Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 46183-46185 [E7-16199]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
or other information described in this
title.
(b) Agencies are responsible for
correcting errors in data provided to
OPM under § 850.301.
§ 850.303
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
Return of personal documents.
An individual who submits personal
documents to OPM in support of a claim
for retirement or insurance benefits may
have such documents returned to the
individual if he or she requests the
return of the documents when
submitting the documents. If OPM
receives a request for return of such
documents at a later time, OPM may
provide the individual with a copy of
the document that is derived from
electronic records.
Subpart D—Submission of Law
Enforcement, Firefighter, and Nuclear
Materials Courier Retirement Coverage
Notices
§ 850.401 Electronic notice of coverage
determination.
(a) An agency or other entity that
submits electronic employee records
directly or through a shared service
center to the electronic retirement and
insurance processing system must
electronically submit the notice of law
enforcement officer, firefighter, or
nuclear materials retirement coverage
required by § 831.811(a), 831.911(a),
842.808(a), or 842.910(a) of this title
through EHRI to the electronic
retirement and insurance processing
system.
(b) The electronic notice required by
paragraph (a) must include the position
description number of the position for
which law enforcement officer,
firefighter, or nuclear materials courier
retirement coverage has been approved.
(c) An agency or other entity
submitting an electronic notice required
by paragraph (a) must electronically
submit the coverage determination and
background file required to be
maintained by § 831.811(b), 831.911(b),
842.808(b), or 842.910(b) to the
electronic retirement and insurance
processing system for each position
included in the notice.
[FR Doc. E7–16256 Filed 8–16–07; 8:45 am]
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Aug 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the
2007–08 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.0101 to $0.0122 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board locally administers
the marketing order which regulates the
handling of walnuts grown in
California. Assessments upon walnut
handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The marketing year begins
August 1 and ends July 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the docket number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Shereen.Marino@usda.gov, or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 984, both as amended (7
CFR part 984), regulating the handling
of walnuts grown in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California walnut handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable
walnuts beginning on August 1, 2007,
and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Board for the 2007–08 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.0101 to $0.0122
per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts.
The California walnut marketing
order provides authority for the Board,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0089;
FV07–984–1 PR]
Sfmt 4702
46183
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
46184
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
administer the program. The members
of the Board are producers and handlers
of California walnuts. They are familiar
with the Board’s needs and the costs for
goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed at a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2006–07 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Board recommended, and
USDA approved, an assessment rate of
$0.0101 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts that would continue
in effect from year to year unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Board or
other information available to USDA.
The Board met on May 31, 2007, and
unanimously recommended 2007–08
expenditures of $3,777,120 and an
assessment rate of $0.0122 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $3,222,860.
The assessment rate of $0.0122 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts is $0.0021 per pound higher
than the rate currently in effect. The
increased assessment rate is necessary
to cover increased expenses including
increased salaries, operating expenses
and research for the 2007–08 marketing
year. The higher assessment rate should
generate sufficient income to cover
anticipated 2007–08 expenses.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2006–07 and 2007–08
marketing years:
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Budget expense
categories
Administrative
Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits ..................
Travel/Board Expenses ...........
Office Costs/Annual Audit ......
Program Expenses Including Research
Controlled
Purchases .....
Crop Acreage
Survey ...........
Crop Estimate ...
Production Research ...........
Domestic Market
Development
Reserve for
Contingency ..
VerDate Aug<31>2005
2006–07
$415,000
75,000
142,500
5,000
....................
100,000
725,000
1,750,000
10,360
15:36 Aug 16, 2007
2007–08
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of California walnuts
certified as merchantable. Merchantable
shipments for the year are estimated at
309,600,000 kernelweight pounds
which should provide $3,777,120 in
assessment income and allow the Board
to cover its expenses. Unexpended
funds may be used temporarily to defray
expenses of the subsequent marketing
year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5
months after the end of the year,
according to § 984.69.
The estimate for merchantable
shipments is based on historical data,
which is the prior year’s production of
344,000 tons (inshell). Pursuant to
§ 984.51(b) of the order, this figure was
converted to a merchantable
kernelweight basis using a factor of .45
(344,000 tons × 2,000 pounds/ton × .45).
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Board or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Board would continue to meet prior to
or during each marketing year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Board meetings are
available from the Board or USDA.
