Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of the Treasury, 48221-48225 [E7-16711]
Download as PDF
48221
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 163
Thursday, August 23, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
5 CFR Part 3101
RINs 1550–AC03, 3209–AA15
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the
Department of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury (Department), with the
concurrence of the Office of
Government Ethics (OGE), is amending
the Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Supplemental Ethics Regulations). The
final rule revises the circumstances
under which covered Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS) employees may
obtain credit cards and loans secured by
a principal residence from OTSregulated savings associations or their
subsidiaries. This amendment also
modifies rules on disqualifications.
DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira
S. Kaye, Senior Ethics Counsel, Office of
the Assistant General Counsel (General
Law and Ethics), Department of the
Treasury, Room 2023, Washington, DC
20220, (202) 622–1963, or Elizabeth
Moore, Ethics Counsel, OTS Litigation
Division, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552, (202) 906–7039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
I. Background
The Office of Government Ethics
(OGE) has issued rules setting out the
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch at 5
CFR part 2635 (Standards). The
Treasury Supplemental Ethics
Regulations at 5 CFR part 3101
supplement these Standards, and were
issued to minimize potential conflicts of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Aug 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
interest by Department of Treasury
employees. The Treasury Supplemental
Ethics Regulations set out additional
rules for Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS) employees at 5 CFR 3101.109.
These rules were designed to prevent
employees of OTS from taking actions
that violate (or appear to violate)
conflict of interest laws or certain
criminal statutes, or that create (or may
create) an appearance of a loss of
impartiality.
The Treasury Supplemental Ethics
Regulations generally prohibit covered
OTS employees from seeking or
obtaining loans or other extensions of
credit from any OTS-regulated savings
association or from an officer, director,
employee or subsidiary of such a
savings association. 5 CFR
3101.109(c)(1).1 This prohibition
extends to the spouses and minor
children of covered OTS employees,
unless the loan or extension of credit
meets specified standards.2
The current Treasury Supplemental
Ethics Regulations prescribe an
exception to this general prohibition for
credit card accounts. Except for
examiners, a covered OTS employee (or
a spouse or minor child of a covered
OTS employee), may obtain and hold a
credit card from an OTS-regulated
savings association (or its subsidiary) if
the credit card is issued on terms and
conditions no more favorable than those
offered to the general public. 5 CFR
3101.109(c)(3)(i) (2006). An examiner
(or a spouse or minor child of an
examiner) may obtain and hold a credit
card from an OTS-regulated savings
association (or its subsidiary) only if: (1)
The savings association is not
headquartered in the examiner’s region;
(2) the examiner is not assigned to
examine the savings association; (3) the
terms and conditions are no more
favorable than those offered to the
1 Covered OTS employees include OTS
examiners, employees in positions at OTS grade 17
and above, and other designated OTS employees. 5
CFR 3101.109(a).
2 A spouse or a minor child may obtain a loan or
extension of credit if: (1) The loan is supported only
by the income or independent means of the spouse
or child; (2) the loan is obtained on terms and
conditions no more favorable than those offered to
the general public; and (3) the covered OTS
employee does not participate in the negotiation of
the loan, or serve as co-maker, endorser, or
guarantor. 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(2). This final rule
makes a clarifying change to the second of these
conditions to conform it to the statutory conditions
in 18 U.S.C. 212(c)(4)(A) and (B), as amended.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
general public; and (4) the examiner
submits a written disqualification from
examining that savings association. 5
CFR 3101.109(c)(3)(ii) (2006).
The more rigorous credit card rule for
examiners was designed to prevent
violations of 18 U.S.C. 213, a criminal
statute, which prohibits an examiner
from accepting a loan or gratuity from
a financial institution that he or she
examines. Until December 2003, 18
U.S.C. 213 (2000) provided:
Whoever, being an examiner or assistant
examiner of * * * financial institutions the
deposits of which are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation * * * accepts
a loan or gratuity from any bank, branch,
agency, corporation, association or
organization examined by him or from any
person connected [t]herewith, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than
one year, or both; and may be fined a further
sum equal to the money so loaned or gratuity
given, and shall be disqualified from holding
office as such examiner.
A related criminal statute, 18 U.S.C.
212, prohibits officers, directors, or
employees of financial institutions from
making or granting such loans or
gratuities.
On December 19, 2003, the President
signed the Preserving Independence of
Financial Institution Examinations Act
of 2003, Public Law 108–198, which
amended 18 U.S.C. 212 and 213. The
new law preserves the general
prohibition against an examiner
accepting a loan or gratuity from a
financial institution under examination,
but creates two exceptions to the
criminal bar. Under the new law, it is
no longer a crime for an examiner to
hold an open-end consumer credit card
account or obtain a loan secured by
residential real property that is used as
the principal residence of the examiner
if:
(A) The applicant satisfies any financial
requirements for the credit card account or
residential real property loan that are
generally applicable to all applicants for the
same type of credit card account or
residential real property loan;
(B) the terms and conditions applicable
with respect to such account or residential
real property loan, and any credit extended
to the examiner under such account or
residential real property loan, are no more
favorable generally to the examiner than the
terms and conditions that are generally
applicable to credit card accounts or
residential real property loans offered by the
same financial institution to other borrowers
[or] cardholders in comparable circumstances
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
48222
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 163 / Thursday, August 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
under open end consumer credit plans or for
residential real property loans; and
(C) with respect to residential real property
loans, the loan is with respect to the primary
residence of the applicant.3
Other types of loans, such as overdraft
protection not secured by a principal
residence, vacation home loans, car
loans, and personal loans still are
subject to the prohibitions in 18 U.S.C.
212 and 213. It remains a crime for an
examiner to examine an institution that
has extended those types of credit to
him or her.
The Department has reexamined the
restrictions on credit cards and loans on
principal residences for covered OTS
employees, and their spouses and minor
children, in light of these recent
statutory changes and is making several
revisions to the Treasury Supplemental
Ethics Regulation pursuant to its
rulemaking authority under 18 U.S.C.
212(b) and 5 CFR Part 2635. In making
these revisions, the Department has
consulted with the other financial
institution regulatory agencies. To the
extent that the revised provisions apply
to covered OTS employees, their
spouses and minor children, the
Department has determined, with OGE
concurrence, that the regulations are
needed so that a reasonable person
would not question the impartiality and
objectivity with which agency programs
are administered. See 5 CFR
2635.403(a). Further, with respect to the
revised restrictions and prohibitions on
the holding of financial interests
(indebtedness, that is certain loans and
extensions of credit) by covered OTS
employees’ spouses and minor children,
the Department has determined that
there is a direct and appropriate nexus
between such restrictions and
prohibitions as applied to the spouses
and minor children, and the efficiency
of covered employees’ service.
