Notice of Limitation on Claims For the Big Bear Bridge Replacement Project, San Bernardino National Forest, California, 44217-44218 [E7-15267]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 7, 2007 / Notices
150 or through FAA’s review of noise
exposure maps. Therefore, the
responsibility for the detailed
overlaying of noise exposure contours
onto the map depicting properties on
the surface rests exclusively with the
airport operator that submitted those
maps, or with those public agencies and
planning agencies with which
consultation is required under section
47503 of the Act. The FAA has relied on
the certification by the airport operator,
under section 150.21 of FAR Part 150,
that the statutorily required consultation
has been accomplished.
The FAA has formerly received the
noise compatibility program for Baton
Rouge Metropolitan Airport, also
effective on July 30, 2007. Preliminary
review of the submitted material
indicates that it conforms to the
requirements for the submittal of noise
compatibility programs, but that further
review will be necessary prior to
approval or disapproval of the program.
The formal review period, limited by
law to a maximum of 180 days, will be
completed on or before January 25,
2008.
The FAA’s detailed evaluation will be
conducted under the provisions of 14
CFR part 150, section 150.33. The
primary considerations in the
evaluation process are whether the
proposed measures may reduce the level
of aviation safety, create an undue
burden on interstate or foreign
commerce, or be reasonably consistent
with obtaining the goal of reducing
existing non-compatible land uses and
preventing the introduction of
additional non-compatible land uses.
Interested persons are invited to
comment on the proposed program with
specific reference to these factors. All
comments, other than those properly
addressed to local land use authorities,
will be considered by the FAA to the
extent practicable. Copies of the noise
exposure maps, the FAA’s evaluation of
the maps, and the proposed noise
compatibility program are available for
examination at the following locations:
Federal Aviation Administration,
Planning and Programming Branch,
Room 697, 2601 Meacham Boulevard,
Forth Worth, TX 76137–4298 and Mr.
Anthony Marino, 9430 Jackie Cochran
Dr., Suite 300, Baton Rouge, LA 70807.
Questions may be directed to the
individual named above under the
heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 07–3846 Filed 8–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:56 Aug 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Limitation on Claims For the
Big Bear Bridge Replacement Project,
San Bernardino National Forest,
California
U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA).
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
actions taken by the FHWA and other
Federal agencies that are final within
the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
These actions relate to a proposed
bridge replacement project in the San
Bernardino National Forest, California.
The federal actions grant approvals and
authorize funding for the project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C.(l)(1). A
claim seeking judicial review of the
Federal agency actions on the bridge
replacement project will be barred
unless a claim is filed on February 4,
2008. If the Federal law that authorizes
judicial review of a claim provides a
time period less than 180 days for filing
such claim, then that shorter time
period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cohen, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Federal Highway
Administration, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite
4–100, Sacramento, CA 95814,
weekdays between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
(Pacific Time), telephone (916) 498–
5868, e-mail: David.Cohen@dot.gov; Tay
Dam, Project Development Engineer,
Federal Highway Administration, 888 S.
Figueroa, Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA
90017, telephone (213) 202–3954,
e-mail: Tay.Dam@dot.gov; Mr. Boniface
Udotor, Senior Environmental Planner,
Caltrans District 8, 464 West 4th Street,
San Bernardino, CA 92401, telephone
(909) 388–1387, e-mail:
Boniface_Udotor@dot.ca.gov.
AGENCY:
Notice is
hereby given that the FHWA and other
Federal agencies have taken final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by
issuing approvals for the following
bridge replacement project in the State
of California: The Big Bear Lake Bridge
on State Route 18 in the San Bernardino
National Forest. This project will
provide a structurally sound and
operationally efficient transportation
facility which will blend into and add
value to its environmental setting. The
project will also realign the approach
roadways to the bridge and signalize the
intersection between State Route 18 and
State Route 38. The existing bridge will
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44217
be removed from the top of the dam to
facilitate the Big Bear Municipal Water
District’s planned spillway and outlet
works improvements.
The actions by the Federal agencies
and the laws under which such actions
were taken are described in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the
project, approved on March 30, 2007,
and in other documents in the
administrative record. The FEIS, the
Record of Decision, and other project
records are available by contacting the
FHWA or Caltrans at the addresses
provided above. The environmental
document is also published on-line at
https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist8/pdf/
bigbear-FEIS-R.pdf.