Board meetings are open to the public
and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA
would evaluate Board recommendations
and other available information to
determine whether modification of the
assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking would be undertaken as
necessary. The Board’s 2007–08 budget
and those for subsequent fiscal periods
would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
$438,600
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
139,500 Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
5,000 flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
85,000 regulatory actions to the scale of
100,000 business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
730,000 or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
2,002,000 Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
191,020
through group action of essentially
86,000
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 53 handlers
of California walnuts subject to
regulation under the marketing order
and approximately 4,800 growers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those whose annual receipts
are less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000.
Current industry information shows
that 18 of the 53 handlers (34 percent)
shipped over $6,500,000 of
merchantable walnuts and could be
considered large handlers by the SBA.
Thirty-five of the 53 walnut handlers
(66 percent) shipped under $6,500,000
of merchantable walnuts and could be
considered small handlers.
The number of large walnut growers
(annual walnut revenue greater than
$750,000) can be estimated as follows.
According to the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS), the two-year
average yield per acre for 2005 and 2006
is approximately 1.63 tons. A grower
with 290 acres with an average yield of
1.63 tons per acre would produce
approximately 473 tons. The season
average of grower prices for 2005 and
2006 (published by NASS) is $1,585 per
ton. At that average price, the 473 tons
produced on 290 acres would yield
approximately $750,000 in annual
revenue. The 2002 Agricultural Census
indicated two percent of walnut farms
were between 250 and 500 acres in size.
The 290 acres would produce, on
average, about $750,000 in annual
revenue from walnuts and is near the
lower end of the 250 to 500 acreage
range category of the 2002 census. Thus,
it can be concluded that the number of
large walnut farms in 2006 is likely to
be around two percent. Based on the
foregoing, it can be concluded that the
majority of California walnut handlers
and producers may be classified as
small entities.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Board and collected from handlers for
the 2007–08 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0101 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts to $0.0122
per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board unanimously
recommended 2007–08 expenditures of
$3,777,120 and an assessment rate of
$0.0122 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The proposed
assessment rate of $0.0122 is $0.0021
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The quantity of assessable walnuts for
the 2007–08 marketing year is estimated
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
these inshell prices per pound by the
0.45 conversion factor (inshell to
kernelweight) established in the order
yields a 2007–08 price range estimate of
$1.74 and $1.78 per kernelweight pound
of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower
revenue represented by the assessment
rate, the assessment rate of $0.0122 (per
kernelweight pound) is divided into the
low and high estimates of the price
Budget expense
range. The estimated assessment
2006–07
2007–08
categories
revenue for the 2007–08 marketing year
as a percentage of total grower revenue
Administrative
would likely range between 0.701 and
Staff/Field Sal0.685 percent.
aries & BeneThis action would increase the
fits ..................
$415,000
$438,600
Travel/Board Exassessment obligation imposed on
penses ...........
75,000
86,000 handlers. While assessments impose
Office Costs/Ansome additional costs on handlers, the
nual Audit ......
142,500
139,500 costs are minimal and uniform on all
Program Exhandlers. Some of the additional costs
penses Includmay be passed on to producers.
ing Research
However, these costs would be offset by
Controlled
Purchases .....
5,000
5,000 the benefits derived by the operation of
the marketing order. In addition, the
Crop Acreage
Survey ........... ....................
85,000 Board’s meeting was widely publicized
Crop Estimate ...
100,000
100,000 throughout the California walnut
Production Reindustry and all interested persons were
search ...........
725,000
730,000 invited to attend the meeting and
Domestic Market
participate in Board deliberations on all
Development
1,750,000
2,002,000
issues. Like all Board meetings, the May
Reserve for
Contingency ..
10,360
191,020 31, 2007, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
The Board reviewed and unanimously were able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
recommended 2007–08 expenditures of
submit comments on this proposed rule,
$3,777,120. Prior to arriving at this
budget, the Board considered alternative including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
expenditure levels, but ultimately
small businesses.
decided that the recommended levels
This proposed rule would impose no
were reasonable to properly administer
additional reporting or recordkeeping
the order. The assessment rate
recommended by the Board was derived requirements on either small or large
California walnut handlers. As with all
by dividing anticipated expenses by
Federal marketing order programs,
expected shipments of California
reports and forms are periodically
walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
estimated at 309,600,000 kernelweight
industry and public sector agencies.
pounds which should provide
AMS is committed to complying with
$3,777,120 in assessment income and
the E-Government Act, to promote the
allow the Board to cover its expenses.
use of Internet and other information
Unexpended funds may be used
technologies to provide increased
temporarily to defray expenses of the
subsequent marketing year, but must be opportunities for citizen access to
Government information and services,
made available to the handlers from
and for other purposes.
whom collected within 5 months after
USDA has not identified any relevant
the end of the year, according to
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
§ 984.69.