II. Rule Changes
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
A. Credit Card Loans
The Department has reviewed the
extent to which credit cards present
conflicts of interest for OTS examiners
and has concluded that, in most
instances, neither obtaining nor holding
a credit card creates a conflict of interest
or presents the likelihood of a loss of
impartiality by an OTS examiner.
Individuals usually do not negotiate the
terms and conditions of a credit card
account. Rather, relevant terms and
conditions, including credit limits, fees,
and rates, are generally set according to
various income and creditworthiness
standards.
3 18
U.S.C. 212(c)(4), as amended.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Aug 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Moreover, the present regulatory
restriction may have a detrimental
impact on OTS’s ability to supervise
certain operations. OTS supervises a
small number of thrifts with large credit
card portfolios. Due to the scope of
these institutions’ credit card
operations, OTS has experienced some
difficulty in fielding and maintaining
appropriate examination teams for the
institutions. Accordingly, the
Department believes that the examiner
restriction should be revised to ensure
that OTS Regional and Washington
offices have more flexibility to assign
projects to examiners.4
The Department is amending the
Treasury Supplemental Ethics
Regulations to permit examiners (and
their spouses and minor children) to
obtain credit cards from OTS-regulated
savings associations (or their
subsidiaries) on the same basis as other
covered OTS employees. Under the final
rule, any covered OTS employee (or
spouse or minor child of a covered OTS
employee) may obtain and hold a credit
card account established under an openend consumer credit plan and issued by
an OTS-regulated savings association (or
its subsidiary) subject to certain
conditions. These conditions were
designed to reflect the new statutory
exemption at 18 U.S.C. 212.
Specifically, the final rule states at
new amended paragraph (c)(3)(i) of
§ 3101.109 that covered OTS employees,
their spouses, and minor children may
obtain and hold a credit card
established under an open-end
consumer credit plan and issued by an
OTS-regulated savings association or its
subsidiary if: (1) The cardholder
satisfies all financial requirements for
the credit card account that are
generally applicable to all applicants for
the same type of credit card account;
and (2) the terms and conditions
applicable with respect to the account
and any credit extended to the
cardholder under the account are no
more favorable generally to that
cardholder than the terms and
4 On December 23, 2003, upon the enactment of
the revised statute, the OTS Director granted a
blanket waiver of the credit card regulation
pursuant to 5 CFR 3101.109(g). Specifically, the
OTS Director waived 5 CFR 3101.109(c) to permit
examiners, their spouses, and minor children to
obtain credit cards subject to the statutory
conditions. On March 31, 2006, the Director granted
a blanket waiver to permit all covered employees,
their spouses and minor children, to obtain loans
from OTS-regulated thrifts if the loan is secured by
the borrower’s principal residence and meets
certain other conditions. Covered employees are
required to report any such loans and credit cards
on their annual OTS supplemental financial
disclosure reports and to attest that the card or loan
was obtained and is being held on non-preferential
terms.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
conditions that are generally applicable
to credit card accounts offered by the
same savings association (or the same
subsidiary) to other cardholders in
comparable circumstances under openend consumer credit plans. These
requirements are modeled on the
conditions in 18 U.S.C. 212, as
amended, and are substantially identical
to the condition applicable to credit
card accounts permitted under the
current rules, which provides that credit
cards must be ‘‘issued and held on
terms and conditions no more favorable
than those offered [to] the general
public.’’ See 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(3)(i) and
(c)(3)(ii)(C) (2006).
Under the current Treasury
Supplemental Ethics Regulations, an
examiner must disqualify himself from
examining a savings association if the
examiner (or the spouse or minor child
of an examiner) has obtained a credit
card from that savings association or its
subsidiary. 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(3)(ii)(D)
(2006). Today’s final rule no longer
requires such a disqualification every
time the OTS examiner, spouse, or
minor child obtains a credit card loan
from a particular thrift or its
subsidiary.5 Instead, the final rule in
new amended paragraph (c)(3)(i)(C)
requires a covered OTS employee to
submit a written disqualification if the
employee (or his or her spouse or minor
child) as cardholder becomes involved
in an ‘‘adversarial dispute’’ with the
issuer of the credit card account. For the
purposes of this rule, a cardholder is
involved in an adversarial dispute if he
or she is delinquent in payments on the
credit card account; the issuer and the
cardholder are negotiating to restructure
the credit card debt; the issuer garnishes
the cardholder’s wages; the cardholder
disputes the terms and conditions of the
account; or the cardholder becomes
involved in any disagreement with the
issuer that casts doubt on the
employee’s ability to remain impartial
with respect to the savings association
or its subsidiaries. Preliminary inquiries
regarding the accuracy of billing
information or billed items are not, but
may become, an adversarial dispute.
Under amended paragraph (c)(3)(i)(C)
of the final rule, a written
disqualification must state that the
covered OTS employee will not
participate in any examination, the
review of any application, or any other
supervisory or regulatory matter directly
affecting the savings association or its
subsidiaries. This disqualification will
5 OTS will, however, continue to require covered
OTS employees to disclose their credit cards on
their annual OTS supplemental financial disclosure
reports, and to attest that their credit cards meet the
requirements of this rule.
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 163 / Thursday, August 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
not, however, prevent a covered OTS
employee from participating in
formulating OTS policy or writing
guidance, policy statements or
regulations generally applicable to
savings associations or their
subsidiaries.6
Currently, the rules disqualify an
examiner only with respect to activities
that affect the savings association or the
savings association’s subsidiaries. 5 CFR
3101.109(c)(3)(ii) (2006). The
disqualification does not extend to the
savings association’s holding company
or to the holding company’s other
subsidiaries. The final rule takes this
same approach. OTS may, of course,
require a covered OTS employee to
submit a disqualification that also
covers the holding company and its
other subsidiaries. On a case-by-case
basis, OTS may require a
disqualification if the relevant facts and
circumstances surrounding the
examiner’s participation in an
examination, the review of an
application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting the
holding company and its other
subsidiaries would cause a reasonable
person to question the examiner’s
impartiality. See 5 CFR 2635.502.
B. Loans Secured by Principal
Residence
The Department has also reviewed
whether it should retain restrictions on
loans secured by a principal residence.
Typically, home loans, unlike credit
card loans, are the subject of negotiation
between borrowers and lenders. While
such negotiations increase the
opportunity for a real or perceived
conflict of interest, the Department
believes that such conflicts may be
minimized by the imposition of
appropriate conditions. The Department
does not believe that this rule change
will unduly interfere with OTS’s ability
to distribute work assignments among
employees, since each covered OTS
employee is unlikely to have more than
one or two loans secured by a principal
residence.
