Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes, 45963-45965 [E7-16116]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Replacing both intercostal tee clips on
the left and right sides with new tee clips in
accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006, terminates the repetitive
inspections required by this AD.
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by October 1, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757–
200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0093,
dated November 8, 2006.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracked
intercostal tee clips at the number 3 and
number 4 doorstops of the passenger door
cutouts. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking of the tee clips, which could
result in additional stress on the adjacent tee
clips, surrounding intercostals, edge frame,
door structure and doorstops. This additional
stress could cause further cracking or
breaking of the tee clips, which could result
in failure of the door to seal and consequent
rapid decompression of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Repetitive Inspections/Investigative and
Corrective Actions
(f) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total
flight cycles or within 3,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
is later: Do the applicable inspection
specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD by doing all the actions including all
applicable related investigative (additional
detailed inspections if necessary) and
corrective actions; except as provided by
paragraph (g) of this AD; in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006. All related investigative
and corrective actions must be done before
further flight.
(1) Do a detailed inspection for cracks of
the intercostal tee clips and attachment
fasteners at the number 3 and number 4
doorstops of the passenger door cutouts.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles until
accomplishment of the terminating action
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) Do a detailed inspection with a
borescope for cracks of the intercostal tee
clips. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles
until accomplishment of the terminating
action specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(g) If any cracked structure is found during
any inspection required by this AD, and the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006, specify to contact Boeing
for appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair any cracked structure using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Aug 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(3) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–16103 Filed 8–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
45963
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found the development of
cracks in the forward fuselage right hand
(RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical
length, reducing the aircraft structural
integrity, with possible rapid decompression
of the aircraft.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 17,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2125;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28987; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–127–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–135ER,
–135KE, –135KL, and –135LR
Airplanes and Model EMB–145,
–145ER, –145MR, –145LR, –145XR,
–145MP, and –145EP Airplanes
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
45964
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–28987; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–127–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
ADDRESSES
Discussion
ˆ
The Agencia Nacional de Aviacao
¸˜
Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation
authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2007–05–01R1,
effective July 4, 2007 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
It has been found the development of
cracks in the forward fuselage right hand
(RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical
length, reducing the aircraft structural
integrity, with possible rapid decompression
of the aircraft.
The corrective action includes rework
of the aircraft structure on the forward
fuselage LH (left-hand) and RH sides.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Relevant Service Information
EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletin
145–53–0067, Revision 01, dated
February 27, 2007. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Aug 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 624 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 60 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $1,210 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these costs. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$3,750,240, or $6,010 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE
AERONAUTICA S.A. (EMBRAER):
Docket No. FAA–2007–28987;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–127–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
September 17, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model
EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, and –135LR
airplanes; and Model EMB–145, –145ER,
–145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and
–145EP airplanes; certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
It has been found the development of
cracks in the forward fuselage right hand
(RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
45965
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical
length, reducing the aircraft structural
integrity, with possible rapid decompression
of the aircraft.
The corrective action includes rework of
the aircraft structure on the forward fuselage
LH (left-hand) and RH sides.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Prior to the accumulation of 22,000 total
flight cycles, or within 6 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever is later,
unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Add two reinforcements to the forward
fuselage skin on the LH and RH sides
between frames 9 to 10 and 10 to 11, and
stringers 12 to 15. Install supports to the
reinforcements and stringers as well as new
fasteners to the reinforcements and supports,
and reroute the electrical wiring on the
affected area. Do all actions in accordance
with EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145–53–
0067, Revision 01, dated February 27, 2007.
(2) Accomplishing the detailed instructions
and procedures described in the EMBRAER
Service Bulletin 145–53–0051, dated July 15,
2004; or EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145–53–
0051, Revision 01, dated February 7, 2006; is
considered acceptable for compliance with
the actions specified in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directive 2007–05–01R1, effective July 4,
2007, and the service bulletins listed in Table
1 of this AD, for related information.
TABLE 1.—SERVICE BULLETINS
EMBRAER Service Bulletin
Revision level
145–53–0051 ...................................................................................................................................
