Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 46615-46617 [E7-16386]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 21, 2007 / Notices
providers. The information collected
through the surveys will be used to
determine how the Government buying
activities can most effectively use
reverse auctions as a tool to support
Government requiring activities and
ensure that the U.S. taxpayer is best
served. To view the two draft surveys
entitled, Online Procurement Services—
Government and Industry Outreach
Feedback and Online Procurement
Services—Reverse Auction Service
Providers Outreach Feedback, visit
https://www.acquisition.gov.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Title: Online Procurement Services—
Government and Industry Outreach
Feedback; and Online Procurement
Services—Reverse Auction Service Providers
Outreach Feedback.
OMB Number: Not Yet Assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection of
information.
Abstract: The purpose of these two onetime surveys are to determine how
Government buying activities can most
effectively use reverse auctions as a tool to
support Government requiring activities and
to ensure the U.S. taxpayer is best served.
Affected Public: Two respondent groups
are identified and will receive similar
surveys on Online Procurement Services:
Government and industry buying activities;
and reverse auction service providers.
However, for the purposes of this collection
we are counting the industry buying
activities and reverse auction service
providers.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 580 (not to exceed
1000).
Responses Per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 580 (not to exceed
1000).
Hours Per Response: 0.50.
Total Burden Hours: 290.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
approximately 580 and not expected to
exceed 1000. The estimated number of
industry respondents to the Government
and Industry Buying Activities Survey
is 550. The estimated number of
industry respondents to the Reverse
Auction Survey is 30 based on the
Government’s latest market research.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1 per company. The
number of responses per respondent is
one for each of the two surveys. Each
respondent will only be required to
complete one survey once. Estimated
Total Annual Responses: approximately
580 and not expected to exceed 1000
(580 x 1). Estimated Time per Response:
30 minutes (0.50 hours). The estimated
average time for industry to respond to
Government and Industry Buying
Activity Survey is approximately 15
minutes (0.25 hours), based on a pre-test
of the draft instrument by Government
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Aug 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
employees. The data collection
instrument for the Reverse Auction
Service Providers Survey was pre-tested
on a support contractor, a related
business sector. The Reverse Auction
Service Providers Survey instrument is
similar to the Government and Industry
Buying Activity Survey; therefore, the
pre-test results for the Government and
Industry Buying Activity Survey are
used to estimate average response time
for the Reverse Auction Service
Providers Survey, which is 15 minutes
(0.25 hours). Estimated Total Annual
Burden on Respondents: 290 hours (580
x 0.50).
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
C. Annual Review Burden and Cost
Responses: 580.
Review Time Per Response: .45.
Total Burden Hours: 261.
Cost Per Hour: $45.00.
Total Cost: $11,745.00.
OBTAINING COPIES OF
PROPOSALS: Requesters may obtain a
copy of the information collection
documents from the General Services
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VIR),
Room 4035, 1800 F. Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20405, telephone (202)
501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No.
9000–00XX, Online Procurement
Services—Industry Outreach Feedback
Survey and Online.
Dated: August 14, 2007.
Al Matera,
Director, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 07–4065; Filed 8–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[IC07–80–001, FERC Form 80]
Commission Information Collection
Activities, Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
August 14, 2007.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission)
has submitted the information
collection described below to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46615
review and reinstatement of this
information collection requirement. Any
interested person may file comments
directly with OMB and should address
a copy of those comments to the
Commission as explained below. The
Commission received comments from
two commenters in response to an
earlier Federal Register notice of April
16, 2007 (72 FR 18967–68) and has
responded to those comments in the
justification that it is submitting to
OMB. Copies of this submission were
also sent to the commenters.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due by September 21,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the
collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. Comments to
OMB should be filed electronically, c/o
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov and
include the OMB Control No. as a point
of reference. The Desk Officer may be
reached by telephone at 202–395–7345.