Accordingly, the Department has
revised the rule in new amended
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of § 3101.109 to
permit a covered OTS employee (or a
spouse or minor child of a covered OTS
employee) to obtain and hold loans from
a savings association or subsidiary of a
savings association, subject to several
conditions. First, pursuant to new
amended paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(A), the
loan must be secured primarily by
6 The disqualification requirement may be waived
on a case-by-case basis under the circumstances
described at 5 CFR 3101.109(g).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Aug 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
residential real property that is the
borrower’s principal residence. This
final rule applies to any loan secured
primarily by a principal residence
including a new mortgage loan, a
refinanced loan, and a home equity line
of credit. The rule, however, applies
only to loans secured primarily by the
borrower’s principal residence. It does
not apply to loans secured by vacation
homes, investment properties, or other
dwellings. The rule permits the
borrower to retain a loan that was
permissible when it was made, even
though the residential real property has
ceased to be the borrower’s principal
residence. However, any subsequent
renewal or renegotiation of the original
terms of such a loan must meet the
requirements of the prohibited
borrowings rule.
Second, pursuant to amended
paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B), the borrower may
not apply for the loan while the covered
OTS employee participates, or is
scheduled to participate, in any
examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting the
savings association or its subsidiaries.
OTS believes that a reasonable person
might question the employee’s
impartiality in such an instance.
Third, the final rule incorporates
conditions designed to ensure
compliance with 18 U.S.C. 212, as
amended. Specifically, the rule provides
at amended paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(C) that a
borrower must satisfy all financial
requirements for the loan that are
generally applicable to all applicants for
the same type of residential real
property loan. Also, under amended
paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(D), the terms and
conditions applicable with respect to
the loan and any credit extended to the
borrower under the loan may be no
more favorable generally to the borrower
than the terms and conditions that are
generally applicable to residential real
property loans offered by the same
savings association (or same subsidiary)
to other borrowers in comparable
circumstances for residential real
property loans.
To permit OTS to monitor loans
under the principal residence exception,
the final rule requires covered
employees to provide certain
information to OTS. Specifically,
pursuant to amended paragraph
(c)(3)(ii)(E), a covered OTS employee
must inform his or her OTS supervisor
and the OTS ethics officer before the
borrower applies for a residential real
property loan under the principal
residence exemption. Immediately after
the borrower enters into the loan
agreement, amended paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48223
(c)(3)(ii)(F) provides that the covered
employee must also: Notify his or her
supervisor and the OTS ethics officer of
the agreement; certify that the loan
meets the requirements for the principal
residence exception; and submit a
written disqualification stating that he
or she will not participate in any
examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting the
savings association or its subsidiaries.7
Like the credit card disqualification,
this disqualification will not prevent the
covered OTS employee from
participating in formulating OTS policy
or writing guidance, policy statements
or regulations generally applicable to
savings associations; does not generally
extend to the savings association’s
holding company (or other holding
company affiliates); and may be waived
on a case-by-case basis under 5 CFR
3101.109(g).
C. Pre-Existing and Transferred Loans
The current rules at 5 CFR
3101.109(c)(4) (2006) permit a covered
OTS employee (or spouse or minor
child of a covered OTS employee) to
retain a loan on its original terms if (1)
the loan was incurred before April 30,
1991 or before employment with the
OTS, whichever date is later; or (2) the
loan was acquired by sale or transfer to
an OTS-regulated savings association or
by conversion or merger of the lender
into an OTS-regulated savings
association. A renewal or renegotiation
of such a pre-existing or transferred
loan, however, must comply with loan
restrictions in 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(1) and
(c)(2) (2006) of the current Treasury
Supplemental Ethics Regulations, prior
to this final rule amendment.
The final rule makes a few changes to
this provision. First, credit card
accounts will not be eligible for the preexisting or transferred loan exception in
amended § 3101.109(c)(4). OTS expects
all credit card accounts, including preexisting credit card accounts, to satisfy
the ‘‘arms-length terms’’ and other
requirements described in the other
exceptions under the final rule. The
final rule also requires a covered OTS
employee to provide the OTS ethics
officer with a timely notification when
the employee (or his or her spouse or
minor child) holds a pre-existing or
transferred loan under this section, and
to submit a written disqualification
stating that the employee will not
participate in any examination, the
review of any application, or any other
7 Covered OTS employees will also be required to
disclose these loans on their annual OTS
supplemental financial disclosure reports.
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
48224
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 163 / Thursday, August 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
supervisory or regulatory matter directly
affecting that savings association or its
subsidiaries.
D. Loans from Holding Companies
Additionally, OTS has decided to
prohibit an OTS examiner from
examining a savings and loan holding
company (or its subsidiaries), if the
holding company (or its subsidiary)
owns or holds the examiner’s loan. This
rule is not based on the criminal
provisions at 18 U.S.C. 212 and 213,
since these entities usually are not
financial institutions. Rather, OTS
believes that such arrangements would
raise a question about an examiner’s
impartiality in the mind of a reasonable
person with knowledge of the relevant
facts and circumstances. See 5 CFR
2635.502.
Specifically, the final rule states at
new paragraph (c)(5) of § 3101.109 that
an OTS examiner must submit a written
disqualification to OTS if the examiner
(or his or her spouse or minor child)
obtains or holds a loan from a savings
and loan holding company or its
subsidiary (other than a subsidiary that
is an OTS-regulated savings association
or its subsidiary). The written
disqualification must state that the
examiner will not participate in any
examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting that
lender.
However, the last sentence of new
paragraph (c)(5) states that an examiner
is not required to submit a
disqualification for any loan that would
have been permitted and would not
have required a disqualification under
the rules if a savings association had
made the loan. For example, an OTS
examiner would not be required to
submit a disqualification for a credit
card loan from a holding company if the
examiner satisfies all financial
requirements for the credit card account
that are generally applicable to all
applicants for the same kind of account,
and the terms and conditions applicable
to the account are no more favorable
generally to the cardholder than the
terms and conditions that are generally
applicable to credit card accounts
offered by the holding company. Of
course, the examiner would be required
to submit a written disqualification to
OTS if he or she became involved in an
adversarial dispute with the holding
company that issued the credit card
account.
E. Clarifications
In addition to the changes discussed
above, the Department has made
technical changes to the prohibition on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Aug 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
borrowing by a spouse or minor child to
conform the provisions addressing
permissible terms and conditions to the
related standard contained in the statute
at 18 U.S.C. 212(c)(4)(A) and (B), as
amended, and to use plain language in
the final rule consistent with 12 U.S.C.
4809.
III. Regulatory Findings
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), notice
of proposed rulemaking, opportunity for
public comment, and a 30-day delayed
effective date are not applicable to this
final rule amendment.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6) do not apply.
C. Executive Order 12866
The Department has determined that
this final rule does not constitute a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 3101
Conflict of interests, Ethics,
Extensions of credit, Government
employees, OTS employees.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department, with the
concurrence of OGE, amends 5 CFR part
3101 as follows:
PART 3101—SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT
FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
1. The authority citation for part 3101
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7301, 7353; 5
U.S.C. App. (Ethics in Government Act of
1978); 18 U.S.C. 212, 213; 26 U.S.C. 7214(b);
E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp.,
p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR
42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR
2635.105, 2635.203(a), 2635.403(a), 2635.803,
2635.807(a)(2)(ii).
