Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 46966-46968 [E7-16600]
Download as PDF
46966
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices
Comment 40: Use of Material-Specific
Conversion Rate for FIBERBOARDMD,
PAPEREDFIBERBOARDMD, and
FIBERBOARDPACKING
Comment 41: WOODPLUG—Clerical Error
Allegation
Comment 42: OKOUEMEVEMEER—
Clerical Error Allegation
VI. First Wood-Specific Issues
Comment 43: Rescission of First Wood’s
New Shipper Review is Consistent With
Department Precedent
VII. Guanqiu-Specific Issues
Comment 44: HTS Classification for
Plywood
Comment 45: HTS Classification for MDF
Comment 46: HTS Classification for Resin
Comment 47: HTS Classification for Paint
Comment 48: Surrogate Value Selection for
Ocean Freight
VIII. Starcorp-Specific Issues
Comment 49: Total Labor Hour
Consumption
Comment 50: Market Economy Purchases,
Wood Materials and Wood Screws
Comment 51: Department’s Conduct at
Verification
Comment 52: Timing of Verification
Outline
Comment 53: Appropriateness of PlantSpecific versus Combined FOP Data and
Valuation of the Appropriate Data
Comment 54: Application of Partial
Adverse Facts Available for CONNUMs
Consisting of Sets and ‘‘Sold But Not
Produced’’
Comment 55: Starcorp’s Financial
Statements
Comment 56: Raw Material Consumption
Methodology
Comment 57: Non-Wood Materials
Comment 58: Valuation of Thinner
Comment 59: Electricity
Comment 60: Packing Materials
Comment 61: Minor Corrections
Comment 62: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available
IX. Separate Rate Company-Specific Issues
Comment 63: Separate-Rate Status for New
Four Seas
Comment 64: Separate-Rate Status for
Winny and Triple J
Comment 65: Separate-Rate Status for ZY
Wooden/MY Trading
[FR Doc. E7–16584 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Certification
Requirements for NOAA’s
Hydrographic Product Quality
Assurance Program
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Aug 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before October 22,
2007.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to David Enabnit, 301–
71302770 x132,
Dave.Enabnit@NOAA.gov.
Dated: August 16, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–16543 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P
ADDRESSES:
I. Abstract
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
was mandated to develop and
implement a quality assurance program
under which the Administrator may
certify privately-made hydrographic
products. The Administrator fulfilled
this mandate by establishing procedures
by which hydrographic products are
proposed for certification; by which
standards and compliance tests are
developed, adopted, and applied for
those products; and by which
certification is awarded or denied.
These procedures are now 15 CFR part
996. The application and recordkeeping
requirements at 15 CFR part 996 are
basis for this collection of information.
II. Method of Collection
Paper applications and electronic
reports are required from participants.
Methods of submittal include mail,
Internet, and facsimile transmission of
paper forms.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0648–0507.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2.
Estimated Time per Response: 4
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 24.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XB42
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; recovery
plan and 5-year review for the Hawaiian
monk seal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
adoption of an Endangered Species Act
(ESA) Recovery Plan (Recovery Plan)
and 5-year review for the Hawaiian
monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi).
The Recovery Plan contains revisions
and additions in consideration of public
comments on the proposed draft
Recovery Plan for the Hawaiian Monk
Seal. This is the first 5-year review
completed for the Hawaiian monk seal.
ADDRESSES: Additional information
about the Recovery Plan and 5-year
review may be obtained by writing to
Dr. Michelle Yuen, National Marine
Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands
Regional Office, Protected Resources
Division, 1601 Kapiolani Boulevard
Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI, 96814 or send
an electronic message to
michelle.yuen@noaa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices
Electronic copies of the Recovery
Plan, the 5-year review, and a summary
of NMFS’s response to public comments
on the Recovery Plan are available
online at the NMFS Office of Protected
Resources website: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/species/mammals/pinnipeds/
hawaiianmonkseal.htm
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Yuen (808–944–2243), e-mail:
michelle.yuen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Recovery Plan Background
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species
listed under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). The ESA requires that
recovery plans incorporate (1) objective,
measurable criteria that, when met,
would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or
endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to
achieve the plan’s goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs
to implement recovery actions. The ESA
requires the development of recovery
plans for listed species unless such a
plan would not promote the recovery of
a particular species. NMFS’s goal is to
restore the endangered Hawaiian monk
seal population to the point where they
are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystem and no
longer need the protections of the ESA.
The Hawaiian monk seal has the
distinction of being the only endangered
marine mammal species whose entire
range, historical and current, lies within
the United States of America. The
majority of the population of Hawaiian
monk seals now occupies the
northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI)
with six main breeding sub-populations.