A copy of the comments should also be
sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Office of the Executive
Director, ED–34, Attention: Michael
Miller, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Comments may
be filed either in paper format or
electronically. Those persons filing
electronically do not need to make a
paper filing. For paper filings an
original and 14 copies of such
comments should be submitted to the
Secretary of the Commission, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426
and should refer to Docket No. IC07–80–
001.
Documents filed electronically via the
Internet must be prepared in
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable
Document Format, or ASCII format. To
file the document, access the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov and click on ‘‘Make an EFiling,’’ and then follow the instructions
for each screen. First time users will
have to establish a user name and
password. The Commission will send an
automatic acknowledgement to the
sender’s e-mail address upon receipt of
comments. User assistance for electronic
filings is available at 202–502–8258 or
by e-mail to efiling@ferc.gov. Comments
should not be submitted to this e-mail
address.
All comments may be viewed, printed
or downloaded remotely via the Internet
through FERC’s homepage using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
46616
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 21, 2007 / Notices
the docket number field to access the
document. For user assistance, contact
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866) 208–3676 or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at (202) 502–8415, by fax at
(202) 273–0873, and by e-mail at
michael.miller@ferc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Description
The information collection submitted
for OMB review contains the following:
1. Collection of Information: FERC
Form 80 ‘‘Licensed Hydropower
Development Recreation Report’’.
2. Sponsor: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
3. Control No. 1902–0106.
The Commission is now requesting
that OMB approve and reinstate the
information collection for an additional
three years.
The FERC Form 80 has been revised
to facilitate greater ease to respondents
in providing the information. As
initially proposed, FERC Form 80 was
updated to eliminate data concerning
the nearest city and population, since
FERC staff can access the information
from other sources. Second, FERC staff
has clarified the definitions so
respondents have a better understanding
of the information to be provided.
Third, resource data has been updated
to include FERC approved recreational
sites. Fourth, a new field has been
added so that respondents can identify
the method used for collecting the data.
In response to the 60-Day Notice of
April 16, 2007, commenters proposed
additional changes to the FERC Form
80. Specifically, commenters requested
the following changes to the collection:
(a) To exclude recreational facilities
that are not owned by the licensee even
if they are within the project boundary;
(b) To change the report cycle from
every six years to seven to 12 years;
(c) To add a trail count as a means to
gauge recreation facility occupancy;
(d) To add attendance records as a
means to estimate use and facility
occupancy;
(e) To clarify in the instructions the
types of recreation visits to include both
public and private facilities;
(f) To clarify wildlife and hunting
areas so that it’s clear whether acres or
areas are to be reported;
(g) To define the terms ‘‘commercial’’
and ‘‘private’’ use facilities;
(h) To report picnic sites and
commercial boat mooring areas as two
separate recreational resources; and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Aug 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
(i) To eliminate recreational resources
that occurs infrequently, such as golf
courses and playground facilities.
Additionally, commentors have
questioned the need for the following
data elements in the information
collection:
(a) Whether FERC approved facilities
should include third party resources
within the project boundary that must
be approved under the standard land
use article;
(b) Whether total miles/acres of
recreation areas are necessary;
(c) Whether informal/dispersed camp
sites should be included; and
(d) Whether organizational camping
areas within the project boundary
should be included.
Both commentors questioned the
Commission’s estimate of 3 hours to
complete the information collection.
Commission Proposal
The Commission proposes to adopt
the following recommendations: A trail
count as a means to gauge recreation
facility occupancy and the addition of
attendance records as a means to
estimate use and facility occupancy.
With regard to the other
recommendations, the Commission will
not adopt them for the following
reasons:
(a) The exclusion of recreational
facilities that are not owned by the
licensee even though they may be
within the project boundary.
The goal of the Commission’s policy
on recreation is to develop the project
area in a comprehensive manner.