2. In § 3101.109, revise paragraphs
(c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) and add a new
paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
I
§ 3101.109 Additional rules for Office of
Thrift Supervision employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Prohibition on borrowing by a
spouse or minor child. The prohibition
in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
applies to the spouse and minor child
of a covered OTS employee, except that
a spouse or minor child may obtain and
hold a loan or extension of credit from
an OTS-regulated savings association (or
its subsidiary) if:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) The loan or extension of credit is
supported only by the income or
independent means of the spouse or
minor child;
(ii) The spouse or minor child
satisfies all financial requirements for
the loan or extension of credit that are
generally applicable to all applicants for
the same type of loan or extension of
credit;
(iii) The terms and conditions
applicable with respect to the loan or
extension of credit and any credit
extended to the borrower under the loan
or extension of credit are no more
favorable generally to the borrower than
the terms and conditions that are
generally applicable to loans or
extensions of credit offered by the same
savings association (or same subsidiary)
to other borrowers in comparable
circumstances for the same type of loan
or extension of credit; and
(iv) The covered OTS employee does
not participate in the negotiation for the
loan or serve as a co-maker, endorser, or
guarantor of the loan or extension of
credit.
(3) Exceptions—(i) Credit cards. A
covered OTS employee (or a spouse or
minor child of a covered OTS employee)
may obtain and hold a credit card
account established under an open-end
consumer credit plan and issued by an
OTS-regulated savings association (or its
subsidiary), subject to the following
conditions:
(A) The cardholder must satisfy all
financial requirements for the credit
card account that are generally
applicable to all applicants for the same
type of credit card account;
(B) The terms and conditions
applicable with respect to the account
and any credit extended to the
cardholder under the account are no
more favorable generally to that
cardholder than the terms and
conditions that are generally applicable
to credit card accounts offered by the
same savings association (or the same
subsidiary) to other cardholders in
comparable circumstances under openend consumer credit plans; and
(C) The covered OTS employee must
submit a written disqualification to OTS
if the cardholder becomes involved in
an adversarial dispute with the issuer of
the credit card account. The written
disqualification must state that the
covered OTS employee will not
participate in any examination, the
review of any application, or any other
supervisory or regulatory matter directly
affecting the savings association or its
subsidiaries. For the purposes of this
paragraph (c)(3)(i), a cardholder is
involved in an adversarial dispute if he
or she is delinquent in payments on the
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 163 / Thursday, August 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
credit card account; the issuer and the
cardholder are negotiating to restructure
the credit card debt; the issuer garnishes
the cardholder’s wages; the cardholder
disputes the terms and conditions of the
account; or the cardholder becomes
involved in any disagreement with the
issuer that may cast doubt on the
covered OTS employee’s ability to
remain impartial with respect to the
savings association or its subsidiaries.
Preliminary inquiries to the issuer
regarding the accuracy of billing
information or billed items are not, but
may become, an adversarial dispute.
(ii) Loans secured primarily by
principal residence. A covered OTS
employee (or a spouse or minor child of
a covered OTS employee) may obtain
and hold a residential real property loan
from an OTS-regulated savings
association (or its subsidiary) subject to
the following conditions:
(A) The loan must be secured
primarily by residential real property
that is the borrower’s principal
residence. The borrower may retain the
loan if the residential real property
ceases to be that borrower’s principal
residence. However, any subsequent
renewal or renegotiation of the original
terms of such a loan must meet the
requirements of this paragraph (c)(3)(ii);
(B) The borrower may not apply for
the loan while the covered OTS
employee participates, or is scheduled
to participate, in any examination, the
review of any application, or any other
supervisory or regulatory matter directly
affecting the savings association or its
subsidiaries;
(C) The borrower must satisfy all
financial requirements for the loan that
are generally applicable to all applicants
for the same type of residential real
property loan;
(D) The terms and conditions
applicable with respect to the loan and
any credit extended to the borrower
under the loan are no more favorable
generally to that borrower than the
terms and conditions that are generally
applicable to residential real property
loans offered by the same savings
association (or same subsidiary) to other
borrowers in comparable circumstances
for residential real property loans;
(E) The covered OTS employee must
inform his or her OTS supervisor and
the OTS ethics officer before the
borrower applies for a residential real
property loan under this paragraph
(c)(3)(ii); and
(F) Immediately after the borrower
enters into the loan agreement, the
covered OTS employee must:
(1) Notify his or her supervisor and
the OTS ethics officer of the loan
agreement;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Aug 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
(2) Certify that the loan meets the
requirements of this paragraph (c)(3)(ii);
and
(3) Submit a written disqualification
stating that the covered OTS employee
will not participate in any examination,
the review of any application, or any
other supervisory or regulatory matter
directly affecting the savings association
or its subsidiaries.
(4) Pre-existing loans. (i) Other than a
credit card account, which must comply
with paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section,
a covered OTS employee (or spouse or
minor child of a covered OTS employee)
may retain a loan from an OTSregulated savings association (or its
subsidiary) on its original terms if:
(A) The loan was incurred before
April 30, 1991 or the date that the
individual became a covered OTS
employee, whichever date is later; or
(B) The savings association (or its
subsidiary) acquired the loan in a
purchase or other transfer, or acquired
the loan in a conversion or merger of the
lender.
(ii) A covered OTS employee must
notify the OTS ethics officer, in a timely
manner, of any loan that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(4)(i) of
this section, and must submit a written
disqualification stating that the covered
OTS employee will not participate in
any examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting the
savings association or its subsidiaries.
(iii) If a covered OTS employee (or his
or her spouse or minor child) renews or
renegotiates the original terms of a preexisting loan described in this
paragraph (c)(4), the renewed or
renegotiated loan will become subject to
paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this
section.
(5) Loans from holding companies. An
OTS examiner must submit to OTS a
written disqualification if the OTS
examiner (or a spouse or minor child of
an OTS examiner) obtains or holds a
loan from a savings and loan holding
company or its subsidiary (other than a
subsidiary that is an OTS-regulated
savings association or its subsidiary,
loans from which are covered by
paragraph (c)(3) of this section). The
written disqualification must state that
the examiner will not participate in any
examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting that
lender. A disqualification is not
required for a loan that would have been
permitted and would not have required
a disqualification under this paragraph
(c), if a savings association (or its
subsidiary) had made the loan.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48225
Dated: July 9, 2007.
Robert F. Hoyt,
General Counsel, Department of the Treasury.
