Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year 2007 Funding Opportunity for Research on the Economic Impact of Cooperatives, 45726-45731 [E7-15959]
Download as PDF
45726
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / Notices
Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van
Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky
42211, 270–924–2002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Dated: July 20, 2007.
William P. Lisowsky,
Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.
[FR Doc. E7–15991 Filed 8–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business—Cooperative Service
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year
2007 Funding Opportunity for
Research on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Rural Business—Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial Notice of request for
proposals.
SUMMARY: Rural Business—Cooperative
Service programs are administered
through USDA Rural Development.
USDA Rural Development announces
the availability of approximately
$500,000 in competitive cooperative
agreement funds for fiscal year (FY)
2007 to conduct research on the
national economic impact of all types of
cooperatives. USDA Rural Development
hereby requests proposals from
institutions of higher education
interested in applying for a
competitively awarded cooperative
research agreement. This funding is a
follow on to funding awarded in FY
2006, the intent of which was to
encourage research on the critical issue
of the economic value of cooperatives.
Funding for FY 2007 is expected to
replicate and expand upon research
undertaken with FY 2006 funds.
DATES: Interested parties may submit
completed applications for the
cooperative agreement on paper or
electronically according to the following
deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and
mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no
later than September 7, 2007, to be
eligible for FY 2007 funding. Electronic
copies must be received by September 7,
2007, to be eligible for FY 2007 funding.
Late applications are not eligible for FY
2007 funding.
ADDRESSES: Applicants may obtain
application forms, guides, and materials
for the cooperative agreement at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm or by contacting USDA Rural
Development at (202) 690–0368, (TDD:
(800) 877–8339, Federal Information
Relay Service) and ask for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Aug 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
cooperative research agreement
application kit.
Submit completed paper applications
for a cooperative agreement to USDA
Rural Development’s Cooperative
Programs, Attn: Cooperative Research,
Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016–South,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3250. The
phone number that should be used for
FedEx packages is (202) 720–7558.
Submit electronic applications at
https://www.grants.gov, following the
instructions found on this Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit
the program Web site at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm, which contains application
guidance, including an Application
Guide and application forms. Or you
may contact USDA Rural Development
at (202) 690–0368 (TDD: (800) 877–8339
Federal Information Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq., OMB must
approve all ‘‘collections of information’’
by USDA Rural Development. The Act
defines ‘‘collection of information’’ as a
requirement for ‘‘answers to * * *
identical reporting or recordkeeping
requirements imposed on ten or more
persons * * *.’’ (44 U.S.C. 3502(3)(A))
Because the RFP will receive less than
10 respondents, the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply.
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural Business—
Cooperative Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Research
on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives.
Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 10.778
Dates: You may submit completed
applications for the cooperative
agreement on paper or electronically
according to the following deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and
mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no
later than September 7, 2007, to be
eligible for FY 2007 funding. Late
applications are not eligible for FY 2007
funding.
Electronic copies must be received by
September 7, 2007, to be eligible for FY
2007 funding. Late applications are not
eligible for FY 2007 funding.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13): There is no public
reporting burden associated with this
notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Funding Opportunity Description
This solicitation is issued pursuant to
the Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5)
directing funds ‘‘for a cooperative
research agreement with a qualified
academic institution to conduct
research on the national economic
impact of all types of cooperatives.’’ The
Secretary of Agriculture has delegated
the program’s administration to USDA
Rural Development.
The primary objective of this
cooperative research agreement program
is to facilitate university research on the
national economic impact of
cooperatives. The research program will
need to develop a web-based
methodology to enable cooperatives to
enter financial and other impact data on
a periodic basis; apply the methodology
to collect data updates estimates of
economic impact of cooperatives;
analyze the impact of cooperatives on
local wealth creation and retention, and
analyze the total returns to investment
in cooperatives.
The cooperative agreement proposal
must address how the following
deliverables will be provided:
1. An analysis of how and the extent
to which cooperatives facilitate the
creation and retention of wealth within
the local communities they serve. The
analysis should include the
identification of cooperative models and
practices that could enhance
cooperative contribution to local wealth
creation. An estimate of cooperative
wealth creation should be made for the
U.S. and for each of the following four
categories or classes of cooperatives:
i. Commercial sales or marketing—
includes farm supply and marketing,
grocery and consumer goods, businessto-business, the emerging ethanol and
biofuels related industry, and
manufacturing.
ii. Social and public services—
includes housing, health care, day care/
elder care, transportation, and
educational services.
iii. Financial services—includes
credit unions, banks, and mutual
insurance.
iv. Utilities—includes electric,
telephone, water, waste, and other
regulated utilities.
2. An analysis of the total returns to
investment in cooperatives, including
returns to the cooperative businesses at
the enterprise level as well as the
impact of cooperative returns and
services to the cooperatives’ members at
their enterprise levels. Total returns to
investment should be analyzed using
the same classification scheme as
described in Deliverable #1 above.
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / Notices
3. The development of web-based
systems for the collection and assembly
of basic impact data on a periodic basis.
These systems should facilitate the
direct entry of financial and economic
impact data by individual cooperatives.
This methodology will need to account
for cooperative organizational
complexity, such as a single
organization’s several local, regional,
and national locations, as well as sector
differences.
4. The application of the web-based
systems, coupled with other available
data, to provide an update of data on the
economic impact of cooperatives
estimated under the FY 2006 funding.
This update should cover the calendar
year two years after the year for which
estimates were made under the FY 2006
research. As final output of the FY 2006
research will likely not be available
before January 2009, USDA Rural
Development will arrange for the
winner of this competition to obtain
updates and preliminary data from the
University of Wisconsin, the FY 2006
award recipient, as progress is being
made on the FY 2006 research. Data
items to be collected/measured must
include:
• Number and headquarters location
of cooperatives,
• Volume measures appropriate for
each sector (revenues, dollar value, and
other appropriate size indicators),
• Number of persons impacted by the
cooperative (members, patrons, or
investors), and;
• Number of full-time equivalent jobs
and other economic impact variables.
• North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code (if
multiple apply, use code that
corresponds to highest revenue).
Sectors for which summary data
should be prepared include:
• Housing,
• Health Care,
• Daycare/Elder Care,
• Financial Services,
• Grocery/Consumer Retail,
• Business-to-Business (Wholesaling,
Manufacturing),
• Agricultural Marketing (Including
Organic and Conventional),
• Agricultural Supplies and Services,
• Public Services (Including
Transportation and Education),
• Renewable Energy, and
• Utilities.
5. The population of a database for
individual cooperative and summary
data collected. The database is to be
delivered to USDA Rural Development.
USDA Rural Development will work
with the grantee to integrate data from
this deliverable into existing database
applications.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Aug 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
6. The performance of subcontracting
services, oversight, and financial
controls for the overall project.
