Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 Series Airplanes, 45961-45963 [E7-16103]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
a location where the requirements of this AD
can be accomplished.
Related Information
(j) European Aviation Safety Agency
airworthiness directives 2006–0147, 2006–
0148, 2006–0149, and 2006–0156, all dated
June 7, 2006, also address the subject of this
AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30,
2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–16124 Filed 8–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28990; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–033–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 757–200, –200CB, and –300
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 757–200, –200CB,
and –300 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for cracks of the intercostal
tee clips and attachment fasteners at the
number 3 and number 4 doorstops of
the passenger door cutouts, or repetitive
inspections for cracks of the intercostal
tee clips; and related investigative/
corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD also provides an optional
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. This proposed AD results
from reports of cracked intercostal tee
clips at the number 3 and number 4
doorstops of the passenger door cutouts.
We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracking of the tee clips, which
could result in additional stress on the
adjacent tee clips, surrounding
intercostals, edge frame, door structure
and doorstops. This additional stress
could cause further cracking or breaking
of the tee clips, which could result in
failure of the door to seal and
consequent rapid decompression of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 1, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:05 Aug 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Stremick, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 917–6450; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2007–28990; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–033–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45961
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the
DOT street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
the Docket Management System receives
them.
Discussion
We have received eight reports
indicating that cracked intercostal tee
clips were found at the number 3 and
number 4 doorstops of the passenger
door cutouts on certain Boeing Model
757–200, –200CB, and –300 series
airplanes. These cracks were found
during normal maintenance checks on
passenger doorway number 4, at the aft
edge frame of body station 1681.8 on the
left and right sides. On two airplanes,
cracks were found on the intercostal tee
clips at both the number 3 and number
4 doorstops. The cracks occurred in the
radius area of the tee clip, between the
horizontal and vertical flange. The
number of flight cycles for these
airplanes was between 22,700 and
25,000. The cracks in the tee clips are
attributed to a preload of the tee clip;
continued flight with cracks in the tee
clips can place additional stress on the
adjacent tee clips, surrounding
intercostals, edge frame, door structure
and doorstops. This additional stress, if
not corrected, could cause further
cracking or breaking of the tee clips,
which could result in failure of the door
to seal and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006. The service bulletin
describes procedures for repetitive
detailed inspections with a borescope
for cracks of the intercostal tee clips; or
repetitive detailed inspections for cracks
of the intercostal tee clips and
attachment fasteners at the number 3
and number 4 doorstops of the
passenger door cutouts after the galley/
lavatory has been removed; and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. The related investigative and
corrective actions include the following:
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
45962
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
• Condition 1: For airplanes on which
any tee clip for only door stop
intercostal number 3 is cracked or
broken; the procedures specify replacing
any cracked tee clip with a new tee clip
and contacting Boeing before further
flight. In addition, the procedures
describe inspections of the door stop
fittings on the forward side of body
station 1681.8 edge frame; the inner
chord, web, and outer chord; the
number 4 door structure including the
door stop fittings and stop beams above
and below the cracked tee clips; and the
number 4 aft door frame.
• Condition 2: For airplanes on which
any tee clip for only door stop
intercostal number 4 is cracked or
broken; the procedures specify replacing
any cracked tee clip with a new tee clip
and contacting Boeing before further
flight. In addition, the procedures
describe inspections of the tee clip and
intercostal for cracking at door stop
intercostal number 5; and from door
stop number 3 through number 5:
Inspecting the door stop fittings on the
forward side of the body station 1681.8
edge frame; the inner chord, web, and
outer chord; the number 4 door
structure including the door stop fittings
and stop beams above and below the
cracked tee clips; and the number 4 aft
door frame.
• Condition 3: For airplanes on which
both tee clips for only door stop
intercostal numbers 3 and 4 are cracked
or broken; the procedures specify
replacing the cracked tee clip with a
new tee clip and contacting Boeing
before further flight. In addition, the
procedures describe inspections of the
fasteners; the door stop fittings on the
forward side of the body station 1681.8
edge frame; the inner chord, web, and
outer chord; the number 4 door
structure including the door stop fittings
and stop beams above and below the
cracked tee clips; for airplanes with
greater than 28,000 flight cycles, the
fasteners and the fillet radius of the stop
fittings; and the number 4 aft door
frame.
If cracked or broken tee clips are
found during any inspection, the
procedures describe inspecting the tee
clip and intercostal for cracks of the
door stop intercostal number 2 and
doing inspections from door stop
numbers 2 through 5. The additional
inspections are for cracks of the door
stop fittings; the inner chord, web, and
outer chord; and the body station 1681.8
edge frame.
