Energy Planning and Management Program; Integrated Resource Planning Approval Criteria, 46570-46572 [E7-16477]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
46570
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
NRC amend its regulations to allow the
use of decommissioning trust funds to
cover the costs of removing the MRCs
from the reactor.) Specifically, the
petitioner is requesting that 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(iii) through (a)(8)(iv) be
redesignated as 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(iv)
through (a)(8)(v), and that a new 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(iii) be added. The petitioner
proposes the new language read as
follows:
(iii) Notwithstanding the limitations of
§§ 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 8(ii), a licensee may
use decommissioning trust funds to dispose
of major radioactive components that have
been removed from the reactor provided:
A. The licensee has submitted to the NRC
with a copy to the Federal or State
government agency (e.g., Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission and State Public
Utility Commissions), if any, which has rate
regulation oversight responsibility for the
licensee’s decommissioning trust fund:
(1) A request to allow it to withdraw a
specified amount from its decommissioning
trust fund for the purpose of disposing of
specific major radioactive component(s);
(2) A site-specific decommissioning cost
estimate that includes the disposal costs for
major components stored on site; and
(3) An analysis demonstrating that if the
licensee withdraws funds for the costs of
disposing of the particular component(s)
from the decommissioning trust fund, the
remaining funds in the licensee’s
decommissioning trust fund are sufficient to
meet the provisions of §§ 50.82(a)(8)(i)(B) and
(C); and
B. The NRC has concluded that there is
reasonable assurance that the provisions of
§§ 50.82(a)(8)(B) and (C) will be met if the
licensee withdraws the funds requested
under § 50.82(a)(8)(iii)(A)(1).
The petitioner’s asserted justifications
for this amendment include:
(1) Reducing the radioactive source
term associated with the contaminated
components at reactor sites;
(2) Exposing site workers to less
radiation;
(3) Eliminating unnecessary
regulatory burdens by avoiding the costs
associated with both maintaining the
components on-site and providing
protection to workers as a result of
maintaining those components;
(4) Reducing the overall costs to
decommission sites; and
(5) Ensuring that more funds are
available to decommission reactors at
the time the reactors cease operation.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Conclusion
The petitioner concludes that it is in
the public interest to provide a
regulatory framework to allow funds
from licensees’ decommissioning trust
funds to be used for the cost of disposal
of MRCs that have been removed from
reactors prior to the permanent
cessation of operations. Accordingly,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Aug 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
the petitioner requests that the NRC
amend its regulations as described
previously in the section titled, ‘‘The
Proposed Amendments.’’
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of August 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–16476 Filed 8–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
10 CFR Part 905
RIN 1901–AB24
Energy Planning and Management
Program; Integrated Resource
Planning Approval Criteria
Western Area Power
Administration, Department of Energy
(DOE).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power
Administration (Western) is proposing
changes to current regulations that
require customers to prepare integrated
resource plans (IRP). Western is
proposing to facilitate public review of
customer IRPs by making them more
readily available, such as by posting
customer IRPs on Western’s external
Web site. Western is also proposing
language to encourage participation in
regional IRPs by customers who may not
be members of a member-based
association (MBA). Finally, Western
proposes to modify the requirement that
each member of an MBA approve the
IRP. Publication of this Federal Register
notice begins the formal process for the
proposed regulation revisions.
DATES: The comment period begins
today and will end November 19, 2007.
Western will present a detailed
explanation of the proposed revisions to
its current regulations and accept oral
and written comments at a joint public
information and public comment forum.
The public forum will be held on the
following date: September 6, 2007,
1 p.m. MDT, Denver, CO. Western will
accept written comments any time
during the comment period.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Ron Horstman, Energy Services
Specialist, Western Area Power
Administration, P.O. Box 281213,
Lakewood, CO 80228–8213. Comments
may be sent by fax to (720) 962–7427 or
by electronic mail to
horstman@wapa.gov. Western will post
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information about the public process on
its Web site at https://www.wapa.gov.
Western will post official comments
received via letter and e-mail to its Web
site after the close of the comment
period. Western must receive written
comments by the end of the comment
period to ensure they are considered in
Western’s decision process.