7. The submission of quarterly
progress reports and quarterly financial
reports to USDA Rural Development;
and
8. The preparation and submission of
publishable quality written reports for
Deliverables 1, 2 and 4 to USDA Rural
Development.
USDA Rural Development will
competitively award one cooperative
agreement to fund the collection and
analysis of data to determine the
national economic impact of
cooperatives. An institution of higher
education may subcontract or
collaborate with others on the research
and data collection. A formal
consortium of academic institutions is
allowed.
Definitions
The definitions at 7 CFR 3019.2 are
incorporated by reference.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$500,000.
Floor of Award Range: None.
Ceiling of Award Range: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September
21, 2007.
Budget Period Length: 36 months.
Project Period Length: 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Applicants must be institutions of
higher education. Proposals may be
submitted by public or private colleges
or universities, research foundations
maintained by a college or university, or
private nonprofit organizations funded
by a group of colleges or universities.
Under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995, an organization described in
section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(4))
which engages in lobbying activities, is
not eligible to apply.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required but
are highly encouraged. Applicants must
verify in their applications that
matching funds are available for the
time period of the agreement if the
matching funds are required to complete
the project. Matching funds must be
provided by either the applicant or by
a third party in the form of cash or in-
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45727
kind contributions. Matching funds
must be spent on eligible expenses and
must be from eligible sources.
C. Other Eligibility Requirements
Indirect Cost Eligibility: Public Law
110–5, ‘‘Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007’’ continues the
provision which states ‘‘No funds
appropriated by this Act may be used to
pay negotiated indirect cost rates on
cooperative agreements or similar
arrangements between the United States
Department of Agriculture and
nonprofit institutions in excess of 10
percent of the total direct cost of the
agreement when the purpose of such
cooperative arrangements is to carry out
programs of mutual interest between the
two parties.’’ Indirect costs in excess of
10 percent of the direct cost, therefore,
will be ineligible for funding.
Activity Eligibility: A cooperative
agreement reflects a relationship
between the United States Government
and an eligible recipient where the
principal purpose of the relationship is
the transfer of money, property,
services, or anything of value to the
eligible recipient to carry out the
desired research; and substantial
involvement is anticipated between
USDA Rural Development acting for the
United States Government and the
eligible recipient during the
performance of the research in the
agreement. A cooperative agreement is
not a grant. Therefore, the project
proposed must include a description of
USDA Rural Development’s substantial
participation. USDA Rural Development
may subsequently negotiate the nature
of its participation before the
cooperative agreement is executed.
Applicants that propose budgets that
include more than 10 percent of total
project costs that are ineligible for the
program will be ineligible, and the
application will not be considered for
funding. However, if an application
with 10 percent or less of ineligible
costs is selected for funding, all
ineligible costs must be removed from
the project and replaced with eligible
activities or the amount of the award
will be reduced accordingly.
Cooperative Agreement Period
Eligibility: Applications that have a
timeframe of more than 36 months will
be considered ineligible and will not be
considered for funding. Applications
that request funds for a time period
ending after September 30, 2010, will
not be considered for funding.
Completeness Eligibility: Applications
without sufficient information to
determine eligibility will not be
considered for funding. Applications
that are missing any required elements
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
45728
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / Notices
(in whole or in part) will not be
considered for funding.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address To Request Application
Package
If you plan to apply using a paper
application, you can obtain the
application package for this funding
opportunity at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm. If you plan to apply
electronically, you must visit https://
www.grants.gov and follow the
instructions.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
B. Content and Form of Submission
You may submit your application in
paper or in an electronic format. You
may view the Application Guide at
https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm.
If you submit your application in
paper form, you must submit one signed
original of your complete application
along with two additional copies.
If you submit your application
electronically, you must follow the
instructions given at https://
www.grants.gov. Applicants are advised
to visit the site well in advance of the
application deadline if they plan to
apply electronically to insure that they
have obtained the proper authentication
and have sufficient computer resources
to complete the application.
An application must contain all of the
following elements. Any application
that is missing any element or contains
an incomplete element will not be
considered for funding:
1. Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for
Federal Assistance.’’ In order for this
form to be considered complete, it must
contain the legal name of the applicant,
the applicant’s Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number, the applicant’s complete
mailing address, the name and
telephone number of a contact person,
the employer identification number
(EIN), the start and end dates of the
project, the Federal funds requested,
other funds that will be used as
matching funds, an answer to the
question, ‘‘Is applicant delinquent on
any Federal debt?’’, the name and
signature of an authorized
representative, the telephone number of
the authorized representative, and the
date the form was signed. Other
information requested on the form may
be applicable, but the above-listed
information is required for an
application to be considered complete.
The DUNS number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Aug 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
identifies business entities. Applicants
can receive a DUNS number at no cost
by accessing https://www.dnb.com/us/ or
calling (866) 705–5711.
2. Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs.’’ In order for this form to be
considered complete, the applicant
must fill out sections A, B, C, and D.
The applicant must include both
Federal and any matching funds to be
included.
3. Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—NonConstruction Programs.’’ In order for
this form to be considered complete, the
form must be signed by an authorized
official and include the title, name of
applicant, and date.
4. Title Page. The title page must
include the title of the project as well as
any other relevant identifying
information. The length should not
exceed one page.
5. Table of Contents. For ease of
locating information, each proposal
must contain a detailed Table of
Contents immediately following the title
page.
6. Executive Summary. A summary of
the proposal, not to exceed one page,
must briefly describe the project,
including goals, tasks to be completed,
and other relevant information that
provides a general overview of the
project. In the event an applicant
submits more than one page for this
element, only the first page submitted
will be considered.
7. Eligibility Discussion. A detailed
discussion, not to exceed four pages,
will describe how the applicant meets
the eligibility requirements. In the event
that more than four pages are submitted,
only the first four pages will be
considered.
i. Applicant Eligibility. The applicant
must first describe how it meets the
definition of an institution of higher
education.
ii. Purpose Eligibility. The applicant
must describe how the project purpose
is eligible for funding. The project
purpose is comprised of two
components. First, the applicant must
describe how the proposed project
consists of activities needed to
determine the national economic impact
of all types of cooperatives. Second, the
applicant must demonstrate that the
combined activities are sufficient to
estimate the national economic impact
of all types of cooperatives.