Replacing both tee clips on the left
and right sides with new tee clips
would eliminate the need for the
repetitive inspections. Accomplishing
the actions specified in the service
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Aug 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
information is intended to adequately
address the unsafe condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Difference Between the Proposed AD
and Service Information.’’
Difference Between the Proposed AD
and Service Information
The service bulletin specifies to
contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would
require repairing those conditions in
one of the following ways:
• Using a method that we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by an
Authorized Representative for the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization
Organization whom we have authorized
to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 912 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
324 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed detailed inspection, if
accomplished, would take about 2 work
hours per airplane, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the
inspections proposed by this AD is
$51,840, or $160 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
The proposed borescope inspection, if
accomplished, would take about 3 work
hours per airplane, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the
inspections proposed by this AD is
$77,760, or $240 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2007–28990;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–033–AD.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 158 / Thursday, August 16, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Replacing both intercostal tee clips on
the left and right sides with new tee clips in
accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006, terminates the repetitive
inspections required by this AD.
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by October 1, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757–
200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0093,
dated November 8, 2006.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracked
intercostal tee clips at the number 3 and
number 4 doorstops of the passenger door
cutouts. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking of the tee clips, which could
result in additional stress on the adjacent tee
clips, surrounding intercostals, edge frame,
door structure and doorstops. This additional
stress could cause further cracking or
breaking of the tee clips, which could result
in failure of the door to seal and consequent
rapid decompression of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Repetitive Inspections/Investigative and
Corrective Actions
(f) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total
flight cycles or within 3,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
is later: Do the applicable inspection
specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD by doing all the actions including all
applicable related investigative (additional
detailed inspections if necessary) and
corrective actions; except as provided by
paragraph (g) of this AD; in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006. All related investigative
and corrective actions must be done before
further flight.
(1) Do a detailed inspection for cracks of
the intercostal tee clips and attachment
fasteners at the number 3 and number 4
doorstops of the passenger door cutouts.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles until
accomplishment of the terminating action
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) Do a detailed inspection with a
borescope for cracks of the intercostal tee
clips. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles
until accomplishment of the terminating
action specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(g) If any cracked structure is found during
any inspection required by this AD, and the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006, specify to contact Boeing
for appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair any cracked structure using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Aug 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(3) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–16103 Filed 8–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
45963
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found the development of
cracks in the forward fuselage right hand
(RH) side skin during full-scale fatigue tests.
Those cracks may quickly reach their critical
length, reducing the aircraft structural
integrity, with possible rapid decompression
of the aircraft.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 17,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2125;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28987; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–127–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–135ER,
–135KE, –135KL, and –135LR
Airplanes and Model EMB–145,
–145ER, –145MR, –145LR, –145XR,
–145MP, and –145EP Airplanes
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 158 (Thursday, August 16, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45961-45963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16103]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28990; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-033-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes.
This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for cracks of the
intercostal tee clips and attachment fasteners at the number 3 and
number 4 doorstops of the passenger door cutouts, or repetitive
inspections for cracks of the intercostal tee clips; and related
investigative/ corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD also
provides an optional terminating action for the repetitive inspections.
This proposed AD results from reports of cracked intercostal tee clips
at the number 3 and number 4 doorstops of the passenger door cutouts.
We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the tee
clips, which could result in additional stress on the adjacent tee
clips, surrounding intercostals, edge frame, door structure and
doorstops. This additional stress could cause further cracking or
breaking of the tee clips, which could result in failure of the door to
seal and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Stremick, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6450; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2007-
28990; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-033-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received eight reports indicating that cracked intercostal
tee clips were found at the number 3 and number 4 doorstops of the
passenger door cutouts on certain Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -
300 series airplanes. These cracks were found during normal maintenance
checks on passenger doorway number 4, at the aft edge frame of body
station 1681.8 on the left and right sides. On two airplanes, cracks
were found on the intercostal tee clips at both the number 3 and number
4 doorstops. The cracks occurred in the radius area of the tee clip,
between the horizontal and vertical flange. The number of flight cycles
for these airplanes was between 22,700 and 25,000. The cracks in the
tee clips are attributed to a preload of the tee clip; continued flight
with cracks in the tee clips can place additional stress on the
adjacent tee clips, surrounding intercostals, edge frame, door
structure and doorstops. This additional stress, if not corrected,
could cause further cracking or breaking of the tee clips, which could
result in failure of the door to seal and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006. The service bulletin describes procedures for
repetitive detailed inspections with a borescope for cracks of the
intercostal tee clips; or repetitive detailed inspections for cracks of
the intercostal tee clips and attachment fasteners at the number 3 and
number 4 doorstops of the passenger door cutouts after the galley/
lavatory has been removed; and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. The related investigative and corrective actions
include the following:
[[Page 45962]]
Condition 1: For airplanes on which any tee clip for only
door stop intercostal number 3 is cracked or broken; the procedures
specify replacing any cracked tee clip with a new tee clip and
contacting Boeing before further flight. In addition, the procedures
describe inspections of the door stop fittings on the forward side of
body station 1681.8 edge frame; the inner chord, web, and outer chord;
the number 4 door structure including the door stop fittings and stop
beams above and below the cracked tee clips; and the number 4 aft door
frame.