Approved: August 14, 2007.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. E7–16711 Filed 8–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0005]
Emerald Ash Borer; Additions to
Quarantined Areas
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule
that amended the emerald ash borer
regulations by designating the States of
Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, in their
entirety, as quarantined areas. The
interim rule was necessary to prevent
the artificial spread of the emerald ash
borer into noninfested areas of the
United States. As a result of the interim
rule, the interstate movement of
regulated articles from those States is
restricted.
Effective on August 23, 2007, we
are adopting as a final rule the interim
rule published at 72 FR 15597–15598 on
April 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah McPartlan, National Emerald
Ash Borer Program Manager, Emergency
and Domestic Programs, PPQ, APHIS,
4700 River Road Unit 137, Riverdale,
MD 20737–1236; (301) 734–5356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
The emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus
planipennis) is a destructive
woodboring insect that attacks ash trees
(Fraxinus spp., including green ash,
white ash, black ash, and several
horticultural varieties of ash). The
insect, which is indigenous to Asia and
known to occur in China, Korea, Japan,
Mongolia, the Russian Far East, Taiwan,
and Canada, eventually kills healthy ash
trees after it bores beneath their bark
and disrupts their vascular tissues.
The EAB regulations in 7 CFR 301.53–
1 through 301.53–9 (referred to below as
the regulations) restrict the interstate
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 163 (Thursday, August 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48221-48225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16711]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 163 / Thursday, August 23, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 48221]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
5 CFR Part 3101
RINs 1550-AC03, 3209-AA15
Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of the Treasury
AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury (Department), with the
concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), is amending the
Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury Supplemental Ethics Regulations).
The final rule revises the circumstances under which covered Office of
Thrift Supervision (OTS) employees may obtain credit cards and loans
secured by a principal residence from OTS-regulated savings
associations or their subsidiaries. This amendment also modifies rules
on disqualifications.
DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira S. Kaye, Senior Ethics Counsel,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel (General Law and Ethics),
Department of the Treasury, Room 2023, Washington, DC 20220, (202) 622-
1963, or Elizabeth Moore, Ethics Counsel, OTS Litigation Division, 1700
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, (202) 906-7039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Office of Government Ethics (OGE) has issued rules setting out
the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch
at 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards). The Treasury Supplemental Ethics
Regulations at 5 CFR part 3101 supplement these Standards, and were
issued to minimize potential conflicts of interest by Department of
Treasury employees. The Treasury Supplemental Ethics Regulations set
out additional rules for Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) employees
at 5 CFR 3101.109. These rules were designed to prevent employees of
OTS from taking actions that violate (or appear to violate) conflict of
interest laws or certain criminal statutes, or that create (or may
create) an appearance of a loss of impartiality.
The Treasury Supplemental Ethics Regulations generally prohibit
covered OTS employees from seeking or obtaining loans or other
extensions of credit from any OTS-regulated savings association or from
an officer, director, employee or subsidiary of such a savings
association. 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(1).\1\ This prohibition extends to the
spouses and minor children of covered OTS employees, unless the loan or
extension of credit meets specified standards.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Covered OTS employees include OTS examiners, employees in
positions at OTS grade 17 and above, and other designated OTS
employees. 5 CFR 3101.109(a).
\2\ A spouse or a minor child may obtain a loan or extension of
credit if: (1) The loan is supported only by the income or
independent means of the spouse or child; (2) the loan is obtained
on terms and conditions no more favorable than those offered to the
general public; and (3) the covered OTS employee does not
participate in the negotiation of the loan, or serve as co-maker,
endorser, or guarantor. 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(2). This final rule makes
a clarifying change to the second of these conditions to conform it
to the statutory conditions in 18 U.S.C. 212(c)(4)(A) and (B), as
amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current Treasury Supplemental Ethics Regulations prescribe an
exception to this general prohibition for credit card accounts. Except
for examiners, a covered OTS employee (or a spouse or minor child of a
covered OTS employee), may obtain and hold a credit card from an OTS-
regulated savings association (or its subsidiary) if the credit card is
issued on terms and conditions no more favorable than those offered to
the general public. 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(3)(i) (2006). An examiner (or a
spouse or minor child of an examiner) may obtain and hold a credit card
from an OTS-regulated savings association (or its subsidiary) only if:
(1) The savings association is not headquartered in the examiner's
region; (2) the examiner is not assigned to examine the savings
association; (3) the terms and conditions are no more favorable than
those offered to the general public; and (4) the examiner submits a
written disqualification from examining that savings association. 5 CFR
3101.109(c)(3)(ii) (2006).
The more rigorous credit card rule for examiners was designed to
prevent violations of 18 U.S.C. 213, a criminal statute, which
prohibits an examiner from accepting a loan or gratuity from a
financial institution that he or she examines. Until December 2003, 18
U.S.C. 213 (2000) provided:
Whoever, being an examiner or assistant examiner of * * *
financial institutions the deposits of which are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation * * * accepts a loan or
gratuity from any bank, branch, agency, corporation, association or
organization examined by him or from any person connected
[t]herewith, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both; and may be fined a further sum equal to the
money so loaned or gratuity given, and shall be disqualified from
holding office as such examiner.
A related criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. 212, prohibits officers,
directors, or employees of financial institutions from making or
granting such loans or gratuities.
On December 19, 2003, the President signed the Preserving
Independence of Financial Institution Examinations Act of 2003, Public
Law 108-198, which amended 18 U.S.C. 212 and 213. The new law preserves
the general prohibition against an examiner accepting a loan or
gratuity from a financial institution under examination, but creates
two exceptions to the criminal bar. Under the new law, it is no longer
a crime for an examiner to hold an open-end consumer credit card
account or obtain a loan secured by residential real property that is
used as the principal residence of the examiner if:
(A) The applicant satisfies any financial requirements for the
credit card account or residential real property loan that are
generally applicable to all applicants for the same type of credit
card account or residential real property loan;
(B) the terms and conditions applicable with respect to such
account or residential real property loan, and any credit extended
to the examiner under such account or residential real property
loan, are no more favorable generally to the examiner than the terms
and conditions that are generally applicable to credit card accounts
or residential real property loans offered by the same financial
institution to other borrowers [or] cardholders in comparable
circumstances
[[Page 48222]]
under open end consumer credit plans or for residential real
property loans; and
(C) with respect to residential real property loans, the loan is
with respect to the primary residence of the applicant.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 18 U.S.C. 212(c)(4), as amended.
Other types of loans, such as overdraft protection not secured by a
principal residence, vacation home loans, car loans, and personal loans
still are subject to the prohibitions in 18 U.S.C. 212 and 213. It
remains a crime for an examiner to examine an institution that has
extended those types of credit to him or her.