8. Proposal Narrative. The narrative
must include the following information:
i. Project Title. The title of the
proposed project must be brief, not to
exceed 75 characters, yet describe the
essentials of the project. It should match
the project title submitted on the SF–
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
424. The project title does not need to
appear on a separate page. It can be
included on the title page and/or on the
information sheet.
ii. Information Sheet. A separate onepage information sheet listing each of
the evaluation criteria referenced in this
funding announcement followed by the
page numbers of all relevant material
contained in the proposal that address
or support each criterion.
iii. Goals of the Project. A clear
statement of the ultimate goals of the
project must be included. There must be
an explanation of how economic benefit
will be measured.
iv. Workplan. The narrative must
contain a description of the project and
set forth the tasks involved in
reasonable detail. The description
should specify the activity, who will
perform the activity, during what
timeframe the activity will take place,
and the cost of the activity. Please note
that one of the proposal evaluation
criteria evaluates the workplan and
budget. Applicants should only submit
the workplan and budget once, either in
this section or as part of the workplan/
budget evaluation criterion discussion.
v. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each
of the proposal evaluation criteria
referenced in this funding
announcement must be addressed,
specifically and individually, in
narrative form.
9. Certification of Judgment.
Applicants must certify that the United
States has not obtained a judgment
against them. No Federal funds shall be
used to pay a judgment obtained by the
United States. It is suggested that
applicants use the following language
for the certification. ‘‘[INSERT NAME
OF APPLICANT] certifies that the
United States has not obtained a
judgment against it.’’ A separate
signature is not required.
10. Verification of Matching Funds.
Applicants must provide a budget to
support the workplan showing all
sources and uses of funds during the
project period. Applicants will be
required to verify any and all matching
funds, both cash and in-kind. All
proposed matching funds must be
specifically documented in the
application. If the matching funds are to
be provided by an in-kind contribution
from the applicant, the application must
include a signed letter from an
authorized representative of the
applicant verifying the goods or services
to be donated, when the goods and
services will be donated, and the value
of the goods or services. Applicants
should note that only goods or services
for which no expenditure is made can
be considered in-kind. If the applicant
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / Notices
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
is paying for goods and services as part
of the matching funds contribution, the
expenditure is considered a cash match,
and should be verified as such. If the
matching funds are to be provided by a
third party in cash, the application must
include a signed letter from that third
party verifying how much cash will be
donated and when it will be donated.
Verification for funds donated outside
the proposed time period of the
cooperative agreement will not be
accepted. If the matching funds are to be
provided by a third party in-kind
donation, the application must include
a signed letter from the third party
verifying the goods or services to be
donated, when the goods and services
will be donated, and the value of the
goods or services. Verification for inkind contributions donated outside the
proposed time period of the cooperative
agreement will not be accepted.
Verification for in-kind contributions
that are over-valued will not be
accepted. The valuation process for the
in-kind funds does not need to be
included in the application, especially if
it is lengthy, but the applicant must be
able to demonstrate how the valuation
was achieved at the time of notification
of tentative selection for the award. If
the applicant cannot satisfactorily
demonstrate how the valuation was
determined, the award may not be
made.
If matching funds are in cash, they
must be spent on goods and services
that are eligible expenditures for this
cooperative agreement program. If
matching funds are in-kind
contributions, the donated goods or
services must be considered eligible
expenditures for this program. The
matching funds must be spent or
donated during the agreement period.
(See 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019 for
funds use eligibility rules.)
If acceptable verification for all
proposed matching funds is missing
from the application by the application
deadline, the application will receive
zero points for the Funding Match part
of the evaluation criteria.
C. Submission Dates and Times
Application Deadline Date:
September 7, 2007.
Explanation of Deadlines: Paper
applications must be postmarked by the
deadline date (see section IV.F. for the
address). Final electronic applications
must be received by https://
www.grants.gov by the deadline date. If
your application does not meet the
deadline above, it will not be
considered for funding. You will be
notified whether or not your application
was received on time.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Aug 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
D. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications
Executive Order (EO) 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, does not apply to this
program.
E. Funding Restrictions
Funding restrictions apply to both
Federal funds and matching funds.
Funds may only be used for activities
related to determining the economic
impact of cooperatives.
No funds made available under this
solicitation shall be used to:
1. Pay for the preparation of the
cooperative agreement application;
2. Pay expenses not directly related to
the funded project;
3. Fund political or lobbying
activities;
4. Fund any activities prohibited by 7
CFR parts 3015 or 3019;
5. Duplicate current services or
replace or substitute support previously
provided;
6. Pay costs of the project incurred
prior to the date of agreement approval;
or
7. Pay any judgment or debt owed to
the United States.
F. Other Submission Requirements
You may submit your paper
application for a cooperative agreement
to USDA Rural Development’s
Cooperative Programs, Attn:
Cooperative Research, Mail STOP 3250,
Room 4016–South, 1400 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250–3250.
The phone number that should be used
for FedEx packages is (202) 720–7558.
You may also choose to submit your
application electronically at https://
www.grants.gov. Final applications may
not be submitted by electronic mail,
facsimile, or by hand-delivery. Each
application submission must contain all
required documents in one envelope, if
by mail or express delivery service.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
All eligible and complete applications
will be evaluated based on the following
criteria and maximum point allowances.
Failure to address any one of the
following criteria by the application
deadline will result in a determination
of incomplete and the application will
not be considered for funding. The total
points available for the set of criteria are
100.
1. Relevance of the project proposal
(30 points). Proposals will be evaluated
on how directly they address the stated
objective of demonstrating economic
impact of all types of cooperatives in the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45729
United States. Factors to be weighed by
evaluators in scoring a proposal’s
relevance will include the:
• Definition of clear and objective
measures of impact;
• Definition of specific measurement
strategies for obtaining impact measures
from each major cooperative sector and
each category of persons impacted by
cooperatives; and
• Description of sound data collection
and analysis methodology.
2. Quality of Workplan (30 points).
The quality evaluation criterion will be
based on whether the proposal outlines
a sound plan of work that will meet the
objectives in a timely and cost-efficient
manner. Factors to be weighed by
evaluators in scoring a proposal’s
workplan will include:
• How well the steps for carrying out
the work are defined;
• The logic of the sequence of
proposed steps and the likelihood they
will achieve their intended result;
• The establishment of clear
benchmarks and timetables to measure
the progress of the project;
• The detail, accuracy, and
reasonableness of the project’s proposed
budget; and
• The ability to replicate measures
from the 2006 funding cycle.
3. Quality of personnel and
management plan (20 points). The
quality of the management plan and the
personnel involved in carrying out the
proposed project will evaluate the
capabilities of the individuals and
institutions to implement the work plan
in an effective manner. Factors to be
weighed by evaluators in scoring a
proposal’s personnel and management
plan will include the:
• Experience of project leaders and
the lead institution in managing
complex research projects;
• Demonstration of a clear
understanding of business models and
general economic development;
• Management controls, progress
measurements, and reporting systems
within a structured project management
plan; and
• Experience and relevant skills of
researchers, consultants, and
subcontractors assigned to carry out
specific roles in the project.