145–53–0051 ...................................................................................................................................
145–53–0067 ...................................................................................................................................
Original ......................
01 ..............................
01 ..............................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30,
2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–16116 Filed 8–15–07; 8:45 am]
prevent failure of certain life-limited
parts, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by September
10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
for service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27715; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–140–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330 and A340 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier
NPRM for an airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all Airbus Model
A330–200, A330–300, A340–200, and
A340–300 series airplanes; and Model
A340–541 and A340–642 airplanes. The
original NPRM would have superseded
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Aug 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
an existing AD that currently requires
operators to revise the Airworthiness
Limitations section (ALS) of the
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA) to incorporate new
information. This information includes,
for all affected airplanes, decreased life
limit values for certain components; and
for Model A330–200 and –300 series
airplanes, new inspections, compliance
times, and new repetitive intervals to
detect fatigue cracking, accidental
damage, or corrosion in certain
structures. The original NPRM proposed
to revise the ALS, for all affected
airplanes, by adding new Airworthiness
Limitations Items (ALIs) to incorporate
service life limits for certain items and
inspections to detect fatigue cracking,
accidental damage or corrosion in
certain structures, in accordance with
the revised ALS of the ICA. The original
NPRM resulted from the issuance of
new and more restrictive service life
limits and structural inspections based
on fatigue testing and in-service
findings. This new action revises the
original NPRM by adding airplanes,
adding new requirements, and
including more restrictive compliance
thresholds and intervals. We are
proposing this supplemental NPRM to
detect and correct fatigue cracking,
accidental damage, or corrosion in
principal structural elements, and to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Date
July 15, 2004.
February 7, 2006.
February 27, 2007.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 158 (Thursday, August 16, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45963-45965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16116]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28987; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-127-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes and
Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found the development of cracks in the forward
fuselage right hand (RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical length, reducing the
aircraft structural integrity, with possible rapid decompression of
the aircraft.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 17,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
DOT Docket Web Site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the
[[Page 45964]]
ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-28987; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NM-127-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Aviacao Civil (ANAC), which is the
aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian Airworthiness
Directive 2007-05-01R1, effective July 4, 2007 (referred to after this
as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
It has been found the development of cracks in the forward
fuselage right hand (RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical length, reducing the
aircraft structural integrity, with possible rapid decompression of
the aircraft.
The corrective action includes rework of the aircraft structure on
the forward fuselage LH (left-hand) and RH sides. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletin 145-53-0067, Revision 01, dated
February 27, 2007. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 624 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 60 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,210 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $3,750,240, or $6,010 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE AERONAUTICA S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2007-28987; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-127-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by September 17, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -
135KL, and -135LR airplanes; and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -
145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP airplanes; certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
It has been found the development of cracks in the forward
fuselage right hand (RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
[[Page 45965]]
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical length, reducing the
aircraft structural integrity, with possible rapid decompression of
the aircraft.
The corrective action includes rework of the aircraft structure
on the forward fuselage LH (left-hand) and RH sides.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Prior to the accumulation of 22,000 total flight cycles, or
within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever is
later, unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Add two reinforcements to the forward fuselage skin on the
LH and RH sides between frames 9 to 10 and 10 to 11, and stringers
12 to 15. Install supports to the reinforcements and stringers as
well as new fasteners to the reinforcements and supports, and
reroute the electrical wiring on the affected area. Do all actions
in accordance with EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-53-0067, Revision
01, dated February 27, 2007.
(2) Accomplishing the detailed instructions and procedures
described in the EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-53-0051, dated July
15, 2004; or EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-53-0051, Revision 01,
dated February 7, 2006; is considered acceptable for compliance with
the actions specified in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2007-05-
01R1, effective July 4, 2007, and the service bulletins listed in
Table 1 of this AD, for related information.
Table 1.--Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMBRAER Service Bulletin Revision level Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
145-53-0051........................... Original........................... July 15, 2004.
145-53-0051........................... 01................................. February 7, 2006.
145-53-0067........................... 01................................. February 27, 2007.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-16116 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P