The Department has reexamined the restrictions on credit cards and
loans on principal residences for covered OTS employees, and their
spouses and minor children, in light of these recent statutory changes
and is making several revisions to the Treasury Supplemental Ethics
Regulation pursuant to its rulemaking authority under 18 U.S.C. 212(b)
and 5 CFR Part 2635. In making these revisions, the Department has
consulted with the other financial institution regulatory agencies. To
the extent that the revised provisions apply to covered OTS employees,
their spouses and minor children, the Department has determined, with
OGE concurrence, that the regulations are needed so that a reasonable
person would not question the impartiality and objectivity with which
agency programs are administered. See 5 CFR 2635.403(a). Further, with
respect to the revised restrictions and prohibitions on the holding of
financial interests (indebtedness, that is certain loans and extensions
of credit) by covered OTS employees' spouses and minor children, the
Department has determined that there is a direct and appropriate nexus
between such restrictions and prohibitions as applied to the spouses
and minor children, and the efficiency of covered employees' service.
II. Rule Changes
A. Credit Card Loans
The Department has reviewed the extent to which credit cards
present conflicts of interest for OTS examiners and has concluded that,
in most instances, neither obtaining nor holding a credit card creates
a conflict of interest or presents the likelihood of a loss of
impartiality by an OTS examiner. Individuals usually do not negotiate
the terms and conditions of a credit card account. Rather, relevant
terms and conditions, including credit limits, fees, and rates, are
generally set according to various income and creditworthiness
standards.
Moreover, the present regulatory restriction may have a detrimental
impact on OTS's ability to supervise certain operations. OTS supervises
a small number of thrifts with large credit card portfolios. Due to the
scope of these institutions' credit card operations, OTS has
experienced some difficulty in fielding and maintaining appropriate
examination teams for the institutions. Accordingly, the Department
believes that the examiner restriction should be revised to ensure that
OTS Regional and Washington offices have more flexibility to assign
projects to examiners.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ On December 23, 2003, upon the enactment of the revised
statute, the OTS Director granted a blanket waiver of the credit
card regulation pursuant to 5 CFR 3101.109(g). Specifically, the OTS
Director waived 5 CFR 3101.109(c) to permit examiners, their
spouses, and minor children to obtain credit cards subject to the
statutory conditions. On March 31, 2006, the Director granted a
blanket waiver to permit all covered employees, their spouses and
minor children, to obtain loans from OTS-regulated thrifts if the
loan is secured by the borrower's principal residence and meets
certain other conditions. Covered employees are required to report
any such loans and credit cards on their annual OTS supplemental
financial disclosure reports and to attest that the card or loan was
obtained and is being held on non-preferential terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department is amending the Treasury Supplemental Ethics
Regulations to permit examiners (and their spouses and minor children)
to obtain credit cards from OTS-regulated savings associations (or
their subsidiaries) on the same basis as other covered OTS employees.
Under the final rule, any covered OTS employee (or spouse or minor
child of a covered OTS employee) may obtain and hold a credit card
account established under an open-end consumer credit plan and issued
by an OTS-regulated savings association (or its subsidiary) subject to
certain conditions. These conditions were designed to reflect the new
statutory exemption at 18 U.S.C. 212.
Specifically, the final rule states at new amended paragraph
(c)(3)(i) of Sec. 3101.109 that covered OTS employees, their spouses,
and minor children may obtain and hold a credit card established under
an open-end consumer credit plan and issued by an OTS-regulated savings
association or its subsidiary if: (1) The cardholder satisfies all
financial requirements for the credit card account that are generally
applicable to all applicants for the same type of credit card account;
and (2) the terms and conditions applicable with respect to the account
and any credit extended to the cardholder under the account are no more
favorable generally to that cardholder than the terms and conditions
that are generally applicable to credit card accounts offered by the
same savings association (or the same subsidiary) to other cardholders
in comparable circumstances under open-end consumer credit plans. These
requirements are modeled on the conditions in 18 U.S.C. 212, as
amended, and are substantially identical to the condition applicable to
credit card accounts permitted under the current rules, which provides
that credit cards must be ``issued and held on terms and conditions no
more favorable than those offered [to] the general public.'' See 5 CFR
3101.109(c)(3)(i) and (c)(3)(ii)(C) (2006).
Under the current Treasury Supplemental Ethics Regulations, an
examiner must disqualify himself from examining a savings association
if the examiner (or the spouse or minor child of an examiner) has
obtained a credit card from that savings association or its subsidiary.
5 CFR 3101.109(c)(3)(ii)(D) (2006). Today's final rule no longer
requires such a disqualification every time the OTS examiner, spouse,
or minor child obtains a credit card loan from a particular thrift or
its subsidiary.\5\ Instead, the final rule in new amended paragraph
(c)(3)(i)(C) requires a covered OTS employee to submit a written
disqualification if the employee (or his or her spouse or minor child)
as cardholder becomes involved in an ``adversarial dispute'' with the
issuer of the credit card account. For the purposes of this rule, a
cardholder is involved in an adversarial dispute if he or she is
delinquent in payments on the credit card account; the issuer and the
cardholder are negotiating to restructure the credit card debt; the
issuer garnishes the cardholder's wages; the cardholder disputes the
terms and conditions of the account; or the cardholder becomes involved
in any disagreement with the issuer that casts doubt on the employee's
ability to remain impartial with respect to the savings association or
its subsidiaries. Preliminary inquiries regarding the accuracy of
billing information or billed items are not, but may become, an
adversarial dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ OTS will, however, continue to require covered OTS employees
to disclose their credit cards on their annual OTS supplemental
financial disclosure reports, and to attest that their credit cards
meet the requirements of this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under amended paragraph (c)(3)(i)(C) of the final rule, a written
disqualification must state that the covered OTS employee will not
participate in any examination, the review of any application, or any
other supervisory or regulatory matter directly affecting the savings
association or its subsidiaries. This disqualification will
[[Page 48223]]
not, however, prevent a covered OTS employee from participating in
formulating OTS policy or writing guidance, policy statements or
regulations generally applicable to savings associations or their
subsidiaries.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The disqualification requirement may be waived on a case-by-
case basis under the circumstances described at 5 CFR 3101.109(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the rules disqualify an examiner only with respect to
activities that affect the savings association or the savings
association's subsidiaries. 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(3)(ii) (2006). The
disqualification does not extend to the savings association's holding
company or to the holding company's other subsidiaries. The final rule
takes this same approach. OTS may, of course, require a covered OTS
employee to submit a disqualification that also covers the holding
company and its other subsidiaries. On a case-by-case basis, OTS may
require a disqualification if the relevant facts and circumstances
surrounding the examiner's participation in an examination, the review
of an application, or any other supervisory or regulatory matter
directly affecting the holding company and its other subsidiaries would
cause a reasonable person to question the examiner's impartiality. See
5 CFR 2635.502.
B. Loans Secured by Principal Residence
The Department has also reviewed whether it should retain
restrictions on loans secured by a principal residence. Typically, home
loans, unlike credit card loans, are the subject of negotiation between
borrowers and lenders. While such negotiations increase the opportunity
for a real or perceived conflict of interest, the Department believes
that such conflicts may be minimized by the imposition of appropriate
conditions. The Department does not believe that this rule change will
unduly interfere with OTS's ability to distribute work assignments
among employees, since each covered OTS employee is unlikely to have
more than one or two loans secured by a principal residence.
