Certification Process for State Capital Counsel Systems, 44816 [E7-15254]
Download as PDF
44816
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 153 / Thursday, August 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM CO, E5 Springfield, CO [New]
Springfield Municipal Airport, CO
(Lat. 37°27′56″ N., long. 102°37′14″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.0-mile
radius of Springfield Municipal Airport; that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet
above the surface beginning at TOBE
VORTAC, thence north along V–169 to lat.
38°34′00″ N., thence to lat. 38°34′00″ N.,
long. 102°00′00″ W., thence to lat. 36°30′00″
N., long. 102°00′00″ W., thence west on lat.
36°30′00″ N. to V–81, thence northwest along
V–81 to point of beginning.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 25,
2007.
Clark Desing,
Manager, System Support Group, Western
Service Area.
[FR Doc. E7–15578 Filed 8–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. OJP (DOJ)–1464]
RIN 1121–AA74
Certification Process for State Capital
Counsel Systems
Department of Justice.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On June 6, 2007, the
Department of Justice published a notice
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register, 72 FR 31217, concerning a
process for certifying state systems for
providing counsel to indigent capital
defendants. That rulemaking was issued
pursuant to section 507 of the USA
PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act. The original 60day comment period expired on August
6, 2007. The Department is reopening
the comment period for an additional
45-day period.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please address all
comments, by U.S. mail, to: Ms. Danica
Szarvas-Kidd, Policy Advisor for
Adjudication, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Office of Justice Programs,
U.S. Department of Justice, 810 7th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531; by
telefacsimile (fax), to: (202) 307–0036 or
by e-mail, to:
OJP_Fed_Reg_Comments@usdoj.gov. To
ensure proper handling, please
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Aug 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
reference OJP Docket No.1464 on your
correspondence. You may view an
electronic version of the proposed rule
at www.regulations.gov, and you may
also comment by using the
www.regulations.gov comment form.
When submitting comments
electronically you must include OJP
Docket No. 1464 in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Danica Szarvas-Kidd (Policy Advisor for
Adjudication), (202) 305–7418. This is
not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6,
2007, the Department of Justice
(Department) published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register, 72 FR 31217, in order to
promulgate regulations pursuant to
Public Law 109–177, the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act
of 2005, (‘‘the Act’’). Section 507 of the
Act amends chapter 154 of title 28 of the
United States Code. Chapter 154
provides expedited Federal habeas
corpus review procedures in capital
cases for States that establish a
mechanism for providing counsel to
indigent capital defendants in state
postconviction proceedings that satisfies
certain statutory requirements. The Act
amended sections 2261(b) and 2265 of
title 28 to assign responsibility to the
Attorney General of the United States
for certification of a State’s satisfaction
of the requirements for the application
of chapter 154 , subject to review by the
Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit. Section 2265(a) as
amended makes clear that the only
requirements that the Attorney General
may impose for a state to receive
certification are those expressly stated
in chapter 154. See 28 U.S.C. 2265(a)(3)
(‘‘[t]here are no requirements for
certification or for application of this
chapter other than those expressly
stated in this chapter’’). As a result, the
rule in large measure simply recounts
and provides illustration relating to the
express statutory requirements,
addresses some limited interpretive
questions, and outlines a procedure for
States’ requests for certification.
The Department consulted with a
number of groups in developing this
proposed rule to carry out the statutory
directive, including representatives of
state officials and both prosecution and
defense interests concerned with capital
case litigation. Notwithstanding the
limited nature of the matters to be
determined in the rule, the extensive
consultation concerning these matters
with interested officials and
organizations, and the normal 60-day
period for comment provided in the rule
as originally published, a number of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
organizations involved in capital
defense or advocacy activities have
requested additional time for comment.
While the justification for the requested
extensions is at best marginal in light of
the considerations noted above, and
extending the time for comment will
further delay realization of the
legislative objectives reflected in
chapter 154 of title 28, the Department
nevertheless wishes to ensure ample
opportunity for provision of input by
interested groups and members of the
public.
Further, some technical problems
arose because of the recent transition of
the Department to using the
Regulations.gov Web site (https://
www.regulations.gov) to post public
comments on rulemakings. These
problems with using Regulations.gov
have now been resolved and public
comments received by the Department
are posted for public viewing in a timely
manner. However, there was a short
period when public comments received
by the Department and posted by
Department personnel to the
Regulations.gov site were not viewable
by the public.