Condition 2: For airplanes on which any tee clip for only
door stop intercostal number 4 is cracked or broken; the procedures
specify replacing any cracked tee clip with a new tee clip and
contacting Boeing before further flight. In addition, the procedures
describe inspections of the tee clip and intercostal for cracking at
door stop intercostal number 5; and from door stop number 3 through
number 5: Inspecting the door stop fittings on the forward side of the
body station 1681.8 edge frame; the inner chord, web, and outer chord;
the number 4 door structure including the door stop fittings and stop
beams above and below the cracked tee clips; and the number 4 aft door
frame.
Condition 3: For airplanes on which both tee clips for
only door stop intercostal numbers 3 and 4 are cracked or broken; the
procedures specify replacing the cracked tee clip with a new tee clip
and contacting Boeing before further flight. In addition, the
procedures describe inspections of the fasteners; the door stop
fittings on the forward side of the body station 1681.8 edge frame; the
inner chord, web, and outer chord; the number 4 door structure
including the door stop fittings and stop beams above and below the
cracked tee clips; for airplanes with greater than 28,000 flight
cycles, the fasteners and the fillet radius of the stop fittings; and
the number 4 aft door frame.
If cracked or broken tee clips are found during any inspection, the
procedures describe inspecting the tee clip and intercostal for cracks
of the door stop intercostal number 2 and doing inspections from door
stop numbers 2 through 5. The additional inspections are for cracks of
the door stop fittings; the inner chord, web, and outer chord; and the
body station 1681.8 edge frame.
Replacing both tee clips on the left and right sides with new tee
clips would eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Difference Between the Proposed AD and Service Information.''
Difference Between the Proposed AD and Service Information
The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
Using a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization whom we have authorized to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 912 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 324 airplanes of
U.S. registry.
The proposed detailed inspection, if accomplished, would take about
2 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the inspections
proposed by this AD is $51,840, or $160 per airplane, per inspection
cycle.
The proposed borescope inspection, if accomplished, would take
about 3 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the
inspections proposed by this AD is $77,760, or $240 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-28990; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
033-AD.
[[Page 45963]]
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October
1, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300
series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0093, dated November 8, 2006.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracked intercostal tee
clips at the number 3 and number 4 doorstops of the passenger door
cutouts. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of
the tee clips, which could result in additional stress on the
adjacent tee clips, surrounding intercostals, edge frame, door
structure and doorstops. This additional stress could cause further
cracking or breaking of the tee clips, which could result in failure
of the door to seal and consequent rapid decompression of the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections/Investigative and Corrective Actions
(f) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever is later: Do the applicable inspection specified in
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD by doing all the actions
including all applicable related investigative (additional detailed
inspections if necessary) and corrective actions; except as provided
by paragraph (g) of this AD; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0093, dated
November 8, 2006. All related investigative and corrective actions
must be done before further flight.
(1) Do a detailed inspection for cracks of the intercostal tee
clips and attachment fasteners at the number 3 and number 4
doorstops of the passenger door cutouts. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles until
accomplishment of the terminating action specified in paragraph (h)
of this AD.
(2) Do a detailed inspection with a borescope for cracks of the
intercostal tee clips. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles until accomplishment of the
terminating action specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(g) If any cracked structure is found during any inspection
required by this AD, and the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0093, dated November 8, 2006, specify
to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair any cracked structure using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Replacing both intercostal tee clips on the left and right
sides with new tee clips in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-
53A0093, dated November 8, 2006, terminates the repetitive
inspections required by this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
(3) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-16103 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P