According to NASS, the season
conflict with this rule.
average grower prices for years 2005 and
A small business guide on complying
2006 were $1,570 and $1,600 per ton
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
respectively. These prices provide a
marketing agreements and orders may
reasonable price range within which the be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
2007–08 season average price is likely to fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
fall. Dividing these average grower
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
prices by 2,000 pounds per ton provides Guerber at the previously mentioned
an inshell price per pound range of
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
between $0.785 and $0.80. Dividing
CONTACT section.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
at 344,000 tons. Thus, the $0.0122 rate
should provide $3,777,120 in
assessment income and be adequate to
meet this year’s expenses. The increased
assessment rate is primarily due to
increased budget expenditures.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2006–07 and 2007–08
fiscal years:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Aug 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46185
A 15-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2007–08 marketing year will begin on
August 1, 2007, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for
each year apply to all assessable
walnuts handled during the year; (2) the
Board needs to have sufficient funds to
pay its expenses which are incurred on
a continuous basis and; (3) handlers are
aware of this action which was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a public meeting and is similar
to other assessment rate actions issued
in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 984.347
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2007, an
assessment rate of $0.0122 per
kernelweight pound is established for
California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: August 13, 2007.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–16199 Filed 8–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Guam 07–005]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Tinian, Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change a permanent security zone in
waters adjacent to the island of Tinian,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI). Review of this
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 159 (Friday, August 17, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46183-46185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16199]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0089; FV07-984-1 PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for
the Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the 2007-08 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.0101 to $0.0122 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The Board locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California.
Assessments upon walnut handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The marketing year
begins August 1 and ends July 31. The assessment rate would remain in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-
5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail: Shereen.Marino@usda.gov, or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 984, both as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
walnut handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all
assessable walnuts beginning on August 1, 2007, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State
or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Board for the 2007-08 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0101 to
$0.0122 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts.
The California walnut marketing order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to
[[Page 46184]]
administer the program. The members of the Board are producers and
handlers of California walnuts. They are familiar with the Board's
needs and the costs for goods and services in their local area and are
thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed at a public
meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2006-07 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.0101 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on May 31, 2007, and unanimously recommended 2007-08
expenditures of $3,777,120 and an assessment rate of $0.0122 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. In comparison, last year's
budgeted expenditures were $3,222,860. The assessment rate of $0.0122
per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts is $0.0021 per pound
higher than the rate currently in effect. The increased assessment rate
is necessary to cover increased expenses including increased salaries,
operating expenses and research for the 2007-08 marketing year. The
higher assessment rate should generate sufficient income to cover
anticipated 2007-08 expenses.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 marketing years:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2006-07 2007-08
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits $415,000 $438,600
Travel/Board Expenses......................... 75,000 86,000
Office Costs/Annual Audit..................... 142,500 139,500
Program Expenses Including Research Controlled 5,000 5,000
Purchases....................................
Crop Acreage Survey........................... ........... 85,000
Crop Estimate................................. 100,000 100,000
Production Research........................... 725,000 730,000
Domestic Market Development................... 1,750,000 2,002,000
Reserve for Contingency....................... 10,360 191,020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable. Merchantable shipments for the year
are estimated at 309,600,000 kernelweight pounds which should provide
$3,777,120 in assessment income and allow the Board to cover its
expenses. Unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray expenses
of the subsequent marketing year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5 months after the end of the year,
according to Sec. 984.69.
The estimate for merchantable shipments is based on historical
data, which is the prior year's production of 344,000 tons (inshell).
Pursuant to Sec. 984.51(b) of the order, this figure was converted to
a merchantable kernelweight basis using a factor of .45 (344,000 tons x
2,000 pounds/ton x .45).
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Board or other available information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Board would continue to meet prior to or during each
marketing year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Board meetings are available from the Board or USDA. Board
meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Board
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Board's 2007-08 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 53 handlers of California walnuts subject
to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 4,800 growers
in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $6,500,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000.
