Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request, 43665-43666 [E7-15190]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Notices
designate Antarctic Specially Protected
Areas.
The applications received are as
follows:
Permit Application No.: 2008–007.
1. Applicant: Sam Feola, Director,
Raytheon Polar Services Company, 7400
S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112.
Activity for Which Permit is
Requested: Enter an Antarctic Specially
Protected Area (ASPA). The applicant
plans to enter the Cape Hallett (ASPA
106), Cape Royds (ASPA 121), Barwick
and Balham Valleys (ASPA 123), Cape
Crozer (ASPA 124), Northwest White
Island (ASPA 137), and, Linnaeus
Terrace (ASPA 138) to: Gather up-todate information on site status and on
any installations or facilities; verify that
the values being protected are being
maintained; verify that the management
measures in place are sufficient to
provide protection; and recommend any
management measures that may be
necessary to maintain the values being
protected. Article 6.3 of Annex V to the
Madrid Protocol requires ‘‘A review of
a (ASPA) Management Plan shall be
initiated at least every five years.’’
Updating of the ASPA management plan
is the responsibility of the country that
originally proposed the site, as in this
case, the United States.
Location: Cape Hallett (ASPA 106),
Cape Royds (ASPA 121), Barwick and
Balham Valleys (ASPA 123), Cape
Crozer (ASPA 124), Northwest White
Island (ASPA 137), and, Linnaeus
Terrace (ASPA 138).
Dates: October 1, 2007 to August 31,
2010.
Permit Application No.: 2008–008.
2. Applicant: Rennie S. Holt, Director,
U.S. AMLR Program, Southwest
Fisheries Science Center, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 La Jolla
Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92038.
Activity for Which Permit is
Requested: Take and enter an Antarctic
Specially Protected Area (ASPA). The
applicant proposes to enter Cape
Shirreff (ASPA 149) to collect blood
samples from 30 adult Gentoo and
Chinstrap penguins each. In addition,
time depth recorders (TDRs) and
satellite tags (PTT) will be attached to
the penguins to study the foraging
ecology and diets of the penguins. The
applicant also plans to collect DNA
samples from 50 Antarctic Fur seals
flippers. These samples will be used to
estimate probability of full sib-half sib
for successive matings of individual
females and will provide information on
female choice and degree of site fidelity
in breeding. Finally, the applicant
would like to annually salvage up to 3
adult females and five pups of Antarctic
Fur seals due to accidental mortality.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:38 Aug 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
Also the applicant would like to
annually salvage up to 2 Leopard seals
of any age class due to accidental
mortality. Salvage animals will be used
for study back at the home institution.
Location: Cape Shirreff, Livingston
Island (ASPA 149).
Dates: November 1, 2007 to April 30,
2011.
Permit Application No.: 2008–009.
3. Applicant: Sam Feola, Director,
Raytheon Polar Services Company, 7400
S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112.
Activity for Which Permit is
Requested: Enter an Antarctic Specially
Protected Areas. The applicant proposes
to enter the Byers Peninsula, Livingston
Island Antarctic Specially Protected
Area No. 126 to establish, resupply,
transport personnel, and tear down a
temporary scientific field camp.
Paleontological field work will be
conducted at the site under separate
permit. Access to the site will be via
zodiac from the scientific vessel, ARSV
Laurence M. Gould.
Location: Byers Peninsula, Livingston
Island (ASPA 126).
Dates: 20 November 2007 to
December 31, 2008.
Permit Application No.: 2008–010.
4. Applicant: David Caron,
Department of Biological Sciences,
University of Southern California, 3616
Trousdale Parkway, AHF 301, Los
Angeles, CA 90089.
Activity for Which Permit is
Requested: Introduce non-indigenous
species into Antarctica. The applicant
proposes to bring genetically engineered
E. coli cells for the creation of gene
clone libraries. The cells are provided as
part of the cloning kits to be used in
experiments onboard the R/V Nathaniel
B. Palmer. At no time will cells be
released into the environment and any
remnants of cells and equipment that
comes in contact with the cells are
disposed appropriately as Biohazard.
Location: Ross Sea, Antarctica.
Dates: December 1, 2007 to March 14,
2008.
Permit Application No.: 2008–011.
5. Applicant: Sam Feola, Director,
Raytheon Polar Services Company, 7400
S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112.
Activity for Which Permit is
Requested: Introduce non-indigenous
species into Antarctica. The applicant
proposes to import commercially
available bacterial host cell, Escherichia
coli, for experimental use at the
McMurdo Station Crary Lab. The
experimental purpose is to generate
clones of genes and gene fragments.
