29, 1994, ``Government-to-Government Relations with
Native American Tribal Governments'' (59 FR 22951), Executive Order
13175, and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated possible effects on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have determined that there are no effects
on Indian trust resources. However, in the April 11 proposed rule (72
FR 18328) we solicited proposals for special migratory bird hunting
regulations for certain Tribes on Federal Indian reservations, off-
reservation trust lands, and ceded lands for the 2007-08 migratory bird
hunting season. The resulting proposals will be contained in a separate
proposed rule. By virtue of these actions, we have consulted with all
the Tribes affected by this rule.
Federalism Effects
Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the
Federal Government has been given responsibility over these species by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually prescribe frameworks from
which the States make selections regarding the hunting of migratory
birds, and we employ guidelines to establish special regulations on
Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands. This process preserves the
ability of the States and tribes to determine which seasons meet their
individual needs. Any State or tribe may be more restrictive than the
Federal frameworks at any time. The frameworks are developed in a
cooperative process with the States and the Flyway Councils. This
process allows States to participate in the development of frameworks
from which they will make selections, thereby having an influence on
their own regulations. These rules do not have a substantial direct
effect on fiscal capacity, change the roles or responsibilities of
Federal or State governments, or intrude on State policy or
administration. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132,
these regulations do not have significant federalism effects and do not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Regulations Promulgation
The rulemaking process for migratory game bird hunting must, by its
nature, operate under severe time constraints. However, we intend that
the public be given the greatest possible opportunity to comment. Thus,
when the preliminary proposed rulemaking was published, we established
what we believed were the longest periods possible for public comment.
In doing this, we recognized that when the comment period closed, time
would be of the essence. That is, if there were a delay in the
effective date of these regulations after this final rulemaking, States
would have insufficient time to select season dates and limits, to
communicate those selections to us, and to establish and publicize the
necessary regulations and procedures to implement their decisions. We
therefore find that ``good cause'' exists, within the terms of 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and these regulations
will, therefore, take effect immediately upon publication. Accordingly,
with each conservation agency having had an opportunity to participate
in selecting the hunting seasons desired for its State or Territory on
those species of migratory birds for which open seasons are now
prescribed, and consideration having been given to all other relevant
matters presented, certain sections of title 50, chapter I, subchapter
B, part 20, subpart K, are hereby amended as set forth below.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
Dated: August 22, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 50, chapter I,
subchapter B, part 20, subpart K of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 20--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712 and 16 U.S.C. 742 a-j, Pub. L. 106-
108.
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[[Page 50167]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.000
[[Page 50168]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.001
[[Page 50169]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.002
[[Page 50170]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.003
[[Page 50171]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.004
[[Page 50172]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.005
[[Page 50173]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.006
[[Page 50174]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.007
[[Page 50175]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.008
[[Page 50176]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.009
[[Page 50177]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.010
[[Page 50178]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.011
[[Page 50179]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.012
[[Page 50180]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.013
[[Page 50181]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.014
[[Page 50182]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.015
[[Page 50183]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.016
[[Page 50184]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.017
[[Page 50185]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.018
[[Page 50186]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.019
[[Page 50187]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.020
[[Page 50188]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.021
[[Page 50189]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.022
[[Page 50190]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.023
[[Page 50191]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.024
[[Page 50192]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.025
[[Page 50193]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.026
[[Page 50194]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.027
[[Page 50195]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.028
[[Page 50196]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.029
[[Page 50197]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.030
[[Page 50198]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.031
[[Page 50199]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU07.032
[FR Doc. 07-4255 Filed 8-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-C