Accordingly, the Department has revised the rule in new amended
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of Sec. 3101.109 to permit a covered OTS employee
(or a spouse or minor child of a covered OTS employee) to obtain and
hold loans from a savings association or subsidiary of a savings
association, subject to several conditions. First, pursuant to new
amended paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(A), the loan must be secured primarily by
residential real property that is the borrower's principal residence.
This final rule applies to any loan secured primarily by a principal
residence including a new mortgage loan, a refinanced loan, and a home
equity line of credit. The rule, however, applies only to loans secured
primarily by the borrower's principal residence. It does not apply to
loans secured by vacation homes, investment properties, or other
dwellings. The rule permits the borrower to retain a loan that was
permissible when it was made, even though the residential real property
has ceased to be the borrower's principal residence. However, any
subsequent renewal or renegotiation of the original terms of such a
loan must meet the requirements of the prohibited borrowings rule.
Second, pursuant to amended paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B), the borrower
may not apply for the loan while the covered OTS employee participates,
or is scheduled to participate, in any examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or regulatory matter directly
affecting the savings association or its subsidiaries. OTS believes
that a reasonable person might question the employee's impartiality in
such an instance.
Third, the final rule incorporates conditions designed to ensure
compliance with 18 U.S.C. 212, as amended. Specifically, the rule
provides at amended paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(C) that a borrower must
satisfy all financial requirements for the loan that are generally
applicable to all applicants for the same type of residential real
property loan. Also, under amended paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(D), the terms
and conditions applicable with respect to the loan and any credit
extended to the borrower under the loan may be no more favorable
generally to the borrower than the terms and conditions that are
generally applicable to residential real property loans offered by the
same savings association (or same subsidiary) to other borrowers in
comparable circumstances for residential real property loans.
To permit OTS to monitor loans under the principal residence
exception, the final rule requires covered employees to provide certain
information to OTS. Specifically, pursuant to amended paragraph
(c)(3)(ii)(E), a covered OTS employee must inform his or her OTS
supervisor and the OTS ethics officer before the borrower applies for a
residential real property loan under the principal residence exemption.
Immediately after the borrower enters into the loan agreement, amended
paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(F) provides that the covered employee must also:
Notify his or her supervisor and the OTS ethics officer of the
agreement; certify that the loan meets the requirements for the
principal residence exception; and submit a written disqualification
stating that he or she will not participate in any examination, the
review of any application, or any other supervisory or regulatory
matter directly affecting the savings association or its
subsidiaries.\7\ Like the credit card disqualification, this
disqualification will not prevent the covered OTS employee from
participating in formulating OTS policy or writing guidance, policy
statements or regulations generally applicable to savings associations;
does not generally extend to the savings association's holding company
(or other holding company affiliates); and may be waived on a case-by-
case basis under 5 CFR 3101.109(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Covered OTS employees will also be required to disclose
these loans on their annual OTS supplemental financial disclosure
reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Pre-Existing and Transferred Loans
The current rules at 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(4) (2006) permit a covered
OTS employee (or spouse or minor child of a covered OTS employee) to
retain a loan on its original terms if (1) the loan was incurred before
April 30, 1991 or before employment with the OTS, whichever date is
later; or (2) the loan was acquired by sale or transfer to an OTS-
regulated savings association or by conversion or merger of the lender
into an OTS-regulated savings association. A renewal or renegotiation
of such a pre-existing or transferred loan, however, must comply with
loan restrictions in 5 CFR 3101.109(c)(1) and (c)(2) (2006) of the
current Treasury Supplemental Ethics Regulations, prior to this final
rule amendment.
The final rule makes a few changes to this provision. First, credit
card accounts will not be eligible for the pre-existing or transferred
loan exception in amended Sec. 3101.109(c)(4). OTS expects all credit
card accounts, including pre-existing credit card accounts, to satisfy
the ``arms-length terms'' and other requirements described in the other
exceptions under the final rule. The final rule also requires a covered
OTS employee to provide the OTS ethics officer with a timely
notification when the employee (or his or her spouse or minor child)
holds a pre-existing or transferred loan under this section, and to
submit a written disqualification stating that the employee will not
participate in any examination, the review of any application, or any
other
[[Page 48224]]
supervisory or regulatory matter directly affecting that savings
association or its subsidiaries.
D. Loans from Holding Companies
Additionally, OTS has decided to prohibit an OTS examiner from
examining a savings and loan holding company (or its subsidiaries), if
the holding company (or its subsidiary) owns or holds the examiner's
loan. This rule is not based on the criminal provisions at 18 U.S.C.
212 and 213, since these entities usually are not financial
institutions. Rather, OTS believes that such arrangements would raise a
question about an examiner's impartiality in the mind of a reasonable
person with knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances. See 5
CFR 2635.502.
Specifically, the final rule states at new paragraph (c)(5) of
Sec. 3101.109 that an OTS examiner must submit a written
disqualification to OTS if the examiner (or his or her spouse or minor
child) obtains or holds a loan from a savings and loan holding company
or its subsidiary (other than a subsidiary that is an OTS-regulated
savings association or its subsidiary). The written disqualification
must state that the examiner will not participate in any examination,
the review of any application, or any other supervisory or regulatory
matter directly affecting that lender.
However, the last sentence of new paragraph (c)(5) states that an
examiner is not required to submit a disqualification for any loan that
would have been permitted and would not have required a
disqualification under the rules if a savings association had made the
loan. For example, an OTS examiner would not be required to submit a
disqualification for a credit card loan from a holding company if the
examiner satisfies all financial requirements for the credit card
account that are generally applicable to all applicants for the same
kind of account, and the terms and conditions applicable to the account
are no more favorable generally to the cardholder than the terms and
conditions that are generally applicable to credit card accounts
offered by the holding company. Of course, the examiner would be
required to submit a written disqualification to OTS if he or she
became involved in an adversarial dispute with the holding company that
issued the credit card account.
E. Clarifications
In addition to the changes discussed above, the Department has made
technical changes to the prohibition on borrowing by a spouse or minor
child to conform the provisions addressing permissible terms and
conditions to the related standard contained in the statute at 18
U.S.C. 212(c)(4)(A) and (B), as amended, and to use plain language in
the final rule consistent with 12 U.S.C. 4809.
III. Regulatory Findings
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), notice of proposed rulemaking,
opportunity for public comment, and a 30-day delayed effective date are
not applicable to this final rule amendment.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do
not apply.