4. Funding match and cooperative
community support (20 points). Points
will be awarded on the basis of the
percentage match provided by the
applicant and the level of support for
the proposal from the cooperative
community as evidenced by
contribution of resources to the match
and other indications of support.
• Up to 20 points will be awarded for
matching funds provided by or arranged
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
45730
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / Notices
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
for by the applicant. Two points will be
awarded for each 5 percent match, up to
a maximum of 20 points for a 50 percent
match.
B. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be initially
reviewed by Rural Development
personnel for eligibility and to
determine whether all required
elements are complete. A list of required
elements follows:
• SF–424.
• SF–424A.
• SF–424B.
• Title Page.
• Table of Contents.
• Executive Summary.
• Applicant Eligibility Discussion.
• Purpose Eligibility Discussion.
• Project Title.
• Information Sheet.
• Goals of the Project.
• Work Plan.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 1.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 2.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 3.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 4.
• Certification of Judgment.
• Verification of any Matching Funds.
Any incomplete or ineligible
applications will not be further
evaluated or considered for funding.
All eligible and complete proposals
will be evaluated by a team of at least
three reviewers based on criteria 1
through 4 described in paragraph A of
this section. Reviewers will represent
the Rural Development broad mission
area, and will include at least three
employees of USDA.
Once the scores for criteria 1 through
4 have been independently completed
by the three reviewers, the scores will
be used to rank the proposals. If the
three reviewers rank the best proposal
differently then, with the aid of a
facilitator, the three reviewers will
develop a consensus ranking. If the
three reviewers cannot reach a
consensus, two additional reviewers
will review the proposals and be added
to the rankings. A final ranking will be
obtained based on the consensus
rankings of the three member review
panel, or, if appointed, the average of
the five reviewers’ rankings. Final
award recommendation will be sent to
the Under Secretary for Rural
Development for final selection
concurrence.
After the award selection is made, all
applicants will be notified of the status
of their applications by mail. The
awardee must meet all statutory and
regulatory program requirements in
order to receive their award. In the
event that an awardee cannot meet the
requirements, the award will be
withdrawn.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Aug 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Award Date: The announcement of
award selection is expected to occur on
or about September 21, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
The successful applicant will receive
a notification of tentative selection for
funding from USDA Rural Development.
The applicant must sign a mutually
agreed to cooperative agreement and
comply with all applicable statutes,
regulations, and this notice before the
award will receive final approval.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification, including mediation
procedures and appeal rights, by mail.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
This award is subject to 7 CFR parts
3015 and 3019. These regulations may
be accessed at https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-tablesearch.html#page1.
The following additional
documentation requirements apply to
the awardee selected for this program:
• Agency Approved Cooperative
Agreement.
• Form RD 1940–1, ‘‘Request for
Obligation of Funds.’’
• Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters—Primary
Covered Transactions.’’
• Form AD–1048, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—
Lower Tier Covered Transactions.’’
• Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification
Regarding a Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements (Grants).’’
• Form RD 400–1, ‘‘Equal
Opportunity Agreement.’’
• Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance
Agreement.’’
Additional information on these
requirements can be found at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm.
Reporting Requirements: You must
provide USDA Rural Development with
an original or an electronic copy that
includes all required signatures of the
following reports. The reports should be
submitted to the Agency contact listed
on your Cooperative Agreement. Failure
to submit satisfactory reports on time
may result in suspension or termination
of your award.
1. Form SF–269 or SF–269A. A
‘‘Financial Status Report,’’ listing
expenditures according to agreed upon
budget categories, on a quarterly basis.
Reporting periods end each December
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31, March 31, June 30, and September
30. Reports are due 30 days after the
reporting period ends.
2. Quarterly performance reports that
compare accomplishments to the
objectives stated in the proposal.
Identify all tasks completed to date and
provide documentation supporting the
reported results. If the original schedule
provided in the workplan is not being
met, the report should discuss the
problems or delays that may affect
completion of the project. Objectives for
the next reporting period should be
listed. Compliance with any special
condition on the use of award funds
should be discussed. Reporting periods
end each December 31, March 31, June
30, and September 30. Reports are due
30 days after the reporting period ends.
Supporting documentation must also be
submitted for completed tasks. The
supporting documentation for
completed tasks include, but are not
limited to, questionnaire or interview
guides, publications of research
findings, summaries of data collected,
and any other documentation related to
how funds were spent.
3. Final Project performance reports
that compare accomplishments to the
objectives stated in the proposal.
Identify all tasks completed and provide
documentation supporting the reported
results. If the original schedule provided
in the workplan was not met, the report
must discuss the problems or delays
that affected completion of the project.
Compliance with any special condition
on the use of award funds should be
discussed. Supporting documentation
for completed tasks must also be
submitted. The supporting
documentation for completed tasks
include, but are not limited to,
publications of research findings,
summaries of data collected,
documentation of data and software
delivered to USDA Rural Development,
and any other documentation related to
how funds were spent. The final
performance report is due within 90
days of the completion of the project.
VII. Agency Contacts
For general questions about this
announcement and for program
technical assistance, please contact the
USDA Rural Development’s Cooperative
Programs, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016–
South, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250–3250,
Telephone: (202) 690–0368 (TDD: (800)
877–8339 Federal Information Relay
Service), e-mail:
cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / Notices
VIII. Non-Discrimination Statement
USDA prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, age,
disability, and where applicable, sex,
marital status, familial status, parental
status, religion, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an
individual’s income is derived from any
public assistance program. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–
2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to
USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call
(800) 795–3272 (voice), or (202) 720–
6382 (TDD). ‘‘USDA is an equal
opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.’’
Dated: August 9, 2007.
Leann M. Oliver,
Acting Administrator, Rural Business—
Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. E7–15959 Filed 8–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notice of Meeting
DC 20230; Telephone: 202–482–0399;
Fax: 202–482–5834; e-mail:
paulette.hernandez@mail.doc.gov.
The
roundtable discussion on identity
management and international business
competitiveness will look at: (1) The
need for improvements in existing
identity management practices; (2) the
impact of identity management on
business competitiveness and the ability
of businesses to use electronic
commerce to enhance international
trade; (3) industry best practices in
identity management and challenges
associated with promulgating these best
practices; (4) the trade-related
implications of identity management;
and (5) ways to create an identity
management landscape that balances
the needs of consumers, industry, and
government and enables the growth of ecommerce. ITA will host a group of
twenty experts in the field of identity
management to hold this discussion. In
addition, we intend to include up to
thirty additional individuals to
participate as part of the audience.
Space is limited for both panelists and
audience participants. ITA will select
panelists and audience participants
with a view to ensuring broad
representation from industry,
government, academia, and civil
society. This roundtable will be closed
to the press.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: August 10, 2007.