The species is also found in lower
numbers in the main Hawaiian Islands
(MHI), where the population size and
range both appear to be expanding. The
Hawaiian monk seal was listed as an
endangered species under the ESA on
November 23, 1976 (41 FR 51611). On
April 30, 1986 (51 FR 16047), critical
habitat was designated at all beach
areas, lagoon waters, and ocean waters
out to a depth of 10 fathoms around
Kure Atoll, Midway, Pearl and Hermes
Reef, Lisianski Island, Laysan Island,
Gardner Pinnacles, French Frigate
Shoals, Necker Island and Nihoa Island;
critical habitat was extended to include
Maro Reef and waters around all habitat
out to the 20 fathom isobath on May 26,
1988. The best estimate of the total
population size in 2006 is 1,202 seals.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Aug 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Recovery Plan was originally
drafted by the Hawaiian Monk Seal
Recovery Team at the request of the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries.
The Recovery Team includes experts on
marine mammals from the private
sector, academia, and government, as
well as experts on endangered species
conservation. NMFS released the draft
Recovery Plan and requested comments
from the public on November 28, 2006
(71 FR 68801). A summary of comments
and NMFS responses to comments are
available electronically (see ADDRESSES).
Concurrent with the public comment
period, NMFS requested comments from
four independent peer-reviewers.
The final Recovery Plan contains: (1)
a comprehensive review of the
Hawaiian monk seal population
distribution, life history, and habitat
use, (2) a threats assessment, (3)
conservation efforts, (4) biological and
recovery criteria for downlisting and
delisting, (5) actions necessary for the
recovery of the species, (6) an
implementation schedule, and (7)
estimates of time and cost to recovery.
The threats assessment includes three
levels of threats: (1) Crucial (ongoing
and apparent threat at most sites in the
NWHI), (2) Serious (potential cause of
localized threats), and (3) Moderate
(localized impacts possible but not
considered a serious or immediate
threat). The crucial threats to Hawaiian
monk seals are: food limitation,
entanglement, and shark predation. The
serious threats to Hawaiian monk seals
are: infectious disease, habitat loss,
fishery interaction, male aggression, and
human interaction. Finally, the
moderate threats to Hawaiian monk
seals are: biotoxins, vessel groundings
and contaminants.
Criteria for the reclassification of the
Hawaiian monk seal are included in the
final Recovery Plan. In summary,
Hawaiian monk seals may be
reclassified from endangered to
threatened when all of the following
have been met: (1) aggregate numbers
exceed 2,900 total individuals in the
NWHI; (2) at least 5 of the 6 main subpopulation in the NWHI are above 100
individuals, and the MHI population is
above 500; (3) the survivorship of
females in each subpopulation in the
NWHI and in the MHI is high enough
that, in conjunction with the birth rates
in each subpopulation, the calculated
population growth rate for each
subpopulation is not negative. The
population will be considered for a
delisting if the downlisting criteria
continue to be met for 20 consecutive
years without new crucial or serious
threats being identified. Time and cost
for recovery actions are contained in the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46967
final Recovery Plan. The recovery
program will cost $35,915,000 for the
first five fiscal years and $378,425,000
to full recovery assuming the best case
scenario that the population could grow
to the stipulated total population size in
the NWHI within 12 years and that the
stipulated numbers in the MHI could be
reached within 34 years.
In accordance with the 2003 Peer
Review Policy as stated in Appendix R
of the Interim Endangered and
Threatened Species Recovery Planning
Guidance, NMFS solicited independent
peer-review on the draft Plan concurrent
with the public comment period.
Independent peer-reviews were
requested from four scientists and
managers with expertise in recovery
planning, statistical analyses, fisheries,
and marine mammals. Many of the
recommendations that were made by the
reviewers were addressed and provided
in detail in the final plan.
5-year Review Background
Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires
that NMFS conduct a review of listed
species at least once every five years. On
the basis of such reviews under section
4(c)(2)(B), NMFS will determine
whether or not any species should be
removed from the list (delisted), or
reclassified from endangered to
threatened or from threatened to
endangered. Delisting a species must be
supported by the best scientific and
commercial data available and only
considered if such data substantiates
that the species is neither endangered
nor threatened for one or more of the
following reasons: (1) the species is
considered extinct; (2) the species is
considered to be recovered; and/or (3)
the original data available when the
species was listed, or the interpretation
of such data, were in error. Any change
in Federal classification would require a
separate rulemaking process.
The 5-year review considered the best
scientific and commercial data and all
new information that has become
available since the listing determination
or most recent status review. Categories
of information include (A) species
biology including, but not limited to,
population trends, distribution,
abundance, demographics, and genetics;
(B) habitat conditions including, but not
limited to, amount, distribution, and
suitability; (C) conservation measures
that have been implemented that benefit
the species; (D) status and trends of
threats; and (E) other new information,
data, or corrections including, but not
limited to, taxonomic or nomenclatural
changes, identification of erroneous
information contained in the List, and
improved analytical methods. NMFS
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
46968
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices
concluded that the status of the
Hawaiian monk seal remains
‘‘endangered’’.