Unused bacterial clones will be
destroyed by autoclaving the liquid
culture or agar plates. All laboratory
plastic and glass ware used in the
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43665
cloning and culturing process will be
autoclaved.
Location: McMurdo Station, Crary
Science and Engineering Laboratory.
Dates: October 1, 2007 to April 1,
2010.
Permit Application No.: 2008–012.
6. Applicant: Arthur L. DeVries,
Department of Animal Biology,
University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
Activity for Which Permit is
Requested: Enter and Antarctic
Specially Protected Area. The applicant
proposes to collect Notothenioid fishes
by light Otter trawls or fish traps.
Fishing will be done in the Eastern
Dallmann Bay (ASPA 153) and Western
Bransfield Strait (ASPA 152) areas.
Tissues and blood collections are
needed for quantification of the amount
of antifreeze glycoprotein that is
circulated in their circulatory space.
Spleen and liver tissues are also needed
for isolating genomic DNS and
messenger RNA to investigate the size
and organization of the antifreeze
glycoprotein genome, and to determine
in what tissues the antifreeze
glycoprotein is expressed.
Location: Eastern Dallmann Bay
(ASPA 153) and Western Bransfield
Strait (ASPA 152), Antarctic Peninsula.
Dates: June 15, 2008 to October 15,
2008.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. E7–15178 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Revision.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
43666
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Notices
2. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 4, ‘‘Cumulative
Occupational Dose History’’ and NRC
Form 5, ‘‘Occupational Exposure Record
for a Monitoring Period’’.
3. The form number if applicable:
NRC Form 4 (3150–0005) and NRC
Form 5 (3150–0006).
4. How often the collection is
required: NRC Form 4: Occasionally;
NRC Form 5: Annually.
5. Who is required or asked to report:
NRC licensees who are required to
comply with 10 CFR part 20.
6. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: NRC Form 4: 20,024
(19,822 from reactor sites and 202 from
material licensees) and NRC Form 5:
172,419 (160,701 from reactor sites and
11,718 from material licensees.
7. The estimated number of annual
respondents: NRC Form 4: 218 (104
from reactor sites and 114 from
materials licensees) and NRC Form 5:
4,212 (104 reactor sites and 114
materials licensees, plus an additional
3,994 materials licensees
recordkeepers).
8. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: NRC Form 4:
10,012 hours on an average of 0.5 hours
per response; NRC Form 5: 65,618 hours
(56,898 hours for recordkeeping on an
average of 0.33 hours per record and
8,720 hours for reporting on an average
of 40 hours per licensee).
9. An indication of whether Section
3507(d), Public Law 104–13 applies: N/
A.
10. Abstract: NRC Form 4 is used to
record the summary of an individual’s
cumulative occupational radiation dose
up to and including the current year to
ensure that the dose does not exceed
regulatory limits.
NRC Form 5 is used to record and
report the results of individual
monitoring for occupational radiation
exposure during a one-year (calendar
year) period to ensure regulatory
compliance with annual radiation dose
limits.
A copy of the final supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by September 5, 2007. Comments
received after this date will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:38 Aug 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
given to comments received after this
date.
Nathan Frey, Desk Officer, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(3150–0005 and 3150–0006), NEOB–
10202, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
Comments can also be e-mailed to
Nathan.Frey@omb.eop.gov or submitted
by telephone at (202) 395–4650.
The NRC Clearance Officer is
Margaret A. Janney, 301–415–7245.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of July, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christopher Colburn,
Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Office of
Information Services.
[FR Doc. E7–15190 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–247 and 50–286; License
Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64; EA–07–189]
In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc; Indian Point Nuclear
Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Order
Modifying License (Effective
Immediately)
I
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Licensee) is the holder of Facility
Operating License Nos. DPR–26 and
DPR–64 issued by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part
50. The licenses authorize the operation
of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit
Nos. 2 and 3, in accordance with the
conditions specified therein. The
facilities are located on the Licensee’s
site in Buchanan, New York.
II
On April 23, 2007, the NRC issued to
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Entergy) a Notice of Violation (NOV)
and Proposed Imposition of Civil
Penalty for a violation involving the
failure to meet the requirements of a
Confirmatory Order (EA–05–190) that
was issued to Entergy on January 31,
2006. On January 23, 2007, the NRC
granted Entergy’s request, provided in a
letter dated January 11, 2007, to extend
the full implementation date until April
15, 2007. The NRC issued the NOV and
Proposed Civil Penalty after Entergy
informed the NRC that the ‘‘radio only
activation’’ feature of the emergency
notification system (ENS) did not meet
its test acceptance criteria, resulting in
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the ENS not being fully operable by
April 15, 2007, the date it was required
to be operable. Entergy responded to the
NOV on May 23, 2007, and committed
to declaring the new ENS operable by
August 24, 2007. In its response,
Entergy admitted to the violation of the
Confirmatory Order, identified the
apparent causes of the violation, and
described corrective actions that were
taken or planned to correct the
violation.