Robin Layton,
Director, Office of Technology and Electronic
Commerce.
[FR Doc. E7–16048 Filed 8–14–07; 8:45 am]
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Meeting notice.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
The Department of
Commerce’s International Trade
Administration (ITA) would like to raise
awareness about the importance of
identity management to innovation,
economic growth, and international
trade. Toward that end, ITA will host a
roundtable discussion on identity
management and international business
competitiveness on Tuesday, September
18, 2007. The roundtable is intended to
facilitate a candid discussion of
individual views by a representative
group of experts on this important issue.
DATES: September 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Inquiries about
participation in the roundtable should
be addressed to the contact below, and
received by close of business on
Monday, August 20, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paulette Hernandez, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Office of Technology and
Electronic Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room 4324, Washington,
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Aug 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Membership of the Office of the
Secretary Performance Review Board
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of membership on the
Office of the Secretary Performance
Review Board.
45731
Secretary Performance Review Board is
upon publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise A. Yaag, Director, Office of
Executive Resources, Office of Human
Resources Management, Office of the
Director, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–
3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
names, position titles, and type of
appointment of the members of the OS/
PRB are set forth below by organization:
Office of the Secretary 2007–2009
Performance Review Board
Membership
Office of the Secretary
Tracey S. Rhodes, Director, Executive
Secretariat.
Office of Assistant Secretary for
Administration
Fred Fanning, Director for
Administrative Services.
Barbara Retzlaff, Director, Office of
Budget (Alternate).
Bureau of Industry and Security
Mark M. Foulon, Deputy Under
Secretary for Industry and Security.
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
W. Todd Grams, Chief Financial
Office for NIST.
Office of the General Counsel
Michael A. Levitt, Assistant General
Counsel for Legislation and Regulation.
Joan Maginnis, Assistant General
Counsel for Finance and Litigation
(Alternate).
Dated: July 20, 2007.
Denise A. Yaag,
Director, Office of Executive Resources.
[FR Doc. 07–3990 Filed 8–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–BS–M
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.,
4314(c)(4), Department of Commerce
(DOC) announces the appointment of
persons to serve as members of the
Office of the Secretary (OS) Performance
Review Board (PRB). The OS PRB is
responsible for reviewing performance
Ratings, pay adjustments and bonuses of
Senior Executive Service (SES)
members. The term of the new members
of the OS PRB will expire December 31,
2009.
Effective Date: The effective date of
service of appointees to the Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Membership of the Departmental
Performance Review Board
Department of Commerce.
Notice of membership on the
Departmental Performance Review
Board.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.,
4314(c)(4), Department of Commerce
(DOC) announces the appointment of
persons to serve as members of the
Departmental Performance Review
Board (DPRB). The DPRB provides an
objective peer review of the initial
performance ratings, performance-based
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45726-45731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15959]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business--Cooperative Service
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year 2007 Funding Opportunity for
Research on the Economic Impact of Cooperatives
AGENCY: Rural Business--Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial Notice of request for proposals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Rural Business--Cooperative Service programs are administered
through USDA Rural Development. USDA Rural Development announces the
availability of approximately $500,000 in competitive cooperative
agreement funds for fiscal year (FY) 2007 to conduct research on the
national economic impact of all types of cooperatives. USDA Rural
Development hereby requests proposals from institutions of higher
education interested in applying for a competitively awarded
cooperative research agreement. This funding is a follow on to funding
awarded in FY 2006, the intent of which was to encourage research on
the critical issue of the economic value of cooperatives. Funding for
FY 2007 is expected to replicate and expand upon research undertaken
with FY 2006 funds.
DATES: Interested parties may submit completed applications for the
cooperative agreement on paper or electronically according to the
following deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent
overnight no later than September 7, 2007, to be eligible for FY 2007
funding. Electronic copies must be received by September 7, 2007, to be
eligible for FY 2007 funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY
2007 funding.
ADDRESSES: Applicants may obtain application forms, guides, and
materials for the cooperative agreement at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/
rbs/coops/reic.htm or by contacting USDA Rural Development at (202)
690-0368, (TDD: (800) 877-8339, Federal Information Relay Service) and
ask for the cooperative research agreement application kit.
Submit completed paper applications for a cooperative agreement to
USDA Rural Development's Cooperative Programs, Attn: Cooperative
Research, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016-South, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250-3250. The phone number that should be used
for FedEx packages is (202) 720-7558.
Submit electronic applications at https://www.grants.gov, following
the instructions found on this Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit the program Web site at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm, which contains application
guidance, including an Application Guide and application forms. Or you
may contact USDA Rural Development at (202) 690-0368 (TDD: (800) 877-
8339 Federal Information Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq., OMB
must approve all ``collections of information'' by USDA Rural
Development. The Act defines ``collection of information'' as a
requirement for ``answers to * * * identical reporting or recordkeeping
requirements imposed on ten or more persons * * *.'' (44 U.S.C.
3502(3)(A)) Because the RFP will receive less than 10 respondents, the
Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply.
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural Business--Cooperative Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Research on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives.
Announcement Type: Initial announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10.778
Dates: You may submit completed applications for the cooperative
agreement on paper or electronically according to the following
deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent
overnight no later than September 7, 2007, to be eligible for FY 2007
funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2007 funding.
Electronic copies must be received by September 7, 2007, to be
eligible for FY 2007 funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY
2007 funding.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13): There is no
public reporting burden associated with this notice.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
This solicitation is issued pursuant to the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5) directing funds ``for a
cooperative research agreement with a qualified academic institution to
conduct research on the national economic impact of all types of
cooperatives.'' The Secretary of Agriculture has delegated the
program's administration to USDA Rural Development.
The primary objective of this cooperative research agreement
program is to facilitate university research on the national economic
impact of cooperatives. The research program will need to develop a
web-based methodology to enable cooperatives to enter financial and
other impact data on a periodic basis; apply the methodology to collect
data updates estimates of economic impact of cooperatives; analyze the
impact of cooperatives on local wealth creation and retention, and
analyze the total returns to investment in cooperatives.
The cooperative agreement proposal must address how the following
deliverables will be provided:
1. An analysis of how and the extent to which cooperatives
facilitate the creation and retention of wealth within the local
communities they serve. The analysis should include the identification
of cooperative models and practices that could enhance cooperative
contribution to local wealth creation. An estimate of cooperative
wealth creation should be made for the U.S. and for each of the
following four categories or classes of cooperatives:
i. Commercial sales or marketing--includes farm supply and
marketing, grocery and consumer goods, business-to-business, the
emerging ethanol and biofuels related industry, and manufacturing.
ii. Social and public services--includes housing, health care, day
care/elder care, transportation, and educational services.
iii. Financial services--includes credit unions, banks, and mutual
insurance.
iv. Utilities--includes electric, telephone, water, waste, and
other regulated utilities.