NMFS announced the initiation of the
5-year review and requested information
from the public on January 22, 2007 (72
FR 2650). Information was received
from the Ocean Conservancy and the
Marine Mammal Commission.
Conclusion
NMFS revised the final Recovery Plan
for the Hawaiian Monk Seal and
evaluated all comments received by the
public as well as independent peerreviewers. NMFS has also completed
the first 5-year review for the Hawaiian
Monk Seal based on public comments
received and internal review. NMFS
concludes that both the Recovery Plan
and the 5-year review meet the
requirements of the ESA.
Dated: August 16, 2007.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–16600 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
Dated: August 16, 2007.
James Hyler,
Acting Leader, Information Management Case
Services Team, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
SUMMARY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Student Aid
Department of Education.
The Acting Leader,
Information Management Case Services
Team, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, invites comments on the
proposed information collection
requests as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before October
22, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Acting
Leader, Information Management Case
Services Team, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Aug 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Federal Perkins Loan Program
Regulations.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: Not-for-profit
institutions (primary), Individuals or
households, Businesses or other forprofit.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 2,800,642.
Burden Hours: 61,879.
Abstract: Institutions of higher
education make Perkins loans.
Information is necessary in order to
monitor a school’s reimbursement to its
Perkins loan revolving fund, monitor
how collection costs are charged to
borrowers on rehabilitated loans and to
monitor the assignment of defaulted
Perkins loans to the Department.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 3448. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–16578 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services (OSERS);
Overview Information; National
Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)—
Small Business Innovative Research
Program (SBIR)—Phase I Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.133S–1.)
Dates: Applications Available: August
22, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: October 22, 2007.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program
The purpose of this program is to
stimulate technological innovation in
the private sector, strengthen the role of
small business in meeting Federal
research or research and development
(R/R&D) needs, increase the commercial
application of the U.S. Department of
Education (Department) supported
research results, and improve the return
on investment from federally funded
research for economic and social
benefits to the Nation.
Note: This program is in concert with
President George W. Bush’s New Freedom
Initiative (NFI) and NIDRR’s Final LongRange Plan for FY 2005–2009 (Plan). The NFI
can be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.whitehouse.gov/
infocus/newfreedom.
The Plan, which was published in the
Federal Register on February 15, 2006 (71 FR
Doc 8166), can be accessed on the Internet at
the following site: https://www.ed.gov/about/
offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
NFI and the Plan, NIDRR seeks to (1)
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46966-46968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XB42
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; recovery plan and 5-year review for the
Hawaiian monk seal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
adoption of an Endangered Species Act (ESA) Recovery Plan (Recovery
Plan) and 5-year review for the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus
schauinslandi). The Recovery Plan contains revisions and additions in
consideration of public comments on the proposed draft Recovery Plan
for the Hawaiian Monk Seal. This is the first 5-year review completed
for the Hawaiian monk seal.
ADDRESSES: Additional information about the Recovery Plan and 5-year
review may be obtained by writing to Dr. Michelle Yuen, National Marine
Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Protected Resources
Division, 1601 Kapiolani Boulevard Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI, 96814 or
send an electronic message to michelle.yuen@noaa.gov.
[[Page 46967]]
Electronic copies of the Recovery Plan, the 5-year review, and a
summary of NMFS's response to public comments on the Recovery Plan are
available online at the NMFS Office of Protected Resources website:
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/pinnipeds/hawaiianmonkseal.htm
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Yuen (808-944-2243), e-mail:
michelle.yuen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Recovery Plan Background
Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species listed under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The ESA
requires that recovery plans incorporate (1) objective, measurable
criteria that, when met, would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery actions.
The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for listed species
unless such a plan would not promote the recovery of a particular
species. NMFS's goal is to restore the endangered Hawaiian monk seal
population to the point where they are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystem and no longer need the protections of the
ESA.
The Hawaiian monk seal has the distinction of being the only
endangered marine mammal species whose entire range, historical and
current, lies within the United States of America. The majority of the
population of Hawaiian monk seals now occupies the northwestern
Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) with six main breeding sub-populations. The
species is also found in lower numbers in the main Hawaiian Islands
(MHI), where the population size and range both appear to be expanding.
The Hawaiian monk seal was listed as an endangered species under the
ESA on November 23, 1976 (41 FR 51611). On April 30, 1986 (51 FR
16047), critical habitat was designated at all beach areas, lagoon
waters, and ocean waters out to a depth of 10 fathoms around Kure
Atoll, Midway, Pearl and Hermes Reef, Lisianski Island, Laysan Island,
Gardner Pinnacles, French Frigate Shoals, Necker Island and Nihoa
Island; critical habitat was extended to include Maro Reef and waters
around all habitat out to the 20 fathom isobath on May 26, 1988. The
best estimate of the total population size in 2006 is 1,202 seals.