Therefore the data collection is designed
to include information on all
recreational facilities located within the
project boundary, including those
provided by other federal, state, and
local agencies. Title 18 CFR Part 2.7
encourages licensees to cooperate with
other entities to provide recreation
opportunities. This cooperation and
comprehensive approach to providing
recreational access at licensed projects
not only provides a better recreation
experience, but also addresses impacts
to environmental resources in the area
by not overlapping an area. The
proposed revision to the Form 80
includes a column that identifies which
facilities are parts of an approved
recreation plan for the project as
opposed to those controlled by another
entity.
(b) Change the reporting cycle from
every six years to seven to twelve years.
The FERC Form 80s are collected every
6 years to ensure that recreation
facilities are meeting the needs of the
public. The Form 80’s are used on a
regular basis as a tool to evaluate
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
recreation at the projects and the
Commission believes 6 years is an
appropriate period of time to monitor
use.
(c) To clarify in the instructions the
types of recreation visits to include both
public and private facilities.
The recreation visits should include
all recreation days at projects at
approved facilities, facilities provided
by other entities, and general access
areas. It does not include visits to
private or residential docks or to
facilities outside the project boundary.
(d) To clarify wildlife and hunting
areas so that it’s clear whether acres or
areas are to be reported.
These are areas within the FERC
project boundary that can be used for
wildlife viewing and hunting.
(e) To define the terms ‘‘commercial’’
and ‘‘private’’ use facilities. The
Commission does not distinguish
between private and commercial
recreation facilities.
(f) To report picnic sites and
commercial boat mooring areas as two
separate recreational resources.
We do not believe these types of
resources need to be reported
separately. If necessary during a project
specific review, we will request these
types of details from the licensee.
(g) To eliminate recreational resources
that occurs infrequently, such as golf
courses and playground facilities.
We have eliminated or combined
some facilities over previous Form 80s.
We believe the facilities currently
reported on the Form 80 are
representative of all recreational
opportunities currently available at
hydropower projects. For example, golf
courses are an important recreational
feature at projects throughout the
southeast.
In response to commenters’ concerns
of whether the following information
was necessary on the FERC Form 80, we
provide the following:
(a) Whether FERC approved facilities
should include third party resources
within the project boundary that must
be approved under the standard land
use article.
FERC Approved Resources means
those facilities that are required in an
approved recreation plan or subsequent
amendments or those identified in an
Exhibit E filed with the license and
approved. It does not include facilities
approved as non-project uses of project
lands and water.
(b) Whether total miles/acres of
recreation areas are necessary.
We use total miles/acres to determine
the need for additional facilities.
(c) Whether informal/dispersed camp
sites should be included.
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 21, 2007 / Notices
Informal/dispersed camping can be
included in access areas.
(d) Whether organizational camping
areas within the project boundary
should be included.
All recreation areas should be
reported, not just public recreation.
(e) Underestimation of the reporting
burden. Both commenters believe the
Commission has underestimated the
amount of time it takes to complete the
Form 80 (3 hours).
The Commission’s estimate of the
time to complete the Form 80s is an
average of its licensees ranging from
large complicated projects with
extensive recreation to smaller less
developed projects. In an effort to
minimize the burden to licensees, we
have eliminated some data fields where
the information may be readily available
from other sources. Data collection can
take place in conjunction with other
required monitoring or with other
activities at the project such as water
quality or dissolved oxygen sampling or
general maintenance of the facilities.
4. Necessity of the Collection of
Information: Submission of the
information is necessary for the
Commission to carry out its
responsibilities in implementing the
statutory provisions of the sections 4(a),
10(a), 301(a), 304 and 309 of the Federal
Power Act (FPA). The authority for the
Commission to collect this information
comes from Section 10(a) of the FPA
which requires the Commission to be
responsible for ensuring those hydro
projects subjects to its jurisdiction are
consistent with the comprehensive
development of the nation’s waterway
for recreation and other beneficial
public uses.
In the interest of fulfilling these
objectives, the Commission expects
licensees subject to its jurisdiction, to
recognize the resources that are affected
by their activities and to play a role in
protecting such resources. The
information filed with the Commission
is mandatory.