Subsequent to the Licensee’s May 23,
2007, letter, the NRC held a public
meeting with Entergy officials on July 9,
2007, to clarify Entergy’s actions to
comply with the Confirmatory Order,
particularly with respect to ensuring
that the new ENS met the applicable
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) regulations, as well as to ensure
that any specific county needs were
identified and addressed prior to
Entergy declaring the new ENS
operable.
The NRC has evaluated Entergy’s
response to the NOV and the additional
information gathered during the July 9,
2007, public meeting. The NRC has
determined that additional actions are
needed to ensure that the new ENS with
backup power supply capability is
operable by August 24, 2007, as
committed to in Entergy’s May 23, 2007
letter. These actions include:
Completing the outstanding
requirements delineated in the
aforementioned Confirmatory Order
issued January 31, 2006, as modified
herein; implementing those measures
necessary for FEMA to accept the new
ENS as the primary ENS for alerting the
public by August 24, 2007; and,
completing the necessary software and
procedure upgrades and training of
county personnel responsible for
actuation of the system.
III
Adequate backup power for the ENS,
as required by the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (Act) (see 42 U.S.C. 2210 et seq.)
Section 651(b), requires that: (a) The
backup power supply for the Public
Alerting System (PAS) must meet
commonly-applicable standards, such as
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) Standard 1221, Standard for the
Installation, Maintenance, and Use of
Emergency Communications Systems
(2002) and Underwriters Laboratory
(UL) 2017, Section 58.2; (b) each PAS
and PAS Alerting Appliance (PASAA)
must receive adequate power to perform
their intended functions such that
backup power is sufficient to allow
operation in standby mode for a
minimum of 24 hours and in alert mode
for a minimum of 15 minutes; (c)
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 150 (Monday, August 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43665-43666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15190]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and
solicitation of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently submitted to OMB for review the following
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and that a person is not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
1. Type of submission, new, revision, or extension: Revision.
[[Page 43666]]
2. The title of the information collection: NRC Form 4,
``Cumulative Occupational Dose History'' and NRC Form 5, ``Occupational
Exposure Record for a Monitoring Period''.
3. The form number if applicable: NRC Form 4 (3150-0005) and NRC
Form 5 (3150-0006).
4. How often the collection is required: NRC Form 4: Occasionally;
NRC Form 5: Annually.
5. Who is required or asked to report: NRC licensees who are
required to comply with 10 CFR part 20.
6. An estimate of the number of annual responses: NRC Form 4:
20,024 (19,822 from reactor sites and 202 from material licensees) and
NRC Form 5: 172,419 (160,701 from reactor sites and 11,718 from
material licensees.
7. The estimated number of annual respondents: NRC Form 4: 218 (104
from reactor sites and 114 from materials licensees) and NRC Form 5:
4,212 (104 reactor sites and 114 materials licensees, plus an
additional 3,994 materials licensees recordkeepers).
8. An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to
complete the requirement or request: NRC Form 4: 10,012 hours on an
average of 0.5 hours per response; NRC Form 5: 65,618 hours (56,898
hours for recordkeeping on an average of 0.33 hours per record and
8,720 hours for reporting on an average of 40 hours per licensee).
9. An indication of whether Section 3507(d), Public Law 104-13
applies: N/A.
10. Abstract: NRC Form 4 is used to record the summary of an
individual's cumulative occupational radiation dose up to and including
the current year to ensure that the dose does not exceed regulatory
limits.
NRC Form 5 is used to record and report the results of individual
monitoring for occupational radiation exposure during a one-year
(calendar year) period to ensure regulatory compliance with annual
radiation dose limits.
A copy of the final supporting statement may be viewed free of
charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. OMB clearance
requests are available at the NRC worldwide Web site: https://
www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The document
will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be directed to the OMB reviewer
listed below by September 5, 2007. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of
consideration cannot be given to comments received after this date.
Nathan Frey, Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (3150-0005 and 3150-0006), NEOB-10202, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
Comments can also be e-mailed to Nathan.Frey@omb.eop.gov or
submitted by telephone at (202) 395-4650.
The NRC Clearance Officer is Margaret A. Janney, 301-415-7245.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of July, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christopher Colburn,
Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services.
[FR Doc. E7-15190 Filed 8-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P