The public forum location will be the
Radisson Hotel Denver Stapleton Plaza,
3333 Quebec Street, Denver, Colorado
80207.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Project manager-Ron Horstman, (720)
962–7419, e-mail horstman@wapa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction and Discussion of
Proposal
Section 114 of the Energy Policy Act
of 1992 (EPAct), Public Law 102–486,
amended the Hoover Power Plant Act of
1984 (42 U.S.C. 7275–7276) to require
integrated resource planning by
Western’s customers. Western
implemented section 114 of EPAct
through completion of the Energy
Planning and Management Program
(Program) in October 1995. 60 FR 54151
(October 20, 1995). The Program was
revised in March of 2000 to allow
customers more alternatives in meeting
the IRP requirements. 65 FR 16789
(March 30, 2000). Western’s current
regulations are published in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 10 CFR part 905.
Western is proposing to revise its IRP
rule pursuant to 10 CFR 905.24, which
allows Western at appropriate intervals
to initiate a public process to review
and revise its regulations. Specifically,
Western is proposing to change its IRP
regulations in three respects. The first
proposed change is to the public
participation requirement under 10 CFR
905.11 (b)(4). Given the large number of
members of some MBAs and the
diversity of the member’s interests,
Western proposes to eliminate the
requirement that members of an MBA
unanimously approve the IRP (10 CFR
905.11(b)(4)(i) ). Instead, Western
proposes to require approval only by the
governing body of an MBA, which
serves the interests of each MBA
member through the member’s
representation on the MBA board.
Western is proposing no other changes
to the full public participation
requirement in section 905.11(b)(4).
Secondly, Western is proposing to
add a paragraph to section 905.12(b) to
encourage cooperation among customers
in the preparation of regional IRPs by
clarifying that such a regional approach
is acceptable, with advance approval by
Western, even if the participating
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
customers are not members of an MBA.
Collaboration on transmission projects
through a regional planning approach is
particularly appropriate.
Finally, consistent with the
requirement for full public participation
in the preparation, development,
revision or amendment of an IRP,
Western proposes to make current
customer IRPs more readily available to
the public, such as by posting such
documents on Western’s external Web
site. Customers may continue to request
confidential treatment of sensitive
information covered by an exemption in
the Freedom of Information Act when
the IRP is filed with Western. If Western
agrees, the sensitive information will be
redacted and not released. This proposal
is in response to feedback from
interested parties that IRPs prepared by
Western’s customers are more difficult
to obtain than investor-owned utility
IRPs. Western is proposing to clarify its
ability to release customer IRPs in
section 905.23.
II. Procedural and Regulatory Review
Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
Western has an exemption from
centralized regulatory review under
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ 58 FR 51735
(October 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
notice of proposed rulemaking was not
reviewed by OMB under the Executive
Order.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) requires Federal
agencies to perform a regulatory
flexibility analysis if a final rule is likely
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
and there is a legal requirement to issue
a general notice of proposed
rulemaking. The proposed rule would
make a change to the process of
approving IRPs; encourage cooperation
among customers by clarifying that a
regional approach including nonmembers may be approved by Western;
and provide for making customer IRPs
more readily available to the public,
such as by posting on Western’s Web
site. Western is proposing no new
substantive requirements, and the
proposed rule, if promulgated as a final
rule, would not have a significant
economic impact on any entity. On this
basis, Western’s Administrator has
certified that the proposed rule would
have no significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Aug 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act
No new information or record keeping
requirements are imposed by this
rulemaking. Accordingly, no OMB
clearance is required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508); and DOE NEPA
Implementing Procedures and
Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021), Western
has determined this action is
categorically excluded from preparing
an environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement. This
rulemaking would amend an existing
regulation without changing the
environmental effect of the regulation
being amended and, therefore, is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion
in paragraph A5 to subpart D, 10 CFR
part 1021. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
(64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and carefully assess the necessity
for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an
accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy
describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations (65 FR
13735). Western has examined today’s
proposed rule and has determined that
it does not preempt State law and does
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. No further action
is required by Executive Order 13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46571
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform’’ (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and
(3) provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard and promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Federal agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Federal agencies to
determine whether the regulations meet
the applicable standards in section 3(a)
and section 3(b), or it is unreasonable to
meet one or more of them. Western has
completed the required review and
determined that, to the extent permitted
by law, this proposed rule meets the
relevant standards of Executive Order
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to assess
the effects of a Federal regulatory action
on State, local, and tribal governments,
and the private sector. Western has
determined that today’s regulatory
action does not impose a Federal
mandate on State, local or tribal
governments or on the private sector.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
proposed rule would not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution.