5. Respondent Description: The
respondent universe currently
comprises 400 entities (on average)
subject to the Commission’s
jurisdiction.
6. Estimated Burden: 1,200 total
hours, 400 respondents (average), 1
response per respondent, and 3 hours
per response (rounded off and average
time).
7. Estimated Cost Burden to
respondents: 1,200 hours/2080 hours
per years × $122,137 per year = $70,464.
The cost per respondent is equal to $176
(rounded off).
Statutory Authority: Statutory provisions
of sections 4(a), 10(a), 301(a), 304 and 309 of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Aug 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 797, 803,
825c and 825h.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–16386 Filed 8–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP07–430–000]
Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas
Transmission LLC; Notice of Filing
August 14, 2007.
Take notice that on August 6, 2007,
Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas
Transmission LLC (Kinder Morgan)
whose mailing address is P.O. Box
281304, Lakewood, Colorado 80228–
8304, filed an application, pursuant to
section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA), and Part 157 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s
Regulations, requesting a certificate of
public convenience and necessity
authorizing the construction and
operation of certain facilities referred to
as the Colorado Lateral Expansion
Project located in Weld County,
Colorado (Project). The facilities for the
Project are designed to deliver up to
55,000 Dth per day. The application is
on file with the Commission and open
for public inspection. This filing is
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
The Project will comprise delivery
meter stations and approximately 41.4
miles of 12-inch pipeline facilities
extending from the Cheyenne to Greeley
in Weld County, Colorado. The facilities
are proposed in order to provide
incremental firm transportation service
to Atmos Energy Corporation (Atmos).
Kinder Morgan has entered into a
Precedent Agreement with Atmos for a
primary term of ten years an initial
volume of 47,000 Dth/day stepping-up
to 55,000 Dth/day for years five through
ten. The total estimated cost for the
proposed facilities is $23,549,557.
Any questions regarding the
application are to be directed to Skip
George, Manager of Regulatory, Kinder
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46617
Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission
LLC, P.O. Box 281304, Lakewood,
Colorado 80228–8304, phone (303) 914–
4969.
Any person wishing to obtain legal
status by becoming a party to the
proceedings for this project should, on
or before the below listed comment
date, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with
the requirements of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR
385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A
person obtaining party status will be
placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and
will receive copies of all documents
filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 14 copies
of filings made with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
Motions to intervene, protests and
comments may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper, see, 18
CFR 385.2001 (a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s web
site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. The
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
Comment Date: September 4, 2007.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–16390 Filed 8–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL07–82–000]
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation,
Arizona Public Service Company,
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation,
APS Energy Services Company, Inc;
Notice of Institution of Proceeding and
Refund Effective Date
August 14, 2007.
On August 13, 2007, the Commission
issued an order that instituted a
proceeding in the above-referenced
docket, pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA) 16 U.S.C.
824e, to determine whether Pinnacle
West Capital Corporation’s, Arizona
Public Service Company’s, Pinnacle
West Energy Corporation’s and APS
Energy Services Company, Inc.’s
(collectively, Pinnacle) market-based
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46615-46617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16386]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[IC07-80-001, FERC Form 80]
Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed
Collection; Comment Request; Extension
August 14, 2007.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) has submitted the information
collection described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and reinstatement of this information collection
requirement. Any interested person may file comments directly with OMB
and should address a copy of those comments to the Commission as
explained below. The Commission received comments from two commenters
in response to an earlier Federal Register notice of April 16, 2007 (72
FR 18967-68) and has responded to those comments in the justification
that it is submitting to OMB. Copies of this submission were also sent
to the commenters.
DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due by September
21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
Comments to OMB should be filed electronically, c/o oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov and include the OMB Control No. as a point of
reference. The Desk Officer may be reached by telephone at 202-395-
7345. A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Office of the Executive Director, ED-34,
Attention: Michael Miller, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Comments may be filed either in paper format or electronically. Those
persons filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For
paper filings an original and 14 copies of such comments should be
submitted to the Secretary of the Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 and should
refer to Docket No. IC07-80-001.