Current industry information shows that 18 of the 53 handlers (34
percent) shipped over $6,500,000 of merchantable walnuts and could be
considered large handlers by the SBA. Thirty-five of the 53 walnut
handlers (66 percent) shipped under $6,500,000 of merchantable walnuts
and could be considered small handlers.
The number of large walnut growers (annual walnut revenue greater
than $750,000) can be estimated as follows. According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the two-year average yield per
acre for 2005 and 2006 is approximately 1.63 tons. A grower with 290
acres with an average yield of 1.63 tons per acre would produce
approximately 473 tons. The season average of grower prices for 2005
and 2006 (published by NASS) is $1,585 per ton. At that average price,
the 473 tons produced on 290 acres would yield approximately $750,000
in annual revenue. The 2002 Agricultural Census indicated two percent
of walnut farms were between 250 and 500 acres in size. The 290 acres
would produce, on average, about $750,000 in annual revenue from
walnuts and is near the lower end of the 250 to 500 acreage range
category of the 2002 census. Thus, it can be concluded that the number
of large walnut farms in 2006 is likely to be around two percent. Based
on the foregoing, it can be concluded that the majority of California
walnut handlers and producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Board and collected from handlers for the 2007-08 and subsequent
marketing years from $0.0101 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts to $0.0122 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. The
Board unanimously recommended 2007-08 expenditures of $3,777,120 and an
assessment rate of $0.0122 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The proposed assessment rate of $0.0122 is $0.0021 higher than
the rate currently in effect. The quantity of assessable walnuts for
the 2007-08 marketing year is estimated
[[Page 46185]]
at 344,000 tons. Thus, the $0.0122 rate should provide $3,777,120 in
assessment income and be adequate to meet this year's expenses. The
increased assessment rate is primarily due to increased budget
expenditures.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 fiscal years:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2006-07 2007-08
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits $415,000 $438,600
Travel/Board Expenses......................... 75,000 86,000
Office Costs/Annual Audit..................... 142,500 139,500
Program Expenses Including Research Controlled 5,000 5,000
Purchases....................................
Crop Acreage Survey........................... ........... 85,000
Crop Estimate................................. 100,000 100,000
Production Research........................... 725,000 730,000
Domestic Market Development................... 1,750,000 2,002,000
Reserve for Contingency....................... 10,360 191,020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board reviewed and unanimously recommended 2007-08 expenditures
of $3,777,120. Prior to arriving at this budget, the Board considered
alternative expenditure levels, but ultimately decided that the
recommended levels were reasonable to properly administer the order.
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected shipments of California walnuts
certified as merchantable. Merchantable shipments for the year are
estimated at 309,600,000 kernelweight pounds which should provide
$3,777,120 in assessment income and allow the Board to cover its
expenses. Unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray expenses
of the subsequent marketing year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5 months after the end of the year,
according to Sec. 984.69.
According to NASS, the season average grower prices for years 2005
and 2006 were $1,570 and $1,600 per ton respectively. These prices
provide a reasonable price range within which the 2007-08 season
average price is likely to fall. Dividing these average grower prices
by 2,000 pounds per ton provides an inshell price per pound range of
between $0.785 and $0.80. Dividing these inshell prices per pound by
the 0.45 conversion factor (inshell to kernelweight) established in the
order yields a 2007-08 price range estimate of $1.74 and $1.78 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower revenue represented by the
assessment rate, the assessment rate of $0.0122 (per kernelweight
pound) is divided into the low and high estimates of the price range.
The estimated assessment revenue for the 2007-08 marketing year as a
percentage of total grower revenue would likely range between 0.701 and
0.685 percent.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the Board's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California walnut industry and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Board
deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the May 31, 2007,
meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons
are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the
regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California walnut
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is deemed appropriate
because: (1) The 2007-08 marketing year will begin on August 1, 2007,
and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each
year apply to all assessable walnuts handled during the year; (2) the
Board needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are
incurred on a continuous basis and; (3) handlers are aware of this
action which was unanimously recommended by the Board at a public
meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past
years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 984.347 Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2007, an assessment rate of $0.0122 per
kernelweight pound is established for California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: August 13, 2007.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-16199 Filed 8-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P