C. Executive Order 12866
The Department has determined that this final rule does not
constitute a ``significant regulatory action'' for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 3101
Conflict of interests, Ethics, Extensions of credit, Government
employees, OTS employees.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department, with the
concurrence of OGE, amends 5 CFR part 3101 as follows:
PART 3101--SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
0
1. The authority citation for part 3101 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7301, 7353; 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics in
Government Act of 1978); 18 U.S.C. 212, 213; 26 U.S.C. 7214(b); E.O.
12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O.
12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR 2635.105,
2635.203(a), 2635.403(a), 2635.803, 2635.807(a)(2)(ii).
0
2. In Sec. 3101.109, revise paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) and
add a new paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 3101.109 Additional rules for Office of Thrift Supervision
employees.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Prohibition on borrowing by a spouse or minor child. The
prohibition in paragraph (c)(1) of this section applies to the spouse
and minor child of a covered OTS employee, except that a spouse or
minor child may obtain and hold a loan or extension of credit from an
OTS-regulated savings association (or its subsidiary) if:
(i) The loan or extension of credit is supported only by the income
or independent means of the spouse or minor child;
(ii) The spouse or minor child satisfies all financial requirements
for the loan or extension of credit that are generally applicable to
all applicants for the same type of loan or extension of credit;
(iii) The terms and conditions applicable with respect to the loan
or extension of credit and any credit extended to the borrower under
the loan or extension of credit are no more favorable generally to the
borrower than the terms and conditions that are generally applicable to
loans or extensions of credit offered by the same savings association
(or same subsidiary) to other borrowers in comparable circumstances for
the same type of loan or extension of credit; and
(iv) The covered OTS employee does not participate in the
negotiation for the loan or serve as a co-maker, endorser, or guarantor
of the loan or extension of credit.
(3) Exceptions--(i) Credit cards. A covered OTS employee (or a
spouse or minor child of a covered OTS employee) may obtain and hold a
credit card account established under an open-end consumer credit plan
and issued by an OTS-regulated savings association (or its subsidiary),
subject to the following conditions:
(A) The cardholder must satisfy all financial requirements for the
credit card account that are generally applicable to all applicants for
the same type of credit card account;
(B) The terms and conditions applicable with respect to the account
and any credit extended to the cardholder under the account are no more
favorable generally to that cardholder than the terms and conditions
that are generally applicable to credit card accounts offered by the
same savings association (or the same subsidiary) to other cardholders
in comparable circumstances under open-end consumer credit plans; and
(C) The covered OTS employee must submit a written disqualification
to OTS if the cardholder becomes involved in an adversarial dispute
with the issuer of the credit card account. The written
disqualification must state that the covered OTS employee will not
participate in any examination, the review of any application, or any
other supervisory or regulatory matter directly affecting the savings
association or its subsidiaries. For the purposes of this paragraph
(c)(3)(i), a cardholder is involved in an adversarial dispute if he or
she is delinquent in payments on the
[[Page 48225]]
credit card account; the issuer and the cardholder are negotiating to
restructure the credit card debt; the issuer garnishes the cardholder's
wages; the cardholder disputes the terms and conditions of the account;
or the cardholder becomes involved in any disagreement with the issuer
that may cast doubt on the covered OTS employee's ability to remain
impartial with respect to the savings association or its subsidiaries.
Preliminary inquiries to the issuer regarding the accuracy of billing
information or billed items are not, but may become, an adversarial
dispute.
(ii) Loans secured primarily by principal residence. A covered OTS
employee (or a spouse or minor child of a covered OTS employee) may
obtain and hold a residential real property loan from an OTS-regulated
savings association (or its subsidiary) subject to the following
conditions:
(A) The loan must be secured primarily by residential real property
that is the borrower's principal residence. The borrower may retain the
loan if the residential real property ceases to be that borrower's
principal residence. However, any subsequent renewal or renegotiation
of the original terms of such a loan must meet the requirements of this
paragraph (c)(3)(ii);
(B) The borrower may not apply for the loan while the covered OTS
employee participates, or is scheduled to participate, in any
examination, the review of any application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting the savings association or its
subsidiaries;
(C) The borrower must satisfy all financial requirements for the
loan that are generally applicable to all applicants for the same type
of residential real property loan;
(D) The terms and conditions applicable with respect to the loan
and any credit extended to the borrower under the loan are no more
favorable generally to that borrower than the terms and conditions that
are generally applicable to residential real property loans offered by
the same savings association (or same subsidiary) to other borrowers in
comparable circumstances for residential real property loans;
(E) The covered OTS employee must inform his or her OTS supervisor
and the OTS ethics officer before the borrower applies for a
residential real property loan under this paragraph (c)(3)(ii); and
(F) Immediately after the borrower enters into the loan agreement,
the covered OTS employee must:
(1) Notify his or her supervisor and the OTS ethics officer of the
loan agreement;
(2) Certify that the loan meets the requirements of this paragraph
(c)(3)(ii); and
(3) Submit a written disqualification stating that the covered OTS
employee will not participate in any examination, the review of any
application, or any other supervisory or regulatory matter directly
affecting the savings association or its subsidiaries.
(4) Pre-existing loans. (i) Other than a credit card account, which
must comply with paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section, a covered OTS
employee (or spouse or minor child of a covered OTS employee) may
retain a loan from an OTS-regulated savings association (or its
subsidiary) on its original terms if:
(A) The loan was incurred before April 30, 1991 or the date that
the individual became a covered OTS employee, whichever date is later;
or
(B) The savings association (or its subsidiary) acquired the loan
in a purchase or other transfer, or acquired the loan in a conversion
or merger of the lender.
(ii) A covered OTS employee must notify the OTS ethics officer, in
a timely manner, of any loan that meets the requirements of paragraph
(c)(4)(i) of this section, and must submit a written disqualification
stating that the covered OTS employee will not participate in any
examination, the review of any application, or any other supervisory or
regulatory matter directly affecting the savings association or its
subsidiaries.
(iii) If a covered OTS employee (or his or her spouse or minor
child) renews or renegotiates the original terms of a pre-existing loan
described in this paragraph (c)(4), the renewed or renegotiated loan
will become subject to paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this
section.
(5) Loans from holding companies. An OTS examiner must submit to
OTS a written disqualification if the OTS examiner (or a spouse or
minor child of an OTS examiner) obtains or holds a loan from a savings
and loan holding company or its subsidiary (other than a subsidiary
that is an OTS-regulated savings association or its subsidiary, loans
from which are covered by paragraph (c)(3) of this section). The
written disqualification must state that the examiner will not
participate in any examination, the review of any application, or any
other supervisory or regulatory matter directly affecting that lender.
A disqualification is not required for a loan that would have been
permitted and would not have required a disqualification under this
paragraph (c), if a savings association (or its subsidiary) had made
the loan.
* * * * *
Dated: July 9, 2007.
Robert F. Hoyt,
General Counsel, Department of the Treasury.
Approved: August 14, 2007.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. E7-16711 Filed 8-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P