Documents filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format. To
file the document, access the Commission's Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov and click on ``Make an E-Filing,'' and then follow the
instructions for each screen. First time users will have to establish a
user name and password. The Commission will send an automatic
acknowledgement to the sender's e-mail address upon receipt of
comments. User assistance for electronic filings is available at 202-
502-8258 or by e-mail to efiling@ferc.gov. Comments should not be
submitted to this e-mail address.
All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the
Internet through FERC's homepage using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in
[[Page 46616]]
the docket number field to access the document. For user assistance,
contact FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at (866) 208-3676 or
for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at (202) 502-8415, by fax at (202) 273-0873, and by e-mail at
michael.miller@ferc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description
The information collection submitted for OMB review contains the
following:
1. Collection of Information: FERC Form 80 ``Licensed Hydropower
Development Recreation Report''.
2. Sponsor: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
3. Control No. 1902-0106.
The Commission is now requesting that OMB approve and reinstate the
information collection for an additional three years.
The FERC Form 80 has been revised to facilitate greater ease to
respondents in providing the information. As initially proposed, FERC
Form 80 was updated to eliminate data concerning the nearest city and
population, since FERC staff can access the information from other
sources. Second, FERC staff has clarified the definitions so
respondents have a better understanding of the information to be
provided. Third, resource data has been updated to include FERC
approved recreational sites. Fourth, a new field has been added so that
respondents can identify the method used for collecting the data.
In response to the 60-Day Notice of April 16, 2007, commenters
proposed additional changes to the FERC Form 80. Specifically,
commenters requested the following changes to the collection:
(a) To exclude recreational facilities that are not owned by the
licensee even if they are within the project boundary;
(b) To change the report cycle from every six years to seven to 12
years;
(c) To add a trail count as a means to gauge recreation facility
occupancy;
(d) To add attendance records as a means to estimate use and
facility occupancy;
(e) To clarify in the instructions the types of recreation visits
to include both public and private facilities;
(f) To clarify wildlife and hunting areas so that it's clear
whether acres or areas are to be reported;
(g) To define the terms ``commercial'' and ``private'' use
facilities;
(h) To report picnic sites and commercial boat mooring areas as two
separate recreational resources; and
(i) To eliminate recreational resources that occurs infrequently,
such as golf courses and playground facilities.
Additionally, commentors have questioned the need for the following
data elements in the information collection:
(a) Whether FERC approved facilities should include third party
resources within the project boundary that must be approved under the
standard land use article;
(b) Whether total miles/acres of recreation areas are necessary;
(c) Whether informal/dispersed camp sites should be included; and
(d) Whether organizational camping areas within the project
boundary should be included.
Both commentors questioned the Commission's estimate of 3 hours to
complete the information collection.
Commission Proposal
The Commission proposes to adopt the following recommendations: A
trail count as a means to gauge recreation facility occupancy and the
addition of attendance records as a means to estimate use and facility
occupancy.
With regard to the other recommendations, the Commission will not
adopt them for the following reasons:
(a) The exclusion of recreational facilities that are not owned by
the licensee even though they may be within the project boundary.
The goal of the Commission's policy on recreation is to develop the
project area in a comprehensive manner. Therefore the data collection
is designed to include information on all recreational facilities
located within the project boundary, including those provided by other
federal, state, and local agencies. Title 18 CFR Part 2.7 encourages
licensees to cooperate with other entities to provide recreation
opportunities. This cooperation and comprehensive approach to providing
recreational access at licensed projects not only provides a better
recreation experience, but also addresses impacts to environmental
resources in the area by not overlapping an area. The proposed revision
to the Form 80 includes a column that identifies which facilities are
parts of an approved recreation plan for the project as opposed to
those controlled by another entity.