The Recovery Plan was originally drafted by the Hawaiian Monk Seal
Recovery Team at the request of the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries. The Recovery Team includes experts on marine mammals from
the private sector, academia, and government, as well as experts on
endangered species conservation. NMFS released the draft Recovery Plan
and requested comments from the public on November 28, 2006 (71 FR
68801). A summary of comments and NMFS responses to comments are
available electronically (see ADDRESSES). Concurrent with the public
comment period, NMFS requested comments from four independent peer-
reviewers.
The final Recovery Plan contains: (1) a comprehensive review of the
Hawaiian monk seal population distribution, life history, and habitat
use, (2) a threats assessment, (3) conservation efforts, (4) biological
and recovery criteria for downlisting and delisting, (5) actions
necessary for the recovery of the species, (6) an implementation
schedule, and (7) estimates of time and cost to recovery. The threats
assessment includes three levels of threats: (1) Crucial (ongoing and
apparent threat at most sites in the NWHI), (2) Serious (potential
cause of localized threats), and (3) Moderate (localized impacts
possible but not considered a serious or immediate threat). The crucial
threats to Hawaiian monk seals are: food limitation, entanglement, and
shark predation. The serious threats to Hawaiian monk seals are:
infectious disease, habitat loss, fishery interaction, male aggression,
and human interaction. Finally, the moderate threats to Hawaiian monk
seals are: biotoxins, vessel groundings and contaminants.
Criteria for the reclassification of the Hawaiian monk seal are
included in the final Recovery Plan. In summary, Hawaiian monk seals
may be reclassified from endangered to threatened when all of the
following have been met: (1) aggregate numbers exceed 2,900 total
individuals in the NWHI; (2) at least 5 of the 6 main sub-population in
the NWHI are above 100 individuals, and the MHI population is above
500; (3) the survivorship of females in each subpopulation in the NWHI
and in the MHI is high enough that, in conjunction with the birth rates
in each subpopulation, the calculated population growth rate for each
subpopulation is not negative. The population will be considered for a
delisting if the downlisting criteria continue to be met for 20
consecutive years without new crucial or serious threats being
identified. Time and cost for recovery actions are contained in the
final Recovery Plan. The recovery program will cost $35,915,000 for the
first five fiscal years and $378,425,000 to full recovery assuming the
best case scenario that the population could grow to the stipulated
total population size in the NWHI within 12 years and that the
stipulated numbers in the MHI could be reached within 34 years.
In accordance with the 2003 Peer Review Policy as stated in
Appendix R of the Interim Endangered and Threatened Species Recovery
Planning Guidance, NMFS solicited independent peer-review on the draft
Plan concurrent with the public comment period. Independent peer-
reviews were requested from four scientists and managers with expertise
in recovery planning, statistical analyses, fisheries, and marine
mammals. Many of the recommendations that were made by the reviewers
were addressed and provided in detail in the final plan.
5-year Review Background
Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires that NMFS conduct a review
of listed species at least once every five years. On the basis of such
reviews under section 4(c)(2)(B), NMFS will determine whether or not
any species should be removed from the list (delisted), or reclassified
from endangered to threatened or from threatened to endangered.
Delisting a species must be supported by the best scientific and
commercial data available and only considered if such data
substantiates that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons: (1) the species is considered
extinct; (2) the species is considered to be recovered; and/or (3) the
original data available when the species was listed, or the
interpretation of such data, were in error. Any change in Federal
classification would require a separate rulemaking process.
The 5-year review considered the best scientific and commercial
data and all new information that has become available since the
listing determination or most recent status review. Categories of
information include (A) species biology including, but not limited to,
population trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
(B) habitat conditions including, but not limited to, amount,
distribution, and suitability; (C) conservation measures that have been
implemented that benefit the species; (D) status and trends of threats;
and (E) other new information, data, or corrections including, but not
limited to, taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical
methods. NMFS
[[Page 46968]]
concluded that the status of the Hawaiian monk seal remains
``endangered''.
NMFS announced the initiation of the 5-year review and requested
information from the public on January 22, 2007 (72 FR 2650).
Information was received from the Ocean Conservancy and the Marine
Mammal Commission.
Conclusion
NMFS revised the final Recovery Plan for the Hawaiian Monk Seal and
evaluated all comments received by the public as well as independent
peer-reviewers. NMFS has also completed the first 5-year review for the
Hawaiian Monk Seal based on public comments received and internal
review. NMFS concludes that both the Recovery Plan and the 5-year
review meet the requirements of the ESA.
Dated: August 16, 2007.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-16600 Filed 8-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S