2. An analysis of the total returns to investment in cooperatives,
including returns to the cooperative businesses at the enterprise level
as well as the impact of cooperative returns and services to the
cooperatives' members at their enterprise levels. Total returns to
investment should be analyzed using the same classification scheme as
described in Deliverable 1 above.
[[Page 45727]]
3. The development of web-based systems for the collection and
assembly of basic impact data on a periodic basis. These systems should
facilitate the direct entry of financial and economic impact data by
individual cooperatives. This methodology will need to account for
cooperative organizational complexity, such as a single organization's
several local, regional, and national locations, as well as sector
differences.
4. The application of the web-based systems, coupled with other
available data, to provide an update of data on the economic impact of
cooperatives estimated under the FY 2006 funding. This update should
cover the calendar year two years after the year for which estimates
were made under the FY 2006 research. As final output of the FY 2006
research will likely not be available before January 2009, USDA Rural
Development will arrange for the winner of this competition to obtain
updates and preliminary data from the University of Wisconsin, the FY
2006 award recipient, as progress is being made on the FY 2006
research. Data items to be collected/measured must include:
Number and headquarters location of cooperatives,
Volume measures appropriate for each sector (revenues,
dollar value, and other appropriate size indicators),
Number of persons impacted by the cooperative (members,
patrons, or investors), and;
Number of full-time equivalent jobs and other economic
impact variables.
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
(if multiple apply, use code that corresponds to highest revenue).
Sectors for which summary data should be prepared include:
Housing,
Health Care,
Daycare/Elder Care,
Financial Services,
Grocery/Consumer Retail,
Business-to-Business (Wholesaling, Manufacturing),
Agricultural Marketing (Including Organic and
Conventional),
Agricultural Supplies and Services,
Public Services (Including Transportation and Education),
Renewable Energy, and
Utilities.
5. The population of a database for individual cooperative and
summary data collected. The database is to be delivered to USDA Rural
Development. USDA Rural Development will work with the grantee to
integrate data from this deliverable into existing database
applications.
6. The performance of subcontracting services, oversight, and
financial controls for the overall project.
7. The submission of quarterly progress reports and quarterly
financial reports to USDA Rural Development; and
8. The preparation and submission of publishable quality written
reports for Deliverables 1, 2 and 4 to USDA Rural Development.
USDA Rural Development will competitively award one cooperative
agreement to fund the collection and analysis of data to determine the
national economic impact of cooperatives. An institution of higher
education may subcontract or collaborate with others on the research
and data collection. A formal consortium of academic institutions is
allowed.
Definitions
The definitions at 7 CFR 3019.2 are incorporated by reference.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $500,000.
Floor of Award Range: None.
Ceiling of Award Range: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September 21, 2007.
Budget Period Length: 36 months.
Project Period Length: 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Applicants must be institutions of higher education. Proposals may
be submitted by public or private colleges or universities, research
foundations maintained by a college or university, or private nonprofit
organizations funded by a group of colleges or universities. Under the
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, an organization described in section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(4))
which engages in lobbying activities, is not eligible to apply.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required but are highly encouraged.
Applicants must verify in their applications that matching funds are
available for the time period of the agreement if the matching funds
are required to complete the project. Matching funds must be provided
by either the applicant or by a third party in the form of cash or in-
kind contributions. Matching funds must be spent on eligible expenses
and must be from eligible sources.
C. Other Eligibility Requirements
Indirect Cost Eligibility: Public Law 110-5, ``Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007'' continues the provision which states
``No funds appropriated by this Act may be used to pay negotiated
indirect cost rates on cooperative agreements or similar arrangements
between the United States Department of Agriculture and nonprofit
institutions in excess of 10 percent of the total direct cost of the
agreement when the purpose of such cooperative arrangements is to carry
out programs of mutual interest between the two parties.'' Indirect
costs in excess of 10 percent of the direct cost, therefore, will be
ineligible for funding.
Activity Eligibility: A cooperative agreement reflects a
relationship between the United States Government and an eligible
recipient where the principal purpose of the relationship is the
transfer of money, property, services, or anything of value to the
eligible recipient to carry out the desired research; and substantial
involvement is anticipated between USDA Rural Development acting for
the United States Government and the eligible recipient during the
performance of the research in the agreement. A cooperative agreement
is not a grant. Therefore, the project proposed must include a
description of USDA Rural Development's substantial participation. USDA
Rural Development may subsequently negotiate the nature of its
participation before the cooperative agreement is executed.
Applicants that propose budgets that include more than 10 percent
of total project costs that are ineligible for the program will be
ineligible, and the application will not be considered for funding.
However, if an application with 10 percent or less of ineligible costs
is selected for funding, all ineligible costs must be removed from the
project and replaced with eligible activities or the amount of the
award will be reduced accordingly.
Cooperative Agreement Period Eligibility: Applications that have a
timeframe of more than 36 months will be considered ineligible and will
not be considered for funding. Applications that request funds for a
time period ending after September 30, 2010, will not be considered for
funding.
Completeness Eligibility: Applications without sufficient
information to determine eligibility will not be considered for
funding. Applications that are missing any required elements
[[Page 45728]]
(in whole or in part) will not be considered for funding.
IV. Application and Submission Information
A. Address To Request Application Package
If you plan to apply using a paper application, you can obtain the
application package for this funding opportunity at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm. If you plan to apply
electronically, you must visit https://www.grants.gov and follow the
instructions.
B. Content and Form of Submission
You may submit your application in paper or in an electronic
format. You may view the Application Guide at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm.
If you submit your application in paper form, you must submit one
signed original of your complete application along with two additional
copies.
If you submit your application electronically, you must follow the
instructions given at https://www.grants.gov. Applicants are advised to
visit the site well in advance of the application deadline if they plan
to apply electronically to insure that they have obtained the proper
authentication and have sufficient computer resources to complete the
application.
An application must contain all of the following elements. Any
application that is missing any element or contains an incomplete
element will not be considered for funding:
1. Form SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance.'' In order
for this form to be considered complete, it must contain the legal name
of the applicant, the applicant's Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number, the applicant's complete mailing
address, the name and telephone number of a contact person, the
employer identification number (EIN), the start and end dates of the
project, the Federal funds requested, other funds that will be used as
matching funds, an answer to the question, ``Is applicant delinquent on
any Federal debt?'', the name and signature of an authorized
representative, the telephone number of the authorized representative,
and the date the form was signed. Other information requested on the
form may be applicable, but the above-listed information is required
for an application to be considered complete.