Accordingly, Western has concluded
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
46572
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
that it is not necessary to prepare a
Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). OMB’s guidelines were
published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22,
2002), and DOE’s guidelines were
published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7,
2002). Western has reviewed today’s
notice under the OMB and DOE
guidelines and has concluded that it is
consistent with applicable policies in
those guidelines.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA), Office of Management and
Budget, a Statement of Energy Effects for
any proposed significant energy action.
A ‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined
as: (1) Any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule; (2) is a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor
order; and (3) is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, or is
designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
Today’s regulatory action is not a
significant energy action. Accordingly,
Western has not prepared a Statement of
Energy Effects.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Interested persons are invited to
participate by submitting data, views, or
arguments with respect to the proposed
amendments to part 905 set forth in this
notice. Written comments should be
submitted to the address indicated in
the ADDRESSES section of this notice. All
brochures, studies, comments, letters,
memorandums, or other documents that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Aug 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
Western initiates or uses to develop the
proposed regulation revisions are
available for inspection and copying at
Western’s Corporate Services Office in
Lakewood, Colorado. Many of these
documents and supporting information
are also available on Western’s Web site
located at https://www.wapa.gov.
Any information that a commenter
considers to be confidential must be so
identified and submitted in writing, one
copy only. Western reserves the right to
determine the appropriateness of
confidential status for the information
and to treat it in accordance with its
determination.
IV. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
the publication of today’s proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 905
Electric power, Electric utilities,
Energy, Energy conservation,
Hydroelectric power and utilities,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 6, 2007.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
PART 905—ENERGY PLANNING AND
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
1. The authority citation is revised to
read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7152, 7191; 42 U.S.C.
7275–7276c.
[Amended]
2. Section 905.11(b)(4)(i) is amended
by removing ‘‘and each MBA member
(such as a board of directors or city
council)’’; and by removing ‘‘included
or referred to in the IRP’’.
3. Section 905.12 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:
§ 905.12
How must IRPs be submitted?
(b) * * *
(4) Customers may work together to
develop and submit regional IRPs.
Customers who wish to submit regional
IRPs must first obtain approval by
Western to do so. Regional IRPs must be
approved individually by each
participating customer prior to
submittal of the IRP to Western.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 905.23 is revised to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
IRPs, small customer plans, minimum
investment reports, public benefits
reports, and EE/RE reports and
associated data submitted to Western
are subject to the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) and may be
made available to the public upon
request. Customers may request
confidential treatment of all or part of a
submitted document under applicable
FOIA exemptions. Western’s FOIA
Officer will make his/her own
determination whether particular
information is exempt from public
access. Western will not disclose to the
public information it has determined to
be exempt from disclosure under FOIA.
Western will make customer IRPs
available to the public, such as through
posting them on Western’s external Web
site, subject to the same confidentiality
determinations made in response to
FOIA requests.
[FR Doc. E7–16477 Filed 8–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
For the reasons set forth in the
supplementary information section, 10
CFR part 905 is proposed to be amended
as set forth below.
§ 905.11
§ 905.23 What are the opportunities for
using the Freedom of Information Act to
request data?
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29030; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–284–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Model F.28 Mark 0070, 0100, 1000,
2000, 3000, and 4000 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel
Tank System explosions in flight * * * and
on ground, * * * Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88 (SFAR88) * * * required a
safety review of the aircraft Fuel Tank
System * * *.
*
*
*
*
*
Fuel Airworthiness Limitations are items
arising from a systems safety analysis that
have been shown to have failure mode(s)
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 21, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46570-46572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16477]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
10 CFR Part 905
RIN 1901-AB24
Energy Planning and Management Program; Integrated Resource
Planning Approval Criteria
AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, Department of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power Administration (Western) is proposing
changes to current regulations that require customers to prepare
integrated resource plans (IRP). Western is proposing to facilitate
public review of customer IRPs by making them more readily available,
such as by posting customer IRPs on Western's external Web site.