Accordingly, the Department is
reopening the public comment period
and will accept comments for an
additional 45 days after publication of
this notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dated: August 1, 2007.
Cybele Daley,
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of
Justice Programs.
[FR Doc. E7–15254 Filed 8–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2007–0620; FRL–8450–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of Kansas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of
Kansas for the purpose of including the
Kansas City 8-hour ozone maintenance
plan into the SIP. Section 110(a)(1) of
the Clean Air Act requires that areas
which were maintenance areas for the 1hour ozone standard and attainment for
the 8-hour ozone standard develop a
plan showing how the state will
maintain the ozone standard for the
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 153 (Thursday, August 9, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 44816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15254]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. OJP (DOJ)-1464]
RIN 1121-AA74
Certification Process for State Capital Counsel Systems
AGENCY: Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 6, 2007, the Department of Justice published a notice
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, 72 FR 31217, concerning
a process for certifying state systems for providing counsel to
indigent capital defendants. That rulemaking was issued pursuant to
section 507 of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act. The
original 60-day comment period expired on August 6, 2007. The
Department is reopening the comment period for an additional 45-day
period.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please address all comments, by U.S. mail, to: Ms. Danica
Szarvas-Kidd, Policy Advisor for Adjudication, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810
7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531; by telefacsimile (fax), to:
(202) 307-0036 or by e-mail, to: OJP--Fed--Reg--Comments@usdoj.gov. To
ensure proper handling, please reference OJP Docket No.1464 on your
correspondence. You may view an electronic version of the proposed rule
at www.regulations.gov, and you may also comment by using the
www.regulations.gov comment form. When submitting comments
electronically you must include OJP Docket No. 1464 in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danica Szarvas-Kidd (Policy Advisor
for Adjudication), (202) 305-7418. This is not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2007, the Department of Justice
(Department) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register, 72 FR 31217, in order to promulgate regulations pursuant to
Public Law 109-177, the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act
of 2005, (``the Act''). Section 507 of the Act amends chapter 154 of
title 28 of the United States Code. Chapter 154 provides expedited
Federal habeas corpus review procedures in capital cases for States
that establish a mechanism for providing counsel to indigent capital
defendants in state postconviction proceedings that satisfies certain
statutory requirements. The Act amended sections 2261(b) and 2265 of
title 28 to assign responsibility to the Attorney General of the United
States for certification of a State's satisfaction of the requirements
for the application of chapter 154 , subject to review by the Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Section 2265(a) as
amended makes clear that the only requirements that the Attorney
General may impose for a state to receive certification are those
expressly stated in chapter 154. See 28 U.S.C. 2265(a)(3) (``[t]here
are no requirements for certification or for application of this
chapter other than those expressly stated in this chapter''). As a
result, the rule in large measure simply recounts and provides
illustration relating to the express statutory requirements, addresses
some limited interpretive questions, and outlines a procedure for
States' requests for certification.
The Department consulted with a number of groups in developing this
proposed rule to carry out the statutory directive, including
representatives of state officials and both prosecution and defense
interests concerned with capital case litigation. Notwithstanding the
limited nature of the matters to be determined in the rule, the
extensive consultation concerning these matters with interested
officials and organizations, and the normal 60-day period for comment
provided in the rule as originally published, a number of organizations
involved in capital defense or advocacy activities have requested
additional time for comment. While the justification for the requested
extensions is at best marginal in light of the considerations noted
above, and extending the time for comment will further delay
realization of the legislative objectives reflected in chapter 154 of
title 28, the Department nevertheless wishes to ensure ample
opportunity for provision of input by interested groups and members of
the public.
Further, some technical problems arose because of the recent
transition of the Department to using the Regulations.gov Web site
(https://www.regulations.gov) to post public comments on rulemakings.
These problems with using Regulations.gov have now been resolved and
public comments received by the Department are posted for public
viewing in a timely manner. However, there was a short period when
public comments received by the Department and posted by Department
personnel to the Regulations.gov site were not viewable by the public.
Accordingly, the Department is reopening the public comment period
and will accept comments for an additional 45 days after publication of
this notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dated: August 1, 2007.
Cybele Daley,
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-15254 Filed 8-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P