The DUNS number is a nine-digit identification number, which
uniquely identifies business entities. Applicants can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by accessing https://www.dnb.com/us/ or calling (866)
705-5711.
2. Form SF-424A, ``Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs.''
In order for this form to be considered complete, the applicant must
fill out sections A, B, C, and D. The applicant must include both
Federal and any matching funds to be included.
3. Form SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs.'' In
order for this form to be considered complete, the form must be signed
by an authorized official and include the title, name of applicant, and
date.
4. Title Page. The title page must include the title of the project
as well as any other relevant identifying information. The length
should not exceed one page.
5. Table of Contents. For ease of locating information, each
proposal must contain a detailed Table of Contents immediately
following the title page.
6. Executive Summary. A summary of the proposal, not to exceed one
page, must briefly describe the project, including goals, tasks to be
completed, and other relevant information that provides a general
overview of the project. In the event an applicant submits more than
one page for this element, only the first page submitted will be
considered.
7. Eligibility Discussion. A detailed discussion, not to exceed
four pages, will describe how the applicant meets the eligibility
requirements. In the event that more than four pages are submitted,
only the first four pages will be considered.
i. Applicant Eligibility. The applicant must first describe how it
meets the definition of an institution of higher education.
ii. Purpose Eligibility. The applicant must describe how the
project purpose is eligible for funding. The project purpose is
comprised of two components. First, the applicant must describe how the
proposed project consists of activities needed to determine the
national economic impact of all types of cooperatives. Second, the
applicant must demonstrate that the combined activities are sufficient
to estimate the national economic impact of all types of cooperatives.
8. Proposal Narrative. The narrative must include the following
information:
i. Project Title. The title of the proposed project must be brief,
not to exceed 75 characters, yet describe the essentials of the
project. It should match the project title submitted on the SF-424. The
project title does not need to appear on a separate page. It can be
included on the title page and/or on the information sheet.
ii. Information Sheet. A separate one-page information sheet
listing each of the evaluation criteria referenced in this funding
announcement followed by the page numbers of all relevant material
contained in the proposal that address or support each criterion.
iii. Goals of the Project. A clear statement of the ultimate goals
of the project must be included. There must be an explanation of how
economic benefit will be measured.
iv. Workplan. The narrative must contain a description of the
project and set forth the tasks involved in reasonable detail. The
description should specify the activity, who will perform the activity,
during what timeframe the activity will take place, and the cost of the
activity. Please note that one of the proposal evaluation criteria
evaluates the workplan and budget. Applicants should only submit the
workplan and budget once, either in this section or as part of the
workplan/budget evaluation criterion discussion.
v. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each of the proposal evaluation
criteria referenced in this funding announcement must be addressed,
specifically and individually, in narrative form.
9. Certification of Judgment. Applicants must certify that the
United States has not obtained a judgment against them. No Federal
funds shall be used to pay a judgment obtained by the United States. It
is suggested that applicants use the following language for the
certification. ``[INSERT NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that the United
States has not obtained a judgment against it.'' A separate signature
is not required.
10. Verification of Matching Funds. Applicants must provide a
budget to support the workplan showing all sources and uses of funds
during the project period. Applicants will be required to verify any
and all matching funds, both cash and in-kind. All proposed matching
funds must be specifically documented in the application. If the
matching funds are to be provided by an in-kind contribution from the
applicant, the application must include a signed letter from an
authorized representative of the applicant verifying the goods or
services to be donated, when the goods and services will be donated,
and the value of the goods or services. Applicants should note that
only goods or services for which no expenditure is made can be
considered in-kind. If the applicant
[[Page 45729]]
is paying for goods and services as part of the matching funds
contribution, the expenditure is considered a cash match, and should be
verified as such. If the matching funds are to be provided by a third
party in cash, the application must include a signed letter from that
third party verifying how much cash will be donated and when it will be
donated. Verification for funds donated outside the proposed time
period of the cooperative agreement will not be accepted. If the
matching funds are to be provided by a third party in-kind donation,
the application must include a signed letter from the third party
verifying the goods or services to be donated, when the goods and
services will be donated, and the value of the goods or services.
Verification for in-kind contributions donated outside the proposed
time period of the cooperative agreement will not be accepted.
Verification for in-kind contributions that are over-valued will not be
accepted. The valuation process for the in-kind funds does not need to
be included in the application, especially if it is lengthy, but the
applicant must be able to demonstrate how the valuation was achieved at
the time of notification of tentative selection for the award. If the
applicant cannot satisfactorily demonstrate how the valuation was
determined, the award may not be made.
If matching funds are in cash, they must be spent on goods and
services that are eligible expenditures for this cooperative agreement
program. If matching funds are in-kind contributions, the donated goods
or services must be considered eligible expenditures for this program.
The matching funds must be spent or donated during the agreement
period. (See 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019 for funds use eligibility
rules.)
If acceptable verification for all proposed matching funds is
missing from the application by the application deadline, the
application will receive zero points for the Funding Match part of the
evaluation criteria.
C. Submission Dates and Times
Application Deadline Date: September 7, 2007.
Explanation of Deadlines: Paper applications must be postmarked by
the deadline date (see section IV.F. for the address). Final electronic
applications must be received by https://www.grants.gov by the deadline
date. If your application does not meet the deadline above, it will not
be considered for funding. You will be notified whether or not your
application was received on time.
D. Intergovernmental Review of Applications
Executive Order (EO) 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, does not apply to this program.
E. Funding Restrictions
Funding restrictions apply to both Federal funds and matching
funds. Funds may only be used for activities related to determining the
economic impact of cooperatives.
No funds made available under this solicitation shall be used to:
1. Pay for the preparation of the cooperative agreement
application;
2. Pay expenses not directly related to the funded project;
3. Fund political or lobbying activities;
4. Fund any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 or 3019;
5. Duplicate current services or replace or substitute support
previously provided;
6. Pay costs of the project incurred prior to the date of agreement
approval; or
7. Pay any judgment or debt owed to the United States.
F. Other Submission Requirements
You may submit your paper application for a cooperative agreement
to USDA Rural Development's Cooperative Programs, Attn: Cooperative
Research, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016-South, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-3250. The phone number that should be used for
FedEx packages is (202) 720-7558. You may also choose to submit your
application electronically at https://www.grants.gov. Final applications
may not be submitted by electronic mail, facsimile, or by hand-
delivery. Each application submission must contain all required
documents in one envelope, if by mail or express delivery service.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
All eligible and complete applications will be evaluated based on
the following criteria and maximum point allowances. Failure to address
any one of the following criteria by the application deadline will
result in a determination of incomplete and the application will not be
considered for funding. The total points available for the set of
criteria are 100.