This notice applies to all final
decisions of Federal agencies as of the
issuance date of this notice, and all laws
under which such actions were taken,
including but not limited to:
1. General: The National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42
U.S.C. 4321–4351]; Federal-Aid
Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109]
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q)]
3. Land: The Section 4(f) of the U.S.
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303; Landscaping and
Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23
U.S.C. 319]
4. Wildlife: The Endangered Species
Act [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section
1536], Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d)]; Migratory
Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712]
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archeological
Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16
U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological and
Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C.
469–469(c)]; Native American Grave
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013]
6. Social and Economic Impacts: Civil
Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–
2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious
Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland
Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C.
4201–4209]
7. Wetlands and Water Resources:
Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1251–1377];
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 [33
U.S.C. 401–406]; Flood Disaster
Protection Act [42 U.S.C. 4001–4128]
8. Hazardous Materials:
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) [42 U.S.C. 9601–9675];
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) [42 U.S.C. 6901–6992(k)]
9. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands, E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
44218
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 7, 2007 / Notices
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority and
Low Income Populations, E.O. 11593
Protection and Enhancement of Cultural
Resources, E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred
Sites, E.O. 13287 Preserve America, E.O.
13175 Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments, E.O.
11514 Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality, E.O. 13112
Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
activity.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: July 30, 2007.
Maiser Khaled,
Director, Project Development &
Environment, Federal Highway
Administration, California Division.
[FR Doc. E7–15267 Filed 8–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–27995; Notice 2]
Decision That Nonconforming 1994
and 1996 Left-Hand and Right-Hand
Drive Jeep Cherokee Multipurpose
Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of decision by the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) that
nonconforming 1994 and 1996 left-hand
drive (LHD) and right-hand drive (RHD)
Jeep Cherokee multipurpose passenger
vehicles (MPVs) are eligible for
importation.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces a
decision by NHTSA that certain 1994
and 1996 LHD and RHD Jeep Cherokee
MPVs that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety
standards (FMVSS) are eligible for
importation into the United States
because (1) they are substantially
similar to vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 1994 and 1995 LHD and
RHD Jeep Cherokee MPVs), and (2) they
are capable of being readily altered to
conform to the standards.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:56 Aug 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
This decision is effective [insert
date of letter notifying RI that petition
has been granted].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for sale in the United States, certified
under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same
model year as the model of the motor
vehicle to be compared, and is capable
of being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
admitted into the United States if its
safety features comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS based on
destructive test data or such other
evidence as NHTSA decides to be
adequate.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of
Santa Ana, California (‘‘G&K’’)
(Registered Importer 90–007) petitioned
NHTSA to decide whether 1994 and
1996 LHD and RHD Jeep Cherokee
MPVs are eligible for importation into
the United States. In its petition, G&K
compared these nonconforming vehicles
to substantially similar U.S.-certified
1994 and 1996 LHD and RHD models.
NHTSA published notice of the petition
on April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20915) to
afford an opportunity for public
comment. The reader is referred to that
notice for a thorough description of the
petition. Comments were received in
response to the notice of the petition
from Nippon Security, Inc., doing
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
business as Yokohama Trading LLC,
Yokohama Motors Ltd., and Yokohama
Trading of Japan (collectively
‘‘Yokohama Trading’’).
NHTSA’s analysis of the petition and
Yokohama Trading’s comments are set
forth below, with regard to each of the
issues raised in those comments.
Whether the Vehicles Are in Fact
Nonconforming.
Yokohama Trading’s Contention:
Yokohama Trading disputed G&K’s
characterization of the subject vehicles
as nonconforming by contending that:
The vehicles already bear valid U.S.
vehicle identification numbers (VINs), are
certified as complying with U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
standards, and meet the safety requirements
of the FMVSS and therefore should not be
considered ‘‘non-conforming,’’ but returned
U.S. goods for importation purposes and
allowed in the country without
modifications.
Vehicles intended for use by U.S. Postal
carriers are EXEMPT from the FMVSS under
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
at 49 CFR 390.3(f).
The vehicles are in fact conforming
vehicles so long as their use is restricted to
U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Rural Route
Carriers as they are exempt from full
compliance with FMVSS guidelines,
notwithstanding the fact that, except for a
few inconsequential features, they meet those
guidelines.
NHTSA’s Response: The assignment
of a U.S.-complaint VIN to a vehicle
does not signify that the vehicle
complies with all applicable FMVSS.