Western is also proposing language to encourage participation in
regional IRPs by customers who may not be members of a member-based
association (MBA). Finally, Western proposes to modify the requirement
that each member of an MBA approve the IRP. Publication of this Federal
Register notice begins the formal process for the proposed regulation
revisions.
DATES: The comment period begins today and will end November 19, 2007.
Western will present a detailed explanation of the proposed revisions
to its current regulations and accept oral and written comments at a
joint public information and public comment forum. The public forum
will be held on the following date: September 6, 2007, 1 p.m. MDT,
Denver, CO. Western will accept written comments any time during the
comment period.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Ron Horstman, Energy Services
Specialist, Western Area Power Administration, P.O. Box 281213,
Lakewood, CO 80228-8213. Comments may be sent by fax to (720) 962-7427
or by electronic mail to horstman@wapa.gov. Western will post
information about the public process on its Web site at https://
www.wapa.gov. Western will post official comments received via letter
and e-mail to its Web site after the close of the comment period.
Western must receive written comments by the end of the comment period
to ensure they are considered in Western's decision process.
The public forum location will be the Radisson Hotel Denver
Stapleton Plaza, 3333 Quebec Street, Denver, Colorado 80207.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Project manager-Ron Horstman, (720)
962-7419, e-mail horstman@wapa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction and Discussion of Proposal
Section 114 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct), Public Law
102-486, amended the Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 7275-
7276) to require integrated resource planning by Western's customers.
Western implemented section 114 of EPAct through completion of the
Energy Planning and Management Program (Program) in October 1995. 60 FR
54151 (October 20, 1995). The Program was revised in March of 2000 to
allow customers more alternatives in meeting the IRP requirements. 65
FR 16789 (March 30, 2000). Western's current regulations are published
in the Code of Federal Regulations at 10 CFR part 905.
Western is proposing to revise its IRP rule pursuant to 10 CFR
905.24, which allows Western at appropriate intervals to initiate a
public process to review and revise its regulations. Specifically,
Western is proposing to change its IRP regulations in three respects.
The first proposed change is to the public participation requirement
under 10 CFR 905.11 (b)(4). Given the large number of members of some
MBAs and the diversity of the member's interests, Western proposes to
eliminate the requirement that members of an MBA unanimously approve
the IRP (10 CFR 905.11(b)(4)(i) ). Instead, Western proposes to require
approval only by the governing body of an MBA, which serves the
interests of each MBA member through the member's representation on the
MBA board. Western is proposing no other changes to the full public
participation requirement in section 905.11(b)(4).
Secondly, Western is proposing to add a paragraph to section
905.12(b) to encourage cooperation among customers in the preparation
of regional IRPs by clarifying that such a regional approach is
acceptable, with advance approval by Western, even if the participating
[[Page 46571]]
customers are not members of an MBA. Collaboration on transmission
projects through a regional planning approach is particularly
appropriate.
Finally, consistent with the requirement for full public
participation in the preparation, development, revision or amendment of
an IRP, Western proposes to make current customer IRPs more readily
available to the public, such as by posting such documents on Western's
external Web site. Customers may continue to request confidential
treatment of sensitive information covered by an exemption in the
Freedom of Information Act when the IRP is filed with Western. If
Western agrees, the sensitive information will be redacted and not
released. This proposal is in response to feedback from interested
parties that IRPs prepared by Western's customers are more difficult to
obtain than investor-owned utility IRPs. Western is proposing to
clarify its ability to release customer IRPs in section 905.23.