1. Relevance of the project proposal (30 points). Proposals will be
evaluated on how directly they address the stated objective of
demonstrating economic impact of all types of cooperatives in the
United States. Factors to be weighed by evaluators in scoring a
proposal's relevance will include the:
Definition of clear and objective measures of impact;
Definition of specific measurement strategies for
obtaining impact measures from each major cooperative sector and each
category of persons impacted by cooperatives; and
Description of sound data collection and analysis
methodology.
2. Quality of Workplan (30 points). The quality evaluation
criterion will be based on whether the proposal outlines a sound plan
of work that will meet the objectives in a timely and cost-efficient
manner. Factors to be weighed by evaluators in scoring a proposal's
workplan will include:
How well the steps for carrying out the work are defined;
The logic of the sequence of proposed steps and the
likelihood they will achieve their intended result;
The establishment of clear benchmarks and timetables to
measure the progress of the project;
The detail, accuracy, and reasonableness of the project's
proposed budget; and
The ability to replicate measures from the 2006 funding
cycle.
3. Quality of personnel and management plan (20 points). The
quality of the management plan and the personnel involved in carrying
out the proposed project will evaluate the capabilities of the
individuals and institutions to implement the work plan in an effective
manner. Factors to be weighed by evaluators in scoring a proposal's
personnel and management plan will include the:
Experience of project leaders and the lead institution in
managing complex research projects;
Demonstration of a clear understanding of business models
and general economic development;
Management controls, progress measurements, and reporting
systems within a structured project management plan; and
Experience and relevant skills of researchers,
consultants, and subcontractors assigned to carry out specific roles in
the project.
4. Funding match and cooperative community support (20 points).
Points will be awarded on the basis of the percentage match provided by
the applicant and the level of support for the proposal from the
cooperative community as evidenced by contribution of resources to the
match and other indications of support.
Up to 20 points will be awarded for matching funds
provided by or arranged
[[Page 45730]]
for by the applicant. Two points will be awarded for each 5 percent
match, up to a maximum of 20 points for a 50 percent match.
B. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be initially reviewed by Rural Development
personnel for eligibility and to determine whether all required
elements are complete. A list of required elements follows:
SF-424.
SF-424A.
SF-424B.
Title Page.
Table of Contents.
Executive Summary.
Applicant Eligibility Discussion.
Purpose Eligibility Discussion.
Project Title.
Information Sheet.
Goals of the Project.
Work Plan.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 1.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 2.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 3.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 4.
Certification of Judgment.
Verification of any Matching Funds.
Any incomplete or ineligible applications will not be further
evaluated or considered for funding.
All eligible and complete proposals will be evaluated by a team of
at least three reviewers based on criteria 1 through 4 described in
paragraph A of this section. Reviewers will represent the Rural
Development broad mission area, and will include at least three
employees of USDA.
Once the scores for criteria 1 through 4 have been independently
completed by the three reviewers, the scores will be used to rank the
proposals. If the three reviewers rank the best proposal differently
then, with the aid of a facilitator, the three reviewers will develop a
consensus ranking. If the three reviewers cannot reach a consensus, two
additional reviewers will review the proposals and be added to the
rankings. A final ranking will be obtained based on the consensus
rankings of the three member review panel, or, if appointed, the
average of the five reviewers' rankings. Final award recommendation
will be sent to the Under Secretary for Rural Development for final
selection concurrence.
After the award selection is made, all applicants will be notified
of the status of their applications by mail. The awardee must meet all
statutory and regulatory program requirements in order to receive their
award. In the event that an awardee cannot meet the requirements, the
award will be withdrawn.
C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Award Date: The announcement of award selection is expected to
occur on or about September 21, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
The successful applicant will receive a notification of tentative
selection for funding from USDA Rural Development. The applicant must
sign a mutually agreed to cooperative agreement and comply with all
applicable statutes, regulations, and this notice before the award will
receive final approval.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification, including
mediation procedures and appeal rights, by mail.
B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
This award is subject to 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019. These
regulations may be accessed at https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-
table-search.html#page1.
The following additional documentation requirements apply to the
awardee selected for this program:
Agency Approved Cooperative Agreement.
Form RD 1940-1, ``Request for Obligation of Funds.''
Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters--Primary Covered
Transactions.''
Form AD-1048, ``Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered
Transactions.''
Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding a Drug-Free
Workplace Requirements (Grants).''
Form RD 400-1, ``Equal Opportunity Agreement.''
Form RD 400-4, ``Assurance Agreement.''
Additional information on these requirements can be found at http:/
/www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm.
Reporting Requirements: You must provide USDA Rural Development
with an original or an electronic copy that includes all required
signatures of the following reports. The reports should be submitted to
the Agency contact listed on your Cooperative Agreement. Failure to
submit satisfactory reports on time may result in suspension or
termination of your award.
1. Form SF-269 or SF-269A. A ``Financial Status Report,'' listing
expenditures according to agreed upon budget categories, on a quarterly
basis. Reporting periods end each December 31, March 31, June 30, and
September 30. Reports are due 30 days after the reporting period ends.
2. Quarterly performance reports that compare accomplishments to
the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed to
date and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the
original schedule provided in the workplan is not being met, the report
should discuss the problems or delays that may affect completion of the
project. Objectives for the next reporting period should be listed.
Compliance with any special condition on the use of award funds should
be discussed. Reporting periods end each December 31, March 31, June
30, and September 30. Reports are due 30 days after the reporting
period ends. Supporting documentation must also be submitted for
completed tasks. The supporting documentation for completed tasks
include, but are not limited to, questionnaire or interview guides,
publications of research findings, summaries of data collected, and any
other documentation related to how funds were spent.
3. Final Project performance reports that compare accomplishments
to the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed
and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the
original schedule provided in the workplan was not met, the report must
discuss the problems or delays that affected completion of the project.
Compliance with any special condition on the use of award funds should
be discussed. Supporting documentation for completed tasks must also be
submitted. The supporting documentation for completed tasks include,
but are not limited to, publications of research findings, summaries of
data collected, documentation of data and software delivered to USDA
Rural Development, and any other documentation related to how funds
were spent. The final performance report is due within 90 days of the
completion of the project.
VII. Agency Contacts
For general questions about this announcement and for program
technical assistance, please contact the USDA Rural Development's
Cooperative Programs, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016-South, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3250, Telephone: (202)
690-0368 (TDD: (800) 877-8339 Federal Information Relay Service), e-
mail: cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov.
[[Page 45731]]
VIII. Non-Discrimination Statement
USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on
the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status,
religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived
from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600
(voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA,
Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice), or (202)
720-6382 (TDD). ``USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.''
Dated: August 9, 2007.
Leann M. Oliver,
Acting Administrator, Rural Business--Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. E7-15959 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P