Instead, as provided in NHTSA’s
certification regulations at 49 CFR part
567, the vehicle must bear a label,
permanently affixed by its original
manufacturer, certifying that the vehicle
complies with all applicable FMVSS in
effect on the vehicle’s date of
manufacture. The vehicles that are the
subject of the petition were
manufactured by Chrysler Corporation
for sale in markets outside the United
States such as Japan, and consequently
were labeled ‘‘For Export Only.’’ As
such, they cannot be regarded for
importation purposes as conforming
motor vehicles.
The regulations cited by Yokohama
Trading, 49 CFR part 390 Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations, are
regulations issued by the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA),
an agency within DOT that is separate
from NHTSA, for the purpose of
regulating commercial motor vehicles
and their operation in the United States.
Section 390.3(f) of those regulations
provides that the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations do not apply, among
other things, to transportation
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44217-44218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15267]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Limitation on Claims For the Big Bear Bridge
Replacement Project, San Bernardino National Forest, California
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA).
SUMMARY: This notice announces the actions taken by the FHWA and other
Federal agencies that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1). These actions relate to a proposed bridge replacement
project in the San Bernardino National Forest, California. The federal
actions grant approvals and authorize funding for the project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C.(l)(1). A claim seeking judicial review of
the Federal agency actions on the bridge replacement project will be
barred unless a claim is filed on February 4, 2008. If the Federal law
that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period less
than 180 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period
still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cohen, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Federal Highway Administration, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4-
100, Sacramento, CA 95814, weekdays between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. (Pacific
Time), telephone (916) 498-5868, e-mail: David.Cohen@dot.gov; Tay Dam,
Project Development Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 888 S.
Figueroa, Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA 90017, telephone (213) 202-3954,
e-mail: Tay.Dam@dot.gov; Mr. Boniface Udotor, Senior Environmental
Planner, Caltrans District 8, 464 West 4th Street, San Bernardino, CA
92401, telephone (909) 388-1387, e-mail: Boniface--Udotor@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the FHWA and
other Federal agencies have taken final agency actions subject to 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing approvals for the following bridge
replacement project in the State of California: The Big Bear Lake
Bridge on State Route 18 in the San Bernardino National Forest. This
project will provide a structurally sound and operationally efficient
transportation facility which will blend into and add value to its
environmental setting. The project will also realign the approach
roadways to the bridge and signalize the intersection between State
Route 18 and State Route 38. The existing bridge will be removed from
the top of the dam to facilitate the Big Bear Municipal Water
District's planned spillway and outlet works improvements.
The actions by the Federal agencies and the laws under which such
actions were taken are described in the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the project, approved on March 30, 2007, and in other
documents in the administrative record. The FEIS, the Record of
Decision, and other project records are available by contacting the
FHWA or Caltrans at the addresses provided above. The environmental
document is also published on-line at https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist8/pdf/
bigbear-FEIS-R.pdf.
This notice applies to all final decisions of Federal agencies as
of the issuance date of this notice, and all laws under which such
actions were taken, including but not limited to:
1. General: The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C.
4321-4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109]
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)]
3. Land: The Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation
Act of 1966 [49 U.S.C. 303; Landscaping and Scenic Enhancement
(Wildflowers) [23 U.S.C. 319]
4. Wildlife: The Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and
Section 1536], Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661-
667(d)]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703-712]
5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et
seq.]; Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16 U.S.C.
470(aa)-11]; Archeological and Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C.
469-469(c)]; Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001-3013]
6. Social and Economic Impacts: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C.
2000(d)-2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious Freedom Act [42 U.S.C.
1996]; Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 4201-4209]
7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1251-
1377]; Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 [33 U.S.C. 401-406]; Flood
Disaster Protection Act [42 U.S.C. 4001-4128]
8. Hazardous Materials: Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) [42 U.S.C. 9601-9675];
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) [42 U.S.C. 6901-6992(k)]
9. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands, E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898
[[Page 44218]]
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low
Income Populations, E.O. 11593 Protection and Enhancement of Cultural
Resources, E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites, E.O. 13287 Preserve America,
E.O. 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, E.O. 11514 Protection and Enhancement of Environmental
Quality, E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this activity.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: July 30, 2007.
Maiser Khaled,
Director, Project Development & Environment, Federal Highway
Administration, California Division.
[FR Doc. E7-15267 Filed 8-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P