II. Procedural and Regulatory Review Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
Western has an exemption from centralized regulatory review under
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735
(October 4, 1993). Accordingly, this notice of proposed rulemaking was
not reviewed by OMB under the Executive Order.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.)
requires Federal agencies to perform a regulatory flexibility analysis
if a final rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and there is a legal requirement
to issue a general notice of proposed rulemaking. The proposed rule
would make a change to the process of approving IRPs; encourage
cooperation among customers by clarifying that a regional approach
including non-members may be approved by Western; and provide for
making customer IRPs more readily available to the public, such as by
posting on Western's Web site. Western is proposing no new substantive
requirements, and the proposed rule, if promulgated as a final rule,
would not have a significant economic impact on any entity. On this
basis, Western's Administrator has certified that the proposed rule
would have no significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
No new information or record keeping requirements are imposed by
this rulemaking. Accordingly, no OMB clearance is required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); and DOE
NEPA Implementing Procedures and Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021), Western
has determined this action is categorically excluded from preparing an
environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement. This
rulemaking would amend an existing regulation without changing the
environmental effect of the regulation being amended and, therefore, is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion in paragraph A5 to subpart D,
10 CFR part 1021. Accordingly, neither an environmental assessment nor
an environmental impact statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 4,
1999), imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have federalism implications. Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations (65 FR 13735). Western has examined today's proposed rule
and has determined that it does not preempt State law and does not have
a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform'' (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), imposes on
Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard and
promote simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive
Order 12988 specifically requires that Federal agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard
for affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the
Attorney General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Federal agencies to determine whether the regulations meet the
applicable standards in section 3(a) and section 3(b), or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of them. Western has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
this proposed rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of a Federal
regulatory action on State, local, and tribal governments, and the
private sector. Western has determined that today's regulatory action
does not impose a Federal mandate on State, local or tribal governments
or on the private sector.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This proposed rule would not have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, Western has
concluded
[[Page 46572]]
that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under guidelines established by each
agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). Western has reviewed today's notice under the
OMB and DOE guidelines and has concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit
to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of
Management and Budget, a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed
significant energy action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined
as: (1) Any action by an agency that promulgated or is expected to lead
to promulgation of a final rule; (2) is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (3) is likely
to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or
use of energy, or is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use. Today's regulatory
action is not a significant energy action. Accordingly, Western has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Interested persons are invited to participate by submitting data,
views, or arguments with respect to the proposed amendments to part 905
set forth in this notice. Written comments should be submitted to the
address indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. All
brochures, studies, comments, letters, memorandums, or other documents
that Western initiates or uses to develop the proposed regulation
revisions are available for inspection and copying at Western's
Corporate Services Office in Lakewood, Colorado. Many of these
documents and supporting information are also available on Western's
Web site located at https://www.wapa.gov.
Any information that a commenter considers to be confidential must
be so identified and submitted in writing, one copy only. Western
reserves the right to determine the appropriateness of confidential
status for the information and to treat it in accordance with its
determination.
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved the publication of today's
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 905
Electric power, Electric utilities, Energy, Energy conservation,
Hydroelectric power and utilities, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 6, 2007.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the supplementary information section,
10 CFR part 905 is proposed to be amended as set forth below.
PART 905--ENERGY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
1. The authority citation is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7152, 7191; 42 U.S.C. 7275-7276c.
Sec. 905.11 [Amended]
2. Section 905.11(b)(4)(i) is amended by removing ``and each MBA
member (such as a board of directors or city council)''; and by
removing ``included or referred to in the IRP''.
3. Section 905.12 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 905.12 How must IRPs be submitted?
(b) * * *
(4) Customers may work together to develop and submit regional
IRPs. Customers who wish to submit regional IRPs must first obtain
approval by Western to do so. Regional IRPs must be approved
individually by each participating customer prior to submittal of the
IRP to Western.
* * * * *
4. Section 905.23 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 905.23 What are the opportunities for using the Freedom of
Information Act to request data?
IRPs, small customer plans, minimum investment reports, public
benefits reports, and EE/RE reports and associated data submitted to
Western are subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be
made available to the public upon request. Customers may request
confidential treatment of all or part of a submitted document under
applicable FOIA exemptions. Western's FOIA Officer will make his/her
own determination whether particular information is exempt from public
access. Western will not disclose to the public information it has
determined to be exempt from disclosure under FOIA. Western will make
customer IRPs available to the public, such as through posting them on
Western's external Web site, subject to the same confidentiality
determinations made in response to FOIA requests.
[FR Doc. E7-16477 Filed 8-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