(b) Change the reporting cycle from every six years to seven to
twelve years. The FERC Form 80s are collected every 6 years to ensure
that recreation facilities are meeting the needs of the public. The
Form 80's are used on a regular basis as a tool to evaluate recreation
at the projects and the Commission believes 6 years is an appropriate
period of time to monitor use.
(c) To clarify in the instructions the types of recreation visits
to include both public and private facilities.
The recreation visits should include all recreation days at
projects at approved facilities, facilities provided by other entities,
and general access areas. It does not include visits to private or
residential docks or to facilities outside the project boundary.
(d) To clarify wildlife and hunting areas so that it's clear
whether acres or areas are to be reported.
These are areas within the FERC project boundary that can be used
for wildlife viewing and hunting.
(e) To define the terms ``commercial'' and ``private'' use
facilities. The Commission does not distinguish between private and
commercial recreation facilities.
(f) To report picnic sites and commercial boat mooring areas as two
separate recreational resources.
We do not believe these types of resources need to be reported
separately. If necessary during a project specific review, we will
request these types of details from the licensee.
(g) To eliminate recreational resources that occurs infrequently,
such as golf courses and playground facilities.
We have eliminated or combined some facilities over previous Form
80s. We believe the facilities currently reported on the Form 80 are
representative of all recreational opportunities currently available at
hydropower projects. For example, golf courses are an important
recreational feature at projects throughout the southeast.
In response to commenters' concerns of whether the following
information was necessary on the FERC Form 80, we provide the
following:
(a) Whether FERC approved facilities should include third party
resources within the project boundary that must be approved under the
standard land use article.
FERC Approved Resources means those facilities that are required in
an approved recreation plan or subsequent amendments or those
identified in an Exhibit E filed with the license and approved. It does
not include facilities approved as non-project uses of project lands
and water.
(b) Whether total miles/acres of recreation areas are necessary.
We use total miles/acres to determine the need for additional
facilities.
(c) Whether informal/dispersed camp sites should be included.
[[Page 46617]]
Informal/dispersed camping can be included in access areas.
(d) Whether organizational camping areas within the project
boundary should be included.
All recreation areas should be reported, not just public
recreation.
(e) Underestimation of the reporting burden. Both commenters
believe the Commission has underestimated the amount of time it takes
to complete the Form 80 (3 hours).
The Commission's estimate of the time to complete the Form 80s is
an average of its licensees ranging from large complicated projects
with extensive recreation to smaller less developed projects. In an
effort to minimize the burden to licensees, we have eliminated some
data fields where the information may be readily available from other
sources. Data collection can take place in conjunction with other
required monitoring or with other activities at the project such as
water quality or dissolved oxygen sampling or general maintenance of
the facilities.
4. Necessity of the Collection of Information: Submission of the
information is necessary for the Commission to carry out its
responsibilities in implementing the statutory provisions of the
sections 4(a), 10(a), 301(a), 304 and 309 of the Federal Power Act
(FPA). The authority for the Commission to collect this information
comes from Section 10(a) of the FPA which requires the Commission to be
responsible for ensuring those hydro projects subjects to its
jurisdiction are consistent with the comprehensive development of the
nation's waterway for recreation and other beneficial public uses.
In the interest of fulfilling these objectives, the Commission
expects licensees subject to its jurisdiction, to recognize the
resources that are affected by their activities and to play a role in
protecting such resources. The information filed with the Commission is
mandatory.
5. Respondent Description: The respondent universe currently
comprises 400 entities (on average) subject to the Commission's
jurisdiction.
6. Estimated Burden: 1,200 total hours, 400 respondents (average),
1 response per respondent, and 3 hours per response (rounded off and
average time).
7. Estimated Cost Burden to respondents: 1,200 hours/2080 hours per
years x $122,137 per year = $70,464. The cost per respondent is equal
to $176 (rounded off).
Statutory Authority: Statutory provisions of sections 4(a),
10(a), 301(a), 304 and 309 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 797,
803, 825c and 825h.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-16386 Filed 8-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P